Paul Sherry, PPL/IR Europe
Presented on 15th April 2015, at the session "EGNOS - the European Satnav Solution for Pilots" (2015 AERO Friedrichshafen, Germany).
3. Over
550
members
–
from
right
across
Europe
Not-‐for-‐profit
organisa4on
–
staffed
by
volunteers
Exists
to
support
the
GA
pilot
who
wishes
to
fly
IFR
Who
are
we
?
4.
5. Benefits
for
the
General
Avia4on
Community
Garmin
430
–
first
released
1998
Performance
Based
Naviga4on
Approved
for
RNAV5
&
RNAV1
6. Benefits
for
the
General
Avia4on
Community
GNSS
Approach
Procedures
What
does
SBAS
give
GA?
8. Benefits
for
the
General
Avia4on
Community
3,534
WAAS
LPV
approach
procedures
at
1725
airports
As
of
2nd
April
2015
9. Benefits
for
the
General
Avia4on
Community
How
many
SBAS
LPV
procedures
have
been
established
at
smaller
‘GA’
airfields
with
no
pre-‐exis4ng
IAP?
More
than
1500
0
or
as
near
to
ZERO
as
makes
no
prac4cal
difference
10. Benefits
for
the
General
Avia4on
Community
Fatal
Accidents
in
IFR
Opera4on
in
Europe
18. Pilot
Training
Accelera4ng
Implementa4on
Sec4on
Learning
Objec4ve
Page
PBN
Lateral
and
ver4cal
naviga4on
Lateral
and
ver.cal
naviga.on
guidance
refers
to
the
guidance
provided
either
by:
(a)
a
ground-‐based
radio
naviga.on
aid;
or
(b)
computer-‐generated
naviga.on
data
from
ground-‐based,
space-‐
based,
self-‐contained
naviga.on
aids
or
a
combina.on
of
these).
11,15
PBN
concept
(as
described
in
ICAO
doc
9613)
11
PBN
principles
List
the
factors
used
to
define
RNAV
or
RNP
system
performance
requirements
(accuracy,
integrity,
con.nuity
and
func.onality)
21
Explain
the
concept
of
con.nuity
21
Explain
the
concept
of
integrity
21
State
that,
unlike
conven.onal
naviga.on,
performance-‐based
naviga.on
is
not
sensor
specific.
11
Explain
the
difference
between
raw
data
and
computed
data
200
PBN
components
List
the
components
of
PBN
as
NAVAID
infrastructure,
naviga.on
specifica.on
and
naviga.on
applica.on
Iden.fy
the
components
from
an
example
12
20
Sec4on
Learning
Objec4ve
Page
PBN
scope
State
that
in
oceanic/remote,
enroute
and
terminal
phases
of
flight,
PBN
is
limited
to
opera.ons
with
linear
lateral
performance
requirements
and
.me
constraints
11
State
that
in
the
approach
phases
of
flight,
PBN
accommodates
both
linear
and
angular
laterally
guided
opera.ons
11
Naviga.on
Specifica.ons
RNAV
and
RNP
State
the
difference
between
RNAV
and
RNP
in
terms
of
the
requirement
for
on-‐board
performance
monitoring
and
aler.ng
10,13
Naviga4on
func4onal
requirements
List
the
basic
func.onal
requirements
of
RNAV
and
RNP
specifica.ons
(con.nuous
indica.on
of
lateral
devia.on,
distance/bearing
to
ac.ve
waypoint,
groundspeed
or
.me
to
ac.ve
waypoint,
naviga.on
data
storage
and
failure
indica.on)
67
Sec4on
Learning
Objec4ve
Page
Designa4on
of
RNP
and
RNAV
specifica4ons
Interpret
X
in
RNAV
X
or
RNP
X
as
the
lateral
naviga.on
accuracy
(total
system
error)
in
nau.cal
miles,
which
is
expected
to
be
achieved
at
least
95
per
cent
of
the
flight
.me
by
the
popula.on
of
aircra
opera.ng
within
the
airspace,
route
or
procedure.
13
State
that
aircra
approved
to
the
more
stringent
accuracy
requirements
may
not
necessarily
meet
some
of
the
func.onal
requirements
of
the
naviga.on
specifica.on
having
a
less
stringent
accuracy
requirement.
13
State
that
RNAV10
and
RNP4
are
used
in
the
oceanic/remote
phase
of
flight
18
State
that
RNAV5
is
used
in
the
enroute
and
arrival
phase
of
flight
19
State
that
RNAV2
and
RNP2
are
also
used
as
naviga.on
specifica.ons
19,18
State
that
RNP2
is
used
in
the
enroute,
and
oceanic/remote
phases
of
flight
18
State
that
RNAV1
and
RNP1
are
used
in
the
arrival
and
departure
phases
of
flight
19,20
State
that
RNP
APCH
is
used
in
the
approach
phase
of
flight
14,15
State
that
RNP
AR
APCH
is
used
in
the
approach
phase
of
flight
16,202
State
that
RNP
0.3
naviga.on
specifica.on
is
used
in
all
phases
of
flight
except
for
oceanic/remote
and
final
approach,
primarily
for
helicopters
16
31. Accelera4ng
Implementa4on
GNSS
Approaches
Next
Steps
in
UK…
UK
based
trial
of
LPV
approaches
To
be
based
at
‘non
instrument’
airports
On
line
data
collec4on
of
pilot
experience
Build
experience
and
confidence
–
pilots
and
NAA
Work
toward
wider
adop4on
&
lower
minima
Based
on
partnership
with
UK
CAA
32. Accelera4ng
Implementa4on
GNSS
Approaches
Support
welcome
Current
cost
of
a
GNSS
IAP
–
approx
€35,000
Significant
hurdle
for
smaller
GA
airports
Target
of
€
10,000
per
approach
Need
to
engage
with
NAA’s
on
ways
of
Specifically
–
cost
of
surveys
and
flight
valida4on
costs
…€’s
33. SUMMARY
Making
EGNOS
happen
for
GA
Pilot
Training
Equipment
Cer4fica4on
GNSS
Approaches
Pilot
Training
Equipment
Approaches