2. 2
1st JIP:
DNV-OS-J103 Standard
(2011-2013)
New JIP:
coupled analysis
(2016-2017)
DNVGL-ST-0119 and
new RP
DNV GL & FLOATING INDUSTRY – THE JOINT JOURNEY
THIRD PARTY SERVICES AND JOINT PROJECTS
2
Hywind demo 2.3MW (2008)
Pelastar FEED (2013)
VolturnUS – concept (2014)
ACS - Concept (2014-2015)
Aerodyn SCD Nezzy – Concept (2014)
WindFloat Atlantic (2015- on-going)
Hywind Scotland 24MW(2015-2017)
European floating wind farm (2017 – on-going) Nuatilus – concept (on-going)
3. WHAT IS CERTIFICATION?
3
Do they match???
Sky
2000
Arklow
Bank
Utgru
nden
Horn
s Rev
Bl
yt
h
B
e
at
ri
c
e
Docking
Shoal
Race
Bank
Tunø
Knob
N
y
st
e
d
Vi
n
d
e
b
y
S
a
m
s
ø
B
el
ts
e
e
B
re
itli
n
g
Nyst
ed II
Smygg
eham
Arkona-
Becken
Südost
Kriegers
Flak II
Klutzer
Winkel
Omø
Stalgrunde
Ytte
Stengrund
Lille
grun
d
North
Misjobanken
Uttgrun
den II
Bl
e
ki
n
g
e
Ska
brev
et
Middelgr
unden Bars
eban
k
Friedrichs
haven
L
a
e
s
ø
E
m
d
e
n
Wilhelms
haven
FI
N
O
Alpha
Ventus
RWE Innogy
IBorkum
Riffgrund
B
ar
d
N
L
Bute
ndiek
Norder
gründe
Amrumbank
West
Ri
ff
g
at
Dan
Tysk
Prince
ss
Amalia
(Q7)
Gode
Wind
B
al
tic
1BARD
Offshore IBorkum Riffgrund
West
Baltic 2
Nördlicher
Grund
Sandbank
24
Nordse
e Ost
Amrum
bankMee
rwin
d
GE
OG
FRe
E
`He
Dreiht‘
`N
ord
se
e‘
Global
Tech I
Robin
Rigg
Cromer
Metmast
Scroby
Sands
Deutsche
Bucht
London
Horns
Rev II
Delta
NordseeBorkum
West II
Veja
Mate
North
Hoyle
Gwynt
y Mor
Lessons learned from more than
50 offshore wind projects
4. 4
WHY CERTIFICATION? (SEEN FROM OUR CUSTOMERS)
4
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
Adding quality to the
design
Requirements from
insurance companies
Requirements from
authorities
Attracting investors
Why Certification?
Source: DNVGL Floating wind customer survey, 2015
QUALITY
TRUST
SAFETY
6. 6
RISK REDUCTION – CONCEPT PHASE
Concept
MAIN PROJECT RISK
Possible novelties to be identified
Unpredicted technical challenges
Challenging design for next phases, e.g. adaptability to site
conditions or execution phases
MAIN CERTIFICATION OBJECTIVES
Identifying possible show stoppers
Issuing recommendations on next development phase
Adding confidence towards possible investors and partners
Source: Aerodyn
Source: Henrik Stiesdal
7. 7
RISK REDUCTION – DESIGN PHASES
MAIN PROJECT RISK
Challenging locations to determine site conditions
Young industry - few experienced partners
Multiple partners in the projects
Consistency in design process
(time schedule, standards, components, project phases,…)
MAIN CERTIFICATION OBJECTIVES
From design basis to detailed design
Interphases, and trust among stakeholders
Quality of design
Design
WindFloat
Photo: Principle Power
Hywind
Photo: Knut Ronold DNVGL
PelaStar
Source: Glosten
8. 8
RISK REDUCTION – EXECUTION PHASES
MAIN PROJECT RISK
Challenging weather conditions
Procedure and tools adapted from other industries
Procedures not adapted to the design or site conditions
MAIN CERTIFICATION OBJECTIVES
From manufacturing to commissioning
Specifications and design codes are complied with
All operations planned w.r.t. weather and contingencies
Safety
Execution