SlideShare une entreprise Scribd logo
1  sur  35
Property of Miami-Dade County Public Schools. Rev. 02/06/2006
Dr. Kriner Cash, Chief
Accountability and Systemwide Performance
and
Mr. Carlos A. Viera, Executive Director
Office of Performance Improvement
Miami-Dade County Public Schools
Property of Miami-Dade County Public Schools. Rev. 02/06/2006
 Session Objectives
 On Philosophy, Vision and Culture
 Key Concepts
 M-DCPS’ Top Accomplishments of 2004-2005
 M-DCPS’ Top Priorities for 2005-2006
 School Improvement Zone (SIZ)
Outcome Data 2004-2005
 District Dashboard
 Performance Scorecards
PRESENTATION OVERVIEW
Property of Miami-Dade County Public Schools. Rev. 02/06/2006
Session Objectives
• Reinforce critical knowledge and understanding about
the kind of leadership, resources, and systems thinking
required to turn around performance in underperforming
schools.
• Describe core processes and tools that must be
sharpened and/or re-designed in order for organizational
results to improve from good to better to best.
• Provide key strategies for increasing graduation rates
and decreasing retention among the District’s minority
groups.
• Highlight processes for increasing the percentages of
underrepresented minorities in advanced academic
coursework.
 
Property of Miami-Dade County Public Schools. Rev. 02/06/2006
Key Concepts
• Knowledge Management
• Value Triangle
• Cascading Accountability
• Sustainability
• Market Branding
• Post-Unitary Commitments
Property of Miami-Dade County Public Schools. Rev. 02/06/2006
Systems Thinking
Breakthrough
2010
and
Beyond
2004
Efficiency
&
Sustainability
Equity
Quality
Stability
Repair & Upgrade
Property of Miami-Dade County Public Schools. Rev. 02/06/2006
Property of Miami-Dade County Public Schools. Rev. 02/06/2006
Organizational Alignment
Property of Miami-Dade County Public Schools. Rev. 02/06/2006
Top Accomplishments
of 2004-2005
1. Schools receiving an “A” from the state grew to 138 (41%
of 334 schools) from 103 (31%) – the highest number ever
– despite tougher state standards, and schools receiving a
repeat “F” were reduced to 3 from 9 – a 66% reduction.
2. Third graders considered proficient readers rose to 61%
from 57% - the highest ever, and 1,814 fewer 3rd graders
are at risk of being held back because of reading scores.
3. Chronically low-performing schools (39) were placed in a
“School Improvement Zone” with an extended school day
and year, a common reading program, and mandatory
teacher training; 80% of these schools registered
performance gains in the state accountability system – with
40% improving enough to raise their state grade.
4. All employees received an average 3% raise using a $44
million negotiating reserve carved from the existing budget.
5. Designed a structure for an integrated approach to
addressing our “Post-Unitary Commitment to Equity and
Diversity.”
Property of Miami-Dade County Public Schools. Rev. 02/06/2006
Top Accomplishments
of 2004-2005
6. Reorganization of central office eliminated more than
500 positions, freeing up $38 million for other
educational needs.
7. Constructed 18,000 new student seats to address
overcrowding – more than three times the number
planned by the prior administration.
8. First comprehensive five-year capital plan was
developed, identifying $3.3 billion in needs.
9. First comprehensive five-year Information Technology
