This document provides a summary of Marathon Oil UK's Dropped Object Prevention (DROPS) program. It discusses how Brae organization developed awareness of DROPS risks through incident reports. It outlines Marathon's overarching dropped object management standard operating procedure (SOP 715) that defines expectations around proactive, dynamic, and static DROPS measures. Proactive measures discussed include module safety audits, training, and hazard identification. Dynamic controls address working at heights, lifting, and cranes. Static controls involve integrity inspections, engineering specifications, and reliability monitoring. The document evaluates progress made in identifying potential drop hazards and adopting industry best practices. It recommends next steps like platform manager responsibility and continued training.
1. Where are we now?
D.Napier / W.Crawford
Dropped Object Progress
2. Background to DROPS programme
Brae organisation was developing a heightened awareness to DROPS risk
through Incident and Near Miss report patterns.
HSE during audits had challenged Marathon to consider how they manage
dropped objects.
Information from within Marathon Oil and out with the organisation were
showing that dropped objects were increasing in frequency.
It was identified that DROPS was not purely a Drilling and Drilling Derrick issue,
but had a much wider context to be considered.
2
3. Overarching Document (SOP 715)
In order to define clear expectations regarding DROPS Management key
document SOP 715 Dropped Object Management has been put in place.
Purpose of the document was to outline the key areas where MOUK would set
clear expectations in DROPS Management.
The document is configured in 3 elements;
Pro active Measures – checks, training and guidelines we can adopt to
help prevent creating DROPS
Dynamic Measures – processes or expectations that are defined to control
activities where there are known to be DROPS potential
Static Measures – Standards and checks that are part or our inspection
regimes to consider the potential from DROPS and other areas
3
5. Proactive Controls
Module safety audit
Module audits enhanced with clear structure
DROPS added as a specific consideration
Driven in in SAP as a maintenance function to ensure formal process in place and history
collected
DROPS Training and hazard hunts
20 persons from across the Brae work force had TTT from the DROPS group
Over 550 people in Brae been involved in cascade training from these people
Approaching 700 potential dropped objects identified and removed or made safe for removal
by specialised access at a later date across Brae facilities
Pre Task Assessments
Q4 upgrade process engaging in upgrading DROPS considerations
Working on elevated platforms
SOP provides guidance on temporary elevated areas (scaffolds)
And guidance on fixed structures
HES Expectations
Clear DROPS expectations defined for all in this booklet which is issued to all personnel.
5
6. Dynamic Controls
Working at Height – specific expectations in the following;
Abseiling
Scaffolding
Rigging
Lifting
Checks outline for Shore base role
To and from supply boat – deck crew tagging loads before moving
Around platform Deck - checks in place to minimise DROPS
Cranes
Daily checks
Routine Maintenance
Projects
Maintenance
Q4 control process where equipment lifted
6
7. Static Controls
Integrity
Specific rejection criteria defined within integrity inspection work
Adhoc reporting embraced within Integrity scope
NEXUS tracking system in place for flagging and tracking
Facilities Engineering
Defined specifications in place for material type, bolted connections
TMR process with a written scheme of examination
Reliability
Primary scope of Reliability team focus is built around the idea that effective
condition based monitoring reduces breakdown maintenance and reduces
needs for equipment maintenance and numerous DROPS issues
7
8. How well are we doing?
DROP teams have done an excellent job of engaging in a wide cross section of the
offshore team to identify all types of potential drops and completed a huge
number of hazards hunts
Module Inspections are in place for all 3 platforms and being driven from SAP and
managed within the Planning and Maintenance teams.
Best Practice taken from Supply Chain for transportation kit checklist adopted
offshore
MOUK fully engaged with DROPS forums for Industry sharing
Significant number of Good Catches raised re. DROPS
Overall DROPS focus in Braes at a very high level and showing positive results
8
9. What Do We Do Next?
Platform Managers take responsibility for managing DROP’s on their facilities,
providing support to platform DROP’s teams
Manage platform DROP’s lists appropriately
Carry out regular checks to ensure we are doing what we should be – PFM being
generated for each platform
Continued focus on potential risks from dropped objects
Training – continue to provide training for new to Brae personnel in dropped
object awareness
9