SlideShare une entreprise Scribd logo
1  sur  95
Télécharger pour lire hors ligne
SOMATIC TRANSPORTATION ASSESSMENT
RECORD (STAR) REPORT
CITY OF ONAWA
STAR Report
Page 1 of 94
STAR Report
Page 2 of 94
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTIONS
Background 3
STAR Report Defined 3
Residential Comments 4
Funding Opportunities 5
STAR Summary Findings 5
Opportunities 6
Repeal Chapter 136 6
Compliance with Chapter 136 6
Somatic Transportation Utility 7
Spreadsheets Data Base 8
Culmination 11
TABLES
STAR Summary 5
Somatic Transportation Utility Opportunity 7
APPENDICES
Appendix A: Onawa Municipal Code Chapter 136 11
Appendix B: Iowa State Code Sidewalk Plan 17
Appendix C: STAR Spreadsheets 24
STAR Report
Page 3 of 94
Background
On January 27, 2015 the City of Onawa (City), Monona County, Iowa City Council applied to participate in the
Community Visioning Program sponsored through Trees Forever, the Iowa Department of Transportation (IDOT), and
Iowa State University (ISU). This program conducts local research to better understand what the community is in
need of or wants in regards to bicycle and pedestrian transportation. The program prepares a document that
demonstrates the possibilities with improved pedestrian and bicycle transportation for a community. This involved
community members through a Community Visioning Steering Committee (Committee), surveys and focus groups.
Further research gathered included, but was not limited to, water sheds, drainage, and local destination locations.
During the Committee meetings, committee members learned almost immediately that this was not a program just
about trails, but a comprehensive picture of the City’s bicycle and pedestrian transportation barriers and assets.
The City has a current sidewalk ordinance, Chapter 136 (see appendix A), which covers areas such as specifications or standards, owner
responsibility, debris (including grass clippings), permit requirements, and responsibility for maintenance. Chapter 136 further includes details of
Council’s ability to force the construction or repair work of any sidewalk. In the late 1970s to the early 1980s the City undertook a sidewalk development
or improvement project using a Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) the City received. There was still an associated cost to the City and its
residents that benefitted from the improvements, even though it met with residential resistance due to their individual costs. According to current Iowa
Code (see Appendix B) the City can adopt a sidewalk program that addresses issues such as maintenance, repair, replacement and installation, which
could provide a sound long-term plan for the community. These plans should address the requirements for maintaining sidewalks, how and when the
city will inspect sidewalks, and how the program will be funded. Such programs can be funded by the city, by property owners directly or through special
assessments on the property owner’s taxes that can be repaid over a ten year payback.
STAR Report Defined
Due to the above facts gathered regarding current Iowa Code, current city ordinance, a participant in the
Committee, a City public employee, and a devoted “walker”, and to find a real comprehensive approach to understanding
the City’s pedestrian and bicycle transportation needs and wants; the City Administrator completed this Somatic
Transportation Assessment Record (STAR) Report. The City Administrator was and is not an engineer or somatic
transportation expert. This assessment began at the end of June and ran through the early days of August in 2015. The
purpose behind the STAR was to ensure the City understands the current conditions of pedestrian, bicycle, or wheelchair transportation. Therefore this
report will begin with the definition behind STAR from the Merriam-Webster online dictionary (http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/):
• Somatic: (1) of, relating to, or affecting the body.
• Transportation: the act or process of moving people or things from one place to another or a way of traveling from one place to another place.
• Assessment: the act of making a judgment about something or an idea or opinion about something.
• Record: is to write something down so that it can be used or seen again in the future.
STAR Report
Page 4 of 94
Hence, with the above definitions kept in mind, this report refines those to reflect the use within STAR as:
• Somatic: by use of a physical motion from or affecting the body: either walking, running, or by use of a mechanical device under manual
operation such as: a bicycle, stroller, walker, or wheelchair (both manual and battery operated).
• Transportation: the act or process of moving individuals from one place to another by use of somatic transportation: sidewalk, trail, and/or
path.
• Assessment: the act of making a judgment about the condition of public somatic transportation, sidewalk, trail, and/or path.
• Record: documenting the current somatic transportation, sidewalk, trail, and/or path condition for future reference, correction, and use.
The above definition can be further refined to simply state the STAR Report is an assessment of somatic transportation documenting the current
condition of City sidewalks, paths, and/or trails for future reference, correction, and use. Therefore, the purpose of the STAR report is to create a record
of the current condition of all of the somatic transportation within the City limits that are available for public use. Within this report sidewalks, trails,
and/or paths will be used interchangeably with somatic transportation and one term will reflect the others. STAR did not assess access somatic
transportation to businesses, public entities, or residential properties that were attached to or adjacent to the primary somatic transportation of the
property, such as the sidewalk from the curb to the public somatic transportation, from the somatic transportation to the residential front door, a
business’s access sidewalk from the public sidewalk. The public portion of the sidewalk for purposes of the STAR are those portions of sidewalks
intended to be used as an intermediary sidewalk for an individual to use as transportation through or to the respective property. These assessments
then will become a record that is useable to the City to retain the conditions of the sidewalks and/or trails by useable spreadsheets where the data can
be modified when a portion of a property’s sidewalk is improved, added to, or reconstructed in part or wholly.
Residential Comments
During the assessment of STAR we had the opportunity to discuss the conditions of the somatic transportation
from the Community Visioning program as well as during the actual assessments. Residents understand the need for a
good condition sidewalk upon their property as well as throughout the community. Many stated in retrospect that they
understood their sidewalk was in ill repair and needed some attention. This would be followed up with the comment that
they do not have the money to install or maintain their sidewalk. Further comments included the question of why
sidewalks were needed upon their property since their neighbors across the street had a sidewalk or that people walk in
the street.
Although these comments are valid, walkers from the community mentioned barriers to somatic transportation
and some of those comments included the condition of current sidewalks, animals “protecting their property” and sidewalks ending at property lines in
the middle of the street forcing them to walk across the verge (the area between the curb and property line). The photo to the left shows a pedestrians
walking on a grass filled sidewalk. Other barrier comments included vehicles parked across the sidewalk, grass clippings upon the sidewalk, and low
hanging trees. The sidewalk condition comments demonstrates the need for an improved somatic transportation system within the City and a severe
need for financial assistance.
STAR Report
Page 5 of 94
Funding Opportunities
A number of funding
opportunities are available for the City
to consider a sidewalk improvement
plan to address their current
condition. These funding
opportunities will be discussed in
depth within the Community Visioning final report. Some of these
grant opportunities include Community Development Block Grants
(CDBG), Safe Routes to Schools, and other grants through the
United States Department of Agriculture, the Iowa Economic
Development Agency (IEDA) and the Iowa Department of Natural
Resources (IDNR).
STAR Summary Findings
A review of the Iowa Code, the
Community Visioning draft version
and their collected data, and the STAR
data collected derives the conclusion
that the somatic transportation within
the City needs improvement. This
STAR Report can be used as a step in producing a somatic
transportation plan in accordance to the Iowa Code along with the
Community Visioning final product. The current City statistics cover
property encompasses over five (5) square miles or just under 3,340
acres of agricultural land (approximately 1,770 acres), developable
land, and pre-existing developed land; including both residential
and commercial properties. The STAR Summary chart to the right
represents the findings of the assessment portion of this STAR
Report.
Labeled within the STAR Summary Table’s first column is
“Street”. Each North to South bound street is represented with the
East to West streets used as connecting routes. The connecting
routes from alley to the adjoining street statistics are kept with the
north to south street information. From the STAR Summary Chart
you can determine that within the City there are approximately
STAR SUMMARY
Street Prop. Com.
No
Trans Ramps Low High Avg
1st 33 4 18 9 0.00 5.50 2.52
2nd 75 6 29 65 0.00 5.10 2.30
3rd 91 2 0 61 0.00 5.00 2.03
4th 93 3 17 57 0.00 6.60 2.40
5th 106 0 24 73 0.00 5.80 2.59
6th 100 1 6 51 0.00 6.60 2.65
7th 73 9 14 39 0.00 5.40 2.55
8th 73 21 24 42 0.00 5.00 2.60
9th 122 43 30 53 0.00 5.50 2.50
10th 137 65 29 46 0.00 5.80 2.44
11th 100 8 9 43 0.00 7.70 2.75
12th 129 1 29 44 0.00 5.60 2.61
13th 118 5 24 46 0.00 5.40 2.77
14th 108 0 49 48 0.40 5.30 2.92
15th 116 7 69 82 0.00 5.40 2.69
16th/Sun 34 0 27 14 2.40 4.80 3.08
17th 26 1 24 12 2.40 3.00 2.95
18th 4 3 4 4 3.00 3.00 3.00
Elmwood 9 0 9 4 3.00 3.00 3.00
Kingsway 8 0 8 4 3.00 3.00 3.00
Granite 20 0 20 2 3.00 3.00 3.00
Lucas 20 0 14 14 2.40 3.30 2.99
Lucas Pl. 9 0 9 0 3.00 3.00 3.00
Pearl 12 4 12 14 3.00 3.00 3.00
N. Iowa 11 11 11 12 3.00 3.00 3.00
S. Iowa 13 11 13 8 3.00 3.00 3.00
E. Iowa 13 10 13 6 3.00 3.00 3.00
STAR Report
Page 6 of 94
1,650 mixed use properties (“Prop.” column), varying in size and dimensions, of which over 200 properties are commercially (“Com.” Column) related
and/or zoned; not including agricultural parcels. Under the “No Trans” column represents that 541 properties in the City do not have any somatic form
of transportation; which is nearly one-third of all city properties. The “Ramps” column represent how many American with Disabilities Act ramps are
needed within the City. This act was adopted by the United States Federal Government on July 26, 1990; a total of 853 ramps are needed.
The next three columns are representative of the low, high and average along a north to south streets. Ratings on the spreadsheets are further
explained in the Spreadsheets Data Base of this report. For brevity, the low and high are indicated by their appropriate columns, and the average is the
rating of all somatic transportation along each respective street. These ratings range from 0, 1, 2, or 3. In the “High” column you will notice that the
high exceeds a 3.00 in most cases. Again, this is further explained in the Spreadsheets Data Base, but it can be stated that this is due to the concept that
a poorly maintained sidewalk is worse than no somatic transportation at all, and this is part of the assessment process used within this STAR Report. In
review the STAR Summary Chart indicates that the City of Onawa and its somatic transportation infrastructure needs to be improved. These findings
also suggest possible opportunities for the City to explore.
Opportunities
Grants are a viable, but limited, resource available to small rural communities
including the City of Onawa. Though grants are becoming more competitive each year with
limited resources from the funding agencies. However, with the limited extent of grants, it
would be in the City’s best interest to pursue these grants to aid in the construction and
rehabilitation of existing somatic transportation. This kept in mind there are a couple of
options to repair the somatic transportation system within the City and they include: repeal
the code, require compliance, or create a utility to assume all responsibility for the
maintenance of the City’s somatic transportation infrastructure.
REPEAL CHAPTER 136
Although it may be the easiest decision to remove the requirement of sidewalks with the repeal of the Onawa Municipal Code Chapter 136
entitled “Sidewalks”, it can also have long term drastic effects against the community’s ability to grow, thrive, and prosper. This could include, but is not
limited to, businesses not locating in the City, businesses leaving the community, a future potential resident choosing not to relocate within the City of
Onawa due to the lack of recreational (somatic transportation) opportunities, etc. By removing the sidewalk requirement, no business or resident would
have the financial impact of having to install or maintain the somatic form of transportation. This means that businesses would no longer have to a
sidewalk leading to their front door, pedestrians would have to walk through grass, weeds, gravel, or dirt to get to the store they need or want to shop
at. Though this opportunity is the least amount of a financial impact to the City and its residents, it is only first to be discussed and carries the most
potential harmful impacts to the City and its future. Although, the City Council should consult with the City Attorney to ensure this is a viable option.
COMPLIANCE WITH CHAPTER 136
This opportunity would actually cost the City the most with limited financial resources and multiple hours of staff time to enforce, due to the
current condition of the City’s somatic transportation. The financial resources would be used by the City Attorney’s office to cite those property owners
not in compliance, time spent on the phone with those cited and possible court time and expenses. This expense would be shared with other City staff
STAR Report
Page 7 of 94
members due to their time investment with paperwork, phone conversations with
property owners in an attempt to get their property in compliance, and court
appearances. This is also the most detrimental to owners of property that are at
an intersection, as they do not have to install or maintain a sidewalk for 66 feet.
Corner property owners have to install and maintain a sidewalk for at least 198
feet (66 feet of the main street frontage, plus 124 feet side street frontage and
half of the alley way), plus two ramp installation for the curb transition of the
sidewalk to the street. These increased expenses for a corner lot make this an
unfair disadvantage for nearly one-third (1/3) of the City’s residents. This
opportunity to fix the somatic transportation to come into compliance with the
current code would be the most time consuming and expensive to the residents
and City funds.
SOMATIC TRANSPORTATION UTILITY
The best opportunity for the City is to consider a Somatic Transportation
Utility (STU), based on the assessment portion of this report with the current
sidewalk conditions. This is further based upon the City’s resident’s random
comments regarding the cost of maintaining and/or repairing their individual
sidewalks: “it is unaffordable”. The table to the right depicts possible revenue
generation to reconstruct or to maintain current somatic transportation within the
City limits. The “Utility” column depicts the possible amount the certain street
would fund towards a formation of a STU to care for the City’s somatic
transportation. This is an annual amount, with the total at the bottom of the
column and is based on each property paying a monthly base utility fee of $3.00
(although this is an arbitrary number). Under the “Cons. Fees” are an additional
amount for property owners that currently do not have a form of somatic
transportation, or sidewalk, as required by the current code. This amount is four
(4) times the cost of the STU’s base fee; whatever that fee Council would establish,
but the total in the table to the right is again based on $3.00 per monthly fee;
$12.00 in total for a currently non-compliant sidewalk. It will not cover the entire
cost of the construction or reconstruction of somatic transportation, but is paid
over a ten (10) year period and can be used to match any and all grants obtained
for somatic transportation. Once the ten (10) years have expired their rate would
decrease to the established base utility fee at that time. Pooling these resources is
an opportunity to repair and improve the City’s current somatic transportation
Somatic Transportation Utility Opportunity
Street Utility Cons. Fees Cons. Costs
1st $ 1,332.00 $ 2,160.00 $ 40,000.00
2nd $ 2,916.00 $ 864.00 $ 54,400.00
3rd $ 3,348.00 $ 1,836.00 $ 70,600.00
4th $ 3,456.00 $ 4,428.00 $ 111,100.00
5th $ 3,816.00 $ 5,400.00 $ 136,600.00
6th $ 3,636.00 $ 4,752.00 $ 116,800.00
7th $ 2,952.00 $ 4,428.00 $ 101,200.00
8th $ 3,384.00 $ 4,644.00 $ 104,000.00
9th $ 5,940.00 $ 6,912.00 $ 150,800.00
10th $ 7,272.00 $ 7,128.00 $ 150,900.00
11th $ 3,888.00 $ 5,076.00 $ 117,100.00
12th $ 4,680.00 $ 7,128.00 $ 149,700.00
13th $ 4,428.00 $ 7,128.00 $ 152,400.00
14th $ 3,888.00 $ 8,856.00 $ 178,100.00
15th $ 4,428.00 $ 9,072.00 $ 196,800.00
16th/Sun $ 1,224.00 $ 3,240.00 $ 60,600.00
17th $ 972.00 $ 2,592.00 $ 48,000.00
18th $ 252.00 $ 432.00 $ 9,200.00
Elmwood $ 324.00 $ 972.00 $ 17,700.00
Kingsway $ 288.00 $ 864.00 $ 16,000.00
Granite $ 720.00 $ 2,160.00 $ 35,200.00
Lucas $ 720.00 $ 1,944.00 $ 40,200.00
Lucas Pl. $ 324.00 $ 864.00 $ 13,600.00
Pearl $ 576.00 $ 1,296.00 $ 28,800.00
N. Iowa $ 792.00 $ 1,188.00 $ 25,900.00
S. Iowa $ 864.00 $ 1,404.00 $ 26,900.00
E. Iowa $ 828.00 $ 1,404.00 $ 25,700.00
$ 67,248.00 $98,172.00 $2,178,300.00
STAR Report
Page 8 of 94
that is fair to all residents and a benefit to all; property owners, tenants, and visitors.
The final column, “Cons. Costs” is the estimated total investment for current properties within the City to meet the City’s current code for the
sidewalk requirement. Any property with a “Total” score of 2.8 or more, or with any category in the assessment rated at a “3” should be required to
bring their assessment to a reasonable score of a “0” or “1”, or the property owner should agree to the ten (10) year “Cons. Fee”. The construction fee
recommendation is due to the fairness and equity, unless Council believes that it is acceptable for those residents who have not maintained their
sidewalks should pay the same rate as those residents who have maintained their property’s sidewalk. Once all required properties have a form of
somatic transportation, new construction or repaired, the STU fund total could be used to maintain the sidewalk and create a bicycle/trail system
throughout the City after the ten (10) year pay back. New construction on private property should still be required to install somatic transportation
during the development stages of any vertical structural improvement on the property. After the installation of the sidewalk according to the current
code, the STU would then retain all maintenance, repair, and reconstruction of the newly installed somatic transportation. This maintenance can and
should be contracted out to local contractors as much as possible. At no time should the utility funds be used to construct a new somatic transportation
upon a property that is or has been developed; that should be the property owner’s responsibility. A recommended exception to this rule may be that
of any public benefit of trails, paths, or any form of somatic transportation to a destination site: such as Gramm Wetlands, Blue Lake, or other possible
destinations yet to be determined.
If the decision of the Council is to create a STU, it is the recommendation that a further study be conducted to establish a fair rate to cover the
known and possibly discover some unforeseen issues and costs. The STAR report was not created to form a utility, but instead to assess the existing
somatic transportation’s condition, offer a record to maintain the data on the existing infrastructure, and present some opportunities. Again, the
estimated costs were derived from the assessment completed through the end of June through the beginning of August 2015 and individually can be
reviewed through the generated record or spreadsheets in Appendix C.
Spreadsheets Data Base
As mentioned previously, the assessment of the somatic transportation capability within the City is documented using
spreadsheets (see Appendix C) that shall be retained by the City for future reference and updating when a sidewalk is
improved. The condition of existing PCC concrete sidewalks are assessed based upon five types of deterioration. Each
sidewalk is given a rating based on the severity of deficiency. These ratings are based on property frontage of each individually
owned lot in the City, whether the lot has 66 feet of frontage or more along a street or streets: such as a corner lot. Streets
were assessed along the major portion of a street, that major portion in the City of Onawa are north and south directional
streets that are numbered for the most part. The east to west directional streets are included with the north and south
directional street assessments from the alley to the intersection. Streets that have a limited number of properties, residential or commercial, may be
combined with other street assessments within the spreadsheet data base.
Defining the data base is essential to ensure the understanding and future use of the assessed information and the information provided on
each individual spreadsheet is appropriately utilized for years to come. Further the explanation includes how points were assessed under each category
to reach the total impact on somatic transportation. Some assessed categories carry a different weight than others due to the impact severity to
somatic transportation. When applicable, a photo will precede the definition for each column within the Somatic Transportation Spreadsheets
description supplied here below.
STAR Report
Page 9 of 94
Address: Each assessed property has an address whether there is a building on it or not. If there is no known address, one is assigned the vacant lot for
purposes of this report and should be amended as an appropriate address is assigned to the lot due to the construction of a new building
upon the lot. Addresses were obtained from the Monona County, Iowa Assessor’s Geographical Information System (GIS) website
(https://mononaia.mygisonline.com/). An address followed by a small star (*) indicates a corner lot that has some form of somatic
transportation along one street but not the other street.
Corner: Corner or intersecting street name; if there is a star (*) after the intersecting street name the property is along the side or adjoining street
between the main street and the alley or approximately where an alley should be located.
C: Commercial property: if a number “1” appears in this column it signifies that the property assessed is a commercial property. This is done for
informational purposes at the time of the STAR report, but can be used for future reference if the City decides to establish a Somatic
Transportation Utility and if the City would implement a higher fee for commercial properties.
Trans: If there is no sidewalk or somatic transportation this will show an "N"; as depicted in the photo to the left
Ramp II: If a corner of the intersecting street has a ramp that runs perpendicular, or down to the intersection
named street, this column will have a “Y” or it will have an “N” if it does not have a ramp. An “N/A” is an indication of a
continuing street. A continuing street means that one side of the street an intersecting street where the other side
continues without a street; otherwise known as a “T” intersection.
Ramp =: If a corner of the intersecting street has a ramp that runs parallel or along the named street on the
spreadsheet, this column will have a “Y” or it will have an “N” if it does not have a ramp. An “N/A” is an indication of a continuing street. A continuing
street means that one side of the street an intersecting street where the other side continues without a street; otherwise known as a “T” intersection.
CB: Corner Break: [1] one or more corner cracks in a sidewalk with minimum impact to somatic transportation; [2]
one (1) or more severe cracks that could impact somatic transportation significantly or more than six (6) cracks of
category [1]; [3] one (1) or more severe cracks located in a property’s sidewalk that prevents somatic transportation or
more than three [2] rating or more than twelve (12) cracks of no to slight impact to somatic transportation. This
category is weighted at 1.0 times per assessed point.
STAR Report
Page 10 of 94
LC:Line Cracking (Long. & Trans.): [1] one or more linear cracks in a sidewalk with minimum impact to somatic transportation; [2]
one (1) or more severe cracks that could impact somatic transportation significantly or more than six (6) cracks of category [1]; [3]
one (1) or more severe cracks located in a panel that prevents somatic transportation or more than three [2] rating or more than
twelve (12) cracks of no to slight impact to somatic transportation. This category is weighted at 1.0 times per assessed point.
JS: Joint Spalling: [1] one or more cracks along the edges of a sidewalk with minimum impact to somatic
transportation; [2] one (1) or more severe cracks that could impact somatic transportation significantly or more than six
(6) cracks of category [1]; [3] one (1) or more severe cracks located in a panel that prevents somatic transportation or
more than three [2] rating or more than twelve (12) cracks of no to slight impact to somatic transportation. This
category is weighted at 1.25 times per assessed point.
MC: Map Cracking: [1] one or more map cracks in a sidewalk with minimum impact to somatic transportation
or minor surface damage to the concrete; [2] one (1) or more severe cracks that could impact somatic
transportation significantly or more than six (6) map cracking of category [1], or significant surface damage; [3]
one (1) or more severe cracks located in a panel that prevents somatic transportation or more than three [2]
rating, or more than twelve (12) cracks of no to slight impact to somatic transportation, or multiple surface
damage preventing or severely inhibiting somatic transportation. This category is weighted at 1.5 times per
assessed point.
JF: Joint Faulting: [1] one or more lifting action of a panel (one panel is higher or lower than an adjoining
panel) with minimum impact to somatic transportation, or weeds have grown in between two panels, or
panels are greater than ADA maximum distance between panels of 0.25 of an inch; [2] one (1) or more
severe cracks that could impact somatic transportation significantly or more than six (6) joint faults of
category [1]; [3] one (1) or more severe joint faults that prevent somatic transportation or more than
three [2] rating or more than twelve (12) cracks of no to slight impact to somatic transportation. This category is weighted at 2.0 times per
assessed point.
TOTAL: Total weighted assessed point value for a property’s somatic transportation including the categories of Corner Break (CB), Line Cracking (LC),
Joint Spalling (JS), Map Cracking (MC), and Joint Fault (JF).
Rating: Severity of sidewalk distress: A rating of [0-1.5] indicates that the sidewalk is absent of distress and does not need to be replaced: [1] = low
severity and should last at least ten (10) or more years, [1.5-2.8] equals moderate severity and should be planned to be replaced in the
STAR Report
Page 11 of 94
next five (5) to ten (10) years, and [2.8 or greater] means there is either no existing form of somatic transportation or a high severity of
distress and should be replaced as soon as possible. This rating is based on the "TOTAL" assessed values divided by the five (5) added
categories with a ranking from 0.00 or higher. This demonstrates that a higher number than three (3) and the existing concrete is more
detrimental to somatic transportation than if there was no sidewalk at all.
Notes: Notes are used either to aid in the assessment to ensure the property was connected to the correct address within the spreadsheet. This area
could also be used to document other items of interest or for future use.
For the purpose of this written report the following columns are not included in the body of the report, but are available with the City provided
spreadsheets, as these were used for a possible solution of an STU and are based on a potential fee and therefore the figures are not fixed:
Install: This is the estimated cost to install a new sidewalk upon a property for a 66’ frontage along the named street. This is for a four feet by four
feet panel at four inches thick and includes the removal of an existing sidewalk.
Deduct: The deduction column deducts $350.00 from the $2,000.00 for properties that do not currently have a sidewalk in disrepair under the “Install”
column, it is the deduction that represents the increase in cost if a sidewalk needs to be removed prior to installation of a new sidewalk.
Total: This is the total of the Install column minus the Deduct column totals.
Fee: This column includes the extra fee for a property that needs to replace, repair or the new construction of a sidewalk. This is the cost the
property owner would reimburse the City to replace the sidewalk over a period of ten (10) years that would be included in a monthly
payment plan, that is if the City decides to pursue the improvement of the property owners responsibility of sidewalk maintenance by the
creation of a STU.
Culmination
The Community Visioning program enhanced and addressed assets and barriers to the somatic transportation within the City of Onawa. This
STAR Report was completed based on the concerns of sidewalk conditions expressed by residents of the City throughout the Community Visioning study.
This was a comprehensive study assessing all pedestrian and bicycle transportation and storm water that could impede all somatic transportation.
Therefore, to really be an entirely comprehensive study, this STAR Report was completed to aid in the Community Visioning study and to help the City
Council form a positive direction on what to do for its citizens and its future. The City Council has three options to consider: repeal the sidewalk
ordinance, enforce the current sidewalk ordinance, or form a somatic transportation utility. If the second option is adopted, then the City Council should
consider the completion of a sidewalk plan according to the Iowa Code, which could be the most expensive solution to the City and its residents. If the
City adopts the third option, then a further study should be completed prior to the implementation of the utility to ensure the correct base fee amount
is established and how to collect the Somatic Transportation Utility fee on the properties within the City’s limits. The last opportunity is the middle
ground in expense, development, and improvement and will be more expensive to some residents, but it is possibly the most fair to the entire City’s
resident’s base.
STAR Report
Page 12 of 94
If the second or third option is selected to pursue for the City’s future, this STAR Report will enhance either program as the spreadsheets will aid
City staff in the maintenance and installation of sidewalk or replacements if needed. Therefore, the last two options should consider the adoption of the
STAR Report to enhance and target the beginning and continuance of somatic transportation within the City by use of the STAR Report’s spreadsheet
information. Both the second and third opportunity are aided by the adoption and implementation of the spreadsheet use to target where to begin with
somatic transportation improvement. Either opportunity should also include a plan as outlined from the Iowa League of Cities and the Iowa Code. The
STAR Report enhances the plan and is a good starting point for the development and direction of a plan.
STAR Report
Page 13 of 94
STAR Report
Page 14 of 94
Appendix A: Onawa Municipal Code Chapter 136
STAR Report
Page 15 of 94
CHAPTER 136
SIDEWALK REGULATIONS
136.01 Purpose 136.11 Interference with Sidewalk
Improvements
136.02 Definitions 136.12 Awnings
136.03 Removal of Snow, Ice, and
Accumulations
136.13 Encroaching Steps
136.04 Responsibility for Maintenance 136.14 Openings and Enclosures
136.05 City May Order Repairs 136.15 Fires or Fuel on Sidewalks
136.06 Sidewalk Construction Ordered 136.16 Defacing
136.07 Permit Required 136.17 Debris on Sidewalks
136.08 Sidewalk Standards 136.18 Merchandise Display
136.09 Barricades and Warning Lights 136.19 Sales Stands
136.10 Failure to Repair or Barricade 136.20 Water Spouts
136.01 PURPOSE. The purpose of this chapter is to enhance safe passage by citizens on sidewalks, to place the responsibility for the maintenance,
repair, replacement, or reconstruction of sidewalks upon the abutting property owner and to minimize the liability of the City.
136.02 DEFINITIONS. For use in this chapter the following terms are defined:
1. “Broom finish” means a sidewalk finish that is made by sweeping the sidewalk when it is hardening.
2. “Defective sidewalk” means any public sidewalk exhibiting one or more of the following characteristics:
A. Vertical separations equal to three-fourths (¾) inch or more.
B. Horizontal separations equal to one (1) inch or more.
