This document outlines an organizing framework for social accountability. Social accountability relies on civic engagement and operationalizes direct accountability relationships between citizens and the state. It aims to improve the enabling environment for citizen engagement in governance and public decision-making. This is done by increasing the capacity of the state to respond to public needs through effective oversight and redress. It also improves the capability of citizens to engage in governance and enhances the capacity of social intermediaries to provide effective participation and oversight. The framework focuses on transparency, participation, and collaboration between government, citizens, and civil society as key conditions for social accountability.
Presentation_Jurczynska - Catalyzing Investments in RMNCAH at the Community L...
Understanding Social Accountability and Citizen Engagement
1. Understanding
Social Accountability
“an approach towards building accountability that
relies on civic engagement”
**
Operationalizes direct accountability relationships between citizens
and the state.
2. Improve enabling environment for
citizen engagement in governance
and public decision-making
State
Politicians /
Policymakers
Independent
Accountability
Agencies
Increase capacity of state to
respond to public needs and
effective oversight and
redress
Opening contracts
and citizen
monitoring of
procurement
Citizens/Clients
Formal and Informal
Social
Intermediaries
Improve capability
of citizens to engage
in governance
Client Power
Providers/Agencies
Enhance capacity of social
intermediaries to provide effective
participation and oversight (to
inform, monitor, and improve
service provision)
Willingness & Capacity to Demand
(political, socio-cultural, legal, and economic factors)
Willingness & Capacity to Respond and Account
(political, socio-cultural, legal, and economic factors)
Focus on citizen engagement in accountability
relationships
2
3. Organizing Framework for
SOCIAL ACCOUNTABILITY
Transparency
Participation
Collaboration
Openness,
accessibility of
government at all
levels.
Stakeholder
influence and
control. Ensures
ownership,
sustainability, risk
mitigation, public
support of
reforms
mechanisms for
answerability and
collaborative
action
Demystifying and
visualizing budget
data; Disclosure
mechanisms; Access to
Information;
stakeholder capacity
building for users
Support for nonexecutive
participation and
monitoring
- Parliaments
- Media
- CSOs
ACCOUNTABILITY
Joint solutions
Multi-stakeholder
coalitions
Collaborative
leadership teams
ANSA Arab world
4. Conditions for Social Accountability
Legal Framework
Bridging
mechanisms
• Negotiation: Effective
•Transparency and
Disclosure: pro-actively
disclose and disseminate
information to citizens /
Maximize citizen access
to publicly held
information (ATI laws)
Information
Government
Civil Society
engagement to create
avenues for negotiating and
for channeling citizen
feedback to government
(dialogues and consultations
on procurement reform
along with mechanisms for
resolving disagreements).
Political
conditions
Technology
• Monitor: monitoring and
oversight of the public sector
through mixed methods (social
audits; procurement
monitoring, independent
budget and policy analysis
• Information from this will
inform stakeholder demand –
and the cycle continues.
• Response: Actions
Government
Society
Voice
Strengthened Capacity of
Government and Civil Society
for SA
to respond specifically
to expressed demand
(procurement
monitoring reports);
incentives to public
officials linked to how
they respond.
5. Why this is Important
• Transformations in the social
contract
•
Potential for citizen-led, evidencedriven reforms and pro-poor
expenditure
•
Alternative sources of analysis and
data, e.g. from service delivery
•
Opportunity presented by
information technology
•
Emerging global consensus
6. Our Session’s End Game!
1. Understand the importance of social accountability as an
essential element of advancing international health and
development
2. Be familiar with three approaches currently used to improve
social accountability
3. Articulate at least one means of evaluating social accountability
Notes de l'éditeur
At the core of social accountability is the agency of non-state actors: citizens, civil society organizations, media and other forms. It can be initiated by non-state actors, or even by government. But even when initiated by government, for example Porto Alegre participatorybudgeting grand experiment, for their to be ‘social accountability’, there has to be citizen engagement.While it has some way to go to prove its efficacy on government accountability and performance, social accountability makes both good business (what can guarantee success more than ‘customer’ monitoring and feedback?), and good politics (the promise of public participation for accountability has an appeal to votersl?)WBG: SA is about affirming and operationalizing direct accountability relationships between citizens and the state. A broad range of actions beyond voting that citizens can use to hold the state to account, as well as actions on the part of government, civil society, media and other societal actors that promote or facilitate these efforts. Traditionally, SA included actions such as: Public demonstrations; Protests; Advocacy campaigns; Investigative journalism; Public interest lawsuits
Traditionally citizens have relied on putting pressure on policy makers and politicians to get services delivered or improve services. They did this through advocacy initiatives. It was the long route because it relied on policy makers then putting pressure on service providers, to enforce the ‘compact’ between them. Social accountability is about ‘client power’; direct pressure by citizens on the providers of services. Yet, today, another type of action is taking place: opening up of public procurement, so that contracts are transparent, and the procurement of public services is scrutinized by citizens. The state needs to create an enabling environment; it also needs capacity to respond, and address grievances brought by the citizens. Social accounability requires strong effort to support government’s business processes for responding.Citizen participation is facilitated by intermediary mechanisms, formal CSOs, or informal groups, who should both help to improve citizens capacity to engage, and also to channel their voices. When called for, CSOs also represent citizens.
But social accountability depends on two interlocking features: Transparency, and Participation. TRANSPARENCY requires supply side actions to open up government to citizens – government data, e.g. budget, and processes, e.g. public procurement. WBI’s BOOST helps to demystify and visualize government expenditure data, making it accessible to users. Transparency also requires government enacting right to information legislation, which provides for procedures which citizens can follow, and recourse when public officials are not cooperating. It also requires public disclosure mechanisms that are mandated by law e.g. asset disclosure and conflict of interest.PARTICIPATION gives stakeholders influence government processes. Participation is more than receiving information; it is more than dialogue; it gives great say in the conduct of public affairs, and a measure of control over such things as setting of priorities, making of policies, or creation and implementation of budgets. Participation is good for ownership, and therefore for sustainability…Even more, it can create supportive constituencies for government reforms, which require public support.These two, TRANSPARENCY and PARTICIPATION work together to produce accountability of government to citizens. But ultimately the goal of accountability is a government which is performing well. And CSOs and other non-state stakeholders can be a very important part of that performance. They can contribute to the diagnosis of problems and challenges, and jointly, with government, work for solutions: be it to problems with delivery bottlenecks and services not reaching the poor; girls discrimination in education; or implementation of conditional cash transfer or subsidy programs,. COLLABORATION or, what one might call, ‘collaborative governance’ is an important part of how we should think about good, effective governance. Increasingly this collaboration is taking the form of COALITIONS comprising reform minded public officials, media, citizens, parliamentarians.