SlideShare une entreprise Scribd logo
1  sur  16
DOT BRAND –  NEW GTLDS Application Concept of Use Operations March 2011
Dot Brand Overall Issues to Address... 1    2    3 .Brand Apply? How to use it? Is it worth the money? Are we in danger of others applying for a TLD that will block for us? Will a .brand TLD be the norm? Will consumers  expect a .brand ? Application Operations Concept of Use What is the procedure? What is the timeline? What are the external costs? What is history and current status? How to run dot Brand? What are the requirements?How to Roll Out? What to outsource? What are the costs? What is the Mission? How are we going to use and promote dot Brand? What are benefits and risks? Choice of providersWho will be able to deliver best product for us?  Back-end:
New gTLDs What is this all about? 1    2    3 ICANN: ”In a world with over 1.6 billion internet users - and growing - diversity, choice and competition are key to the continued success and reach of the global network.” Kurt Pritz, Senior Vice President of Services at ICANN: “…perhaps 5,000 new gTLDs could be added by 2015…”
New gTLDs .brand. city .region .businessarea and IDN (non Latin Script) 1    2    3
New gTLDs Today and Future – maybe 500 new gTLDs 1    2    3 Today: www.nikeshoes.com Future: shoes.nike or football.nike Today: Domain name registration with domain name registrar Future: Brands control OWN top level domain. Example: ”.Nike” – NIKE controls the policy and rules. I.e. Only NIKE company and agents can register a .Nike domain name. Maybe: shoes.nike, city.nike, woman.nike, kids.nike....
DOT BRAND TLD Time Line  - Application Q3, 2011 Launch in 2012 1    2    3 Timeline Final Applicant Guidebook published May 30 Board Approval of new gTLD Program June 20 Application period (3 months) is expected to start  October/Nov Evaluation (5 months minimum) Registry Agreement and Test (2-3 months) Launch 8-19 Months after application Launch Q4 2012- Q3 2013 Uncertainties: How will GAC react on Board Feed back? How will ICANN Board react on public comments and  various stakeholder comments/positions? Will the Program be postponed once more? IF APPROVED:  Number of applications (criteria for batches of 500 ??) Number of contention sets Objections Extended Review Testing
Application Application and Evaluation Processes are somewhat complex 1    2    3 Application: Evaluation is a complicated process.  Path for community based application differs from path of standard application. Second evaluation if public objection. Ultimately an auction might be decisive.
Application Application and Evaluation Processes are somewhat complex 1    2    3 Evaluation String Reviews String similarity Reserved names DNS stability 	Geographic names Applicant Reviews 	Demonstration of technical and operational capability 	Demonstration of financial capability 	Registry services reviews for DNS stability issues  Public objection criteria - which cause second evaluation: Existing legal rights, string confusion, morality or violation of a community Similarity amongst applications (Contention Sets) 	Identical and visually similar strings 	If at least two of the applications are community based a comparative evaluation might 	be decisive  	If no clear winner is found an auction will be decisive 	Auction if both applications are “standard” applications
Concept of Use Why and who? 1    2    3 Mission? There are many reasons for applying – depending on who you are and what you want to achieve. Who? Brand owners who want to promote brands Brand owners for defensive reasons Brand owners wanting to dominate a generic term – i.e. ”.beer”, ”.insurance”, ”.pharma” Brand owners who want to tie customers closer to their company – ISPs offering free domains incl emails under own TLD. Brand owners who want to track product – i.e. ”serialnumber.brand” Entrepreneurs who want to compete with known TLDs - .sport, .hotel etc. Cities and governments - .berlin, .bayern, .africa Communities who want to create an environment for their (minority) community - .surf, .gay, .cym etc. Type of application – standard or community - will be based/assessed upon the applicant’s written concept of use and the eventual definition of the ”community.”
Concept of use Restricted? Partly Restricted? Open?  1    2    3 Identify Purpose ,[object Object]
 Promote Brand?
 Added Value Services (product.brand, branch.brand, service.brand consumer.brand)
 Emails?
 Communities for consumers and fans?
 Secure space for consumers?
 No fraud

Contenu connexe

Similaire à Tt dot brand march 2011

Saleswax - -public
Saleswax - -publicSaleswax - -public
Saleswax - -public
Saleswax
 
Melbourne IT - iStrategy Atlanta
Melbourne IT - iStrategy AtlantaMelbourne IT - iStrategy Atlanta
Melbourne IT - iStrategy Atlanta
iStrategy
 
Melbourneit Brandowners
Melbourneit BrandownersMelbourneit Brandowners
Melbourneit Brandowners
claytonnarcis
 

Similaire à Tt dot brand march 2011 (20)

