SlideShare une entreprise Scribd logo
1  sur  9
Télécharger pour lire hors ligne
RCC Institute of Technology
A Division of Yorkville University
Date: 2/1/2016
2000 Steeles Ave West
Concord, ON L4K 4N1
http://www.rccit.ca/
Total Pages: 3
Student: Amira Hamdy Moh Hamdy (71766)
School: Toronto Film School Program: Interior Decorating Award:
Enroll Status: ACTIVE Start Date: 10/6/2014 LDA: 2/1/2016
Transfer/Test Out Credits
FAB1001
Professional Communications
University of Modern Sciences & Arts: Hon BA Mass Communication(Advertising & PR);
0.00 3.00 P 0.00
FAT1151
Computer Applications
University for Modern Sciences & Arts: CS100 Introduction to Intormation Technology;
0.00 2.00 TC 0.00
Term: Fall 2014 Term Start: 10/6/2014 Term End: 12/28/2014
Course
Code
Course
Description
Faculty
Credits
Attempted
Credits
Earned
Grade
Date
Completed
GPA
Omit
FAB1001 Professional Communications Doris Montanera 3.00 3.00 P (201) 10/6/2014 TG
IDD110 Introduction to Interior Decorating Tracy O'Brien 3.00 3.00 A (87) 12/28/2014
IDD111 Colour Theory Susan Anderson 3.00 3.00 A+ (95) 12/28/2014
IDD112 Drafting 1 Tracy O'Brien 3.00 3.00 B+ (79.4) 12/28/2014
IDD113 Freehand Drawing Jeff Cairns 3.00 3.00 A- (84.6) 12/28/2014
IDD114 History of Design Deanna Georgeson 3.00 3.00 A+ (93) 12/28/2014
SS101 Student Success Seminar Jeff Cairns 0.00 0.00 S (206) 12/28/2014 T
Term GPA: 3.92 Total Credits Attempted: 15.00
Cum GPA: 3.92 Term Credits Earned: 15.00/15.00
End Status: President's List, Honours List Cum Credits Earned: 15.00/20.00
Term: Winter 2015 Term Start: 1/5/2015 Term End: 3/29/2015
Course
Code
Course
Description
Faculty
Credits
Attempted
Credits
Earned
Grade
Date
Completed
GPA
Omit
IDD211 Drafting 2 Tracy O'Brien 3.00 3.00 A+ (90.5) 3/29/2015
IDD212 Human Factors and Space Planning Tracy O'Brien 3.00 3.00 A (85.6) 3/29/2015
IDD213 History of Art 1 Alec Steinwall 3.00 3.00 A+ (90.6) 3/29/2015
IDD214 Materials and Textiles Tracy O'Brien 3.00 3.00 A+ (92.7) 3/29/2015
IDD215 Visual Communications 1 Jeff Cairns 3.00 3.00 A+ (92.5) 3/29/2015
IDDW201 Studio Workshop 1 Pheinixx Paul 3.00 3.00 S (206) 3/29/2015 TG
IDT210 Digital Design 1 Milorad Eftoski 3.00 3.00 A (86) 3/29/2015
Term GPA: 4.20 Total Credits Attempted: 21.00
Cum GPA: 4.07 Term Credits Earned: 18.00/21.00
End Status: President's List, Honours List Cum Credits Earned: 33.00/41.00
Term: Spring 2015 Term Start: 4/6/2015 Term End: 6/28/2015
Course
Code
Course
Description
Faculty
Credits
Attempted
Credits
Earned
Grade
Date
Completed
GPA
Omit
IDD311 CADD 1 Sancho Bustamante 3.00 3.00 A+ (90) 6/28/2015
IDD312 Design Studio 1 Sabrina Di Maio 3.00 3.00 A+ (91.4) 6/28/2015
IDD313 History of Art 2 Matthew Stasyna 3.00 3.00 A (88) 6/28/2015
IDD314 Home Staging Sabrina Di Maio 3.00 3.00 A+ (90.5) 6/28/2015
IDD315 Visual Communications 2 Jeff Cairns 3.00 3.00 A+ (91) 6/28/2015
IDDW416 Studio Workshop 2 Candace Sharma 2.00 2.00 S (206) 6/28/2015 TG
IDT310 Digital Design 2 Sancho Bustamante 2.00 2.00 A+ (90) 6/28/2015
Term GPA: 4.25 Total Credits Attempted: 19.00
Cum GPA: 4.13 Term Credits Earned: 17.00/19.00
End Status: President's List, Honours List Cum Credits Earned: 50.00/60.00
*** End of Data: Page 1 ***
GRADING SCHEMA:
RCC Institute of Technology (4.3)
Grade Range Points Description
S N/A
Satisfactory Course
Completion (not included in
GPA)
A+
90.0% -
100.0%
4.3
Excellent or outstanding
performance in relation to
expected learning outcomes
for the course or subject.
A
85.0% -
89.9%
4
Excellent or outstanding
performance in relation to
expected learning outcomes
for the course or subject.
A-
80.0% -
84.9%
3.7
Excellent or outstanding
performance in relation to
expected learning outcomes
for the course or subject.
B+
77.0% -
79.9%
3.3
Good performance in relation
to expected learning
outcomes for the course or
subject.
B
73.0% -
76.9%
3
Good performance in relation
to expected learning
outcomes for the course or
subject.
B-
70.0% -
72.9%
2.7
Good performance in relation
to expected learning
outcomes for the course or
subject.
C+
67.0% -
69.9%
2.3
Satisfactory performance in
relation to expected learning
outcomes for the course or
subject.
C
63.0% -
66.9%
2
Satisfactory performance in
relation to expected learning
outcomes for the course or
subject.
C-
60.0% -
62.9%
1.7
Satisfactory performance in
relation to expected learning
outcomes for the course or
subject.
D+
57.0% -
59.9%
1.3
Minimally acceptable
performance in relation to
expected learning outcomes
for the course or subject.
D
53.0% -
56.9%
1
Minimally acceptable
performance in relation to
expected learning outcomes
for the course or subject.
D-
50.0% -
52.9%
0.7
Minimally acceptable
performance in relation to
expected learning outcomes
for the course or subject.
F
35.0% -
49.9%
0
Does not demonstrated the
minimally acceptable
performance in relation to the
expected learning outcomes
for the course or subject.
F
0.0% -
34.9%
0
Does not demonstrated the
minimally acceptable
performance in relation to the
expected learning outcomes
for the course or subject.
U N/A
Unsatisfactory Course
Completion (not included in
GPA)
W N/A Withdrawal
RCC Institute of Technology (4.3), Effective Jan 2014
Grade Range Points Description
S N/A
Satisfactory Course
Completion (not included in
GPA)
A+
90.0% -
100.0%
4.3
Excellent or outstanding
performance in relation to
expected learning outcomes
for the course or subject.
A
85.0% -
89.9%
4
Excellent or outstanding
performance in relation to
expected learning outcomes
for the course or subject.
A-
80.0% -
84.9%
3.7
Excellent or outstanding
performance in relation to
expected learning outcomes
for the course or subject.
B+
77.0% -
79.9%
3.3
Good performance in relation
to expected learning
outcomes for the course or
subject.
B
73.0% -
76.9%
3
Good performance in relation
to expected learning
outcomes for the course or
subject.
B-
70.0% -
72.9%
2.7
Good performance in relation
to expected learning
outcomes for the course or
subject.
C+
67.0% -
69.9%
2.3
Satisfactory performance in
relation to expected learning
outcomes for the course or
subject.
C
63.0% -
66.9%
2
Satisfactory performance in
relation to expected learning
outcomes for the course or
subject.
C-
60.0% -
62.9%
1.7
Satisfactory performance in
relation to expected learning
outcomes for the course or
subject.
D+
57.0% -
59.9%
1.3
Minimally acceptable
performance in relation to
expected learning outcomes
for the course or subject.
D
53.0% -
56.9%
1
Minimally acceptable
performance in relation to
expected learning outcomes
for the course or subject.
D-
50.0% -
52.9%
0.7
Minimally acceptable
performance in relation to
expected learning outcomes
for the course or subject.
F
35.0% -
49.9%
0
Does not demonstrated the
minimally acceptable
performance in relation to the
expected learning outcomes
for the course or subject.
F
0.0% -
34.9%
0
Does not demonstrated the
minimally acceptable
performance in relation to the
expected learning outcomes
for the course or subject.
U N/A
Unsatisfactory Course
Completion (not included in
GPA)
W N/A Withdrawal
Toronto Film School (4.3), Effective Jan 2015
Grade Range Points Description
S N/A
Satisfactory Course
Completion (not included in
GPA)
A+
90.0% -
100.0%
4.3
Excellent or outstanding
performance in relation to
expected learning outcomes
for the course or subject.
A
85.0% -
89.9%
4
Excellent or outstanding
performance in relation to
expected learning outcomes
for the course or subject.
A-
80.0% -
84.9%
3.7
Excellent or outstanding
performance in relation to
expected learning outcomes
for the course or subject.
B+
77.0% -
79.9%
3.3
Good performance in relation
to expected learning
outcomes for the course or
subject.
B
73.0% -
76.9%
3
Good performance in relation
to expected learning
outcomes for the course or
subject.
B-
70.0% -
72.9%
2.7
Good performance in relation
to expected learning
outcomes for the course or
subject.
C+
67.0% -
69.9%
2.3
Satisfactory performance in
relation to expected learning
outcomes for the course or
subject.
C
63.0% -
66.9%
2
Satisfactory performance in
relation to expected learning
outcomes for the course or
subject.
C-
60.0% -
62.9%
1.7
Satisfactory performance in
relation to expected learning
outcomes for the course or
subject.
D+
57.0% -
59.9%
1.3
Minimally acceptable
performance in relation to
expected learning outcomes
for the course or subject.
D
53.0% -
56.9%
1
Minimally acceptable
performance in relation to
expected learning outcomes
for the course or subject.
D-
50.0% -
52.9%
0.7
Minimally acceptable
performance in relation to
expected learning outcomes
for the course or subject.
F
35.0% -
49.9%
0
Does not demonstrated the
minimally acceptable
performance in relation to the
