SlideShare une entreprise Scribd logo
1  sur  4
Télécharger pour lire hors ligne
Washington D.C.’s Plan for Clean Water: Is the District On Track?
Residents in the region are starting to see the benefits of investments and improvements made in
local waterways and the Chesapeake Bay. The practices that protect and restore our waterways—
tree plantings, polluted runoff infiltration practices, urban stream restoration, and upgrades to waste-
water treatment plants—ultimately improve our quality of life by reducing flooding, securing healthier
drinking water, beautifying our neighborhoods, and ensuring safer waters for recreation. Unfortu-
nately, despite making progress, the Chesapeake Bay watershed still remains a system dangerously
out of balance. Too much nitrogen, phosphorus, and sediment pollution continues to run off our
lawns and city streets, and into local streams, the Potomac River, and the Bay.
In 2010, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Bay jurisdictions established science-
based limits for these pollutants and state-specific plans to achieve them, together known as the
Chesapeake Clean Water Blueprint. EPA, the states, and Washington, D.C., also committed to implement
actions to achieve 60 percent of the needed reductions by 2017 and 100 percent by 2025.
To ensure these clean-water efforts stay on track, each of the states and Washington, D.C., committed to
two-year goals or milestones detailing the programs and practices intended to be met in the near-term to
achieve the 2017 and 2025 long-term goals. The milestones are a critical accountability tool, providing the
opportunity to measure progress in the context of long-term Bay restoration efforts. Because of the impor-
tance of the milestones, the Chesapeake Bay Foundation and the Choose Clean Water Coalition are collab-
orating to evaluate and publicize pollution-reduction progress. This report evaluates, for select practices,
whether Washington, D.C., achieved its 2012/2013 two-year milestone goals and whether or not this
progress is on a trajectory to achieve 60 percent implementation by 2015 and full implementation by 2025.
Conclusion
Washington, D.C., has exceeded 2013 goals for four out of the six practices selected for evaluation. Wash-
ington, D.C., compensated for its two unachieved milestones by exceeding goals in other, more efficient,
practices like infiltration practices and impervious surface reduction. We commend D.C. leaders and the
District Department of the Environment (DDOE) for achieving their clean-up reductions early and setting
more stringent expectations under the Sustainable D.C. Plan.
However, we urge Washington, D.C., to recognize the value of setting bi-annual milestones that reflect its
implementation plans so that reported data accurately represents D.C.’s commitment to pollution reduc-
tions. The District will need to account for substantial commitments remaining in impervious surface re-
ductions, tree planting, and urban stream restoration. As such, DDOE has developed ambitious milestone
goals for 2015 that will encourage significant progress toward D.C.’s 2025 goals.
In addition, the District must redouble efforts to reduce nitrogen pollution. Recent efforts like the 2012
passage of fertilizer regulations, a commitment to fifteen-million-square feet of urban polluted runoff retrofits
per year, and increased incentives for landowners to manage runoff, will reduce nitrogen pollution.
We commend DDOE for adopting the new polluted runoff rule and wetlands regulations in 2013, imple-
menting a new credit trading policy, and consolidating polluted runoff permit implementation plans.
Washington, D.C., has established itself as a regional and national leader through its commitment to
pollution reduction. We call on the mayor-elect for a formal commitment to clean-water plans within
established deadlines.
June 2014
AT A GLANCE
Urban/Suburban
Urban Tree Planting
Stormwater
Infiltration Practices
Stormwater Ponds
Street Sweeping
Impervious Surface
Reduction
Urban Stream
Restoration
See the charts on the inside of
this sheet for more information.
For more detailed information
on all of Washington, D.C.’s
milestone goals, go to:
www.epa.gov/reg3wapd/
tmdl/Chesapeake Bay/Ensur-
ingResults.html.
2012/2013 FINAL ASSESSMENT
Washington, D.C.
Milestones
6 Herndon Avenue | Annapolis, Maryland 21403
888/SAVEBAY | cbf.org
How this Report was Compiled
We selected a subset of implemented practices within two
pollution source categories—urban/suburban sources and waste-
water treatment—based on their potential to provide substantial
nitrogen, phosphorus, and sediment pollution reductions and
offer important lessons for implementation moving forward. For
each practice, progress (% achievement) was evaluated by looking
at incremental progress between the base year, 2011, and 2013,
compared to the 2013 milestone goal. Progress during this mile-
stone period was also compared to the long-term (2017 and
2025) implementation benchmarks that the states and Washing-
ton, D.C., committed to in their Watershed Implementation
Plans. Data were provided by the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency’s Chesapeake Bay Program Office.
706 Giddings Avenue 1-B | Annapolis, Maryland 21401
443/759-3400 | choosecleanwater.org
Pollution Reduction in Washington, D.C., at a Glance
Washington, D.C., has seen net reductions in nitrogen, phos-
phorus, and sediment pollution. However, nitrogen and sedi-
ment load reductions from the urban sector are not on track
to meet the long-term goals. This should be of greatest concern
to Washington, D.C., leaders as the population grows and cre-
ates pressures that exacerbate polluted runoff.
Success Story
Canal Park is a new public community natural space in the heart
of the recently revitalized Capital Riverfront area of southeast Wash-
ington, D.C.The award-winning park’s design incorporates advanced
sustainability features for polluted-runoff management and water
use. Canal Park is an example of what diverse public and private
partnerships can accomplish in the name of cleaner waterways and
community revival.Today,Washington, D.C., residents can enjoy this
public natural space while its aesthetic environmental site design
improves the natural environment.
This historic park was first conceptualized in the late 1990s when
The W.C. Smith Company purchased and invested in land along the
Washington Canal that largely consisted of vacant lots and aban-
doned warehouses.Today, this once-desolate area is a redeveloped,
river-friendly community, bringing economic prosperity back to the
southeast region of the city.
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
2025201720132011
2025
GOAL
POLLUTED RUNOFF
WASTEWATER
2017
GOAL
Modeled Nitrogen Loads and Long Term Goals in
Washington, D.C., by Sector (thousands of pounds)
Source: Chesapeake Bay Program Watershed Model 5.3.2
0
20
40
60
80
120
2025201720132011
POLLUTED RUNOFF
100
2025
GOAL
WASTEWATER
2017
GOAL
Modeled Phosphorus Loads and Long Term Goals in
Washington, D.C., by Sector (thousands of pounds)
Washington, D.C., has already exceeded its 2025 nitrogen-reduction goals by
220 percent. However, D.C. has only secured 4 percent of its 2017 nitrogen-
reduction goal from urban runoff. Though D.C. has met its 2025 nitrogen
reductions through wastewater treatment,it must accelerate efforts to address
the greater challenge of polluted runoff.
As of 2013, Washington, D.C.’s, total phosphorus load is decreasing, but it has
only achieved 33 percent of its 2025 goal for phosphorus reductions from pol-
luted runoff.We encourageWashington,D.C.,to commit to achieving these phos-
phorus reductions for polluted runoff despite exceeding total reduction goals.
*Pollution reduction is ahead of schedule for this sector.
*
*
Assessment of D.C.’s Progress on Selected Pollution-Reduction Practices for 2013
Urban Stream Restoration feet
This milestone was exceeded, though D.C. saw no increase in stream
restoration between 2012 and 2013 due to permitting obstacles.DDOE
will restore roughly 28,000 additional square feet by 2016.D.C.has made
honorable commitments to restoring and planting an additional 50 percent of
wetlands that will provide resiliency in riverside and streamside communities.
0
10,000
30,000
50,000
2011 2015 2019 2021 2023
40,000
2013 2017
G
2025
G
20,000
Progress Relative to Long-Term Goals (feet)
Urban/Suburban
Polluted Runoff
Impervious Surface (e.g. roads, roofs, etc.) Reduction acres
The Sustainable D.C.Plan calls for 75 percent of the District’s landscape
to capture rainwater for filtration and reuse by 2032.We commend the
District’s Department of the Environment for accelerating the pace in its
2014-2015 draft Milestones. This will address the significant commitments in
D.C.’s Watershed Implementation Plan to reduce or retrofit impervious surfaces.
This reduction will be instrumental toward mitigating growing urban runoff rates.
0
500
1,000
3,500
2011 2015 2019 2021 2023
1,500
2013 2017 2025
G
2,000
2,500
3,000
Progress Relative to Long-Term Goals (acres)
67 (2-YEAR INCREMENTAL PROGRESS)
50 (2-YEAR INCREMENTAL MILESTONE)
= 134%
Urban Tree Planting acres
AlthoughWashington,D.C.,continues to exceed its milestone goals,a re-
doubling of efforts is necessary to accomplish the Sustainable D.C.Plan
goal of 8,600 new trees planted each year by 2032.To prepare for the
projected influx of new residents and the additional pollution they will contribute,
Washington,D.C.,strives to increase its urban tree canopy to 40 percent coverage.
0
300
900
1,500
2011 2015 2019 2021 2023
1,200
2013 2017 2025
600
Progress Relative to Long-Term Goals (acres)
201 (2-YEAR INCREMENTAL PROGRESS)
65 (2-YEAR INCREMENTAL MILESTONE)
= 309%
Stormwater (Polluted Runoff) Infiltration Practices* acres
Washington, D.C., annually surpasses its milestone goals for traditional
polluted runoff practices.Yet overall,nitrogen,phosphorus,and sediment
pollution from urban runoff are not on track to meet 2017 and 2025
target reductions. Infiltration is an extremely effective practice and helps achive
requirements of the polluted runoff permit and regulations. We believe these
goals could be more agressive.
0
500
1,000
2,000
2011 2015 2019 2021 2023
1,500
2013 2017 2025
G
Progress Relative to Long-Term Goals (acres)
316 (2-YEAR INCREMENTAL PROGRESS)
70 (2-YEAR INCREMENTAL MILESTONE)
= 451%
Stormwater (Polluted Runoff) Ponds** acres
The District’s new polluted runoff rule, released in July of 2013, insti-
tuted performance standards for superior retention on large develop-
ment sites. This will lead to greater runoff reductions when the rule
soon goes into effect.We call onWashington,D.C.,to avoid a third consecutive
year of failing to meet milestone goals for stormwater ponds in 2015.
0
300
900
1,500
2011 2015 2019 2021 2023
1,200
2013 2017 2025
600
Progress Relative to Long-Term Goals (acres)
114 (2-YEAR INCREMENTAL PROGRES)
122 (2-YEAR INCREMENTAL MILESTONE)
= 93%
Street Sweeping acres
According to the Chesapeake Bay Program (CBP) data, two percent
fewer streets were treated in 2013 than in 2011, but the District De-
partment of the Environment (DDOE) raised concerns that this was
inaccurate.We commend the District for exceeding its 2025 deadline require-
ment early in 2010, but we call on CBP and DDOE to work together to ensure
consistency in reported data.
0
500
1,000
2,500
2011 2015 2019 2021 2023
1,500
2013 2017 2025
G
2,000
Progress Relative to Long-Term Goals (acres)
-14 (2-YEAR INCREMENTAL PROGRESS)
828 (2-YEAR INCREMENTAL MILESTONE)
= -2%
**Wetponds & wetlands, dry ponds, extended dry ponds. *Infiltration practices, filtering practices, bioretention, and bioswale.
2,150 (2-YEAR INCREMENTAL PROGRESS)
566 (2-YEAR INCREMENTAL MILESTONE)
= 380%
P 2-YEAR INCREMENTAL PROGRESS M 2-YEAR INCREMENTAL MILESTONE
P
M
P
M
P
M
P
M
P
M
P
M
P
M
P
M
P
M
P
M
P
M
P
M
MILESTONEPROGRESS MILESTONEPROGRESS MILESTONEPROGRESS MILESTONEPROGRESS
