This document summarizes a presentation on the giant single-celled alga Caulerpa taxifolia. It discusses how C. taxifolia exhibits intracellular patterns of gene expression that coincide with pseudo-organs, similar to the molecular patterning seen in land plant organs. This raises questions about potential molecular homology between algal pseudo-organs and plant organs. The presentation also examines outstanding questions about intracellular transport, nuclear equivalence, and the potential for a soma-germline divide in these giant coenocytes. Overall, it explores how complex morphologies can arise without multicellularity through intracellular gene regulation and signaling.
Plant architecture without multicellularity: an intracellular transcriptomic atlas of a giant, single-celled alga
1. Plant architecture
without multicellularity:
An intracellular
transcriptomic atlas of a
giant, single-celled alga
Dan Chitwood
Donald Danforth Plant Science Center
74th Society for Developmental Biology
July 11, 2015
3. Independent origins of multicellularity
Opisthokonts
Streptophytes
Viridiplantae
Plantae
Chlorophytes
Rhodophytes
Algae
(polyphyletic)
M Abedin & N King (2010)
Trends in Cell Biology
4. Independent origins of multicellularity
Opisthokonts
Streptophytes
Viridiplantae
Plantae
Chlorophytes
Rhodophytes
Algae
(polyphyletic)
M Abedin & N King (2010)
Trends in Cell Biology
5. Independent origins of multicellularity
Opisthokonts
Streptophytes
Viridiplantae
Plantae
Chlorophytes
Rhodophytes
Algae
(polyphyletic)
M Abedin & N King (2010)
Trends in Cell Biology
11. Cell vs. Organismal Theory:
Plant development ≠ Animal development
Kaplan and Hagemann (1991)
BioScience
12. Cell vs. Organismal Theory:
Plant development ≠ Animal development
1) Plasmodesmata, symplasm
Kaplan and Hagemann (1991)
BioScience
Cilia and Jackson (2004)
Curr Opin in Cell Biol
13. Kaplan and Hagemann (1991)
BioScience
Cell vs. Organismal Theory:
Plant development ≠ Animal development
1) Plasmodesmata, symplasm
2) Phragmoplasts
14. Kaplan and Hagemann (1991)
BioScience
Cell vs. Organismal Theory:
Plant development ≠ Animal development
1) Plasmodesmata, symplasm
2) Phragmoplasts
3) Cell lineage patterns
15. Kaplan and Hagemann (1991)
BioScience
Cell vs. Organismal Theory:
Plant development ≠ Animal development
1) Plasmodesmata, symplasm
2) Phragmoplasts
3) Cell lineage patterns
16. Brukhin, Curtis, Grossniklaus (2005)
Current Science
Cell vs. Organismal Theory:
Plant development ≠ Animal development
1) Plasmodesmata, symplasm
2) Phragmoplasts
3) Cell lineage patterns
4) Coenocytic female gametophyte
17. Kaplan and Hagemann (1991)
BioScience
Cell vs. Organismal Theory:
Plant development ≠ Animal development
1) Plasmodesmata, symplasm
2) Phragmoplasts
3) Cell lineage patterns
4) Coenocytic female gametophyte
Conclusion: there is as much evidence to view
morphologically complex plants as coenocytes as
there is to consider them multicellular (at least in the
same sense as animals)
19. An intracellular transcriptomic atlas of the
giant coenocyte Caulerpa taxifolia
Why Caulerpa taxifolia?
1) Debatably world’s largest single-
celled organism
Ranjan et al. (2015)
PLOS Genetics
20. An intracellular transcriptomic atlas of the
giant coenocyte Caulerpa taxifolia
Why Caulerpa taxifolia?
1) Debatably world’s largest single-
celled organism
2) Can regenerate from any fragment
Ranjan et al. (2015)
PLOS Genetics
21. An intracellular transcriptomic atlas of the
giant coenocyte Caulerpa taxifolia
Why Caulerpa taxifolia?
1) Debatably world’s largest single-
celled organism
2) Can regenerate from any fragment
3) “Killer algae”—invasive
Ranjan et al. (2015)
PLOS Genetics
22. An intracellular transcriptomic atlas of the
giant coenocyte Caulerpa taxifolia
Why Caulerpa taxifolia?
1) Debatably world’s largest single-
celled organism
2) Can regenerate from any fragment
3) “Killer algae”—invasive
4) Endosymbiotic bacteria
Ranjan et al. (2015)
PLOS Genetics
23. An intracellular transcriptomic atlas of the
giant coenocyte Caulerpa taxifolia
Why Caulerpa taxifolia?
1) Debatably world’s largest single-
celled organism
2) Can regenerate from any fragment
3) “Killer algae”—invasive
4) Endosymbiotic bacteria
5) Convergent morphology with land
plants
Ranjan et al. (2015)
PLOS Genetics
43. More questions …
V Coneva & D Chitwood (2015)
Front Plant Sci
Future directions
1) Small RNA movement
2) mRNA movement
44. More questions …
V Coneva & D Chitwood (2015)
Front Plant Sci
Future directions
1) Small RNA movement
2) mRNA movement
45. More questions …
V Coneva & D Chitwood (2015)
Front Plant Sci
Future directions
1) Small RNA movement
2) mRNA movement
3) Are nuclei functionally
equivalent?
4) Soma-germline divide?
46. More questions …
V Coneva & D Chitwood (2015)
Front Plant Sci
Future directions
1) Small RNA movement
2) mRNA movement
3) Are nuclei functionally
equivalent?
4) Soma-germline divide?
5) Genome sequencing
47. More questions …
V Coneva & D Chitwood (2015)
Front Plant Sci
Future directions
1) Small RNA movement
2) mRNA movement
3) Are nuclei functionally
equivalent?
4) Soma-germline divide?
5) Genome sequencing
6) Intracellular
microbiome
48. Thanks!
Chitwood lab
Viktoriya Coneva
Margaret Frank
Sinha Lab
Aashish Ranjan
Brad Townsley
Yasunori Ichihashi
Funding
Gordon & Betty
Moore Foundation
Life Sciences Research
Fellowship