C. Holes or depressions equal to three-fourths (¾) inch or more and at least four (4) inches in diameter.
D. Spalling over fifty percent (50%) of a single square of the sidewalk with one or more depressions equal to one-half (½) inch or
more.
E. Spalling over less than fifty percent (50%) of a single square of the sidewalk with one or more depressions equal to three-fourths
(¾) inch or more.
F. A single square of sidewalk cracked in such a manner that no part thereof has a piece greater than one square foot.
G. A sidewalk with any part thereof missing to the full depth.
STAR Report
Page 16 of 94
H. A change from the design or construction grade equal to or greater than three-fourths (¾) inch per foot.
3. “Established grade” means that grade established by the City for the particular area in which a sidewalk is to be constructed.
4. “One-course construction” means that the full thickness of the concrete is placed at one time, using the same mixture throughout.
5. “Owner” means the person owning the fee title to property abutting any sidewalk and includes any contract purchaser for purposes of
notification required herein. For all other purposes, “owner” includes the lessee, if any.
6. “Portland cement” means any type of cement except bituminous cement.
7. “Sidewalk” means all permanent public walks in business, residential or suburban areas.
8. “Sidewalk improvements” means the construction, reconstruction, repair, replacement, or removal, of a public sidewalk and/or the
excavating, filling or depositing of material in the public right-of-way in connection therewith.
9. “Wood float finish” means a sidewalk finish that is made by smoothing the surface of the sidewalk with a wooden trowel.
136.03 REMOVAL OF SNOW, ICE, AND ACCUMULATIONS. It is the responsibility of the abutting property owners to remove snow, ice, and
accumulations promptly from sidewalks. If a property owner does not remove snow, ice, or accumulations within a reasonable time, the City may do so
and assess the costs against the property owner for collection in the same manner as a property tax.
(Code of Iowa, Sec. 364.12[2b & e])
136.04 RESPONSIBILITY FOR MAINTENANCE. It is the responsibility of the abutting property owners to repair, replace or reconstruct, or cause to be
repaired, replaced or reconstructed, all broken or defective sidewalks and to maintain in a safe and hazard-free condition any sidewalk outside the lot and
property lines and inside the curb lines or traveled portion of the public street.
(Code of Iowa, Sec. 364.12[2c])
136.05 CITY MAY ORDER REPAIRS. If the abutting property owner does not maintain sidewalks as required, the Council may serve notice on such
owner, by certified mail, requiring the owner to repair, replace or reconstruct sidewalks within a reasonable time and if such action is not completed within
the time stated in the notice, the Council may require the work to be done and assess the costs against the abutting property for collection in the same
manner as a property tax.
(Code of Iowa, Sec. 364.12[2d & e])
136.06 SIDEWALK CONSTRUCTION ORDERED. The Council may order the construction of permanent sidewalks upon any street or court in the City and
may specially assess the cost of such improvement to abutting property owners in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 384 of the Code of Iowa.
(Code of Iowa, Sec. 384.38)
136.07 PERMIT REQUIRED. No person shall remove, reconstruct, or install a sidewalk unless such person has obtained a permit from the City and has
agreed in writing that said removal, reconstruction, or installation will comply with all ordinances and requirements of the City for such work. The permit
will include any special allowances, such as location or grade variances, and the permittee will be furnished with a copy of the City’s sidewalk regulations.
STAR Report
Page 17 of 94
136.08 SIDEWALK STANDARDS. Sidewalks repaired, replaced, or constructed under the provisions of this chapter shall be of the following construction
and meet the following standards:
1. Cement. Portland cement shall be the only cement used in the construction and repair of sidewalks.
2. Construction. Sidewalks shall be of one-course construction.
3. Sidewalk Base. Concrete may be placed directly on compact and well-drained soil. Where soil is not well drained, a three-inch sub-base
of compact, clean, coarse gravel or sand shall be laid. The adequacy of the soil drainage is to be determined by the City.
4. Sidewalk Bed. The sidewalk bed shall be so graded that the constructed sidewalk will be at established grade.
5. Length, Width and Depth. Length, width and depth requirements are as follows:
A. Residential sidewalks shall be at least four (4) feet wide and four (4) inches thick, and each section shall be no more than four (4)
feet in length.
B. Business District sidewalks shall extend from the property line to the curb. Each section shall be four (4) inches thick and no more
than six (6) feet in length.
C. Driveway areas shall be not less than six (6) inches in thickness.
6. Location. When a residential sidewalk is constructed, it shall be located so that there is a distance of one foot between the property line
and the sidewalk unless a different location is approved by the inspector in the sidewalk construction permit. No sidewalk shall be repaired,
replaced or reconstructed so as to change the location of the sidewalk unless such change is similarly approved by the inspector.
7. Grade. Curb tops shall be on level with the centerline of the street, which is the established grade.
8. Elevations. The street edge of a sidewalk shall be at an elevation even with the curb at the curb or not less than one-half (½) inch above
the curb for each foot between the curb and the sidewalk.
9. Abutting Sidewalks. If either end of a sidewalk abuts on an existing sidewalk, it shall be constructed, replaced, or reconstructed so as to
meet the grade of the abutting sidewalk and the standards set out in subsections 6, 7, and 8 of this section may be modified to the minimum
extent necessary to meet the grade of the abutting sidewalk.
10. Exceptions to Grade Requirements. If the designated inspector finds that, owing to special conditions, a literal enforcement of the
provisions of subsections 6, 7, and 8 of this section will result in unnecessary hardship, the inspector may, in specific cases, authorize such variance
from the provisions of said subsections as is necessary to avoid such unnecessary hardship.
11. Slope. All sidewalks shall slope one-quarter (¼) inch per foot toward the curb.
12. Finish. All sidewalks shall be finished with a “broom” or “wood float” finish.
13. Curb Ramps and Sloped Areas for Persons with Disabilities. If a street, road, or highway is newly built or reconstructed, a curb ramp or
sloped area shall be constructed or installed at each intersection of the street, road, or highway with a sidewalk or path. If a sidewalk or path is
STAR Report
Page 18 of 94
newly built or reconstructed, a curb ramp or sloped area shall be constructed or installed at each intersection of the sidewalk or path with a street,
highway, or road. Curb ramps and sloped areas that are required pursuant to this subsection shall be constructed or installed in compliance with
applicable Federal requirements adopted in accordance with the Federal Americans with Disabilities Act, including (but not limited to) the
guidelines issued by the Federal Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board.
(Code of Iowa, Sec. 216C.9)
136.09 BARRICADES AND WARNING LIGHTS. Whenever any material of any kind is deposited on any street, avenue, highway, passageway or alley
when sidewalk improvements are being made or when any sidewalk is in a dangerous condition, it shall be the duty of all persons having an interest
therein, either as the contractor or the owner, agent, or lessee of the property in front of or along which such material may be deposited, or such dangerous
condition exists, to put in conspicuous places at each end of such sidewalk and at each end of any pile of material deposited in the street, a sufficient
number of approved warning lights or flares, and to keep them lighted during the entire night and to erect sufficient barricades both at night and in the
daytime to secure the same. The party or parties using the street for any of the purposes specified in this chapter shall be liable for all injuries or damage
to persons or property arising from any wrongful act or negligence of the party or parties, or their agents or employees or for any misuse of the privileges
conferred by this chapter or of any failure to comply with provisions hereof.
136.10 FAILURE TO REPAIR OR BARRICADE. It is the duty of the owner of the property abutting the sidewalk, or the owner’s contractor or agent, to
notify the City immediately in the event of failure or inability to make necessary sidewalk improvements or to install or erect necessary barricades as
required by this chapter.
136.11 INTERFERENCE WITH SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS. No person shall knowingly or willfully drive any vehicle upon any portion of any sidewalk or
approach thereto while in the process of being improved or upon any portion of any completed sidewalk or approach thereto, or shall remove or destroy
any part or all of any sidewalk or approach thereto, or shall remove, destroy, mar or deface any sidewalk at any time or destroy, mar, remove or deface
any notice provided by this chapter.
136.12 AWNINGS. It is unlawful for a person to erect or maintain any awning over any sidewalk unless all parts of the awning are elevated at least eight
(8) feet above the surface of the sidewalk and the roof or covering is made of duck, canvas or other suitable material supported by iron frames or brackets
securely fastened to the building, without any posts or other device that will obstruct the sidewalk or hinder or interfere with the free passage of
pedestrians.
136.13 ENCROACHING STEPS. It is unlawful for a person to erect or maintain any stairs or steps to any building upon any part of any sidewalk without
permission by resolution of the Council.
136.14 OPENINGS AND ENCLOSURES. It is unlawful for a person to:
1. Stairs and Railings. Construct or build a stairway or passageway to any cellar or basement by occupying any part of the sidewalk, or to
enclose any portion of a sidewalk with a railing without permission by resolution of the Council.
STAR Report
Page 19 of 94
2. Openings. Keep open any cellar door, grating, or cover to any vault on any sidewalk except while in actual use with adequate guards to
protect the public.
3. Protect Openings. Neglect to properly protect or barricade all openings on or within six (6) feet of any sidewalk.
136.15 FIRES OR FUEL ON SIDEWALKS. It is unlawful for a person to make a fire of any kind on any sidewalk or to place or allow any fuel to remain
upon any sidewalk.
136.16 DEFACING. It is unlawful for a person to scatter or place any paste, paint, or writing on any sidewalk.
(Code of Iowa, Sec. 716.1)
136.17 DEBRIS ON SIDEWALKS. It is unlawful for a person to throw or deposit on any sidewalk any glass, nails, glass bottle, tacks, wire, cans, trash,
garbage, rubbish, litter, offal, or any other debris, or any substance likely to injure any person, animal, or vehicle.
(Code of Iowa, Sec. 364.12[2])
136.18 MERCHANDISE DISPLAY. It is unlawful for a person to place upon or above any sidewalk, any goods or merchandise for sale or for display in
such a manner as to interfere with the free and uninterrupted passage of pedestrians on the sidewalk; in no case shall more than three (3) feet of the
sidewalk next to the building be occupied for such purposes.
136.19 SALES STANDS. It is unlawful for a person to erect or keep any vending machine or stand for the sale of fruit, vegetables or other substances or
commodities on any sidewalk without first obtaining a written permit from the Council.
136.20 WATER SPOUTS. It is unlawful to cause or permit any water spout, trough, gutter or balcony extending from any building (owned or leased) to
discharge or conduct water upon the surface of any public sidewalk.
STAR Report
Page 20 of 94
Appendix B: Iowa League of Cities and the Iowa Code
STAR Report
Page 21 of 94
Iowa League of Cities
Zoning & Building
Right of Way Responsibilities
Web Exclusive June 2014
Cities are responsible for maintaining most of the public property in the community, including the city streets. However, there are some questions
regarding who is responsible for other parts of the public right of way (ROW), such as sidewalks and alleys. City officials should have a good
understanding of who is responsible for maintaining the right of way so they can effectively plan for future improvements. As detailed in Code of Iowa
Section 364.12, cities are responsible for keeping all public grounds “in repair, and free of nuisance." This includes streets, sidewalks, alleys, bridges and
a number of other public properties. However, the law does provide some exceptions and places specific responsibilities on abutting property owners.
Sidewalk Maintenance Requirements and Responsibilities
The Code allows cities to enact ordinances that require abutting property owners to maintain and repair sidewalks (this is often detailed in a city’s
nuisance ordinance). Approving a sidewalk program that addresses issues such as maintenance, repair, replacement and installation can provide a sound
long-term plan for citizens, council members and city employees. These plans should address the requirements for maintaining sidewalks, how and
when the city will inspect sidewalks, and how the program will be funded. Such programs can be funded by the city, by property owners directly or
through special assessments on the property owner’s taxes. Cities often use a combination of these sources to fund sidewalk programs. Cities also have
the authority to approve ordinances that require the installation of sidewalks following proper notice. This is typically done to address areas of the city
that do not have a sidewalk or where new construction occurs.
Removal of Snow and Ice from Sidewalks
Code of Iowa Section 364.12(2)(b) places the onus of removing natural accumulations of snow and ice from sidewalks on the abutting property owners.
The law states that this must be done within a reasonable time and that property owners may be liable for damages caused by the failure to, “use
reasonable care in the removal of the snow or ice.” Most city ordinances contain these provisions and provide definition on what is considered
reasonable (such as clearing sidewalks within 48 or 72 hours).Many city ordinances also address the issue of a property owner failing to remove snow
and ice in the prescribed timeframe. In these situations, the city may perform the necessary work and assess the cost to the property owner in the same
manner as a property tax. The Code states that the city's general duty does not include the removal of natural accumulations of snow and ice from
sidewalks. However, when the city is the abutting property owner, it must remove the snow and ice accumulations as any other abutting property
owner.
Maintaining Other Parts of the ROW
According to Code Section 364.12(2)(c), cities are permitted to require property owners to maintain the ROW. The law specifically says this can include
the area between the street and sidewalk. City councils should approve an ordinance that details this requirement and give the city the authority to
enforce its provisions. Typically, such an ordinance requires the property owner to keep the sidewalk and ROW safe and in a hazard-free condition,
which includes mowing the area between the street and sidewalk. In addition, cities can require property owners to maintain trees that are in the ROW,
including trimming trees when necessary and clearing any debris. However, property owners cannot be required to remove diseased trees or dead
STAR Report
Page 22 of 94
wood from publicly owned property or the ROW. Most cities find that existing trees located in the city ROW are an annual financial burden. For this
reason, many cities have decided to adopt a tree ordinance that specifically prohibits planting trees in the ROW, thus limiting future liabilities.
Funding ROW Maintenance
Cities have several options for funding ROW maintenance and repair projects. Obviously, cities can use the general fund to pay for such costs. They can
also use Road Use Tax funds if the work to be done is part of the platted street system. Local Option Sales Tax funds can be used if the revenue purpose
statement allows for such use. The city can sell bonds or agree to a loan to raise money. Finally, the city can assess abutting property owners to help pay
for the improvements.
IOWA CODE
The entire Chapter 364 of the Iowa Code has not been included within this appendix, but codes that could be referenced in regards to somatic
transportation and reference for this report.
364.12 RESPONSIBILITY FOR PUBLIC PLACES.
1. As used in this section, "property owner" means the contract purchaser if there is one of record, otherwise the record holder of legal title.
2. A city shall keep all public grounds, streets, sidewalks, alleys, bridges, culverts, overpasses, underpasses, grade crossing separations and
approaches, public ways, squares, and commons open, in repair, and free from nuisance, with the following exceptions:
a. Public ways and grounds may be temporarily closed by resolution. Following notice as provided in section 362.3, public ways and
grounds may be vacated by ordinance.
b. The abutting property owner is responsible for the removal of the natural accumulations of snow and ice from the sidewalks within a
reasonable amount of time and may be liable for damages caused by the failure of the abutting property owner to use reasonable care in the
removal of the snow or ice. If damages are to be awarded under this section against the abutting property owner, the claimant has the burden
of proving the amount of the damages. To authorize recovery of more than a nominal amount, facts must exist and be shown by the evidence
which afford a reasonable basis for measuring the amount of the claimant's actual damages, and the amount of actual damages shall not be
determined by speculation, conjecture, or surmise. All legal or equitable defenses are available to the abutting property owner in an action
brought pursuant to this paragraph. The city's general duty under this subsection does not include a duty to remove natural accumulations of
snow or ice from the sidewalks. However, when the city is the abutting property owner it has the specific duty of the abutting property owner
set forth in this paragraph.
c. The abutting property owner may be required by ordinance to maintain all property outside the lot and property lines and inside the
curb lines upon the public streets, except that the property owner shall not be required to remove diseased trees or dead wood on the publicly
owned property or right-of-way.
d. A city may serve notice on the abutting property owner, by certified mail to the property owner as shown by the records of the county
auditor, requiring the abutting property owner to repair, replace, or reconstruct sidewalks.
STAR Report
Page 23 of 94
e. If the abutting property owner does not perform an action required under this subsection within a reasonable time, a city may perform
the required action and assess the costs against the abutting property for collection in the same manner as a property tax. This power does not
relieve the abutting property owner of liability imposed under paragraph "b".
f. A city has no duty under this subsection with respect to property that is required by law to be maintained by a railway company.
3. A city may:
a. Require the abatement of a nuisance, public or private, in any reasonable manner.
b. Require the removal of diseased trees or dead wood, except as stated in subsection 2, paragraph "c" of this section.
c. Require the removal, repair, or dismantling of a dangerous building or structure.
d. Require the numbering of buildings.
e. Require connection to public drainage systems from abutting property when necessary for public health or safety.
f. Require connection to public sewer systems from abutting property, and require installation of sanitary toilet facilities and removal of
other toilet facilities on such property.
g. Require the cutting or destruction of weeds or other growth which constitutes a health, safety, or fire hazard.
h. If the property owner does not perform an action required under this subsection within a reasonable time after notice, a city may
perform the required action and assess the costs against the property for collection in the same manner as a property tax. Notice may be in the
form of an ordinance or by certified mail to the property owner as shown by the records of the county auditor, and shall state the time within
which action is required. However, in an emergency a city may perform any action which may be required under this section without prior
notice, and assess the costs as provided in this subsection, after notice to the property owner and hearing.
4. In addition to any other remedy provided by law, a city may also seek reimbursement for costs incurred in performing any act authorized by this
section by a civil action for damages against a property owner. However, a city shall not seek reimbursement for costs incurred in performing an act if
the same act has not been performed by the city on adjoining city-owned property. For the purposes of this subsection, a county acquiring property for
delinquent taxes shall not be considered a property owner.
5. A city may cause, without prior determination and notice, the repair or replacement of public improvements including, but not limited to,
sidewalks, water stop boxes, and driveway approaches if the property owner does all of the following:
a. Requests the repair and replacement of the public improvements specified in this subsection abutting the property owner's property
located outside the lot and property lines and inside the curb lines.
b. Waives the requirement of a prior finding by the city council that the condition of the public improvements constitutes a nuisance and
the requirement of prior notice.
c. Consents to the repair of the public improvements and the assessment of the cost of the repair to the abutting property.
6. If, in repairing and replacing improvements in the area between the lot or property lines and the curb lines pursuant to subsection 5, it becomes
necessary for the city to repair or replace adjacent improvements in the area, the cost of repairing or replacing the adjacent public improvements may
be assessed, with consent of the property owner, against the property which the public improvements abut.
7. A city may accumulate individual assessments for the repair and replacement of sidewalks, driveway approaches, water stop boxes, or similar
improvements or for the abatement of nuisances, and may periodically certify the assessments to the county treasurer under one or more assessment
schedules.
STAR Report
Page 24 of 94
364.13 INSTALLMENTS.
If any amount assessed against property under section 364.12 will exceed one hundred dollars, a city may permit the assessment to be paid in up to
ten annual installments, in the same manner and with the same interest rates provided for assessments against benefited property under chapter 384,
division IV.
364.13A SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS -- LIEN AND PRECEDENCE.
A special assessment levied pursuant to section 364.11 or 364.12, including all interest, is a lien against the benefited property from the date of
filing the schedule of assessments until the assessment is paid. Special assessments have equal precedence with ordinary taxes and are not divested by
judicial sale.
364.14 PERSONAL INJURIES.
When action is brought against a city for personal injuries alleged to have been caused by its negligence, the city may notify in writing any person
by whose negligence it claims the injury was caused. The notice shall state the pendency of the action, the name of the plaintiff, the name and location
of the court where the action is pending, a brief statement of the alleged facts from which the cause arose, that the city believes that the person notified
is liable to it for any judgment rendered against the city, and asking the person to appear and defend. A judgment obtained in the suit is conclusive in
any action by the city against any person so notified, as to the existence of the defect or other cause of the injury or damage, as to the liability of the city
to the plaintiff in the first named action, and as to the amount of the damage or injury. A city may maintain an action against the person notified to
recover the amount of the judgment together with all the expenses incurred by the city in the suit.
364.18 FEDERAL AID.
Subject to applicable state or federal regulations in effect at the time of the city action, a city may accept contributions, grants, or other financial
assistance from the state or federal government. Upon a finding of public purpose, the city may disburse the assistance to any person to be used for
economic development projects, including but not limited to the purchase or improvement of land and buildings for residential, commercial, or
industrial use.
364.22 MUNICIPAL INFRACTIONS.
1. a. A municipal infraction is a civil offense punishable by a civil penalty of not more than seven hundred fifty dollars for each violation or if the
infraction is a repeat offense, a civil penalty not to exceed one thousand dollars for each repeat offense. However, notwithstanding section 364.3, a
municipal infraction arising from noncompliance with a pretreatment standard or requirement, referred to in 40 C.F.R. § 403.8, by an industrial user may
be punishable by a civil penalty of not more than one thousand dollars for each day a violation exists or continues.
b. (1) A city may classify a municipal infraction, other than a violation arising from noncompliance with a pretreatment standard
or requirement, as an environmental violation if the infraction is a violation of chapter 455B or 459, subchapters II and III, or a violation of a standard
established by the city in consultation with the department of natural resources, or both. The discharge of airborne residue from grain, created by the
handling, drying, or storing of grain by a person, shall not be subject to an ordinance, the violation of which is classified as an environmental violation,
unless the person is engaged in industrial production or manufacturing of grain products. The discharge of airborne residue from grain, created by the
handling, drying, or storing of grain by a person engaged in industrial production or manufacturing of grain products, shall not be subject to an
STAR Report
Page 25 of 94
ordinance, the violation of which is classified as an environmental violation, if the discharge occurs from September 15 to January 15. A municipal
infraction which is classified an environmental violation is punishable by a civil penalty of not more than one thousand dollars for each occurrence. A
person committing an environmental violation is not subject to a civil penalty, if all of the following conditions are satisfied:
(a) The violation results solely from the person conducting an initial start-up, cleaning, repairing, performing scheduled
maintenance, testing, or conducting a shutdown, of either equipment causing the violation or the equipment designed to reduce or eliminate the
violation.
(b) The person notifies the city of the violation within twenty-four hours from the time that the violation begins.
(c) The violation does not continue in existence for more than eight hours.
(2) A city shall not enforce this section against a person committing an environmental violation, until the city offers to participate in
informal negotiations with the person. If the person accepts the offer, the city and the person shall participate in good faith negotiations to resolve
issues alleged to be the basis for the violation.
2. A city by ordinance may provide that a violation of an ordinance is a municipal infraction.
3. A city shall not provide that a violation of an ordinance is a municipal infraction if the violation is a felony, an aggravated misdemeanor, or a
serious misdemeanor under state law or if the violation is a simple misdemeanor under chapters 687 through 747.
4. An officer authorized by a city to enforce a city code or regulation may issue a civil citation to a person who commits a municipal infraction. A
copy of the citation may be served by personal service as provided in rule of civil procedure 1.305, by certified mail addressed to the defendant at the
defendant's last known mailing address, return receipt requested, or by publication in the manner as provided in rule of civil procedure 1.310 and
subject to the conditions of rule of civil procedure 1.311. A copy of the citation shall be retained by the issuing officer, and the original citation shall be
sent to the clerk of the district court. The citation shall serve as notification that a civil offense has been committed and shall contain the following
information:
a. The name and address of the defendant.
b. The name or description of the infraction attested to by the officer issuing the citation.
c. The location and time of the infraction.
d. The amount of civil penalty to be assessed or the alternate relief sought, or both.
e. The manner, location, and time in which the penalty may be paid.
f. The time and place of court appearance.
g. The penalty for failure to appear in court.
5. In municipal infraction proceedings:
a. The matter shall be tried before a magistrate, a district associate judge, or a district judge in the same manner as a small claim. The matter
shall only be tried before a judge in district court if the total amount of civil penalties assessed exceeds the jurisdictional amount for small claims
set forth in section 631.1.
b. The city has the burden of proof that the municipal infraction occurred and that the defendant committed the infraction. The proof shall be
by clear, satisfactory, and convincing evidence.
c. The court shall ensure that the defendant has received a copy of the charges and that the defendant understands the charges. The defendant
may question all witnesses who appear for the city and produce evidence or witnesses on the defendant's behalf.
d. The defendant may be represented by counsel of the defendant's own selection and at the defendant's own expense.
STAR Report
Page 26 of 94
e. The defendant may answer by admitting or denying the infraction.
f. If a municipal infraction is proven the court shall enter a judgment against the defendant. If the infraction is not proven, the court shall
dismiss it.
6. All penalties or forfeitures collected by the court for municipal infractions shall be remitted to the city in the same manner as fines and
forfeitures are remitted for criminal violations under section 602.8106. If the person named in the citation is served as provided in this section and fails
without good cause to appear in response to the civil citation, judgment shall be entered against the person cited.
7. A person against whom judgment is entered, shall pay court costs and fees as in small claims under chapter 631. If the action is dismissed, the
city is liable for the court costs and court fees. Where the action is disposed of without payment, or provision for assessment, of court costs, the clerk
shall at once enter judgment for costs against the city.
8. Seeking a civil penalty as authorized in this section does not preclude a city from seeking alternative relief from the court in the same action.
9. a. When judgment has been entered against a defendant, the court may do any of the following:
(1) Impose a civil penalty by entry of a personal judgment against the defendant.
(2) Direct that payment of the civil penalty be suspended or deferred under conditions imposed by the court.
(3) Grant appropriate alternative relief ordering the defendant to abate or cease the violation.
(4) Authorize the city to abate or correct the violation.
(5) Order that the city's costs for abatement or correction of the violation be entered as a personal judgment against the defendant
or assessed against the property where the violation occurred, or both.
b. If a defendant willfully violates the terms of an order imposed by the court, the failure is contempt.
c. A magistrate or district associate judge shall have jurisdiction to assess or enter judgment for costs of abatement or correction in an
amount not to exceed the jurisdictional amount for a money judgment in a civil action pursuant to section 631.1, subsection 1, for magistrates
and section 602.6306, subsection 2, for district associate judges. If the city seeks abatement or correction costs in excess of those amounts, and
the matter is not before a judge in district court, the case shall be referred to the district court for hearing and entry of an appropriate order.
The procedure for hearing in the district court shall be the same procedure as that for a small claims appeal pursuant to section 631.13.
10. The defendant or the city may file a motion for a new trial or may appeal the decision of a magistrate, district associate judge, or a district judge
to the district court. The procedure on appeal shall be the same as for a small claim pursuant to section 631.13. A factual determination made by the
trial court, supported by substantial evidence as shown in the record, is binding for purposes of appeal relating to the violation at issue, but shall not be
admissible or binding as to any future violation for the same or similar ordinance provision by the same defendant.
11. This section does not preclude a peace officer of a city from issuing a criminal citation for a violation of a city code or regulation if criminal
penalties are also provided for the violation. Each day that a violation occurs or is permitted to exist by the defendant, constitutes a separate offense.