MILESTONEPROGRESSMILESTONEPROGRESS
Assessment of D.C.’s Progress on Selected Pollution-Reduction Practices for 2013
Urban Stream Restoration feet
This milestone was exceeded, though D.C. saw no increase in stream
restoration between 2012 and 2013 due to permitting obstacles.DDOE
will restore roughly 28,000 additional square feet by 2016.D.C.has made
honorable commitments to restoring and planting an additional 50 percent of
wetlands that will provide resiliency in riverside and streamside communities.
0
10,000
30,000
50,000
2011 2015 2019 2021 2023
40,000
2013 2017
G
2025
G
20,000
Progress Relative to Long-Term Goals (feet)
Urban/Suburban
Polluted Runoff
Impervious Surface (e.g. roads, roofs, etc.) Reduction acres
The Sustainable D.C.Plan calls for 75 percent of the District’s landscape
to capture rainwater for filtration and reuse by 2032.We commend the
District’s Department of the Environment for accelerating the pace in its
2014-2015 draft Milestones. This will address the significant commitments in
D.C.’s Watershed Implementation Plan to reduce or retrofit impervious surfaces.
This reduction will be instrumental toward mitigating growing urban runoff rates.
0
500
1,000
3,500
2011 2015 2019 2021 2023
1,500
2013 2017 2025
G
2,000
2,500
3,000
Progress Relative to Long-Term Goals (acres)
67 (2-YEAR INCREMENTAL PROGRESS)
50 (2-YEAR INCREMENTAL MILESTONE)
= 134%
Urban Tree Planting acres
AlthoughWashington,D.C.,continues to exceed its milestone goals,a re-
doubling of efforts is necessary to accomplish the Sustainable D.C.Plan
goal of 8,600 new trees planted each year by 2032.To prepare for the
projected influx of new residents and the additional pollution they will contribute,
Washington,D.C.,strives to increase its urban tree canopy to 40 percent coverage.
0
300
900
1,500
2011 2015 2019 2021 2023
1,200
2013 2017 2025
600
Progress Relative to Long-Term Goals (acres)
201 (2-YEAR INCREMENTAL PROGRESS)
65 (2-YEAR INCREMENTAL MILESTONE)
= 309%
Stormwater (Polluted Runoff) Infiltration Practices* acres
Washington, D.C., annually surpasses its milestone goals for traditional
polluted runoff practices.Yet overall,nitrogen,phosphorus,and sediment
pollution from urban runoff are not on track to meet 2017 and 2025
target reductions. Infiltration is an extremely effective practice and helps achive
requirements of the polluted runoff permit and regulations. We believe these
goals could be more agressive.
0
500
1,000
2,000
2011 2015 2019 2021 2023
1,500
2013 2017 2025
G
Progress Relative to Long-Term Goals (acres)
316 (2-YEAR INCREMENTAL PROGRESS)
70 (2-YEAR INCREMENTAL MILESTONE)
= 451%
Stormwater (Polluted Runoff) Ponds** acres
The District’s new polluted runoff rule, released in July of 2013, insti-
tuted performance standards for superior retention on large develop-
ment sites. This will lead to greater runoff reductions when the rule
soon goes into effect.We call onWashington,D.C.,to avoid a third consecutive
year of failing to meet milestone goals for stormwater ponds in 2015.
0
300
900
1,500
2011 2015 2019 2021 2023
1,200
2013 2017 2025
600
Progress Relative to Long-Term Goals (acres)
114 (2-YEAR INCREMENTAL PROGRES)
122 (2-YEAR INCREMENTAL MILESTONE)
= 93%
Street Sweeping acres
According to the Chesapeake Bay Program (CBP) data, two percent
fewer streets were treated in 2013 than in 2011, but the District De-
partment of the Environment (DDOE) raised concerns that this was
inaccurate.We commend the District for exceeding its 2025 deadline require-
ment early in 2010, but we call on CBP and DDOE to work together to ensure
consistency in reported data.
0
500
1,000
2,500
2011 2015 2019 2021 2023
1,500
2013 2017 2025
G
2,000
Progress Relative to Long-Term Goals (acres)
-14 (2-YEAR INCREMENTAL PROGRESS)
828 (2-YEAR INCREMENTAL MILESTONE)
= -2%
**Wetponds & wetlands, dry ponds, extended dry ponds. *Infiltration practices, filtering practices, bioretention, and bioswale.
2,150 (2-YEAR INCREMENTAL PROGRESS)
566 (2-YEAR INCREMENTAL MILESTONE)
= 380%
P 2-YEAR INCREMENTAL PROGRESS M 2-YEAR INCREMENTAL MILESTONE
P
M
P
M
P
M
P
M
P
M
P
M
P
M
P
M
P
M
P
M
P
M
P
M
MILESTONEPROGRESS MILESTONEPROGRESS MILESTONEPROGRESS MILESTONEPROGRESS
MILESTONEPROGRESSMILESTONEPROGRESS
Washington D.C.’s Plan for Clean Water: Is the District On Track?
Residents in the region are starting to see the benefits of investments and improvements made in
local waterways and the Chesapeake Bay. The practices that protect and restore our waterways—
tree plantings, polluted runoff infiltration practices, urban stream restoration, and upgrades to waste-
water treatment plants—ultimately improve our quality of life by reducing flooding, securing healthier
drinking water, beautifying our neighborhoods, and ensuring safer waters for recreation. Unfortu-
nately, despite making progress, the Chesapeake Bay watershed still remains a system dangerously
out of balance. Too much nitrogen, phosphorus, and sediment pollution continues to run off our
lawns and city streets, and into local streams, the Potomac River, and the Bay.
In 2010, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Bay jurisdictions established science-
based limits for these pollutants and state-specific plans to achieve them, together known as the
Chesapeake Clean Water Blueprint. EPA, the states, and Washington, D.C., also committed to implement
actions to achieve 60 percent of the needed reductions by 2017 and 100 percent by 2025.
To ensure these clean-water efforts stay on track, each of the states and Washington, D.C., committed to
two-year goals or milestones detailing the programs and practices intended to be met in the near-term to
achieve the 2017 and 2025 long-term goals. The milestones are a critical accountability tool, providing the
opportunity to measure progress in the context of long-term Bay restoration efforts. Because of the impor-
tance of the milestones, the Chesapeake Bay Foundation and the Choose Clean Water Coalition are collab-
orating to evaluate and publicize pollution-reduction progress. This report evaluates, for select practices,
whether Washington, D.C., achieved its 2012/2013 two-year milestone goals and whether or not this
progress is on a trajectory to achieve 60 percent implementation by 2015 and full implementation by 2025.
Conclusion
Washington, D.C., has exceeded 2013 goals for four out of the six practices selected for evaluation. Wash-
ington, D.C., compensated for its two unachieved milestones by exceeding goals in other, more efficient,
practices like infiltration practices and impervious surface reduction. We commend D.C. leaders and the
District Department of the Environment (DDOE) for achieving their clean-up reductions early and setting
more stringent expectations under the Sustainable D.C. Plan.
However, we urge Washington, D.C., to recognize the value of setting bi-annual milestones that reflect its
implementation plans so that reported data accurately represents D.C.’s commitment to pollution reduc-
tions. The District will need to account for substantial commitments remaining in impervious surface re-
ductions, tree planting, and urban stream restoration. As such, DDOE has developed ambitious milestone
goals for 2015 that will encourage significant progress toward D.C.’s 2025 goals.
In addition, the District must redouble efforts to reduce nitrogen pollution. Recent efforts like the 2012
passage of fertilizer regulations, a commitment to fifteen-million-square feet of urban polluted runoff retrofits
per year, and increased incentives for landowners to manage runoff, will reduce nitrogen pollution.
We commend DDOE for adopting the new polluted runoff rule and wetlands regulations in 2013, imple-
menting a new credit trading policy, and consolidating polluted runoff permit implementation plans.
Washington, D.C., has established itself as a regional and national leader through its commitment to
pollution reduction. We call on the mayor-elect for a formal commitment to clean-water plans within
established deadlines.
June 2014
AT A GLANCE
Urban/Suburban
Urban Tree Planting
Stormwater
Infiltration Practices
Stormwater Ponds
Street Sweeping
Impervious Surface
Reduction
Urban Stream
Restoration
See the charts on the inside of
this sheet for more information.
For more detailed information
on all of Washington, D.C.’s
milestone goals, go to:
www.epa.gov/reg3wapd/
tmdl/Chesapeake Bay/Ensur-
ingResults.html.
2012/2013 FINAL ASSESSMENT
Washington, D.C.
Milestones
6 Herndon Avenue | Annapolis, Maryland 21403
888/SAVEBAY | cbf.org
How this Report was Compiled
We selected a subset of implemented practices within two
pollution source categories—urban/suburban sources and waste-
water treatment—based on their potential to provide substantial
nitrogen, phosphorus, and sediment pollution reductions and
offer important lessons for implementation moving forward. For
each practice, progress (% achievement) was evaluated by looking
at incremental progress between the base year, 2011, and 2013,
compared to the 2013 milestone goal. Progress during this mile-
stone period was also compared to the long-term (2017 and
2025) implementation benchmarks that the states and Washing-
ton, D.C., committed to in their Watershed Implementation
Plans. Data were provided by the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency’s Chesapeake Bay Program Office.
706 Giddings Avenue 1-B | Annapolis, Maryland 21401
443/759-3400 | choosecleanwater.org
Pollution Reduction in Washington, D.C., at a Glance
Washington, D.C., has seen net reductions in nitrogen, phos-
phorus, and sediment pollution. However, nitrogen and sedi-
ment load reductions from the urban sector are not on track
to meet the long-term goals. This should be of greatest concern
to Washington, D.C., leaders as the population grows and cre-
ates pressures that exacerbate polluted runoff.
Success Story
Canal Park is a new public community natural space in the heart
of the recently revitalized Capital Riverfront area of southeast Wash-
ington, D.C.The award-winning park’s design incorporates advanced
sustainability features for polluted-runoff management and water
use. Canal Park is an example of what diverse public and private
partnerships can accomplish in the name of cleaner waterways and
community revival.Today,Washington, D.C., residents can enjoy this
public natural space while its aesthetic environmental site design
improves the natural environment.
This historic park was first conceptualized in the late 1990s when
The W.C. Smith Company purchased and invested in land along the
Washington Canal that largely consisted of vacant lots and aban-
doned warehouses.Today, this once-desolate area is a redeveloped,
river-friendly community, bringing economic prosperity back to the
southeast region of the city.
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
2025201720132011
2025
GOAL
POLLUTED RUNOFF
WASTEWATER
2017
GOAL
Modeled Nitrogen Loads and Long Term Goals in
Washington, D.C., by Sector (thousands of pounds)
Source: Chesapeake Bay Program Watershed Model 5.3.2
0
20
40
60
80
120
2025201720132011
POLLUTED RUNOFF
100
2025
GOAL
WASTEWATER
2017
GOAL
Modeled Phosphorus Loads and Long Term Goals in
Washington, D.C., by Sector (thousands of pounds)
Washington, D.C., has already exceeded its 2025 nitrogen-reduction goals by
220 percent. However, D.C. has only secured 4 percent of its 2017 nitrogen-
reduction goal from urban runoff. Though D.C. has met its 2025 nitrogen
reductions through wastewater treatment,it must accelerate efforts to address
the greater challenge of polluted runoff.
As of 2013, Washington, D.C.’s, total phosphorus load is decreasing, but it has
only achieved 33 percent of its 2025 goal for phosphorus reductions from pol-
luted runoff.We encourageWashington,D.C.,to commit to achieving these phos-
phorus reductions for polluted runoff despite exceeding total reduction goals.
*Pollution reduction is ahead of schedule for this sector.
*
*

