Dr. Lohrisch's research presentation is about a multi-disciplinary approach to treatment therapies that will assist oncologists in choosing the right treatment, for the right woman, for the right disease.
Learn more about her research http://ow.ly/Fzfdt
2. Survival after early breast
cancer
Improvements over time:
adjuvant taxanes, AIs (2000+)
Adjuvant trastuzumab (2005+)
Survival in BC: Best in Canada and similar to Australia, Sweden
3. Stage distribution at
presentation
Stage Definition % Patients
I T1N0 30
IIA T0N1
T1N1
T2N0
50
IIB T2N1
T3N0
IIIA T0N2
T1N2
T2N2
15
IIIB T4Nany
IIIC TanyN3
IV TanyNanyM1 5
4. Early BC treatment pples
Surgery: PM, M, AXND, SNB
Radiation: Breast, loco-reg, chest wall
Hormone Rx: what, how long, who
Chemotherapy: what, how much, who
Anti-HER2 therapy: who, how long
5. Local Therapy
SURGERY
Breast:
Partial mastectomy
Mastectomy
Axilla:
Sentinel node biopsy
Most cases
Axillary dissection
May follow sentinel bx
In clinically positive
nodes
RADIATION
Breast:
After partial
mastectomy
After mastectomy if
Positive surgical
margins
Lymphatic invasion
If positive nodes
Nodes: if contain
cancer
Axilla, supraclavicular,
internal mammary
6. Systemic Therapy
Choice of treatment is based on
Hormone therapy: expression of ER, PR
Chemotherapy: absolute recurrence risk,
age, co-morbidity
Anti-HER2 therapy: HER2 positivity,
indications for chemotherapy, adequate
cardiac function
7. How to Assess risk and
treatment benefit
Traditional: T, N, grade, ER, HER2,
LVI
Enhanced pathology: Adjuvant! On
line (adds age, co-morbidity, effect
of adjuvant intervention)
Other prognostic tools: Oncotype
Dx, mammaprint, PAM50, etc
8. The old paradigm
High risk: chemo
Young
Node positive
Big cancer
High grade
ER –
HER2+
Low risk: no chemo
Older
Node negative
Small cancer
Low grade
ER+
9. The new paradigm
Size doesn’t matter
Nodal status may or may not matter
Phenotype (ER, PR, HER2) and biology
matter
These apply not only to natural history but
to responsiveness to treatment
10. Prognostic/Predictive
variables
Lower risk
Older (menopausal)
Small T
NN
Grade 1,2
ER 2-3+
Her2 negative
Higher risk
Younger
(premenopausal)
Larger T
Node positive
Grade 3
ER 1+ or ER negative
Her2 positive
LVI
11. Premenopausal ER+ breast
cancer
38y premenopausal woman post partial
mastectomy for 1.8cm, grade 3, ER 2+, PR-,
HER2-, node negative ductal cancer with
lymphatic invasion (LVI).
Hormone therapy: if ER and/or PR positive
Chemotherapy: determined by recurrence risk
Clinical predictors for recurrence: grade, LVI, young
age
Clinical predictors for benefit from treatment: ER
(hormone therapy); ?age, grade (chemo)
12. Menopausal case:
68y menopausal woman post mastectomy for 2.7cm,
grade 1, ER3+, PR 3+, HER2-, 1 node positive
ductal carcinoma.
Co-morbidities HTN, diabetes, high cholesterol,
overweight
Medications: ramipril; metformin; lipitor
Grade, strong ER/PR, and node negative predict for low
recurrence
Grade, strong ER/PR, age predict for low benefit from
chemo
Age, comorbidities predict for lack of survival benefit from
chemo
13. Molecular subtypes
Luminal A: ER+, low Ki67, her2-
Luminal B: ER+, high Ki67, her2-
Normal: ER+, Her2+
Her2+: ER-, PgR-
Basal: triple negative, EGFR+
Different gene exp’n, natural hx and response to
Rx. Basal are chemo sensitive but have worst OS.