12. The issuance of a civil citation for a municipal infraction or the ensuing court proceedings do not provide an action for false arrest, false
imprisonment, or malicious prosecution.
13. An action brought pursuant to this section for a municipal infraction which is an environmental violation does not preclude, and is in addition
to, any other enforcement action which may be brought pursuant to chapter 455B, 455D, 455E, or 459, subchapters II, III, and VI.
14. A police department may dispose of personal property under section 80.39.
STAR Report
Page 27 of 94
STAR Report
Page 28 of 94
Appendix C: STAR Spreadsheets
STAR Report
Page 29 of 94
Address Corner C Trans Ramp II Ramp = CB LC JS MC JF TOTAL Rating Notes
1ST STREET
700 N 0 3.00
710 N 0 3.00
120 Ruby N 0 3.00
800 Ruby N 0 3.00
801* Pearl N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00
103 Pearl N 0 3.00
916 Iowa 1 N 0 3.00
100 Iowa* 1 N N N 0 3.00
103* Iowa 1 0 1 0 2 1 6 2.40
105 Iowa* N 0 3.00
1004 0 1 0 0 1 3 1.20
100 Diamond N 0 1 0 0 1 3 1.20
1001 Diamond N 0 3.00
1107 Diamond N 0 3.00
1102* Diamond N N 0 1 0 0 1 3 1.20
1106 1 1 0 1 1 5.5 2.20
1108 1 1 0 0 3 8 3.20
1112 1 1 0 3 1 8.5 3.40
1122* Marble N N 2 2 0 3 2 12.5 5.50
1200 Marble N 0 3.00
1201 N N 0 1 0 0 2 5 4.00
1204 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00
1210 0 1 0 0 2 5 2.00
1214 1 1 0 0 1 4 1.60
1221* Granite 1 0 0 0 1 3 1.20
103* Granite 1 0 0 0 1 3 1.20
220 Granite* 1 N 0 3.00
1301 Granite N 0 3.00
1306 0 1 0 0 2 5 2.00
STAR Report
Page 30 of 94
1312 1 1 0 2 1 7 2.80
1318* Maple N 0 0 0 0 0 0 3.00
1400 Maple N 0 3.00
1401 N 0 3.00
STAR Report
Page 31 of 94
Address Corner C Trans Ramp II Ramp = CB LC JS MC JF TOTAL Rating Notes
2ND STREET
500 Emerald N N 0 3.00
501 Emerald N N 0 3.00
506 N 0 3.00
510 N 0 3.00
516 N 0 3.00
520 Jasper N N N 0 3.00
523 Jasper N N N 0 3.00
600 Jasper N N N 0 3.00
601 Jasper N N N 0 3.00
612 N 0 3.00
612 N 0 3.00
204 Cameo N N N 0 3.00
623 Cameo N N N 0 3.00
702 Cameo N N N 0 3.00
703 Cameo N N N 0 3.00
706 N 0 3.00
714 N 0 3.00
715 N 0 3.00
718 N 0 3.00
719 Ruby N N N 0 3.00
722 Ruby N N N 0 3.00
801* Ruby 1 N 0 1 0 0 1 3 1.20
812 Ruby N N 0 0 0 0 1 2 0.80
816 0 0 0 0 1 2 0.80
821 Pearl 1 N N 0 1 0 0 2 5 2.00
822* Pearl N N 1 1 0 1 3 9.5 3.80
901 Pearl N N N 0 3.00
902 Pearl N 2 1 0 2 2 10 4.00
905 N 0 3.00
STAR Report
Page 32 of 94
908 1 1 0 2 2 9 3.60
909 N 0 3.00
910 0 0 0 1 1 3.5 1.40
913 N 0 3.00
914 1 1 0 1 2 7.5 3.00
120 Iowa 1 N 1 1 0 1 2 7.5 3.00
112 Iowa* N 0 3.00
202 Iowa 1 N 1 1 0 0 2 6 2.40
206 Iowa* 0 2 0 0 3 8 3.20
119 Iowa 1 N N 0 3.00
201 Iowa 1 N 2 0 1 0 1 5.25 2.10
1008 1 1 0 0 2 6 2.40
1012 1 1 0 2 2 9 3.60
1017 Diamond N N 3 2 1 3 1 12.75 5.10
1018* Diamond N 1 1 0 3 3 12.5 5.00
1101* Diamond N N 0 0 0 0 2 4 1.60
1104* Diamond N N 1 0 0 1 3 8.5 3.40
1107 1 1 0 1 2 7.5 3.00
1111 1 1 0 2 0 5 2.00
1112 0 0 0 0 1 2 0.80
1114 0 0 0 0 1 2 0.80
1115 2 1 1 0 1 6.25 2.50
1117 1 1 0 3 0 6.5 2.60
1120 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00
1123* Marble N N 2 1 1 1 0 5.75 2.30
202* Marble N N 1 1 0 0 0 2 0.80
1201* Marble N N 0 3 0 0 3 9 3.60
1207 0 1 0 0 1 3 1.20
1209 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00
1212 0 0 0 0 1 2 0.80
1215 0 1 0 0 1 3 1.20
STAR Report
Page 33 of 94
1220 Granite N N 0 1 0 0 1 3 1.20
1223* Granite N N 0 0 0 0 3 6 2.40
207* Granite N N 2 1 0 0 1 5 2.00
105* Granite N N 0 0 0 0 3 6 2.40
1301* 0 1 1 3 1 8.75 3.50
1308 1 1 1 0 1 5.25 2.10
1315 0 1 0 0 2 5 2.00
1319 0 1 0 1 1 4.5 1.80
1321 Maple N N 1 1 0 0 1 4 1.60
204 Maple N N 1 0 0 1 3 8.5 3.40
203 Maple N N 0 1 0 0 1 3 1.20
1408 0 1 0 0 1 3 1.20
1410 1 1 0 0 1 4 1.60
1411 Maple N N N 0 3.00
1417 N 0 3.00
STAR Report
Page 34 of 94
Address Corner C Trans Ramp II Ramp = CB LC JS MC JF TOTAL Rating Notes
3RD STREET
500* Emerald N 1 1 0 2 1 7 2.80
501* Emerald N N 1 1 0 0 1 4 1.60
504 0 0 0 0 2 4 1.60
507 1 1 0 1 3 9.5 3.80
510 0 1 0 1 0 2.5 1.00
513 1 1 1 1 0 4.75 1.90
514 0 0 0 0 2 4 1.60
518 0 0 0 0 1 2 0.80
519* Jasper N N 0 0 0 0 1 2 0.80
308* Jasper N N 1 1 0 0 1 4 1.60
600 Jasper N N 2 1 1 3 1 10.75 4.30
603* Jasper N N 0 0 1 0 2 5.25 2.10
609 0 0 0 0 2 4 1.60
613 1 1 0 0 0 2 0.80
210* Cameo N N 0 0 0 0 1 2 0.80
700 Cameo 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00
701* Cameo N N 2 1 0 2 1 8 3.20
709 0 1 0 0 2 5 2.00
715 1 2 0 0 1 5 2.00
717 0 0 0 0 2 4 1.60
721* Ruby N N 0 0 0 0 1 2 0.80
750 Ruby 1 1 1 0 0 3.25 1.30
801* Ruby N 0 1 0 3 3 11.5 4.60
802 Ruby N 0 0 0 0 2 4 1.60
804 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.40
810 1 1 0 0 0 2 0.80
811 0 1 0 2 2 8 3.20
812 1 0 0 1 2 6.5 2.60
815 1 2 0 0 0 3 1.20
STAR Report
Page 35 of 94
817 1 0 0 0 1 3 1.20
818 1 1 0 0 1 4 1.60
212 Pearl N N 1 1 1 3 2 11.75 4.70
300 Pearl N N 1 1 0 0 3 8 3.20
900 Pearl N 0 1 0 3 3 11.5 4.60
901 Pearl N 1 1 0 0 1 4 1.60
902 0 3 0 0 1 5 2.00
905 2 1 0 2 0 6 2.40
911 0 0 0 0 1 2 0.80
912 0 1 0 1 1 4.5 1.80
915 1 1 0 1 2 7.5 3.00
302 Iowa 1 N N 0 0 0 0 1 2 0.80
308 Iowa* 0 1 0 2 0 4 1.60
201 Iowa 1 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00
208 Iowa* 1 1 0 0 2 6 2.40
214 Iowa N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00
301 Iowa N N 0 1 0 0 1 3 1.20
305 Iowa* 0 1 1 1 1 5.75 2.30
1010 0 0 0 0 3 6 2.40
1011 1 1 0 2 0 5 2.00
1014 1 1 1 0 2 7.25 2.90
1016 0 0.00
1019 1 2 0 0 1 5 2.00
1021 Diamond 1 2 0 0 1 5 2.00
300 Diamond N N 0 1 0 0 2 5 2.00
1100* Diamond N N 0 2 0 2 0 5 2.00
1103 Diamond N N 2 1 0 0 1 5 2.00
1104 0 1 0 0 2 5 2.00
1107 1 1 0 0 2 6 2.40
1109 0 1 0 0 3 7 2.80
1110 1 0 0 3 3 11.5 4.60
STAR Report
Page 36 of 94
1111 3 0 0 0 1 5 2.00
1112 1 1 0 3 2 10.5 4.20
1115 1 1 0 0 2 6 2.40
1116 2 2 0 3 2 12.5 5.00
1121* Marble N N 1 2 0 0 3 9 3.60
1122 Marble N N 1 1 0 0 2 6 2.40
1201 Marble N N 1 1 0 0 2 6 2.40
1202* Marble N N 0 1 0 0 2 5 2.00
1206 0 0 0 0 2 4 1.60
1210 0 0 0 0 1 2 0.80
1211 1 1 0 0 2 6 2.40
1214 1 0 0 2 1 6 2.40
1218 0 0 0 0 1 2 0.80
1220 Granite N N 1 1 0 0 0 2 0.80
1221 Granite N N 1 3 0 2 1 9 3.60
213* Granite N N 0 0 0 0 2 4 1.60
1304* Granite N N 0 1 0 0 1 3 1.20
1305 1 1 0 2 0 5 2.00
1308 1 1 0 0 2 6 2.40
1315 1 1 0 0 2 6 2.40
1316 0 1 0 2 2 8 3.20
1318 2 1 0 0 1 5 2.00
212* Maple N N 0 1 0 0 3 7 2.80
302 Maple N N 0 1 0 0 3 7 2.80
211 Maple N N 0 0 0 0 1 2 0.80
301 Maple N N 1 0 0 2 2 8 3.20
1405 0 0 0 0 1 2 0.80
1409 0 0 0 0 2 4 1.60
1413 0 0 1 0 0 1.25 0.50
1419 1 1 1 0 1 5.25 2.10
1424 1 1 0 3 0 6.5 2.60
STAR Report
Page 37 of 94
Address Corner C Trans Ramp II Ramp = CB LC JS MC JF TOTAL Rating Notes
4TH STREET
500* Emerald N 1 1 1 0 2 7.25 2.90
505 Emerald N N 0 3.00
506 0 1 0 0 2 5 2.00
508 0 0 0 0 1 2 0.80
511 N 0 3.00
514 N 0 3.00
515 N 0 3.00
518 N 0 3.00
523 Jasper N N N 0 3.00
524* Jasper N N 0 1 0 1 3 8.5 3.40
604 Jasper N N 0 1 0 0 2 5 2.00
606 0 3 0 2 3 12 4.80
608 1 0 0 0 0 1 0.40
611 Jasper 1 N N 0 1 1 0 3 8.25 3.30
612 2 2 0 1 1 7.5 3.00
620 Cameo N N 3 3 0 3 3 16.5 6.60
701 Cameo 0 0 1 0 0 1.25 0.50
702 Cameo N N 0 3 0 0 3 9 3.60
712 0 3 0 0 3 9 3.60
716 0 0 0 0 1 2 0.80
722 Ruby N N 0 0 0 0 3 6 2.40
315* Ruby N 0 0 0 0 1 2 0.80
723 Ruby 2 1 1 1 0 5.75 2.30
802 Ruby N 0 1 0 0 3 7 2.80
804 0 0 0 0 3 6 2.40
807 1 0 0 0 1 3 1.20
808 1 1 0 0 0 2 0.80
809 0 0 1 0 1 3.25 1.30
811 0 1 0 0 1 3 1.20
STAR Report
Page 38 of 94
814 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00
816 0 1 0 1 3 8.5 3.40
308 Pearl* 0 0 0 3 1 6.5 2.60
314 Pearl 0 1 0 2 2 8 3.20
404 Pearl N N 2 1 0 1 0 4.5 1.80
900 Pearl N N 1 3 0 2 1 9 3.60
901 Pearl N N 0 2 0 0 3 8 3.20
906 0 1 0 0 1 3 1.20
907 0 2 0 0 1 4 1.60
908 2 1 0 3 2 11.5 4.60
911 0 1 0 0 2 5 2.00
914 0 1 0 1 1 4.5 1.80
915 1 1 0 1 2 7.5 3.00
314 Iowa 1 N 0 1 0 0 1 3 1.20
402 Iowa N N 0 1 0 3 2 9.5 3.80
406 Iowa 1 0 0 0 0 1 2 0.80
309 Iowa* 0 0 0 0 1 2 0.80
313 Iowa N N 1 1 0 3 3 12.5 5.00
401* Iowa N N 0 1 1 3 3 12.75 5.10
1009 0 1 0 1 1 4.5 1.80
1010 N 0 3.00
1013 1 1 0 1 1 5.5 2.20
1014 N 0 3.00
1019 1 1 0 0 1 4 1.60
312 Diamond 1 1 0 0 2 6 2.40
402* Diamond N N 1 1 0 3 2 10.5 4.20
1100 Diamond N N 0 1 0 0 1 3 1.20
1101* Diamond N N 0 1 0 1 3 8.5 3.40
1105 1 1 0 0 2 6 2.40
1106 1 1 0 0 3 8 3.20
1109 0 2 0 0 3 8 3.20
STAR Report
Page 39 of 94
1110 N 0 3.00
1112 N 0 3.00
1113 2 1 0 0 3 9 3.60
1116 N 0 3.00
1117* Marble N N 0 0 0 3 3 10.5 4.20
402 Marble N N N 0 3.00
1200* Marble N N 0 1 0 0 3 7 2.80
1201* Marble N N 1 1 0 0 1 4 1.60
1203 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.40
1204 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00
1208 0 1 0 0 2 5 2.00
1209 1 1 0 0 1 4 1.60
1212 0 1 0 0 3 7 2.80
1215 0 0 0 0 3 6 2.40
1216 0 1 0 0 2 5 2.00
1221 1 0 0 0 3 7 2.80
1223 Granite N N 0 1 0 0 1 3 1.20
402 Granite N N 0 1 0 0 3 7 2.80
1301* Granite N N 0 1 0 0 1 3 1.20
1302* Granite N N 0 0 0 0 1 2 0.80
1306 0 0 0 0 1 2 0.80
1308 0 1 0 0 1 3 1.20
1312 1 1 0 0 2 6 2.40
1313 Maple N N 1 1 0 0 2 6 2.40
404 Maple N N 1 1 0 0 3 8 3.20
1401 Maple 0 0 0 0 1 2 0.80
1402* Maple 0 1 0 0 1 3 1.20
1409 N 0 3.00
1410 N 0 3.00
1414 0 0 0 0 1 2 0.80
1416 N 0 3.00
STAR Report
Page 40 of 94
1417 N 0 3.00
1420 N 0 3.00
STAR Report
Page 41 of 94
Address Corner C Trans Ramp II Ramp = CB LC JS MC JF TOTAL Rating Notes
5TH STREET
413 Emerald N N 0 3.00
508 Emerald N N 0 3.00
500 Emerald N 0 3.00
504 N 0 3.00
510 N 0 3.00
513 N 0 3.00
514 N 0 3.00
517 N 0 3.00
518 N 0 3.00
523* Jasper N N 0 1 0 1 1 4.5 1.80
502* Jasper N N 0 1 0 0 1 3 1.20
600 Jasper N N N 0 3.00
603* Jasper N N 0 0 0 0 1 2 0.80
610 0 1 0 3 2 9.5 3.80
611 0 1 0 0 3 7 2.80
614 0 1 0 0 3 7 2.80
615 0 2 0 0 3 8 3.20
618 0 1 0 0 1 3 1.20
622* Cameo N N 1 2 0 3 2 11.5 4.60
414* Cameo N N 0 1 1 3 1 8.75 3.50
415* Cameo N N 0 1 0 1 1 4.5 1.80
702* Cameo N N 1 1 0 1 2 7.5 3.00
706 N 0 3.00
707 N 0 3.00
710 1 1 0 0 0 2 0.80
711 N 0 3.00
712 N 0 3.00
713 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00
714 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.40
STAR Report
Page 42 of 94
715 N 0 3.00
414* Ruby N N 0 1 0 0 1 3 1.20
502 Ruby N N N 0 3.00
800* Ruby N N 1 1 0 1 2 7.5 3.00
801 Ruby N 1 2 0 0 1 5 2.00
803 0 0 1 3 1 7.75 3.10
804 0 0 0 0 3 6 2.40
808 1 1 0 0 3 8 3.20
809 0 1 0 3 1 7.5 3.00
813 0 1 0 0 3 7 2.80
816 1 3 0 1 2 9.5 3.80
817 1 2 0 0 2 7 2.80
412 Pearl N N 0 2 0 3 2 10.5 4.20
502 Pearl N 2 2 0 3 3 14.5 5.80
900 Pearl N 0 1 0 0 2 5 2.00
901 Pearl N N 1 0 0 1 3 8.5 3.40
905 1 1 0 2 1 7 2.80
906 0 0 0 0 1 2 0.80
911 1 1 0 3 3 12.5 5.00
913 1 1 0 3 1 8.5 3.40
914 0 0 0 3 2 8.5 3.40
414 Iowa N N 1 1 0 3 1 8.5 3.40
500 Iowa N N 1 1 0 3 1 8.5 3.40
504 Iowa* 0 0 0 0 1 2 0.80
510 Iowa* 1 1 0 1 1 5.5 2.20
413 Iowa N N 1 1 0 1 2 7.5 3.00
509 Iowa* 0 1 0 0 2 5 2.00
1002 Iowa N N 1 2 0 3 2 11.5 4.60
1008 1 1 0 0 2 6 2.40
1009 0 1 0 0 1 3 1.20
1013 1 0 0 3 2 9.5 3.80
STAR Report
Page 43 of 94
1014 1 1 0 0 1 4 1.60
1019 1 2 0 2 1 8 3.20
414 Diamond N N 1 1 0 3 3 12.5 5.00
502 Diamond N N 0 1 0 1 3 8.5 3.40
1100* Diamond N N 1 0 0 2 0 4 1.60
1101* Diamond N N 2 1 0 1 1 6.5 2.60
1105 0 0 0 0 3 6 2.40
1106 0 1 0 0 2 5 2.00
1107 1 1 0 1 1 5.5 2.20
1108 0 0 0 0 1 2 0.80
1111 0 0 0 3 1 6.5 2.60
1112 1 1 0 2 3 11 4.40
1116 1 1 0 0 1 4 1.60
1117 0 3 0 0 2 7 2.80
412* Marble N N 0 0 0 0 2 4 1.60
1122 Marble N N 1 1 0 1 1 5.5 2.20
1200* Marble N N 1 1 0 0 2 6 2.40
1201* Marble N N 0 1 0 0 1 3 1.20
1204 0 1 0 0 3 7 2.80
1205 0 1 0 0 1 3 1.20
1209 1 2 0 2 3 12 4.80
1210 1 0 0 0 2 5 2.00
1212 0 1 0 0 1 3 1.20
1215 1 0 0 0 2 5 2.00
1217 0 0 0 0 1 2 0.80
1218 0 1 0 0 2 5 2.00
1222 Granite N N 1 0 0 0 3 7 2.80
1223 Granite N N 0 1 0 0 3 7 2.80
415 Granite N N 1 1 0 2 1 7 2.80
1300* Granite N N 0 1 0 0 2 5 2.00
1306 0 2 0 0 1 4 1.60
STAR Report
Page 44 of 94
1307 N 0 3.00
1310 0 1 0 0 2 5 2.00
1313 N 0 3.00
1314 0 0 0 0 1 2 0.80
1318 0 0 0 0 2 4 1.60
1320* Maple N N 0 0 0 0 3 6 2.40
1323* Maple N N 1 0 0 1 1 4.5 1.80
1400* Maple N N 1 2 0 0 1 5 2.00
1401* Maple N N 2 1 0 0 2 7 2.80
1405 N 0 3.00
1410 N 0 3.00
1415 N 0 3.00
1418 N 0 3.00
1419 N 0 3.00
1423 N 0 3.00
STAR Report
Page 45 of 94
Address Corner C Trans Ramp II Ramp = CB LC JS MC JF TOTAL Rating Notes
6TH STREET
500* Emerald N 1 2 0 0 1 5 2.00
501* Emerald N 1 2 0 0 1 5 2.00
505 1 3 0 2 1 9 3.60
506 1 0 0 0 1 3 1.20
507 0 0 0 0 2 4 1.60
510 1 0 1 0 0 2.25 0.90
515 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.40
516 0 1 0 0 2 5 2.00
522* Jasper 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00
523 Jasper N N 2 3 0 2 2 12 4.80
605* Jasper N 3 2 0 2 2 12 4.80
603* Jasper N N 0 2 0 0 2 6 2.40
604 1 1 0 0 2 6 2.40
605 1 3 0 0 1 6 2.40
608 2 1 0 2 2 10 4.00
609 0 1 0 0 1 3 1.20
612 3 1 0 0 2 8 3.20
613 1 2 0 2 2 10 4.00
617 2 2 0 2 2 11 4.40
621 Cameo N N 2 2 0 1 1 7.5 3.00
604 Cameo N N 1 3 1 2 2 12.25 4.90
702 Cameo N N 1 1 0 1 1 5.5 2.20
703 Cameo N N 1 3 0 2 2 11 4.40
707 0 1 0 0 1 3 1.20
710 1 2 0 3 1 9.5 3.80
711 0 1 0 0 2 5 2.00
713 0 2 0 0 2 6 2.40
716 1 1 0 3 2 10.5 4.20
717 1 1 0 0 1 4 1.60
STAR Report
Page 46 of 94
722* Ruby N N 1 1 0 2 2 9 3.60
723* Ruby N N 0 1 0 3 3 11.5 4.60
800* Ruby N N 1 0 0 0 2 5 2.00
803* Ruby N N 0 1 0 1 2 6.5 2.60
804 1 1 0 0 1 4 1.60
805 1 1 0 0 1 4 1.60
808 0 0 1 1 1 4.75 1.90
811 1 2 0 3 2 11.5 4.60
812 1 1 1 2 1 8.25 3.30
815 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00
817 1 2 0 2 2 10 4.00
512 Pearl 1 2 0 3 3 13.5 5.40
606 Pearl 3 3 0 3 3 16.5 6.60
MoCo CH Pearl 1 0 0 0 3 7 2.80
903 Pearl 0 1 0 0 2 5 2.00
907 0 1 0 0 1 3 1.20
911 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00
917 1 3 0 3 2 12.5 5.00
512 Iowa* 0 0 0 0 2 4 1.60
516 Iowa N 1 1 0 3 3 12.5 5.00
MoCo CH Iowa N 0 0 1 0 3 7.25 2.90
1002 Iowa N 2 1 0 0 1 5 2.00
1003 Iowa N 0 1 0 0 2 5 2.00
1008 0 1 0 0 3 7 2.80
1011 1 1 0 0 1 4 1.60
1014 0 0 0 0 2 4 1.60
1015 0 0 0 0 1 2 0.80
1020 0 0 0 0 2 4 1.60
1021 1 1 0 0 2 6 2.40
1025 1 0 0 0 0 1 0.40
STAR Report
Page 47 of 94
1030 0 0 0 0 2 4 1.60
1031 Diamond 1 1 0 3 3 12.5 5.00
1032 Diamond 1 2 0 1 1 6.5 2.60
603* Diamond N 1 1 0 1 2 7.5 3.00
1101* Diamond N 1 1 0 3 1 8.5 3.40
1106 0 0 0 0 1 2 0.80
1107 0 1 0 1 1 4.5 1.80
1109 0 1 0 0 2 5 2.00
1110 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.40
1112 0 1 0 3 0 5.5 2.20
1115 0 0 1 0 0 1.25 0.50
1116 3 1 0 0 0 4 1.60
1119 0 1 0 3 1 7.5 3.00
1120 Marble N N 2 1 0 3 2 11.5 4.60
1121 Marble N N 1 1 0 1 2 7.5 3.00
1202 Marble N N 1 2 0 3 2 11.5 4.60
1203* Marble N N 0 0 0 0 1 2 0.80
1206 1 1 0 1 1 5.5 2.20
1208 1 0 0 3 3 11.5 4.60
1209 0 1 0 3 2 9.5 3.80
1214 0 0 0 0 1 2 0.80
1215 0 0 0 3 3 10.5 4.20
1218 N 0 3.00
1219 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00
1222 Granite N N N 0 3.00
1223 Granite N N 0 3 0 2 3 12 4.80
1300 Granite 1 N N N 0 3.00
1301* Granite N N 0 1 0 3 2 9.5 3.80
1305 0 0 0 0 1 2 0.80
1311 1 1 0 0 2 6 2.40
1315 2 1 0 0 1 5 2.00
STAR Report
Page 48 of 94
1317 2 1 0 0 1 5 2.00
1323* Maple N N 1 1 0 3 3 12.5 5.00
1400 Maple N N N 0 3.00
1401 Maple N N 1 2 0 3 1 9.5 3.80
1407 1 2 0 3 1 9.5 3.80
1411 1 1 0 3 2 10.5 4.20
1413 0 1 0 0 1 3 1.20
1415 1 1 0 1 1 5.5 2.20
1500 N 0 3.00
1501 N 0 3.00
STAR Report
Page 49 of 94
Address Corner C Trans Ramp II Ramp = CB LC JS MC JF TOTAL Rating Notes
7TH STREET
502 Emerald N 0 3.00
501* Emerald 1 1 0 3 2 10.5 4.20
505 1 2 0 2 2 10 4.00
511 0 0 0 3 3 10.5 4.20
512 N 0 3.00
515 0 0 0 3 3 10.5 4.20
516 N 0 3.00
519 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.40
520 Jasper N N N 0 3.00
523* Jasper N 0 2 0 3 3 12.5 5.00
601* Jasper N 0 0 0 3 3 10.5 4.20
602 Jasper N N N 0 3.00
608 0 0 0 0 1 2 0.80
609 1 1 0 3 2 10.5 4.20
612 N 0 3.00
613 1 1 0 3 2 10.5 4.20
618 N 0 3.00
614 Cameo N N 0 0 0 3 3 10.5 4.20
702 Cameo N N 0 2 0 0 3 8 3.20
700 Cameo N N 0 0 0 0 2 4 1.60
703 Cameo N N 0 1 0 0 1 3 1.20
705 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00
712 2 1 0 2 2 10 4.00
713 0 0 0 1 1 3.5 1.40
718 1 0 0 1 1 4.5 1.80
719 Ruby N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00
720* Ruby N N 0 1 0 0 1 3 1.20
801* Ruby N N 1 0 0 0 1 3 1.20
802 Ruby N N 0 0 0 0 1 2 0.80
STAR Report
Page 50 of 94
803 0 2 0 2 3 11 4.40
806 0 0 0 3 3 10.5 4.20
808 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00
815 1 1 0 2 2 9 3.60
702 Pearl 1 1 0 3 3 12.5 5.00
612 Pearl 2 2 0 3 2 12.5 5.00
900 Pearl N 0 0 0 3 3 10.5 4.20
909 Pearl 1 N 0 1 1 0 1 4.25 1.70
906 1 0 0 0 0 3 6 2.40
910 1 0 0 0 0 2 4 1.60
610 Iowa 1 0 1 0 3 1 7.5 3.00
700 Iowa 1 0 1 0 3 1 7.5 3.00
704 Iowa* 0 2 0 1 2 7.5 3.00
706 Iowa* 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.40
708 Iowa* 1 0 0 0 0 1 2 0.80
710 Iowa* 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00
707 Iowa 1 N 2 1 2 1 2 11 4.40
1003 Iowa 2 1 0 0 2 7 2.80
1007 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00
1015 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00
1019 Diamond 1 1 0 0 1 4 1.60
707 Diamond 2 1 2 1 3 13 5.20
1102* Diamond N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00
1103* Diamond N 1 1 0 0 1 4 1.60
1105 2 3 0 0 1 7 2.80
1106 0 0 0 0 1 2 0.80
1108 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00
1109 1 1 0 0 0 2 0.80
1114 1 2 0 3 1 9.5 3.80
1115 0 0 0 0 1 2 0.80
1117 1 2 0 2 2 10 4.00
STAR Report
Page 51 of 94
1118 0 0 0 0 1 2 0.80
1122 Marble N 0 1 0 0 1 3 1.20
612 Marble 2 1 0 3 3 13.5 5.40
609 Marble N N N 0 3.00
700 Marble N N N 0 3.00
1205 1 2 0 1 2 8.5 3.40
1209 N 0 3.00
1213 2 2 0 2 3 13 5.20
1217 N 0 3.00
614 Granite N N N 0 3.00
1301 Granite N 0 1 0 0 1 3 1.20
700 Granite N N N 0 3.00
702 Granite N N N 0 3.00
STAR Report
Page 52 of 94
Address Corner C Trans Ramp II Ramp = CB LC JS MC JF TOTAL Rating Notes
8TH STREET
710 N 0 3.00
802 Emerald N N 0 3.00
804 Emerald* 1 N 0 3.00
500 Emerald N N N 0 3.00
715* Emerald N N 0 0 0 1 1 3.5 1.40
509 1 1 0 0 1 4 1.60
511 0 1 0 0 2 5 2.00
519 0 0 0 0 2 4 1.60
712* Jasper N N 0 0 0 0 1 2 0.80
522 Jasper N N 0 3.00
600 Jasper N N 0 3.00
713* Jasper N N 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.40
611 2 1 0 1 0 4.5 1.80
613 2 2 0 2 0 7 2.80
623 Cameo N N 1 3 0 0 2 8 3.20
622 Cameo N 0 3.00
700 Cameo N N 0 3.00
701 Cameo N N 0 1 1 0 2 6.25 2.50
713 0 1 0 3 1 7.5 3.00
717 0 0 0 0 1 2 0.80
714* Ruby N 0 0 0 3 3 10.5 4.20
803* Ruby N N 0 0 0 3 3 10.5 4.20
809 1 N 0 3.00
700 Pearl N N 0 3.00
721 Pearl 1 N N 0 3.00
814* Pearl N 1 1 0 0 2 6 2.40
900* Pearl 1 N 1 0 1 0 1 4.25 1.70
901 N 0 3.00
911 N 0 3.00
STAR Report
Page 53 of 94
945 N 0 3.00
720 Iowa 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00
718 Iowa* 1 0 1 0 3 1 7.5 3.00
800 Iowa 1 1 1 1 1 1 6.75 2.70
806 Iowa* 1 1 1 0 1 0 3.5 1.40
808 Iowa* 1 1 1 0 0 0 2 0.80
801 Iowa 1 N N 1 1 0 2 1 7 2.80
803 Iowa* 1 0 1 0 2 1 6 2.40
805 Iowa* 1 0 0 0 1 1 3.5 1.40
807 Iowa* 1 0 0 0 0 1 2 0.80
809 Iowa* 1 0 0 0 0 1 2 0.80
1001 Iowa 1 N 0 1 0 0 1 3 1.20
1004 1 1 1 0 3 3 12.5 5.00
1034 Diamond 1 1 1 0 3 2 10.5 4.20
1023 Diamond 1 1 1 1 0 2 7.25 2.90
1100 Diamond N 1 2 0 3 2 11.5 4.60
1101 Diamond N N 0 0 0 3 3 10.5 4.20
1106 1 2 0 1 2 8.5 3.40
1112 1 0 0 0 3 7 2.80
1118 1 0 0 0 0 1 2 0.80
802* Marble N 0 0 0 3 1 6.5 2.60
1123 Marble N N 0 0 0 3 3 10.5 4.20
1201 Marble N N 0 0 0 3 3 10.5 4.20
1204 Marble N 2 1 0 3 2 11.5 4.60
1206 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.40
1208 1 2 0 3 1 9.5 3.80
1214 2 2 0 1 1 7.5 3.00
1218 1 0 0 0 1 3 1.20
1220 Granite N N 1 2 0 1 2 8.5 3.40
1223 Granite N N N 0 3.00
1302 Granite N N 0 1 1 0 2 6.25 2.50
STAR Report
Page 54 of 94
1305 Granite N N 0 3.00
1310 0 0 0 2 0 3 1.20
1311 1 N 0 3.00
1314 1 1 0 3 1 8.5 3.40
1318 1 1 0 3 1 8.5 3.40
1412 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00
1313 N 0 3.00
1418 N 0 3.00
1500 N 0 3.00
1510 N 0 3.00
1512 N 0 3.00
1514 N 0 3.00
1609 1 N 0 3.00
STAR Report
Page 55 of 94
Address Corner C Trans Ramp II Ramp = CB LC JS MC JF TOTAL Rating Notes
9TH STREET
100 220th N N N 0 3.00
101 220th N N N 0 3.00
200 N 0 3.00
201 N 0 3.00
300 N 0 3.00
301 N 0 3.00
318 N 0 3.00
320 N 0 3.00
400 N 0 3.00
401 N 0 3.00
422 Emerald N N N 0 3.00
423 Emerald N N N 0 3.00
500 Emerald 1 N N N 0 3.00
501 Emerald N N N 0 3.00
504 N 0 3.00
505 N 0 3.00
508 N 0 3.00
509 1 N 0 3.00
510 N 0 3.00
511 N 0 3.00
522 Jasper N N N 0 3.00
519 Jasper 1 N 0 3.00
523 Jasper 1 N 0 3.00
600 Jasper N N N 0 3.00
601 Jasper 1 N 0 3.00
606 0 1 0 0 1 3 1.20
609 1 1 0 3 2 10.5 4.20
610 1 2 2 2 1 10.5 4.20
613 3 1 0 0 2 8 3.20
STAR Report
Page 56 of 94
614 0 1 0 2 2 8 3.20
812* Cameo N 0 1 0 0 2 5 2.00
900 Cameo N N 0 2 1 3 3 13.75 5.50
702 Cameo N 3 1 0 3 2 12.5 5.00
813* Cameo N 0 1 0 0 2 5 2.00
710 1 0 2 2 2 1 9.5 3.80
713 1 N 0 3.00
719 1 N 0 3.00
722 Ruby 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00
723 Ruby 1 N N 0 3.00
901 Ruby N 0 1 0 0 1 3 1.20
801 Ruby N N 0 3.00
802 1 0 1 0 3 3 11.5 4.60
814* Pearl 1 N 3 1 1 1 0 6.75 2.70
900 Pearl 1 1 1 1 0 2 7.25 2.90
906 Pearl 1 N N 1 1 0 0 1 4 1.60
908 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 Com Play
912 0 0 0 3 3 10.5 4.20
905* Pearl N N 1 1 1 3 3 13.75 5.50
915 1 0 1 0 0 2.25 0.90
920 1 1 0 0 1 4 1.60
820 Iowa 1 N 3 1 0 1 1 7.5 3.00
816 Iowa 1 0 0 1 0 1 3.25 1.30
812 Iowa 1 1 0 1 0 1 4.25 1.70
902 Iowa* 1 1 1 3 1 2 11.25 4.50
904 Iowa* 1 0 0 0 0 1 2 0.80
906 Iowa* 1 0 0 1 0 1 3.25 1.30
908 Iowa* 1 0 1 1 0 1 4.25 1.70
910 Iowa* 1 0 0 0 0 1 2 0.80
909 Iowa* 1 0 0 0 0 1 2 0.80
907 Iowa* 1 0 0 0 0 1 2 0.80
STAR Report
Page 57 of 94
905 Iowa* 1 0 0 0 0 1 2 0.80
903 Iowa* 1 0 0 0 0 2 4 1.60
901 Iowa 1 N N 2 1 0 3 3 13.5 5.40
821 Iowa 1 N N 0 1 1 0 2 6.25 2.50
817 Iowa* 1 0 0 1 0 0 1.25 0.50
813 Iowa* 1 0 0 0 0 1 2 0.80
811 Iowa* 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00
1014 1 2 0 0 0 0 2 0.80
1015 1 1 1 0 0 0 2 0.80
1019 1 1 1 0 0 0 2 0.80
1021 1 1 1 0 0 0 2 0.80
1023 1 1 1 1 0 0 3.25 1.30
1026 1 1 2 1 0 1 6.25 2.50
1027 Diamond 1 1 1 1 0 1 5.25 2.10
1030 Diamond 1 N N 1 3 1 3 2 13.75 5.50
813 Diamond 1 N N 1 1 1 3 2 11.75 4.70
903 Diamond 1 2 2 0 1 1 7.5 3.00
1108 0 1 1 1 0 3.75 1.50
1109 1 1 2 0 2 1 8 3.20
1110 0 1 1 0 0 2.25 0.90
1113 1 1 0 0 2 6 2.40
1114 1 1 0 3 3 12.5 5.00
1120* Marble N 1 1 0 0 2 6 2.40
1121 Marble N 1 1 0 0 1 4 1.60
815 Marble 0 0 0 0 2 4 1.60
1202 Marble 1 1 1 1 0 2 7.25 2.90
1204 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00
1206 1 0 1 3 1 8.75 3.50
1207 1 1 0 2 1 7 2.80
1211 1 3 0 3 1 10.5 4.20
1214 0 1 0 0 3 7 2.80
STAR Report
Page 58 of 94
1215 1 1 0 3 1 8.5 3.40
1219 0 0 0 3 2 8.5 3.40
1221 Granite N N 1 2 1 3 2 12.75 5.10
1222* Granite N N 1 2 0 2 3 12 4.80
1300 Granite N 1 2 0 3 3 13.5 5.40
1303* Granite N N 0 0 0 1 1 3.5 1.40
1306 1 0 0 1 0 2.5 1.00
1309 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00
1310 1 0 0 0 2 5 2.00
1312 0 0 0 0 1 2 0.80
1315 1 1 0 0 0 2 0.80
1316 1 0 0 0 1 3 1.20
1319 1 1 0 0 1 4 1.60
1321 Maple N 1 1 0 2 3 11 4.40
1322 Maple N N 1 1 0 3 1 8.5 3.40
1400 Maple N N 2 1 2 1 2 11 4.40
1401 Maple N 1 1 0 0 2 6 2.40
1403 0 1 0 1 0 2.5 1.00
1406 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00
1407 0 1 0 2 1 6 2.40
1409 0 2 0 1 0 3.5 1.40
1410 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00
1412 1 1 0 0 0 2 0.80
1413 0 1 0 3 1 7.5 3.00
1416 1 1 0 0 1 4 1.60
1417 1 1 0 1 2 7.5 3.00
1420 1 1 0 2 1 7 2.80
1421 1 1 0 1 3 9.5 3.80
1500 1 2 0 2 1 8 3.20
1501 N 0 3.00
1504 0 1 0 0 2 5 2.00
STAR Report
Page 59 of 94
Address Corner C Trans Ramp II Ramp = CB LC JS MC JF TOTAL Rating Notes
10TH STREET
100 220th N N N 0 3.00
101 220th 1 N N N 0 3.00
200 2 2 0 0 1 6 2.40
201 N 0 3.00
219 N 0 3.00
300 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00
301 1 N 0 3.00
317 1 N 0 3.00
400 1 N 0 3.00 CC
401 1 N 0 3.00
405 1 N 0 3.00
407 1 N 0 3.00
408 1 N 0 3.00
412 1 N 0 3.00
420 Emerald 1 N N N 0 3.00
421 Emerald 1 N N N 0 3.00
412 Emerald* N 0 3.00
500 Emerald N 1 1 0 0 1 4 1.60
501 Emerald 1 N 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.40
502 1 1 0 2 2 9 3.60
510 0 0 0 0 2 4 1.60
512 1 2 1 3 2 12.75 5.10
521* Jasper 1 N N 1 1 0 3 2 10.5 4.20
522* Jasper 1 N 1 1 0 1 2 7.5 3.00
600 Jasper 1 0 1 0 3 2 9.5 3.80
609* Jasper 1 0 1 1 1 0 3.75 1.50
604 2 1 0 3 1 9.5 3.80
608 1 1 0 3 1 8.5 3.40
612 1 3 0 1 2 9.5 3.80
STAR Report
Page 60 of 94
613 1 0 0 0 0 1 0.40
617 1 2 0 3 2 11.5 4.60
618 Cameo 1 0 1 0 3 2 9.5 3.80
621 Cameo 1 N 2 1 0 3 3 13.5 5.40
701* Cameo N N 1 1 0 3 1 8.5 3.40
706 Cameo 1 N 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.40
707 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00
711 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.40
714 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00
718 Ruby 1 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00
723* Ruby 1 N 0 1 1 0 1 4.25 1.70
801* Ruby 1 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00
802 Ruby 1 N 0 0 0 3 3 10.5 4.20
804 1 0 1 1 2 2 9.25 3.70
805 0 0 0 0 1 2 0.80
809 1 1 0 1 1 5.5 2.20
812 0 0 0 3 2 8.5 3.40
815 1 1 0 3 1 8.5 3.40
816 1 0 0 0 0 1 0.40
821 Pearl 1 1 0 0 1 4 1.60
1004 Pearl 1 1 1 1 0 1 5.25 2.10
901 Pearl 1 N 1 2 0 1 2 8.5 3.40
902 Pearl 1 1 1 1 1 2 8.75 3.50
919 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.40
920 1 0 1 1 0 2 6.25 2.50
922 0 1 1 0 2 6.25 2.50
923 1 1 1 0 0 1 4 1.60
926 1 1 0 2 1 7 2.80
928 1 0 0 0 0 1 2 0.80
930 1 N 0 3.00
933 Iowa 1 N N 1 1 1 1 2 8.75 3.50
STAR Report
Page 61 of 94
912 Iowa* 1 1 1 0 0 2 6 2.40
914 Iowa* 1 0 0 0 0 1 2 0.80
916 Iowa* 1 0 0 0 0 1 2 0.80
918 Iowa* 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00
1004 Iowa 1 N N 2 1 0 2 2 10 5.00
1012 Iowa* 1 0 2 0 0 2 6 2.40
1000 Iowa 1 N 0 0 0 3 3 10.5 4.20
1005 Iowa* 1 1 1 0 0 2 6 2.40
1009 Iowa* 1 0 2 0 0 1 4 1.60
921 Iowa 1 N 1 1 0 1 1 5.5 2.20
913 Iowa* 1 0 0 0 0 1 2 0.80
915 Iowa* 1 0 0 0 0 1 2 0.80
917 Iowa* 1 0 0 0 0 1 2 0.80
1011 1 1 1 0 2 2 9 3.60
1010 1 0 0 0 0 1 2 0.80
1013 1 1 1 0 0 0 2 0.80
1016 1 2 2 0 1 2 9.5 3.80
1019 1 1 0 0 0 1 3 1.20
1023 1 1 1 0 0 1 4 1.60
1030 Diamond 1 2 1 2 0 1 7.5 3.00
914 Diamond 1 1 0 2 0 1 5.5 2.20
1100 Diamond 1 3 1 1 2 2 12.25 4.90
915 Diamond N 1 1 0 2 1 7 2.80
911 Diamond* 1 0 3 0 0 0 3 1.20
1111 1 1 1 0 1 3 9.5 3.80
1113 1 0 1 0 0 2 5 2.00
1119 0 1 0 0 1 3 1.20
1121* Marble N 0 0 0 0 1 2 0.80
1122 Marble 1 N N 2 2 1 3 2 13.75 5.50
1200 Marble N N 1 2 1 2 3 13.25 5.30
1203 Marble 1 0 0 0 0 1 2 0.80
STAR Report
Page 62 of 94
1205 0 0 0 0 1 2 0.80
1206 0 1 0 0 1 3 1.20
1208 0 1 1 0 1 4.25 1.70
1211 0 1 0 0 2 5 2.00
1212 1 1 1 0 1 5.25 2.10
1213 1 2 1 0 1 6.25 2.50
1218 1 1 1 0 1 5.25 2.10
1219 1 1 0 1 3 9.5 3.80
1221* Granite N 1 2 0 1 2 8.5 3.40
1004* Granite N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00
1300* Granite N N 1 1 0 0 1 4 1.60
1303 Granite 1 3 0 3 2 12.5 5.00
1304 0 0 0 0 1 2 0.80
1307 1 3 0 3 3 14.5 5.80
1308 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00
1311 0 0 1 0 1 3.25 1.30
1314 2 1 0 2 0 6 2.40
1315 0 0 0 0 1 2 0.80
1318 1 0 1 1 2 7.75 3.10
1319 0 0 0 0 2 4 1.60
1322 Maple N 1 1 1 1 3 10.75 4.30
1323 Maple N 1 1 0 1 1 5.5 2.20
1402 Maple N 1 1 1 1 3 10.75 4.30
1403 Maple N 0 2 0 0 3 8 3.20
1405 0 0 1 0 1 3.25 1.30
1408 0 1 1 0 0 2.25 0.90
1409 1 1 0 0 2 6 2.40
1410 0 1 0 0 3 7 2.80
1412 1 1 1 1 3 10.75 4.30
1413 0 1 0 0 2 5 2.00
1416 0 1 0 0 2 5 2.00
STAR Report
Page 63 of 94
1417 0 1 0 0 2 5 2.00
1419 1 1 0 0 3 8 3.20
1423 1 1 0 0 2 6 2.40
1501 N 0 3.00
1502 N 0 2 0 0 1 4 3.80 Not Complete
1505 1 N 0 3.00
1511 N 0 3.00
1519 Lucas 1 N 0 3.00
1000 Lucas 1 N N N 0 3.00
1006 Lucas 1 N N N 0 3.00
1523 Lucas N 0 3.00
1603 N 0 3.00
1629 N 0 3.00
1631 N 0 3.00
1622 N 0 3.00
STAR Report
Page 64 of 94
Address Corner C Trans Ramp II Ramp = CB LC JS MC JF TOTAL Rating Notes
11TH STREET
1019 Emerald N N N 0 3.00
1105 Emerald N N 2 2 2 2 3 15.5 6.20
504 1 1 0 0 0 2 0.80
505 N 0 3.00
506 1 1 0 0 1 4 1.60
511 N 0 3.00
512 2 2 0 0 1 6 2.40
515 N 0 3.00
517 N 0 3.00
518 3 2 0 0 2 9 3.60
520* Jasper N N 0 1 0 0 2 5 2.00
1018 Jasper N N 1 2 0 1 3 10.5 4.20
600* Jasper N N 1 0 0 1 1 4.5 1.80
601 Jasper N N 1 3 0 1 1 7.5 3.00
605 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00
606 1 1 1 0 2 7.25 2.90
611 0 1 0 0 2 5 2.00
612 1 1 1 1 2 8.75 3.50
613 1 1 0 0 1 4 1.60
616 1 1 2 1 1 8 3.20
619 1 1 0 0 2 6 2.40
622 Cameo N N 2 3 3 3 3 19.25 7.70
1012 Cameo N N 1 3 1 2 2 12.25 4.90
700* Cameo N N 3 1 0 0 2 8 3.20
701* Cameo N 0 1 0 0 2 5 2.00
705 0 1 0 0 1 3 1.20
706 0 0 1 1 1 4.75 1.90
708 1 1 0 0 1 4 1.60
711 2 2 0 3 3 14.5 5.80
STAR Report
Page 65 of 94
712 0 0 0 2 1 5 2.00
722 Ruby N 1 1 0 3 2 10.5 4.20
723 Ruby N 1 1 0 3 3 12.5 5.00
800 Ruby N 1 1 0 1 1 5.5 2.20
801* Ruby N 1 1 0 2 3 11 4.40
804 0 1 0 2 1 6 2.40
805 1 2 0 1 1 6.5 2.60
810 1 1 0 0 2 6 2.40
811 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00
812 0 1 0 1 1 4.5 1.80
813 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.40
1012 Pearl 1 1 1 1 2 8.75 3.50
1108 Pearl N 1 2 0 3 2 11.5 4.60
900 Pearl N N 1 2 0 0 3 9 3.60
901 Pearl 1 N 0 0 1 0 2 5.25 2.10
905 0 0 0 0 2 4 1.60
906 0 2 0 0 0 2 0.80
911 1 1 0 1 2 7.5 3.00
917 1 1 0 3 2 10.5 4.20
1014 Iowa* 1 1 1 1 0 0 3.25 1.30
1016 Iowa* 0 3 0 1 2 8.5 3.40
1017 Iowa 0 0 0 0 2 4 1.60
1018 Iowa* 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0.40
1020 Iowa 0 1 0 0 3 7 2.80
1106 Iowa 3 2 1 3 2 14.75 5.90
1015 Iowa 1 1 3 1 0 0 5.25 2.10
1102 Iowa 1 1 3 1 0 0 5.25 2.10
1017 Diamond 1 1 1 0 0 1 4 1.60
1018 Diamond 1 1 0 1 0 1 4.25 1.70
1100 Diamond 0 0 0 0 1 2 0.80
1101 Diamond 1 3 0 1 2 9.5 3.80
STAR Report
Page 66 of 94
1104 1 2 0 3 3 13.5 5.40
1114 1 2 0 0 2 7 2.80
1116 0 2 0 0 2 6 2.40
1120 Marble 2 1 0 2 2 10 4.00
1123 Marble 1 2 0 2 2 10 4.00
1009 Marble* 1 0 0 0 0 1 0.40
1015 Marble 1 3 0 3 1 10.5 4.20
1200 Marble 1 1 0 1 1 5.5 2.20
1205 1 1 2 0 0 2 7 2.80
1206 1 3 0 3 2 12.5 5.00
1208 0 2 2 2 2 11.5 4.60
1213 2 1 0 0 1 5 2.00
1214 1 2 0 2 2 10 4.00
1219 2 2 1 0 2 9.25 3.70
1222* Granite N N 0 1 0 0 2 5 2.00
1223* Granite N N 0 1 0 0 2 5 2.00
1300* Granite N N 1 0 0 0 2 5 2.00
1009* Granite N N 1 1 0 0 1 4 1.60
1307 2 1 0 0 1 5 2.00
1308 1 1 0 1 2 7.5 3.00
1309 0 0 0 1 2 5.5 2.20
1310 0 1 1 2 1 7.25 2.90
1314 2 2 0 2 2 11 4.40
1315 0 0 1 0 1 3.25 1.30
1317 0 0 1 0 3 7.25 2.90
1318 0 0 1 1 0 2.75 1.10
1321 Maple N N 1 1 0 0 3 8 3.20
1322 Maple N N 0 2 0 0 2 6 2.40
1015* Maple N N 1 3 0 0 2 8 3.20
1400 Maple N N 1 1 0 2 2 9 3.60
1406 0 1 0 0 2 5 2.00
STAR Report
Page 67 of 94
1407 N 0 3.00
1408 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.40
1410 1 2 0 1 1 6.5 2.60
1411 1 0 0 0 1 3 1.20
1412 1 1 0 0 2 6 2.40
1414 2 1 0 1 3 10.5 4.20
1415 N 0 3.00
1417 N 0 3.00
1500 N 0 3.00
STAR Report
Page 68 of 94
Address Corner C Trans Ramp II Ramp = CB LC JS MC JF TOTAL Rating Notes
12TH STREET
100 N 0 3.00 Fr Grnds
101 N 1 1 1 0 2 7.25 4.45 Museum
200 Gaukel N 0 3.00 Fr Grnds
203 Gaukel 0 1 0 0 1 3 1.20 Vets
217 Gaukel 1 2 1 0 2 8.25 3.30 Pool
218 Guakel N 0 3.00
300 N 0 3.00 G. Park
305 1 1 0 1 2 7.5 3.00 Shelter W
305 2 1 0 2 2 10 4.00 Shelter E
321 1 1 1 0 2 7.25 2.90 CC Park
322 N 0 3.00 G. Park
400 N 0 3.00
401 1 2 0 0 2 7 2.80 CC P-Lot
409 0 1 0 0 2 5 2.00
410 N 0 3.00
417 1 2 0 0 2 7 2.80
418 N 0 3.00
1112* Emerald N 1 1 0 0 2 6 2.40
1202 Emerald N N N 0 3.00
1208 Emerald* N 0 3.00
1205 Emerald N N 0 3.00
503 Emerald N 0 1 1 1 2 7.75 3.10
506 N 0 3.00
507 1 2 0 1 1 6.5 2.60
508 N
509 0 2 0 2 2 9 3.60
512 N 0 3.00
514 0 1 0 1 2 6.5 2.60
515 N 0 3.00
STAR Report
Page 69 of 94
519 0 2 0 2 2 9 3.60
522* Jasper N 0 1 1 3 2 10.75 4.30
523 Jasper N 0 1 0 2 1 6 2.40
600* Jasper N 0 0 0 2 1 5 2.00
601 Jasper N 1 3 0 2 2 11 4.40
607 3 2 0 1 2 10.5 4.20
610 0 0 0 3 3 10.5 4.20
611 0 2 0 2 3 11 4.40
612 1 1 0 2 2 9 3.60
614 0 1 0 0 1 3 1.20
615 1 2 0 1 1 6.5 2.60
616 0 1 1 0 2 6.25 2.50
619 3 2 0 0 1 7 2.80
1112 Cameo 0 2 0 3 3 12.5 5.00
1204 Cameo 0 1 0 3 3 11.5 4.60
1115 Cameo N 0 0 0 0 2 4 1.60
1201 Cameo N N N 0 3.00 Liberty
709 2 1 0 2 1 8 3.20
713 1 1 0 1 1 5.5 2.20
715 1 0 0 0 2 5 2.00
717 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00
721 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00
721 Ruby 1 N 0 0 1 0 1 3.25 1.30
722 Ruby N N N 0 3.00 Liberty
800 Ruby N N N 0 3.00
801* Ruby N 2 3 0 2 3 14 5.60
804 1 1 0 0 2 6 2.40
807 0 1 0 3 1 7.5 3.00
808 1 2 0 1 1 6.5 2.60
809 0 0 0 0 1 2 0.80
812 0 1 0 0 2 5 2.00
STAR Report
Page 70 of 94
817 0 2 0 3 2 10.5 4.20
818 0 1 0 0 1 3 1.20
1112 Pearl* 0 0 0 0 2 4 1.60
1116 Pearl N 3 1 0 1 1 7.5 3.00
1204 Pearl N 1 2 0 1 2 8.5 3.40
1205* Pearl N 0 1 0 0 1 3 1.20
901* Pearl N 2 0 0 0 2 6 2.40
904 0 1 0 0 1 3 1.20
905 2 2 1 2 1 10.25 4.10
908 N 0 3.00
915 1 1 0 0 3 8 3.20
919 0 1 0 0 1 3 1.20
1114 Iowa* 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00
1118 Iowa 1 1 0 3 1 8.5 3.40
1202* Iowa N 1 1 0 0 0 2 0.80
1206 Iowa* 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.40
1201 Iowa N 1 1 1 0 2 7.25 2.90 Chrch Lot
1001 Iowa N 1 1 0 0 2 6 2.40 Fiesta Lot
1012 1 2 0 0 2 7 2.80
1015 0 1 0 0 2 5 2.00
1020 Diamond 1 1 0 2 3 11 4.40
1112 Diamond 1 3 0 1 2 9.5 3.80
1115 Diamond N 0 2 0 1 2 7.5 3.00
1100 Diamond 1 1 0 0 1 4 1.60
1105 2 1 1 0 1 6.25 2.50
1106 1 0 0 0 1 3 1.20
1110 1 0 0 0 0 1 0.40
1112 0 2 0 0 1 4 1.60
1113 1 2 1 0 2 8.25 3.30
1117 0 1 0 0 2 5 2.00
1120 0 2 0 0 1 4 1.60
STAR Report
Page 71 of 94
1114 Marble 1 2 2 3 1 12 4.80
1122 Marble 0 1 0 0 2 5 2.00
1115 Marble 1 1 0 2 2 9 3.60
1200 Marble 0 2 0 0 2 6 2.40
1206 0 1 0 1 2 6.5 2.60
1207 0 1 0 0 1 3 1.20
1209 0 2 0 0 1 4 1.60
1210 1 1 0 2 2 9 3.60
1212 1 1 0 0 0 2 0.80
1215 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00
1216 1 3 0 2 3 13 5.20
1217 0 1 0 0 1 3 1.20
1220* Granite N N 0 0 0 2 1 5 2.00
1221* Granite N N 0 0 1 0 2 5.25 2.10
1301* Granite N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00
1302* Granite N 1 1 0 0 1 4 1.60
1304 1 2 0 0 3 9 3.60
1305 1 0 0 0 1 3 1.20
1309 0 0 0 0 1 2 0.80
1312 1 1 0 2 1 7 2.80
1315 0 0 0 0 1 2 0.80
1317 2 0 0 3 1 8.5 3.40
1318 1 1 0 0 2 6 2.40
1322 Maple N N 1 2 0 1 3 10.5 4.20
1323 Maple N N 1 2 0 1 2 8.5 3.40
1115* Maple N N 1 2 0 1 1 6.5 2.60
1402 Maple N N 2 1 0 0 3 9 3.60
1409 N 0 3.00
1410 0 0 0 1 1 3.5 1.40
1412 1 1 0 0 1 4 1.60
1413 N 0 3.00
STAR Report
Page 72 of 94
1417 N 0 3.00
1418 13th Pl N N N 0 3.00
1423 13th Pl N 0 3.00
1501 13th Pl N 0 3.00
1506 13th Pl N N N 0 3.00
1507 N 0 3.00
1512 N 0 3.00
STAR_Report_FINAL
STAR_Report_FINAL
STAR_Report_FINAL
STAR_Report_FINAL
STAR_Report_FINAL
STAR_Report_FINAL
STAR_Report_FINAL
STAR_Report_FINAL
STAR_Report_FINAL
STAR_Report_FINAL
STAR_Report_FINAL
STAR_Report_FINAL
STAR_Report_FINAL
STAR_Report_FINAL
STAR_Report_FINAL
STAR_Report_FINAL
STAR_Report_FINAL
STAR_Report_FINAL
STAR_Report_FINAL
STAR_Report_FINAL
STAR_Report_FINAL
STAR_Report_FINAL