Contenu connexe

Tendances

Lawn Conversion Policy
Lawn Conversion PolicyLawn Conversion Policy
Lawn Conversion PolicyAlex Shoor
 
Water Indicators
Water IndicatorsWater Indicators
Water IndicatorsFAO
 
Developing and Implementing a Vision for the Future of Water Supply in Kansas
Developing and Implementing a Vision for the Future of Water Supply in KansasDeveloping and Implementing a Vision for the Future of Water Supply in Kansas
Developing and Implementing a Vision for the Future of Water Supply in KansasMatt Unruh
 
Efficient Use of Water - Drew Beckwith, Western Resources Associates
Efficient Use of Water - Drew Beckwith, Western Resources AssociatesEfficient Use of Water - Drew Beckwith, Western Resources Associates
Efficient Use of Water - Drew Beckwith, Western Resources Associatesrshimoda2014
 
Innovative Policies to Optimize the Allocation of Water Quality and Conservat...
Innovative Policies to Optimize the Allocation of Water Quality and Conservat...Innovative Policies to Optimize the Allocation of Water Quality and Conservat...
Innovative Policies to Optimize the Allocation of Water Quality and Conservat...National Institute of Food and Agriculture
 
Factors Affecting Adoption of Nutrient Management Practices by Farmers and Ho...
Factors Affecting Adoption of Nutrient Management Practices by Farmers and Ho...Factors Affecting Adoption of Nutrient Management Practices by Farmers and Ho...
Factors Affecting Adoption of Nutrient Management Practices by Farmers and Ho...National Institute of Food and Agriculture
 
Kings Basin Report
Kings Basin ReportKings Basin Report
Kings Basin ReportLucas Patzek
 
Chapter 9 sustainibility of water resources
Chapter 9 sustainibility of water resourcesChapter 9 sustainibility of water resources
Chapter 9 sustainibility of water resourcesMohammed Salahat
 
1. Addressing Ireland's Water challenges, the National Response - Feargal O C...
1. Addressing Ireland's Water challenges, the National Response - Feargal O C...1. Addressing Ireland's Water challenges, the National Response - Feargal O C...
1. Addressing Ireland's Water challenges, the National Response - Feargal O C...Environmental Protection Agency, Ireland
 

Tendances (20)

Lawn Conversion Policy
Lawn Conversion PolicyLawn Conversion Policy
Lawn Conversion Policy
 
Watershed scale conservation
Watershed scale conservationWatershed scale conservation
Watershed scale conservation
 
Moving Forward on Agricultural Water Conservation in the Colorado River Basin
Moving Forward on Agricultural Water Conservation in the Colorado River BasinMoving Forward on Agricultural Water Conservation in the Colorado River Basin
Moving Forward on Agricultural Water Conservation in the Colorado River Basin
 
Water Indicators
Water IndicatorsWater Indicators
Water Indicators
 
Developing and Implementing a Vision for the Future of Water Supply in Kansas
Developing and Implementing a Vision for the Future of Water Supply in KansasDeveloping and Implementing a Vision for the Future of Water Supply in Kansas
Developing and Implementing a Vision for the Future of Water Supply in Kansas
 
Efficient Use of Water - Drew Beckwith, Western Resources Associates
Efficient Use of Water - Drew Beckwith, Western Resources AssociatesEfficient Use of Water - Drew Beckwith, Western Resources Associates
Efficient Use of Water - Drew Beckwith, Western Resources Associates
 
National Water Quality Initiative
National Water Quality InitiativeNational Water Quality Initiative
National Water Quality Initiative
 
July 29-210-Joe Lee
July 29-210-Joe LeeJuly 29-210-Joe Lee
July 29-210-Joe Lee
 
Water Reuse Coalition
Water Reuse CoalitionWater Reuse Coalition
Water Reuse Coalition
 
Innovative Policies to Optimize the Allocation of Water Quality and Conservat...
Innovative Policies to Optimize the Allocation of Water Quality and Conservat...Innovative Policies to Optimize the Allocation of Water Quality and Conservat...
Innovative Policies to Optimize the Allocation of Water Quality and Conservat...
 
MN Clean Water Land & Legacy
MN Clean Water Land & LegacyMN Clean Water Land & Legacy
MN Clean Water Land & Legacy
 
Water south asia ppt reg parl meet islamabad 16 18 dec 2013
Water south asia ppt reg parl meet islamabad 16 18 dec 2013Water south asia ppt reg parl meet islamabad 16 18 dec 2013
Water south asia ppt reg parl meet islamabad 16 18 dec 2013
 
Watershed success stories phillips
Watershed success stories   phillipsWatershed success stories   phillips
Watershed success stories phillips
 
Factors Affecting Adoption of Nutrient Management Practices by Farmers and Ho...
Factors Affecting Adoption of Nutrient Management Practices by Farmers and Ho...Factors Affecting Adoption of Nutrient Management Practices by Farmers and Ho...
Factors Affecting Adoption of Nutrient Management Practices by Farmers and Ho...
 
Kings Basin Report
Kings Basin ReportKings Basin Report
Kings Basin Report
 
Urban-AG Partnerships
Urban-AG PartnershipsUrban-AG Partnerships
Urban-AG Partnerships
 
Chapter 9 sustainibility of water resources
Chapter 9 sustainibility of water resourcesChapter 9 sustainibility of water resources
Chapter 9 sustainibility of water resources
 
NutrientStar
NutrientStarNutrientStar
NutrientStar
 
Adding water supply to rehab projects surface
Adding water supply to rehab projects   surfaceAdding water supply to rehab projects   surface
Adding water supply to rehab projects surface
 
1. Addressing Ireland's Water challenges, the National Response - Feargal O C...
1. Addressing Ireland's Water challenges, the National Response - Feargal O C...1. Addressing Ireland's Water challenges, the National Response - Feargal O C...
1. Addressing Ireland's Water challenges, the National Response - Feargal O C...
 