Saleswax - -public
Saleswax - -publicSaleswax - -public
Saleswax - -public
 
Narrative Mind Week 8 H4D Stanford 2016
Narrative Mind Week 8 H4D Stanford 2016Narrative Mind Week 8 H4D Stanford 2016
Narrative Mind Week 8 H4D Stanford 2016
 
Reqs analysis
Reqs analysisReqs analysis
Reqs analysis
 
DotBrand (08/2011) - VAYTON
DotBrand (08/2011) - VAYTONDotBrand (08/2011) - VAYTON
DotBrand (08/2011) - VAYTON
 
Managing IP -- New Tlds
Managing IP -- New TldsManaging IP -- New Tlds
Managing IP -- New Tlds
 
Coghead Overview 21 Aug08
Coghead Overview 21 Aug08Coghead Overview 21 Aug08
Coghead Overview 21 Aug08
 
Open Source and the New Economics of IT - Ingres CIO Doug Harr
Open Source and the New Economics of IT - Ingres CIO Doug HarrOpen Source and the New Economics of IT - Ingres CIO Doug Harr
Open Source and the New Economics of IT - Ingres CIO Doug Harr
 
Melbourne IT - iStrategy Atlanta
Melbourne IT - iStrategy AtlantaMelbourne IT - iStrategy Atlanta
Melbourne IT - iStrategy Atlanta
 
Karen Forster Top 10 IT Costs
Karen Forster Top 10 IT CostsKaren Forster Top 10 IT Costs
Karen Forster Top 10 IT Costs
 
What Do New TLDs Mean for your Hosting Business?
What Do New TLDs Mean for your Hosting Business?What Do New TLDs Mean for your Hosting Business?
What Do New TLDs Mean for your Hosting Business?
 
Melbourneit Brandowners
Melbourneit BrandownersMelbourneit Brandowners
Melbourneit Brandowners
 
Amazon Case Study Paper
Amazon Case Study PaperAmazon Case Study Paper
Amazon Case Study Paper
 
RAMAKANT
RAMAKANTRAMAKANT
RAMAKANT
 
Big Data and Marketing Technology
Big Data and Marketing TechnologyBig Data and Marketing Technology
Big Data and Marketing Technology
 
Browser Diagnostics using dynatrace Ajax Edition
Browser Diagnostics using dynatrace Ajax EditionBrowser Diagnostics using dynatrace Ajax Edition
Browser Diagnostics using dynatrace Ajax Edition
 
About smartData
About smartDataAbout smartData
About smartData
 
Business Plan
Business PlanBusiness Plan
Business Plan
 
SaaS – A risk or opportunity for software vendors?
SaaS – A risk or opportunity for software vendors?SaaS – A risk or opportunity for software vendors?
SaaS – A risk or opportunity for software vendors?
 
Software Licensing & Compliance: Two Strategies, One Goal
Software Licensing & Compliance: Two Strategies, One GoalSoftware Licensing & Compliance: Two Strategies, One Goal
Software Licensing & Compliance: Two Strategies, One Goal
 
Biz model 4 method of value capture
Biz model 4   method of value captureBiz model 4   method of value capture
Biz model 4 method of value capture
 

Dernier

Architecting Cloud Native Applications
Architecting Cloud Native ApplicationsArchitecting Cloud Native Applications
Architecting Cloud Native Applications
WSO2
 

Dernier (20)

Understanding the FAA Part 107 License ..
Understanding the FAA Part 107 License ..Understanding the FAA Part 107 License ..
Understanding the FAA Part 107 License ..
 
Six Myths about Ontologies: The Basics of Formal Ontology
Six Myths about Ontologies: The Basics of Formal OntologySix Myths about Ontologies: The Basics of Formal Ontology
Six Myths about Ontologies: The Basics of Formal Ontology
 
Boost Fertility New Invention Ups Success Rates.pdf
Boost Fertility New Invention Ups Success Rates.pdfBoost Fertility New Invention Ups Success Rates.pdf
Boost Fertility New Invention Ups Success Rates.pdf
 
Architecting Cloud Native Applications
Architecting Cloud Native ApplicationsArchitecting Cloud Native Applications
Architecting Cloud Native Applications
 
MINDCTI Revenue Release Quarter One 2024
MINDCTI Revenue Release Quarter One 2024MINDCTI Revenue Release Quarter One 2024
MINDCTI Revenue Release Quarter One 2024
 
Platformless Horizons for Digital Adaptability
Platformless Horizons for Digital AdaptabilityPlatformless Horizons for Digital Adaptability
Platformless Horizons for Digital Adaptability
 