Her2+ also have poor Px high prolif index
(influence of Herceptin)
14. Tools to help us
PROGNOSTIC, (estimate risk): clinical
experience; adjuvant online; Oncotype
Dx Recurrence Score; intrinsic subtype
(luminal A vs B); Mammaprint; UPA,
PAI-1
PREDICTIVE, (estimate benefit): clinical
experience; clinical trials; adjuvant
online; Oncotype Dx; PEPI score
(neoadjuvant hormone therapy)
15. Adjuvant online
Limitations:
• Her2 and LVI not adequately accounted for
• Less accurate for very small cancers, and very young pts
16. Microarray gene exp:
Oncotype DX
21 gene expression panel (RNA expression
using RT-PCR: 16 cancer genes, 5 reference
genes NSABP B14: ER+, node
negative postmenopausal
women with TAM
NSABP B20: ER+ node
negative with TAM or CMF
and TAM
INT100: ER+
postmenopausal node
positive with TAM or TAM/
CAF
Other markers: MammaPrint; uPA, PAI-1
17. Oncotype Dx
Tissue based assay to assess risk in HR+ node
negative BC
Retrospective analyses suggest that for a
low and intermediate score, there is NO
additional benefit from chemotherapy
18. Oncotype Dx
Recurrence score (RS) depends heavily
on ER and proliferation markers (grade
and degree of ER positivity are the poor
man’s Oncotype Dx)
Generally weak ER+ cancers and higher
grade cancers will have a higher RS
<5% of grade 1 cancers will have high RS
and 10% of grade 3 cancers will have a
low RS
Not yet validated for NP premenopausal
BC
20. Hormone therapy options
Premenopausal
Tamoxifen
5 years
10 years
Switch to AI at 5y for
another 5y
(menopausal)
Ovarian ablation + tam
Ovarian ablation +
Aromatase Inhibitor
(AI)
Menopausal
Early switch
AI x 5 years
Tam x 5 years
Stop at 5 years
Continue to 10 years
Switch to AI at 5 years
for another 5 years
“Switch”: tamoxifen for 2-3 years followed by AI for balance of
5 years
21. Tamoxifen (T): mechanism of
action
, cells die
located in cell
nucleus
Effective in premenopausal and
postmenopausal women with ER+ BC
Role in primary prevention; adjuvant
therapy; metastatic disease
Partial agonist effects: bone;
endometrium; CVS
T
Estrogen can’t
bind
22. 5 years Tamoxifen
EBCTCG. Lancet 1998; Lancet 2005;365:1687; Reproduced with permission from Elsevier
NNT:
DFS: 8
OS: 11
• Magnitude
similar in all age
groups (<50,
50-69, 70+)
• Effect persists to
15 years
• Relapses
continue beyond
5 years follow up
RRR 28% RRR 28%
24. What about ovary
suppression
EBCTCG:
30% RRR death with oophorectomy vs not
no benefit to oophorectomy if chemo given
ZIPP study
No added benefit to adding oophorectomy to TAM
ABCSG 12
Equivalent benefit from TAM and ANA with LHRHa
(no chemo)
SOFT/TEXT
EXE superior to TAM when combined with LHRHa
regardless of chemo use
25. Nuances…
If TAMOXIFEN x5y is the standard:
Are tam and OA the same?
Are two hormone therapies better than one?
What about when there are contraindications
or harm from tamoxifen
VTE
Endometrial cancer
Depression
Contribution of bisphosphonates to hormone
therapy?