expected learning outcomes
for the course or subject.
F
0.0% -
34.9%
0
Does not demonstrated the
minimally acceptable
performance in relation to the
expected learning outcomes
for the course or subject.
U N/A
Unsatisfactory Course
Completion (not included in
GPA)
W N/A Withdrawal
TERM & CUMULATIVE CREDITS EARNED
The term and cumulative credits earned totals indicate two values:
The first value indicates the total credits earned from courses that are part of the Program of Study.
The second value, in italic text, indicates the total credits earned from all courses taken (not including transfer credits or proficiency credits.
GPA OMIT DESIGNATORS
TT or T: Non-credit course.
TG: Credits earned are not included in the GPA
TN: Course is not part of the student program of study
TC: Course has been replaced with a different Course ID, replacement course mark is higher
TR: Course has been retaken and the retake mark is higher
TE: Course has not yet been completed, this mark is a progress mark and is not final
RCC Institute of Technology
A Division of Yorkville University
Date: 2/1/2016
2000 Steeles Ave West
Concord, ON L4K 4N1
http://www.rccit.ca/
Total Pages: 3
Student: Amira Hamdy Moh Hamdy (71766)
School: Toronto Film School Program: Interior Decorating Award:
Enroll Status: ACTIVE Start Date: 10/6/2014 LDA: 2/1/2016
Term: Summer 2015 Term Start: 7/6/2015 Term End: 9/27/2015
Course
Code
Course
Description
Faculty
Credits
Attempted
Credits
Earned
Grade
Date
Completed
GPA
Omit
IDD411 CADD 2 Michael Guido 3.00 3.00 A+ (94.3) 9/27/2015
IDD412 Design Studio 2 David Renn 3.00 3.00 A+ (100) 9/27/2015
IDD413 Lighting Nihan Basak 3.00 3.00 A+ (100) 9/27/2015
IDD414 Styling Spaces Sabrina Di Maio 3.00 3.00 A+ (94.4) 9/27/2015
IDD415 Visual Communications 3 Jeff Cairns 3.00 3.00 A+ (92.5) 9/27/2015
IDD511 Building Systems an Introduction Sabrina Di Maio 2.00 2.00 A+ (90.8) 9/27/2015
IDDW516 Studio Workshop 3 Sabrina Di Maio 3.00 3.00 S (206) 9/27/2015 TG
Term GPA: 4.30 Total Credits Attempted: 20.00
Cum GPA: 4.17 Term Credits Earned: 17.00/20.00
End Status: President's List, Honours List Cum Credits Earned: 67.00/80.00
Term: Fall 2015 Term Start: 10/5/2015 Term End: 12/27/2015
Course
Code
Course
Description
Faculty
Credits
Attempted
Credits
Earned
Grade
Date
Completed
GPA
Omit
IDD316 Image Presentation Sabrina Di Maio 2.00 2.00 S (206) 12/27/2015 TG
Term GPA: 0.00 Total Credits Attempted: 2.00
Cum GPA: 4.14 Term Credits Earned: 0.00/2.00
End Status: Cum Credits Earned: 84.00/99.00
Term: Fall 2015 Term Start: 10/5/2015 Term End: 12/27/2015
Course
Code
Course
Description
Faculty
Credits
Attempted
Credits
Earned
Grade
Date
Completed
GPA
Omit
IDD410 Interior Specifications Michael Guido 2.00 2.00 A+ (90) 12/27/2015
IDD512 Design Studio 3 Sabrina Di Maio 3.00 3.00 A- (84) 12/27/2015
IDD513 History of Furniture and Decoration Nihan Basak 3.00 3.00 A+ (91) 12/27/2015
IDD514 Professional Practice 1 Candace Sharma 3.00 3.00 A- (82) 12/27/2015
IDD515 Visual Merchandising Jeff Cairns 3.00 3.00 A+ (94) 12/27/2015
IDT510 Digital Design in 3D Martin Radikov 3.00 3.00 A- (84) 12/27/2015
Term GPA: 3.98 Total Credits Attempted: 17.00
Cum GPA: 4.14 Term Credits Earned: 17.00/17.00
End Status: President's List, Honours List Cum Credits Earned: 84.00/97.00
*** End of Data: Page 2 ***
GRADING SCHEMA:
RCC Institute of Technology (4.3)
Grade Range Points Description
S N/A
Satisfactory Course
Completion (not included in
GPA)
A+
90.0% -
100.0%
4.3
Excellent or outstanding
performance in relation to
expected learning outcomes
for the course or subject.
A
85.0% -
89.9%
4
Excellent or outstanding
performance in relation to
expected learning outcomes
for the course or subject.
A-
80.0% -
84.9%
3.7
Excellent or outstanding
performance in relation to
expected learning outcomes
for the course or subject.
B+
77.0% -
79.9%
3.3
Good performance in relation
to expected learning
outcomes for the course or
subject.
B
73.0% -
76.9%
3
Good performance in relation
to expected learning
outcomes for the course or
subject.
B-
70.0% -
72.9%
2.7
Good performance in relation
to expected learning
outcomes for the course or
subject.
C+
67.0% -
69.9%
2.3
Satisfactory performance in
relation to expected learning
outcomes for the course or
subject.
C
63.0% -
66.9%
2
Satisfactory performance in
relation to expected learning
outcomes for the course or
subject.
C-
60.0% -
62.9%
1.7
Satisfactory performance in
relation to expected learning
outcomes for the course or
subject.
D+
57.0% -
59.9%
1.3
Minimally acceptable
performance in relation to
expected learning outcomes
for the course or subject.
D
53.0% -
56.9%
1
Minimally acceptable
performance in relation to
expected learning outcomes
for the course or subject.
D-
50.0% -
52.9%
0.7
Minimally acceptable
performance in relation to
expected learning outcomes
for the course or subject.
F
35.0% -
49.9%
0
Does not demonstrated the
minimally acceptable
performance in relation to the
expected learning outcomes
for the course or subject.
F
0.0% -
34.9%
0
Does not demonstrated the
minimally acceptable
performance in relation to the
expected learning outcomes
for the course or subject.
U N/A
Unsatisfactory Course
Completion (not included in
GPA)
W N/A Withdrawal
RCC Institute of Technology (4.3), Effective Jan 2014
Grade Range Points Description
S N/A
Satisfactory Course
Completion (not included in
GPA)
A+
90.0% -
100.0%
4.3
Excellent or outstanding
performance in relation to
expected learning outcomes
for the course or subject.
A
85.0% -
89.9%
4
Excellent or outstanding
performance in relation to
expected learning outcomes
for the course or subject.
A-
80.0% -
84.9%
3.7
Excellent or outstanding
performance in relation to
expected learning outcomes
for the course or subject.
B+
77.0% -
79.9%
3.3
Good performance in relation
to expected learning
outcomes for the course or
subject.
B
73.0% -
76.9%
3
Good performance in relation
to expected learning
outcomes for the course or
subject.
B-
70.0% -
72.9%
2.7
Good performance in relation
to expected learning
outcomes for the course or
subject.
C+
67.0% -
69.9%
2.3
Satisfactory performance in
relation to expected learning
outcomes for the course or
subject.
C
63.0% -
66.9%
2
Satisfactory performance in
relation to expected learning
outcomes for the course or
subject.
C-
60.0% -
62.9%
1.7
Satisfactory performance in
relation to expected learning
outcomes for the course or
subject.
D+
57.0% -
59.9%
1.3
Minimally acceptable
performance in relation to
expected learning outcomes
for the course or subject.
D
53.0% -
56.9%
1
Minimally acceptable
performance in relation to
expected learning outcomes
for the course or subject.
D-
50.0% -
52.9%
0.7
Minimally acceptable
performance in relation to
expected learning outcomes
for the course or subject.
F
35.0% -
49.9%
0
Does not demonstrated the
minimally acceptable
performance in relation to the
expected learning outcomes
for the course or subject.
F
0.0% -
34.9%
0
Does not demonstrated the
minimally acceptable
performance in relation to the
expected learning outcomes
for the course or subject.
U N/A
Unsatisfactory Course
Completion (not included in
GPA)
W N/A Withdrawal
Toronto Film School (4.3), Effective Jan 2015
Grade Range Points Description
S N/A
Satisfactory Course
Completion (not included in
GPA)
A+
90.0% -
100.0%
4.3
Excellent or outstanding
performance in relation to
expected learning outcomes
for the course or subject.
A
85.0% -
89.9%
4
Excellent or outstanding
performance in relation to
expected learning outcomes
for the course or subject.
A-
80.0% -
84.9%
3.7
Excellent or outstanding
performance in relation to
expected learning outcomes
for the course or subject.
B+
77.0% -
79.9%
3.3
Good performance in relation
to expected learning
outcomes for the course or
subject.
B
73.0% -
76.9%
3
Good performance in relation
to expected learning
outcomes for the course or
subject.
B-
70.0% -
72.9%
2.7
Good performance in relation
to expected learning
outcomes for the course or
subject.
C+
67.0% -
69.9%
2.3
Satisfactory performance in
relation to expected learning
outcomes for the course or
subject.
C
63.0% -
66.9%
2
Satisfactory performance in
relation to expected learning
outcomes for the course or
subject.
C-
60.0% -
62.9%
1.7
Satisfactory performance in
relation to expected learning
outcomes for the course or
subject.
D+
57.0% -
59.9%
1.3
Minimally acceptable
performance in relation to
expected learning outcomes
for the course or subject.
D
53.0% -
56.9%
1
Minimally acceptable
performance in relation to
expected learning outcomes
for the course or subject.
D-
50.0% -
52.9%
0.7
Minimally acceptable
performance in relation to
expected learning outcomes
for the course or subject.