Blueprint was commissioned by the School Board at a
cost of $90 million, identifying and aligning priority
system processes.
10. Bond rating firms improved their official outlook for M-
DCPS based on the administration’s management of
the District’s finances, including a 50% increase in the
“rainy day” fund.
Property of Miami-Dade County Public Schools. Rev. 02/06/2006
M-DCPS’ Top Priorities
for 2005-2006
• Launch Secondary School Reform
• Continue strong literacy emphasis
• Build 20,000 new student seats
• Pilot incentive pay performance plan
for administrators
• Launch Parent Academy
• Improve customer service and
satisfaction
Property of Miami-Dade County Public Schools. Rev. 02/06/2006
EQUTY
&
D V E R S I T YI
A d v a n c e d , H o n o rs, A d v a n c e d
P la c e m e n t C o u rs e s, a n d G ift e d E d u c a tio n
2 0 0 2 - 2 0 0 3 A c a d e m ic Ye a r
R e t e n tio n a n d G ra d u a tio n
2 0 0 1 - 2 0 0 2 a n d 2 0 0 2 - 2 0 0 3
R e v is e d 9 / 2 0 0 5
M i a m i - D a d e C o u n t y P u b l i c S c h o o l s
P o s t - U n i t a r y C o m m i t m e n t s t o
E q u i t y a n d D i v e r s i t y
Integrated Approach to
Achieving Our……
Property of Miami-Dade County Public Schools. Rev. 02/06/2006
Property of Miami-Dade County Public Schools. Rev. 02/06/2006
School Improvement Zone
2004-2005
Academic Achievement Outcomes
READING
Percent of schools decreasing
their number of students in
Level 1
Percent of schools increasing
their number of students in
Levels 3-5
Zone Schools 76 84
District 84 82
MATHEMATICS
Percent of schools decreasing
their number of students in
Level 1
Percent of schools increasing
their number of students in
Levels 3-5
Zone Schools 95 95
District 90 88
* Data from the Office of Assessment and Data Analysis
Property of Miami-Dade County Public Schools. Rev. 02/06/2006
W
h
ite
H
isp
a
n
ic
B
la
ck
W
h
ite
H
isp
a
n
ic
B
la
ck
W
h
ite
H
isp
a
n
ic
B
la
ck
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
2004 2005
Grades 3-5 Grades 6-8 Grades 9-10Grades 3-5 Grades 6-8 Grades 9-10
School Improvement Zone
Percent of Students
Scoring Levels 3-5 by Ethnicity
Reading
* Data from the Office of Assessment and Data Analysis
Property of Miami-Dade County Public Schools. Rev. 02/06/2006
W
h
ite
H
isp
a
n
ic
B
la
ck
W
h
ite
H
isp
a
n
ic
B
la
ck
W
h
ite
H
isp
a
n
ic
B
la
ck
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
2004 2005
Grades 3-5 Grades 6-8 Grades 9-10Grades 3-5 Grades 6-8 Grades 9-10
Mathematics
School Improvement Zone
Percent of Students
Scoring Levels 3-5 by Ethnicity
* Data from the Office of Assessment and Data Analysis
Property of Miami-Dade County Public Schools. Rev. 02/06/2006
School Improvement Zone
Percent Reduction in the
Number of Students Scoring
at Level 1, Grades 3-5 by Ethnicity
50
41
48
32
3637
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Black Hispanic White
2004 2005
43
40
25
34
30
22
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Black Hispanic White
2004 2005
Reading Mathematics
* Data from the Office of Assessment and Data Analysis
Property of Miami-Dade County Public Schools. Rev. 02/06/2006
Property of Miami-Dade County Public Schools. Rev. 02/06/2006
A DASHBOARD
FOR M-DCPS
• Purpose and Intended Uses
• Cultural Requirements
• Aligned to Function Scorecards
• Post-Unitary Commitment integrated across
