This document provides an overview of the SMILE program, which aims to improve communication skills for young children through a bilingual family-centered early intervention approach. It discusses the importance of family involvement in intervention, highlighting research showing language enrichment and better outcomes when families are engaged. Theoretical models of parent participation and factors affecting involvement are examined. Strategies to connect therapy to families' daily routines are presented, including focusing intervention on routine activities, using consistent language-learning techniques, and collecting child language data. The goal is to empower families to support their child's communication development throughout daily activities not just during therapy sessions.
O898O367676 Call Girls In Ahmedabad Escort Service Available 24×7 In Ahmedabad
SMILE for Young Children: A Bilingual Program for Improving Communicaiton Skills
1. SMILE forYoung Children: A Bilingual
Program for Improving Communication Skills
Katherine Marting, M.A., CCC-SLP
Scott Prath, M.S., CCC-SLP
Beat the Heat Conference
July 24, 2012 Austin,TX Region 13 Education Service Center
2. Background
• Development:
▫ Bilingual SLPs
▫ Home-based ECI Services
▫ Need for family involvement
When families are involved in the intervention
process, language enrichment is ongoing rather than
during “therapy” only (Rosetti, 2001)
Without family involvement, intervention is unlikely
to be successful (Bronfenbrebrenner, 1974)
5. 1. Importance of Family
Involvement
Research
a. Language enrichment
b. Empowerment
c. Self-Efficacy
d. Why family participation is critical
6. a. Language Enrichment
• Parents use of language-based strategies leads to
▫ Increased receptive language skills in the first year
(Baumwell, Tamis-LeMonda & Bornstein, 1997)
▫ Increased receptive and expressive language skills in
the second and third years of life (Olson, Bates &
Bayles, 1986)
▫ Greater receptive vocabulary at 12 years of age
(Beckwith & Cohen, 1989)
7. a. Language Enrichment (cont’d)
• Mother’s use of labeling and increased periods of
interaction lead to increases in receptive
vocabulary and greater expansion of expression
in older children (Tomasello & Farrar, 1986)
• Participation by fathers in early childhood
programs has been shown to be beneficial to the
child, father and other family members (Frey,
Fewell, & Vadasy, 1989; Krauss, 1993)
8. b. Empowerment
• Empowering parents increases their likelihood
of accessing information pertaining to their
child’s development
9. c. Self-efficacy
• Empowerment leads to self efficacy or the belief
that they can make a difference in their child’s
development (Dempsey & Dunst, 2004)
10. d. Why family participation is critical
• Parents are the most consistent language models
in the child’s life
• When families are involved in the intervention
process, language enrichment is ongoing rather
than during “therapy” only (Rosetti, 2001)
• Without family involvement, intervention is
unlikely to be successful (Bronfenbrebrenner,
1974)
11. Family Involvement
• Why do we need family involvement?
▫ Social Learning Theories (Vygotsky, 1967)
▫ Family members are the guides and the child is
the apprentice who learns from adult models
(Rogoff, 1990)
▫ Parents are the most consistent language models
in their children’s lives and their first teachers
12. Family Involvement
• Parents use of language-based strategies leads
to:
▫ Increased receptive language skills in the first year
(Baumwell, Tamis-LeMonda & Bornstein, 1997)
▫ Increased receptive and expressive language skills in
the second and third years of life (Olson, Bates & Bayles,
1986)
▫ Greater receptive vocabulary at 12 years of age (Beckwith
& Cohen, 1989)
▫ 30 Million Word Gap by age 3 (Hart & Risley, 1995)
13. Family Involvement
• Mother’s use of labeling and increased periods of
interaction lead to increases in receptive
vocabulary and greater expansion of expression
in older children (Tomasello & Farrar, 1986)
• Participation by fathers in early childhood
programs has been shown to be beneficial to the
child, father and other family members (Frey,
Fewell, & Vadasy, 1989; Krauss, 1993)
14. Family Involvement
• Empowering parents increases their likelihood
of accessing information pertaining to their
child’s development
• Empowerment leads to self-efficacy or the belief
that they can make a difference in their child’s
development (Dempsey & Dunst, 2004)
18. Family’s Perspective
The therapist
just plays with
my child.
They just sit
and talk with
me and do
nothing with
my child.This is all too
overwhelming.
I forget what
to do after the
therapist
leaves.
I don’t have
time in my day
to do this.
19. SLP’s Perspective
Families don’t
always follow
through with
my suggestions.
I can’t get
families to
incorporate
ideas into daily
routines.
I don’t have
easily accessible
resources to
share with
families.
Many times
families don’t
keep
appointments.