26. Aromatase Inhibitors ( )
Androstenedione Testosterone
Aromatase Aromatase
Estrone Estradiol
Estrone sulphate
Postmenopausal women: Major source of total body estrogen
Premenopausal women: Minor source of total body estrogen
ANASTROZOLE (ARIMIDEX)
LETROZOLE (FEMARA)
EXEMESTANE (AROMASIN)
Reversible inhibitors
Irreversible inhibitor
27. Adjuvant AI meta-analysis
Compared with 5 years of tamoxifen:
3% improvement in DFS with AI x5y
1.1% NON-significant difference in BC-mortality
3% improvement in DFS with switch
0.7% improvement in BC-mortality
DFS = relapse, new CLBC, death from any
cause
NNT = 33 (SWITCH or AI 5y instead of 5y TAM)
NNT = 6 (SWITCH or AI 5y instead of No hormone therapy)
Dowset, JCO 2010
28. More than 5 years hormone
therapy
5 vs 10 years Tamoxifen
5 y of letrozole or
placebo after 5 y
tamoxifen
Atlas study, Lancet
2012
MA.17 study, JCO 2011
Overall survival benefit of 10 vs 5 years hormone therapy:
2-4%
29. Extended Adjuvant: MA17
RESULTS DFS HR 95% CI or p
value
OS HR
95% CI or p
value
ALL* 60m
30m
0.68
0.58
P<0.00005
P<0.0004
0.88
0.82
P0.37
P0.3
Node Neg 0.45 (0.27-0.75) NS _
Node Pos
0.61 (0.45-0.84) 0.61 (0.38-0.98)
*Absolute difference in DFS 6%
31. Premenopausal ER+ breast
cancer
38y premenopausal woman post partial
mastectomy for 1.8cm, grade 3, ER 2+, PR-,
her2-, LVI positive, NN ductal cancer
Chemotherapy: determined by recurrence risk
Hormone therapy: if ER and/or PR positive
Clinical predictors for recurrence: grade, LVI, young
age
Clinical predictors for benefit from treatment: ER
(hormone therapy); ?age, grade (chemo)
32. Menopausal case:
68y menopausal woman post mastectomy for 2.7cm,
grade 2, ER3+, PR 3+, her2-, NN ductal
carcinoma.
Co-morbidities HTN, NIDDM, high cholesterol,
overweight
Medications: ramipril; metformin; lipitor
Grade, strong ER/PR, and node negative predict for low
recurrence
Grade, strong ER/PR, age predict for low benefit from
chemo
Age, comorbidities predict for lack of survival benefit from
chemo
33. Consider chemo
~Always
Triple negative (ER,
PR, HER2 negative)
HER2+
Grade 3
<45y and T2+
>3 nodes positive
~Usually
Weak ER positive
Young and 1-3 node
pos
Older, healthy, and 1-3
node pos and other
worry (high grade,
weak ER, LVI…)
34. Anti HER2 therapy
HER2+ breast cancer: more aggressive, high
recurrence rates, very sensitive to chemo/
antiHER2 antibodies
Normal cardiac function: small incidence of
cardiac injury, often reversible
Chemotherapy planned: trivial benefit without
chemo
Standard of care: 1 year of trastuzumab
Future standard of care:
Low risk: 3 months chemo, 1 year trastuzumab
Intermediate risk: 6 months chemo, 1 year
trastuzumab
High risk: 6 months chemo, 1 year trastuzumab,
pertuzumab
35. Chemotherapy timing
Adjuvant = neoadjuvant
Neoadjuvant advantages
Local downstaging (locally advanced)
Tests in vivo sensitivity
37. Node negative
DC or AC or FEC
ER+
Older (>65)
Her2 negative
grade 3 but T1
Cardiac risk (DC)
LVI
Anthracycline +
Taxane
Triple negative
Younger
Her2 positive
Grade 3 but T2+
LVI
38. Node positive
Anthracycline-taxane
BRAJACT-G (needs GCSF) and BRAJACTW (no
GCSF) have the lowest toxicity coupled with best
efficacy
BRAJACT (q3weeks) is antiquated (lower efficacy)
but often given in her2+ so trastuzumab can be
conveniently added to every 3 weeks
BRAJFEC-D is an option, but D (docetaxel) has high
haem toxicity and needs G-CSF
BRLAACD typically used for locally advanced (stage
III) due to higher heam toxicity with D.