District Dashboards and Key Performance
Indicators (KPIs)
• Progress Monitoring
• Evaluating Results – Cross-Functional Teams
Property of Miami-Dade County Public Schools. Rev. 02/06/2006
Property of Miami-Dade County Public Schools. Rev. 02/06/2006
Property of Miami-Dade County Public Schools. Rev. 02/06/2006
PERFORMANCE
SCORECARDS
Different cards for different types of schools:
• Elementary
• Middle
• Senior High
• K-8 Centers
• Alternative Schools
• Adult Centers
• ESE Centers
Property of Miami-Dade County Public Schools. Rev. 02/06/2006
CONTENT
OF SCORECARDS
• District Strategic Plan/Goals & Objectives
• Student Performance/Achievement Gap
• Student Progression Trends
• Student Health, Safety, and Attendance
• Human Resources (OPIS)
• Parent/Stakeholder Engagement
• Business Operations
Property of Miami-Dade County Public Schools. Rev. 02/06/2006
TWO-STEP
CLUSTER ANALYSIS
An exploratory tool designed to reveal natural
groupings (or clusters)
within a data set that would
otherwise not be apparent
Property of Miami-Dade County Public Schools. Rev. 02/06/2006
VARIABLES USED
• Ethnic Composition
• Membership
• Free/Reduced Lunch
• Mobility Rate
• LEP Participation
• Reading/Math Performance (% 3 +)
Property of Miami-Dade County Public Schools. Rev. 02/06/2006
Property of Miami-Dade County Public Schools. Rev. 02/06/2006
Property of Miami-Dade County Public Schools. Rev. 02/06/2006
Property of Miami-Dade County Public Schools. Rev. 02/06/2006
Property of Miami-Dade County Public Schools. Rev. 02/06/2006
Property of Miami-Dade County Public Schools. Rev. 02/06/2006
PRINCIPLES FOR
TARGET SETTING
• Improvement over prior year’s actual and trend data
• “Stretch” to achieve strategic objectives
• Ask, “How much improvement is needed to achieve
the organization’s plan?”
• If no data are available, targets should be based on
expert judgment about broader strategic objectives
• “Benchmarking” – internal and external
• School’s cohort information
• Delta T
Property of Miami-Dade County Public Schools. Rev. 02/06/2006
CLUSTER
MEAN GAINS
READING
CLUSTER 1 = 3.3
CLUSTER 2 = 4.6
CLUSTER 3 = 5.1
MATHEMATICS
CLUSTER 1 = 3.6
CLUSTER 2 = 5.4
CLUSTER 3 = 5.3
Property of Miami-Dade County Public Schools. Rev. 02/06/2006
SCORECARD
TARGET GUIDELINES
School Grades
Cluster 1 (+ 7 points)
Cluster 2 (+ 14 points)
Cluster 3 (+ 14 points)
Reading and Math Performance
Cluster 1 (+ 3 points)
Cluster 2 (+ 4 points)
Cluster 3 (+ 5 points)
Property of Miami-Dade County Public Schools. Rev. 02/06/2006
Critical Cross-Functional Processes
Improving
Student
Achievement
Human
Resources
Accountability &
Systemwide
Performance
School
Operations
Curriculum and
Instruction/School
Improvement Zone
Strategic
Planning
Professional
Development
Cross-
Functional
Processes
Business
Operations
Property of Miami-Dade County Public Schools. Rev. 02/06/2006
M-DCPS IS ON THE MOVE!
Property of Miami-Dade County Public Schools. Rev. 02/06/2006
Dr. Kriner Cash, Chief
Accountability and Systemwide Performance
Miami-Dade County Public Schools
1450 N.E. 2nd Avenue, Suite 802
Miami, Florida 33132
Phone: (305) 995-3066
Fax: (305) 995-7592
KCash@dadeschools.net
Mr. Carlos A. Viera, Executive Director
Office of Performance Improvement
1500 Biscayne Boulevard, Suite 225
Miami, Florida 33132
Phone: (305) 995-7597
Fax: (305) 995-4189
CViera@dadeschools.net

