To celebrate the launch of the 2019 Reporting matters, CDSB, WBCSD and Radley Yeldar will discuss the main findings of the report and what it means for corporate reporting moving forward.
Webinar: Reporting Matters 2019 - The State of Play
1. November 19 | Tweet @CDSBGlobal
Reporting Matters Webinar:
The State of Play in 2019
Moderated by:
Lesley McKenna, Climate Disclosure Standards Board
Andy Beanland,
Director, Redefining Value,
WBCSD
Ashleigh Gay
Director of Sustainability Strategy
Radley Yeldar
Austin Kennedy,
Manager, Redefining Value,
WBCSD
David Astley,
Senior Technical Officer,
CDSB
2. As global business faces new and complex
challenges and opportunities, our science-
based approach and targeted business
solutions aim to scale up business impact.
WBCSD’s Approach
We target the realization of the Sustainable
Development Goals (SDGs) through six work
programs to achieve systems transformation.
2
3. Business decision-making Investor decision-makingExternal disclosure
We aim to improve internal processes to
incorporate hidden costs and benefits as they
relate to environmental, social and governance
(ESG) issues
Projects:
• Enterprise Risk Management
• Governance & Internal Oversight
• Assess & Manage Performance (upcoming):
• Measurement & Valuation
• Integrated Performance Management
We help companies communicate decision-
useful information on growth prospects,
risks and how both are managed for a more
accurate valuation by market participants
Projects:
• Reporting matters
• The Reporting Exchange
• Purpose-driven Disclosure
• Assurance & Internal Controls
• TCFD Preparer Forums
We help companies demonstrate the
investment case for inclusive, sustainable
business practices to their internal teams and
external stakeholders, help them take
advantage of emerging financing mechanisms,
and mobilize their own investments
Project:
• Aligning Retirement Assets
We have created solutions
4. We exist to create a
world that believes
in business.
Ashleigh Gay
Director of Sustainability Strategy
RY x WBCSD x CDSB
5. 5RY x WBCSD x CDSB
Our sustainability offer
Sustainability
strategy
Sustainability
reporting
Sustainability
engagement
We combine
sustainability
expertise with
creative
communications to
drive real change.
32
years’ experience
100
+
awards in 2018
220
experts
107
clients
6. November 19 | Tweet @CDSBGlobal
To provide decision-useful environmental
information to markets via the mainstream
corporate report
7. November 19 | Tweet @CDSBGlobal
CDSB vision
Companies reporting climate change and
environmental information with the same rigour,
quality, and value as financial information.
This facilitates a world whereby decisions and actions
contribute to more sustainable economic, social and
environmental systems.
9. | redefining value www.reportingexchange.com
WBCSD collaboration with CDSB
The Reporting Exchange is the global resource for sustainability reporting.
We aim to
Help business understand what, where
and how to report sustainability
information; and
Provide the evidence base for
harmonization and alignment of corporate
reporting on ESG.
The platform covers 71 countries and
2000+ reporting provisions making it
the most complete source of
information on ESG disclosure
requirements.
Winner of
ISAR Honors
Award 2018
10. 10
Reporting matters
WBCSD analyzes the fullest source of sustainability information from
each member each year against a framework and uses the resulting
data in two ways:
• For members: We provide confidential scoring dashboards with
analysis and anonymized peer group data. We offer confidential
feedback sessions to explain our findings to all members.
• For the public: We compile the overall results and publish an
annual overview of reporting trends within our membership,
showcasing good practice examples and providing high level
recommendations on reporting.
WBCSD developed Reporting matters in partnership with Radley Yeldar to help improve the effectiveness of
sustainability reporting.
You can learn more in our 2019 publication and access past publications and additional resources online.
11. November 19 | Tweet @CDSBGlobal
Producing Reporting Matters.
12. 12
The evaluation framework
We seek a holistic view of the primary source of ESG disclosure that considers a range of audience needs.
The framework has 18 indicators that contribute to the overall score plus an additional SDG indicator that
does not contribute to the overall score.
13. RY x WBCSD x CDSB
Corporate reporting is
the most trusted
source of information
13
But, only 1 in 10
people read reports in
detail
14. 14
Reporting matters
looks at the role of
experience in
reporting.
Accessibility
Story &
messaging
Navigation &
flow
Compelling
design
16. 16
Key findings
Spanning 159 leading companies from 19 supersectors and 34 countries, this year’s research points to
continued progress in corporate environmental, social and governance (ESG) reporting and disclosure as well as
a continued movement towards digital reporting.
17. RY x WBCSD x CDSB 17
12% average
improvement in
experience overall
Plenty of room for
improvement on
story and messaging
23% of members
provide a digital
reporting experience
18. RY x WBCSD x CDSB 18
Downloadable PDF
remains the most
common reporting
format.
