SlideShare une entreprise Scribd logo
1  sur  1
Télécharger pour lire hors ligne
Measure:
Financial resource
Energy consumption
Conditions of mobility
Threshold:
Per factor / Across factors
Identify:
Disadvantageous
combinations of factors
Number of
households
% of population
0.5 millions 1,8!%
2.9 millions 11.7!%
0.9 million 3.7!%
Equation:
Threshold:
2x median
Fuel spending
Income
Identify:
Disproportionate share of
income spent on fuel
Number of
households
% of
population
RATIO 2.6 millions 10,5!%
RATIO/IP 0.5 million 2.0!%
Equation:
Fuel spending
Number of active
individuals
Income - Fuel spending
Number of
consumption units
Identify:
High fuel
spending
Low residual
income
Threshold:
Median 60% median
Number of
households
% of
population
LIHC 840 000 3,3%
Investigating fuel poverty in the transport sector:
Toward a composite indicator of vulnerability
€
€
€
Limits:
Audrey Berry*1
, Yves Jouffe2
, Nicolas Coulombel3
, Céline Guivarch1
1
Centre International de la Recherche sur l’Environnement et le Développement, 45 Avenue de la Belle Gabrielle 94130 Nogent-sur-Marne, France
2
Lab' Urba, Université Paris-Est Marne-la-Vallée, 5 Boulevard Descartes 77420 Champs-sur-Marne, France
3
Laboratoire Ville Mobilité Transport, Université Paris-Est Marne-la-Vallée, 5 Boulevard Descartes 77420 Champs-sur-Marne, France
* First author: berry@centre-cired.fr
A ratio indicatoris the official way of counting
fuel poor in France for the domestic sector today. It is
advantageous for its simplicity. Applied to the transport
sector, we find 10.5% of French households are fuel poor,
meaning they spend more than 3.9% of their income on
buying fuel. Restricting the analysis to the most deprived
households, we find 2.0% are both fuel poor and income poor.
An approach that targets factors of vulnerabilities is called for,
with a new indicator measuring the different dimensions of the phenomenon.
Fuel poverty is when a houshold is unable to
afford an adequate amount of energy services
to satisfy its basic needs.
It is at the intersection of four key drivers:
Low income High fuel cost
Poor efficiency Disadvantageous location
What matters for evaluating fuel
poverty in the transport sector is to:
- recognise diverse mobility needs
- detect restricting behaviours
- evaluate households’ capacity to adapt
This variety of situations rouses debates
about which indicator(s) should be used to
evaluate fuel poverty. Yet the choice of
indicator leads to different policy choices.
+
These indicators bring a normative
approach to mobility:
But how to allow for diverse
mobility needs and practices
when considering what it is
‘reasonable’ for a given
household to spend on fuel?
Restriction and capacity to adapt
are not evaluated:
Don’t we miss essential features?
We propose a composite
indicator of three dimensions…
…identifying three levels of
exposition to rising fuel prices.
How?
By cumulating the factors in which a household is
affected, our composite indicator identifies the
population most exposed to a rise in fuel prices. It
follows the dual cut-off method developed by Alkire
and Foster. It employs two types of threshold: one
threshold is defined per factor to determine whether
that factor applies to the household, and the other
threshold is defined across factors.
Our composite indicator identifies 1.8% of
French households are fuel poor: they are income poor with a high
fuel spending (>64€/month/person) or restriction. We find a further
11.7% are fuel vulnerable: they show limited capacity to adapt
from a change in their current situation. (new-born baby, change
workplace, higher housing costs, etc.). We find a further 3.7% are
fuel dependent: with high committed spending such as loan
reimbursement or payment of children studies, they could be
negatively affected in their daily budget.
2000 4000 6000 8000
0100200300400500600
Households' fuel spending according to their income
Total income (€/household/month)
Totalfuelspending(€/household/month)
Income (€/month)
Fuelspending(€/month)
Fuel poor & income poor
(ratio)
= 2.0% of French households
Fuel poor (ratio)
= 10.5% of French households
{2x median ratio
= 3,9%
Households’ share of income spent on fuel
Combinations of factors (gather at least)
Financial resources Fuel consumption Conditions of mobility
Income
poor
Low
income
High
spending
Restriction
Poor spatial
matching
No
alternative
Low vehicle
performance
or No vehicle
x x Fuel
poor
Level of
exposition
x x
x x x
Fuel
vulnerable
x x x
x x x
x x x
Fuel
dependent
Dimensions Factors
Financial resources
Income poor
Low income
Fuel consumption
High spending
Restriction
Conditions of mobility
Poor spatial matching
No alternative
Low vehicle performance or No vehicle
Fuel
poor
Fuel
vulnerable
Fuel
dependent
We can transpose domestic fuel poverty indicators to the transport sector,
but transposed indicators are not satisfactory.
A composite indicator of vulnerability highlights the conditions of mobility
and reveals households’ exposition to rising fuel prices.
The LIHC* indicator is the official way of
counting fuel poor in the UK for the domestic sector. It has
the advantage to include households whose standard of
living is lowered because of their fuel spending. Applied
to the transport sector, we find 3.3% of French households
are fuel poor, meaning each person spends more than
32€/month on buying fuel and live below the poverty line.
Fuel poverty is also about transport: households that depend heavily on car use
for their daily trips are likely to face difficulties if fuel prices keep on rising.1
2
3
Our work is illustrated with a French case study.
Data from the National Transport Survey
(Enquête Nationale Transports et Déplacements)
Conducted by INSEE every 10-15 years, last available
from 2008
Interviewed a sample of 20 200 French households
Offers a detailed description of travel behaviors
(compared to BDF) at the national level (compared to
EMD)
Focus on places to work and study.
1000 2000 3000 4000 5000
0100200300400
Fuel poor identified with LIHC
Income per CU (€ monthly)
Fuelspendingperactiveindividual(€monthly)
Residual income per unit of consumption (€/month)
Fuelspendingperperson(€/month)
Households’ fuel spending per person
Fuel poor (LIHC)
= 3.3% of French households
Median spending
= 32€/month
Poverty line
= 950€/month
*Low Income High Cost
* To compare the standards of living of households of different sizes, we adjust income by the consumption unit (CU)
using the OECD equivalence scale: 1 CU for the first adult in the household, 0.5 CU for other adults, 0.3 CU for children.
*
! "!!! #!!! $!!! %!!! &!!!
!"!!#!!$!!%!!
'()(*+,-./,01,23456789
:;-(*8(,(*,<./=+/.*>,-./,.<>7?,23456789
Fuel vulnerable
= 11.7% of French households
Fuel dependent
= 3.7% of French households
Income per unit of consumption (€/month)
Fuelspendingperperson(€/month)
2x median spending
= 64€/month
Median income
= 1580€/month
Fuel poor
= 1.8% of French households
Poverty line
= 950€/month
Households’ fuel spending per person
International Scientific Conference “Our Common Future Under Climate Change”, Paris, July 2015, P-4413-01
*