Apidays New York 2024 - Scaling API-first by Ian Reasor and Radu Cotescu, Adobe
Apidays New York 2024 - Scaling API-first by Ian Reasor and Radu Cotescu, AdobeApidays New York 2024 - Scaling API-first by Ian Reasor and Radu Cotescu, Adobe
Apidays New York 2024 - Scaling API-first by Ian Reasor and Radu Cotescu, Adobe
 
Corporate and higher education May webinar.pptx
Corporate and higher education May webinar.pptxCorporate and higher education May webinar.pptx
Corporate and higher education May webinar.pptx
 
presentation ICT roal in 21st century education
presentation ICT roal in 21st century educationpresentation ICT roal in 21st century education
presentation ICT roal in 21st century education
 
AWS Community Day CPH - Three problems of Terraform
AWS Community Day CPH - Three problems of TerraformAWS Community Day CPH - Three problems of Terraform
AWS Community Day CPH - Three problems of Terraform
 
EMPOWERMENT TECHNOLOGY GRADE 11 QUARTER 2 REVIEWER
EMPOWERMENT TECHNOLOGY GRADE 11 QUARTER 2 REVIEWEREMPOWERMENT TECHNOLOGY GRADE 11 QUARTER 2 REVIEWER
EMPOWERMENT TECHNOLOGY GRADE 11 QUARTER 2 REVIEWER
 
Introduction to Multilingual Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG)
Introduction to Multilingual Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG)Introduction to Multilingual Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG)
Introduction to Multilingual Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG)
 
Apidays New York 2024 - Accelerating FinTech Innovation by Vasa Krishnan, Fin...
Apidays New York 2024 - Accelerating FinTech Innovation by Vasa Krishnan, Fin...Apidays New York 2024 - Accelerating FinTech Innovation by Vasa Krishnan, Fin...
Apidays New York 2024 - Accelerating FinTech Innovation by Vasa Krishnan, Fin...
 
ICT role in 21st century education and its challenges
ICT role in 21st century education and its challengesICT role in 21st century education and its challenges
ICT role in 21st century education and its challenges
 
Connector Corner: Accelerate revenue generation using UiPath API-centric busi...
Connector Corner: Accelerate revenue generation using UiPath API-centric busi...Connector Corner: Accelerate revenue generation using UiPath API-centric busi...
Connector Corner: Accelerate revenue generation using UiPath API-centric busi...
 
MS Copilot expands with MS Graph connectors
MS Copilot expands with MS Graph connectorsMS Copilot expands with MS Graph connectors
MS Copilot expands with MS Graph connectors
 
Vector Search -An Introduction in Oracle Database 23ai.pptx
Vector Search -An Introduction in Oracle Database 23ai.pptxVector Search -An Introduction in Oracle Database 23ai.pptx
Vector Search -An Introduction in Oracle Database 23ai.pptx
 
Strategize a Smooth Tenant-to-tenant Migration and Copilot Takeoff
Strategize a Smooth Tenant-to-tenant Migration and Copilot TakeoffStrategize a Smooth Tenant-to-tenant Migration and Copilot Takeoff
Strategize a Smooth Tenant-to-tenant Migration and Copilot Takeoff
 
DBX First Quarter 2024 Investor Presentation
DBX First Quarter 2024 Investor PresentationDBX First Quarter 2024 Investor Presentation
DBX First Quarter 2024 Investor Presentation
 
TrustArc Webinar - Unlock the Power of AI-Driven Data Discovery
TrustArc Webinar - Unlock the Power of AI-Driven Data DiscoveryTrustArc Webinar - Unlock the Power of AI-Driven Data Discovery
TrustArc Webinar - Unlock the Power of AI-Driven Data Discovery
 