Contenu connexe

Tendances

Organic Urbanism: human-oriented design for metropolises
Organic Urbanism: human-oriented design for metropolisesOrganic Urbanism: human-oriented design for metropolises
Organic Urbanism: human-oriented design for metropolisesOleksandr Galychyn
 
Crosswalks For Walkable Communities
Crosswalks For Walkable CommunitiesCrosswalks For Walkable Communities
Crosswalks For Walkable CommunitiesCarmanah Traffic
 
Summit Parkline Presentation to City Council
Summit Parkline Presentation to City CouncilSummit Parkline Presentation to City Council
Summit Parkline Presentation to City CouncilGabriela Kappes
 
Land Use & Transport Planning_Istanbul IETT Workshop 4_15 June 2015
Land Use & Transport Planning_Istanbul IETT Workshop 4_15 June 2015Land Use & Transport Planning_Istanbul IETT Workshop 4_15 June 2015
Land Use & Transport Planning_Istanbul IETT Workshop 4_15 June 2015VTPI
 
@ UDRI - Traffic & Transportation Plan - Final
@ UDRI - Traffic & Transportation Plan - Final@ UDRI - Traffic & Transportation Plan - Final
@ UDRI - Traffic & Transportation Plan - FinalAltamash Khan
 
Workshop Innovation in Africa - Manifesto for BRT Lite
Workshop Innovation in Africa - Manifesto for BRT LiteWorkshop Innovation in Africa - Manifesto for BRT Lite
Workshop Innovation in Africa - Manifesto for BRT LiteBRTCoE
 
San Francisco Mobility Access and Pricing Study: Study Findings and Public Fe...
San Francisco Mobility Access and Pricing Study: Study Findings and Public Fe...San Francisco Mobility Access and Pricing Study: Study Findings and Public Fe...
San Francisco Mobility Access and Pricing Study: Study Findings and Public Fe...SanFranciscoTA
 
FINAL_Hammons_CRNRA_ScholarReport
FINAL_Hammons_CRNRA_ScholarReportFINAL_Hammons_CRNRA_ScholarReport
FINAL_Hammons_CRNRA_ScholarReportHagen Hammons
 
Public Vs Private Transportation Systems
Public Vs Private Transportation SystemsPublic Vs Private Transportation Systems
Public Vs Private Transportation Systemssdeep20
 
Rick Hall: Place & Mobility
Rick Hall: Place & MobilityRick Hall: Place & Mobility
Rick Hall: Place & Mobilityguest7106fd
 
Bus Rapid Transit (BRT)
Bus Rapid Transit (BRT)Bus Rapid Transit (BRT)
Bus Rapid Transit (BRT)alirazmpa
 
Pollution, congestion and transport planning in urban areas
Pollution, congestion and transport planning in urban areasPollution, congestion and transport planning in urban areas
Pollution, congestion and transport planning in urban areasMarcelo Felipozzi
 
Developing a Regional Bike Sharing Program
Developing a Regional Bike Sharing ProgramDeveloping a Regional Bike Sharing Program
Developing a Regional Bike Sharing ProgramHarvard Campus Services
 
Harvard Transportation Case Study: Developing a Regional Bike Sharing Program
Harvard Transportation Case Study: Developing a Regional Bike Sharing ProgramHarvard Transportation Case Study: Developing a Regional Bike Sharing Program
Harvard Transportation Case Study: Developing a Regional Bike Sharing ProgramHarvard Campus Services
 
Traffic at urban road junctions
Traffic at urban road junctionsTraffic at urban road junctions
Traffic at urban road junctionsDasun_Ransiri
 

Tendances (20)

Organic Urbanism: human-oriented design for metropolises
Organic Urbanism: human-oriented design for metropolisesOrganic Urbanism: human-oriented design for metropolises
Organic Urbanism: human-oriented design for metropolises
 
SMART Plan DTPW Corridor Estimates
SMART Plan DTPW Corridor EstimatesSMART Plan DTPW Corridor Estimates
SMART Plan DTPW Corridor Estimates
 
Crosswalks For Walkable Communities
Crosswalks For Walkable CommunitiesCrosswalks For Walkable Communities
Crosswalks For Walkable Communities
 
Summit Parkline Presentation to City Council
Summit Parkline Presentation to City CouncilSummit Parkline Presentation to City Council
Summit Parkline Presentation to City Council
 
Land Use & Transport Planning_Istanbul IETT Workshop 4_15 June 2015
Land Use & Transport Planning_Istanbul IETT Workshop 4_15 June 2015Land Use & Transport Planning_Istanbul IETT Workshop 4_15 June 2015
Land Use & Transport Planning_Istanbul IETT Workshop 4_15 June 2015
 
@ UDRI - Traffic & Transportation Plan - Final
@ UDRI - Traffic & Transportation Plan - Final@ UDRI - Traffic & Transportation Plan - Final
@ UDRI - Traffic & Transportation Plan - Final
 
Workshop Innovation in Africa - Manifesto for BRT Lite
Workshop Innovation in Africa - Manifesto for BRT LiteWorkshop Innovation in Africa - Manifesto for BRT Lite
Workshop Innovation in Africa - Manifesto for BRT Lite
 
Sustainable Urban Mobility Planning
Sustainable Urban Mobility PlanningSustainable Urban Mobility Planning
Sustainable Urban Mobility Planning
 
Bradford tod ca gbc 20120324 v2
Bradford tod ca gbc 20120324 v2Bradford tod ca gbc 20120324 v2
Bradford tod ca gbc 20120324 v2
 
San Francisco Mobility Access and Pricing Study: Study Findings and Public Fe...
San Francisco Mobility Access and Pricing Study: Study Findings and Public Fe...San Francisco Mobility Access and Pricing Study: Study Findings and Public Fe...
San Francisco Mobility Access and Pricing Study: Study Findings and Public Fe...
 
FINAL_Hammons_CRNRA_ScholarReport
FINAL_Hammons_CRNRA_ScholarReportFINAL_Hammons_CRNRA_ScholarReport
FINAL_Hammons_CRNRA_ScholarReport
 
TOD presentation
TOD presentationTOD presentation
TOD presentation
 
Public Vs Private Transportation Systems
Public Vs Private Transportation SystemsPublic Vs Private Transportation Systems
Public Vs Private Transportation Systems
 
Rick Hall: Place & Mobility
Rick Hall: Place & MobilityRick Hall: Place & Mobility
Rick Hall: Place & Mobility
 
2016 TOD brochure
2016 TOD brochure2016 TOD brochure
2016 TOD brochure
 
Bus Rapid Transit (BRT)
Bus Rapid Transit (BRT)Bus Rapid Transit (BRT)
Bus Rapid Transit (BRT)
 
Pollution, congestion and transport planning in urban areas
Pollution, congestion and transport planning in urban areasPollution, congestion and transport planning in urban areas
Pollution, congestion and transport planning in urban areas
 
Developing a Regional Bike Sharing Program
Developing a Regional Bike Sharing ProgramDeveloping a Regional Bike Sharing Program
Developing a Regional Bike Sharing Program
 
Harvard Transportation Case Study: Developing a Regional Bike Sharing Program
Harvard Transportation Case Study: Developing a Regional Bike Sharing ProgramHarvard Transportation Case Study: Developing a Regional Bike Sharing Program
Harvard Transportation Case Study: Developing a Regional Bike Sharing Program
 
Traffic at urban road junctions
Traffic at urban road junctionsTraffic at urban road junctions
Traffic at urban road junctions
 

En vedette (15)

NarrativeEssay
NarrativeEssayNarrativeEssay
NarrativeEssay
 
Catálago-PF015-WEB
Catálago-PF015-WEBCatálago-PF015-WEB
Catálago-PF015-WEB
 
Trabajo cervantes
Trabajo cervantesTrabajo cervantes
Trabajo cervantes
 
Revisor DNA 2017
Revisor DNA 2017Revisor DNA 2017
Revisor DNA 2017
 
Aqidah ~ kreatif
Aqidah ~ kreatifAqidah ~ kreatif
Aqidah ~ kreatif
 
Miguel de cervantes
Miguel de cervantesMiguel de cervantes
Miguel de cervantes
 
8. la literatura medieval web
8. la literatura medieval web8. la literatura medieval web
8. la literatura medieval web
 
2015 aha-guidelines-highlights-portuguese
2015 aha-guidelines-highlights-portuguese2015 aha-guidelines-highlights-portuguese
2015 aha-guidelines-highlights-portuguese
 
Actividad 1
Actividad 1Actividad 1
Actividad 1
 
completed-transcript-7582784
completed-transcript-7582784completed-transcript-7582784
completed-transcript-7582784
 
La Celestina
La CelestinaLa Celestina
La Celestina
 
EGGER Stammhaus (Head Office) Case Study
EGGER Stammhaus (Head Office) Case StudyEGGER Stammhaus (Head Office) Case Study
EGGER Stammhaus (Head Office) Case Study
 
IT MATCH: contracten onderhandelen als zelfstandige / freelancer
IT MATCH: contracten onderhandelen als zelfstandige / freelancerIT MATCH: contracten onderhandelen als zelfstandige / freelancer
IT MATCH: contracten onderhandelen als zelfstandige / freelancer
 
Módulo III actividad 3
Módulo III actividad 3Módulo III actividad 3
Módulo III actividad 3
 
Denmark Country PowerPoint Presentation Content
Denmark Country PowerPoint Presentation ContentDenmark Country PowerPoint Presentation Content
Denmark Country PowerPoint Presentation Content
 

Similaire à STAR_Report_FINAL

Synthesis Paper - Sarah Hooker & Ping Na Huang - Vancouver Transportation
Synthesis Paper - Sarah Hooker & Ping Na Huang - Vancouver TransportationSynthesis Paper - Sarah Hooker & Ping Na Huang - Vancouver Transportation
Synthesis Paper - Sarah Hooker & Ping Na Huang - Vancouver TransportationSarah Mae Hooker
 
Hattiesburg final document
Hattiesburg final documentHattiesburg final document
Hattiesburg final documentDonna Lum
 
scott_shaffer_board_final
scott_shaffer_board_finalscott_shaffer_board_final
scott_shaffer_board_finalScott Shaffer
 
Center City Connector Executive Summary
Center City Connector Executive SummaryCenter City Connector Executive Summary
Center City Connector Executive SummaryZach Shaner
 
The Development of Public Transportation Strategic Plan for Metro Cebu Volume...
The Development of Public Transportation Strategic Plan for Metro Cebu Volume...The Development of Public Transportation Strategic Plan for Metro Cebu Volume...
The Development of Public Transportation Strategic Plan for Metro Cebu Volume...Emmanuel Mongaya
 
San Francisco Transportation Plan - May 30, 2013 Board Workshop Presentations
San Francisco Transportation Plan - May 30, 2013 Board Workshop PresentationsSan Francisco Transportation Plan - May 30, 2013 Board Workshop Presentations
San Francisco Transportation Plan - May 30, 2013 Board Workshop PresentationsSFCTA
 
North Oakland Community Analysis Final Report
North Oakland Community Analysis Final ReportNorth Oakland Community Analysis Final Report
North Oakland Community Analysis Final ReportSara Barz
 
2002-Youve-Got-Connections
2002-Youve-Got-Connections2002-Youve-Got-Connections
2002-Youve-Got-ConnectionsKatherine Brower
 
Rural Long Range Transportation Plan 2005 - 2030
Rural Long Range Transportation Plan 2005 - 2030Rural Long Range Transportation Plan 2005 - 2030
Rural Long Range Transportation Plan 2005 - 2030LSCOG
 
Transportation as Revitalization Strategy
Transportation as Revitalization StrategyTransportation as Revitalization Strategy
Transportation as Revitalization StrategyJohn-Mark Palacios
 
Multi-modal Final
Multi-modal FinalMulti-modal Final
Multi-modal FinalJuan Migone
 
Municipal Perspectives on Compete Streets
Municipal Perspectives on Compete StreetsMunicipal Perspectives on Compete Streets
Municipal Perspectives on Compete StreetsAngela Vincent, AICP
 
TechniCity - Assignment 1 - Project Plan
TechniCity - Assignment 1 - Project PlanTechniCity - Assignment 1 - Project Plan
TechniCity - Assignment 1 - Project PlanNicole Kusold
 

Similaire à STAR_Report_FINAL (20)

01.ENTRIPS
01.ENTRIPS01.ENTRIPS
01.ENTRIPS
 
Synthesis Paper - Sarah Hooker & Ping Na Huang - Vancouver Transportation
Synthesis Paper - Sarah Hooker & Ping Na Huang - Vancouver TransportationSynthesis Paper - Sarah Hooker & Ping Na Huang - Vancouver Transportation
Synthesis Paper - Sarah Hooker & Ping Na Huang - Vancouver Transportation
 
Hattiesburg final document
Hattiesburg final documentHattiesburg final document
Hattiesburg final document
 
scott_shaffer_board_final
scott_shaffer_board_finalscott_shaffer_board_final
scott_shaffer_board_final
 
Center City Connector Executive Summary
Center City Connector Executive SummaryCenter City Connector Executive Summary
Center City Connector Executive Summary
 
The Development of Public Transportation Strategic Plan for Metro Cebu Volume...
The Development of Public Transportation Strategic Plan for Metro Cebu Volume...The Development of Public Transportation Strategic Plan for Metro Cebu Volume...
The Development of Public Transportation Strategic Plan for Metro Cebu Volume...
 