Contenu connexe

Similaire à Poster OCF v11

Energy efficiency indicators in morocco aderee
Energy efficiency indicators in morocco adereeEnergy efficiency indicators in morocco aderee
Energy efficiency indicators in morocco adereeRCREEE
 
economic instruments
economic instruments economic instruments
economic instruments ICLEI
 
12 Sevenet & Imbert - The two faces of energy poverty
12 Sevenet & Imbert - The two faces of energy poverty12 Sevenet & Imbert - The two faces of energy poverty
12 Sevenet & Imbert - The two faces of energy poverty(t)ERES research project
 
OECD Green Talk Live: Taxing Energy Use - Reforming energy tax systems to ach...
OECD Green Talk Live: Taxing Energy Use - Reforming energy tax systems to ach...OECD Green Talk Live: Taxing Energy Use - Reforming energy tax systems to ach...
OECD Green Talk Live: Taxing Energy Use - Reforming energy tax systems to ach...OECDtax
 
Transportation Electrification in Vermont
Transportation Electrification in VermontTransportation Electrification in Vermont
Transportation Electrification in VermontEAN-VT
 
SEAI - National Energy Research and Policy Conference 2021 - Session 3
SEAI - National Energy Research and Policy Conference 2021 - Session 3SEAI - National Energy Research and Policy Conference 2021 - Session 3
SEAI - National Energy Research and Policy Conference 2021 - Session 3SustainableEnergyAut
 
International experiences with savings obligations / white certificates
International experiences with savings obligations / white certificates International experiences with savings obligations / white certificates
International experiences with savings obligations / white certificates IEA DSM Implementing Agreement (IA)
 