En vedette

Stormwater cost effectiveness 140604
Stormwater cost effectiveness 140604Stormwater cost effectiveness 140604
Stormwater cost effectiveness 140604Clean Water
 
Presentation marcellus publands_201406_forcindydunn2
Presentation marcellus publands_201406_forcindydunn2Presentation marcellus publands_201406_forcindydunn2
Presentation marcellus publands_201406_forcindydunn2Clean Water
 
CCW Conference: Protecting the Susquehanna River
CCW Conference: Protecting the Susquehanna RiverCCW Conference: Protecting the Susquehanna River
CCW Conference: Protecting the Susquehanna RiverClean Water
 
CCW conf: Economic impact of_smallmouth_fishing_on_the_susquehanna [autosaved]
CCW conf: Economic impact of_smallmouth_fishing_on_the_susquehanna [autosaved]CCW conf: Economic impact of_smallmouth_fishing_on_the_susquehanna [autosaved]
CCW conf: Economic impact of_smallmouth_fishing_on_the_susquehanna [autosaved]Clean Water
 
P lde fur ccwc 6-2014
P lde fur ccwc 6-2014P lde fur ccwc 6-2014
P lde fur ccwc 6-2014Clean Water
 
Teaching Students with Emojis, Emoticons, & Textspeak
Teaching Students with Emojis, Emoticons, & TextspeakTeaching Students with Emojis, Emoticons, & Textspeak
Teaching Students with Emojis, Emoticons, & TextspeakShelly Sanchez Terrell
 
Hype vs. Reality: The AI Explainer
Hype vs. Reality: The AI ExplainerHype vs. Reality: The AI Explainer
Hype vs. Reality: The AI ExplainerLuminary Labs
 
Study: The Future of VR, AR and Self-Driving Cars
Study: The Future of VR, AR and Self-Driving CarsStudy: The Future of VR, AR and Self-Driving Cars
Study: The Future of VR, AR and Self-Driving CarsLinkedIn
 

En vedette (10)

Stormwater cost effectiveness 140604
Stormwater cost effectiveness 140604Stormwater cost effectiveness 140604
Stormwater cost effectiveness 140604
 
Presentation marcellus publands_201406_forcindydunn2
Presentation marcellus publands_201406_forcindydunn2Presentation marcellus publands_201406_forcindydunn2
Presentation marcellus publands_201406_forcindydunn2
 
Middleton
MiddletonMiddleton
Middleton
 
CCW Conference: Protecting the Susquehanna River
CCW Conference: Protecting the Susquehanna RiverCCW Conference: Protecting the Susquehanna River
CCW Conference: Protecting the Susquehanna River
 
CCW conf: Economic impact of_smallmouth_fishing_on_the_susquehanna [autosaved]
CCW conf: Economic impact of_smallmouth_fishing_on_the_susquehanna [autosaved]CCW conf: Economic impact of_smallmouth_fishing_on_the_susquehanna [autosaved]
CCW conf: Economic impact of_smallmouth_fishing_on_the_susquehanna [autosaved]
 
P lde fur ccwc 6-2014
P lde fur ccwc 6-2014P lde fur ccwc 6-2014
P lde fur ccwc 6-2014
 
Freeman
FreemanFreeman
Freeman
 
Teaching Students with Emojis, Emoticons, & Textspeak
Teaching Students with Emojis, Emoticons, & TextspeakTeaching Students with Emojis, Emoticons, & Textspeak
Teaching Students with Emojis, Emoticons, & Textspeak
 
Hype vs. Reality: The AI Explainer
Hype vs. Reality: The AI ExplainerHype vs. Reality: The AI Explainer
Hype vs. Reality: The AI Explainer
 
Study: The Future of VR, AR and Self-Driving Cars
Study: The Future of VR, AR and Self-Driving CarsStudy: The Future of VR, AR and Self-Driving Cars
Study: The Future of VR, AR and Self-Driving Cars
 

Similaire à Dc milestone

NY: A Green Infrastructure Approach - Onondaga Creek Water Quality
NY: A Green Infrastructure Approach - Onondaga Creek Water QualityNY: A Green Infrastructure Approach - Onondaga Creek Water Quality
NY: A Green Infrastructure Approach - Onondaga Creek Water QualitySotirakou964
 
Deep watershed management overview
Deep  watershed management   overviewDeep  watershed management   overview
Deep watershed management overviewRajesh Davulluri
 
Euclid integrated planning opportunity rev12
Euclid integrated planning opportunity rev12Euclid integrated planning opportunity rev12
Euclid integrated planning opportunity rev12Kelly Quinn Sands
 
Rabbit Branch at Collingham Drive Stream Restoration Information Meeting - Ju...
Rabbit Branch at Collingham Drive Stream Restoration Information Meeting - Ju...Rabbit Branch at Collingham Drive Stream Restoration Information Meeting - Ju...
Rabbit Branch at Collingham Drive Stream Restoration Information Meeting - Ju...Fairfax County
 
9/9 FRI 11:00 | Water Woes, Cash Flow Woes & Future Growth
9/9 FRI 11:00 | Water Woes, Cash Flow Woes & Future Growth9/9 FRI 11:00 | Water Woes, Cash Flow Woes & Future Growth
9/9 FRI 11:00 | Water Woes, Cash Flow Woes & Future GrowthAPA Florida
 
pLAn First Annual Report
pLAn First Annual ReportpLAn First Annual Report
pLAn First Annual ReportAlec Lautanen
 
Port lavaca desalination study
Port lavaca desalination studyPort lavaca desalination study
Port lavaca desalination studyJeffrey Pickett
 
The Rise of Blue-Green Infrastructure
The Rise of Blue-Green InfrastructureThe Rise of Blue-Green Infrastructure
The Rise of Blue-Green InfrastructureRobert Brears
 
ASSESSMENT OF FLOOD MITIGATION STRATEGIES FOR THE CITY OF KALONA, IA
ASSESSMENT OF FLOOD MITIGATION STRATEGIES FOR THE CITY OF KALONA, IAASSESSMENT OF FLOOD MITIGATION STRATEGIES FOR THE CITY OF KALONA, IA
ASSESSMENT OF FLOOD MITIGATION STRATEGIES FOR THE CITY OF KALONA, IADavid Koser
 
Showcasing Successful Green Stormwater Infrastructure - Lessons from Implemen...
Showcasing Successful Green Stormwater Infrastructure - Lessons from Implemen...Showcasing Successful Green Stormwater Infrastructure - Lessons from Implemen...
Showcasing Successful Green Stormwater Infrastructure - Lessons from Implemen...Amy Greenwood
 
GreenStormwaterInfrastructure_CaseStudyReport_LR
GreenStormwaterInfrastructure_CaseStudyReport_LRGreenStormwaterInfrastructure_CaseStudyReport_LR
GreenStormwaterInfrastructure_CaseStudyReport_LRAmy Greenwood
 
Writing Sample - Draft EIR
Writing Sample - Draft EIRWriting Sample - Draft EIR
Writing Sample - Draft EIRSharanya Ganesh
 
2013.dec.1314 318 e-green alleys grant program
2013.dec.1314 318 e-green alleys grant program2013.dec.1314 318 e-green alleys grant program
2013.dec.1314 318 e-green alleys grant programBerwyn Residents
 
River Smart Homes Presentation
River Smart Homes PresentationRiver Smart Homes Presentation
River Smart Homes PresentationBobette1031
 
ESDA_Workshop_Mishra1.pdf
ESDA_Workshop_Mishra1.pdfESDA_Workshop_Mishra1.pdf
ESDA_Workshop_Mishra1.pdfbinayamishra4
 
Water Conservation by the Yard: Estimating Savings from Outdoor Watering Rest...
Water Conservation by the Yard: Estimating Savings from Outdoor Watering Rest...Water Conservation by the Yard: Estimating Savings from Outdoor Watering Rest...
Water Conservation by the Yard: Estimating Savings from Outdoor Watering Rest...Texas Living Waters Project
 
Collaboration, Science, and Technology Merge to Improve Water Quality
Collaboration, Science, and Technology Merge to Improve Water QualityCollaboration, Science, and Technology Merge to Improve Water Quality
Collaboration, Science, and Technology Merge to Improve Water QualityArbor Day Foundation
 
Urban watershed management
Urban watershed managementUrban watershed management
Urban watershed managementpreetijaycobe
 

Similaire à Dc milestone (20)

NY: A Green Infrastructure Approach - Onondaga Creek Water Quality
NY: A Green Infrastructure Approach - Onondaga Creek Water QualityNY: A Green Infrastructure Approach - Onondaga Creek Water Quality
NY: A Green Infrastructure Approach - Onondaga Creek Water Quality
 
Deep watershed management overview
Deep  watershed management   overviewDeep  watershed management   overview
Deep watershed management overview
 
Euclid integrated planning opportunity rev12
Euclid integrated planning opportunity rev12Euclid integrated planning opportunity rev12
Euclid integrated planning opportunity rev12
 
Rabbit Branch at Collingham Drive Stream Restoration Information Meeting - Ju...
Rabbit Branch at Collingham Drive Stream Restoration Information Meeting - Ju...Rabbit Branch at Collingham Drive Stream Restoration Information Meeting - Ju...
Rabbit Branch at Collingham Drive Stream Restoration Information Meeting - Ju...
 
9/9 FRI 11:00 | Water Woes, Cash Flow Woes & Future Growth
9/9 FRI 11:00 | Water Woes, Cash Flow Woes & Future Growth9/9 FRI 11:00 | Water Woes, Cash Flow Woes & Future Growth
9/9 FRI 11:00 | Water Woes, Cash Flow Woes & Future Growth
 
pLAn First Annual Report
pLAn First Annual ReportpLAn First Annual Report
pLAn First Annual Report
 
Port lavaca desalination study
Port lavaca desalination studyPort lavaca desalination study
Port lavaca desalination study
 
Bunting howart
Bunting howartBunting howart
Bunting howart
 
The Rise of Blue-Green Infrastructure
The Rise of Blue-Green InfrastructureThe Rise of Blue-Green Infrastructure
The Rise of Blue-Green Infrastructure
 
ASSESSMENT OF FLOOD MITIGATION STRATEGIES FOR THE CITY OF KALONA, IA
ASSESSMENT OF FLOOD MITIGATION STRATEGIES FOR THE CITY OF KALONA, IAASSESSMENT OF FLOOD MITIGATION STRATEGIES FOR THE CITY OF KALONA, IA
ASSESSMENT OF FLOOD MITIGATION STRATEGIES FOR THE CITY OF KALONA, IA
 
Showcasing Successful Green Stormwater Infrastructure - Lessons from Implemen...
Showcasing Successful Green Stormwater Infrastructure - Lessons from Implemen...Showcasing Successful Green Stormwater Infrastructure - Lessons from Implemen...
Showcasing Successful Green Stormwater Infrastructure - Lessons from Implemen...
 