39. Node positive
Coverage for GCSF
BRAJACT-G (q2w)
BRAJFECD
BRLAACD
No coverage for
GCSF
BRAJACTW (q1w T)
BRAJACTT (if her2+)
BRAJDCARBT (if
her2+ and cardiac
worry)
40. Anti-her2 therapy
12 months trastuzumab standard of care
Finher
Phare
Addition of pertuzumab or lapatinib
increases pCR in neoadjuvant therapy
Pertuzumab/trastuzumab/chemo approved in
neoadjuvant therapy in US based on
neosphere and gepartquinto studies
41. Adj H trial designs: 1year
TRIAL N DESIGN
NCCTG N9831
3351
N=1616
AC → T q3w
AC → T q3w H qw
(AC → T → H )
NSABP B31
N=1736
AC → 12Tweekly
AC → TH
HERA 3388
(5090)
Chx → observation
Chx → 1y H q3w
Chx → 2y H
BCIRG 006* 3222 AC → D (q3w)
AC → DH
DCH
*D= docetaxel; T= paclitaxel
42. Meta-analysis of adj H trials
Viani G, BMC Cancer 2007
H No H Odds
ratio TR
vs no TR
CI Test for
hetero’y
P value
Mortality,n (%) 217/4555
(6)
392/4562
(8.5)
0.52 .44-.62 .28 <0.0001
Recurrence 400/4555
(8.2)
700/4562
(15.3)
0.53 .46-.6 .36
Cardiac grade
3,4
203/4555
(4.5)
86/4562
(1.8)
2.45 1.89-3.1
6
0.0001
Metastases 276/4555
(6)
497/4562
(10.8)
.34 0.00001
Brain mets 54/3365 30/3773 1.82 .5
Other cancer .33 .15-.74 .16
43. When to start chemo
Wound healed, no ongoing infection
3-10 weeks post surgery is ideal
Reduced benefit if >12 weeks from
surgery
Can defer re-excision of margins,
completion axillary dissection until post
chemo if high risk and result will not
influence chemo choice
44. Venous Access
Typically we avoid the affected arm
Practically, for those with Sentinel node
biopsy, lymphedema risk is only 1-2%, so can
use both arms
Consider port for multiple iv start regimens
Weekly chemo: 16 IV starts over 6 months
HER2+: 21 IV starts over 15 months
Anyone with needle phobia or poor venous access
Epirubicin can sclerose veins; doxorubicin,
cyclophopshamide, and taxanes typically do
not
45. Chemotherapy Side Effects
Educate pts
What to expect
When to expect onset, peak, resolution
When and who to call
46. Hair Loss
Alopecia: all adjuvant chemo regimens for BC
Starts about 2 weeks after first dose
Scalp: ~ 100%
Eyelashes, eyebrows, body hair: Variable but frequent
Most Extended Health Benefits will reimburse wig
Pt needs a signed prescription “for chemo induced alopecia”
Prevention: ice cap and tourniquet
Used in Europe; impractical for infusions >1h (paclitaxel)
Regrowth: 6-8 months to a short crop
No regrowth: subtotal alopecia in 3% of docetaxel
treated pts
47. Nausea and Vomiting
Anthracyclines, iv cyclophosphamide, carboplatin
Acute phase peaks and recedes within 3 days
Often worse in younger pts, pts who have had
morning sickness, are prone to motion sickness
Ondansetron, dexamethasone pre and post dose
Nausea, vomiting despite premeds:
Ongoing: IV hydration and anti-emetics if needed
Next cycle:
add Aprepitant (EMEND) 125mg pre, 80mg day 2, day 3
Ondansetron, dexamethasone IV, +/- ativan
Late nausea: >3 days
Is it heartburn, malaise, constipation, intercurrent illness?
Breakthrough meds: metoclopramide, prochlorperazine
Continue dexamethasone 1-2 days longer
48. Heamatologic effects
Heamatologic
WBC and neutrophils:
Counts drop with all regimens
Least impact with weekly dosing (paclitaxel)
Highest impact with docetaxel
Pt to be assessed for febrile neutropenia if T>38 Celcius
Hemoglobin
Modest drops with anthracyclines, taxanes
Can contribute to fatigue
Transfusion rarely needed
Platelets
Carboplatin
Trastuzumab (rare)
Concurrent G-CSF
G-CSF; dose reduction;
delay
Replace iron if needed,
monitor
Delay; dose reduce;
monitor
49. Peripheral Neuropathy
Numbness, tingling (+/-painful):
sensory (glove, stocking) and motor
Cumulative dose related
Taxanes, carboplatin
Paclitaxel worse than docetaxel
Weekly worse than q3w or q2w dosing
Often worse for several months after chemo ends
Small % permanent
Monitor for function loss, or pain
Dose reduce; stop; gabapentin
50. Cardiac
Anthracyclines
Cumulative dose related
Dilated cardiomyopathy
Older pt, cardiac co-morbidity
Baseline LVEF if at risk