Washington’s Clean Fuel Standard by Janée Zakoren
Washington’s Clean Fuel Standard by Janée ZakorenWashington’s Clean Fuel Standard by Janée Zakoren
Washington’s Clean Fuel Standard by Janée ZakorenForth
 
Costa Rica Index Analysis
Costa Rica Index AnalysisCosta Rica Index Analysis
Costa Rica Index AnalysisPierluca Bracco
 
Cement and Concrete: From Linear to Circular
Cement and Concrete: From Linear to CircularCement and Concrete: From Linear to Circular
Cement and Concrete: From Linear to CircularCircular Economy Asia
 
Learning from emerging approaches - Carlos Munoz, Mexico
Learning from emerging approaches - Carlos Munoz, MexicoLearning from emerging approaches - Carlos Munoz, Mexico
Learning from emerging approaches - Carlos Munoz, MexicoOECD Governance
 
Green budgeting: what and why? - Carlos Munoz, Mexico
Green budgeting: what and why? - Carlos Munoz, MexicoGreen budgeting: what and why? - Carlos Munoz, Mexico
Green budgeting: what and why? - Carlos Munoz, MexicoOECD Governance
 
CAN-briefing-reverse-4sept (1)
CAN-briefing-reverse-4sept (1)CAN-briefing-reverse-4sept (1)
CAN-briefing-reverse-4sept (1)Maeve McLynn
 
Energy-Balance-and-Accounting-2023-2024-Part-I.pdf
Energy-Balance-and-Accounting-2023-2024-Part-I.pdfEnergy-Balance-and-Accounting-2023-2024-Part-I.pdf
Energy-Balance-and-Accounting-2023-2024-Part-I.pdfajamal6
 
Blackman Et Al Presentation Incidence Fuel Taxes
Blackman Et Al Presentation Incidence Fuel TaxesBlackman Et Al Presentation Incidence Fuel Taxes
Blackman Et Al Presentation Incidence Fuel Taxesa95osksj
 
Blackman Et Al Presentation Incidence Fuel Taxes
Blackman Et Al Presentation Incidence Fuel TaxesBlackman Et Al Presentation Incidence Fuel Taxes
Blackman Et Al Presentation Incidence Fuel Taxesa95osksj
 

Similaire à Poster OCF v11 (20)

Energy efficiency indicators in morocco aderee
Energy efficiency indicators in morocco adereeEnergy efficiency indicators in morocco aderee
Energy efficiency indicators in morocco aderee
 
economic instruments
economic instruments economic instruments
economic instruments
 
12 Sevenet & Imbert - The two faces of energy poverty
12 Sevenet & Imbert - The two faces of energy poverty12 Sevenet & Imbert - The two faces of energy poverty
12 Sevenet & Imbert - The two faces of energy poverty
 
OECD Green Talk Live: Taxing Energy Use - Reforming energy tax systems to ach...
OECD Green Talk Live: Taxing Energy Use - Reforming energy tax systems to ach...OECD Green Talk Live: Taxing Energy Use - Reforming energy tax systems to ach...
OECD Green Talk Live: Taxing Energy Use - Reforming energy tax systems to ach...
 
Transportation Electrification in Vermont
Transportation Electrification in VermontTransportation Electrification in Vermont
Transportation Electrification in Vermont
 
SEAI - National Energy Research and Policy Conference 2021 - Session 3
SEAI - National Energy Research and Policy Conference 2021 - Session 3SEAI - National Energy Research and Policy Conference 2021 - Session 3
SEAI - National Energy Research and Policy Conference 2021 - Session 3
 
International experiences with savings obligations / white certificates
International experiences with savings obligations / white certificates International experiences with savings obligations / white certificates
International experiences with savings obligations / white certificates
 
Transport Poverty - car related economic stress
Transport Poverty - car related economic stressTransport Poverty - car related economic stress
Transport Poverty - car related economic stress
 
Moving Cooler: Study Findings
Moving Cooler: Study FindingsMoving Cooler: Study Findings
Moving Cooler: Study Findings
 
Washington’s Clean Fuel Standard by Janée Zakoren
Washington’s Clean Fuel Standard by Janée ZakorenWashington’s Clean Fuel Standard by Janée Zakoren
Washington’s Clean Fuel Standard by Janée Zakoren
 