F
35.0% -
49.9%
0
Does not demonstrated the
minimally acceptable
performance in relation to the
expected learning outcomes
for the course or subject.
F
0.0% -
34.9%
0
Does not demonstrated the
minimally acceptable
performance in relation to the
expected learning outcomes
for the course or subject.
U N/A
Unsatisfactory Course
Completion (not included in
GPA)
W N/A Withdrawal
TERM & CUMULATIVE CREDITS EARNED
The term and cumulative credits earned totals indicate two values:
The first value indicates the total credits earned from courses that are part of the Program of Study.
The second value, in italic text, indicates the total credits earned from all courses taken (not including transfer credits or proficiency credits.
GPA OMIT DESIGNATORS
TT or T: Non-credit course.
TG: Credits earned are not included in the GPA
TN: Course is not part of the student program of study
TC: Course has been replaced with a different Course ID, replacement course mark is higher
TR: Course has been retaken and the retake mark is higher
TE: Course has not yet been completed, this mark is a progress mark and is not final
RCC Institute of Technology
A Division of Yorkville University
Date: 2/1/2016
2000 Steeles Ave West
Concord, ON L4K 4N1
http://www.rccit.ca/
Total Pages: 3
Student: Amira Hamdy Moh Hamdy (71766)
School: Toronto Film School Program: Interior Decorating Award:
Enroll Status: ACTIVE Start Date: 10/6/2014 LDA: 2/1/2016
Term: Winter 2016 Term Start: 1/11/2016 Term End: 4/3/2016
Course
Code
Course
Description
Faculty
Credits
Attempted
Credits
Earned
Grade
Date
Completed
GPA
Omit
IDD610 Construction Drawings Jeff Wong 3.00 0.00 A (85) 3/27/2016 TE
IDD611 Portfolio Presentation Martyn Lee 3.00 0.00 A+ (93.3) 3/27/2016 TE
IDD612 Design Thesis Sabrina Di Maio 3.00 0.00 B (75) 3/27/2016 TE
IDD614 Professional Practice 2 Candace Sharma 2.00 0.00 B (75) 3/27/2016 TE
IDD613 Sustainable Materials and Finishes 3.00 0.00 EN (205) 4/3/2016 TE
IDDW615 Studio Workshop 4 3.00 0.00 EN (205) 4/3/2016 TE
Term GPA: 0.00 Total Credits Attempted: 17.00
Cum GPA: 4.14 Term Credits Earned: 0.00/0.00
End Status: Cum Credits Earned: 84.00/99.00
*** End of Data: Page 3 ***
GRADING SCHEMA:
RCC Institute of Technology (4.3)
Grade Range Points Description
S N/A
Satisfactory Course
Completion (not included in
GPA)
A+
90.0% -
100.0%
4.3
Excellent or outstanding
performance in relation to
expected learning outcomes
for the course or subject.
A
85.0% -
89.9%
4
Excellent or outstanding
performance in relation to
expected learning outcomes
for the course or subject.
A-
80.0% -
84.9%
3.7
Excellent or outstanding
performance in relation to
expected learning outcomes
for the course or subject.
B+
77.0% -
79.9%
3.3
Good performance in relation
to expected learning
outcomes for the course or
subject.
B
73.0% -
76.9%
3
Good performance in relation
to expected learning
outcomes for the course or
subject.
B-
70.0% -
72.9%
2.7
Good performance in relation
to expected learning
outcomes for the course or
subject.
C+
67.0% -
69.9%
2.3
Satisfactory performance in
relation to expected learning
outcomes for the course or
subject.
C
63.0% -
66.9%
2
Satisfactory performance in
relation to expected learning
outcomes for the course or
subject.
C-
60.0% -
62.9%
1.7
Satisfactory performance in
relation to expected learning
outcomes for the course or
subject.
D+
57.0% -
59.9%
1.3
Minimally acceptable
performance in relation to
expected learning outcomes
for the course or subject.
D
53.0% -
56.9%
1
Minimally acceptable
performance in relation to
expected learning outcomes
for the course or subject.
D-
50.0% -
52.9%
0.7
Minimally acceptable
performance in relation to
expected learning outcomes
for the course or subject.
F
35.0% -
49.9%
0
Does not demonstrated the
minimally acceptable
performance in relation to the
expected learning outcomes
for the course or subject.
F
0.0% -
34.9%
0
Does not demonstrated the
minimally acceptable
performance in relation to the
expected learning outcomes
for the course or subject.
U N/A
Unsatisfactory Course
Completion (not included in
GPA)
W N/A Withdrawal
RCC Institute of Technology (4.3), Effective Jan 2014
Grade Range Points Description
S N/A
Satisfactory Course
Completion (not included in
GPA)
A+
90.0% -
100.0%
4.3
Excellent or outstanding
performance in relation to
expected learning outcomes
for the course or subject.
A
85.0% -
89.9%
4
Excellent or outstanding
performance in relation to
expected learning outcomes
for the course or subject.
A-
80.0% -
84.9%
3.7
Excellent or outstanding
performance in relation to
expected learning outcomes
for the course or subject.
B+
77.0% -
79.9%
3.3
Good performance in relation
to expected learning
outcomes for the course or
subject.
B
73.0% -
76.9%
3
Good performance in relation
to expected learning
outcomes for the course or
subject.
B-
70.0% -
72.9%
2.7
Good performance in relation
to expected learning
outcomes for the course or
subject.
C+
67.0% -
69.9%
2.3
Satisfactory performance in
relation to expected learning
outcomes for the course or
subject.
C
63.0% -
66.9%
2
Satisfactory performance in
relation to expected learning
outcomes for the course or
subject.
C-
60.0% -
62.9%
1.7
Satisfactory performance in
relation to expected learning
outcomes for the course or
subject.
D+
57.0% -
59.9%
1.3
Minimally acceptable
performance in relation to
expected learning outcomes
for the course or subject.
D
53.0% -
56.9%
1
Minimally acceptable
performance in relation to
expected learning outcomes
for the course or subject.
D-
50.0% -
52.9%
0.7
Minimally acceptable
performance in relation to
expected learning outcomes
for the course or subject.
F
35.0% -
49.9%
0
Does not demonstrated the
minimally acceptable
performance in relation to the
expected learning outcomes
for the course or subject.
F
0.0% -
34.9%
0
Does not demonstrated the
minimally acceptable
performance in relation to the
expected learning outcomes
for the course or subject.
U N/A
Unsatisfactory Course
Completion (not included in
GPA)
W N/A Withdrawal
Toronto Film School (4.3), Effective Jan 2015
Grade Range Points Description
S N/A
Satisfactory Course
Completion (not included in
GPA)
A+
90.0% -
100.0%
4.3
Excellent or outstanding
performance in relation to
expected learning outcomes
for the course or subject.
A
85.0% -
89.9%
4
Excellent or outstanding
performance in relation to
expected learning outcomes
for the course or subject.
A-
80.0% -
84.9%
3.7
Excellent or outstanding
performance in relation to
expected learning outcomes
for the course or subject.
B+
77.0% -
79.9%
3.3
Good performance in relation
to expected learning
outcomes for the course or
subject.
B
73.0% -
76.9%
3
Good performance in relation
to expected learning
outcomes for the course or
subject.
B-
70.0% -
72.9%
2.7
Good performance in relation
to expected learning
outcomes for the course or
subject.
C+
67.0% -
69.9%
2.3
Satisfactory performance in
relation to expected learning
outcomes for the course or
subject.
C
63.0% -
66.9%
2
Satisfactory performance in
relation to expected learning
outcomes for the course or
subject.
C-
60.0% -
62.9%
1.7
Satisfactory performance in
relation to expected learning
outcomes for the course or
subject.
D+
57.0% -
59.9%
1.3
Minimally acceptable
performance in relation to
expected learning outcomes
for the course or subject.
D
53.0% -
56.9%
1
Minimally acceptable
performance in relation to
expected learning outcomes
for the course or subject.
D-
50.0% -
52.9%
0.7
Minimally acceptable
performance in relation to
expected learning outcomes
for the course or subject.
F
35.0% -
49.9%
0
Does not demonstrated the
minimally acceptable
performance in relation to the
expected learning outcomes
for the course or subject.
F
0.0% -
34.9%
0
Does not demonstrated the
minimally acceptable
performance in relation to the
expected learning outcomes
for the course or subject.
U N/A
Unsatisfactory Course
Completion (not included in
GPA)
W N/A Withdrawal
TERM & CUMULATIVE CREDITS EARNED
The term and cumulative credits earned totals indicate two values:
The first value indicates the total credits earned from courses that are part of the Program of Study.
The second value, in italic text, indicates the total credits earned from all courses taken (not including transfer credits or proficiency credits.
GPA OMIT DESIGNATORS
TT or T: Non-credit course.
TG: Credits earned are not included in the GPA
TN: Course is not part of the student program of study
TC: Course has been replaced with a different Course ID, replacement course mark is higher
TR: Course has been retaken and the retake mark is higher
TE: Course has not yet been completed, this mark is a progress mark and is not final

