1. F i n a l P r e s e n t a t i o n
B u s i n e s s Po l i c y F a l l 2 0 1 6
T h e C o l l a b o r a t i v e E f f o r t s o f :
Bashayer Baljon, Aly Homan, Paige Norris, Dominique Rampogu, and Taylor Wenger
2. 2
Agenda
• Company Overview
• Industry & Market Share
• Competition
• SWOT Analysis
• Strategic Initiatives
• I: Increasing Market Share
• II: Close Bottom 10% of Stores
• III: Halting & Renovating Stores
• End Results
4. Source: Fact Set
4
Sector:Consumer Non-Durables
Industry: Apparel and Footwear
Market Share of Industry Relative to Competitors
Kate Spade & Co Vera Bradley, Inc.
Michael Kors Coach
Vince Steven Madden
Industry & Market Share
31.41%42.06%
12.72% 10.05%
2.72%1.03%
5. 5
SWOT Analysis
STRENGTHS
• Diverse Channel Mix
• Liquidity
• Low COGS
OPPORTUNITIES
• Revisit Channel Strategy to
Strengthen E-Commerce
• New Product Line
WEAKNESSES
• Weak Brand Relevance
• Data Breach
THREATS
• Consumer’s Brand Association
withTraditional Prints
• Closing of Department Stores
6. 6
Objectives
Drive a 2% increase in sales in first year, a 3% increase in second year,
which claims a 5% increase in market share
StreamlineVera Bradley’s product development in order to achieve and
maintain brand relevance
Recapture lost same-store sales after sales per square foot decreased from
$760 to $703 in 2016, on top of 14.3% decrease from 2014 to 2015
1
2
3
7. 7
Strategy I: Increasing Market Share
V x VB
VERA BRADLEY SIGNATURE COLLECTION
Drive a 2% increase in sales in first year, a 3% increase in second year, which
claims a 5% increase in market share
Break out into two sub-brands underVera Bradley, Inc.
Extensive marketing campaign will support implementation
Recreate & strengthen brand perception and relevance among millennial women
10. 10
Strategy II: Close Bottom 10% of Stores
Close bottom 10% of underperforming stores
Result in funds used toward licensing costs for new sub-brand
Decrease
COGS
12. 12
Strategy III: Halting & Renovation of Stores
Recapture lost same-store sales after sales per square foot decreased from $760 to $703 in
2016, on top of 14.3% decrease from 2014 to 2015
Halt opening of new stores in fiscal 2017
Shift focus toward completing renovations of current full-line stores
COST SAVINGS:
$400,000 $62,500
New Store Costs (1200 sq. ft) Renovation Costs
16. Comparing Net Incomes with Each Strategy
Incremental
Value 2019
Net Income
2018
Net Income
2017
Net Income
2016
Net Income
Close Bottom
10%
22.97 16.29 -20.72 27.56
Increase Market
Share
37.25 30.49 13.59 27.56
Store
Renovations
18.73 11.68 1.18 27.56
Combined
Strategies
78.95 58.46 -5.95 16
18. Appendix
Incomes Statements
• NO STRATEGY
• COMBINED STRATEGIES
Competitive Analysis
• COGS COMPARISON
• GENERAL INFO
Channel Distribution
• DIRECTVS. INDIRECT
• CHANNEL COMPARISONYOY
Sales Analysis
• TOTAL SALES BY
PRODUCT CATEGORY
• SAME STORE SALES
Survey Results
• AGE OF RESPONDENTS
• DOYOU OWNVB PRODUCT?
• PRODUCT AWARENESS
• PRODUCT LIKEABILITY
• BRAND PERCEPTION
3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Profitability Ratios
• GROSS MARGIN
• OPERATING MARGIN
• NET PROFIT
• ROA
• ROE
• DuPont Analysis
OPERATION EFFICIENCY
• INVENTORYTURNOVER
• TOTAL ASSETTURNOVER
• ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE
LIQUIDITY
• CURRENT RATIO
• QUICK RATIO
19. 19
APPENDIX 1
35%
10%35%
15%
5%
% of Mix to IMC Budget
Digital Out-Of-Home Print Sales Promotion Direct Response
$33,392,000
$38,000,000
A n n u a l A d S p e n d :
To t a l M a r ke t i n g S p e n d :