Contenu connexe

En vedette

En vedette (7)

LABORATORIO3
LABORATORIO3LABORATORIO3
LABORATORIO3
 
New Frontiers FY14-15
New Frontiers FY14-15New Frontiers FY14-15
New Frontiers FY14-15
 
my A story - student life
my A story - student lifemy A story - student life
my A story - student life
 
Google drive
Google driveGoogle drive
Google drive
 
Símbolos patrios del perú
Símbolos patrios del perúSímbolos patrios del perú
Símbolos patrios del perú
 
Red social
Red socialRed social
Red social
 
Fiscal Impact Analysis: New Methods, New Data and Best Practices
Fiscal Impact Analysis: New Methods, New Data and Best PracticesFiscal Impact Analysis: New Methods, New Data and Best Practices
Fiscal Impact Analysis: New Methods, New Data and Best Practices
 

Similaire à Meeting the Challenges of Equity ASCD March 2006

Road map for_education_results(ccer)_may
Road map for_education_results(ccer)_mayRoad map for_education_results(ccer)_may
Road map for_education_results(ccer)_maysremala
 
Road map for_education_results(ccer)_april
Road map for_education_results(ccer)_aprilRoad map for_education_results(ccer)_april
Road map for_education_results(ccer)_aprilsremala
 
Pla Methdology 3 19 2010
Pla Methdology 3 19 2010Pla Methdology 3 19 2010
Pla Methdology 3 19 2010WSU Cougars
 
10 20-2014 tamsa-overview
10 20-2014 tamsa-overview10 20-2014 tamsa-overview
10 20-2014 tamsa-overviewTAMSA
 
2 22-2015 tamsa-overview
2 22-2015 tamsa-overview2 22-2015 tamsa-overview
2 22-2015 tamsa-overviewTAMSA
 
MCS prepares to set new path toward better learning, better stewardship
MCS prepares to set new path toward better learning, better stewardshipMCS prepares to set new path toward better learning, better stewardship
MCS prepares to set new path toward better learning, better stewardshipPatricia Gibson
 
Rps Harvard Presentation 12.2.10
Rps   Harvard Presentation 12.2.10Rps   Harvard Presentation 12.2.10
Rps Harvard Presentation 12.2.10kimbridges
 
Jared Polis Foundation Education Report Fall 2002
Jared Polis Foundation Education Report Fall 2002Jared Polis Foundation Education Report Fall 2002
Jared Polis Foundation Education Report Fall 2002Lisa Finkelstein
 
Road Map For Ed Results
Road Map For  Ed ResultsRoad Map For  Ed Results
Road Map For Ed Resultssremala
 
2 19-2015 tamsa-overview web-1
2 19-2015 tamsa-overview web-12 19-2015 tamsa-overview web-1
2 19-2015 tamsa-overview web-1TAMSA
 
2 22-2015 tamsa-overview web
2 22-2015 tamsa-overview web2 22-2015 tamsa-overview web
2 22-2015 tamsa-overview webTAMSA
 
Ozark School District Market Plan
Ozark School District Market PlanOzark School District Market Plan
Ozark School District Market PlanDella Stewart
 
Kansas Board of Regents_Foresight2020_2015 Progress Report
Kansas Board of Regents_Foresight2020_2015 Progress ReportKansas Board of Regents_Foresight2020_2015 Progress Report
Kansas Board of Regents_Foresight2020_2015 Progress ReportBreeze Richardson
 
Sept. Presentation Changes
Sept. Presentation ChangesSept. Presentation Changes
Sept. Presentation ChangesIke Haynes
 
The Difference You Make: Using Data to Highlight Equity for All
The Difference You Make: Using Data to Highlight Equity for AllThe Difference You Make: Using Data to Highlight Equity for All
The Difference You Make: Using Data to Highlight Equity for Allappliedsurveyresearch
 
AState-Credo-Presentation
AState-Credo-PresentationAState-Credo-Presentation
AState-Credo-PresentationIan Singer
 

Similaire à Meeting the Challenges of Equity ASCD March 2006 (20)

Road map for_education_results(ccer)_may
Road map for_education_results(ccer)_mayRoad map for_education_results(ccer)_may
Road map for_education_results(ccer)_may
 
Road map for_education_results(ccer)_april
Road map for_education_results(ccer)_aprilRoad map for_education_results(ccer)_april
Road map for_education_results(ccer)_april
 
Pla Methdology 3 19 2010
Pla Methdology 3 19 2010Pla Methdology 3 19 2010
Pla Methdology 3 19 2010
 
10 20-2014 tamsa-overview
10 20-2014 tamsa-overview10 20-2014 tamsa-overview
10 20-2014 tamsa-overview
 
