6. “A city within a city”
A Paradox
● The centre must combine the maximum of congestion
with the maximum of light and space
● All planning … should be based upon “a commercial
centre as beautiful as possible consistent with the
maximum income that should be developed”
7. Proposal for Metropolitan Square, 1928
(Benjamin Wistar Morris)
Proposal diagram, 1928 (Reinhard and Hofmeister)
10. Characteristics
● Smooth wall surface
● Smooth faced stone or metal
● Polychromy with vivid colours
● Simplified streamlined forms
● Set backs with stepped outline
● Geometric designs
● Vertical projections
● Metallic materials for decorative features
11. Highlighting the center’s vertical projection, 1978
(Carol Herselle Krinsky)
Setbacks and stepped outline,
2015 (Unknown)
14. In conclusion
In the end the Rockefeller Center solved it’s paradox and was able to take the idea
of the existing horizontal city and apply it into a vertical element to achieve having
a city within a city.
This made it the first building in the world to include retail stores, broadcasting
studios, restaurants and entertainment venues all in one place making it the first
ever Multi-use building.
15. Reference List
Koolhaas, R. 1994. Delirious New York. New York. Monacelli press
Art Deco. 2016. [O]. Available:
http://www.phmc.state.pa.us/portal/communities/culture/styles/art-deco.html
Accessed 8 May 2016
Rockerfeller Centre. 2016. [O]. Available
http://alokv.tripod.com/plan_port/rc519.html
Accessed 7 May 2016
Notes de l'éditeur
Explaining Modernism in its simple definition
Changes began with the rebuilding of the Grand central Station and the revamp of 5th ave and there was a trend of emerging skyscrapers. For 300 years, Lower Manhattan had dominated the city's economic life.
It began with trying to find new accommodation for the Metropolitan Opera by Benjamin Wistar Morris. The task was hard because of the manhattan paradox which was: The opera had to exist on its own in the least desirable parts of the grid and a better location would be expensive meaning the opera would have to have more commercial functions to make financial sense. It had become difficult to be conventional in Manhattan.
A paradox is a statement that is self contradictory but may be true. First of all, a city cannot physically exist within a city but his statement sounds true. Congestion is the opposite of light and space yet how can they exist simultaneously at their Maximum? And the same with Beauty and maximum income. Before, a building was either beautiful and served one function or its main point was to generate income.
The image on the left is Morris’s proposal for the new location of the opera house where the Opera would be situated on the west and the bulk of the centre is sacrificed in favour of his Beaux - Arts dignity of his Opera. On the right is Reinhard and Hofmeisters correction of Morris’s proposal where they suggest exploiting the full commercial potential by adding a major central tower. This was the beginning of the form of what the Rockefeller center is today.
Floor plan of Rockefeller center as it stands now
The design and finish elements of the center were greatly influenced by Beaux-Art or what we know as the Art-deco movement. It emphasises on the future rather than the past was the movement's main principle because it strives for modern and artistic expression.
Art deco Characteristics in architecture
The image on the left shows shows the linear projections that go skyward. And in the image on the right the stepped setbacks can be seen
These are the plans of the centers underground connecting concourse. The plan is very art deco because there is a geometry in the layout and in a sense some symmetry
On this facade many of the art deco characteristics can be identified.
Smooth wall surfaces and the stone limestone facade
The polychromy with vivid colours
Vertical projections
Metallic decorative features