20. 2. Understanding families
• Demographics
• Theoretical models of social systems
• Factors affecting family involvement
21. Demographics of Families
Enrolled in ECI in Texas
Research
a. Economics
b. Ethnicity
c. Language
d. Gender
e. Reason Eligible
f. Services on IFSP
22. a. Economics
• Percentage of ECI children receiving Medicaid
▫ 2006: 61%
▫ 2008: 60.3%
• Families at 250% of the poverty level or lower
▫ Approximately 84%
26. e. Reason Eligible
Reason Eligible Percent
Medical Diagnosis 11
Chromosomal Anomalies 35
Congenital Anomalies--Brain/Spinal Cord 16
Symptoms and Ill-Defined Conditions 14
Disorders of the Nervous System 12
Congenital Anomalies--Facial Clefts 9
Conditions Originating in Perinatal Period 7
Congenital Anomalies--Musculoskeletal 7
Developmental Delay 71
Atypical Development 18
Areas of Delay/Atypical Development
Speech/Communication 67
Physical/Motor 43
Cognitive 26
Adaptive/Self-Help 21
Social/Emotional 16
Vision 2
Hearing 2
Children with more than one qualifying diagnosis 22
Children with more than one area of delay 37
27. f. Services on IFSP
Percent of Children with Planned Service Types Percent
Service Coordination 100
Developmental Services 78
Speech Language Therapy 58
Occupational Therapy 32
Physical Therapy 25
Nutrition 12
Family Training/Counseling 5
Vision 3
Audiology 3
Psychological/Social Work 3
Medical/Nursing 1
28. Theoretical Models on Social
Systems
Research
a. Maslow’s Hierarchy of basic needs
b. Kubler-Ross’ 5 stages of grief
30. b. Kubler-Ross’ Five Stages of Grief
• Denial (this isn't happening to me!)
• Anger (why is this happening to me?)
• Bargaining (I promise I'll be a better person
if...)
• Depression (I don't care anymore)
• Acceptance (I’m ready for whatever comes)
32. Research Findings Pertaining to
Family Factors
• Mothers with limited family support tend to
withdraw from programs early (Luker & Chalmers, 1990)
• Mothers engaged in family conflict show
lower rates of involvement (Herzog, Cherniss, & Menzel,
1986)
• Mothers engaged in substance abuse showed
lower rates of involvement (Navaie-Waliser et al, 2000)
• Mothers who are anticipating a change in
residence also showed lower rates of
participation (National Committee to Prevent Child Abuse, 1996)
33. Factors Affecting Family Involvement
• Family Factors
▫ over which we have minimal influence but need to
understand
▫ over which we have more influence
• Minimal influence
▫ Social-emotional needs
▫ Economic needs
▫ Cultural parameters
• More influence
▫ Education about disability
▫ Attendance
▫ Engagement in the intervention process
34. Provider Factors Affecting
Parent Involvement
▫ Consistency and reliability
▫ Quantity (amount of
services)
▫ Recognizing your
assumptions
▫ Understanding family
needs
▫ Engaging all family
members
▫ Ability to adjust strategies
to match family style
▫ Communicating rationale
for intervention
techniques
▫ Clearly specifying what
families should do
between intervention
sessions
▫ Setting expectations
▫ Staff communication
▫ Staff education and
training
▫ Staff turnover rates
35. Research Findings Pertaining to Provider
Factors
• The more services a child/family receives, the more
progress the child makes
• High staff turnover rates reduce family involvement
▫ Gomby (2007)
• Quantity--There were some interesting studies that
showed that white families received more services
than others. Hispanics were rated as more engaged.
African Americans received less child-focused
activities.
▫ Wagner (2003)
36. Case Study #1: Understanding Kubler-
Ross’ stages of grief
How would you work with a family that is in denial?
Example
Interventionist: Lets work on the word “more”.
Parent: She says that.
Interventionist: Great, how about the words, mom or
dad?
Parent: She says that too.
Interventionist: She only says twenty words and she is
two years old
Parent: We understand what she wants
37. Case Study #2:
A client has been diagnosed with a receptive
and expressive language disorder. How
would you explain the rationale behind these
suggestions and strategies?
• Roll a ball back and forth with your child.
• Add a word to what your child says and
repeat the words back together.
• Give your spouse more time to form a
response.
39. How do we improve outcomes?
We know it’s important,
how do we do it?
• Provide specific instructions
• Provide a rationale
• Keep it simple and consistent
• Have it pertain to a family
event or routine
• Set expectations
• Have something written
• In their native language
• Follow through
• Make sure caregivers
understand:
▫ WHAT?
▫ HOW?
▫ WHY?