Costa Rica Index Analysis
Costa Rica Index AnalysisCosta Rica Index Analysis
Costa Rica Index Analysis
 
Cement and Concrete: From Linear to Circular
Cement and Concrete: From Linear to CircularCement and Concrete: From Linear to Circular
Cement and Concrete: From Linear to Circular
 
CO2 emissions - Parliamentary Days 2014
CO2 emissions - Parliamentary Days 2014CO2 emissions - Parliamentary Days 2014
CO2 emissions - Parliamentary Days 2014
 
Learning from emerging approaches - Carlos Munoz, Mexico
Learning from emerging approaches - Carlos Munoz, MexicoLearning from emerging approaches - Carlos Munoz, Mexico
Learning from emerging approaches - Carlos Munoz, Mexico
 
Green budgeting: what and why? - Carlos Munoz, Mexico
Green budgeting: what and why? - Carlos Munoz, MexicoGreen budgeting: what and why? - Carlos Munoz, Mexico
Green budgeting: what and why? - Carlos Munoz, Mexico
 
CAN-briefing-reverse-4sept (1)
CAN-briefing-reverse-4sept (1)CAN-briefing-reverse-4sept (1)
CAN-briefing-reverse-4sept (1)
 
Social tariffs for water and waste services
Social tariffs for water and waste servicesSocial tariffs for water and waste services
Social tariffs for water and waste services
 
Energy-Balance-and-Accounting-2023-2024-Part-I.pdf
Energy-Balance-and-Accounting-2023-2024-Part-I.pdfEnergy-Balance-and-Accounting-2023-2024-Part-I.pdf
Energy-Balance-and-Accounting-2023-2024-Part-I.pdf
 
Blackman Et Al Presentation Incidence Fuel Taxes
Blackman Et Al Presentation Incidence Fuel TaxesBlackman Et Al Presentation Incidence Fuel Taxes
Blackman Et Al Presentation Incidence Fuel Taxes
 
Blackman Et Al Presentation Incidence Fuel Taxes
Blackman Et Al Presentation Incidence Fuel TaxesBlackman Et Al Presentation Incidence Fuel Taxes
Blackman Et Al Presentation Incidence Fuel Taxes
 