GreenStormwaterInfrastructure_CaseStudyReport_LR
GreenStormwaterInfrastructure_CaseStudyReport_LRGreenStormwaterInfrastructure_CaseStudyReport_LR
GreenStormwaterInfrastructure_CaseStudyReport_LR
 
Writing Sample - Draft EIR
Writing Sample - Draft EIRWriting Sample - Draft EIR
Writing Sample - Draft EIR
 
2013.dec.1314 318 e-green alleys grant program
2013.dec.1314 318 e-green alleys grant program2013.dec.1314 318 e-green alleys grant program
2013.dec.1314 318 e-green alleys grant program
 
River Smart Homes Presentation
River Smart Homes PresentationRiver Smart Homes Presentation
River Smart Homes Presentation
 
ESDA_Workshop_Mishra1.pdf
ESDA_Workshop_Mishra1.pdfESDA_Workshop_Mishra1.pdf
ESDA_Workshop_Mishra1.pdf
 
Water Conservation by the Yard: Estimating Savings from Outdoor Watering Rest...
Water Conservation by the Yard: Estimating Savings from Outdoor Watering Rest...Water Conservation by the Yard: Estimating Savings from Outdoor Watering Rest...
Water Conservation by the Yard: Estimating Savings from Outdoor Watering Rest...
 
Collaboration, Science, and Technology Merge to Improve Water Quality
Collaboration, Science, and Technology Merge to Improve Water QualityCollaboration, Science, and Technology Merge to Improve Water Quality
Collaboration, Science, and Technology Merge to Improve Water Quality
 
Urban watershed management
Urban watershed managementUrban watershed management
Urban watershed management
 
Elements_2014_Vol2
Elements_2014_Vol2Elements_2014_Vol2
Elements_2014_Vol2
 

Plus de Clean Water

Kristen grimm nwf_baltimore_-_ppt_spitfire_template
Kristen grimm nwf_baltimore_-_ppt_spitfire_templateKristen grimm nwf_baltimore_-_ppt_spitfire_template
Kristen grimm nwf_baltimore_-_ppt_spitfire_templateClean Water
 
Edelson june3choosecleanwater
Edelson june3choosecleanwaterEdelson june3choosecleanwater
Edelson june3choosecleanwaterClean Water
 
Conewago creek initiative farmer outreach
Conewago creek initiative farmer outreachConewago creek initiative farmer outreach
Conewago creek initiative farmer outreachClean Water
 
Clean water talk draft2
Clean water talk draft2Clean water talk draft2
Clean water talk draft2Clean Water
 
Clean water conference (avoid crisis tone)
Clean water conference (avoid crisis tone)Clean water conference (avoid crisis tone)
Clean water conference (avoid crisis tone)Clean Water
 
Clarke co clean_water
Clarke co clean_waterClarke co clean_water
Clarke co clean_waterClean Water
 
Choose clean water 060414
Choose clean water 060414Choose clean water 060414
Choose clean water 060414Clean Water
 
Choose clean water coalition
Choose clean water coalitionChoose clean water coalition
Choose clean water coalitionClean Water
 
Ccw presentation nations
Ccw presentation  nationsCcw presentation  nations
Ccw presentation nationsClean Water
 
45 minute powerpoint
45 minute powerpoint45 minute powerpoint
45 minute powerpointClean Water
 
Tues 9 whitescarver_choose clean water conf
Tues 9 whitescarver_choose clean water confTues 9 whitescarver_choose clean water conf
Tues 9 whitescarver_choose clean water confClean Water
 
Thg ccw presentation final
Thg ccw presentation   finalThg ccw presentation   final
Thg ccw presentation finalClean Water
 
Stoner 915 am tuesday
Stoner 915 am tuesdayStoner 915 am tuesday
Stoner 915 am tuesdayClean Water
 
Sorrels 945 am tuesday ccw
Sorrels 945 am tuesday ccwSorrels 945 am tuesday ccw
Sorrels 945 am tuesday ccwClean Water
 
Listening to farmers
Listening to farmersListening to farmers
Listening to farmersClean Water
 
Clean water conference
Clean water conferenceClean water conference
Clean water conferenceClean Water
 
Chris miller crisis is in the eye of the beholder -- cgm-- june 2014
Chris miller crisis is in the eye of the beholder -- cgm-- june 2014Chris miller crisis is in the eye of the beholder -- cgm-- june 2014
Chris miller crisis is in the eye of the beholder -- cgm-- june 2014Clean Water
 

Plus de Clean Water (20)

Kristen grimm nwf_baltimore_-_ppt_spitfire_template
Kristen grimm nwf_baltimore_-_ppt_spitfire_templateKristen grimm nwf_baltimore_-_ppt_spitfire_template
Kristen grimm nwf_baltimore_-_ppt_spitfire_template
 
Gw for ccwc
Gw for ccwcGw for ccwc
Gw for ccwc
 
Edelson june3choosecleanwater
Edelson june3choosecleanwaterEdelson june3choosecleanwater
Edelson june3choosecleanwater
 
Conewago creek initiative farmer outreach
Conewago creek initiative farmer outreachConewago creek initiative farmer outreach
Conewago creek initiative farmer outreach
 
Clean water talk draft2
Clean water talk draft2Clean water talk draft2
Clean water talk draft2
 
Clean water conference (avoid crisis tone)
Clean water conference (avoid crisis tone)Clean water conference (avoid crisis tone)
Clean water conference (avoid crisis tone)
 
Clarke co clean_water
Clarke co clean_waterClarke co clean_water
Clarke co clean_water
 
Choose clean water 060414
Choose clean water 060414Choose clean water 060414
Choose clean water 060414
 
Choose clean water coalition
Choose clean water coalitionChoose clean water coalition
Choose clean water coalition
 
Ccwslr
Ccwslr Ccwslr
Ccwslr
 
Ccw presentation nations
Ccw presentation  nationsCcw presentation  nations
Ccw presentation nations
 
45 minute powerpoint
45 minute powerpoint45 minute powerpoint
45 minute powerpoint
 
Tues 9 whitescarver_choose clean water conf
Tues 9 whitescarver_choose clean water confTues 9 whitescarver_choose clean water conf
Tues 9 whitescarver_choose clean water conf
 
Thg ccw presentation final
Thg ccw presentation   finalThg ccw presentation   final
Thg ccw presentation final
 
Stoner 915 am tuesday
Stoner 915 am tuesdayStoner 915 am tuesday
Stoner 915 am tuesday
 
Sorrels 945 am tuesday ccw
Sorrels 945 am tuesday ccwSorrels 945 am tuesday ccw
Sorrels 945 am tuesday ccw
 
Listening to farmers
Listening to farmersListening to farmers
Listening to farmers
 
Clean water conference
Clean water conferenceClean water conference
Clean water conference
 
Chris miller crisis is in the eye of the beholder -- cgm-- june 2014
Chris miller crisis is in the eye of the beholder -- cgm-- june 2014Chris miller crisis is in the eye of the beholder -- cgm-- june 2014
Chris miller crisis is in the eye of the beholder -- cgm-- june 2014
 
Ccwc cameron
Ccwc cameronCcwc cameron
Ccwc cameron
 

Dernier

Beyond Boundaries: Leveraging No-Code Solutions for Industry Innovation
Beyond Boundaries: Leveraging No-Code Solutions for Industry InnovationBeyond Boundaries: Leveraging No-Code Solutions for Industry Innovation
Beyond Boundaries: Leveraging No-Code Solutions for Industry InnovationSafe Software
 
A Domino Admins Adventures (Engage 2024)
A Domino Admins Adventures (Engage 2024)A Domino Admins Adventures (Engage 2024)
A Domino Admins Adventures (Engage 2024)Gabriella Davis
 
GenCyber Cyber Security Day Presentation
GenCyber Cyber Security Day PresentationGenCyber Cyber Security Day Presentation
GenCyber Cyber Security Day PresentationMichael W. Hawkins
 
08448380779 Call Girls In Diplomatic Enclave Women Seeking Men
08448380779 Call Girls In Diplomatic Enclave Women Seeking Men08448380779 Call Girls In Diplomatic Enclave Women Seeking Men
08448380779 Call Girls In Diplomatic Enclave Women Seeking MenDelhi Call girls
 
Human Factors of XR: Using Human Factors to Design XR Systems
Human Factors of XR: Using Human Factors to Design XR SystemsHuman Factors of XR: Using Human Factors to Design XR Systems
Human Factors of XR: Using Human Factors to Design XR SystemsMark Billinghurst
 
08448380779 Call Girls In Greater Kailash - I Women Seeking Men
08448380779 Call Girls In Greater Kailash - I Women Seeking Men08448380779 Call Girls In Greater Kailash - I Women Seeking Men
08448380779 Call Girls In Greater Kailash - I Women Seeking MenDelhi Call girls
 
FULL ENJOY 🔝 8264348440 🔝 Call Girls in Diplomatic Enclave | Delhi
FULL ENJOY 🔝 8264348440 🔝 Call Girls in Diplomatic Enclave | DelhiFULL ENJOY 🔝 8264348440 🔝 Call Girls in Diplomatic Enclave | Delhi
FULL ENJOY 🔝 8264348440 🔝 Call Girls in Diplomatic Enclave | Delhisoniya singh
 
Benefits Of Flutter Compared To Other Frameworks
Benefits Of Flutter Compared To Other FrameworksBenefits Of Flutter Compared To Other Frameworks
Benefits Of Flutter Compared To Other FrameworksSoftradix Technologies
 
How to Remove Document Management Hurdles with X-Docs?
How to Remove Document Management Hurdles with X-Docs?How to Remove Document Management Hurdles with X-Docs?
How to Remove Document Management Hurdles with X-Docs?XfilesPro
 
08448380779 Call Girls In Civil Lines Women Seeking Men
08448380779 Call Girls In Civil Lines Women Seeking Men08448380779 Call Girls In Civil Lines Women Seeking Men
08448380779 Call Girls In Civil Lines Women Seeking MenDelhi Call girls
 
Swan(sea) Song – personal research during my six years at Swansea ... and bey...
Swan(sea) Song – personal research during my six years at Swansea ... and bey...Swan(sea) Song – personal research during my six years at Swansea ... and bey...
Swan(sea) Song – personal research during my six years at Swansea ... and bey...Alan Dix
 