Of those who have
digital content, 72%
are using video,
audio and other
interactive elements.
1/3 of all reports
reviewed have
customizable
content.
19. 19
Digital deep dive
• First, it impacts the process of producing,
aggregating and analyzing sustainability
data internally (horizontal axis).
• Secondly, it impacts how companies are
communicating their sustainability
approach to external audiences (vertical
axis).
Sustainability reporting and technology
are converging. This convergence impacts
companies in two ways.
You can learn more in the Digital deep dive.
21. 21
How we incorporated the SDGs
Our evaluation framework has 18 indicators that contribute to the overall score plus an additional SDG
indicator that does not contribute to the overall score but does appear on personalized scoring dashboards
sent to each member company.
o Prioritize specific SDGs
o Align priority SDGs with strategy,
materiality, value chain impacts at
a target level
o Use case studies to demonstrate
evidence of activities
o Demonstrate executive leadership
o Measure contributions to priority
SDGs using KPIs and SMART
targets.
Refined approach
o Reviewed 159 members
sustainability, integrated or
combined reports and scored on a
0 to 4 scale using the SDG criteria.
o About 80 feedback sessions
planned or executed in FY19 to
date.
Reviewed reports and feedback
o Conducted additional data
collection and analysis to inform
ways to integrate the SDGs into
the evaluation framework moving
forward.
Additional data collection
22. 22
SDGs findings
Nearly all (96%) of reports reviewed reference the
SDGs
The vast majority of members reference specific
goals in their report (84%).
There remains significant regional variations in
reporting activities related to the SDGs.
• 20% discuss Target-level SDG information
• 47% reference SDGs in leadership statements
• About a quarter reference a prioritization process that ties
to strategy and the materiality assessment
• Reports rarely align key performance indicators
• Very few make reference to Enterprise Risk Management
and human rights in relation to the SDGs
23. November 19 | Tweet @CDSBGlobal
Harmonisation & Alignment.
24. November 19 | Tweet @CDSBGlobal
What we set out to do
Why?
•Effective disclosure of ESG information key to catalysing
capital allocations towards sustainable future
•ESG reporting landscape confused and impeding
disclosure – growing number of calls for harmonisation
•Key question, though, is where do we start?
24
Explore and attempt to understand the current state of alignment
25. November 19 | Tweet @CDSBGlobal
What we have done
25
Analysed a wealth of data captured by different WBCSD projects
Reporting
Exchange
Indicator
Library
Reporting
matters
Over 1000 reporting
requirements from
60 countries
Over 1000 unique
indicators from nine
key standards
Over 2500 material
disclosed by nearly
150 companies
26. November 19 | Tweet @CDSBGlobal
What we found
• Evidence of agreement between regulators, standard setters and companies on 30
key ESG issues
–Basis for improving the reporting landscape
• Identified 10 further emergent issues from corporate disclosures
–Areas for development work by regulators and standard setters
• Considerable agreement between these 40 ESG issues and existing
research/methods
–Particularly pronounced from investor perspective
• Evidence of alignment is, however, surface level
–Regulation and indicators diverge between themselves in terms of methods,
scope and applicability
26
There is alignment on key ESG issues – “30 + 10”
27. November 19 | Tweet @CDSBGlobal
27
Environmental
Biodiversity
Efficiency
Energy use
Forests*
GHG emissions
Incidents
Other effluents
Other emissions
Renewables
Resource reuse/recycling
Resource sourcing
Resource use
Social
Compensation and benefits
Diversity*
Employee health & safety
Engagement*
Engagement and consultation*
Fair disclosure, marketing and
advertising
Health & safety
Human rights*
Other services and benefits
Privacy and security*
Quality*
Recruitment and retention
Satisfaction*
Training and development
Governance
Anti-corruption and bribery
Financial and business reporting
Political contributions
Regulatory and legal challenges
Risk management and internal
control
Economic
Business model and innovation*
Supply chain*
Cont.
Treatment and discharge
Treatment, disposal and storage
Waste reuse/recycling
Waste type
Water quality
Water reuse/recycling
Water use
28. November 19 | Tweet @CDSBGlobal
What this means
Regulators and standard setters
• Comparable and representative
requirements for 30 key issues
• Clearly aligned methods and metrics
• Consistency in channel of disclosure
and approach to company
applicability
• Update requirements to better
represent 10 emergent issues
identified by companies
28
Calls to action for regulators and standard setters, companies and investors
Companies
• Ensure materiality is central to
reporting
• Use standards and frameworks
appropriately and effectively
• Use existing aligned indicators
Investors
• Clearly communicate what is most
valuable in decision-making
29. November 19 | Tweet @CDSBGlobal
Sustainability Strategies.