Contenu connexe

En vedette

PEPSICO Presentation to CAGNY Conference Feb 2024
PEPSICO Presentation to CAGNY Conference Feb 2024PEPSICO Presentation to CAGNY Conference Feb 2024
PEPSICO Presentation to CAGNY Conference Feb 2024Neil Kimberley
 
Content Methodology: A Best Practices Report (Webinar)
Content Methodology: A Best Practices Report (Webinar)Content Methodology: A Best Practices Report (Webinar)
Content Methodology: A Best Practices Report (Webinar)contently
 
How to Prepare For a Successful Job Search for 2024
How to Prepare For a Successful Job Search for 2024How to Prepare For a Successful Job Search for 2024
How to Prepare For a Successful Job Search for 2024Albert Qian
 
Social Media Marketing Trends 2024 // The Global Indie Insights
Social Media Marketing Trends 2024 // The Global Indie InsightsSocial Media Marketing Trends 2024 // The Global Indie Insights
Social Media Marketing Trends 2024 // The Global Indie InsightsKurio // The Social Media Age(ncy)
 
Trends In Paid Search: Navigating The Digital Landscape In 2024
Trends In Paid Search: Navigating The Digital Landscape In 2024Trends In Paid Search: Navigating The Digital Landscape In 2024
Trends In Paid Search: Navigating The Digital Landscape In 2024Search Engine Journal
 
5 Public speaking tips from TED - Visualized summary
5 Public speaking tips from TED - Visualized summary5 Public speaking tips from TED - Visualized summary
5 Public speaking tips from TED - Visualized summarySpeakerHub
 
ChatGPT and the Future of Work - Clark Boyd
ChatGPT and the Future of Work - Clark Boyd ChatGPT and the Future of Work - Clark Boyd
ChatGPT and the Future of Work - Clark Boyd Clark Boyd
 
Getting into the tech field. what next
Getting into the tech field. what next Getting into the tech field. what next
Getting into the tech field. what next Tessa Mero
 
Google's Just Not That Into You: Understanding Core Updates & Search Intent
Google's Just Not That Into You: Understanding Core Updates & Search IntentGoogle's Just Not That Into You: Understanding Core Updates & Search Intent
Google's Just Not That Into You: Understanding Core Updates & Search IntentLily Ray
 
Time Management & Productivity - Best Practices
Time Management & Productivity -  Best PracticesTime Management & Productivity -  Best Practices
Time Management & Productivity - Best PracticesVit Horky
 
The six step guide to practical project management
The six step guide to practical project managementThe six step guide to practical project management
The six step guide to practical project managementMindGenius
 
Beginners Guide to TikTok for Search - Rachel Pearson - We are Tilt __ Bright...
Beginners Guide to TikTok for Search - Rachel Pearson - We are Tilt __ Bright...Beginners Guide to TikTok for Search - Rachel Pearson - We are Tilt __ Bright...
Beginners Guide to TikTok for Search - Rachel Pearson - We are Tilt __ Bright...RachelPearson36
 
Unlocking the Power of ChatGPT and AI in Testing - A Real-World Look, present...
Unlocking the Power of ChatGPT and AI in Testing - A Real-World Look, present...Unlocking the Power of ChatGPT and AI in Testing - A Real-World Look, present...
Unlocking the Power of ChatGPT and AI in Testing - A Real-World Look, present...Applitools
 