Key Features Of Token Development (1).pptx
Key  Features Of Token  Development (1).pptxKey  Features Of Token  Development (1).pptx
Key Features Of Token Development (1).pptxLBM Solutions
 
Presentation on how to chat with PDF using ChatGPT code interpreter
Presentation on how to chat with PDF using ChatGPT code interpreterPresentation on how to chat with PDF using ChatGPT code interpreter
Presentation on how to chat with PDF using ChatGPT code interpreternaman860154
 
How to convert PDF to text with Nanonets
How to convert PDF to text with NanonetsHow to convert PDF to text with Nanonets
How to convert PDF to text with Nanonetsnaman860154
 
Slack Application Development 101 Slides
Slack Application Development 101 SlidesSlack Application Development 101 Slides
Slack Application Development 101 Slidespraypatel2
 
Scaling API-first – The story of a global engineering organization
Scaling API-first – The story of a global engineering organizationScaling API-first – The story of a global engineering organization
Scaling API-first – The story of a global engineering organizationRadu Cotescu
 
Integration and Automation in Practice: CI/CD in Mule Integration and Automat...
Integration and Automation in Practice: CI/CD in Mule Integration and Automat...Integration and Automation in Practice: CI/CD in Mule Integration and Automat...
Integration and Automation in Practice: CI/CD in Mule Integration and Automat...Patryk Bandurski
 
Transforming Data Streams with Kafka Connect: An Introduction to Single Messa...
Transforming Data Streams with Kafka Connect: An Introduction to Single Messa...Transforming Data Streams with Kafka Connect: An Introduction to Single Messa...
Transforming Data Streams with Kafka Connect: An Introduction to Single Messa...HostedbyConfluent
 
WhatsApp 9892124323 ✓Call Girls In Kalyan ( Mumbai ) secure service
WhatsApp 9892124323 ✓Call Girls In Kalyan ( Mumbai ) secure serviceWhatsApp 9892124323 ✓Call Girls In Kalyan ( Mumbai ) secure service
WhatsApp 9892124323 ✓Call Girls In Kalyan ( Mumbai ) secure servicePooja Nehwal
 
Tech-Forward - Achieving Business Readiness For Copilot in Microsoft 365
Tech-Forward - Achieving Business Readiness For Copilot in Microsoft 365Tech-Forward - Achieving Business Readiness For Copilot in Microsoft 365
Tech-Forward - Achieving Business Readiness For Copilot in Microsoft 3652toLead Limited
 

Dernier (20)

Beyond Boundaries: Leveraging No-Code Solutions for Industry Innovation
Beyond Boundaries: Leveraging No-Code Solutions for Industry InnovationBeyond Boundaries: Leveraging No-Code Solutions for Industry Innovation
Beyond Boundaries: Leveraging No-Code Solutions for Industry Innovation
 
A Domino Admins Adventures (Engage 2024)
A Domino Admins Adventures (Engage 2024)A Domino Admins Adventures (Engage 2024)
A Domino Admins Adventures (Engage 2024)
 
GenCyber Cyber Security Day Presentation
GenCyber Cyber Security Day PresentationGenCyber Cyber Security Day Presentation
GenCyber Cyber Security Day Presentation
 
08448380779 Call Girls In Diplomatic Enclave Women Seeking Men
08448380779 Call Girls In Diplomatic Enclave Women Seeking Men08448380779 Call Girls In Diplomatic Enclave Women Seeking Men
08448380779 Call Girls In Diplomatic Enclave Women Seeking Men
 
Human Factors of XR: Using Human Factors to Design XR Systems
Human Factors of XR: Using Human Factors to Design XR SystemsHuman Factors of XR: Using Human Factors to Design XR Systems
Human Factors of XR: Using Human Factors to Design XR Systems
 
08448380779 Call Girls In Greater Kailash - I Women Seeking Men
08448380779 Call Girls In Greater Kailash - I Women Seeking Men08448380779 Call Girls In Greater Kailash - I Women Seeking Men
08448380779 Call Girls In Greater Kailash - I Women Seeking Men
 
FULL ENJOY 🔝 8264348440 🔝 Call Girls in Diplomatic Enclave | Delhi
FULL ENJOY 🔝 8264348440 🔝 Call Girls in Diplomatic Enclave | DelhiFULL ENJOY 🔝 8264348440 🔝 Call Girls in Diplomatic Enclave | Delhi
FULL ENJOY 🔝 8264348440 🔝 Call Girls in Diplomatic Enclave | Delhi
 
Benefits Of Flutter Compared To Other Frameworks
Benefits Of Flutter Compared To Other FrameworksBenefits Of Flutter Compared To Other Frameworks
Benefits Of Flutter Compared To Other Frameworks
 
How to Remove Document Management Hurdles with X-Docs?
How to Remove Document Management Hurdles with X-Docs?How to Remove Document Management Hurdles with X-Docs?
How to Remove Document Management Hurdles with X-Docs?
 
08448380779 Call Girls In Civil Lines Women Seeking Men
08448380779 Call Girls In Civil Lines Women Seeking Men08448380779 Call Girls In Civil Lines Women Seeking Men
08448380779 Call Girls In Civil Lines Women Seeking Men
 
Swan(sea) Song – personal research during my six years at Swansea ... and bey...
Swan(sea) Song – personal research during my six years at Swansea ... and bey...Swan(sea) Song – personal research during my six years at Swansea ... and bey...
Swan(sea) Song – personal research during my six years at Swansea ... and bey...
 
Key Features Of Token Development (1).pptx
Key  Features Of Token  Development (1).pptxKey  Features Of Token  Development (1).pptx
Key Features Of Token Development (1).pptx
 
Presentation on how to chat with PDF using ChatGPT code interpreter
Presentation on how to chat with PDF using ChatGPT code interpreterPresentation on how to chat with PDF using ChatGPT code interpreter
Presentation on how to chat with PDF using ChatGPT code interpreter
 
How to convert PDF to text with Nanonets
How to convert PDF to text with NanonetsHow to convert PDF to text with Nanonets
How to convert PDF to text with Nanonets
 
Slack Application Development 101 Slides
Slack Application Development 101 SlidesSlack Application Development 101 Slides
Slack Application Development 101 Slides
 
Scaling API-first – The story of a global engineering organization
Scaling API-first – The story of a global engineering organizationScaling API-first – The story of a global engineering organization
Scaling API-first – The story of a global engineering organization
 
Integration and Automation in Practice: CI/CD in Mule Integration and Automat...
Integration and Automation in Practice: CI/CD in Mule Integration and Automat...Integration and Automation in Practice: CI/CD in Mule Integration and Automat...
Integration and Automation in Practice: CI/CD in Mule Integration and Automat...
 
Transforming Data Streams with Kafka Connect: An Introduction to Single Messa...
Transforming Data Streams with Kafka Connect: An Introduction to Single Messa...Transforming Data Streams with Kafka Connect: An Introduction to Single Messa...
Transforming Data Streams with Kafka Connect: An Introduction to Single Messa...
 
WhatsApp 9892124323 ✓Call Girls In Kalyan ( Mumbai ) secure service
WhatsApp 9892124323 ✓Call Girls In Kalyan ( Mumbai ) secure serviceWhatsApp 9892124323 ✓Call Girls In Kalyan ( Mumbai ) secure service
WhatsApp 9892124323 ✓Call Girls In Kalyan ( Mumbai ) secure service
 
Tech-Forward - Achieving Business Readiness For Copilot in Microsoft 365
Tech-Forward - Achieving Business Readiness For Copilot in Microsoft 365Tech-Forward - Achieving Business Readiness For Copilot in Microsoft 365
Tech-Forward - Achieving Business Readiness For Copilot in Microsoft 365
 