TAMSA Slideshow
TAMSA SlideshowTAMSA Slideshow
TAMSA Slideshow
 
2 22-2015 tamsa-overview
2 22-2015 tamsa-overview2 22-2015 tamsa-overview
2 22-2015 tamsa-overview
 
8 21-2014+tamsa-overview
8 21-2014+tamsa-overview8 21-2014+tamsa-overview
8 21-2014+tamsa-overview
 
MCS prepares to set new path toward better learning, better stewardship
MCS prepares to set new path toward better learning, better stewardshipMCS prepares to set new path toward better learning, better stewardship
MCS prepares to set new path toward better learning, better stewardship
 
10 20-2014 tamsa-overview
10 20-2014 tamsa-overview10 20-2014 tamsa-overview
10 20-2014 tamsa-overview
 
Rps Harvard Presentation 12.2.10
Rps   Harvard Presentation 12.2.10Rps   Harvard Presentation 12.2.10
Rps Harvard Presentation 12.2.10
 
Jared Polis Foundation Education Report Fall 2002
Jared Polis Foundation Education Report Fall 2002Jared Polis Foundation Education Report Fall 2002
Jared Polis Foundation Education Report Fall 2002
 
Road Map For Ed Results
Road Map For  Ed ResultsRoad Map For  Ed Results
Road Map For Ed Results
 
2 19-2015 tamsa-overview web-1
2 19-2015 tamsa-overview web-12 19-2015 tamsa-overview web-1
2 19-2015 tamsa-overview web-1
 
2 22-2015 tamsa-overview web
2 22-2015 tamsa-overview web2 22-2015 tamsa-overview web
2 22-2015 tamsa-overview web
 
Ozark School District Market Plan
Ozark School District Market PlanOzark School District Market Plan
Ozark School District Market Plan
 
Kansas Board of Regents_Foresight2020_2015 Progress Report
Kansas Board of Regents_Foresight2020_2015 Progress ReportKansas Board of Regents_Foresight2020_2015 Progress Report
Kansas Board of Regents_Foresight2020_2015 Progress Report
 
CEO Update (July 11, 2014)
CEO Update (July 11, 2014)CEO Update (July 11, 2014)
CEO Update (July 11, 2014)
 
Sept. Presentation Changes
Sept. Presentation ChangesSept. Presentation Changes
Sept. Presentation Changes
 
The Difference You Make: Using Data to Highlight Equity for All
The Difference You Make: Using Data to Highlight Equity for AllThe Difference You Make: Using Data to Highlight Equity for All
The Difference You Make: Using Data to Highlight Equity for All
 
AState-Credo-Presentation
AState-Credo-PresentationAState-Credo-Presentation
AState-Credo-Presentation
 

Plus de Carlos A. Viera, PhD, SPHR

Plus de Carlos A. Viera, PhD, SPHR (10)

Strategic Planning, Implementation, Monitoring, and Reporting
Strategic Planning, Implementation, Monitoring, and Reporting Strategic Planning, Implementation, Monitoring, and Reporting
Strategic Planning, Implementation, Monitoring, and Reporting
 
D-3135 Strategic Planning 2015-2020 v7
D-3135 Strategic Planning 2015-2020 v7D-3135 Strategic Planning 2015-2020 v7
D-3135 Strategic Planning 2015-2020 v7
 
PIJournal_Published_10.1002-pfi.21533
PIJournal_Published_10.1002-pfi.21533PIJournal_Published_10.1002-pfi.21533
PIJournal_Published_10.1002-pfi.21533
 
Developing Enhanced Leadership for Data-Driven Schools (Fina
Developing Enhanced Leadership for Data-Driven Schools (FinaDeveloping Enhanced Leadership for Data-Driven Schools (Fina
Developing Enhanced Leadership for Data-Driven Schools (Fina
 
Miami Local; Action Committee
Miami Local; Action CommitteeMiami Local; Action Committee
Miami Local; Action Committee
 