12 Ways to Increase Your Influence at Work
12 Ways to Increase Your Influence at Work12 Ways to Increase Your Influence at Work
12 Ways to Increase Your Influence at WorkGetSmarter
 
Ride the Storm: Navigating Through Unstable Periods / Katerina Rudko (Belka G...
Ride the Storm: Navigating Through Unstable Periods / Katerina Rudko (Belka G...Ride the Storm: Navigating Through Unstable Periods / Katerina Rudko (Belka G...
Ride the Storm: Navigating Through Unstable Periods / Katerina Rudko (Belka G...DevGAMM Conference
 

En vedette (20)

Skeleton Culture Code
Skeleton Culture CodeSkeleton Culture Code
Skeleton Culture Code
 
PEPSICO Presentation to CAGNY Conference Feb 2024
PEPSICO Presentation to CAGNY Conference Feb 2024PEPSICO Presentation to CAGNY Conference Feb 2024
PEPSICO Presentation to CAGNY Conference Feb 2024
 
Content Methodology: A Best Practices Report (Webinar)
Content Methodology: A Best Practices Report (Webinar)Content Methodology: A Best Practices Report (Webinar)
Content Methodology: A Best Practices Report (Webinar)
 
How to Prepare For a Successful Job Search for 2024
How to Prepare For a Successful Job Search for 2024How to Prepare For a Successful Job Search for 2024
How to Prepare For a Successful Job Search for 2024
 
Social Media Marketing Trends 2024 // The Global Indie Insights
Social Media Marketing Trends 2024 // The Global Indie InsightsSocial Media Marketing Trends 2024 // The Global Indie Insights
Social Media Marketing Trends 2024 // The Global Indie Insights
 
Trends In Paid Search: Navigating The Digital Landscape In 2024
Trends In Paid Search: Navigating The Digital Landscape In 2024Trends In Paid Search: Navigating The Digital Landscape In 2024
Trends In Paid Search: Navigating The Digital Landscape In 2024
 
5 Public speaking tips from TED - Visualized summary
5 Public speaking tips from TED - Visualized summary5 Public speaking tips from TED - Visualized summary
5 Public speaking tips from TED - Visualized summary
 
ChatGPT and the Future of Work - Clark Boyd
ChatGPT and the Future of Work - Clark Boyd ChatGPT and the Future of Work - Clark Boyd
ChatGPT and the Future of Work - Clark Boyd
 
Getting into the tech field. what next
Getting into the tech field. what next Getting into the tech field. what next
Getting into the tech field. what next
 
Google's Just Not That Into You: Understanding Core Updates & Search Intent
Google's Just Not That Into You: Understanding Core Updates & Search IntentGoogle's Just Not That Into You: Understanding Core Updates & Search Intent
Google's Just Not That Into You: Understanding Core Updates & Search Intent
 
How to have difficult conversations
How to have difficult conversations How to have difficult conversations
How to have difficult conversations
 
Introduction to Data Science
Introduction to Data ScienceIntroduction to Data Science
Introduction to Data Science
 
Time Management & Productivity - Best Practices
Time Management & Productivity -  Best PracticesTime Management & Productivity -  Best Practices
Time Management & Productivity - Best Practices
 
The six step guide to practical project management
The six step guide to practical project managementThe six step guide to practical project management
The six step guide to practical project management
 
Beginners Guide to TikTok for Search - Rachel Pearson - We are Tilt __ Bright...
Beginners Guide to TikTok for Search - Rachel Pearson - We are Tilt __ Bright...Beginners Guide to TikTok for Search - Rachel Pearson - We are Tilt __ Bright...
Beginners Guide to TikTok for Search - Rachel Pearson - We are Tilt __ Bright...
 
Unlocking the Power of ChatGPT and AI in Testing - A Real-World Look, present...
Unlocking the Power of ChatGPT and AI in Testing - A Real-World Look, present...Unlocking the Power of ChatGPT and AI in Testing - A Real-World Look, present...
Unlocking the Power of ChatGPT and AI in Testing - A Real-World Look, present...
 
12 Ways to Increase Your Influence at Work
12 Ways to Increase Your Influence at Work12 Ways to Increase Your Influence at Work
12 Ways to Increase Your Influence at Work
 
ChatGPT webinar slides
ChatGPT webinar slidesChatGPT webinar slides
ChatGPT webinar slides
 
More than Just Lines on a Map: Best Practices for U.S Bike Routes
More than Just Lines on a Map: Best Practices for U.S Bike RoutesMore than Just Lines on a Map: Best Practices for U.S Bike Routes
More than Just Lines on a Map: Best Practices for U.S Bike Routes
 
Ride the Storm: Navigating Through Unstable Periods / Katerina Rudko (Belka G...
Ride the Storm: Navigating Through Unstable Periods / Katerina Rudko (Belka G...Ride the Storm: Navigating Through Unstable Periods / Katerina Rudko (Belka G...
Ride the Storm: Navigating Through Unstable Periods / Katerina Rudko (Belka G...
 