Tt dot brand march 2011

  • 1. DOT BRAND – NEW GTLDS Application Concept of Use Operations March 2011
  • 2. Dot Brand Overall Issues to Address... 1 2 3 .Brand Apply? How to use it? Is it worth the money? Are we in danger of others applying for a TLD that will block for us? Will a .brand TLD be the norm? Will consumers expect a .brand ? Application Operations Concept of Use What is the procedure? What is the timeline? What are the external costs? What is history and current status? How to run dot Brand? What are the requirements?How to Roll Out? What to outsource? What are the costs? What is the Mission? How are we going to use and promote dot Brand? What are benefits and risks? Choice of providersWho will be able to deliver best product for us? Back-end:
  • 3. New gTLDs What is this all about? 1 2 3 ICANN: ”In a world with over 1.6 billion internet users - and growing - diversity, choice and competition are key to the continued success and reach of the global network.” Kurt Pritz, Senior Vice President of Services at ICANN: “…perhaps 5,000 new gTLDs could be added by 2015…”
  • 4. New gTLDs .brand. city .region .businessarea and IDN (non Latin Script) 1 2 3
  • 5. New gTLDs Today and Future – maybe 500 new gTLDs 1 2 3 Today: www.nikeshoes.com Future: shoes.nike or football.nike Today: Domain name registration with domain name registrar Future: Brands control OWN top level domain. Example: ”.Nike” – NIKE controls the policy and rules. I.e. Only NIKE company and agents can register a .Nike domain name. Maybe: shoes.nike, city.nike, woman.nike, kids.nike....
  • 6. DOT BRAND TLD Time Line - Application Q3, 2011 Launch in 2012 1 2 3 Timeline Final Applicant Guidebook published May 30 Board Approval of new gTLD Program June 20 Application period (3 months) is expected to start October/Nov Evaluation (5 months minimum) Registry Agreement and Test (2-3 months) Launch 8-19 Months after application Launch Q4 2012- Q3 2013 Uncertainties: How will GAC react on Board Feed back? How will ICANN Board react on public comments and various stakeholder comments/positions? Will the Program be postponed once more? IF APPROVED: Number of applications (criteria for batches of 500 ??) Number of contention sets Objections Extended Review Testing
  • 7. Application Application and Evaluation Processes are somewhat complex 1 2 3 Application: Evaluation is a complicated process. Path for community based application differs from path of standard application. Second evaluation if public objection. Ultimately an auction might be decisive.
  • 8. Application Application and Evaluation Processes are somewhat complex 1 2 3 Evaluation String Reviews String similarity Reserved names DNS stability Geographic names Applicant Reviews Demonstration of technical and operational capability Demonstration of financial capability Registry services reviews for DNS stability issues Public objection criteria - which cause second evaluation: Existing legal rights, string confusion, morality or violation of a community Similarity amongst applications (Contention Sets) Identical and visually similar strings If at least two of the applications are community based a comparative evaluation might be decisive If no clear winner is found an auction will be decisive Auction if both applications are “standard” applications
  • 9. Concept of Use Why and who? 1 2 3 Mission? There are many reasons for applying – depending on who you are and what you want to achieve. Who? Brand owners who want to promote brands Brand owners for defensive reasons Brand owners wanting to dominate a generic term – i.e. ”.beer”, ”.insurance”, ”.pharma” Brand owners who want to tie customers closer to their company – ISPs offering free domains incl emails under own TLD. Brand owners who want to track product – i.e. ”serialnumber.brand” Entrepreneurs who want to compete with known TLDs - .sport, .hotel etc. Cities and governments - .berlin, .bayern, .africa Communities who want to create an environment for their (minority) community - .surf, .gay, .cym etc. Type of application – standard or community - will be based/assessed upon the applicant’s written concept of use and the eventual definition of the ”community.”
  • 10.
  • 12. Added Value Services (product.brand, branch.brand, service.brand consumer.brand)
  • 14. Communities for consumers and fans?
  • 15. Secure space for consumers?
  • 18.
  • 19. Trusted environment for customers, partners, employees etc.
  • 20. Independency from registrars
  • 21. Marginal risk that someone will register .brnad (as typo)
  • 22.
  • 23. A relevant TLD will most likely be ranked higher in search engines
  • 24. Give away domains like or name.brand or reseller.brand where terms and conditions, history, reports are available and registrations can be made
  • 25. First Mover Advantage - Consumers may find it cool!
  • 26. Will consumers expect large brands to operate .brand?
  • 28.
  • 29. Risk of losing premium term (having to choose alternative ”string” – i.e. abreviation)
  • 30. Risk that investment will be worthless (betamax vs. VHS)
  • 31. Risk that end users and search engines will never adapt
  • 32. Risk that competitor occupies generic term (.pharma)
  • 33.
  • 34. ICANN fee may well be lower in second round.
  • 35. Best practice will be established.
  • 36.
  • 37. New TLDs will change the internet - register relevant names and monitor infringements.
  • 38.
  • 39. IPV6, DNSSEC, EPP, Web Interface for registrars and registrants
  • 40. DNS infrastructure – security, resilience and load capacity (ddos attacks etc.)
  • 41.
  • 43.
  • 44. Wrap Up – dot Brand Facts and Considerations .Brand We believe that the new TLDs will change end user and search engine behavior. Concept of Use Application: Operational: Timeline – 2011? Financial Technical Operational skills Costs: Min $ 400.000 plus internal resources High Technical Requirements Phased Launch Outsourcing of Operations Costs: minimum $ 120.000 plus internal resources Mission Promote Brand Protect IP Rights Brand only Policy? PR? Roll Out Plan? Concept and internal resources influence choice of service providers and degree of outsourcing We recommend that you consider purpose, security, price and scalability before choosing back-end providers Back-end: