1. Welcome to Green Framing Options Presenter: Wally Geer go2wallyworld@hotmail.com
2.
3. Some Sincere Thanks to: The Center for Sustainable Energy U.S. Green Building Council, C4 Chapter National Association of Home Builder’s Research Center University College of Dublin MosArt Architects, Dublin Laura’s Painting, Ojai, CA. Greymar Associates, Ventura, CA. Sonoma State University
4. In Defense of Wood There is an abundant supply of vendors and subcontractors It has relatively few design & structural constraints It’s cost effective It’s beautiful
5. Why Chose an AlternativeFraming System ? Site & Structural Constraints Health Related Issues Environmental Concerns Energy Efficiency Life Cycle Value Fire Safety Competitive Advantage
6. Site & Structural Constraints Lack of Staging Area Complex topography that will not allow conventional movement of building materials Unique Soils of Geological Conditions Short Building Season
7. Health Related Issues Mold Building Material Toxins Specific Health Issues of the Occupants Healthier Families & Higher Workplace Productivity
8. Environmental Concerns Concerns over renewable resources Concerns over “Cradle to Cradle” or “Cradle to Grave” issues Concerns related to “Carbon Footprint” Concerns over material waste and Land Fill waste
9. Energy Efficiency “Tight” Building Envelope Passive Solar Design Benefits Life Cycle Energy Savings High Performance Building Assemblies
10. Life Cycle Value “Life Cycle Value” is the total Cost of INITIAL CONSTUCTION + ENERGY CONSUMPTION COSTS over the functional life of a building
11. Cost Comparison Construction Costs of a 50% ZEB Office Building, Kiel, Germany(Building Shell + Tenant Improvements - Converted to U.S. Dollars) Conventional Sustainable Difference Frame 48.28 53.82 11.46% Envelope 83.65 101.27 21.06% Roof 15.20 15.11 -0.58% Walls/Doors 12.78 12.90 0.95% Finishes 33.48 32.24 -3.70% Services 92.18 86.64 -6.01% Site works 7.04 7.02 -0.37% TOTALS 292.62 309.00 5.60%
12. Energy Savings Office Building Type Energy Conventional 25 KWH/ft2/year Sustainable 10 KWH/ft2/year Savings 15 KWH/ft2/year For a 250,000 Office Building, that’s a Savings of over $350,000 per year
13. Fire Safety Desire to have a “Fire Safe” home Lower Insurance Rates Higher resale value in “Fire Country”
15. Why NOT to chose an Alternative Framing System Lower Initial Cost of Structural Shell Construction Because you can gain “LEED Credits” If there are limited options in your market area of suppliers or qualified subcontractors Because your flaky unlicensed Brother-in-Law claims he is knowledgeable of straw bale construction
17. When evaluating Building Envelope Assemblies, consider: Structural System Adaptability of Floor & Roof Diaphragms Exterior Building Skin Interior Building Skin Insulation Adaptability of Plumbing & Electrical within the system Design & Structural Constraints of the Assembly
18. When comparing Options, consider Design & Structural Constraints Energy Efficiency Environmental Attributes Initial Construction Cost Life Cycle Value Fire Safety Adaptability of Building Skin Options Adaptability of Electrical & Plumbing Availability of Raw Materials Availability of Qualified Labor & Subcontractors
19. What are the Options Conventional Wood Framing FSC Certified Wood Framing Light Gauge Steel Framing Red Iron Steel Framing Structurally Insulated Panels (aka “SIPs”) Insulated Concrete Forms (aka “ICFs”) Timber Frame Structural Systems Straw Bale Construction
20. Conventional Wood Framing Positive Attributes: There is an abundant supply of vendors and subcontractors Relatively few design & structural constraints It’s cost effective Potential Problems: Rot, Mold & Termites Low Fire Resistance In consistent Quality
28. Light Gauge Steel Framing Potential Negative Attributes : More costly than wood framing Limited number Requires an knowledgeable architectural & engineering team of qualified subcontractors Potential problems with other trades (M, P & E) Requires a knowledgeable architectural & engineering team
35. Red Iron Steel Framing Positive Attributes: Excellent structural characteristics Readily Available Material Eliminates the possibility of termite damage Highly Environmentally Friendly* Partially mitigates potential mold problems Can be potentially very cost effective
36. Red Iron Steel Framing Potential Negative Attributes : Potential problems with other trades (M, P & E) Some Design constraints Potential Thermal Bridging Problems
43. Structurally Insulated Panels(aka “SIPs”) Positive Attributes: Excellent structural characteristics Highly Energy Efficient Highly adaptable for future alterations Substantially mitigates the possibility of termite damage Highly Environmentally Friendly* Substantially mitigates potential mold problems* Excellent Quality Control due to factory production
119. Closing Comments There no one magic solution to any building design Do your homework, pick wisely Respect “single source vendors”, but take them with a grain of salt. After all, they have a hammer Appreciate that a building’s structural shell is only one working component within a synergistic whole Have fun & on behalf of the Center for Sustainable Energy, THANK YOU FOR BEING HERE TODAY