Amira Hamdy Moh Hamdy (71766), IDD_2014-10-06 - Term Record

  • 1. RCC Institute of Technology A Division of Yorkville University Date: 2/1/2016 2000 Steeles Ave West Concord, ON L4K 4N1 http://www.rccit.ca/ Total Pages: 3 Student: Amira Hamdy Moh Hamdy (71766) School: Toronto Film School Program: Interior Decorating Award: Enroll Status: ACTIVE Start Date: 10/6/2014 LDA: 2/1/2016 Transfer/Test Out Credits FAB1001 Professional Communications University of Modern Sciences & Arts: Hon BA Mass Communication(Advertising & PR); 0.00 3.00 P 0.00 FAT1151 Computer Applications University for Modern Sciences & Arts: CS100 Introduction to Intormation Technology; 0.00 2.00 TC 0.00 Term: Fall 2014 Term Start: 10/6/2014 Term End: 12/28/2014 Course Code Course Description Faculty Credits Attempted Credits Earned Grade Date Completed GPA Omit FAB1001 Professional Communications Doris Montanera 3.00 3.00 P (201) 10/6/2014 TG IDD110 Introduction to Interior Decorating Tracy O'Brien 3.00 3.00 A (87) 12/28/2014 IDD111 Colour Theory Susan Anderson 3.00 3.00 A+ (95) 12/28/2014 IDD112 Drafting 1 Tracy O'Brien 3.00 3.00 B+ (79.4) 12/28/2014 IDD113 Freehand Drawing Jeff Cairns 3.00 3.00 A- (84.6) 12/28/2014 IDD114 History of Design Deanna Georgeson 3.00 3.00 A+ (93) 12/28/2014 SS101 Student Success Seminar Jeff Cairns 0.00 0.00 S (206) 12/28/2014 T Term GPA: 3.92 Total Credits Attempted: 15.00 Cum GPA: 3.92 Term Credits Earned: 15.00/15.00 End Status: President's List, Honours List Cum Credits Earned: 15.00/20.00 Term: Winter 2015 Term Start: 1/5/2015 Term End: 3/29/2015 Course Code Course Description Faculty Credits Attempted Credits Earned Grade Date Completed GPA Omit IDD211 Drafting 2 Tracy O'Brien 3.00 3.00 A+ (90.5) 3/29/2015 IDD212 Human Factors and Space Planning Tracy O'Brien 3.00 3.00 A (85.6) 3/29/2015 IDD213 History of Art 1 Alec Steinwall 3.00 3.00 A+ (90.6) 3/29/2015 IDD214 Materials and Textiles Tracy O'Brien 3.00 3.00 A+ (92.7) 3/29/2015 IDD215 Visual Communications 1 Jeff Cairns 3.00 3.00 A+ (92.5) 3/29/2015 IDDW201 Studio Workshop 1 Pheinixx Paul 3.00 3.00 S (206) 3/29/2015 TG IDT210 Digital Design 1 Milorad Eftoski 3.00 3.00 A (86) 3/29/2015 Term GPA: 4.20 Total Credits Attempted: 21.00 Cum GPA: 4.07 Term Credits Earned: 18.00/21.00 End Status: President's List, Honours List Cum Credits Earned: 33.00/41.00 Term: Spring 2015 Term Start: 4/6/2015 Term End: 6/28/2015 Course Code Course Description Faculty Credits Attempted Credits Earned Grade Date Completed GPA Omit IDD311 CADD 1 Sancho Bustamante 3.00 3.00 A+ (90) 6/28/2015 IDD312 Design Studio 1 Sabrina Di Maio 3.00 3.00 A+ (91.4) 6/28/2015 IDD313 History of Art 2 Matthew Stasyna 3.00 3.00 A (88) 6/28/2015 IDD314 Home Staging Sabrina Di Maio 3.00 3.00 A+ (90.5) 6/28/2015 IDD315 Visual Communications 2 Jeff Cairns 3.00 3.00 A+ (91) 6/28/2015 IDDW416 Studio Workshop 2 Candace Sharma 2.00 2.00 S (206) 6/28/2015 TG IDT310 Digital Design 2 Sancho Bustamante 2.00 2.00 A+ (90) 6/28/2015 Term GPA: 4.25 Total Credits Attempted: 19.00 Cum GPA: 4.13 Term Credits Earned: 17.00/19.00 End Status: President's List, Honours List Cum Credits Earned: 50.00/60.00 *** End of Data: Page 1 ***
  • 2. GRADING SCHEMA: RCC Institute of Technology (4.3) Grade Range Points Description S N/A Satisfactory Course Completion (not included in GPA) A+ 90.0% - 100.0% 4.3 Excellent or outstanding performance in relation to expected learning outcomes for the course or subject. A 85.0% - 89.9% 4 Excellent or outstanding performance in relation to expected learning outcomes for the course or subject. A- 80.0% - 84.9% 3.7 Excellent or outstanding performance in relation to expected learning outcomes for the course or subject. B+ 77.0% - 79.9% 3.3 Good performance in relation to expected learning outcomes for the course or subject. B 73.0% - 76.9% 3 Good performance in relation to expected learning outcomes for the course or subject. B- 70.0% - 72.9% 2.7 Good performance in relation to expected learning outcomes for the course or subject. C+ 67.0% - 69.9% 2.3 Satisfactory performance in relation to expected learning outcomes for the course or subject. C 63.0% - 66.9% 2 Satisfactory performance in relation to expected learning outcomes for the course or subject. C- 60.0% - 62.9% 1.7 Satisfactory performance in relation to expected learning outcomes for the course or subject. D+ 57.0% - 59.9% 1.3 Minimally acceptable performance in relation to expected learning outcomes for the course or subject. D 53.0% - 56.9% 1 Minimally acceptable performance in relation to expected learning outcomes for the course or subject. D- 50.0% - 52.9% 0.7 Minimally acceptable performance in relation to expected learning outcomes for the course or subject. F 35.0% - 49.9% 0 Does not demonstrated the minimally acceptable performance in relation to the expected learning outcomes for the course or subject. F 0.0% - 34.9% 0 Does not demonstrated the minimally acceptable performance in relation to the expected learning outcomes for the course or subject. U N/A Unsatisfactory Course Completion (not included in GPA) W N/A Withdrawal RCC Institute of Technology (4.3), Effective Jan 2014 Grade Range Points Description S N/A Satisfactory Course Completion (not included in GPA) A+ 90.0% - 100.0% 4.3 Excellent or outstanding performance in relation to expected learning outcomes for the course or subject. A 85.0% - 89.9% 4 Excellent or outstanding performance in relation to expected learning outcomes for the course or subject. A- 80.0% - 84.9% 3.7 Excellent or outstanding performance in relation to expected learning outcomes for the course or subject. B+ 77.0% - 79.9% 3.3 Good performance in relation to expected learning outcomes for the course or subject. B 73.0% - 76.9% 3 Good performance in relation to expected learning outcomes for the course or subject. B- 70.0% - 72.9% 2.7 Good performance in relation to expected learning outcomes for the course or subject. C+ 67.0% - 69.9% 2.3 Satisfactory performance in relation to expected learning outcomes for the course or subject. C 63.0% - 66.9% 2 Satisfactory performance in relation to expected learning outcomes for the course or subject. C- 60.0% - 62.9% 1.7 Satisfactory performance in relation to expected learning outcomes for the course or subject. D+ 57.0% - 59.9% 1.3 Minimally acceptable performance in relation to expected learning outcomes for the course or subject. D 53.0% - 56.9% 1 Minimally acceptable performance in relation to expected learning outcomes for the course or subject. D- 50.0% - 52.9% 0.7 Minimally acceptable performance in relation to expected learning outcomes for the course or subject. F 35.0% - 49.9% 0 Does not demonstrated the minimally acceptable performance in relation to the expected learning outcomes for the course or subject. F 0.0% - 34.9% 0 Does not demonstrated the minimally acceptable performance in relation to the expected learning outcomes for the course or subject. U N/A Unsatisfactory Course Completion (not included in GPA) W N/A Withdrawal Toronto Film School (4.3), Effective Jan 2015 Grade Range Points Description S N/A Satisfactory Course Completion (not included in GPA) A+ 90.0% - 100.0% 4.3 Excellent or outstanding performance in relation to expected learning outcomes for the course or subject. A 85.0% - 89.9% 4 Excellent or outstanding performance in relation to expected learning outcomes for the course or subject. A- 80.0% - 84.9% 3.7 Excellent or outstanding performance in relation to expected learning outcomes for the course or subject. B+ 77.0% - 79.9% 3.3 Good performance in relation to expected learning outcomes for the course or subject. B 73.0% - 76.9% 3 Good performance in relation to expected learning outcomes for the course or subject. B- 70.0% - 72.9% 2.7 Good performance in relation to expected learning outcomes for the course or subject. C+ 67.0% - 69.9% 2.3 Satisfactory performance in relation to expected learning outcomes for the course or subject. C 63.0% - 66.9% 2 Satisfactory performance in relation to expected learning outcomes for the course or subject. C- 60.0% - 62.9% 1.7 Satisfactory performance in relation to expected learning outcomes for the course or subject. D+ 57.0% - 59.9% 1.3 Minimally acceptable performance in relation to expected learning outcomes for the course or subject. D 53.0% - 56.9% 1 Minimally acceptable performance in relation to expected learning outcomes for the course or subject. D- 50.0% - 52.9% 0.7 Minimally acceptable performance in relation to expected learning outcomes for the course or subject. F 35.0% - 49.9% 0 Does not demonstrated the minimally acceptable performance in relation to the expected learning outcomes for the course or subject. F 0.0% - 34.9% 0 Does not demonstrated the minimally acceptable performance in relation to the expected learning outcomes for the course or subject. U N/A Unsatisfactory Course Completion (not included in GPA) W N/A Withdrawal TERM & CUMULATIVE CREDITS EARNED The term and cumulative credits earned totals indicate two values: The first value indicates the total credits earned from courses that are part of the Program of Study. The second value, in italic text, indicates the total credits earned from all courses taken (not including transfer credits or proficiency credits. GPA OMIT DESIGNATORS