Poster OCF v11

  • 1. Measure: Financial resource Energy consumption Conditions of mobility Threshold: Per factor / Across factors Identify: Disadvantageous combinations of factors Number of households % of population 0.5 millions 1,8!% 2.9 millions 11.7!% 0.9 million 3.7!% Equation: Threshold: 2x median Fuel spending Income Identify: Disproportionate share of income spent on fuel Number of households % of population RATIO 2.6 millions 10,5!% RATIO/IP 0.5 million 2.0!% Equation: Fuel spending Number of active individuals Income - Fuel spending Number of consumption units Identify: High fuel spending Low residual income Threshold: Median 60% median Number of households % of population LIHC 840 000 3,3% Investigating fuel poverty in the transport sector: Toward a composite indicator of vulnerability € € € Limits: Audrey Berry*1 , Yves Jouffe2 , Nicolas Coulombel3 , Céline Guivarch1 1 Centre International de la Recherche sur l’Environnement et le Développement, 45 Avenue de la Belle Gabrielle 94130 Nogent-sur-Marne, France 2 Lab' Urba, Université Paris-Est Marne-la-Vallée, 5 Boulevard Descartes 77420 Champs-sur-Marne, France 3 Laboratoire Ville Mobilité Transport, Université Paris-Est Marne-la-Vallée, 5 Boulevard Descartes 77420 Champs-sur-Marne, France * First author: berry@centre-cired.fr A ratio indicatoris the official way of counting fuel poor in France for the domestic sector today. It is advantageous for its simplicity. Applied to the transport sector, we find 10.5% of French households are fuel poor, meaning they spend more than 3.9% of their income on buying fuel. Restricting the analysis to the most deprived households, we find 2.0% are both fuel poor and income poor. An approach that targets factors of vulnerabilities is called for, with a new indicator measuring the different dimensions of the phenomenon. Fuel poverty is when a houshold is unable to afford an adequate amount of energy services to satisfy its basic needs. It is at the intersection of four key drivers: Low income High fuel cost Poor efficiency Disadvantageous location What matters for evaluating fuel poverty in the transport sector is to: - recognise diverse mobility needs - detect restricting behaviours - evaluate households’ capacity to adapt This variety of situations rouses debates about which indicator(s) should be used to evaluate fuel poverty. Yet the choice of indicator leads to different policy choices. + These indicators bring a normative approach to mobility: But how to allow for diverse mobility needs and practices when considering what it is ‘reasonable’ for a given household to spend on fuel? Restriction and capacity to adapt are not evaluated: Don’t we miss essential features? We propose a composite indicator of three dimensions… …identifying three levels of exposition to rising fuel prices. How? By cumulating the factors in which a household is affected, our composite indicator identifies the population most exposed to a rise in fuel prices. It follows the dual cut-off method developed by Alkire and Foster. It employs two types of threshold: one threshold is defined per factor to determine whether that factor applies to the household, and the other threshold is defined across factors. Our composite indicator identifies 1.8% of French households are fuel poor: they are income poor with a high fuel spending (>64€/month/person) or restriction. We find a further 11.7% are fuel vulnerable: they show limited capacity to adapt from a change in their current situation. (new-born baby, change workplace, higher housing costs, etc.). We find a further 3.7% are fuel dependent: with high committed spending such as loan reimbursement or payment of children studies, they could be negatively affected in their daily budget. 2000 4000 6000 8000 0100200300400500600 Households' fuel spending according to their income Total income (€/household/month) Totalfuelspending(€/household/month) Income (€/month) Fuelspending(€/month) Fuel poor & income poor (ratio) = 2.0% of French households Fuel poor (ratio) = 10.5% of French households {2x median ratio = 3,9% Households’ share of income spent on fuel Combinations of factors (gather at least) Financial resources Fuel consumption Conditions of mobility Income poor Low income High spending Restriction Poor spatial matching No alternative Low vehicle performance or No vehicle x x Fuel poor Level of exposition x x x x x Fuel vulnerable x x x x x x x x x Fuel dependent Dimensions Factors Financial resources Income poor Low income Fuel consumption High spending Restriction Conditions of mobility Poor spatial matching No alternative Low vehicle performance or No vehicle Fuel poor Fuel vulnerable Fuel dependent We can transpose domestic fuel poverty indicators to the transport sector, but transposed indicators are not satisfactory. A composite indicator of vulnerability highlights the conditions of mobility and reveals households’ exposition to rising fuel prices. The LIHC* indicator is the official way of counting fuel poor in the UK for the domestic sector. It has the advantage to include households whose standard of living is lowered because of their fuel spending. Applied to the transport sector, we find 3.3% of French households are fuel poor, meaning each person spends more than 32€/month on buying fuel and live below the poverty line. Fuel poverty is also about transport: households that depend heavily on car use for their daily trips are likely to face difficulties if fuel prices keep on rising.1 2 3 Our work is illustrated with a French case study. Data from the National Transport Survey (Enquête Nationale Transports et Déplacements) Conducted by INSEE every 10-15 years, last available from 2008 Interviewed a sample of 20 200 French households Offers a detailed description of travel behaviors (compared to BDF) at the national level (compared to EMD) Focus on places to work and study. 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 0100200300400 Fuel poor identified with LIHC Income per CU (€ monthly) Fuelspendingperactiveindividual(€monthly) Residual income per unit of consumption (€/month) Fuelspendingperperson(€/month) Households’ fuel spending per person Fuel poor (LIHC) = 3.3% of French households Median spending = 32€/month Poverty line = 950€/month *Low Income High Cost * To compare the standards of living of households of different sizes, we adjust income by the consumption unit (CU) using the OECD equivalence scale: 1 CU for the first adult in the household, 0.5 CU for other adults, 0.3 CU for children. * ! "!!! #!!! $!!! %!!! &!!! !"!!#!!$!!%!! '()(*+,-./,01,23456789 :;-(*8(,(*,<./=+/.*>,-./,.<>7?,23456789 Fuel vulnerable = 11.7% of French households Fuel dependent = 3.7% of French households Income per unit of consumption (€/month) Fuelspendingperperson(€/month) 2x median spending = 64€/month Median income = 1580€/month Fuel poor = 1.8% of French households Poverty line = 950€/month Households’ fuel spending per person International Scientific Conference “Our Common Future Under Climate Change”, Paris, July 2015, P-4413-01 *