San Francisco Transportation Plan - May 30, 2013 Board Workshop Presentations
San Francisco Transportation Plan - May 30, 2013 Board Workshop PresentationsSan Francisco Transportation Plan - May 30, 2013 Board Workshop Presentations
San Francisco Transportation Plan - May 30, 2013 Board Workshop Presentations
 
North Oakland Community Analysis Final Report
North Oakland Community Analysis Final ReportNorth Oakland Community Analysis Final Report
North Oakland Community Analysis Final Report
 
SSC2011_Barbara McCann PPT
SSC2011_Barbara McCann PPTSSC2011_Barbara McCann PPT
SSC2011_Barbara McCann PPT
 
2002-Youve-Got-Connections
2002-Youve-Got-Connections2002-Youve-Got-Connections
2002-Youve-Got-Connections
 
Rural Long Range Transportation Plan 2005 - 2030
Rural Long Range Transportation Plan 2005 - 2030Rural Long Range Transportation Plan 2005 - 2030
Rural Long Range Transportation Plan 2005 - 2030
 
Somerville Broadway Streetscape Project, CAPS comments to MassDOT, March 2011
Somerville Broadway Streetscape Project, CAPS comments to MassDOT, March 2011 Somerville Broadway Streetscape Project, CAPS comments to MassDOT, March 2011
Somerville Broadway Streetscape Project, CAPS comments to MassDOT, March 2011
 
Transportation as Revitalization Strategy
Transportation as Revitalization StrategyTransportation as Revitalization Strategy
Transportation as Revitalization Strategy
 
Multi-modal Final
Multi-modal FinalMulti-modal Final
Multi-modal Final
 
convert_255356
convert_255356convert_255356
convert_255356
 
Municipal Perspectives on Compete Streets
Municipal Perspectives on Compete StreetsMunicipal Perspectives on Compete Streets
Municipal Perspectives on Compete Streets
 
SSC2011_Wilf Sommerkorn PPT
SSC2011_Wilf Sommerkorn PPTSSC2011_Wilf Sommerkorn PPT
SSC2011_Wilf Sommerkorn PPT
 
Brian Marshall, Capital Area Transit System
Brian Marshall, Capital Area Transit SystemBrian Marshall, Capital Area Transit System
Brian Marshall, Capital Area Transit System
 
TechniCity - Assignment 1 - Project Plan
TechniCity - Assignment 1 - Project PlanTechniCity - Assignment 1 - Project Plan
TechniCity - Assignment 1 - Project Plan
 
Evaluation process and criteria june 2 2015 final
Evaluation process and criteria june 2 2015 finalEvaluation process and criteria june 2 2015 final
Evaluation process and criteria june 2 2015 final
 

Dernier

EDUROOT SME_ Performance upto March-2024.pptx
EDUROOT SME_ Performance upto March-2024.pptxEDUROOT SME_ Performance upto March-2024.pptx
EDUROOT SME_ Performance upto March-2024.pptxaaryamanorathofficia
 
Antisemitism Awareness Act: pénaliser la critique de l'Etat d'Israël
Antisemitism Awareness Act: pénaliser la critique de l'Etat d'IsraëlAntisemitism Awareness Act: pénaliser la critique de l'Etat d'Israël
Antisemitism Awareness Act: pénaliser la critique de l'Etat d'IsraëlEdouardHusson
 
PPT Item # 4 - 231 Encino Ave (Significance Only)
PPT Item # 4 - 231 Encino Ave (Significance Only)PPT Item # 4 - 231 Encino Ave (Significance Only)
PPT Item # 4 - 231 Encino Ave (Significance Only)ahcitycouncil
 
Get Premium Budhwar Peth Call Girls (8005736733) 24x7 Rate 15999 with A/c Roo...
Get Premium Budhwar Peth Call Girls (8005736733) 24x7 Rate 15999 with A/c Roo...Get Premium Budhwar Peth Call Girls (8005736733) 24x7 Rate 15999 with A/c Roo...
Get Premium Budhwar Peth Call Girls (8005736733) 24x7 Rate 15999 with A/c Roo...MOHANI PANDEY
 
Item # 4 - 231 Encino Ave (Significance Only).pdf
Item # 4 - 231 Encino Ave (Significance Only).pdfItem # 4 - 231 Encino Ave (Significance Only).pdf
Item # 4 - 231 Encino Ave (Significance Only).pdfahcitycouncil
 
The Most Attractive Pune Call Girls Handewadi Road 8250192130 Will You Miss T...
The Most Attractive Pune Call Girls Handewadi Road 8250192130 Will You Miss T...The Most Attractive Pune Call Girls Handewadi Road 8250192130 Will You Miss T...
The Most Attractive Pune Call Girls Handewadi Road 8250192130 Will You Miss T...ranjana rawat
 
Night 7k to 12k Call Girls Service In Navi Mumbai 👉 BOOK NOW 9833363713 👈 ♀️...
Night 7k to 12k  Call Girls Service In Navi Mumbai 👉 BOOK NOW 9833363713 👈 ♀️...Night 7k to 12k  Call Girls Service In Navi Mumbai 👉 BOOK NOW 9833363713 👈 ♀️...
Night 7k to 12k Call Girls Service In Navi Mumbai 👉 BOOK NOW 9833363713 👈 ♀️...aartirawatdelhi
 
Lucknow 💋 Russian Call Girls Lucknow ₹7.5k Pick Up & Drop With Cash Payment 8...
Lucknow 💋 Russian Call Girls Lucknow ₹7.5k Pick Up & Drop With Cash Payment 8...Lucknow 💋 Russian Call Girls Lucknow ₹7.5k Pick Up & Drop With Cash Payment 8...
Lucknow 💋 Russian Call Girls Lucknow ₹7.5k Pick Up & Drop With Cash Payment 8...anilsa9823
 
VIP Call Girl mohali 7001035870 Enjoy Call Girls With Our Escorts
VIP Call Girl mohali 7001035870 Enjoy Call Girls With Our EscortsVIP Call Girl mohali 7001035870 Enjoy Call Girls With Our Escorts
VIP Call Girl mohali 7001035870 Enjoy Call Girls With Our Escortssonatiwari757
 
Expressive clarity oral presentation.pptx
Expressive clarity oral presentation.pptxExpressive clarity oral presentation.pptx
Expressive clarity oral presentation.pptxtsionhagos36
 
Climate change and occupational safety and health.
Climate change and occupational safety and health.Climate change and occupational safety and health.
Climate change and occupational safety and health.Christina Parmionova
 
Akurdi ( Call Girls ) Pune 6297143586 Hot Model With Sexy Bhabi Ready For S...
Akurdi ( Call Girls ) Pune  6297143586  Hot Model With Sexy Bhabi Ready For S...Akurdi ( Call Girls ) Pune  6297143586  Hot Model With Sexy Bhabi Ready For S...
Akurdi ( Call Girls ) Pune 6297143586 Hot Model With Sexy Bhabi Ready For S...tanu pandey
 
Call Girls Nanded City Call Me 7737669865 Budget Friendly No Advance Booking
Call Girls Nanded City Call Me 7737669865 Budget Friendly No Advance BookingCall Girls Nanded City Call Me 7737669865 Budget Friendly No Advance Booking
Call Girls Nanded City Call Me 7737669865 Budget Friendly No Advance Bookingroncy bisnoi
 
Top Rated Pune Call Girls Wadgaon Sheri ⟟ 6297143586 ⟟ Call Me For Genuine S...
Top Rated  Pune Call Girls Wadgaon Sheri ⟟ 6297143586 ⟟ Call Me For Genuine S...Top Rated  Pune Call Girls Wadgaon Sheri ⟟ 6297143586 ⟟ Call Me For Genuine S...
Top Rated Pune Call Girls Wadgaon Sheri ⟟ 6297143586 ⟟ Call Me For Genuine S...Call Girls in Nagpur High Profile
 
Climate change and safety and health at work
Climate change and safety and health at workClimate change and safety and health at work
Climate change and safety and health at workChristina Parmionova
 
Artificial Intelligence in Philippine Local Governance: Challenges and Opport...
Artificial Intelligence in Philippine Local Governance: Challenges and Opport...Artificial Intelligence in Philippine Local Governance: Challenges and Opport...
Artificial Intelligence in Philippine Local Governance: Challenges and Opport...CedZabala
 
VIP Model Call Girls Kiwale ( Pune ) Call ON 8005736733 Starting From 5K to 2...
VIP Model Call Girls Kiwale ( Pune ) Call ON 8005736733 Starting From 5K to 2...VIP Model Call Girls Kiwale ( Pune ) Call ON 8005736733 Starting From 5K to 2...
VIP Model Call Girls Kiwale ( Pune ) Call ON 8005736733 Starting From 5K to 2...SUHANI PANDEY
 
The U.S. Budget and Economic Outlook (Presentation)
The U.S. Budget and Economic Outlook (Presentation)The U.S. Budget and Economic Outlook (Presentation)
The U.S. Budget and Economic Outlook (Presentation)Congressional Budget Office
 

Dernier (20)

EDUROOT SME_ Performance upto March-2024.pptx
EDUROOT SME_ Performance upto March-2024.pptxEDUROOT SME_ Performance upto March-2024.pptx
EDUROOT SME_ Performance upto March-2024.pptx
 
Antisemitism Awareness Act: pénaliser la critique de l'Etat d'Israël
Antisemitism Awareness Act: pénaliser la critique de l'Etat d'IsraëlAntisemitism Awareness Act: pénaliser la critique de l'Etat d'Israël
Antisemitism Awareness Act: pénaliser la critique de l'Etat d'Israël
 
PPT Item # 4 - 231 Encino Ave (Significance Only)
PPT Item # 4 - 231 Encino Ave (Significance Only)PPT Item # 4 - 231 Encino Ave (Significance Only)
PPT Item # 4 - 231 Encino Ave (Significance Only)
 
Get Premium Budhwar Peth Call Girls (8005736733) 24x7 Rate 15999 with A/c Roo...
Get Premium Budhwar Peth Call Girls (8005736733) 24x7 Rate 15999 with A/c Roo...Get Premium Budhwar Peth Call Girls (8005736733) 24x7 Rate 15999 with A/c Roo...
Get Premium Budhwar Peth Call Girls (8005736733) 24x7 Rate 15999 with A/c Roo...
 
Item # 4 - 231 Encino Ave (Significance Only).pdf
Item # 4 - 231 Encino Ave (Significance Only).pdfItem # 4 - 231 Encino Ave (Significance Only).pdf
Item # 4 - 231 Encino Ave (Significance Only).pdf
 
The Most Attractive Pune Call Girls Handewadi Road 8250192130 Will You Miss T...
The Most Attractive Pune Call Girls Handewadi Road 8250192130 Will You Miss T...The Most Attractive Pune Call Girls Handewadi Road 8250192130 Will You Miss T...
The Most Attractive Pune Call Girls Handewadi Road 8250192130 Will You Miss T...
 
Night 7k to 12k Call Girls Service In Navi Mumbai 👉 BOOK NOW 9833363713 👈 ♀️...
Night 7k to 12k  Call Girls Service In Navi Mumbai 👉 BOOK NOW 9833363713 👈 ♀️...Night 7k to 12k  Call Girls Service In Navi Mumbai 👉 BOOK NOW 9833363713 👈 ♀️...
Night 7k to 12k Call Girls Service In Navi Mumbai 👉 BOOK NOW 9833363713 👈 ♀️...
 
Lucknow 💋 Russian Call Girls Lucknow ₹7.5k Pick Up & Drop With Cash Payment 8...
Lucknow 💋 Russian Call Girls Lucknow ₹7.5k Pick Up & Drop With Cash Payment 8...Lucknow 💋 Russian Call Girls Lucknow ₹7.5k Pick Up & Drop With Cash Payment 8...
Lucknow 💋 Russian Call Girls Lucknow ₹7.5k Pick Up & Drop With Cash Payment 8...
 
VIP Call Girl mohali 7001035870 Enjoy Call Girls With Our Escorts
VIP Call Girl mohali 7001035870 Enjoy Call Girls With Our EscortsVIP Call Girl mohali 7001035870 Enjoy Call Girls With Our Escorts
VIP Call Girl mohali 7001035870 Enjoy Call Girls With Our Escorts
 
Expressive clarity oral presentation.pptx
Expressive clarity oral presentation.pptxExpressive clarity oral presentation.pptx
Expressive clarity oral presentation.pptx
 
Climate change and occupational safety and health.
Climate change and occupational safety and health.Climate change and occupational safety and health.
Climate change and occupational safety and health.
 
Akurdi ( Call Girls ) Pune 6297143586 Hot Model With Sexy Bhabi Ready For S...
Akurdi ( Call Girls ) Pune  6297143586  Hot Model With Sexy Bhabi Ready For S...Akurdi ( Call Girls ) Pune  6297143586  Hot Model With Sexy Bhabi Ready For S...
Akurdi ( Call Girls ) Pune 6297143586 Hot Model With Sexy Bhabi Ready For S...
 
Call Girls Nanded City Call Me 7737669865 Budget Friendly No Advance Booking
Call Girls Nanded City Call Me 7737669865 Budget Friendly No Advance BookingCall Girls Nanded City Call Me 7737669865 Budget Friendly No Advance Booking
Call Girls Nanded City Call Me 7737669865 Budget Friendly No Advance Booking
 
Top Rated Pune Call Girls Wadgaon Sheri ⟟ 6297143586 ⟟ Call Me For Genuine S...
Top Rated  Pune Call Girls Wadgaon Sheri ⟟ 6297143586 ⟟ Call Me For Genuine S...Top Rated  Pune Call Girls Wadgaon Sheri ⟟ 6297143586 ⟟ Call Me For Genuine S...
Top Rated Pune Call Girls Wadgaon Sheri ⟟ 6297143586 ⟟ Call Me For Genuine S...
 
Climate change and safety and health at work
Climate change and safety and health at workClimate change and safety and health at work
Climate change and safety and health at work
 
Artificial Intelligence in Philippine Local Governance: Challenges and Opport...
Artificial Intelligence in Philippine Local Governance: Challenges and Opport...Artificial Intelligence in Philippine Local Governance: Challenges and Opport...
Artificial Intelligence in Philippine Local Governance: Challenges and Opport...
 
Call Girls Service Connaught Place @9999965857 Delhi 🫦 No Advance VVIP 🍎 SER...
Call Girls Service Connaught Place @9999965857 Delhi 🫦 No Advance  VVIP 🍎 SER...Call Girls Service Connaught Place @9999965857 Delhi 🫦 No Advance  VVIP 🍎 SER...
Call Girls Service Connaught Place @9999965857 Delhi 🫦 No Advance VVIP 🍎 SER...
 
Rohini Sector 37 Call Girls Delhi 9999965857 @Sabina Saikh No Advance
Rohini Sector 37 Call Girls Delhi 9999965857 @Sabina Saikh No AdvanceRohini Sector 37 Call Girls Delhi 9999965857 @Sabina Saikh No Advance
Rohini Sector 37 Call Girls Delhi 9999965857 @Sabina Saikh No Advance
 
VIP Model Call Girls Kiwale ( Pune ) Call ON 8005736733 Starting From 5K to 2...
VIP Model Call Girls Kiwale ( Pune ) Call ON 8005736733 Starting From 5K to 2...VIP Model Call Girls Kiwale ( Pune ) Call ON 8005736733 Starting From 5K to 2...
VIP Model Call Girls Kiwale ( Pune ) Call ON 8005736733 Starting From 5K to 2...
 
The U.S. Budget and Economic Outlook (Presentation)
The U.S. Budget and Economic Outlook (Presentation)The U.S. Budget and Economic Outlook (Presentation)
The U.S. Budget and Economic Outlook (Presentation)
 