  • 3. TT or T: Non-credit course. TG: Credits earned are not included in the GPA TN: Course is not part of the student program of study TC: Course has been replaced with a different Course ID, replacement course mark is higher TR: Course has been retaken and the retake mark is higher TE: Course has not yet been completed, this mark is a progress mark and is not final
  • 4. RCC Institute of Technology A Division of Yorkville University Date: 2/1/2016 2000 Steeles Ave West Concord, ON L4K 4N1 http://www.rccit.ca/ Total Pages: 3 Student: Amira Hamdy Moh Hamdy (71766) School: Toronto Film School Program: Interior Decorating Award: Enroll Status: ACTIVE Start Date: 10/6/2014 LDA: 2/1/2016 Term: Summer 2015 Term Start: 7/6/2015 Term End: 9/27/2015 Course Code Course Description Faculty Credits Attempted Credits Earned Grade Date Completed GPA Omit IDD411 CADD 2 Michael Guido 3.00 3.00 A+ (94.3) 9/27/2015 IDD412 Design Studio 2 David Renn 3.00 3.00 A+ (100) 9/27/2015 IDD413 Lighting Nihan Basak 3.00 3.00 A+ (100) 9/27/2015 IDD414 Styling Spaces Sabrina Di Maio 3.00 3.00 A+ (94.4) 9/27/2015 IDD415 Visual Communications 3 Jeff Cairns 3.00 3.00 A+ (92.5) 9/27/2015 IDD511 Building Systems an Introduction Sabrina Di Maio 2.00 2.00 A+ (90.8) 9/27/2015 IDDW516 Studio Workshop 3 Sabrina Di Maio 3.00 3.00 S (206) 9/27/2015 TG Term GPA: 4.30 Total Credits Attempted: 20.00 Cum GPA: 4.17 Term Credits Earned: 17.00/20.00 End Status: President's List, Honours List Cum Credits Earned: 67.00/80.00 Term: Fall 2015 Term Start: 10/5/2015 Term End: 12/27/2015 Course Code Course Description Faculty Credits Attempted Credits Earned Grade Date Completed GPA Omit IDD316 Image Presentation Sabrina Di Maio 2.00 2.00 S (206) 12/27/2015 TG Term GPA: 0.00 Total Credits Attempted: 2.00 Cum GPA: 4.14 Term Credits Earned: 0.00/2.00 End Status: Cum Credits Earned: 84.00/99.00 Term: Fall 2015 Term Start: 10/5/2015 Term End: 12/27/2015 Course Code Course Description Faculty Credits Attempted Credits Earned Grade Date Completed GPA Omit IDD410 Interior Specifications Michael Guido 2.00 2.00 A+ (90) 12/27/2015 IDD512 Design Studio 3 Sabrina Di Maio 3.00 3.00 A- (84) 12/27/2015 IDD513 History of Furniture and Decoration Nihan Basak 3.00 3.00 A+ (91) 12/27/2015 IDD514 Professional Practice 1 Candace Sharma 3.00 3.00 A- (82) 12/27/2015 IDD515 Visual Merchandising Jeff Cairns 3.00 3.00 A+ (94) 12/27/2015 IDT510 Digital Design in 3D Martin Radikov 3.00 3.00 A- (84) 12/27/2015 Term GPA: 3.98 Total Credits Attempted: 17.00 Cum GPA: 4.14 Term Credits Earned: 17.00/17.00 End Status: President's List, Honours List Cum Credits Earned: 84.00/97.00 *** End of Data: Page 2 ***
  • 5. GRADING SCHEMA: RCC Institute of Technology (4.3) Grade Range Points Description S N/A Satisfactory Course Completion (not included in GPA) A+ 90.0% - 100.0% 4.3 Excellent or outstanding performance in relation to expected learning outcomes for the course or subject. A 85.0% - 89.9% 4 Excellent or outstanding performance in relation to expected learning outcomes for the course or subject. A- 80.0% - 84.9% 3.7 Excellent or outstanding performance in relation to expected learning outcomes for the course or subject. B+ 77.0% - 79.9% 3.3 Good performance in relation to expected learning outcomes for the course or subject. B 73.0% - 76.9% 3 Good performance in relation to expected learning outcomes for the course or subject. B- 70.0% - 72.9% 2.7 Good performance in relation to expected learning outcomes for the course or subject. C+ 67.0% - 69.9% 2.3 Satisfactory performance in relation to expected learning outcomes for the course or subject. C 63.0% - 66.9% 2 Satisfactory performance in relation to expected learning outcomes for the course or subject. C- 60.0% - 62.9% 1.7 Satisfactory performance in relation to expected learning outcomes for the course or subject. D+ 57.0% - 59.9% 1.3 Minimally acceptable performance in relation to expected learning outcomes for the course or subject. D 53.0% - 56.9% 1 Minimally acceptable performance in relation to expected learning outcomes for the course or subject. D- 50.0% - 52.9% 0.7 Minimally acceptable performance in relation to expected learning outcomes for the course or subject. F 35.0% - 49.9% 0 Does not demonstrated the minimally acceptable performance in relation to the expected learning outcomes for the course or subject. F 0.0% - 34.9% 0 Does not demonstrated the minimally acceptable performance in relation to the expected learning outcomes for the course or subject. U N/A Unsatisfactory Course Completion (not included in GPA) W N/A Withdrawal RCC Institute of Technology (4.3), Effective Jan 2014 Grade Range Points Description S N/A Satisfactory Course Completion (not included in GPA) A+ 90.0% - 100.0% 4.3 Excellent or outstanding performance in relation to expected learning outcomes for the course or subject. A 85.0% - 89.9% 4 Excellent or outstanding performance in relation to expected learning outcomes for the course or subject. A- 80.0% - 84.9% 3.7 Excellent or outstanding performance in relation to expected learning outcomes for the course or subject. B+ 77.0% - 79.9% 3.3 Good performance in relation to expected learning outcomes for the course or subject. B 73.0% - 76.9% 3 Good performance in relation to expected learning outcomes for the course or subject. B- 70.0% - 72.9% 2.7 Good performance in relation to expected learning outcomes for the course or subject. C+ 67.0% - 69.9% 2.3 Satisfactory performance in relation to expected learning outcomes for the course or subject. C 63.0% - 66.9% 2 Satisfactory performance in relation to expected learning outcomes for the course or subject. C- 60.0% - 62.9% 1.7 Satisfactory performance in relation to expected learning outcomes for the course or subject. D+ 57.0% - 59.9% 1.3 Minimally acceptable performance in relation to expected learning outcomes for the course or subject. D 53.0% - 56.9% 1 Minimally acceptable performance in relation to expected learning outcomes for the course or subject. D- 50.0% - 52.9% 0.7 Minimally acceptable performance in relation to expected learning outcomes for the course or subject. F 35.0% - 49.9% 0 Does not demonstrated the minimally acceptable performance in relation to the expected learning outcomes for the course or subject. F 0.0% - 34.9% 0 Does not demonstrated the minimally acceptable performance in relation to the expected learning outcomes for the course or subject. U N/A Unsatisfactory Course Completion (not included in GPA) W N/A Withdrawal Toronto Film School (4.3), Effective Jan 2015 Grade Range Points Description S N/A Satisfactory Course Completion (not included in GPA) A+ 90.0% - 100.0% 4.3 Excellent or outstanding performance in relation to expected learning outcomes for the course or subject. A 85.0% - 89.9% 4 Excellent or outstanding performance in relation to expected learning outcomes for the course or subject. A- 80.0% - 84.9% 3.7 Excellent or outstanding performance in relation to expected learning outcomes for the course or subject. B+ 77.0% - 79.9% 3.3 Good performance in relation to expected learning outcomes for the course or subject. B 73.0% - 76.9% 3 Good performance in relation to expected learning outcomes for the course or subject. B- 70.0% - 72.9% 2.7 Good performance in relation to expected learning outcomes for the course or subject. C+ 67.0% - 69.9% 2.3 Satisfactory performance in relation to expected learning outcomes for the course or subject. C 63.0% - 66.9% 2 Satisfactory performance in relation to expected learning outcomes for the course or subject. C- 60.0% - 62.9% 1.7 Satisfactory performance in relation to expected learning outcomes for the course or subject. D+ 57.0% - 59.9% 1.3 Minimally acceptable performance in relation to expected learning outcomes for the course or subject. D 53.0% - 56.9% 1 Minimally acceptable performance in relation to expected learning outcomes for the course or subject. D- 50.0% - 52.9% 0.7 Minimally acceptable performance in relation to expected learning outcomes for the course or subject. F 35.0% - 49.9% 0 Does not demonstrated the minimally acceptable performance in relation to the expected learning outcomes for the course or subject. F 0.0% - 34.9% 0 Does not demonstrated the minimally acceptable performance in relation to the expected learning outcomes for the course or subject. U N/A Unsatisfactory Course Completion (not included in GPA) W N/A Withdrawal TERM & CUMULATIVE CREDITS EARNED The term and cumulative credits earned totals indicate two values: The first value indicates the total credits earned from courses that are part of the Program of Study. The second value, in italic text, indicates the total credits earned from all courses taken (not including transfer credits or proficiency credits. GPA OMIT DESIGNATORS