30. 30
Strategy & targets deep dive
• Among companies that defined strategy expiration, 2020
was a more common expiration date with companies
headquartered in North America (64%) and Europe (58%).
• In Asia (29%) and Latin America (25%), more companies
have strategies set to expire later, typically 2025 or 2030.
• North American headquartered companies were the least
likely to provide details of a future strategy with just a
third of companies doing so, despite having the highest
levels of strategy expiring by 2020.
We also collected a range of data alongside our standard
review process to provide a snapshot of the current state
of reporting on strategy and targets – and to consider
what is to come.
You can learn more in the Strategy & targets deep dive.
31. RY x WBCSD x CDSB 31
Of the companies
that define the
expiration date of
their strategy, 51%
expire in 2020
62% of companies
show the link
between their
sustainability
strategy and their
business model
27% of companies
link their
sustainability
strategy to their
purpose
33. November 19 | Tweet @CDSBGlobal
Questions?
Andy Beanland,
Director, Redefining Value,
WBCSD
beanland@wbcsd.org
Ashleigh Gay
Director of Sustainability Strategy
Radley Yeldar
A.Gay@ry.com
Austin Kennedy,
Manager, Redefining Value,
WBCSD
Kennedy@wbcsd.org
David Astley,
Senior Technical Officer,
CDSB
David.Astley@cdsb.net
With the contribution of the LIFE Programme of the European Union.
Hosted by CDP Europe.
Notes de l'éditeur
To start of the discussion, I think it would be beneficial for our audience to hear a brief overview of each of the organisations. Andy over to you.
For those of you that haven’t heard of RY, we are an integrated communications agency with a dedicated sustainability practice
At the start of the year we launched our new vision which is to help create a world that believes in business which fits nicely with what we do in sustainability
[Change slide]
Our sustainability practice covers three areas of sustainability including strategy, reporting and engagement campaigns and to do this work we draw on the creative and digital
And in the last twelve months we’ve worked for clients including The Lego Group, VF Corporation, Mondi and more.
At Climate Disclosure Standards Board CDSB, we have been thinking about how to integrate climate risk and opportunity into the annual report and accounts with the same rigour as financial information since 2007.
CDSB was set up in Davos at the World Economic Forum in the absence of a globally accepted accounting framework for climate-related financial disclosures by a visionary group of business and environmental NGOs that saw the link between climate change and financial performance.
Our mission is to provide decision useful environmental information to markets via the mainstream corporate report. We achieve this by offering a companies the CDSB framework to report this information.
Here you can see our vision which ultimately boils down to making sure that decisions and actions contribute to more sustainable economic, social and environmental systems.
Before, we dive into Reporting matters, I’m sure our audience are keen to understand how all three organisations work together. ANDY How did WBCSD’s relationship with CDSB come about and why WBCSD start reporting matters?
Austin and Ashleigh, to produce Reporting matters, you analyse sustainability, integrated or combined reports from your member companies and also look at report experience and why it’s important. Can you tell us more about the process? (2 minutes)
Austin will talk and then direct to Ashleigh:
Each year we work with the Reporting matters team to ensure the criteria reflects best practice which results in some incremental changes to the criteria each year
We also work with the team to do cross checks on the scoring and join a handful of the feedback sessions with WBCSD members
In 2017 we overhauled the experience criteria to reflect the growing demand for sustainability information from generalist and specialist audiences and the need to adapt reporting to reflect this
If we move to the next slide, I’ll explain why it’s important to consider the role of experience in reporting
Lesley switch slide.