Dc milestone

  • 1. Washington D.C.’s Plan for Clean Water: Is the District On Track? Residents in the region are starting to see the benefits of investments and improvements made in local waterways and the Chesapeake Bay. The practices that protect and restore our waterways— tree plantings, polluted runoff infiltration practices, urban stream restoration, and upgrades to waste- water treatment plants—ultimately improve our quality of life by reducing flooding, securing healthier drinking water, beautifying our neighborhoods, and ensuring safer waters for recreation. Unfortu- nately, despite making progress, the Chesapeake Bay watershed still remains a system dangerously out of balance. Too much nitrogen, phosphorus, and sediment pollution continues to run off our lawns and city streets, and into local streams, the Potomac River, and the Bay. In 2010, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Bay jurisdictions established science- based limits for these pollutants and state-specific plans to achieve them, together known as the Chesapeake Clean Water Blueprint. EPA, the states, and Washington, D.C., also committed to implement actions to achieve 60 percent of the needed reductions by 2017 and 100 percent by 2025. To ensure these clean-water efforts stay on track, each of the states and Washington, D.C., committed to two-year goals or milestones detailing the programs and practices intended to be met in the near-term to achieve the 2017 and 2025 long-term goals. The milestones are a critical accountability tool, providing the opportunity to measure progress in the context of long-term Bay restoration efforts. Because of the impor- tance of the milestones, the Chesapeake Bay Foundation and the Choose Clean Water Coalition are collab- orating to evaluate and publicize pollution-reduction progress. This report evaluates, for select practices, whether Washington, D.C., achieved its 2012/2013 two-year milestone goals and whether or not this progress is on a trajectory to achieve 60 percent implementation by 2015 and full implementation by 2025. Conclusion Washington, D.C., has exceeded 2013 goals for four out of the six practices selected for evaluation. Wash- ington, D.C., compensated for its two unachieved milestones by exceeding goals in other, more efficient, practices like infiltration practices and impervious surface reduction. We commend D.C. leaders and the District Department of the Environment (DDOE) for achieving their clean-up reductions early and setting more stringent expectations under the Sustainable D.C. Plan. However, we urge Washington, D.C., to recognize the value of setting bi-annual milestones that reflect its implementation plans so that reported data accurately represents D.C.’s commitment to pollution reduc- tions. The District will need to account for substantial commitments remaining in impervious surface re- ductions, tree planting, and urban stream restoration. As such, DDOE has developed ambitious milestone goals for 2015 that will encourage significant progress toward D.C.’s 2025 goals. In addition, the District must redouble efforts to reduce nitrogen pollution. Recent efforts like the 2012 passage of fertilizer regulations, a commitment to fifteen-million-square feet of urban polluted runoff retrofits per year, and increased incentives for landowners to manage runoff, will reduce nitrogen pollution. We commend DDOE for adopting the new polluted runoff rule and wetlands regulations in 2013, imple- menting a new credit trading policy, and consolidating polluted runoff permit implementation plans. Washington, D.C., has established itself as a regional and national leader through its commitment to pollution reduction. We call on the mayor-elect for a formal commitment to clean-water plans within established deadlines. June 2014 AT A GLANCE Urban/Suburban Urban Tree Planting Stormwater Infiltration Practices Stormwater Ponds Street Sweeping Impervious Surface Reduction Urban Stream Restoration See the charts on the inside of this sheet for more information. For more detailed information on all of Washington, D.C.’s milestone goals, go to: www.epa.gov/reg3wapd/ tmdl/Chesapeake Bay/Ensur- ingResults.html. 2012/2013 FINAL ASSESSMENT Washington, D.C. Milestones 6 Herndon Avenue | Annapolis, Maryland 21403 888/SAVEBAY | cbf.org How this Report was Compiled We selected a subset of implemented practices within two pollution source categories—urban/suburban sources and waste- water treatment—based on their potential to provide substantial nitrogen, phosphorus, and sediment pollution reductions and offer important lessons for implementation moving forward. For each practice, progress (% achievement) was evaluated by looking at incremental progress between the base year, 2011, and 2013, compared to the 2013 milestone goal. Progress during this mile- stone period was also compared to the long-term (2017 and 2025) implementation benchmarks that the states and Washing- ton, D.C., committed to in their Watershed Implementation Plans. Data were provided by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s Chesapeake Bay Program Office. 706 Giddings Avenue 1-B | Annapolis, Maryland 21401 443/759-3400 | choosecleanwater.org Pollution Reduction in Washington, D.C., at a Glance Washington, D.C., has seen net reductions in nitrogen, phos- phorus, and sediment pollution. However, nitrogen and sedi- ment load reductions from the urban sector are not on track to meet the long-term goals. This should be of greatest concern to Washington, D.C., leaders as the population grows and cre- ates pressures that exacerbate polluted runoff. Success Story Canal Park is a new public community natural space in the heart of the recently revitalized Capital Riverfront area of southeast Wash- ington, D.C.The award-winning park’s design incorporates advanced sustainability features for polluted-runoff management and water use. Canal Park is an example of what diverse public and private partnerships can accomplish in the name of cleaner waterways and community revival.Today,Washington, D.C., residents can enjoy this public natural space while its aesthetic environmental site design improves the natural environment. This historic park was first conceptualized in the late 1990s when The W.C. Smith Company purchased and invested in land along the Washington Canal that largely consisted of vacant lots and aban- doned warehouses.Today, this once-desolate area is a redeveloped, river-friendly community, bringing economic prosperity back to the southeast region of the city. 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 2025201720132011 2025 GOAL POLLUTED RUNOFF WASTEWATER 2017 GOAL Modeled Nitrogen Loads and Long Term Goals in Washington, D.C., by Sector (thousands of pounds) Source: Chesapeake Bay Program Watershed Model 5.3.2 0 20 40 60 80 120 2025201720132011 POLLUTED RUNOFF 100 2025 GOAL WASTEWATER 2017 GOAL Modeled Phosphorus Loads and Long Term Goals in Washington, D.C., by Sector (thousands of pounds) Washington, D.C., has already exceeded its 2025 nitrogen-reduction goals by 220 percent. However, D.C. has only secured 4 percent of its 2017 nitrogen- reduction goal from urban runoff. Though D.C. has met its 2025 nitrogen reductions through wastewater treatment,it must accelerate efforts to address the greater challenge of polluted runoff. As of 2013, Washington, D.C.’s, total phosphorus load is decreasing, but it has only achieved 33 percent of its 2025 goal for phosphorus reductions from pol- luted runoff.We encourageWashington,D.C.,to commit to achieving these phos- phorus reductions for polluted runoff despite exceeding total reduction goals. *Pollution reduction is ahead of schedule for this sector. * *
  • 2. Assessment of D.C.’s Progress on Selected Pollution-Reduction Practices for 2013 Urban Stream Restoration feet This milestone was exceeded, though D.C. saw no increase in stream restoration between 2012 and 2013 due to permitting obstacles.DDOE will restore roughly 28,000 additional square feet by 2016.D.C.has made honorable commitments to restoring and planting an additional 50 percent of wetlands that will provide resiliency in riverside and streamside communities. 0 10,000 30,000 50,000 2011 2015 2019 2021 2023 40,000 2013 2017 G 2025 G 20,000 Progress Relative to Long-Term Goals (feet) Urban/Suburban Polluted Runoff Impervious Surface (e.g. roads, roofs, etc.) Reduction acres The Sustainable D.C.Plan calls for 75 percent of the District’s landscape to capture rainwater for filtration and reuse by 2032.We commend the District’s Department of the Environment for accelerating the pace in its 2014-2015 draft Milestones. This will address the significant commitments in D.C.’s Watershed Implementation Plan to reduce or retrofit impervious surfaces. This reduction will be instrumental toward mitigating growing urban runoff rates. 0 500 1,000 3,500 2011 2015 2019 2021 2023 1,500 2013 2017 2025 G 2,000 2,500 3,000 Progress Relative to Long-Term Goals (acres) 67 (2-YEAR INCREMENTAL PROGRESS) 50 (2-YEAR INCREMENTAL MILESTONE) = 134% Urban Tree Planting acres AlthoughWashington,D.C.,continues to exceed its milestone goals,a re- doubling of efforts is necessary to accomplish the Sustainable D.C.Plan goal of 8,600 new trees planted each year by 2032.To prepare for the projected influx of new residents and the additional pollution they will contribute, Washington,D.C.,strives to increase its urban tree canopy to 40 percent coverage. 0 300 900 1,500 2011 2015 2019 2021 2023 1,200 2013 2017 2025 600 Progress Relative to Long-Term Goals (acres) 201 (2-YEAR INCREMENTAL PROGRESS) 65 (2-YEAR INCREMENTAL MILESTONE) = 309% Stormwater (Polluted Runoff) Infiltration Practices* acres Washington, D.C., annually surpasses its milestone goals for traditional polluted runoff practices.Yet overall,nitrogen,phosphorus,and sediment pollution from urban runoff are not on track to meet 2017 and 2025 target reductions. Infiltration is an extremely effective practice and helps achive requirements of the polluted runoff permit and regulations. We believe these goals could be more agressive. 0 500 1,000 2,000 2011 2015 2019 2021 2023 1,500 2013 2017 2025 G Progress Relative to Long-Term Goals (acres) 316 (2-YEAR INCREMENTAL PROGRESS) 70 (2-YEAR INCREMENTAL MILESTONE) = 451% Stormwater (Polluted Runoff) Ponds** acres The District’s new polluted runoff rule, released in July of 2013, insti- tuted performance standards for superior retention on large develop- ment sites. This will lead to greater runoff reductions when the rule soon goes into effect.We call onWashington,D.C.,to avoid a third consecutive year of failing to meet milestone goals for stormwater ponds in 2015. 0 300 900 1,500 2011 2015 2019 2021 2023 1,200 2013 2017 2025 600 Progress Relative to Long-Term Goals (acres) 114 (2-YEAR INCREMENTAL PROGRES) 122 (2-YEAR INCREMENTAL MILESTONE) = 93% Street Sweeping acres According to the Chesapeake Bay Program (CBP) data, two percent fewer streets were treated in 2013 than in 2011, but the District De- partment of the Environment (DDOE) raised concerns that this was inaccurate.We commend the District for exceeding its 2025 deadline require- ment early in 2010, but we call on CBP and DDOE to work together to ensure consistency in reported data. 0 500 1,000 2,500 2011 2015 2019 2021 2023 1,500 2013 2017 2025 G 2,000 Progress Relative to Long-Term Goals (acres) -14 (2-YEAR INCREMENTAL PROGRESS) 828 (2-YEAR INCREMENTAL MILESTONE) = -2% **Wetponds & wetlands, dry ponds, extended dry ponds. *Infiltration practices, filtering practices, bioretention, and bioswale. 2,150 (2-YEAR INCREMENTAL PROGRESS) 566 (2-YEAR INCREMENTAL MILESTONE) = 380% P 2-YEAR INCREMENTAL PROGRESS M 2-YEAR INCREMENTAL MILESTONE P M P M P M P M P M P M P M P M P M P M P M P M MILESTONEPROGRESS MILESTONEPROGRESS MILESTONEPROGRESS MILESTONEPROGRESS MILESTONEPROGRESSMILESTONEPROGRESS