C. Viera Letter (June 2014)_L.Lecht
C. Viera Letter (June 2014)_L.LechtC. Viera Letter (June 2014)_L.Lecht
C. Viera Letter (June 2014)_L.Lecht
 
baldcover
baldcoverbaldcover
baldcover
 
baldridge Carlos's article
baldridge Carlos's articlebaldridge Carlos's article
baldridge Carlos's article
 
StudentSerfvices Advisory Council _January 14, 2014
StudentSerfvices Advisory Council _January 14, 2014StudentSerfvices Advisory Council _January 14, 2014
StudentSerfvices Advisory Council _January 14, 2014
 
performancexpress.org-2015 Distinguished Dissertation Awards
performancexpress.org-2015 Distinguished Dissertation Awardsperformancexpress.org-2015 Distinguished Dissertation Awards
performancexpress.org-2015 Distinguished Dissertation Awards
 

Meeting the Challenges of Equity ASCD March 2006

  • 1. Property of Miami-Dade County Public Schools. Rev. 02/06/2006 Dr. Kriner Cash, Chief Accountability and Systemwide Performance and Mr. Carlos A. Viera, Executive Director Office of Performance Improvement Miami-Dade County Public Schools
  • 2. Property of Miami-Dade County Public Schools. Rev. 02/06/2006  Session Objectives  On Philosophy, Vision and Culture  Key Concepts  M-DCPS’ Top Accomplishments of 2004-2005  M-DCPS’ Top Priorities for 2005-2006  School Improvement Zone (SIZ) Outcome Data 2004-2005  District Dashboard  Performance Scorecards PRESENTATION OVERVIEW
  • 3. Property of Miami-Dade County Public Schools. Rev. 02/06/2006 Session Objectives • Reinforce critical knowledge and understanding about the kind of leadership, resources, and systems thinking required to turn around performance in underperforming schools. • Describe core processes and tools that must be sharpened and/or re-designed in order for organizational results to improve from good to better to best. • Provide key strategies for increasing graduation rates and decreasing retention among the District’s minority groups. • Highlight processes for increasing the percentages of underrepresented minorities in advanced academic coursework.  
  • 4. Property of Miami-Dade County Public Schools. Rev. 02/06/2006 Key Concepts • Knowledge Management • Value Triangle • Cascading Accountability • Sustainability • Market Branding • Post-Unitary Commitments
  • 5. Property of Miami-Dade County Public Schools. Rev. 02/06/2006 Systems Thinking Breakthrough 2010 and Beyond 2004 Efficiency & Sustainability Equity Quality Stability Repair & Upgrade
  • 6. Property of Miami-Dade County Public Schools. Rev. 02/06/2006
  • 7. Property of Miami-Dade County Public Schools. Rev. 02/06/2006 Organizational Alignment
  • 8. Property of Miami-Dade County Public Schools. Rev. 02/06/2006 Top Accomplishments of 2004-2005 1. Schools receiving an “A” from the state grew to 138 (41% of 334 schools) from 103 (31%) – the highest number ever – despite tougher state standards, and schools receiving a repeat “F” were reduced to 3 from 9 – a 66% reduction. 2. Third graders considered proficient readers rose to 61% from 57% - the highest ever, and 1,814 fewer 3rd graders are at risk of being held back because of reading scores. 3. Chronically low-performing schools (39) were placed in a “School Improvement Zone” with an extended school day and year, a common reading program, and mandatory teacher training; 80% of these schools registered performance gains in the state accountability system – with 40% improving enough to raise their state grade. 4. All employees received an average 3% raise using a $44 million negotiating reserve carved from the existing budget. 5. Designed a structure for an integrated approach to addressing our “Post-Unitary Commitment to Equity and Diversity.”