STAR_Report_FINAL

  • 1. SOMATIC TRANSPORTATION ASSESSMENT RECORD (STAR) REPORT CITY OF ONAWA
  • 3. STAR Report Page 2 of 94 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTIONS Background 3 STAR Report Defined 3 Residential Comments 4 Funding Opportunities 5 STAR Summary Findings 5 Opportunities 6 Repeal Chapter 136 6 Compliance with Chapter 136 6 Somatic Transportation Utility 7 Spreadsheets Data Base 8 Culmination 11 TABLES STAR Summary 5 Somatic Transportation Utility Opportunity 7 APPENDICES Appendix A: Onawa Municipal Code Chapter 136 11 Appendix B: Iowa State Code Sidewalk Plan 17 Appendix C: STAR Spreadsheets 24
  • 4. STAR Report Page 3 of 94 Background On January 27, 2015 the City of Onawa (City), Monona County, Iowa City Council applied to participate in the Community Visioning Program sponsored through Trees Forever, the Iowa Department of Transportation (IDOT), and Iowa State University (ISU). This program conducts local research to better understand what the community is in need of or wants in regards to bicycle and pedestrian transportation. The program prepares a document that demonstrates the possibilities with improved pedestrian and bicycle transportation for a community. This involved community members through a Community Visioning Steering Committee (Committee), surveys and focus groups. Further research gathered included, but was not limited to, water sheds, drainage, and local destination locations. During the Committee meetings, committee members learned almost immediately that this was not a program just about trails, but a comprehensive picture of the City’s bicycle and pedestrian transportation barriers and assets. The City has a current sidewalk ordinance, Chapter 136 (see appendix A), which covers areas such as specifications or standards, owner responsibility, debris (including grass clippings), permit requirements, and responsibility for maintenance. Chapter 136 further includes details of Council’s ability to force the construction or repair work of any sidewalk. In the late 1970s to the early 1980s the City undertook a sidewalk development or improvement project using a Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) the City received. There was still an associated cost to the City and its residents that benefitted from the improvements, even though it met with residential resistance due to their individual costs. According to current Iowa Code (see Appendix B) the City can adopt a sidewalk program that addresses issues such as maintenance, repair, replacement and installation, which could provide a sound long-term plan for the community. These plans should address the requirements for maintaining sidewalks, how and when the city will inspect sidewalks, and how the program will be funded. Such programs can be funded by the city, by property owners directly or through special assessments on the property owner’s taxes that can be repaid over a ten year payback. STAR Report Defined Due to the above facts gathered regarding current Iowa Code, current city ordinance, a participant in the Committee, a City public employee, and a devoted “walker”, and to find a real comprehensive approach to understanding the City’s pedestrian and bicycle transportation needs and wants; the City Administrator completed this Somatic Transportation Assessment Record (STAR) Report. The City Administrator was and is not an engineer or somatic transportation expert. This assessment began at the end of June and ran through the early days of August in 2015. The purpose behind the STAR was to ensure the City understands the current conditions of pedestrian, bicycle, or wheelchair transportation. Therefore this report will begin with the definition behind STAR from the Merriam-Webster online dictionary (http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/): • Somatic: (1) of, relating to, or affecting the body. • Transportation: the act or process of moving people or things from one place to another or a way of traveling from one place to another place. • Assessment: the act of making a judgment about something or an idea or opinion about something. • Record: is to write something down so that it can be used or seen again in the future.
  • 5. STAR Report Page 4 of 94 Hence, with the above definitions kept in mind, this report refines those to reflect the use within STAR as: • Somatic: by use of a physical motion from or affecting the body: either walking, running, or by use of a mechanical device under manual operation such as: a bicycle, stroller, walker, or wheelchair (both manual and battery operated). • Transportation: the act or process of moving individuals from one place to another by use of somatic transportation: sidewalk, trail, and/or path. • Assessment: the act of making a judgment about the condition of public somatic transportation, sidewalk, trail, and/or path. • Record: documenting the current somatic transportation, sidewalk, trail, and/or path condition for future reference, correction, and use. The above definition can be further refined to simply state the STAR Report is an assessment of somatic transportation documenting the current condition of City sidewalks, paths, and/or trails for future reference, correction, and use. Therefore, the purpose of the STAR report is to create a record of the current condition of all of the somatic transportation within the City limits that are available for public use. Within this report sidewalks, trails, and/or paths will be used interchangeably with somatic transportation and one term will reflect the others. STAR did not assess access somatic transportation to businesses, public entities, or residential properties that were attached to or adjacent to the primary somatic transportation of the property, such as the sidewalk from the curb to the public somatic transportation, from the somatic transportation to the residential front door, a business’s access sidewalk from the public sidewalk. The public portion of the sidewalk for purposes of the STAR are those portions of sidewalks intended to be used as an intermediary sidewalk for an individual to use as transportation through or to the respective property. These assessments then will become a record that is useable to the City to retain the conditions of the sidewalks and/or trails by useable spreadsheets where the data can be modified when a portion of a property’s sidewalk is improved, added to, or reconstructed in part or wholly. Residential Comments During the assessment of STAR we had the opportunity to discuss the conditions of the somatic transportation from the Community Visioning program as well as during the actual assessments. Residents understand the need for a good condition sidewalk upon their property as well as throughout the community. Many stated in retrospect that they understood their sidewalk was in ill repair and needed some attention. This would be followed up with the comment that they do not have the money to install or maintain their sidewalk. Further comments included the question of why sidewalks were needed upon their property since their neighbors across the street had a sidewalk or that people walk in the street. Although these comments are valid, walkers from the community mentioned barriers to somatic transportation and some of those comments included the condition of current sidewalks, animals “protecting their property” and sidewalks ending at property lines in the middle of the street forcing them to walk across the verge (the area between the curb and property line). The photo to the left shows a pedestrians walking on a grass filled sidewalk. Other barrier comments included vehicles parked across the sidewalk, grass clippings upon the sidewalk, and low hanging trees. The sidewalk condition comments demonstrates the need for an improved somatic transportation system within the City and a severe need for financial assistance.
  • 6. STAR Report Page 5 of 94 Funding Opportunities A number of funding opportunities are available for the City to consider a sidewalk improvement plan to address their current condition. These funding opportunities will be discussed in depth within the Community Visioning final report. Some of these grant opportunities include Community Development Block Grants (CDBG), Safe Routes to Schools, and other grants through the United States Department of Agriculture, the Iowa Economic Development Agency (IEDA) and the Iowa Department of Natural Resources (IDNR). STAR Summary Findings A review of the Iowa Code, the Community Visioning draft version and their collected data, and the STAR data collected derives the conclusion that the somatic transportation within the City needs improvement. This STAR Report can be used as a step in producing a somatic transportation plan in accordance to the Iowa Code along with the Community Visioning final product. The current City statistics cover property encompasses over five (5) square miles or just under 3,340 acres of agricultural land (approximately 1,770 acres), developable land, and pre-existing developed land; including both residential and commercial properties. The STAR Summary chart to the right represents the findings of the assessment portion of this STAR Report. Labeled within the STAR Summary Table’s first column is “Street”. Each North to South bound street is represented with the East to West streets used as connecting routes. The connecting routes from alley to the adjoining street statistics are kept with the north to south street information. From the STAR Summary Chart you can determine that within the City there are approximately STAR SUMMARY Street Prop. Com. No Trans Ramps Low High Avg 1st 33 4 18 9 0.00 5.50 2.52 2nd 75 6 29 65 0.00 5.10 2.30 3rd 91 2 0 61 0.00 5.00 2.03 4th 93 3 17 57 0.00 6.60 2.40 5th 106 0 24 73 0.00 5.80 2.59 6th 100 1 6 51 0.00 6.60 2.65 7th 73 9 14 39 0.00 5.40 2.55 8th 73 21 24 42 0.00 5.00 2.60 9th 122 43 30 53 0.00 5.50 2.50 10th 137 65 29 46 0.00 5.80 2.44 11th 100 8 9 43 0.00 7.70 2.75 12th 129 1 29 44 0.00 5.60 2.61 13th 118 5 24 46 0.00 5.40 2.77 14th 108 0 49 48 0.40 5.30 2.92 15th 116 7 69 82 0.00 5.40 2.69 16th/Sun 34 0 27 14 2.40 4.80 3.08 17th 26 1 24 12 2.40 3.00 2.95 18th 4 3 4 4 3.00 3.00 3.00 Elmwood 9 0 9 4 3.00 3.00 3.00 Kingsway 8 0 8 4 3.00 3.00 3.00 Granite 20 0 20 2 3.00 3.00 3.00 Lucas 20 0 14 14 2.40 3.30 2.99 Lucas Pl. 9 0 9 0 3.00 3.00 3.00 Pearl 12 4 12 14 3.00 3.00 3.00 N. Iowa 11 11 11 12 3.00 3.00 3.00 S. Iowa 13 11 13 8 3.00 3.00 3.00 E. Iowa 13 10 13 6 3.00 3.00 3.00
  • 7. STAR Report Page 6 of 94 1,650 mixed use properties (“Prop.” column), varying in size and dimensions, of which over 200 properties are commercially (“Com.” Column) related and/or zoned; not including agricultural parcels. Under the “No Trans” column represents that 541 properties in the City do not have any somatic form of transportation; which is nearly one-third of all city properties. The “Ramps” column represent how many American with Disabilities Act ramps are needed within the City. This act was adopted by the United States Federal Government on July 26, 1990; a total of 853 ramps are needed. The next three columns are representative of the low, high and average along a north to south streets. Ratings on the spreadsheets are further explained in the Spreadsheets Data Base of this report. For brevity, the low and high are indicated by their appropriate columns, and the average is the rating of all somatic transportation along each respective street. These ratings range from 0, 1, 2, or 3. In the “High” column you will notice that the high exceeds a 3.00 in most cases. Again, this is further explained in the Spreadsheets Data Base, but it can be stated that this is due to the concept that a poorly maintained sidewalk is worse than no somatic transportation at all, and this is part of the assessment process used within this STAR Report. In review the STAR Summary Chart indicates that the City of Onawa and its somatic transportation infrastructure needs to be improved. These findings also suggest possible opportunities for the City to explore. Opportunities Grants are a viable, but limited, resource available to small rural communities including the City of Onawa. Though grants are becoming more competitive each year with limited resources from the funding agencies. However, with the limited extent of grants, it would be in the City’s best interest to pursue these grants to aid in the construction and rehabilitation of existing somatic transportation. This kept in mind there are a couple of options to repair the somatic transportation system within the City and they include: repeal the code, require compliance, or create a utility to assume all responsibility for the maintenance of the City’s somatic transportation infrastructure. REPEAL CHAPTER 136 Although it may be the easiest decision to remove the requirement of sidewalks with the repeal of the Onawa Municipal Code Chapter 136 entitled “Sidewalks”, it can also have long term drastic effects against the community’s ability to grow, thrive, and prosper. This could include, but is not limited to, businesses not locating in the City, businesses leaving the community, a future potential resident choosing not to relocate within the City of Onawa due to the lack of recreational (somatic transportation) opportunities, etc. By removing the sidewalk requirement, no business or resident would have the financial impact of having to install or maintain the somatic form of transportation. This means that businesses would no longer have to a sidewalk leading to their front door, pedestrians would have to walk through grass, weeds, gravel, or dirt to get to the store they need or want to shop at. Though this opportunity is the least amount of a financial impact to the City and its residents, it is only first to be discussed and carries the most potential harmful impacts to the City and its future. Although, the City Council should consult with the City Attorney to ensure this is a viable option. COMPLIANCE WITH CHAPTER 136 This opportunity would actually cost the City the most with limited financial resources and multiple hours of staff time to enforce, due to the current condition of the City’s somatic transportation. The financial resources would be used by the City Attorney’s office to cite those property owners not in compliance, time spent on the phone with those cited and possible court time and expenses. This expense would be shared with other City staff
  • 8. STAR Report Page 7 of 94 members due to their time investment with paperwork, phone conversations with property owners in an attempt to get their property in compliance, and court appearances. This is also the most detrimental to owners of property that are at an intersection, as they do not have to install or maintain a sidewalk for 66 feet. Corner property owners have to install and maintain a sidewalk for at least 198 feet (66 feet of the main street frontage, plus 124 feet side street frontage and half of the alley way), plus two ramp installation for the curb transition of the sidewalk to the street. These increased expenses for a corner lot make this an unfair disadvantage for nearly one-third (1/3) of the City’s residents. This opportunity to fix the somatic transportation to come into compliance with the current code would be the most time consuming and expensive to the residents and City funds. SOMATIC TRANSPORTATION UTILITY The best opportunity for the City is to consider a Somatic Transportation Utility (STU), based on the assessment portion of this report with the current sidewalk conditions. This is further based upon the City’s resident’s random comments regarding the cost of maintaining and/or repairing their individual sidewalks: “it is unaffordable”. The table to the right depicts possible revenue generation to reconstruct or to maintain current somatic transportation within the City limits. The “Utility” column depicts the possible amount the certain street would fund towards a formation of a STU to care for the City’s somatic transportation. This is an annual amount, with the total at the bottom of the column and is based on each property paying a monthly base utility fee of $3.00 (although this is an arbitrary number). Under the “Cons. Fees” are an additional amount for property owners that currently do not have a form of somatic transportation, or sidewalk, as required by the current code. This amount is four (4) times the cost of the STU’s base fee; whatever that fee Council would establish, but the total in the table to the right is again based on $3.00 per monthly fee; $12.00 in total for a currently non-compliant sidewalk. It will not cover the entire cost of the construction or reconstruction of somatic transportation, but is paid over a ten (10) year period and can be used to match any and all grants obtained for somatic transportation. Once the ten (10) years have expired their rate would decrease to the established base utility fee at that time. Pooling these resources is an opportunity to repair and improve the City’s current somatic transportation Somatic Transportation Utility Opportunity Street Utility Cons. Fees Cons. Costs 1st $ 1,332.00 $ 2,160.00 $ 40,000.00 2nd $ 2,916.00 $ 864.00 $ 54,400.00 3rd $ 3,348.00 $ 1,836.00 $ 70,600.00 4th $ 3,456.00 $ 4,428.00 $ 111,100.00 5th $ 3,816.00 $ 5,400.00 $ 136,600.00 6th $ 3,636.00 $ 4,752.00 $ 116,800.00 7th $ 2,952.00 $ 4,428.00 $ 101,200.00 8th $ 3,384.00 $ 4,644.00 $ 104,000.00 9th $ 5,940.00 $ 6,912.00 $ 150,800.00 10th $ 7,272.00 $ 7,128.00 $ 150,900.00 11th $ 3,888.00 $ 5,076.00 $ 117,100.00 12th $ 4,680.00 $ 7,128.00 $ 149,700.00 13th $ 4,428.00 $ 7,128.00 $ 152,400.00 14th $ 3,888.00 $ 8,856.00 $ 178,100.00 15th $ 4,428.00 $ 9,072.00 $ 196,800.00 16th/Sun $ 1,224.00 $ 3,240.00 $ 60,600.00 17th $ 972.00 $ 2,592.00 $ 48,000.00 18th $ 252.00 $ 432.00 $ 9,200.00 Elmwood $ 324.00 $ 972.00 $ 17,700.00 Kingsway $ 288.00 $ 864.00 $ 16,000.00 Granite $ 720.00 $ 2,160.00 $ 35,200.00 Lucas $ 720.00 $ 1,944.00 $ 40,200.00 Lucas Pl. $ 324.00 $ 864.00 $ 13,600.00 Pearl $ 576.00 $ 1,296.00 $ 28,800.00 N. Iowa $ 792.00 $ 1,188.00 $ 25,900.00 S. Iowa $ 864.00 $ 1,404.00 $ 26,900.00 E. Iowa $ 828.00 $ 1,404.00 $ 25,700.00 $ 67,248.00 $98,172.00 $2,178,300.00
  • 9. STAR Report Page 8 of 94 that is fair to all residents and a benefit to all; property owners, tenants, and visitors. The final column, “Cons. Costs” is the estimated total investment for current properties within the City to meet the City’s current code for the sidewalk requirement. Any property with a “Total” score of 2.8 or more, or with any category in the assessment rated at a “3” should be required to bring their assessment to a reasonable score of a “0” or “1”, or the property owner should agree to the ten (10) year “Cons. Fee”. The construction fee recommendation is due to the fairness and equity, unless Council believes that it is acceptable for those residents who have not maintained their sidewalks should pay the same rate as those residents who have maintained their property’s sidewalk. Once all required properties have a form of somatic transportation, new construction or repaired, the STU fund total could be used to maintain the sidewalk and create a bicycle/trail system throughout the City after the ten (10) year pay back. New construction on private property should still be required to install somatic transportation during the development stages of any vertical structural improvement on the property. After the installation of the sidewalk according to the current code, the STU would then retain all maintenance, repair, and reconstruction of the newly installed somatic transportation. This maintenance can and should be contracted out to local contractors as much as possible. At no time should the utility funds be used to construct a new somatic transportation upon a property that is or has been developed; that should be the property owner’s responsibility. A recommended exception to this rule may be that of any public benefit of trails, paths, or any form of somatic transportation to a destination site: such as Gramm Wetlands, Blue Lake, or other possible destinations yet to be determined. If the decision of the Council is to create a STU, it is the recommendation that a further study be conducted to establish a fair rate to cover the known and possibly discover some unforeseen issues and costs. The STAR report was not created to form a utility, but instead to assess the existing somatic transportation’s condition, offer a record to maintain the data on the existing infrastructure, and present some opportunities. Again, the estimated costs were derived from the assessment completed through the end of June through the beginning of August 2015 and individually can be reviewed through the generated record or spreadsheets in Appendix C. Spreadsheets Data Base As mentioned previously, the assessment of the somatic transportation capability within the City is documented using spreadsheets (see Appendix C) that shall be retained by the City for future reference and updating when a sidewalk is improved. The condition of existing PCC concrete sidewalks are assessed based upon five types of deterioration. Each sidewalk is given a rating based on the severity of deficiency. These ratings are based on property frontage of each individually owned lot in the City, whether the lot has 66 feet of frontage or more along a street or streets: such as a corner lot. Streets were assessed along the major portion of a street, that major portion in the City of Onawa are north and south directional streets that are numbered for the most part. The east to west directional streets are included with the north and south directional street assessments from the alley to the intersection. Streets that have a limited number of properties, residential or commercial, may be combined with other street assessments within the spreadsheet data base. Defining the data base is essential to ensure the understanding and future use of the assessed information and the information provided on each individual spreadsheet is appropriately utilized for years to come. Further the explanation includes how points were assessed under each category to reach the total impact on somatic transportation. Some assessed categories carry a different weight than others due to the impact severity to somatic transportation. When applicable, a photo will precede the definition for each column within the Somatic Transportation Spreadsheets description supplied here below.
  • 10. STAR Report Page 9 of 94 Address: Each assessed property has an address whether there is a building on it or not. If there is no known address, one is assigned the vacant lot for purposes of this report and should be amended as an appropriate address is assigned to the lot due to the construction of a new building upon the lot. Addresses were obtained from the Monona County, Iowa Assessor’s Geographical Information System (GIS) website (https://mononaia.mygisonline.com/). An address followed by a small star (*) indicates a corner lot that has some form of somatic transportation along one street but not the other street. Corner: Corner or intersecting street name; if there is a star (*) after the intersecting street name the property is along the side or adjoining street between the main street and the alley or approximately where an alley should be located. C: Commercial property: if a number “1” appears in this column it signifies that the property assessed is a commercial property. This is done for informational purposes at the time of the STAR report, but can be used for future reference if the City decides to establish a Somatic Transportation Utility and if the City would implement a higher fee for commercial properties. Trans: If there is no sidewalk or somatic transportation this will show an "N"; as depicted in the photo to the left Ramp II: If a corner of the intersecting street has a ramp that runs perpendicular, or down to the intersection named street, this column will have a “Y” or it will have an “N” if it does not have a ramp. An “N/A” is an indication of a continuing street. A continuing street means that one side of the street an intersecting street where the other side continues without a street; otherwise known as a “T” intersection. Ramp =: If a corner of the intersecting street has a ramp that runs parallel or along the named street on the spreadsheet, this column will have a “Y” or it will have an “N” if it does not have a ramp. An “N/A” is an indication of a continuing street. A continuing street means that one side of the street an intersecting street where the other side continues without a street; otherwise known as a “T” intersection. CB: Corner Break: [1] one or more corner cracks in a sidewalk with minimum impact to somatic transportation; [2] one (1) or more severe cracks that could impact somatic transportation significantly or more than six (6) cracks of category [1]; [3] one (1) or more severe cracks located in a property’s sidewalk that prevents somatic transportation or more than three [2] rating or more than twelve (12) cracks of no to slight impact to somatic transportation. This category is weighted at 1.0 times per assessed point.
  • 11. STAR Report Page 10 of 94 LC:Line Cracking (Long. & Trans.): [1] one or more linear cracks in a sidewalk with minimum impact to somatic transportation; [2] one (1) or more severe cracks that could impact somatic transportation significantly or more than six (6) cracks of category [1]; [3] one (1) or more severe cracks located in a panel that prevents somatic transportation or more than three [2] rating or more than twelve (12) cracks of no to slight impact to somatic transportation. This category is weighted at 1.0 times per assessed point. JS: Joint Spalling: [1] one or more cracks along the edges of a sidewalk with minimum impact to somatic transportation; [2] one (1) or more severe cracks that could impact somatic transportation significantly or more than six (6) cracks of category [1]; [3] one (1) or more severe cracks located in a panel that prevents somatic transportation or more than three [2] rating or more than twelve (12) cracks of no to slight impact to somatic transportation. This category is weighted at 1.25 times per assessed point. MC: Map Cracking: [1] one or more map cracks in a sidewalk with minimum impact to somatic transportation or minor surface damage to the concrete; [2] one (1) or more severe cracks that could impact somatic transportation significantly or more than six (6) map cracking of category [1], or significant surface damage; [3] one (1) or more severe cracks located in a panel that prevents somatic transportation or more than three [2] rating, or more than twelve (12) cracks of no to slight impact to somatic transportation, or multiple surface damage preventing or severely inhibiting somatic transportation. This category is weighted at 1.5 times per assessed point. JF: Joint Faulting: [1] one or more lifting action of a panel (one panel is higher or lower than an adjoining panel) with minimum impact to somatic transportation, or weeds have grown in between two panels, or panels are greater than ADA maximum distance between panels of 0.25 of an inch; [2] one (1) or more severe cracks that could impact somatic transportation significantly or more than six (6) joint faults of category [1]; [3] one (1) or more severe joint faults that prevent somatic transportation or more than three [2] rating or more than twelve (12) cracks of no to slight impact to somatic transportation. This category is weighted at 2.0 times per assessed point. TOTAL: Total weighted assessed point value for a property’s somatic transportation including the categories of Corner Break (CB), Line Cracking (LC), Joint Spalling (JS), Map Cracking (MC), and Joint Fault (JF). Rating: Severity of sidewalk distress: A rating of [0-1.5] indicates that the sidewalk is absent of distress and does not need to be replaced: [1] = low severity and should last at least ten (10) or more years, [1.5-2.8] equals moderate severity and should be planned to be replaced in the
  • 12. STAR Report Page 11 of 94 next five (5) to ten (10) years, and [2.8 or greater] means there is either no existing form of somatic transportation or a high severity of distress and should be replaced as soon as possible. This rating is based on the "TOTAL" assessed values divided by the five (5) added categories with a ranking from 0.00 or higher. This demonstrates that a higher number than three (3) and the existing concrete is more detrimental to somatic transportation than if there was no sidewalk at all. Notes: Notes are used either to aid in the assessment to ensure the property was connected to the correct address within the spreadsheet. This area could also be used to document other items of interest or for future use. For the purpose of this written report the following columns are not included in the body of the report, but are available with the City provided spreadsheets, as these were used for a possible solution of an STU and are based on a potential fee and therefore the figures are not fixed: Install: This is the estimated cost to install a new sidewalk upon a property for a 66’ frontage along the named street. This is for a four feet by four feet panel at four inches thick and includes the removal of an existing sidewalk. Deduct: The deduction column deducts $350.00 from the $2,000.00 for properties that do not currently have a sidewalk in disrepair under the “Install” column, it is the deduction that represents the increase in cost if a sidewalk needs to be removed prior to installation of a new sidewalk. Total: This is the total of the Install column minus the Deduct column totals. Fee: This column includes the extra fee for a property that needs to replace, repair or the new construction of a sidewalk. This is the cost the property owner would reimburse the City to replace the sidewalk over a period of ten (10) years that would be included in a monthly payment plan, that is if the City decides to pursue the improvement of the property owners responsibility of sidewalk maintenance by the creation of a STU. Culmination The Community Visioning program enhanced and addressed assets and barriers to the somatic transportation within the City of Onawa. This STAR Report was completed based on the concerns of sidewalk conditions expressed by residents of the City throughout the Community Visioning study. This was a comprehensive study assessing all pedestrian and bicycle transportation and storm water that could impede all somatic transportation. Therefore, to really be an entirely comprehensive study, this STAR Report was completed to aid in the Community Visioning study and to help the City Council form a positive direction on what to do for its citizens and its future. The City Council has three options to consider: repeal the sidewalk ordinance, enforce the current sidewalk ordinance, or form a somatic transportation utility. If the second option is adopted, then the City Council should consider the completion of a sidewalk plan according to the Iowa Code, which could be the most expensive solution to the City and its residents. If the City adopts the third option, then a further study should be completed prior to the implementation of the utility to ensure the correct base fee amount is established and how to collect the Somatic Transportation Utility fee on the properties within the City’s limits. The last opportunity is the middle ground in expense, development, and improvement and will be more expensive to some residents, but it is possibly the most fair to the entire City’s resident’s base.
  • 13. STAR Report Page 12 of 94 If the second or third option is selected to pursue for the City’s future, this STAR Report will enhance either program as the spreadsheets will aid City staff in the maintenance and installation of sidewalk or replacements if needed. Therefore, the last two options should consider the adoption of the STAR Report to enhance and target the beginning and continuance of somatic transportation within the City by use of the STAR Report’s spreadsheet information. Both the second and third opportunity are aided by the adoption and implementation of the spreadsheet use to target where to begin with somatic transportation improvement. Either opportunity should also include a plan as outlined from the Iowa League of Cities and the Iowa Code. The STAR Report enhances the plan and is a good starting point for the development and direction of a plan.
  • 15. STAR Report Page 14 of 94 Appendix A: Onawa Municipal Code Chapter 136
  • 16. STAR Report Page 15 of 94 CHAPTER 136 SIDEWALK REGULATIONS 136.01 Purpose 136.11 Interference with Sidewalk Improvements 136.02 Definitions 136.12 Awnings 136.03 Removal of Snow, Ice, and Accumulations 136.13 Encroaching Steps 136.04 Responsibility for Maintenance 136.14 Openings and Enclosures 136.05 City May Order Repairs 136.15 Fires or Fuel on Sidewalks 136.06 Sidewalk Construction Ordered 136.16 Defacing 136.07 Permit Required 136.17 Debris on Sidewalks 136.08 Sidewalk Standards 136.18 Merchandise Display 136.09 Barricades and Warning Lights 136.19 Sales Stands 136.10 Failure to Repair or Barricade 136.20 Water Spouts 136.01 PURPOSE. The purpose of this chapter is to enhance safe passage by citizens on sidewalks, to place the responsibility for the maintenance, repair, replacement, or reconstruction of sidewalks upon the abutting property owner and to minimize the liability of the City. 136.02 DEFINITIONS. For use in this chapter the following terms are defined: 1. “Broom finish” means a sidewalk finish that is made by sweeping the sidewalk when it is hardening. 2. “Defective sidewalk” means any public sidewalk exhibiting one or more of the following characteristics: A. Vertical separations equal to three-fourths (¾) inch or more. B. Horizontal separations equal to one (1) inch or more. C. Holes or depressions equal to three-fourths (¾) inch or more and at least four (4) inches in diameter. D. Spalling over fifty percent (50%) of a single square of the sidewalk with one or more depressions equal to one-half (½) inch or more. E. Spalling over less than fifty percent (50%) of a single square of the sidewalk with one or more depressions equal to three-fourths (¾) inch or more. F. A single square of sidewalk cracked in such a manner that no part thereof has a piece greater than one square foot. G. A sidewalk with any part thereof missing to the full depth.
