1. Property of Miami-Dade County Public Schools. Rev. 02/06/2006
Dr. Kriner Cash, Chief
Accountability and Systemwide Performance
and
Mr. Carlos A. Viera, Executive Director
Office of Performance Improvement
Miami-Dade County Public Schools
2. Property of Miami-Dade County Public Schools. Rev. 02/06/2006
Session Objectives
On Philosophy, Vision and Culture
Key Concepts
M-DCPS’ Top Accomplishments of 2004-2005
M-DCPS’ Top Priorities for 2005-2006
School Improvement Zone (SIZ)
Outcome Data 2004-2005
District Dashboard
Performance Scorecards
PRESENTATION OVERVIEW
3. Property of Miami-Dade County Public Schools. Rev. 02/06/2006
Session Objectives
• Reinforce critical knowledge and understanding about
the kind of leadership, resources, and systems thinking
required to turn around performance in underperforming
schools.
• Describe core processes and tools that must be
sharpened and/or re-designed in order for organizational
results to improve from good to better to best.
• Provide key strategies for increasing graduation rates
and decreasing retention among the District’s minority
groups.
• Highlight processes for increasing the percentages of
underrepresented minorities in advanced academic
coursework.
4. Property of Miami-Dade County Public Schools. Rev. 02/06/2006
Key Concepts
• Knowledge Management
• Value Triangle
• Cascading Accountability
• Sustainability
• Market Branding
• Post-Unitary Commitments
5. Property of Miami-Dade County Public Schools. Rev. 02/06/2006
Systems Thinking
Breakthrough
2010
and
Beyond
2004
Efficiency
&
Sustainability
Equity
Quality
Stability
Repair & Upgrade
8. Property of Miami-Dade County Public Schools. Rev. 02/06/2006
Top Accomplishments
of 2004-2005
1. Schools receiving an “A” from the state grew to 138 (41%
of 334 schools) from 103 (31%) – the highest number ever
– despite tougher state standards, and schools receiving a
repeat “F” were reduced to 3 from 9 – a 66% reduction.
2. Third graders considered proficient readers rose to 61%
from 57% - the highest ever, and 1,814 fewer 3rd graders
are at risk of being held back because of reading scores.
3. Chronically low-performing schools (39) were placed in a
“School Improvement Zone” with an extended school day
and year, a common reading program, and mandatory
teacher training; 80% of these schools registered
performance gains in the state accountability system – with
40% improving enough to raise their state grade.
4. All employees received an average 3% raise using a $44
million negotiating reserve carved from the existing budget.
5. Designed a structure for an integrated approach to
addressing our “Post-Unitary Commitment to Equity and
Diversity.”
9. Property of Miami-Dade County Public Schools. Rev. 02/06/2006
Top Accomplishments
of 2004-2005
6. Reorganization of central office eliminated more than
500 positions, freeing up $38 million for other
educational needs.
7. Constructed 18,000 new student seats to address
overcrowding – more than three times the number
planned by the prior administration.
8. First comprehensive five-year capital plan was
developed, identifying $3.3 billion in needs.
9. First comprehensive five-year Information Technology
Blueprint was commissioned by the School Board at a
cost of $90 million, identifying and aligning priority
system processes.
10. Bond rating firms improved their official outlook for M-
DCPS based on the administration’s management of
the District’s finances, including a 50% increase in the
“rainy day” fund.
10. Property of Miami-Dade County Public Schools. Rev. 02/06/2006
M-DCPS’ Top Priorities
for 2005-2006
• Launch Secondary School Reform
• Continue strong literacy emphasis
• Build 20,000 new student seats
• Pilot incentive pay performance plan
for administrators
• Launch Parent Academy
• Improve customer service and
satisfaction
11. Property of Miami-Dade County Public Schools. Rev. 02/06/2006
EQUTY
&
D V E R S I T YI
A d v a n c e d , H o n o rs, A d v a n c e d
P la c e m e n t C o u rs e s, a n d G ift e d E d u c a tio n
2 0 0 2 - 2 0 0 3 A c a d e m ic Ye a r
R e t e n tio n a n d G ra d u a tio n
2 0 0 1 - 2 0 0 2 a n d 2 0 0 2 - 2 0 0 3
R e v is e d 9 / 2 0 0 5
M i a m i - D a d e C o u n t y P u b l i c S c h o o l s
P o s t - U n i t a r y C o m m i t m e n t s t o
E q u i t y a n d D i v e r s i t y
Integrated Approach to
Achieving Our……
13. Property of Miami-Dade County Public Schools. Rev. 02/06/2006
School Improvement Zone
2004-2005
Academic Achievement Outcomes
READING
Percent of schools decreasing
their number of students in
Level 1
Percent of schools increasing
their number of students in
Levels 3-5
Zone Schools 76 84
District 84 82
MATHEMATICS
Percent of schools decreasing
their number of students in
Level 1
Percent of schools increasing