At RY we recently surveyed over 1000 people with a working interest in corporate reporting to understand what they think about the state of play
This research isn’t launched yet, it’s coming soon, but the key headless show why it’s important to think about the role of experience in reporting
We found that for these people, corporate reporting is the most trusted source of information BUT only 1 in 10 are reading the report in detail….so 90% of people are skim reading
SWITCH SLIDE
I mentioned that in 2017 we revised the criteria which covers 4 areas
Accessibility is about making sure the report is easily accessible to as many people as possible. It considers if the report is easy to find on a company website and if a range of formats are used to support the main report for example video, infographics etc
Story and messaging is about the overarching red thread throughout the report. If 90% of people are skim-reading reports, what’s the overarching message you want them to take away? We find that defining this message at the start of a reporting process makes for a much smoother project for reporting teams and a better quality product at the end
Navigation and flow looks at does the report unfold in a logical order – so is there a clear line of sight between the outside world, how its impacting a company and the relative performance….we also look to make sure the report is easy to navigate for the people that are coming for a specific piece of data or information
And finally, compelling design…so much time and effort goes into the data and content in reports but the best reports use design to help tell the story. Ultimately, the design should reflect the brand and support the content and the overarching message…
Very interesting. Now let’s talk about this years report. Austin and Ashleigh,
What were the key headlines from the 2019 findings? (5 minutes) –
Austin and set up for Ashleigh by indicating that Ashleigh will speak to the next slide
Ashleigh –
Across the experience criteria this year we found that there was a 12% improvement in experience overall
There’s still plenty of room for improvement on story and messaging which is one of the hardest areas to get right
We also found that 23% of members are providing a digital reporting experience
Digital reporting is an area that’s intrigued the team for some time so this year we produced a separate digital deep dive report to see how this is playing out across member companies
SWITCH SLIDE
Ash – found in digital
We found that the downloadable PDF remains the most common reporting format which reflects the need to have one source of the truth when it comes to reporting
Of those who have digital content, 72% are using video, audio and other interactive elements
A third of all reports reviewed have some sort of customisable content showing that reporting is no longer a one-way communication activity
I’ll pass over now to Austin who is going to provide further context around our digital deep dive
Austin, To what extent to you look to see how companies are integrating SDGs into their reporting? (5 minutes)
SDG criteria was included on the Reporting matters dashboard for the first time in 2018.
In 2018, we received significant feedback from members, so for 2019 we refined our approach to focus on the following
Prioritize specific SDGs for your company based on a thorough analysis of how your organization has the potential to contribute to the realization of this agenda both through enhancing positive impacts and mitigating negative impacts on people and planet;
Align priority SDGs with strategy, materiality and value chain impacts – preferably at a target level;
Use concise, outcome-driven case studies to demonstrate evidence of activities and collaboration;
Demonstrate clear executive leadership in driving the SDG agenda; and
Measure your concrete contribution to key SDGs using KPIs and specific, measurable, achievable, realistic and time-bound (SMART) targets.
Nearly all reports reviewed reference the SDGs in some way.
Vast majority reference specific goals
Typically, six to 10 Goals are referenced (35% of reports). Less than a third of reports (29%) prioritize five or fewer Goals.
For the third straight year, the most commonly referenced Goals were SDG 13 (87%), 12 (81%) and 8 (76%). Goals 14 (32%), 1 (34%), 16 (38%), 2 (41%) and 10 (41%) continue to be underrepresented, relative to the others.
Significant regional variation in reporting activities related to the SDGs
European HQ’d companies are twice as likely to score 3 or 4 than Asian or American HQ’d companies.
Of those that reference SDGs:
20% discuss Target-level SDG information, with the remainder of disclosures focusing on Goal-level information.
47% include them in leadership statements, but only 20% of these leadership statements provide detailed discussion on the SDGs.
About a quarter reference a prioritization process (26%), ties to strategy (25%) and ties to the materiality assessment process (24%).
Reports rarely align key performance indicators (KPIs) (6%) and targets (15%) to the SDGs.
Very few (1-2%) make reference to Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) and human rights in relation to the SDGs.
Broad conclusions
1. Companies are still getting to grips with how they look to strategically integrate and communicate around the SDG agenda
Now if we turn the conversation to the research with CDSB on regarding harmonisation and alignment. David, could you tell us what you think is a suitable approach for alignment of the reporting landscape? (5 minutes) – David
Sustainability strategies are expiring in 2020. Austin and Ashleigh, what are their strategies beyond that? Have they defined their strategies beyond that and where are the opportunities? (5 minutes) – Austin
Austin to indicate next slide and set up for Ashleigh to comment on opportunities
When we look to where the opportunities ahead for companies – the big focus is on action. We have limited time left to get this right so we must see change
In our experience, this comes down to how well integrated the strategy is into the core business, the culture and
This year we found that more than half of companies show the link between their sustainability strategy and their business model
And, less than a third are showing how this ladders up to an overarching purpose beyond making money for shareholders
And that brings us to the final section on recommendations for reporting improvement. Just a reminder that we will host Q&A with our experts after this so please do continue to put your questions in the chat function.
Now back to the recommendations.
Andy, Ashleigh, Austin, David it would be great if you could succinctly summarise your suggestions for improving corporate reporting practices. Andy, perhaps you can start us off with your recommendations for governance and risk.
Andy – Governance and RiskAustin – Assurance, MaterialityAsh – Strategy, DigitalDavid – Alignment / Indicators / TCFD
RY - How can companies balance communications challenges of specialists and generalists who are not so focussed on the detail?
General - What are the first steps a company could take to develop the strategy post 2020?