  • 9. Property of Miami-Dade County Public Schools. Rev. 02/06/2006 Top Accomplishments of 2004-2005 6. Reorganization of central office eliminated more than 500 positions, freeing up $38 million for other educational needs. 7. Constructed 18,000 new student seats to address overcrowding – more than three times the number planned by the prior administration. 8. First comprehensive five-year capital plan was developed, identifying $3.3 billion in needs. 9. First comprehensive five-year Information Technology Blueprint was commissioned by the School Board at a cost of $90 million, identifying and aligning priority system processes. 10. Bond rating firms improved their official outlook for M- DCPS based on the administration’s management of the District’s finances, including a 50% increase in the “rainy day” fund.
  • 10. Property of Miami-Dade County Public Schools. Rev. 02/06/2006 M-DCPS’ Top Priorities for 2005-2006 • Launch Secondary School Reform • Continue strong literacy emphasis • Build 20,000 new student seats • Pilot incentive pay performance plan for administrators • Launch Parent Academy • Improve customer service and satisfaction
  • 11. Property of Miami-Dade County Public Schools. Rev. 02/06/2006 EQUTY & D V E R S I T YI A d v a n c e d , H o n o rs, A d v a n c e d P la c e m e n t C o u rs e s, a n d G ift e d E d u c a tio n 2 0 0 2 - 2 0 0 3 A c a d e m ic Ye a r R e t e n tio n a n d G ra d u a tio n 2 0 0 1 - 2 0 0 2 a n d 2 0 0 2 - 2 0 0 3 R e v is e d 9 / 2 0 0 5 M i a m i - D a d e C o u n t y P u b l i c S c h o o l s P o s t - U n i t a r y C o m m i t m e n t s t o E q u i t y a n d D i v e r s i t y Integrated Approach to Achieving Our……
  • 12. Property of Miami-Dade County Public Schools. Rev. 02/06/2006
  • 13. Property of Miami-Dade County Public Schools. Rev. 02/06/2006 School Improvement Zone 2004-2005 Academic Achievement Outcomes READING Percent of schools decreasing their number of students in Level 1 Percent of schools increasing their number of students in Levels 3-5 Zone Schools 76 84 District 84 82 MATHEMATICS Percent of schools decreasing their number of students in Level 1 Percent of schools increasing their number of students in Levels 3-5 Zone Schools 95 95 District 90 88 * Data from the Office of Assessment and Data Analysis
  • 14. Property of Miami-Dade County Public Schools. Rev. 02/06/2006 W h ite H isp a n ic B la ck W h ite H isp a n ic B la ck W h ite H isp a n ic B la ck 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2004 2005 Grades 3-5 Grades 6-8 Grades 9-10Grades 3-5 Grades 6-8 Grades 9-10 School Improvement Zone Percent of Students Scoring Levels 3-5 by Ethnicity Reading * Data from the Office of Assessment and Data Analysis
  • 15. Property of Miami-Dade County Public Schools. Rev. 02/06/2006 W h ite H isp a n ic B la ck W h ite H isp a n ic B la ck W h ite H isp a n ic B la ck 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2004 2005 Grades 3-5 Grades 6-8 Grades 9-10Grades 3-5 Grades 6-8 Grades 9-10 Mathematics School Improvement Zone Percent of Students Scoring Levels 3-5 by Ethnicity * Data from the Office of Assessment and Data Analysis
  • 16. Property of Miami-Dade County Public Schools. Rev. 02/06/2006 School Improvement Zone Percent Reduction in the Number of Students Scoring at Level 1, Grades 3-5 by Ethnicity 50 41 48 32 3637 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Black Hispanic White 2004 2005 43 40 25 34 30 22 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Black Hispanic White 2004 2005 Reading Mathematics * Data from the Office of Assessment and Data Analysis
  • 17. Property of Miami-Dade County Public Schools. Rev. 02/06/2006
  • 18. Property of Miami-Dade County Public Schools. Rev. 02/06/2006 A DASHBOARD FOR M-DCPS • Purpose and Intended Uses • Cultural Requirements • Aligned to Function Scorecards • Post-Unitary Commitment integrated across District Dashboards and Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) • Progress Monitoring • Evaluating Results – Cross-Functional Teams