their number of students in
Levels 3-5
Zone Schools 95 95
District 90 88
* Data from the Office of Assessment and Data Analysis
14. Property of Miami-Dade County Public Schools. Rev. 02/06/2006
W
h
ite
H
isp
a
n
ic
B
la
ck
W
h
ite
H
isp
a
n
ic
B
la
ck
W
h
ite
H
isp
a
n
ic
B
la
ck
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
2004 2005
Grades 3-5 Grades 6-8 Grades 9-10Grades 3-5 Grades 6-8 Grades 9-10
School Improvement Zone
Percent of Students
Scoring Levels 3-5 by Ethnicity
Reading
* Data from the Office of Assessment and Data Analysis
15. Property of Miami-Dade County Public Schools. Rev. 02/06/2006
W
h
ite
H
isp
a
n
ic
B
la
ck
W
h
ite
H
isp
a
n
ic
B
la
ck
W
h
ite
H
isp
a
n
ic
B
la
ck
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
2004 2005
Grades 3-5 Grades 6-8 Grades 9-10Grades 3-5 Grades 6-8 Grades 9-10
Mathematics
School Improvement Zone
Percent of Students
Scoring Levels 3-5 by Ethnicity
* Data from the Office of Assessment and Data Analysis
16. Property of Miami-Dade County Public Schools. Rev. 02/06/2006
School Improvement Zone
Percent Reduction in the
Number of Students Scoring
at Level 1, Grades 3-5 by Ethnicity
50
41
48
32
3637
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Black Hispanic White
2004 2005
43
40
25
34
30
22
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Black Hispanic White
2004 2005
Reading Mathematics
* Data from the Office of Assessment and Data Analysis
18. Property of Miami-Dade County Public Schools. Rev. 02/06/2006
A DASHBOARD
FOR M-DCPS
• Purpose and Intended Uses
• Cultural Requirements
• Aligned to Function Scorecards
• Post-Unitary Commitment integrated across
District Dashboards and Key Performance
Indicators (KPIs)
• Progress Monitoring
• Evaluating Results – Cross-Functional Teams
21. Property of Miami-Dade County Public Schools. Rev. 02/06/2006
PERFORMANCE
SCORECARDS
Different cards for different types of schools:
• Elementary
• Middle
• Senior High
• K-8 Centers
• Alternative Schools
• Adult Centers
• ESE Centers
22. Property of Miami-Dade County Public Schools. Rev. 02/06/2006
CONTENT
OF SCORECARDS
• District Strategic Plan/Goals & Objectives
• Student Performance/Achievement Gap
• Student Progression Trends
• Student Health, Safety, and Attendance
• Human Resources (OPIS)
• Parent/Stakeholder Engagement
• Business Operations
23. Property of Miami-Dade County Public Schools. Rev. 02/06/2006
TWO-STEP
CLUSTER ANALYSIS
An exploratory tool designed to reveal natural
groupings (or clusters)
within a data set that would
otherwise not be apparent
24. Property of Miami-Dade County Public Schools. Rev. 02/06/2006
VARIABLES USED
• Ethnic Composition
• Membership
• Free/Reduced Lunch
• Mobility Rate
• LEP Participation
• Reading/Math Performance (% 3 +)
30. Property of Miami-Dade County Public Schools. Rev. 02/06/2006
PRINCIPLES FOR
TARGET SETTING
• Improvement over prior year’s actual and trend data
• “Stretch” to achieve strategic objectives
• Ask, “How much improvement is needed to achieve
the organization’s plan?”
• If no data are available, targets should be based on
expert judgment about broader strategic objectives
• “Benchmarking” – internal and external
• School’s cohort information
• Delta T
31. Property of Miami-Dade County Public Schools. Rev. 02/06/2006
CLUSTER
MEAN GAINS
READING
CLUSTER 1 = 3.3
CLUSTER 2 = 4.6
CLUSTER 3 = 5.1
MATHEMATICS
CLUSTER 1 = 3.6
CLUSTER 2 = 5.4
CLUSTER 3 = 5.3
32. Property of Miami-Dade County Public Schools. Rev. 02/06/2006
SCORECARD
TARGET GUIDELINES
School Grades
Cluster 1 (+ 7 points)
Cluster 2 (+ 14 points)
Cluster 3 (+ 14 points)
Reading and Math Performance
Cluster 1 (+ 3 points)
Cluster 2 (+ 4 points)
Cluster 3 (+ 5 points)
33. Property of Miami-Dade County Public Schools. Rev. 02/06/2006
Critical Cross-Functional Processes
Improving
Student
Achievement
Human
Resources
Accountability &
Systemwide
Performance
School
Operations
Curriculum and
Instruction/School
Improvement Zone
Strategic
Planning
Professional
Development
Cross-
Functional
Processes
Business
Operations
35. Property of Miami-Dade County Public Schools. Rev. 02/06/2006
Dr. Kriner Cash, Chief
Accountability and Systemwide Performance
Miami-Dade County Public Schools
1450 N.E. 2nd Avenue, Suite 802
Miami, Florida 33132
Phone: (305) 995-3066
Fax: (305) 995-7592
KCash@dadeschools.net
Mr. Carlos A. Viera, Executive Director
Office of Performance Improvement
1500 Biscayne Boulevard, Suite 225
Miami, Florida 33132
Phone: (305) 995-7597
Fax: (305) 995-4189
CViera@dadeschools.net
Notes de l'éditeur
Efficient processes & adequate resources to keep it going
Equal access to programs
Ensure high quality standards across schools and programs despite diverse differences
Ratchet up and hold
Identify clear needs and priorities for improvement