  • 6. TT or T: Non-credit course. TG: Credits earned are not included in the GPA TN: Course is not part of the student program of study TC: Course has been replaced with a different Course ID, replacement course mark is higher TR: Course has been retaken and the retake mark is higher TE: Course has not yet been completed, this mark is a progress mark and is not final
  • 7. RCC Institute of Technology A Division of Yorkville University Date: 2/1/2016 2000 Steeles Ave West Concord, ON L4K 4N1 http://www.rccit.ca/ Total Pages: 3 Student: Amira Hamdy Moh Hamdy (71766) School: Toronto Film School Program: Interior Decorating Award: Enroll Status: ACTIVE Start Date: 10/6/2014 LDA: 2/1/2016 Term: Winter 2016 Term Start: 1/11/2016 Term End: 4/3/2016 Course Code Course Description Faculty Credits Attempted Credits Earned Grade Date Completed GPA Omit IDD610 Construction Drawings Jeff Wong 3.00 0.00 A (85) 3/27/2016 TE IDD611 Portfolio Presentation Martyn Lee 3.00 0.00 A+ (93.3) 3/27/2016 TE IDD612 Design Thesis Sabrina Di Maio 3.00 0.00 B (75) 3/27/2016 TE IDD614 Professional Practice 2 Candace Sharma 2.00 0.00 B (75) 3/27/2016 TE IDD613 Sustainable Materials and Finishes 3.00 0.00 EN (205) 4/3/2016 TE IDDW615 Studio Workshop 4 3.00 0.00 EN (205) 4/3/2016 TE Term GPA: 0.00 Total Credits Attempted: 17.00 Cum GPA: 4.14 Term Credits Earned: 0.00/0.00 End Status: Cum Credits Earned: 84.00/99.00 *** End of Data: Page 3 ***
  • 8. GRADING SCHEMA: RCC Institute of Technology (4.3) Grade Range Points Description S N/A Satisfactory Course Completion (not included in GPA) A+ 90.0% - 100.0% 4.3 Excellent or outstanding performance in relation to expected learning outcomes for the course or subject. A 85.0% - 89.9% 4 Excellent or outstanding performance in relation to expected learning outcomes for the course or subject. A- 80.0% - 84.9% 3.7 Excellent or outstanding performance in relation to expected learning outcomes for the course or subject. B+ 77.0% - 79.9% 3.3 Good performance in relation to expected learning outcomes for the course or subject. B 73.0% - 76.9% 3 Good performance in relation to expected learning outcomes for the course or subject. B- 70.0% - 72.9% 2.7 Good performance in relation to expected learning outcomes for the course or subject. C+ 67.0% - 69.9% 2.3 Satisfactory performance in relation to expected learning outcomes for the course or subject. C 63.0% - 66.9% 2 Satisfactory performance in relation to expected learning outcomes for the course or subject. C- 60.0% - 62.9% 1.7 Satisfactory performance in relation to expected learning outcomes for the course or subject. D+ 57.0% - 59.9% 1.3 Minimally acceptable performance in relation to expected learning outcomes for the course or subject. D 53.0% - 56.9% 1 Minimally acceptable performance in relation to expected learning outcomes for the course or subject. D- 50.0% - 52.9% 0.7 Minimally acceptable performance in relation to expected learning outcomes for the course or subject. F 35.0% - 49.9% 0 Does not demonstrated the minimally acceptable performance in relation to the expected learning outcomes for the course or subject. F 0.0% - 34.9% 0 Does not demonstrated the minimally acceptable performance in relation to the expected learning outcomes for the course or subject. U N/A Unsatisfactory Course Completion (not included in GPA) W N/A Withdrawal RCC Institute of Technology (4.3), Effective Jan 2014 Grade Range Points Description S N/A Satisfactory Course Completion (not included in GPA) A+ 90.0% - 100.0% 4.3 Excellent or outstanding performance in relation to expected learning outcomes for the course or subject. A 85.0% - 89.9% 4 Excellent or outstanding performance in relation to expected learning outcomes for the course or subject. A- 80.0% - 84.9% 3.7 Excellent or outstanding performance in relation to expected learning outcomes for the course or subject. B+ 77.0% - 79.9% 3.3 Good performance in relation to expected learning outcomes for the course or subject. B 73.0% - 76.9% 3 Good performance in relation to expected learning outcomes for the course or subject. B- 70.0% - 72.9% 2.7 Good performance in relation to expected learning outcomes for the course or subject. C+ 67.0% - 69.9% 2.3 Satisfactory performance in relation to expected learning outcomes for the course or subject. C 63.0% - 66.9% 2 Satisfactory performance in relation to expected learning outcomes for the course or subject. C- 60.0% - 62.9% 1.7 Satisfactory performance in relation to expected learning outcomes for the course or subject. D+ 57.0% - 59.9% 1.3 Minimally acceptable performance in relation to expected learning outcomes for the course or subject. D 53.0% - 56.9% 1 Minimally acceptable performance in relation to expected learning outcomes for the course or subject. D- 50.0% - 52.9% 0.7 Minimally acceptable performance in relation to expected learning outcomes for the course or subject. F 35.0% - 49.9% 0 Does not demonstrated the minimally acceptable performance in relation to the expected learning outcomes for the course or subject. F 0.0% - 34.9% 0 Does not demonstrated the minimally acceptable performance in relation to the expected learning outcomes for the course or subject. U N/A Unsatisfactory Course Completion (not included in GPA) W N/A Withdrawal Toronto Film School (4.3), Effective Jan 2015 Grade Range Points Description S N/A Satisfactory Course Completion (not included in GPA) A+ 90.0% - 100.0% 4.3 Excellent or outstanding performance in relation to expected learning outcomes for the course or subject. A 85.0% - 89.9% 4 Excellent or outstanding performance in relation to expected learning outcomes for the course or subject. A- 80.0% - 84.9% 3.7 Excellent or outstanding performance in relation to expected learning outcomes for the course or subject. B+ 77.0% - 79.9% 3.3 Good performance in relation to expected learning outcomes for the course or subject. B 73.0% - 76.9% 3 Good performance in relation to expected learning outcomes for the course or subject. B- 70.0% - 72.9% 2.7 Good performance in relation to expected learning outcomes for the course or subject. C+ 67.0% - 69.9% 2.3 Satisfactory performance in relation to expected learning outcomes for the course or subject. C 63.0% - 66.9% 2 Satisfactory performance in relation to expected learning outcomes for the course or subject. C- 60.0% - 62.9% 1.7 Satisfactory performance in relation to expected learning outcomes for the course or subject. D+ 57.0% - 59.9% 1.3 Minimally acceptable performance in relation to expected learning outcomes for the course or subject. D 53.0% - 56.9% 1 Minimally acceptable performance in relation to expected learning outcomes for the course or subject. D- 50.0% - 52.9% 0.7 Minimally acceptable performance in relation to expected learning outcomes for the course or subject. F 35.0% - 49.9% 0 Does not demonstrated the minimally acceptable performance in relation to the expected learning outcomes for the course or subject. F 0.0% - 34.9% 0 Does not demonstrated the minimally acceptable performance in relation to the expected learning outcomes for the course or subject. U N/A Unsatisfactory Course Completion (not included in GPA) W N/A Withdrawal TERM & CUMULATIVE CREDITS EARNED The term and cumulative credits earned totals indicate two values: The first value indicates the total credits earned from courses that are part of the Program of Study. The second value, in italic text, indicates the total credits earned from all courses taken (not including transfer credits or proficiency credits. GPA OMIT DESIGNATORS
  • 9. TT or T: Non-credit course. TG: Credits earned are not included in the GPA TN: Course is not part of the student program of study TC: Course has been replaced with a different Course ID, replacement course mark is higher TR: Course has been retaken and the retake mark is higher TE: Course has not yet been completed, this mark is a progress mark and is not final