  • 17. STAR Report Page 16 of 94 H. A change from the design or construction grade equal to or greater than three-fourths (¾) inch per foot. 3. “Established grade” means that grade established by the City for the particular area in which a sidewalk is to be constructed. 4. “One-course construction” means that the full thickness of the concrete is placed at one time, using the same mixture throughout. 5. “Owner” means the person owning the fee title to property abutting any sidewalk and includes any contract purchaser for purposes of notification required herein. For all other purposes, “owner” includes the lessee, if any. 6. “Portland cement” means any type of cement except bituminous cement. 7. “Sidewalk” means all permanent public walks in business, residential or suburban areas. 8. “Sidewalk improvements” means the construction, reconstruction, repair, replacement, or removal, of a public sidewalk and/or the excavating, filling or depositing of material in the public right-of-way in connection therewith. 9. “Wood float finish” means a sidewalk finish that is made by smoothing the surface of the sidewalk with a wooden trowel. 136.03 REMOVAL OF SNOW, ICE, AND ACCUMULATIONS. It is the responsibility of the abutting property owners to remove snow, ice, and accumulations promptly from sidewalks. If a property owner does not remove snow, ice, or accumulations within a reasonable time, the City may do so and assess the costs against the property owner for collection in the same manner as a property tax. (Code of Iowa, Sec. 364.12[2b & e]) 136.04 RESPONSIBILITY FOR MAINTENANCE. It is the responsibility of the abutting property owners to repair, replace or reconstruct, or cause to be repaired, replaced or reconstructed, all broken or defective sidewalks and to maintain in a safe and hazard-free condition any sidewalk outside the lot and property lines and inside the curb lines or traveled portion of the public street. (Code of Iowa, Sec. 364.12[2c]) 136.05 CITY MAY ORDER REPAIRS. If the abutting property owner does not maintain sidewalks as required, the Council may serve notice on such owner, by certified mail, requiring the owner to repair, replace or reconstruct sidewalks within a reasonable time and if such action is not completed within the time stated in the notice, the Council may require the work to be done and assess the costs against the abutting property for collection in the same manner as a property tax. (Code of Iowa, Sec. 364.12[2d & e]) 136.06 SIDEWALK CONSTRUCTION ORDERED. The Council may order the construction of permanent sidewalks upon any street or court in the City and may specially assess the cost of such improvement to abutting property owners in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 384 of the Code of Iowa. (Code of Iowa, Sec. 384.38) 136.07 PERMIT REQUIRED. No person shall remove, reconstruct, or install a sidewalk unless such person has obtained a permit from the City and has agreed in writing that said removal, reconstruction, or installation will comply with all ordinances and requirements of the City for such work. The permit will include any special allowances, such as location or grade variances, and the permittee will be furnished with a copy of the City’s sidewalk regulations.
  • 18. STAR Report Page 17 of 94 136.08 SIDEWALK STANDARDS. Sidewalks repaired, replaced, or constructed under the provisions of this chapter shall be of the following construction and meet the following standards: 1. Cement. Portland cement shall be the only cement used in the construction and repair of sidewalks. 2. Construction. Sidewalks shall be of one-course construction. 3. Sidewalk Base. Concrete may be placed directly on compact and well-drained soil. Where soil is not well drained, a three-inch sub-base of compact, clean, coarse gravel or sand shall be laid. The adequacy of the soil drainage is to be determined by the City. 4. Sidewalk Bed. The sidewalk bed shall be so graded that the constructed sidewalk will be at established grade. 5. Length, Width and Depth. Length, width and depth requirements are as follows: A. Residential sidewalks shall be at least four (4) feet wide and four (4) inches thick, and each section shall be no more than four (4) feet in length. B. Business District sidewalks shall extend from the property line to the curb. Each section shall be four (4) inches thick and no more than six (6) feet in length. C. Driveway areas shall be not less than six (6) inches in thickness. 6. Location. When a residential sidewalk is constructed, it shall be located so that there is a distance of one foot between the property line and the sidewalk unless a different location is approved by the inspector in the sidewalk construction permit. No sidewalk shall be repaired, replaced or reconstructed so as to change the location of the sidewalk unless such change is similarly approved by the inspector. 7. Grade. Curb tops shall be on level with the centerline of the street, which is the established grade. 8. Elevations. The street edge of a sidewalk shall be at an elevation even with the curb at the curb or not less than one-half (½) inch above the curb for each foot between the curb and the sidewalk. 9. Abutting Sidewalks. If either end of a sidewalk abuts on an existing sidewalk, it shall be constructed, replaced, or reconstructed so as to meet the grade of the abutting sidewalk and the standards set out in subsections 6, 7, and 8 of this section may be modified to the minimum extent necessary to meet the grade of the abutting sidewalk. 10. Exceptions to Grade Requirements. If the designated inspector finds that, owing to special conditions, a literal enforcement of the provisions of subsections 6, 7, and 8 of this section will result in unnecessary hardship, the inspector may, in specific cases, authorize such variance from the provisions of said subsections as is necessary to avoid such unnecessary hardship. 11. Slope. All sidewalks shall slope one-quarter (¼) inch per foot toward the curb. 12. Finish. All sidewalks shall be finished with a “broom” or “wood float” finish. 13. Curb Ramps and Sloped Areas for Persons with Disabilities. If a street, road, or highway is newly built or reconstructed, a curb ramp or sloped area shall be constructed or installed at each intersection of the street, road, or highway with a sidewalk or path. If a sidewalk or path is
  • 19. STAR Report Page 18 of 94 newly built or reconstructed, a curb ramp or sloped area shall be constructed or installed at each intersection of the sidewalk or path with a street, highway, or road. Curb ramps and sloped areas that are required pursuant to this subsection shall be constructed or installed in compliance with applicable Federal requirements adopted in accordance with the Federal Americans with Disabilities Act, including (but not limited to) the guidelines issued by the Federal Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board. (Code of Iowa, Sec. 216C.9) 136.09 BARRICADES AND WARNING LIGHTS. Whenever any material of any kind is deposited on any street, avenue, highway, passageway or alley when sidewalk improvements are being made or when any sidewalk is in a dangerous condition, it shall be the duty of all persons having an interest therein, either as the contractor or the owner, agent, or lessee of the property in front of or along which such material may be deposited, or such dangerous condition exists, to put in conspicuous places at each end of such sidewalk and at each end of any pile of material deposited in the street, a sufficient number of approved warning lights or flares, and to keep them lighted during the entire night and to erect sufficient barricades both at night and in the daytime to secure the same. The party or parties using the street for any of the purposes specified in this chapter shall be liable for all injuries or damage to persons or property arising from any wrongful act or negligence of the party or parties, or their agents or employees or for any misuse of the privileges conferred by this chapter or of any failure to comply with provisions hereof. 136.10 FAILURE TO REPAIR OR BARRICADE. It is the duty of the owner of the property abutting the sidewalk, or the owner’s contractor or agent, to notify the City immediately in the event of failure or inability to make necessary sidewalk improvements or to install or erect necessary barricades as required by this chapter. 136.11 INTERFERENCE WITH SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS. No person shall knowingly or willfully drive any vehicle upon any portion of any sidewalk or approach thereto while in the process of being improved or upon any portion of any completed sidewalk or approach thereto, or shall remove or destroy any part or all of any sidewalk or approach thereto, or shall remove, destroy, mar or deface any sidewalk at any time or destroy, mar, remove or deface any notice provided by this chapter. 136.12 AWNINGS. It is unlawful for a person to erect or maintain any awning over any sidewalk unless all parts of the awning are elevated at least eight (8) feet above the surface of the sidewalk and the roof or covering is made of duck, canvas or other suitable material supported by iron frames or brackets securely fastened to the building, without any posts or other device that will obstruct the sidewalk or hinder or interfere with the free passage of pedestrians. 136.13 ENCROACHING STEPS. It is unlawful for a person to erect or maintain any stairs or steps to any building upon any part of any sidewalk without permission by resolution of the Council. 136.14 OPENINGS AND ENCLOSURES. It is unlawful for a person to: 1. Stairs and Railings. Construct or build a stairway or passageway to any cellar or basement by occupying any part of the sidewalk, or to enclose any portion of a sidewalk with a railing without permission by resolution of the Council.
  • 20. STAR Report Page 19 of 94 2. Openings. Keep open any cellar door, grating, or cover to any vault on any sidewalk except while in actual use with adequate guards to protect the public. 3. Protect Openings. Neglect to properly protect or barricade all openings on or within six (6) feet of any sidewalk. 136.15 FIRES OR FUEL ON SIDEWALKS. It is unlawful for a person to make a fire of any kind on any sidewalk or to place or allow any fuel to remain upon any sidewalk. 136.16 DEFACING. It is unlawful for a person to scatter or place any paste, paint, or writing on any sidewalk. (Code of Iowa, Sec. 716.1) 136.17 DEBRIS ON SIDEWALKS. It is unlawful for a person to throw or deposit on any sidewalk any glass, nails, glass bottle, tacks, wire, cans, trash, garbage, rubbish, litter, offal, or any other debris, or any substance likely to injure any person, animal, or vehicle. (Code of Iowa, Sec. 364.12[2]) 136.18 MERCHANDISE DISPLAY. It is unlawful for a person to place upon or above any sidewalk, any goods or merchandise for sale or for display in such a manner as to interfere with the free and uninterrupted passage of pedestrians on the sidewalk; in no case shall more than three (3) feet of the sidewalk next to the building be occupied for such purposes. 136.19 SALES STANDS. It is unlawful for a person to erect or keep any vending machine or stand for the sale of fruit, vegetables or other substances or commodities on any sidewalk without first obtaining a written permit from the Council. 136.20 WATER SPOUTS. It is unlawful to cause or permit any water spout, trough, gutter or balcony extending from any building (owned or leased) to discharge or conduct water upon the surface of any public sidewalk.
  • 21. STAR Report Page 20 of 94 Appendix B: Iowa League of Cities and the Iowa Code
  • 22. STAR Report Page 21 of 94 Iowa League of Cities Zoning & Building Right of Way Responsibilities Web Exclusive June 2014 Cities are responsible for maintaining most of the public property in the community, including the city streets. However, there are some questions regarding who is responsible for other parts of the public right of way (ROW), such as sidewalks and alleys. City officials should have a good understanding of who is responsible for maintaining the right of way so they can effectively plan for future improvements. As detailed in Code of Iowa Section 364.12, cities are responsible for keeping all public grounds “in repair, and free of nuisance." This includes streets, sidewalks, alleys, bridges and a number of other public properties. However, the law does provide some exceptions and places specific responsibilities on abutting property owners. Sidewalk Maintenance Requirements and Responsibilities The Code allows cities to enact ordinances that require abutting property owners to maintain and repair sidewalks (this is often detailed in a city’s nuisance ordinance). Approving a sidewalk program that addresses issues such as maintenance, repair, replacement and installation can provide a sound long-term plan for citizens, council members and city employees. These plans should address the requirements for maintaining sidewalks, how and when the city will inspect sidewalks, and how the program will be funded. Such programs can be funded by the city, by property owners directly or through special assessments on the property owner’s taxes. Cities often use a combination of these sources to fund sidewalk programs. Cities also have the authority to approve ordinances that require the installation of sidewalks following proper notice. This is typically done to address areas of the city that do not have a sidewalk or where new construction occurs. Removal of Snow and Ice from Sidewalks Code of Iowa Section 364.12(2)(b) places the onus of removing natural accumulations of snow and ice from sidewalks on the abutting property owners. The law states that this must be done within a reasonable time and that property owners may be liable for damages caused by the failure to, “use reasonable care in the removal of the snow or ice.” Most city ordinances contain these provisions and provide definition on what is considered reasonable (such as clearing sidewalks within 48 or 72 hours).Many city ordinances also address the issue of a property owner failing to remove snow and ice in the prescribed timeframe. In these situations, the city may perform the necessary work and assess the cost to the property owner in the same manner as a property tax. The Code states that the city's general duty does not include the removal of natural accumulations of snow and ice from sidewalks. However, when the city is the abutting property owner, it must remove the snow and ice accumulations as any other abutting property owner. Maintaining Other Parts of the ROW According to Code Section 364.12(2)(c), cities are permitted to require property owners to maintain the ROW. The law specifically says this can include the area between the street and sidewalk. City councils should approve an ordinance that details this requirement and give the city the authority to enforce its provisions. Typically, such an ordinance requires the property owner to keep the sidewalk and ROW safe and in a hazard-free condition, which includes mowing the area between the street and sidewalk. In addition, cities can require property owners to maintain trees that are in the ROW, including trimming trees when necessary and clearing any debris. However, property owners cannot be required to remove diseased trees or dead
  • 23. STAR Report Page 22 of 94 wood from publicly owned property or the ROW. Most cities find that existing trees located in the city ROW are an annual financial burden. For this reason, many cities have decided to adopt a tree ordinance that specifically prohibits planting trees in the ROW, thus limiting future liabilities. Funding ROW Maintenance Cities have several options for funding ROW maintenance and repair projects. Obviously, cities can use the general fund to pay for such costs. They can also use Road Use Tax funds if the work to be done is part of the platted street system. Local Option Sales Tax funds can be used if the revenue purpose statement allows for such use. The city can sell bonds or agree to a loan to raise money. Finally, the city can assess abutting property owners to help pay for the improvements. IOWA CODE The entire Chapter 364 of the Iowa Code has not been included within this appendix, but codes that could be referenced in regards to somatic transportation and reference for this report. 364.12 RESPONSIBILITY FOR PUBLIC PLACES. 1. As used in this section, "property owner" means the contract purchaser if there is one of record, otherwise the record holder of legal title. 2. A city shall keep all public grounds, streets, sidewalks, alleys, bridges, culverts, overpasses, underpasses, grade crossing separations and approaches, public ways, squares, and commons open, in repair, and free from nuisance, with the following exceptions: a. Public ways and grounds may be temporarily closed by resolution. Following notice as provided in section 362.3, public ways and grounds may be vacated by ordinance. b. The abutting property owner is responsible for the removal of the natural accumulations of snow and ice from the sidewalks within a reasonable amount of time and may be liable for damages caused by the failure of the abutting property owner to use reasonable care in the removal of the snow or ice. If damages are to be awarded under this section against the abutting property owner, the claimant has the burden of proving the amount of the damages. To authorize recovery of more than a nominal amount, facts must exist and be shown by the evidence which afford a reasonable basis for measuring the amount of the claimant's actual damages, and the amount of actual damages shall not be determined by speculation, conjecture, or surmise. All legal or equitable defenses are available to the abutting property owner in an action brought pursuant to this paragraph. The city's general duty under this subsection does not include a duty to remove natural accumulations of snow or ice from the sidewalks. However, when the city is the abutting property owner it has the specific duty of the abutting property owner set forth in this paragraph. c. The abutting property owner may be required by ordinance to maintain all property outside the lot and property lines and inside the curb lines upon the public streets, except that the property owner shall not be required to remove diseased trees or dead wood on the publicly owned property or right-of-way. d. A city may serve notice on the abutting property owner, by certified mail to the property owner as shown by the records of the county auditor, requiring the abutting property owner to repair, replace, or reconstruct sidewalks.
  • 24. STAR Report Page 23 of 94 e. If the abutting property owner does not perform an action required under this subsection within a reasonable time, a city may perform the required action and assess the costs against the abutting property for collection in the same manner as a property tax. This power does not relieve the abutting property owner of liability imposed under paragraph "b". f. A city has no duty under this subsection with respect to property that is required by law to be maintained by a railway company. 3. A city may: a. Require the abatement of a nuisance, public or private, in any reasonable manner. b. Require the removal of diseased trees or dead wood, except as stated in subsection 2, paragraph "c" of this section. c. Require the removal, repair, or dismantling of a dangerous building or structure. d. Require the numbering of buildings. e. Require connection to public drainage systems from abutting property when necessary for public health or safety. f. Require connection to public sewer systems from abutting property, and require installation of sanitary toilet facilities and removal of other toilet facilities on such property. g. Require the cutting or destruction of weeds or other growth which constitutes a health, safety, or fire hazard. h. If the property owner does not perform an action required under this subsection within a reasonable time after notice, a city may perform the required action and assess the costs against the property for collection in the same manner as a property tax. Notice may be in the form of an ordinance or by certified mail to the property owner as shown by the records of the county auditor, and shall state the time within which action is required. However, in an emergency a city may perform any action which may be required under this section without prior notice, and assess the costs as provided in this subsection, after notice to the property owner and hearing. 4. In addition to any other remedy provided by law, a city may also seek reimbursement for costs incurred in performing any act authorized by this section by a civil action for damages against a property owner. However, a city shall not seek reimbursement for costs incurred in performing an act if the same act has not been performed by the city on adjoining city-owned property. For the purposes of this subsection, a county acquiring property for delinquent taxes shall not be considered a property owner. 5. A city may cause, without prior determination and notice, the repair or replacement of public improvements including, but not limited to, sidewalks, water stop boxes, and driveway approaches if the property owner does all of the following: a. Requests the repair and replacement of the public improvements specified in this subsection abutting the property owner's property located outside the lot and property lines and inside the curb lines. b. Waives the requirement of a prior finding by the city council that the condition of the public improvements constitutes a nuisance and the requirement of prior notice. c. Consents to the repair of the public improvements and the assessment of the cost of the repair to the abutting property. 6. If, in repairing and replacing improvements in the area between the lot or property lines and the curb lines pursuant to subsection 5, it becomes necessary for the city to repair or replace adjacent improvements in the area, the cost of repairing or replacing the adjacent public improvements may be assessed, with consent of the property owner, against the property which the public improvements abut. 7. A city may accumulate individual assessments for the repair and replacement of sidewalks, driveway approaches, water stop boxes, or similar improvements or for the abatement of nuisances, and may periodically certify the assessments to the county treasurer under one or more assessment schedules.
  • 25. STAR Report Page 24 of 94 364.13 INSTALLMENTS. If any amount assessed against property under section 364.12 will exceed one hundred dollars, a city may permit the assessment to be paid in up to ten annual installments, in the same manner and with the same interest rates provided for assessments against benefited property under chapter 384, division IV. 364.13A SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS -- LIEN AND PRECEDENCE. A special assessment levied pursuant to section 364.11 or 364.12, including all interest, is a lien against the benefited property from the date of filing the schedule of assessments until the assessment is paid. Special assessments have equal precedence with ordinary taxes and are not divested by judicial sale. 364.14 PERSONAL INJURIES. When action is brought against a city for personal injuries alleged to have been caused by its negligence, the city may notify in writing any person by whose negligence it claims the injury was caused. The notice shall state the pendency of the action, the name of the plaintiff, the name and location of the court where the action is pending, a brief statement of the alleged facts from which the cause arose, that the city believes that the person notified is liable to it for any judgment rendered against the city, and asking the person to appear and defend. A judgment obtained in the suit is conclusive in any action by the city against any person so notified, as to the existence of the defect or other cause of the injury or damage, as to the liability of the city to the plaintiff in the first named action, and as to the amount of the damage or injury. A city may maintain an action against the person notified to recover the amount of the judgment together with all the expenses incurred by the city in the suit. 364.18 FEDERAL AID. Subject to applicable state or federal regulations in effect at the time of the city action, a city may accept contributions, grants, or other financial assistance from the state or federal government. Upon a finding of public purpose, the city may disburse the assistance to any person to be used for economic development projects, including but not limited to the purchase or improvement of land and buildings for residential, commercial, or industrial use. 364.22 MUNICIPAL INFRACTIONS. 1. a. A municipal infraction is a civil offense punishable by a civil penalty of not more than seven hundred fifty dollars for each violation or if the infraction is a repeat offense, a civil penalty not to exceed one thousand dollars for each repeat offense. However, notwithstanding section 364.3, a municipal infraction arising from noncompliance with a pretreatment standard or requirement, referred to in 40 C.F.R. § 403.8, by an industrial user may be punishable by a civil penalty of not more than one thousand dollars for each day a violation exists or continues. b. (1) A city may classify a municipal infraction, other than a violation arising from noncompliance with a pretreatment standard or requirement, as an environmental violation if the infraction is a violation of chapter 455B or 459, subchapters II and III, or a violation of a standard established by the city in consultation with the department of natural resources, or both. The discharge of airborne residue from grain, created by the handling, drying, or storing of grain by a person, shall not be subject to an ordinance, the violation of which is classified as an environmental violation, unless the person is engaged in industrial production or manufacturing of grain products. The discharge of airborne residue from grain, created by the handling, drying, or storing of grain by a person engaged in industrial production or manufacturing of grain products, shall not be subject to an
  • 26. STAR Report Page 25 of 94 ordinance, the violation of which is classified as an environmental violation, if the discharge occurs from September 15 to January 15. A municipal infraction which is classified an environmental violation is punishable by a civil penalty of not more than one thousand dollars for each occurrence. A person committing an environmental violation is not subject to a civil penalty, if all of the following conditions are satisfied: (a) The violation results solely from the person conducting an initial start-up, cleaning, repairing, performing scheduled maintenance, testing, or conducting a shutdown, of either equipment causing the violation or the equipment designed to reduce or eliminate the violation. (b) The person notifies the city of the violation within twenty-four hours from the time that the violation begins. (c) The violation does not continue in existence for more than eight hours. (2) A city shall not enforce this section against a person committing an environmental violation, until the city offers to participate in informal negotiations with the person. If the person accepts the offer, the city and the person shall participate in good faith negotiations to resolve issues alleged to be the basis for the violation. 2. A city by ordinance may provide that a violation of an ordinance is a municipal infraction. 3. A city shall not provide that a violation of an ordinance is a municipal infraction if the violation is a felony, an aggravated misdemeanor, or a serious misdemeanor under state law or if the violation is a simple misdemeanor under chapters 687 through 747. 4. An officer authorized by a city to enforce a city code or regulation may issue a civil citation to a person who commits a municipal infraction. A copy of the citation may be served by personal service as provided in rule of civil procedure 1.305, by certified mail addressed to the defendant at the defendant's last known mailing address, return receipt requested, or by publication in the manner as provided in rule of civil procedure 1.310 and subject to the conditions of rule of civil procedure 1.311. A copy of the citation shall be retained by the issuing officer, and the original citation shall be sent to the clerk of the district court. The citation shall serve as notification that a civil offense has been committed and shall contain the following information: a. The name and address of the defendant. b. The name or description of the infraction attested to by the officer issuing the citation. c. The location and time of the infraction. d. The amount of civil penalty to be assessed or the alternate relief sought, or both. e. The manner, location, and time in which the penalty may be paid. f. The time and place of court appearance. g. The penalty for failure to appear in court. 5. In municipal infraction proceedings: a. The matter shall be tried before a magistrate, a district associate judge, or a district judge in the same manner as a small claim. The matter shall only be tried before a judge in district court if the total amount of civil penalties assessed exceeds the jurisdictional amount for small claims set forth in section 631.1. b. The city has the burden of proof that the municipal infraction occurred and that the defendant committed the infraction. The proof shall be by clear, satisfactory, and convincing evidence. c. The court shall ensure that the defendant has received a copy of the charges and that the defendant understands the charges. The defendant may question all witnesses who appear for the city and produce evidence or witnesses on the defendant's behalf. d. The defendant may be represented by counsel of the defendant's own selection and at the defendant's own expense.
  • 27. STAR Report Page 26 of 94 e. The defendant may answer by admitting or denying the infraction. f. If a municipal infraction is proven the court shall enter a judgment against the defendant. If the infraction is not proven, the court shall dismiss it. 6. All penalties or forfeitures collected by the court for municipal infractions shall be remitted to the city in the same manner as fines and forfeitures are remitted for criminal violations under section 602.8106. If the person named in the citation is served as provided in this section and fails without good cause to appear in response to the civil citation, judgment shall be entered against the person cited. 7. A person against whom judgment is entered, shall pay court costs and fees as in small claims under chapter 631. If the action is dismissed, the city is liable for the court costs and court fees. Where the action is disposed of without payment, or provision for assessment, of court costs, the clerk shall at once enter judgment for costs against the city. 8. Seeking a civil penalty as authorized in this section does not preclude a city from seeking alternative relief from the court in the same action. 9. a. When judgment has been entered against a defendant, the court may do any of the following: (1) Impose a civil penalty by entry of a personal judgment against the defendant. (2) Direct that payment of the civil penalty be suspended or deferred under conditions imposed by the court. (3) Grant appropriate alternative relief ordering the defendant to abate or cease the violation. (4) Authorize the city to abate or correct the violation. (5) Order that the city's costs for abatement or correction of the violation be entered as a personal judgment against the defendant or assessed against the property where the violation occurred, or both. b. If a defendant willfully violates the terms of an order imposed by the court, the failure is contempt. c. A magistrate or district associate judge shall have jurisdiction to assess or enter judgment for costs of abatement or correction in an amount not to exceed the jurisdictional amount for a money judgment in a civil action pursuant to section 631.1, subsection 1, for magistrates and section 602.6306, subsection 2, for district associate judges. If the city seeks abatement or correction costs in excess of those amounts, and the matter is not before a judge in district court, the case shall be referred to the district court for hearing and entry of an appropriate order. The procedure for hearing in the district court shall be the same procedure as that for a small claims appeal pursuant to section 631.13. 10. The defendant or the city may file a motion for a new trial or may appeal the decision of a magistrate, district associate judge, or a district judge to the district court. The procedure on appeal shall be the same as for a small claim pursuant to section 631.13. A factual determination made by the trial court, supported by substantial evidence as shown in the record, is binding for purposes of appeal relating to the violation at issue, but shall not be admissible or binding as to any future violation for the same or similar ordinance provision by the same defendant. 11. This section does not preclude a peace officer of a city from issuing a criminal citation for a violation of a city code or regulation if criminal penalties are also provided for the violation. Each day that a violation occurs or is permitted to exist by the defendant, constitutes a separate offense. 12. The issuance of a civil citation for a municipal infraction or the ensuing court proceedings do not provide an action for false arrest, false imprisonment, or malicious prosecution. 13. An action brought pursuant to this section for a municipal infraction which is an environmental violation does not preclude, and is in addition to, any other enforcement action which may be brought pursuant to chapter 455B, 455D, 455E, or 459, subchapters II, III, and VI. 14. A police department may dispose of personal property under section 80.39.