  • 3. Assessment of D.C.’s Progress on Selected Pollution-Reduction Practices for 2013 Urban Stream Restoration feet This milestone was exceeded, though D.C. saw no increase in stream restoration between 2012 and 2013 due to permitting obstacles.DDOE will restore roughly 28,000 additional square feet by 2016.D.C.has made honorable commitments to restoring and planting an additional 50 percent of wetlands that will provide resiliency in riverside and streamside communities. 0 10,000 30,000 50,000 2011 2015 2019 2021 2023 40,000 2013 2017 G 2025 G 20,000 Progress Relative to Long-Term Goals (feet) Urban/Suburban Polluted Runoff Impervious Surface (e.g. roads, roofs, etc.) Reduction acres The Sustainable D.C.Plan calls for 75 percent of the District’s landscape to capture rainwater for filtration and reuse by 2032.We commend the District’s Department of the Environment for accelerating the pace in its 2014-2015 draft Milestones. This will address the significant commitments in D.C.’s Watershed Implementation Plan to reduce or retrofit impervious surfaces. This reduction will be instrumental toward mitigating growing urban runoff rates. 0 500 1,000 3,500 2011 2015 2019 2021 2023 1,500 2013 2017 2025 G 2,000 2,500 3,000 Progress Relative to Long-Term Goals (acres) 67 (2-YEAR INCREMENTAL PROGRESS) 50 (2-YEAR INCREMENTAL MILESTONE) = 134% Urban Tree Planting acres AlthoughWashington,D.C.,continues to exceed its milestone goals,a re- doubling of efforts is necessary to accomplish the Sustainable D.C.Plan goal of 8,600 new trees planted each year by 2032.To prepare for the projected influx of new residents and the additional pollution they will contribute, Washington,D.C.,strives to increase its urban tree canopy to 40 percent coverage. 0 300 900 1,500 2011 2015 2019 2021 2023 1,200 2013 2017 2025 600 Progress Relative to Long-Term Goals (acres) 201 (2-YEAR INCREMENTAL PROGRESS) 65 (2-YEAR INCREMENTAL MILESTONE) = 309% Stormwater (Polluted Runoff) Infiltration Practices* acres Washington, D.C., annually surpasses its milestone goals for traditional polluted runoff practices.Yet overall,nitrogen,phosphorus,and sediment pollution from urban runoff are not on track to meet 2017 and 2025 target reductions. Infiltration is an extremely effective practice and helps achive requirements of the polluted runoff permit and regulations. We believe these goals could be more agressive. 0 500 1,000 2,000 2011 2015 2019 2021 2023 1,500 2013 2017 2025 G Progress Relative to Long-Term Goals (acres) 316 (2-YEAR INCREMENTAL PROGRESS) 70 (2-YEAR INCREMENTAL MILESTONE) = 451% Stormwater (Polluted Runoff) Ponds** acres The District’s new polluted runoff rule, released in July of 2013, insti- tuted performance standards for superior retention on large develop- ment sites. This will lead to greater runoff reductions when the rule soon goes into effect.We call onWashington,D.C.,to avoid a third consecutive year of failing to meet milestone goals for stormwater ponds in 2015. 0 300 900 1,500 2011 2015 2019 2021 2023 1,200 2013 2017 2025 600 Progress Relative to Long-Term Goals (acres) 114 (2-YEAR INCREMENTAL PROGRES) 122 (2-YEAR INCREMENTAL MILESTONE) = 93% Street Sweeping acres According to the Chesapeake Bay Program (CBP) data, two percent fewer streets were treated in 2013 than in 2011, but the District De- partment of the Environment (DDOE) raised concerns that this was inaccurate.We commend the District for exceeding its 2025 deadline require- ment early in 2010, but we call on CBP and DDOE to work together to ensure consistency in reported data. 0 500 1,000 2,500 2011 2015 2019 2021 2023 1,500 2013 2017 2025 G 2,000 Progress Relative to Long-Term Goals (acres) -14 (2-YEAR INCREMENTAL PROGRESS) 828 (2-YEAR INCREMENTAL MILESTONE) = -2% **Wetponds & wetlands, dry ponds, extended dry ponds. *Infiltration practices, filtering practices, bioretention, and bioswale. 2,150 (2-YEAR INCREMENTAL PROGRESS) 566 (2-YEAR INCREMENTAL MILESTONE) = 380% P 2-YEAR INCREMENTAL PROGRESS M 2-YEAR INCREMENTAL MILESTONE P M P M P M P M P M P M P M P M P M P M P M P M MILESTONEPROGRESS MILESTONEPROGRESS MILESTONEPROGRESS MILESTONEPROGRESS MILESTONEPROGRESSMILESTONEPROGRESS
  • 4. Washington D.C.’s Plan for Clean Water: Is the District On Track? Residents in the region are starting to see the benefits of investments and improvements made in local waterways and the Chesapeake Bay. The practices that protect and restore our waterways— tree plantings, polluted runoff infiltration practices, urban stream restoration, and upgrades to waste- water treatment plants—ultimately improve our quality of life by reducing flooding, securing healthier drinking water, beautifying our neighborhoods, and ensuring safer waters for recreation. Unfortu- nately, despite making progress, the Chesapeake Bay watershed still remains a system dangerously out of balance. Too much nitrogen, phosphorus, and sediment pollution continues to run off our lawns and city streets, and into local streams, the Potomac River, and the Bay. In 2010, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Bay jurisdictions established science- based limits for these pollutants and state-specific plans to achieve them, together known as the Chesapeake Clean Water Blueprint. EPA, the states, and Washington, D.C., also committed to implement actions to achieve 60 percent of the needed reductions by 2017 and 100 percent by 2025. To ensure these clean-water efforts stay on track, each of the states and Washington, D.C., committed to two-year goals or milestones detailing the programs and practices intended to be met in the near-term to achieve the 2017 and 2025 long-term goals. The milestones are a critical accountability tool, providing the opportunity to measure progress in the context of long-term Bay restoration efforts. Because of the impor- tance of the milestones, the Chesapeake Bay Foundation and the Choose Clean Water Coalition are collab- orating to evaluate and publicize pollution-reduction progress. This report evaluates, for select practices, whether Washington, D.C., achieved its 2012/2013 two-year milestone goals and whether or not this progress is on a trajectory to achieve 60 percent implementation by 2015 and full implementation by 2025. Conclusion Washington, D.C., has exceeded 2013 goals for four out of the six practices selected for evaluation. Wash- ington, D.C., compensated for its two unachieved milestones by exceeding goals in other, more efficient, practices like infiltration practices and impervious surface reduction. We commend D.C. leaders and the District Department of the Environment (DDOE) for achieving their clean-up reductions early and setting more stringent expectations under the Sustainable D.C. Plan. However, we urge Washington, D.C., to recognize the value of setting bi-annual milestones that reflect its implementation plans so that reported data accurately represents D.C.’s commitment to pollution reduc- tions. The District will need to account for substantial commitments remaining in impervious surface re- ductions, tree planting, and urban stream restoration. As such, DDOE has developed ambitious milestone goals for 2015 that will encourage significant progress toward D.C.’s 2025 goals. In addition, the District must redouble efforts to reduce nitrogen pollution. Recent efforts like the 2012 passage of fertilizer regulations, a commitment to fifteen-million-square feet of urban polluted runoff retrofits per year, and increased incentives for landowners to manage runoff, will reduce nitrogen pollution. We commend DDOE for adopting the new polluted runoff rule and wetlands regulations in 2013, imple- menting a new credit trading policy, and consolidating polluted runoff permit implementation plans. Washington, D.C., has established itself as a regional and national leader through its commitment to pollution reduction. We call on the mayor-elect for a formal commitment to clean-water plans within established deadlines. June 2014 AT A GLANCE Urban/Suburban Urban Tree Planting Stormwater Infiltration Practices Stormwater Ponds Street Sweeping Impervious Surface Reduction Urban Stream Restoration See the charts on the inside of this sheet for more information. For more detailed information on all of Washington, D.C.’s milestone goals, go to: www.epa.gov/reg3wapd/ tmdl/Chesapeake Bay/Ensur- ingResults.html. 2012/2013 FINAL ASSESSMENT Washington, D.C. Milestones 6 Herndon Avenue | Annapolis, Maryland 21403 888/SAVEBAY | cbf.org How this Report was Compiled We selected a subset of implemented practices within two pollution source categories—urban/suburban sources and waste- water treatment—based on their potential to provide substantial nitrogen, phosphorus, and sediment pollution reductions and offer important lessons for implementation moving forward. For each practice, progress (% achievement) was evaluated by looking at incremental progress between the base year, 2011, and 2013, compared to the 2013 milestone goal. Progress during this mile- stone period was also compared to the long-term (2017 and 2025) implementation benchmarks that the states and Washing- ton, D.C., committed to in their Watershed Implementation Plans. Data were provided by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s Chesapeake Bay Program Office. 706 Giddings Avenue 1-B | Annapolis, Maryland 21401 443/759-3400 | choosecleanwater.org Pollution Reduction in Washington, D.C., at a Glance Washington, D.C., has seen net reductions in nitrogen, phos- phorus, and sediment pollution. However, nitrogen and sedi- ment load reductions from the urban sector are not on track to meet the long-term goals. This should be of greatest concern to Washington, D.C., leaders as the population grows and cre- ates pressures that exacerbate polluted runoff. Success Story Canal Park is a new public community natural space in the heart of the recently revitalized Capital Riverfront area of southeast Wash- ington, D.C.The award-winning park’s design incorporates advanced sustainability features for polluted-runoff management and water use. Canal Park is an example of what diverse public and private partnerships can accomplish in the name of cleaner waterways and community revival.Today,Washington, D.C., residents can enjoy this public natural space while its aesthetic environmental site design improves the natural environment. This historic park was first conceptualized in the late 1990s when The W.C. Smith Company purchased and invested in land along the Washington Canal that largely consisted of vacant lots and aban- doned warehouses.Today, this once-desolate area is a redeveloped, river-friendly community, bringing economic prosperity back to the southeast region of the city. 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 2025201720132011 2025 GOAL POLLUTED RUNOFF WASTEWATER 2017 GOAL Modeled Nitrogen Loads and Long Term Goals in Washington, D.C., by Sector (thousands of pounds) Source: Chesapeake Bay Program Watershed Model 5.3.2 0 20 40 60 80 120 2025201720132011 POLLUTED RUNOFF 100 2025 GOAL WASTEWATER 2017 GOAL Modeled Phosphorus Loads and Long Term Goals in Washington, D.C., by Sector (thousands of pounds) Washington, D.C., has already exceeded its 2025 nitrogen-reduction goals by 220 percent. However, D.C. has only secured 4 percent of its 2017 nitrogen- reduction goal from urban runoff. Though D.C. has met its 2025 nitrogen reductions through wastewater treatment,it must accelerate efforts to address the greater challenge of polluted runoff. As of 2013, Washington, D.C.’s, total phosphorus load is decreasing, but it has only achieved 33 percent of its 2025 goal for phosphorus reductions from pol- luted runoff.We encourageWashington,D.C.,to commit to achieving these phos- phorus reductions for polluted runoff despite exceeding total reduction goals. *Pollution reduction is ahead of schedule for this sector. * *