California Geological Survey – “Probabilistic Tsunami Modeling and Public Pol...
Resilience Planning in Oregon - Yumei Wang
1. Yumei Wang, DOGAMI
EERI Seattle, Feb 13, 2013
Resilience Planning in Oregon
Critical Energy
Infrastructure
Statewide
50-Year Vision
www.oregon.gov/omd/oem www.oregon.gov/puc/docs/DOGAMICEIHubreport-8-1-12-R1.pdf
2. OSSPAC’s Resilience Plan (Feb 2013)
6/16/2015 Y. Wang
• Kent Yu (Chair) & J Wilson (VC)
• Over 150+ contributors
• Industry & business driven
• Built on earlier work
• Gap Analyses
• Consensus: Recommendations
• 2011 Legislature Directive
www.oregon.gov/omd/oem
4. March 2011 Tohoku M9
Mirror image (but, Japan prepared)
Japan
(2011)
(Source NOAA)
Cascadia
(when?)
Y Wang, DOGAMI, 2013
5. OSSPAC Earthquake Commission
• Rep. Deb Boone’s House Resolution 3
April 18, 2011 after Japan’s disaster
• Directs OSSPAC to “lead & coordinate preparation of an
Oregon Resilience Plan that . . . makes
recommendations on policy direction to protect lives &
keep commerce flowing during & after a Cascadia
(megathrust) earthquake & tsunami.”
• Kent Yu, Ph.D. OSSPAC Chair, championed effort
6/16/2015 Y. Wang
6. Oregon Resilience Plan:
Seismic Resilience Goal
“Oregon citizens will not only be protected from
life-threatening physical harm, but because of
risk reduction measures & pre-disaster
planning, communities will recover more
quickly & with less continuing vulnerability
following a Cascadia subduction zone
earthquake & tsunami.”
6/16/2015 Y. Wang
8. 8 Task Groups
• Earthquake and Tsunami Scenario
• Business and Work Force
• Coastal Communities
• *Critical Buildings
• Transportation
• *Energy
• Information and Communications
• Water and Waste Water
6/16/2015 Y. Wang
9. 8 Task Groups Mission
1. Determine likely impacts of magnitude 9.0 Cascadia
earthquake & tsunami on its assigned sector, &
estimate time required to restore functions in that
sector if earthquake were to strike under present
conditions
2. Define acceptable timeframes to restore functions
after a future Cascadia earthquake to fulfill expected
resilient performance
3. Recommend changes in practice & policies that, if
implemented during the next 50 years, will allow
Oregon to reach desired resilience targets
6/16/2015 Y. Wang
10. Critical Buildings Task Group
Chairs: Ed Quesenberry and Trent Nagele
• *Emergency Operations Centers
• *Education facilities (K-12, College and University)
• *Healthcare facilities (Hospitals and MOBs)
• *Police and Fire Stations
• Critical government administration/services facilities
• Emergency sheltering facilities
• Community retail centers
• Financial/banking Buildings
• Residential Housing
• Killer buildings (URM and non-ductile RC buildings)
*2007 DOGAMI report with seismic scores
*2009 launched Oregon Seismic Rehabilitation Grant Program
6/16/2015 Y. Wang
11. CDRM
Cascadia Fault & 4 zones: 1) tsunami zone, 2) coast, 3) valley, 4) east
Determined Oregon’s 4 Zones
Source: I. Madin,
DOGAMI
Y Wang, DOGAMI, 2013
12. CDRM
Findings for Cascadia Magnitude 9 Scenario
Business Group
Tolerate 2 wks to 1 mo.
outages or gone …
Portland/Valley
-Electricity: 1 mo to 3 mo
-Water: 1 mo to 1 yr
-Fire/Police: 2 to 4 mo
-Healthcare Facilities: 18 mo Source: I. Madin,
DOGAMI
Y Wang, DOGAMI, 2013
13. Recommendations to 2013 Legislature
1. Undertake comprehensive assessments of key
structures & systems that underpin Oregon’s economy
2. Launch sustained program of capital investment in
Oregon’s public structures
3. Craft package of incentives to engage Oregon’s private
sector to advance seismic resilience
4. Update Oregon’s public policies
6/16/2015 Y. Wang
14. Resilience Planning in Energy Sector
6/16/2015 Y. Wang
5-yr effort: DOE,
PUC, DOGAMI
2012 DOGAMI
earthquake study
Co-authors:
Scott Miles, WWU
Steve Bartlett, UU
33. 6/16/2015 Y. Wang
Energy Sector’s Recommendations
1. OPUC provide oversight for seismic preparedness of energy operators that they
regulate
2. Develop new regulatory oversight for energy operators not regulated by OPUC, and
create engagement in seismic mitigation efforts for them
3. Energy operators conduct seismic vulnerability assessments of critical energy
infrastructure facilities and develop mitigation plans
4. Energy operators institutionalize long-term seismic mitigation programs and work with
the appropriate oversight authority
5. State provide immunity of liability, in statute, for seismic vulnerabilities that are
identified by the energy operators in their seismic vulnerability assessments
6. State provide statutory authority for prescriptive waivers of routine permitting
requirements for design, construction, and restoration of energy infrastructure, if in the
public interest and needed due to disaster
7. Form public-private partnership to evaluate the diversification of locations of liquid
fuels storage and new energy corridors
8. State require liquid fuel wholesale and retail operators to provide access to and
alternate means of delivering fuels
9. Evaluate options for improving power supply to coastal areas located outside of the
tsunami inundation zone
10. Public-private sector employee to ensure coordinated planning, information sharing,
and interoperability among critical organizations and agencies