• Assess the caregivers
• Give positive reinforcement
• Take risks
41. Daily Routines
• 12 daily routines
• Frequency and consistency
• More natural
• Extra time is not needed to implement strategies
• Use objects in their environment as therapy
materials
42. Daily Routines
•Each routine includes:
• Speech/language focus
• Examples of each strategy
• Suggested target vocabulary and 6 pictures of signs
• Homework sheet
• Activity sheet
•The amount of time spent on each routine varies
45. • Improved communication and bonding (Goodwyn,
Acredolo, & Brown, 2000; Tompson et al., 2007)
• Children stop using sign when able to
communicate orally (Pizer, Walters & Meier, 2007)
• Provide visual support during language learning
Language Development
46. • Frequency and consistency
• The more a child hears a phrase the more likely
they are to use it
• Use phrases that the child is able to imitate
Language Development
47. • Imitation is vital for speech and language
development (Rogers & Williams, 2006)
• Teach the child how to imitate, by imitating their
sounds and movements
Language Development
48. • Each routine focuses on different vocabulary
• Multisensory learning for language targets
• Label objects, actions and descriptors
• Repeat object labels – the more a child hears a
word, the more likely they are to use it
Language Development
49. • Expand the child's utterances by adding
semantic information or syntactic complexity
can help their language grow.
• It is important to keep phrases simple enough
that your child can repeat them.
Language Development
51. • Visual, tactile and motor cues
• Examples:
▫ Clap out syllables in words
▫ Put hand in front of mouth to feel air on plosives
Speech Development
52. • Auditory cues
▫ Emphasize specific sounds in words
▫ Melodic cues
• Model appropriate speech production
▫ Break consonant clusters apart
▫ Model target words slowly with emphasis
Speech Development
53. • Imitate sounds in the environment
• Repeat an incorrect production correctly,
repeating the correct production several times
Speech Development
54. • Have a scavenger hunt
• Label objects that begin with the same sound to
increase phonological awareness
Speech Development
55. • Follow the hierarchy of speech production
• Help parents measure small successes
Speech Development
56. Example by Brianne Ruhnke on www.speakingofspeech.com
Speech Development
60. Data Collection
• What words or gestures does your child use?
▫ Greetings/Saludos:
Cuando saluda mueve la mano.
Translation: To give a greeting, he waves his hand.
▫ Getting Dressed/Vestirse:
Todavía no puede vestirse él solo. Le tengo que
ayudar.
He still doesn’t get dressed on his own. I have to help
him.
61. Data Collection
• What words or gestures does your child
understand?
▫ Greetings/Saludos:
Sí entiende pero no puede pronunciarlas.
Translation: He does understand, but he can’t
pronounce them.
▫ Getting Dressed/Vestirse:
No response
62. Data Collection
• What words or gestures does your child use?
▫ Toys and Playtime/Jugando:
Sí juega con niños de su edad.
Translation: He does play with children his age.
▫ Mealtime/Hora de Comer:
Se sienta a comer pero en ocasiones le tengo que dar
en la boca.
He sits to eat but sometimes I have to put the food in
his mouth.
63. Data Collection
• What words or gestures does your child
understand?
▫ Toys and Playtime/Jugando:
Para salir a jugar, dice “quiero jugar.”
Translation: When he wants to go out to play, he
says, “I want to play.”
▫ Mealtime/Hora de Comer:
“Quiero comer.”
Translation: “I want to eat.”
74. References
• Goodwyn, Acredolo, & Brown (2000). Impact of symbolic gesturing on early language
development. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 24, 81-103.
• Kummerer, B., Lopez-Reyna, N.A., & Hughes, M.T. (2007). Mexican Immigrant Mothers’
Perceptions of Their Children’s Communication Disabilities, Emergent Literacy Development,
and Speech-Language Therapy Program. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology,
16, 271-282.
• McWilliams, R. (2007). Early Intervention in Natural Environments. Retrieved February 5,
2008 from http://naturalenvironments.blogspot.com/2007/10/toy-bags.html
• Pizer, G., Walters, K., & Meier, R. P. (2007). Bringing up baby with baby signs: Language
ideologies and socialization in hearing families. Sign Language Studies, 7 (4), 387-430.
• Rogers, S. J., & Williams, J. H. G. (Eds.). (2006). Imitation and the Social Mind: Autism and
Typical Development. New York: The Guliford Press.
• Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in Thinking. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Thompson, R.H., Cotnoir-Bichelman, N.M., McKerchar, P.M., Tate, T.L., & Dancho, K.A.
(2007). Enhancing early communication through infant sign training. Journal of Applied
Behavior Analysis, 40, 15-23.
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1967). Play and its role in the mental development of the child. Soviet
Psychology, 5, 6-18.