2. How We Got Here
Population Growth
Growth Management & Urban Growth
Boundaries
Past Infrastructure Project Challenges
Sewer Infrastructure Advisory Group
2
3. in the Development of the City of Bend’s
Sewer Collection System
Master Plan
SIAG
9/24/13
US Water Alliance
One Water Leadership Summit
September 2013
Los Angeles, CA
Community
Decision Making
4. INTRODUCING THE CITY OF BEND’S
WASTEWATER COLLECTION SYSTEM
430 miles of sewer mains
90 sewer pumping stations
246 home pumping stations
System contains 4 different types of
collection infrastructure
Collect 6.0 million gallons per day
4
6. 6
EMPIRE ESTATES, GLEN VISTA, NORTH FIRE STATION,
RIM ROCK #1 #2 #4 & #5, RIM ROCK RIDERS, RIVERS EDGE,
IVERHOUSE, SAWYER PARK, SERVICE STATION, WYNDEMERE
SHARED FORCE MAIN CONNECTIONS
Known Issues:
• 5” force main discharges into 8” gravity main
shared with the Holiday Pump Station 6” force
main, causing severe surcharging issues.
• Odor complaints have been received at the
gravity sewer leading into the Wyndemere Pump
Station
Same 8”
line
Holiday
and
Highland
feed to.
9. MASTER PLANNING - TAKE 1
Recommendation: shift
to gravity conveyance
Major interceptors to
reduce demand on city
core
Intent was on alleviating
problem areas
Capacity issues
addressed
Improved access for
unsewered areas 9
12. COMMUNITY INVITED TO
HELP SOLVE THE PROBLEMS
Sewer Infrastructure
Advisory Group:
– 17-member citizen
committee
– Appointed by Bend City
Council
– Advise master planning
12
13. THE ASSIGNMENT
Develop “affordable” collection system
capital improvements for existing UGB
Provide flexibility to accommodate long
term growth
Build comprehensive hydraulic model
from updated GIS data
Collect dry and wet weather flow
monitoring
Calibrate the hydraulic model
Incorporate system condition
information into the overall analysis
13
“The Council
desires to engage
in a more
comprehensive
planning process
for its wastewater
collection
system…”
—Resolution 2875
14. THE ASSIGNMENT CONT.
Identify suite of immediate term solutions before all
analysis tools are fully developed
Ensure those immediate term solutions support long
term solutions
Consider a wide range of improvement concepts and
options, including previously recommended solutions
as well as new, innovative ideas
Utilize a formalized optimization process that evaluates
full life cycle costs
14
15. CHALLENGES
Some projects from original master plan
already underway
Immediate solutions needed for several
priority areas to allow growth to continue
High level of community involvement /
public interest / scrutiny
15
17. MASTER PLANNING
WITH EVERYONE INVOLVED
17
Traditional Master Planning Bend’s Master Plan
Focus on engineering
solutions
Focus on community values,
then engineering solutions
Planning assumptions taken
at face-value
Every assumption scrutinized
Solution set limited Solution set expanded
Day-to-day approvers: City
Staff
Approvers: community
members / City Staff / City
Council
No special decision making
modeling
Optimization Modeling
20. OPTIMIZATION BENEFITS
Ability to evaluate thousands of possible
options
– Transparent
– Identifies lowest life cycle cost solutions
– Identifies only solutions that provide capacity
Unbiased when compared to traditional
planning methods
Opportunity to look for savings and prioritize
investment
20
21. SEWER INFRASTRUCTURE
ADVISORY COMMITTEE
How is this different from other committee
panels?
– Depth of involvement
– Scope of decision making
– Amount of investment
– Selection of diverse members
Where are we now?
21