Presented March 27, 2012 to the Dallas Chapter of the American Institute of Chemical Engineers. Provides a broad overview of the new NESHAP and NSPS for Oil and Gas
The Coffee Bean & Tea Leaf(CBTL), Business strategy case study
Implications of the New NESHAP/NSPS for the Oil and Gas Sector
1. Implications of the New
NESHAP/NSPS (MACT) for the
Oil & Gas Sector
Presented by
Cindy Bishop
(B.S.Ch.E.)
1
American Institute of Chemical Engineers
Dallas Chapter
March 27, 2012
2. Implications of the New
NESHAP/NSPS (MACT) for the
Oil & Gas Sector
I. What Has Changed?
II. Who Is Affected?
III.What Needs to Be Done?
IV.When Does it Happen?
V. What If You Don’t Do it?
2
3. Clean Air Act Section 111
EPA Must List Categories of Stationary
Sources That Cause or Contribute
Significantly to Air Pollution
EPA Must Issue Performance
Standards for Each Category
―Best System of Emission
Reduction‖
Cost
Non-air Impacts
Energy Requirements
3
ORIGIN
4. 4
NSPS (40 CFR Part 60) – New Source Performance
Standards
• New and Modified Sources
• Industry Specific
• Focus on Criteria Pollutants (VOCs, SO2)
• EPA Review Required Every 8 Years
ORIGIN
5. 5
ORIGIN
NSPS (continued)
1979 – Oil & Gas Production Placed on EPA’s
Priority List
June 24, 1985 - NSPS for leaking
components at gas processing plants (KKK)
October 1, 1985 – SO2 regulations from
natural gas processing (LLL)
6. 6
Clean Air Act Section 112
NESHAP (40 CFR Part 63) – National Emission
Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants
• New and Existing Sources
• Industry Specific
• Major Sources
MACT – Maximum Achievable Control Technology
Top 12%
No Cost Consideration
EPA Review Required Every 8 Years
ORIGIN
7. 7
ORIGIN
NESHAP (continued)
July 16, 1992 – EPA Published List of Major
and Area Source Categories, including Oil &
Gas Production
February 12, 1998 – Natural Gas
Transmission and Storage Added to List
June 17, 1999 – MACT Issued (HH & HHH)
January 3, 2007 – Area Sources
8. WHY NOW?
January 14, 2009 suit filed
February 4, 2010 – Settlement:
• Proposed Standards by July 28, 2011
• Final Action by February 28, 2012
8
10. Who Is Affected?
10
Operations from Well to Refinery or to Customer
•Onshore & Offshore
•Production (well completion and workover)
•Portable Equipment
•Storage
•Transmission
11. • Aug. 23, 2011 Rule Proposed Published
• Oct. 24, 2011 Comment Deadline
• April 3, 2012 Final Rule
• ???
11
When Does it Happen?
12. What Has Changed?
NSPS
Revised:
• Equipment Leaks (KKK)
• SO2 (LLL)
New (OOOO):
• Hydraulic Fracturing
• Gas-driven Pneumatic Devices, Centrifugal and
Reciprocating Compressors
• Storage Vessels
Applies to new facilities that were constructed or
modified after August 23, 2011
12
13. What Has Changed?
NESHAP
Revised
• Oil & Gas Production Facilities (HH)
• Gas Transmission and Storage (HHH)
New
• Small Glycol Dehydrators
• Storage Vessels at Major Sources
Must Notify EPA within 1 year after rule becomes
final
13
14. 14
Oil & Gas Production, Transmission, and Distribution
(OOOO)
Applies to all construction, modification or
reconstruction after August 23, 2011
Includes fracking or refracking existing wellhead
Compliance date: date of final rule publication.