  • 19. Property of Miami-Dade County Public Schools. Rev. 02/06/2006
  • 20. Property of Miami-Dade County Public Schools. Rev. 02/06/2006
  • 21. Property of Miami-Dade County Public Schools. Rev. 02/06/2006 PERFORMANCE SCORECARDS Different cards for different types of schools: • Elementary • Middle • Senior High • K-8 Centers • Alternative Schools • Adult Centers • ESE Centers
  • 22. Property of Miami-Dade County Public Schools. Rev. 02/06/2006 CONTENT OF SCORECARDS • District Strategic Plan/Goals & Objectives • Student Performance/Achievement Gap • Student Progression Trends • Student Health, Safety, and Attendance • Human Resources (OPIS) • Parent/Stakeholder Engagement • Business Operations
  • 23. Property of Miami-Dade County Public Schools. Rev. 02/06/2006 TWO-STEP CLUSTER ANALYSIS An exploratory tool designed to reveal natural groupings (or clusters) within a data set that would otherwise not be apparent
  • 24. Property of Miami-Dade County Public Schools. Rev. 02/06/2006 VARIABLES USED • Ethnic Composition • Membership • Free/Reduced Lunch • Mobility Rate • LEP Participation • Reading/Math Performance (% 3 +)
  • 25. Property of Miami-Dade County Public Schools. Rev. 02/06/2006
  • 26. Property of Miami-Dade County Public Schools. Rev. 02/06/2006
  • 27. Property of Miami-Dade County Public Schools. Rev. 02/06/2006
  • 28. Property of Miami-Dade County Public Schools. Rev. 02/06/2006
  • 29. Property of Miami-Dade County Public Schools. Rev. 02/06/2006
  • 30. Property of Miami-Dade County Public Schools. Rev. 02/06/2006 PRINCIPLES FOR TARGET SETTING • Improvement over prior year’s actual and trend data • “Stretch” to achieve strategic objectives • Ask, “How much improvement is needed to achieve the organization’s plan?” • If no data are available, targets should be based on expert judgment about broader strategic objectives • “Benchmarking” – internal and external • School’s cohort information • Delta T
  • 31. Property of Miami-Dade County Public Schools. Rev. 02/06/2006 CLUSTER MEAN GAINS READING CLUSTER 1 = 3.3 CLUSTER 2 = 4.6 CLUSTER 3 = 5.1 MATHEMATICS CLUSTER 1 = 3.6 CLUSTER 2 = 5.4 CLUSTER 3 = 5.3
  • 32. Property of Miami-Dade County Public Schools. Rev. 02/06/2006 SCORECARD TARGET GUIDELINES School Grades Cluster 1 (+ 7 points) Cluster 2 (+ 14 points) Cluster 3 (+ 14 points) Reading and Math Performance Cluster 1 (+ 3 points) Cluster 2 (+ 4 points) Cluster 3 (+ 5 points)
  • 33. Property of Miami-Dade County Public Schools. Rev. 02/06/2006 Critical Cross-Functional Processes Improving Student Achievement Human Resources Accountability & Systemwide Performance School Operations Curriculum and Instruction/School Improvement Zone Strategic Planning Professional Development Cross- Functional Processes Business Operations
  • 34. Property of Miami-Dade County Public Schools. Rev. 02/06/2006 M-DCPS IS ON THE MOVE!
  • 35. Property of Miami-Dade County Public Schools. Rev. 02/06/2006 Dr. Kriner Cash, Chief Accountability and Systemwide Performance Miami-Dade County Public Schools 1450 N.E. 2nd Avenue, Suite 802 Miami, Florida 33132 Phone: (305) 995-3066 Fax: (305) 995-7592 KCash@dadeschools.net Mr. Carlos A. Viera, Executive Director Office of Performance Improvement 1500 Biscayne Boulevard, Suite 225 Miami, Florida 33132 Phone: (305) 995-7597 Fax: (305) 995-4189 CViera@dadeschools.net

Notes de l'éditeur

  1. Efficient processes & adequate resources to keep it going Equal access to programs Ensure high quality standards across schools and programs despite diverse differences Ratchet up and hold Identify clear needs and priorities for improvement