Usually irreversible
Myocyte damage by
oxygen radicals
Not safe to rechallenge
Standard CHF, low LVEF
management (ACE-I/ARB;
B-block; diuretics;
conditioning)
Trastuzumab
Dose independent, often
early
Dilated cardiomyopathy
Older pt, borderline
function
Baseline LVEF in all
Usually reversible/partly
rev
Idiosyncratic, mechanism
unknown
Algorhythm in protocols to
continue, stop, rechallenge
based on evolving LVEF,
symptoms
Standard CHF, low LVEF
management
51. Mucositis (mouth sores)
All drugs, worst with anthracyclines,
cyclophosphamide
Any pt can get mouth sores
Generally confined to mouth, but can get sore
throat
Prophylactic baking soda mouth rinse bid
Magic mouthwash
Thrush overgrowth uncommon
Lower incidence in pts on G-CSF
52. Infusion reactions
Usually during infusion
Many culprit drugs
Taxanes:
Paclitaxel > Docetaxel >>> Abraxane
Anaphylactic, mild-severe spectrum
Stop infusion, steroids, benadryl, ventolin, oxygen, monitor
(epinephrine)
Can often resume at lower infusion rate and complete
Recurrent with future infusions
Pre-medicate future doses with hydrocortisone 100mg iv
Trastuzumab:
first infusion only
Anaphylactoid, generally mild
Can occur during immediate post infusion period
No need to pre-medicate future doses
(ARDS-type rxn in metastatic disease with high lung burden – rare)
53. Menopause, Amenorrhea
Anthracycline, cyclophosphamide total dose and
patient age
AC-T in a 38 yo: 30% menopause 47 yo: 80% menopause
FEC in a 38 yo: 50% menopause 47 yo: 95%
menopause
Affects fertility even without permanent amenorrhea
Embryo banking for young women who want kids
LNMP often in cycle 1, 2
Resumption of menses can take up to 2-3 years
Post treatment Estradiol, LH, FSH levels do not
predict future recovery
For hormone therapy, if premenopausal at Dx, give
tamoxifen, not AI even if amenorrhea from chemo
Better DFS if permanent menopause in ER+ BC
54. Chemo Brain
Mechanism not well understood
Not predictable by patient or regimen
Multifactorial:
Menopause
Fatigue
Depression, worry, anxiety, pre-occupation
Poor sleep
Chemo
multi-tasking, short-term memory,
concentration fatigue, processing speed
Variable resolution, frequently persistent
55. Nail Changes
Fingers/toes
All drugs but worst with docetaxel, paclitaxel.
Dark lines, splitting, lifting, oozing, loosing,
ridges
Frozen gloves with docetaxel very effective
Soak in warm salt water if oozing
Changes resolve slowly (months)
56. Myalgias, Arthralgias
During chemo:
Taxanes: paclitaxel q3w > weekly > docetaxel
Days 3-7
Gapabentin; tylenol; opioids
recurrent
G-CSF: usually lessens with subsequent dosing
After chemo:
Aromatase inhibitor
Rule out unmasked arthritis
Autoimmune / rheumatoid type multi-joint pain
Infrequent ?3%
Occasionally severe enough to need steroids
Usually resolves gradually with no permanent changes to
joints
57. Taste and Weight
Weight gain common:
Steroids
Menopausal changes
Change in routine (not working, less exercise, comfort
eating)
Depression, anxiety alter metabolism
Hormone therapy may alter metabolism
Taste: temporary
“food tastes metallic” “everything is sweet”
“things taste like wood”
“my mouth is so dry I can’t swallow”
58. Work and Chemo
Is it safe to work?
No significant risk to self, co-workers, family
Is it sensible to work?
Multiple appointments
Transient side effects at different times, cumulative
Emotional roller coaster
Decreased physical and mental stamina
When is return to work reasonable?
3-6 months post chemo or radiation (whichever is last)
When hormone therapy side effects adjusted to
Graduated hours return is optimal
Some have lasting fatigue and cannot return to former work level
59. Summary
Majority of women in BC have early stage
and highly curable breast cancer
Treatment is multi-disciplinary (surgery,
radiation, hormone, chemo, antiHER2)
A few side effects are permanent or long
lasting, most are temporary
Women need support through treatment
(anxiety, menopausal symptoms, body
image, depression, loss of control)