NSPS
15. 15
Oil & Gas Production, Transmission, and Distribution
(OOOO)
Reduced Emission Completion (―REC‖)
•Route gas during flowback into collection system
•Use sandtraps, surge vessels, separators, and tanks
during flowback and cleanout operations
•Capture and direct flowback emissions that cannot
be routed to a gathering line to a combustion device
(flare)
NSPS
16. 16
Oil & Gas Production, Transmission, and Distribution
(OOOO)
Compressor standards
•Rotating compressor: dry seal system
•Reciprocating compressor: replace rod packing
before 26,000 operating hours
Pneumatic controller: zero emissions of natural gas if
at gas processing plant, otherwise no more than 6 scfh
(switch to compressed air driven from gas controller)
NSPS
17. 17
Oil & Gas Production, Transmission, and Distribution
(OOOO)
Condensate and Crude Oil Storage Tanks
If :
•At least one barrel per day condensate
or
•At least 20 barrels per day crude oil;
Then, 95% VOC emission reduction
NSPS
18. 18
Sulfur Recovery Units at Onshore Gas Processing
Plants
SO2 standards:
• Feed rates of 5 tons per day or greater or
• With an acid gas stream H2S concentration of
50% or greater
•SO2 emission reduction of 99.9% (was 99.8%)
NSPS
19. 19
LDAR (Subpart VVa instead of VV)
Applies to onshore gas processing plants
•Lower ―leak‖ threshold
•Monitoring connectors
NSPS
20. 20
Startup, Shutdown, Malfunction
•No ―Free Pass‖ During Startup and Shutdown
•Affirmative Defense for Malfunctions
•Sudden
•Infrequent
•Not reasonably preventable
•Not caused by poor maintenance or careless
operation
NSPS
21. 21
Registration/recordkeeping
•Construction, startup, and modification notifications
•Well registration and 30-day notification prior to each
well completion
•Annual Compliance Certification
•Third Party verification
•Electronic reporting
•Over 20,000 completions and recompletions annually
NSPS
25. 25
NESHAP Subparts HH & HHH
Addition of Small Glycol Dehydrators
•Oil & Gas Production: gas flowrate < 85,000 scmd or
0.90 Mg/yr benzene emissions
•Existing sources: 1.10 x 10-4 g BTEX/scm
•New sources: 4.66 x 10-6 g BTEX/scm
•Gas Transmission & Storage: gas flowrate < 283,000 scmd or
0.90 Mg/yr benzene emissions
•Existing sources: 6.42 x 10-5 g BTEX/scm
•New sources: 1.10x 10-5 g BTEX/scm
•Types of control: process vent » control device or closed-
vent system
26. 26
NESHAP Subparts HH & HHH
Storage Vessels
95% reduction of HAPs for all storage vessels
•Process modifications
•Flare
•Incinerator
•Carbon Filter
•Condenser
Performance Testing of Control Device
Elimination of Startup, Shutdown & Malfunction
Exemption (See NSPS)
27. 27
NESHAP Subparts HH & HHH
Compliance dates:
Existing sources: 3 years after the date of final rule
publication
New sources (commenced construction on or after August
23, 2011): immediately upon startup or the date of final
rule publication, whichever is later
28. 28
What has industry said?
Rules will slow drilling, cut natural gas production
and reduce royalties (API)
Equipment for capturing emissions during
completions is unlikely to be as readily available as
EPA assumed, and equipment would have to spend
more time at each site than estimated.
29. What If You Don’t Do it?
• EPA can make you do it
• Civil Penalties up to $25,000/day/violation
• Criminal Penalties $250,000 per day per
violation and up to five years in jail.
Corporations are subject to up to $500,000 per
day per violation.
• $10,000 bounty
29
30. EPA Region 6 2011—2013 National Enforcement Initiatives
1. Keeping raw sewage and contaminated stormwater out of our nation’s
waters
2. Preventing animal waste from contaminating surface and ground waters
3. Cutting Toxic Air Pollution that Affects Communities’ Health
4. Reducing Widespread Air Pollution from the Largest Sources, especially the
Coal-Fired Utility, Cement, Glass, and Acid Sectors
5. Reducing pollution from mineral processing operations
6. ASSURING ENERGY EXTRACTION SECTOR COMPLIANCE WITH
ENVIRONMENTAL LAWS
―To address these emerging problems, EPA will develop an initiative to
assure that energy extraction activities are complying with federal
requirements‖
30
31. Stay on top of the rules –be organized!
Look for exemptions
Start reviewing operations now – do not wait until
the rules are final.
Look for innovative/emerging technology
EPA favors those who voluntarily disclose
problems.
31
32. Implications of the New
NESHAP/NSPS (MACT) for the
Oil & Gas Sector
Presented by
Cindy Bishop
32
214-893-5646
cbishop@cbishoplaw.com
www.cbishoplaw.com