  • 29. STAR Report Page 28 of 94 Appendix C: STAR Spreadsheets
  • 30. STAR Report Page 29 of 94 Address Corner C Trans Ramp II Ramp = CB LC JS MC JF TOTAL Rating Notes 1ST STREET 700 N 0 3.00 710 N 0 3.00 120 Ruby N 0 3.00 800 Ruby N 0 3.00 801* Pearl N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 103 Pearl N 0 3.00 916 Iowa 1 N 0 3.00 100 Iowa* 1 N N N 0 3.00 103* Iowa 1 0 1 0 2 1 6 2.40 105 Iowa* N 0 3.00 1004 0 1 0 0 1 3 1.20 100 Diamond N 0 1 0 0 1 3 1.20 1001 Diamond N 0 3.00 1107 Diamond N 0 3.00 1102* Diamond N N 0 1 0 0 1 3 1.20 1106 1 1 0 1 1 5.5 2.20 1108 1 1 0 0 3 8 3.20 1112 1 1 0 3 1 8.5 3.40 1122* Marble N N 2 2 0 3 2 12.5 5.50 1200 Marble N 0 3.00 1201 N N 0 1 0 0 2 5 4.00 1204 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 1210 0 1 0 0 2 5 2.00 1214 1 1 0 0 1 4 1.60 1221* Granite 1 0 0 0 1 3 1.20 103* Granite 1 0 0 0 1 3 1.20 220 Granite* 1 N 0 3.00 1301 Granite N 0 3.00 1306 0 1 0 0 2 5 2.00
  • 31. STAR Report Page 30 of 94 1312 1 1 0 2 1 7 2.80 1318* Maple N 0 0 0 0 0 0 3.00 1400 Maple N 0 3.00 1401 N 0 3.00
  • 32. STAR Report Page 31 of 94 Address Corner C Trans Ramp II Ramp = CB LC JS MC JF TOTAL Rating Notes 2ND STREET 500 Emerald N N 0 3.00 501 Emerald N N 0 3.00 506 N 0 3.00 510 N 0 3.00 516 N 0 3.00 520 Jasper N N N 0 3.00 523 Jasper N N N 0 3.00 600 Jasper N N N 0 3.00 601 Jasper N N N 0 3.00 612 N 0 3.00 612 N 0 3.00 204 Cameo N N N 0 3.00 623 Cameo N N N 0 3.00 702 Cameo N N N 0 3.00 703 Cameo N N N 0 3.00 706 N 0 3.00 714 N 0 3.00 715 N 0 3.00 718 N 0 3.00 719 Ruby N N N 0 3.00 722 Ruby N N N 0 3.00 801* Ruby 1 N 0 1 0 0 1 3 1.20 812 Ruby N N 0 0 0 0 1 2 0.80 816 0 0 0 0 1 2 0.80 821 Pearl 1 N N 0 1 0 0 2 5 2.00 822* Pearl N N 1 1 0 1 3 9.5 3.80 901 Pearl N N N 0 3.00 902 Pearl N 2 1 0 2 2 10 4.00 905 N 0 3.00
  • 33. STAR Report Page 32 of 94 908 1 1 0 2 2 9 3.60 909 N 0 3.00 910 0 0 0 1 1 3.5 1.40 913 N 0 3.00 914 1 1 0 1 2 7.5 3.00 120 Iowa 1 N 1 1 0 1 2 7.5 3.00 112 Iowa* N 0 3.00 202 Iowa 1 N 1 1 0 0 2 6 2.40 206 Iowa* 0 2 0 0 3 8 3.20 119 Iowa 1 N N 0 3.00 201 Iowa 1 N 2 0 1 0 1 5.25 2.10 1008 1 1 0 0 2 6 2.40 1012 1 1 0 2 2 9 3.60 1017 Diamond N N 3 2 1 3 1 12.75 5.10 1018* Diamond N 1 1 0 3 3 12.5 5.00 1101* Diamond N N 0 0 0 0 2 4 1.60 1104* Diamond N N 1 0 0 1 3 8.5 3.40 1107 1 1 0 1 2 7.5 3.00 1111 1 1 0 2 0 5 2.00 1112 0 0 0 0 1 2 0.80 1114 0 0 0 0 1 2 0.80 1115 2 1 1 0 1 6.25 2.50 1117 1 1 0 3 0 6.5 2.60 1120 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 1123* Marble N N 2 1 1 1 0 5.75 2.30 202* Marble N N 1 1 0 0 0 2 0.80 1201* Marble N N 0 3 0 0 3 9 3.60 1207 0 1 0 0 1 3 1.20 1209 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 1212 0 0 0 0 1 2 0.80 1215 0 1 0 0 1 3 1.20
  • 34. STAR Report Page 33 of 94 1220 Granite N N 0 1 0 0 1 3 1.20 1223* Granite N N 0 0 0 0 3 6 2.40 207* Granite N N 2 1 0 0 1 5 2.00 105* Granite N N 0 0 0 0 3 6 2.40 1301* 0 1 1 3 1 8.75 3.50 1308 1 1 1 0 1 5.25 2.10 1315 0 1 0 0 2 5 2.00 1319 0 1 0 1 1 4.5 1.80 1321 Maple N N 1 1 0 0 1 4 1.60 204 Maple N N 1 0 0 1 3 8.5 3.40 203 Maple N N 0 1 0 0 1 3 1.20 1408 0 1 0 0 1 3 1.20 1410 1 1 0 0 1 4 1.60 1411 Maple N N N 0 3.00 1417 N 0 3.00
  • 35. STAR Report Page 34 of 94 Address Corner C Trans Ramp II Ramp = CB LC JS MC JF TOTAL Rating Notes 3RD STREET 500* Emerald N 1 1 0 2 1 7 2.80 501* Emerald N N 1 1 0 0 1 4 1.60 504 0 0 0 0 2 4 1.60 507 1 1 0 1 3 9.5 3.80 510 0 1 0 1 0 2.5 1.00 513 1 1 1 1 0 4.75 1.90 514 0 0 0 0 2 4 1.60 518 0 0 0 0 1 2 0.80 519* Jasper N N 0 0 0 0 1 2 0.80 308* Jasper N N 1 1 0 0 1 4 1.60 600 Jasper N N 2 1 1 3 1 10.75 4.30 603* Jasper N N 0 0 1 0 2 5.25 2.10 609 0 0 0 0 2 4 1.60 613 1 1 0 0 0 2 0.80 210* Cameo N N 0 0 0 0 1 2 0.80 700 Cameo 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 701* Cameo N N 2 1 0 2 1 8 3.20 709 0 1 0 0 2 5 2.00 715 1 2 0 0 1 5 2.00 717 0 0 0 0 2 4 1.60 721* Ruby N N 0 0 0 0 1 2 0.80 750 Ruby 1 1 1 0 0 3.25 1.30 801* Ruby N 0 1 0 3 3 11.5 4.60 802 Ruby N 0 0 0 0 2 4 1.60 804 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.40 810 1 1 0 0 0 2 0.80 811 0 1 0 2 2 8 3.20 812 1 0 0 1 2 6.5 2.60 815 1 2 0 0 0 3 1.20
  • 36. STAR Report Page 35 of 94 817 1 0 0 0 1 3 1.20 818 1 1 0 0 1 4 1.60 212 Pearl N N 1 1 1 3 2 11.75 4.70 300 Pearl N N 1 1 0 0 3 8 3.20 900 Pearl N 0 1 0 3 3 11.5 4.60 901 Pearl N 1 1 0 0 1 4 1.60 902 0 3 0 0 1 5 2.00 905 2 1 0 2 0 6 2.40 911 0 0 0 0 1 2 0.80 912 0 1 0 1 1 4.5 1.80 915 1 1 0 1 2 7.5 3.00 302 Iowa 1 N N 0 0 0 0 1 2 0.80 308 Iowa* 0 1 0 2 0 4 1.60 201 Iowa 1 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 208 Iowa* 1 1 0 0 2 6 2.40 214 Iowa N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 301 Iowa N N 0 1 0 0 1 3 1.20 305 Iowa* 0 1 1 1 1 5.75 2.30 1010 0 0 0 0 3 6 2.40 1011 1 1 0 2 0 5 2.00 1014 1 1 1 0 2 7.25 2.90 1016 0 0.00 1019 1 2 0 0 1 5 2.00 1021 Diamond 1 2 0 0 1 5 2.00 300 Diamond N N 0 1 0 0 2 5 2.00 1100* Diamond N N 0 2 0 2 0 5 2.00 1103 Diamond N N 2 1 0 0 1 5 2.00 1104 0 1 0 0 2 5 2.00 1107 1 1 0 0 2 6 2.40 1109 0 1 0 0 3 7 2.80 1110 1 0 0 3 3 11.5 4.60
  • 37. STAR Report Page 36 of 94 1111 3 0 0 0 1 5 2.00 1112 1 1 0 3 2 10.5 4.20 1115 1 1 0 0 2 6 2.40 1116 2 2 0 3 2 12.5 5.00 1121* Marble N N 1 2 0 0 3 9 3.60 1122 Marble N N 1 1 0 0 2 6 2.40 1201 Marble N N 1 1 0 0 2 6 2.40 1202* Marble N N 0 1 0 0 2 5 2.00 1206 0 0 0 0 2 4 1.60 1210 0 0 0 0 1 2 0.80 1211 1 1 0 0 2 6 2.40 1214 1 0 0 2 1 6 2.40 1218 0 0 0 0 1 2 0.80 1220 Granite N N 1 1 0 0 0 2 0.80 1221 Granite N N 1 3 0 2 1 9 3.60 213* Granite N N 0 0 0 0 2 4 1.60 1304* Granite N N 0 1 0 0 1 3 1.20 1305 1 1 0 2 0 5 2.00 1308 1 1 0 0 2 6 2.40 1315 1 1 0 0 2 6 2.40 1316 0 1 0 2 2 8 3.20 1318 2 1 0 0 1 5 2.00 212* Maple N N 0 1 0 0 3 7 2.80 302 Maple N N 0 1 0 0 3 7 2.80 211 Maple N N 0 0 0 0 1 2 0.80 301 Maple N N 1 0 0 2 2 8 3.20 1405 0 0 0 0 1 2 0.80 1409 0 0 0 0 2 4 1.60 1413 0 0 1 0 0 1.25 0.50 1419 1 1 1 0 1 5.25 2.10 1424 1 1 0 3 0 6.5 2.60
  • 38. STAR Report Page 37 of 94 Address Corner C Trans Ramp II Ramp = CB LC JS MC JF TOTAL Rating Notes 4TH STREET 500* Emerald N 1 1 1 0 2 7.25 2.90 505 Emerald N N 0 3.00 506 0 1 0 0 2 5 2.00 508 0 0 0 0 1 2 0.80 511 N 0 3.00 514 N 0 3.00 515 N 0 3.00 518 N 0 3.00 523 Jasper N N N 0 3.00 524* Jasper N N 0 1 0 1 3 8.5 3.40 604 Jasper N N 0 1 0 0 2 5 2.00 606 0 3 0 2 3 12 4.80 608 1 0 0 0 0 1 0.40 611 Jasper 1 N N 0 1 1 0 3 8.25 3.30 612 2 2 0 1 1 7.5 3.00 620 Cameo N N 3 3 0 3 3 16.5 6.60 701 Cameo 0 0 1 0 0 1.25 0.50 702 Cameo N N 0 3 0 0 3 9 3.60 712 0 3 0 0 3 9 3.60 716 0 0 0 0 1 2 0.80 722 Ruby N N 0 0 0 0 3 6 2.40 315* Ruby N 0 0 0 0 1 2 0.80 723 Ruby 2 1 1 1 0 5.75 2.30 802 Ruby N 0 1 0 0 3 7 2.80 804 0 0 0 0 3 6 2.40 807 1 0 0 0 1 3 1.20 808 1 1 0 0 0 2 0.80 809 0 0 1 0 1 3.25 1.30 811 0 1 0 0 1 3 1.20
  • 39. STAR Report Page 38 of 94 814 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 816 0 1 0 1 3 8.5 3.40 308 Pearl* 0 0 0 3 1 6.5 2.60 314 Pearl 0 1 0 2 2 8 3.20 404 Pearl N N 2 1 0 1 0 4.5 1.80 900 Pearl N N 1 3 0 2 1 9 3.60 901 Pearl N N 0 2 0 0 3 8 3.20 906 0 1 0 0 1 3 1.20 907 0 2 0 0 1 4 1.60 908 2 1 0 3 2 11.5 4.60 911 0 1 0 0 2 5 2.00 914 0 1 0 1 1 4.5 1.80 915 1 1 0 1 2 7.5 3.00 314 Iowa 1 N 0 1 0 0 1 3 1.20 402 Iowa N N 0 1 0 3 2 9.5 3.80 406 Iowa 1 0 0 0 0 1 2 0.80 309 Iowa* 0 0 0 0 1 2 0.80 313 Iowa N N 1 1 0 3 3 12.5 5.00 401* Iowa N N 0 1 1 3 3 12.75 5.10 1009 0 1 0 1 1 4.5 1.80 1010 N 0 3.00 1013 1 1 0 1 1 5.5 2.20 1014 N 0 3.00 1019 1 1 0 0 1 4 1.60 312 Diamond 1 1 0 0 2 6 2.40 402* Diamond N N 1 1 0 3 2 10.5 4.20 1100 Diamond N N 0 1 0 0 1 3 1.20 1101* Diamond N N 0 1 0 1 3 8.5 3.40 1105 1 1 0 0 2 6 2.40 1106 1 1 0 0 3 8 3.20 1109 0 2 0 0 3 8 3.20
  • 40. STAR Report Page 39 of 94 1110 N 0 3.00 1112 N 0 3.00 1113 2 1 0 0 3 9 3.60 1116 N 0 3.00 1117* Marble N N 0 0 0 3 3 10.5 4.20 402 Marble N N N 0 3.00 1200* Marble N N 0 1 0 0 3 7 2.80 1201* Marble N N 1 1 0 0 1 4 1.60 1203 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.40 1204 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 1208 0 1 0 0 2 5 2.00 1209 1 1 0 0 1 4 1.60 1212 0 1 0 0 3 7 2.80 1215 0 0 0 0 3 6 2.40 1216 0 1 0 0 2 5 2.00 1221 1 0 0 0 3 7 2.80 1223 Granite N N 0 1 0 0 1 3 1.20 402 Granite N N 0 1 0 0 3 7 2.80 1301* Granite N N 0 1 0 0 1 3 1.20 1302* Granite N N 0 0 0 0 1 2 0.80 1306 0 0 0 0 1 2 0.80 1308 0 1 0 0 1 3 1.20 1312 1 1 0 0 2 6 2.40 1313 Maple N N 1 1 0 0 2 6 2.40 404 Maple N N 1 1 0 0 3 8 3.20 1401 Maple 0 0 0 0 1 2 0.80 1402* Maple 0 1 0 0 1 3 1.20 1409 N 0 3.00 1410 N 0 3.00 1414 0 0 0 0 1 2 0.80 1416 N 0 3.00
  • 41. STAR Report Page 40 of 94 1417 N 0 3.00 1420 N 0 3.00
  • 42. STAR Report Page 41 of 94 Address Corner C Trans Ramp II Ramp = CB LC JS MC JF TOTAL Rating Notes 5TH STREET 413 Emerald N N 0 3.00 508 Emerald N N 0 3.00 500 Emerald N 0 3.00 504 N 0 3.00 510 N 0 3.00 513 N 0 3.00 514 N 0 3.00 517 N 0 3.00 518 N 0 3.00 523* Jasper N N 0 1 0 1 1 4.5 1.80 502* Jasper N N 0 1 0 0 1 3 1.20 600 Jasper N N N 0 3.00 603* Jasper N N 0 0 0 0 1 2 0.80 610 0 1 0 3 2 9.5 3.80 611 0 1 0 0 3 7 2.80 614 0 1 0 0 3 7 2.80 615 0 2 0 0 3 8 3.20 618 0 1 0 0 1 3 1.20 622* Cameo N N 1 2 0 3 2 11.5 4.60 414* Cameo N N 0 1 1 3 1 8.75 3.50 415* Cameo N N 0 1 0 1 1 4.5 1.80 702* Cameo N N 1 1 0 1 2 7.5 3.00 706 N 0 3.00 707 N 0 3.00 710 1 1 0 0 0 2 0.80 711 N 0 3.00 712 N 0 3.00 713 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 714 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.40
  • 43. STAR Report Page 42 of 94 715 N 0 3.00 414* Ruby N N 0 1 0 0 1 3 1.20 502 Ruby N N N 0 3.00 800* Ruby N N 1 1 0 1 2 7.5 3.00 801 Ruby N 1 2 0 0 1 5 2.00 803 0 0 1 3 1 7.75 3.10 804 0 0 0 0 3 6 2.40 808 1 1 0 0 3 8 3.20 809 0 1 0 3 1 7.5 3.00 813 0 1 0 0 3 7 2.80 816 1 3 0 1 2 9.5 3.80 817 1 2 0 0 2 7 2.80 412 Pearl N N 0 2 0 3 2 10.5 4.20 502 Pearl N 2 2 0 3 3 14.5 5.80 900 Pearl N 0 1 0 0 2 5 2.00 901 Pearl N N 1 0 0 1 3 8.5 3.40 905 1 1 0 2 1 7 2.80 906 0 0 0 0 1 2 0.80 911 1 1 0 3 3 12.5 5.00 913 1 1 0 3 1 8.5 3.40 914 0 0 0 3 2 8.5 3.40 414 Iowa N N 1 1 0 3 1 8.5 3.40 500 Iowa N N 1 1 0 3 1 8.5 3.40 504 Iowa* 0 0 0 0 1 2 0.80 510 Iowa* 1 1 0 1 1 5.5 2.20 413 Iowa N N 1 1 0 1 2 7.5 3.00 509 Iowa* 0 1 0 0 2 5 2.00 1002 Iowa N N 1 2 0 3 2 11.5 4.60 1008 1 1 0 0 2 6 2.40 1009 0 1 0 0 1 3 1.20 1013 1 0 0 3 2 9.5 3.80
  • 44. STAR Report Page 43 of 94 1014 1 1 0 0 1 4 1.60 1019 1 2 0 2 1 8 3.20 414 Diamond N N 1 1 0 3 3 12.5 5.00 502 Diamond N N 0 1 0 1 3 8.5 3.40 1100* Diamond N N 1 0 0 2 0 4 1.60 1101* Diamond N N 2 1 0 1 1 6.5 2.60 1105 0 0 0 0 3 6 2.40 1106 0 1 0 0 2 5 2.00 1107 1 1 0 1 1 5.5 2.20 1108 0 0 0 0 1 2 0.80 1111 0 0 0 3 1 6.5 2.60 1112 1 1 0 2 3 11 4.40 1116 1 1 0 0 1 4 1.60 1117 0 3 0 0 2 7 2.80 412* Marble N N 0 0 0 0 2 4 1.60 1122 Marble N N 1 1 0 1 1 5.5 2.20 1200* Marble N N 1 1 0 0 2 6 2.40 1201* Marble N N 0 1 0 0 1 3 1.20 1204 0 1 0 0 3 7 2.80 1205 0 1 0 0 1 3 1.20 1209 1 2 0 2 3 12 4.80 1210 1 0 0 0 2 5 2.00 1212 0 1 0 0 1 3 1.20 1215 1 0 0 0 2 5 2.00 1217 0 0 0 0 1 2 0.80 1218 0 1 0 0 2 5 2.00 1222 Granite N N 1 0 0 0 3 7 2.80 1223 Granite N N 0 1 0 0 3 7 2.80 415 Granite N N 1 1 0 2 1 7 2.80 1300* Granite N N 0 1 0 0 2 5 2.00 1306 0 2 0 0 1 4 1.60
  • 45. STAR Report Page 44 of 94 1307 N 0 3.00 1310 0 1 0 0 2 5 2.00 1313 N 0 3.00 1314 0 0 0 0 1 2 0.80 1318 0 0 0 0 2 4 1.60 1320* Maple N N 0 0 0 0 3 6 2.40 1323* Maple N N 1 0 0 1 1 4.5 1.80 1400* Maple N N 1 2 0 0 1 5 2.00 1401* Maple N N 2 1 0 0 2 7 2.80 1405 N 0 3.00 1410 N 0 3.00 1415 N 0 3.00 1418 N 0 3.00 1419 N 0 3.00 1423 N 0 3.00
  • 46. STAR Report Page 45 of 94 Address Corner C Trans Ramp II Ramp = CB LC JS MC JF TOTAL Rating Notes 6TH STREET 500* Emerald N 1 2 0 0 1 5 2.00 501* Emerald N 1 2 0 0 1 5 2.00 505 1 3 0 2 1 9 3.60 506 1 0 0 0 1 3 1.20 507 0 0 0 0 2 4 1.60 510 1 0 1 0 0 2.25 0.90 515 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.40 516 0 1 0 0 2 5 2.00 522* Jasper 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 523 Jasper N N 2 3 0 2 2 12 4.80 605* Jasper N 3 2 0 2 2 12 4.80 603* Jasper N N 0 2 0 0 2 6 2.40 604 1 1 0 0 2 6 2.40 605 1 3 0 0 1 6 2.40 608 2 1 0 2 2 10 4.00 609 0 1 0 0 1 3 1.20 612 3 1 0 0 2 8 3.20 613 1 2 0 2 2 10 4.00 617 2 2 0 2 2 11 4.40 621 Cameo N N 2 2 0 1 1 7.5 3.00 604 Cameo N N 1 3 1 2 2 12.25 4.90 702 Cameo N N 1 1 0 1 1 5.5 2.20 703 Cameo N N 1 3 0 2 2 11 4.40 707 0 1 0 0 1 3 1.20 710 1 2 0 3 1 9.5 3.80 711 0 1 0 0 2 5 2.00 713 0 2 0 0 2 6 2.40 716 1 1 0 3 2 10.5 4.20 717 1 1 0 0 1 4 1.60
  • 47. STAR Report Page 46 of 94 722* Ruby N N 1 1 0 2 2 9 3.60 723* Ruby N N 0 1 0 3 3 11.5 4.60 800* Ruby N N 1 0 0 0 2 5 2.00 803* Ruby N N 0 1 0 1 2 6.5 2.60 804 1 1 0 0 1 4 1.60 805 1 1 0 0 1 4 1.60 808 0 0 1 1 1 4.75 1.90 811 1 2 0 3 2 11.5 4.60 812 1 1 1 2 1 8.25 3.30 815 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 817 1 2 0 2 2 10 4.00 512 Pearl 1 2 0 3 3 13.5 5.40 606 Pearl 3 3 0 3 3 16.5 6.60 MoCo CH Pearl 1 0 0 0 3 7 2.80 903 Pearl 0 1 0 0 2 5 2.00 907 0 1 0 0 1 3 1.20 911 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 917 1 3 0 3 2 12.5 5.00 512 Iowa* 0 0 0 0 2 4 1.60 516 Iowa N 1 1 0 3 3 12.5 5.00 MoCo CH Iowa N 0 0 1 0 3 7.25 2.90 1002 Iowa N 2 1 0 0 1 5 2.00 1003 Iowa N 0 1 0 0 2 5 2.00 1008 0 1 0 0 3 7 2.80 1011 1 1 0 0 1 4 1.60 1014 0 0 0 0 2 4 1.60 1015 0 0 0 0 1 2 0.80 1020 0 0 0 0 2 4 1.60 1021 1 1 0 0 2 6 2.40 1025 1 0 0 0 0 1 0.40
  • 48. STAR Report Page 47 of 94 1030 0 0 0 0 2 4 1.60 1031 Diamond 1 1 0 3 3 12.5 5.00 1032 Diamond 1 2 0 1 1 6.5 2.60 603* Diamond N 1 1 0 1 2 7.5 3.00 1101* Diamond N 1 1 0 3 1 8.5 3.40 1106 0 0 0 0 1 2 0.80 1107 0 1 0 1 1 4.5 1.80 1109 0 1 0 0 2 5 2.00 1110 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.40 1112 0 1 0 3 0 5.5 2.20 1115 0 0 1 0 0 1.25 0.50 1116 3 1 0 0 0 4 1.60 1119 0 1 0 3 1 7.5 3.00 1120 Marble N N 2 1 0 3 2 11.5 4.60 1121 Marble N N 1 1 0 1 2 7.5 3.00 1202 Marble N N 1 2 0 3 2 11.5 4.60 1203* Marble N N 0 0 0 0 1 2 0.80 1206 1 1 0 1 1 5.5 2.20 1208 1 0 0 3 3 11.5 4.60 1209 0 1 0 3 2 9.5 3.80 1214 0 0 0 0 1 2 0.80 1215 0 0 0 3 3 10.5 4.20 1218 N 0 3.00 1219 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 1222 Granite N N N 0 3.00 1223 Granite N N 0 3 0 2 3 12 4.80 1300 Granite 1 N N N 0 3.00 1301* Granite N N 0 1 0 3 2 9.5 3.80 1305 0 0 0 0 1 2 0.80 1311 1 1 0 0 2 6 2.40 1315 2 1 0 0 1 5 2.00
  • 49. STAR Report Page 48 of 94 1317 2 1 0 0 1 5 2.00 1323* Maple N N 1 1 0 3 3 12.5 5.00 1400 Maple N N N 0 3.00 1401 Maple N N 1 2 0 3 1 9.5 3.80 1407 1 2 0 3 1 9.5 3.80 1411 1 1 0 3 2 10.5 4.20 1413 0 1 0 0 1 3 1.20 1415 1 1 0 1 1 5.5 2.20 1500 N 0 3.00 1501 N 0 3.00
  • 50. STAR Report Page 49 of 94 Address Corner C Trans Ramp II Ramp = CB LC JS MC JF TOTAL Rating Notes 7TH STREET 502 Emerald N 0 3.00 501* Emerald 1 1 0 3 2 10.5 4.20 505 1 2 0 2 2 10 4.00 511 0 0 0 3 3 10.5 4.20 512 N 0 3.00 515 0 0 0 3 3 10.5 4.20 516 N 0 3.00 519 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.40 520 Jasper N N N 0 3.00 523* Jasper N 0 2 0 3 3 12.5 5.00 601* Jasper N 0 0 0 3 3 10.5 4.20 602 Jasper N N N 0 3.00 608 0 0 0 0 1 2 0.80 609 1 1 0 3 2 10.5 4.20 612 N 0 3.00 613 1 1 0 3 2 10.5 4.20 618 N 0 3.00 614 Cameo N N 0 0 0 3 3 10.5 4.20 702 Cameo N N 0 2 0 0 3 8 3.20 700 Cameo N N 0 0 0 0 2 4 1.60 703 Cameo N N 0 1 0 0 1 3 1.20 705 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 712 2 1 0 2 2 10 4.00 713 0 0 0 1 1 3.5 1.40 718 1 0 0 1 1 4.5 1.80 719 Ruby N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 720* Ruby N N 0 1 0 0 1 3 1.20 801* Ruby N N 1 0 0 0 1 3 1.20 802 Ruby N N 0 0 0 0 1 2 0.80
  • 51. STAR Report Page 50 of 94 803 0 2 0 2 3 11 4.40 806 0 0 0 3 3 10.5 4.20 808 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 815 1 1 0 2 2 9 3.60 702 Pearl 1 1 0 3 3 12.5 5.00 612 Pearl 2 2 0 3 2 12.5 5.00 900 Pearl N 0 0 0 3 3 10.5 4.20 909 Pearl 1 N 0 1 1 0 1 4.25 1.70 906 1 0 0 0 0 3 6 2.40 910 1 0 0 0 0 2 4 1.60 610 Iowa 1 0 1 0 3 1 7.5 3.00 700 Iowa 1 0 1 0 3 1 7.5 3.00 704 Iowa* 0 2 0 1 2 7.5 3.00 706 Iowa* 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.40 708 Iowa* 1 0 0 0 0 1 2 0.80 710 Iowa* 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 707 Iowa 1 N 2 1 2 1 2 11 4.40 1003 Iowa 2 1 0 0 2 7 2.80 1007 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 1015 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 1019 Diamond 1 1 0 0 1 4 1.60 707 Diamond 2 1 2 1 3 13 5.20 1102* Diamond N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 1103* Diamond N 1 1 0 0 1 4 1.60 1105 2 3 0 0 1 7 2.80 1106 0 0 0 0 1 2 0.80 1108 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 1109 1 1 0 0 0 2 0.80 1114 1 2 0 3 1 9.5 3.80 1115 0 0 0 0 1 2 0.80 1117 1 2 0 2 2 10 4.00
  • 52. STAR Report Page 51 of 94 1118 0 0 0 0 1 2 0.80 1122 Marble N 0 1 0 0 1 3 1.20 612 Marble 2 1 0 3 3 13.5 5.40 609 Marble N N N 0 3.00 700 Marble N N N 0 3.00 1205 1 2 0 1 2 8.5 3.40 1209 N 0 3.00 1213 2 2 0 2 3 13 5.20 1217 N 0 3.00 614 Granite N N N 0 3.00 1301 Granite N 0 1 0 0 1 3 1.20 700 Granite N N N 0 3.00 702 Granite N N N 0 3.00
  • 53. STAR Report Page 52 of 94 Address Corner C Trans Ramp II Ramp = CB LC JS MC JF TOTAL Rating Notes 8TH STREET 710 N 0 3.00 802 Emerald N N 0 3.00 804 Emerald* 1 N 0 3.00 500 Emerald N N N 0 3.00 715* Emerald N N 0 0 0 1 1 3.5 1.40 509 1 1 0 0 1 4 1.60 511 0 1 0 0 2 5 2.00 519 0 0 0 0 2 4 1.60 712* Jasper N N 0 0 0 0 1 2 0.80 522 Jasper N N 0 3.00 600 Jasper N N 0 3.00 713* Jasper N N 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.40 611 2 1 0 1 0 4.5 1.80 613 2 2 0 2 0 7 2.80 623 Cameo N N 1 3 0 0 2 8 3.20 622 Cameo N 0 3.00 700 Cameo N N 0 3.00 701 Cameo N N 0 1 1 0 2 6.25 2.50 713 0 1 0 3 1 7.5 3.00 717 0 0 0 0 1 2 0.80 714* Ruby N 0 0 0 3 3 10.5 4.20 803* Ruby N N 0 0 0 3 3 10.5 4.20 809 1 N 0 3.00 700 Pearl N N 0 3.00 721 Pearl 1 N N 0 3.00 814* Pearl N 1 1 0 0 2 6 2.40 900* Pearl 1 N 1 0 1 0 1 4.25 1.70 901 N 0 3.00 911 N 0 3.00
  • 54. STAR Report Page 53 of 94 945 N 0 3.00 720 Iowa 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 718 Iowa* 1 0 1 0 3 1 7.5 3.00 800 Iowa 1 1 1 1 1 1 6.75 2.70 806 Iowa* 1 1 1 0 1 0 3.5 1.40 808 Iowa* 1 1 1 0 0 0 2 0.80 801 Iowa 1 N N 1 1 0 2 1 7 2.80 803 Iowa* 1 0 1 0 2 1 6 2.40 805 Iowa* 1 0 0 0 1 1 3.5 1.40 807 Iowa* 1 0 0 0 0 1 2 0.80 809 Iowa* 1 0 0 0 0 1 2 0.80 1001 Iowa 1 N 0 1 0 0 1 3 1.20 1004 1 1 1 0 3 3 12.5 5.00 1034 Diamond 1 1 1 0 3 2 10.5 4.20 1023 Diamond 1 1 1 1 0 2 7.25 2.90 1100 Diamond N 1 2 0 3 2 11.5 4.60 1101 Diamond N N 0 0 0 3 3 10.5 4.20 1106 1 2 0 1 2 8.5 3.40 1112 1 0 0 0 3 7 2.80 1118 1 0 0 0 0 1 2 0.80 802* Marble N 0 0 0 3 1 6.5 2.60 1123 Marble N N 0 0 0 3 3 10.5 4.20 1201 Marble N N 0 0 0 3 3 10.5 4.20 1204 Marble N 2 1 0 3 2 11.5 4.60 1206 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.40 1208 1 2 0 3 1 9.5 3.80 1214 2 2 0 1 1 7.5 3.00 1218 1 0 0 0 1 3 1.20 1220 Granite N N 1 2 0 1 2 8.5 3.40 1223 Granite N N N 0 3.00 1302 Granite N N 0 1 1 0 2 6.25 2.50
  • 55. STAR Report Page 54 of 94 1305 Granite N N 0 3.00 1310 0 0 0 2 0 3 1.20 1311 1 N 0 3.00 1314 1 1 0 3 1 8.5 3.40 1318 1 1 0 3 1 8.5 3.40 1412 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 1313 N 0 3.00 1418 N 0 3.00 1500 N 0 3.00 1510 N 0 3.00 1512 N 0 3.00 1514 N 0 3.00 1609 1 N 0 3.00
  • 56. STAR Report Page 55 of 94 Address Corner C Trans Ramp II Ramp = CB LC JS MC JF TOTAL Rating Notes 9TH STREET 100 220th N N N 0 3.00 101 220th N N N 0 3.00 200 N 0 3.00 201 N 0 3.00 300 N 0 3.00 301 N 0 3.00 318 N 0 3.00 320 N 0 3.00 400 N 0 3.00 401 N 0 3.00 422 Emerald N N N 0 3.00 423 Emerald N N N 0 3.00 500 Emerald 1 N N N 0 3.00 501 Emerald N N N 0 3.00 504 N 0 3.00 505 N 0 3.00 508 N 0 3.00 509 1 N 0 3.00 510 N 0 3.00 511 N 0 3.00 522 Jasper N N N 0 3.00 519 Jasper 1 N 0 3.00 523 Jasper 1 N 0 3.00 600 Jasper N N N 0 3.00 601 Jasper 1 N 0 3.00 606 0 1 0 0 1 3 1.20 609 1 1 0 3 2 10.5 4.20 610 1 2 2 2 1 10.5 4.20 613 3 1 0 0 2 8 3.20
  • 57. STAR Report Page 56 of 94 614 0 1 0 2 2 8 3.20 812* Cameo N 0 1 0 0 2 5 2.00 900 Cameo N N 0 2 1 3 3 13.75 5.50 702 Cameo N 3 1 0 3 2 12.5 5.00 813* Cameo N 0 1 0 0 2 5 2.00 710 1 0 2 2 2 1 9.5 3.80 713 1 N 0 3.00 719 1 N 0 3.00 722 Ruby 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 723 Ruby 1 N N 0 3.00 901 Ruby N 0 1 0 0 1 3 1.20 801 Ruby N N 0 3.00 802 1 0 1 0 3 3 11.5 4.60 814* Pearl 1 N 3 1 1 1 0 6.75 2.70 900 Pearl 1 1 1 1 0 2 7.25 2.90 906 Pearl 1 N N 1 1 0 0 1 4 1.60 908 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 Com Play 912 0 0 0 3 3 10.5 4.20 905* Pearl N N 1 1 1 3 3 13.75 5.50 915 1 0 1 0 0 2.25 0.90 920 1 1 0 0 1 4 1.60 820 Iowa 1 N 3 1 0 1 1 7.5 3.00 816 Iowa 1 0 0 1 0 1 3.25 1.30 812 Iowa 1 1 0 1 0 1 4.25 1.70 902 Iowa* 1 1 1 3 1 2 11.25 4.50 904 Iowa* 1 0 0 0 0 1 2 0.80 906 Iowa* 1 0 0 1 0 1 3.25 1.30 908 Iowa* 1 0 1 1 0 1 4.25 1.70 910 Iowa* 1 0 0 0 0 1 2 0.80 909 Iowa* 1 0 0 0 0 1 2 0.80 907 Iowa* 1 0 0 0 0 1 2 0.80
  • 58. STAR Report Page 57 of 94 905 Iowa* 1 0 0 0 0 1 2 0.80 903 Iowa* 1 0 0 0 0 2 4 1.60 901 Iowa 1 N N 2 1 0 3 3 13.5 5.40 821 Iowa 1 N N 0 1 1 0 2 6.25 2.50 817 Iowa* 1 0 0 1 0 0 1.25 0.50 813 Iowa* 1 0 0 0 0 1 2 0.80 811 Iowa* 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 1014 1 2 0 0 0 0 2 0.80 1015 1 1 1 0 0 0 2 0.80 1019 1 1 1 0 0 0 2 0.80 1021 1 1 1 0 0 0 2 0.80 1023 1 1 1 1 0 0 3.25 1.30 1026 1 1 2 1 0 1 6.25 2.50 1027 Diamond 1 1 1 1 0 1 5.25 2.10 1030 Diamond 1 N N 1 3 1 3 2 13.75 5.50 813 Diamond 1 N N 1 1 1 3 2 11.75 4.70 903 Diamond 1 2 2 0 1 1 7.5 3.00 1108 0 1 1 1 0 3.75 1.50 1109 1 1 2 0 2 1 8 3.20 1110 0 1 1 0 0 2.25 0.90 1113 1 1 0 0 2 6 2.40 1114 1 1 0 3 3 12.5 5.00 1120* Marble N 1 1 0 0 2 6 2.40 1121 Marble N 1 1 0 0 1 4 1.60 815 Marble 0 0 0 0 2 4 1.60 1202 Marble 1 1 1 1 0 2 7.25 2.90 1204 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 1206 1 0 1 3 1 8.75 3.50 1207 1 1 0 2 1 7 2.80 1211 1 3 0 3 1 10.5 4.20 1214 0 1 0 0 3 7 2.80
  • 59. STAR Report Page 58 of 94 1215 1 1 0 3 1 8.5 3.40 1219 0 0 0 3 2 8.5 3.40 1221 Granite N N 1 2 1 3 2 12.75 5.10 1222* Granite N N 1 2 0 2 3 12 4.80 1300 Granite N 1 2 0 3 3 13.5 5.40 1303* Granite N N 0 0 0 1 1 3.5 1.40 1306 1 0 0 1 0 2.5 1.00 1309 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 1310 1 0 0 0 2 5 2.00 1312 0 0 0 0 1 2 0.80 1315 1 1 0 0 0 2 0.80 1316 1 0 0 0 1 3 1.20 1319 1 1 0 0 1 4 1.60 1321 Maple N 1 1 0 2 3 11 4.40 1322 Maple N N 1 1 0 3 1 8.5 3.40 1400 Maple N N 2 1 2 1 2 11 4.40 1401 Maple N 1 1 0 0 2 6 2.40 1403 0 1 0 1 0 2.5 1.00 1406 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 1407 0 1 0 2 1 6 2.40 1409 0 2 0 1 0 3.5 1.40 1410 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 1412 1 1 0 0 0 2 0.80 1413 0 1 0 3 1 7.5 3.00 1416 1 1 0 0 1 4 1.60 1417 1 1 0 1 2 7.5 3.00 1420 1 1 0 2 1 7 2.80 1421 1 1 0 1 3 9.5 3.80 1500 1 2 0 2 1 8 3.20 1501 N 0 3.00 1504 0 1 0 0 2 5 2.00
  • 60. STAR Report Page 59 of 94 Address Corner C Trans Ramp II Ramp = CB LC JS MC JF TOTAL Rating Notes 10TH STREET 100 220th N N N 0 3.00 101 220th 1 N N N 0 3.00 200 2 2 0 0 1 6 2.40 201 N 0 3.00 219 N 0 3.00 300 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 301 1 N 0 3.00 317 1 N 0 3.00 400 1 N 0 3.00 CC 401 1 N 0 3.00 405 1 N 0 3.00 407 1 N 0 3.00 408 1 N 0 3.00 412 1 N 0 3.00 420 Emerald 1 N N N 0 3.00 421 Emerald 1 N N N 0 3.00 412 Emerald* N 0 3.00 500 Emerald N 1 1 0 0 1 4 1.60 501 Emerald 1 N 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.40 502 1 1 0 2 2 9 3.60 510 0 0 0 0 2 4 1.60 512 1 2 1 3 2 12.75 5.10 521* Jasper 1 N N 1 1 0 3 2 10.5 4.20 522* Jasper 1 N 1 1 0 1 2 7.5 3.00 600 Jasper 1 0 1 0 3 2 9.5 3.80 609* Jasper 1 0 1 1 1 0 3.75 1.50 604 2 1 0 3 1 9.5 3.80 608 1 1 0 3 1 8.5 3.40 612 1 3 0 1 2 9.5 3.80
  • 61. STAR Report Page 60 of 94 613 1 0 0 0 0 1 0.40 617 1 2 0 3 2 11.5 4.60 618 Cameo 1 0 1 0 3 2 9.5 3.80 621 Cameo 1 N 2 1 0 3 3 13.5 5.40 701* Cameo N N 1 1 0 3 1 8.5 3.40 706 Cameo 1 N 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.40 707 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 711 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.40 714 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 718 Ruby 1 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 723* Ruby 1 N 0 1 1 0 1 4.25 1.70 801* Ruby 1 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 802 Ruby 1 N 0 0 0 3 3 10.5 4.20 804 1 0 1 1 2 2 9.25 3.70 805 0 0 0 0 1 2 0.80 809 1 1 0 1 1 5.5 2.20 812 0 0 0 3 2 8.5 3.40 815 1 1 0 3 1 8.5 3.40 816 1 0 0 0 0 1 0.40 821 Pearl 1 1 0 0 1 4 1.60 1004 Pearl 1 1 1 1 0 1 5.25 2.10 901 Pearl 1 N 1 2 0 1 2 8.5 3.40 902 Pearl 1 1 1 1 1 2 8.75 3.50 919 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.40 920 1 0 1 1 0 2 6.25 2.50 922 0 1 1 0 2 6.25 2.50 923 1 1 1 0 0 1 4 1.60 926 1 1 0 2 1 7 2.80 928 1 0 0 0 0 1 2 0.80 930 1 N 0 3.00 933 Iowa 1 N N 1 1 1 1 2 8.75 3.50
  • 62. STAR Report Page 61 of 94 912 Iowa* 1 1 1 0 0 2 6 2.40 914 Iowa* 1 0 0 0 0 1 2 0.80 916 Iowa* 1 0 0 0 0 1 2 0.80 918 Iowa* 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 1004 Iowa 1 N N 2 1 0 2 2 10 5.00 1012 Iowa* 1 0 2 0 0 2 6 2.40 1000 Iowa 1 N 0 0 0 3 3 10.5 4.20 1005 Iowa* 1 1 1 0 0 2 6 2.40 1009 Iowa* 1 0 2 0 0 1 4 1.60 921 Iowa 1 N 1 1 0 1 1 5.5 2.20 913 Iowa* 1 0 0 0 0 1 2 0.80 915 Iowa* 1 0 0 0 0 1 2 0.80 917 Iowa* 1 0 0 0 0 1 2 0.80 1011 1 1 1 0 2 2 9 3.60 1010 1 0 0 0 0 1 2 0.80 1013 1 1 1 0 0 0 2 0.80 1016 1 2 2 0 1 2 9.5 3.80 1019 1 1 0 0 0 1 3 1.20 1023 1 1 1 0 0 1 4 1.60 1030 Diamond 1 2 1 2 0 1 7.5 3.00 914 Diamond 1 1 0 2 0 1 5.5 2.20 1100 Diamond 1 3 1 1 2 2 12.25 4.90 915 Diamond N 1 1 0 2 1 7 2.80 911 Diamond* 1 0 3 0 0 0 3 1.20 1111 1 1 1 0 1 3 9.5 3.80 1113 1 0 1 0 0 2 5 2.00 1119 0 1 0 0 1 3 1.20 1121* Marble N 0 0 0 0 1 2 0.80 1122 Marble 1 N N 2 2 1 3 2 13.75 5.50 1200 Marble N N 1 2 1 2 3 13.25 5.30 1203 Marble 1 0 0 0 0 1 2 0.80
  • 63. STAR Report Page 62 of 94 1205 0 0 0 0 1 2 0.80 1206 0 1 0 0 1 3 1.20 1208 0 1 1 0 1 4.25 1.70 1211 0 1 0 0 2 5 2.00 1212 1 1 1 0 1 5.25 2.10 1213 1 2 1 0 1 6.25 2.50 1218 1 1 1 0 1 5.25 2.10 1219 1 1 0 1 3 9.5 3.80 1221* Granite N 1 2 0 1 2 8.5 3.40 1004* Granite N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 1300* Granite N N 1 1 0 0 1 4 1.60 1303 Granite 1 3 0 3 2 12.5 5.00 1304 0 0 0 0 1 2 0.80 1307 1 3 0 3 3 14.5 5.80 1308 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 1311 0 0 1 0 1 3.25 1.30 1314 2 1 0 2 0 6 2.40 1315 0 0 0 0 1 2 0.80 1318 1 0 1 1 2 7.75 3.10 1319 0 0 0 0 2 4 1.60 1322 Maple N 1 1 1 1 3 10.75 4.30 1323 Maple N 1 1 0 1 1 5.5 2.20 1402 Maple N 1 1 1 1 3 10.75 4.30 1403 Maple N 0 2 0 0 3 8 3.20 1405 0 0 1 0 1 3.25 1.30 1408 0 1 1 0 0 2.25 0.90 1409 1 1 0 0 2 6 2.40 1410 0 1 0 0 3 7 2.80 1412 1 1 1 1 3 10.75 4.30 1413 0 1 0 0 2 5 2.00 1416 0 1 0 0 2 5 2.00
  • 64. STAR Report Page 63 of 94 1417 0 1 0 0 2 5 2.00 1419 1 1 0 0 3 8 3.20 1423 1 1 0 0 2 6 2.40 1501 N 0 3.00 1502 N 0 2 0 0 1 4 3.80 Not Complete 1505 1 N 0 3.00 1511 N 0 3.00 1519 Lucas 1 N 0 3.00 1000 Lucas 1 N N N 0 3.00 1006 Lucas 1 N N N 0 3.00 1523 Lucas N 0 3.00 1603 N 0 3.00 1629 N 0 3.00 1631 N 0 3.00 1622 N 0 3.00
  • 65. STAR Report Page 64 of 94 Address Corner C Trans Ramp II Ramp = CB LC JS MC JF TOTAL Rating Notes 11TH STREET 1019 Emerald N N N 0 3.00 1105 Emerald N N 2 2 2 2 3 15.5 6.20 504 1 1 0 0 0 2 0.80 505 N 0 3.00 506 1 1 0 0 1 4 1.60 511 N 0 3.00 512 2 2 0 0 1 6 2.40 515 N 0 3.00 517 N 0 3.00 518 3 2 0 0 2 9 3.60 520* Jasper N N 0 1 0 0 2 5 2.00 1018 Jasper N N 1 2 0 1 3 10.5 4.20 600* Jasper N N 1 0 0 1 1 4.5 1.80 601 Jasper N N 1 3 0 1 1 7.5 3.00 605 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 606 1 1 1 0 2 7.25 2.90 611 0 1 0 0 2 5 2.00 612 1 1 1 1 2 8.75 3.50 613 1 1 0 0 1 4 1.60 616 1 1 2 1 1 8 3.20 619 1 1 0 0 2 6 2.40 622 Cameo N N 2 3 3 3 3 19.25 7.70 1012 Cameo N N 1 3 1 2 2 12.25 4.90 700* Cameo N N 3 1 0 0 2 8 3.20 701* Cameo N 0 1 0 0 2 5 2.00 705 0 1 0 0 1 3 1.20 706 0 0 1 1 1 4.75 1.90 708 1 1 0 0 1 4 1.60 711 2 2 0 3 3 14.5 5.80
  • 66. STAR Report Page 65 of 94 712 0 0 0 2 1 5 2.00 722 Ruby N 1 1 0 3 2 10.5 4.20 723 Ruby N 1 1 0 3 3 12.5 5.00 800 Ruby N 1 1 0 1 1 5.5 2.20 801* Ruby N 1 1 0 2 3 11 4.40 804 0 1 0 2 1 6 2.40 805 1 2 0 1 1 6.5 2.60 810 1 1 0 0 2 6 2.40 811 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 812 0 1 0 1 1 4.5 1.80 813 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.40 1012 Pearl 1 1 1 1 2 8.75 3.50 1108 Pearl N 1 2 0 3 2 11.5 4.60 900 Pearl N N 1 2 0 0 3 9 3.60 901 Pearl 1 N 0 0 1 0 2 5.25 2.10 905 0 0 0 0 2 4 1.60 906 0 2 0 0 0 2 0.80 911 1 1 0 1 2 7.5 3.00 917 1 1 0 3 2 10.5 4.20 1014 Iowa* 1 1 1 1 0 0 3.25 1.30 1016 Iowa* 0 3 0 1 2 8.5 3.40 1017 Iowa 0 0 0 0 2 4 1.60 1018 Iowa* 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0.40 1020 Iowa 0 1 0 0 3 7 2.80 1106 Iowa 3 2 1 3 2 14.75 5.90 1015 Iowa 1 1 3 1 0 0 5.25 2.10 1102 Iowa 1 1 3 1 0 0 5.25 2.10 1017 Diamond 1 1 1 0 0 1 4 1.60 1018 Diamond 1 1 0 1 0 1 4.25 1.70 1100 Diamond 0 0 0 0 1 2 0.80 1101 Diamond 1 3 0 1 2 9.5 3.80
  • 67. STAR Report Page 66 of 94 1104 1 2 0 3 3 13.5 5.40 1114 1 2 0 0 2 7 2.80 1116 0 2 0 0 2 6 2.40 1120 Marble 2 1 0 2 2 10 4.00 1123 Marble 1 2 0 2 2 10 4.00 1009 Marble* 1 0 0 0 0 1 0.40 1015 Marble 1 3 0 3 1 10.5 4.20 1200 Marble 1 1 0 1 1 5.5 2.20 1205 1 1 2 0 0 2 7 2.80 1206 1 3 0 3 2 12.5 5.00 1208 0 2 2 2 2 11.5 4.60 1213 2 1 0 0 1 5 2.00 1214 1 2 0 2 2 10 4.00 1219 2 2 1 0 2 9.25 3.70 1222* Granite N N 0 1 0 0 2 5 2.00 1223* Granite N N 0 1 0 0 2 5 2.00 1300* Granite N N 1 0 0 0 2 5 2.00 1009* Granite N N 1 1 0 0 1 4 1.60 1307 2 1 0 0 1 5 2.00 1308 1 1 0 1 2 7.5 3.00 1309 0 0 0 1 2 5.5 2.20 1310 0 1 1 2 1 7.25 2.90 1314 2 2 0 2 2 11 4.40 1315 0 0 1 0 1 3.25 1.30 1317 0 0 1 0 3 7.25 2.90 1318 0 0 1 1 0 2.75 1.10 1321 Maple N N 1 1 0 0 3 8 3.20 1322 Maple N N 0 2 0 0 2 6 2.40 1015* Maple N N 1 3 0 0 2 8 3.20 1400 Maple N N 1 1 0 2 2 9 3.60 1406 0 1 0 0 2 5 2.00
  • 68. STAR Report Page 67 of 94 1407 N 0 3.00 1408 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.40 1410 1 2 0 1 1 6.5 2.60 1411 1 0 0 0 1 3 1.20 1412 1 1 0 0 2 6 2.40 1414 2 1 0 1 3 10.5 4.20 1415 N 0 3.00 1417 N 0 3.00 1500 N 0 3.00
  • 69. STAR Report Page 68 of 94 Address Corner C Trans Ramp II Ramp = CB LC JS MC JF TOTAL Rating Notes 12TH STREET 100 N 0 3.00 Fr Grnds 101 N 1 1 1 0 2 7.25 4.45 Museum 200 Gaukel N 0 3.00 Fr Grnds 203 Gaukel 0 1 0 0 1 3 1.20 Vets 217 Gaukel 1 2 1 0 2 8.25 3.30 Pool 218 Guakel N 0 3.00 300 N 0 3.00 G. Park 305 1 1 0 1 2 7.5 3.00 Shelter W 305 2 1 0 2 2 10 4.00 Shelter E 321 1 1 1 0 2 7.25 2.90 CC Park 322 N 0 3.00 G. Park 400 N 0 3.00 401 1 2 0 0 2 7 2.80 CC P-Lot 409 0 1 0 0 2 5 2.00 410 N 0 3.00 417 1 2 0 0 2 7 2.80 418 N 0 3.00 1112* Emerald N 1 1 0 0 2 6 2.40 1202 Emerald N N N 0 3.00 1208 Emerald* N 0 3.00 1205 Emerald N N 0 3.00 503 Emerald N 0 1 1 1 2 7.75 3.10 506 N 0 3.00 507 1 2 0 1 1 6.5 2.60 508 N 509 0 2 0 2 2 9 3.60 512 N 0 3.00 514 0 1 0 1 2 6.5 2.60 515 N 0 3.00
  • 70. STAR Report Page 69 of 94 519 0 2 0 2 2 9 3.60 522* Jasper N 0 1 1 3 2 10.75 4.30 523 Jasper N 0 1 0 2 1 6 2.40 600* Jasper N 0 0 0 2 1 5 2.00 601 Jasper N 1 3 0 2 2 11 4.40 607 3 2 0 1 2 10.5 4.20 610 0 0 0 3 3 10.5 4.20 611 0 2 0 2 3 11 4.40 612 1 1 0 2 2 9 3.60 614 0 1 0 0 1 3 1.20 615 1 2 0 1 1 6.5 2.60 616 0 1 1 0 2 6.25 2.50 619 3 2 0 0 1 7 2.80 1112 Cameo 0 2 0 3 3 12.5 5.00 1204 Cameo 0 1 0 3 3 11.5 4.60 1115 Cameo N 0 0 0 0 2 4 1.60 1201 Cameo N N N 0 3.00 Liberty 709 2 1 0 2 1 8 3.20 713 1 1 0 1 1 5.5 2.20 715 1 0 0 0 2 5 2.00 717 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 721 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 721 Ruby 1 N 0 0 1 0 1 3.25 1.30 722 Ruby N N N 0 3.00 Liberty 800 Ruby N N N 0 3.00 801* Ruby N 2 3 0 2 3 14 5.60 804 1 1 0 0 2 6 2.40 807 0 1 0 3 1 7.5 3.00 808 1 2 0 1 1 6.5 2.60 809 0 0 0 0 1 2 0.80 812 0 1 0 0 2 5 2.00
  • 71. STAR Report Page 70 of 94 817 0 2 0 3 2 10.5 4.20 818 0 1 0 0 1 3 1.20 1112 Pearl* 0 0 0 0 2 4 1.60 1116 Pearl N 3 1 0 1 1 7.5 3.00 1204 Pearl N 1 2 0 1 2 8.5 3.40 1205* Pearl N 0 1 0 0 1 3 1.20 901* Pearl N 2 0 0 0 2 6 2.40 904 0 1 0 0 1 3 1.20 905 2 2 1 2 1 10.25 4.10 908 N 0 3.00 915 1 1 0 0 3 8 3.20 919 0 1 0 0 1 3 1.20 1114 Iowa* 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 1118 Iowa 1 1 0 3 1 8.5 3.40 1202* Iowa N 1 1 0 0 0 2 0.80 1206 Iowa* 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.40 1201 Iowa N 1 1 1 0 2 7.25 2.90 Chrch Lot 1001 Iowa N 1 1 0 0 2 6 2.40 Fiesta Lot 1012 1 2 0 0 2 7 2.80 1015 0 1 0 0 2 5 2.00 1020 Diamond 1 1 0 2 3 11 4.40 1112 Diamond 1 3 0 1 2 9.5 3.80 1115 Diamond N 0 2 0 1 2 7.5 3.00 1100 Diamond 1 1 0 0 1 4 1.60 1105 2 1 1 0 1 6.25 2.50 1106 1 0 0 0 1 3 1.20 1110 1 0 0 0 0 1 0.40 1112 0 2 0 0 1 4 1.60 1113 1 2 1 0 2 8.25 3.30 1117 0 1 0 0 2 5 2.00 1120 0 2 0 0 1 4 1.60
  • 72. STAR Report Page 71 of 94 1114 Marble 1 2 2 3 1 12 4.80 1122 Marble 0 1 0 0 2 5 2.00 1115 Marble 1 1 0 2 2 9 3.60 1200 Marble 0 2 0 0 2 6 2.40 1206 0 1 0 1 2 6.5 2.60 1207 0 1 0 0 1 3 1.20 1209 0 2 0 0 1 4 1.60 1210 1 1 0 2 2 9 3.60 1212 1 1 0 0 0 2 0.80 1215 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 1216 1 3 0 2 3 13 5.20 1217 0 1 0 0 1 3 1.20 1220* Granite N N 0 0 0 2 1 5 2.00 1221* Granite N N 0 0 1 0 2 5.25 2.10 1301* Granite N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 1302* Granite N 1 1 0 0 1 4 1.60 1304 1 2 0 0 3 9 3.60 1305 1 0 0 0 1 3 1.20 1309 0 0 0 0 1 2 0.80 1312 1 1 0 2 1 7 2.80 1315 0 0 0 0 1 2 0.80 1317 2 0 0 3 1 8.5 3.40 1318 1 1 0 0 2 6 2.40 1322 Maple N N 1 2 0 1 3 10.5 4.20 1323 Maple N N 1 2 0 1 2 8.5 3.40 1115* Maple N N 1 2 0 1 1 6.5 2.60 1402 Maple N N 2 1 0 0 3 9 3.60 1409 N 0 3.00 1410 0 0 0 1 1 3.5 1.40 1412 1 1 0 0 1 4 1.60 1413 N 0 3.00
  • 73. STAR Report Page 72 of 94 1417 N 0 3.00 1418 13th Pl N N N 0 3.00 1423 13th Pl N 0 3.00 1501 13th Pl N 0 3.00 1506 13th Pl N N N 0 3.00 1507 N 0 3.00 1512 N 0 3.00