SlideShare une entreprise Scribd logo
1  sur  46
Singapore Presentation | January 28
2016 Edelman
Trust Barometer
Informed Public
‣ 8 years in 20+ markets
‣ Represents 15% of total global population
‣ 500 respondents in U.S. and China; 200 in all other countries
Must meet 4 criteria:
‣ Ages 25-64
‣ College educated
‣ In top 25% of household income per age group in each country
‣ Report significant media consumption and engagement in business news
General Online Population
‣ 5 years in 25+ markets
‣ Ages 18+
‣ 1,150 respondents per country
Methodology
28-country global data margin of error: General Population +/-0.6% (N=32,200), Informed Public +/- 1.2% (N=6,200), Mass Population +/- 0.6% (26,000). Country-
specific data margin of error: General Population +/- 2.9 ( N=1,150), Informed Public +/- 6.9% (N = min 200, varies by country), China and U.S. +/- 4.4% (N=500),
Mass Population +/- 3.0 to 3.6 (N =min 740, varies by country), half sample Global General Online Population +/- 0.8 (N=16,100).
‣ 16 years of data
‣ 33,000+ respondents total
‣ All fieldwork was conducted between
October 13th and November 16th, 2015
Online Survey in 28 Countries
Mass Population
‣ All population not including Informed Public
‣ Represents 85% of total global population
2
Trust in Retrospect
3
Rising Influence
of NGOs
2001
Business Must
Partner with
Government to
Regain Trust
2009
Fall of the
Celebrity CEO
2002
Earned Media
More Credible
Than Advertising
2003
U.S. Companies
in Europe Suffer
Trust Discount
2004
Trust Shifts from
“Authorities” to
Peers
2005
“A Person Like
Me” Emerges as
Credible
Spokesperson
2006
Business More
Trusted Than
Government
and Media
2007
Young Influencers
Have More Trust
in Business
2008
Trust is Now an
Essential Line
of Business
2010
Rise of
Authority
Figures
2011
Fall of
Government
2012
Crisis of
Leadership
2013
Business to
Lead the Debate
for Change
2014
Trust is
Essential to
Innovation
2015
Growing
Inequality
of Trust
2016
71
60
41
40
35
30
51
38
17
24
30
19
Trust Matters
Source: 2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Q371-589. Thinking back over the past 12 months, have you taken any of the following actions in relation to companies
that you trust? Please answer yes or no to each action. General Population, Singapore, question asked of half the sample. Q377-380. Still thinking about the past
12 months, have you taken any of the following actions in relation to companies that you do not trust? Please answer yes or no to each action. General Population,
Singapore, question asked of half the sample.
4
Percent who engage in each behavior based on trust
Behaviors for Distrusted Companies Behaviors for Trusted Companies
Refused to buy products/services
Criticized companies
Shared negative
opinions
Disagreed with others
Paid more than
wanted
Sold
shares
Chose to buy products/services
Recommended them to a friend/colleague
Shared positive opinions
Online
Defended company
Paid more
Bought
shares
most trusted
content creators:#1
Friends and
Family
most trusted
media source:#1
Search Engines
General
Population
1 State of Trust
55 Global 60 Global
82 China
78 India
74 UAE
72 Mexico
72 Singapore
70 Indonesia
64 U.S.
63 Australia
63 Canada
62 Netherlands
61 Colombia
84 UAE
79 India
78 Indonesia
75 China
65 Singapore
64 Netherlands
49 Ireland
47 Turkey
46 Sweden
42 Poland
42 Russia
41 Japan
48 Italy
48 S. Africa
47 Hong Kong
47 S. Korea
46 U.K.
45 Argentina
45 Poland
45 Russia
45 Spain
45 Sweden
40 Turkey
37 Ireland
37 Japan
58 Brazil
58 Italy
58 Malaysia
57 U.K.
55 France
54 S. Africa
53 Argentina
53 Spain
52 Hong Kong
51 Germany
50 S. Korea
59 Brazil
59 Mexico
56 Malaysia
53 Canada
52 Australia
52 France
52 U.S.
50 Germany
Trust Index:
Informed Public
Drives Rebound
Average trust in institutions,
Informed Public, 2015 vs. 2016
2015 2016
Informed Public
trust up 5 points
Trusters from 22% in
2015 to 39% in 2016
Distrusters from 48%
in 2015 to 21% in 2016
Trusters
Neutrals
Distrusters
6
The Trust Index is an average of a country’s trust in the
institutions of government, business, media and NGOs.
27-country global total.
49 Ireland
47 Turkey
46 Sweden
42 Poland
42 Russia
41 Japan
49 Australia
49 Italy
49 U.S.
47 Hong Kong
46 Spain
45 S. Africa
42 Germany
42 S. Korea
42 U.K.
41 France
41 Ireland
41 Turkey
39 Russia
38 Japan
37 Sweden
35 Poland
73 China
66 UAE
65 India
64 Singapore
62 Indonesia
60 Mexico
82 China
78 India
74 UAE
72 Mexico
72 Singapore
70 Indonesia
64 U.S.
63 Australia
63 Canada
62 Netherlands
61 Colombia
56 Canada
55 Colombia
52 Netherlands
51 Argentina
51 Malaysia
50 Brazil58 Brazil
58 Italy
58 Malaysia
57 U.K.
55 France
54 S. Africa
53 Argentina
53 Spain
52 Hong Kong
51 Germany
50 S. Korea
Trust Index:
General Population
Lags
Average trust in institutions,
Informed Public vs.
General Population, 2016
Nearly 6 in 10
countries are
distrusters among the
General Population
The Trust Index is an average of a country’s trust in the
institutions of government, business, media and NGOs.
28-country global total.
Informed
Public
General
Population
60 Global 50 Global
7
Trusters
Neutrals
Distrusters
49 Australia
49 Italy
49 U.S.
47 Hong Kong
46 Spain
45 S. Africa
42 Germany
42 S. Korea
42 U.K.
41 France
41 Ireland
41 Turkey
39 Russia
38 Japan
37 Sweden
35 Poland
73 China
66 UAE
65 India
64 Singapore
62 Indonesia
60 Mexico
57 Mexico
55 Canada
55 Colombia
52 Netherlands
50 Argentina
50 Malaysia
48 Brazil
47 Australia
47 Italy
46 Hong Kong
45 U.S.
44 S. Africa
44 Spain
42 Germany
40 S. Korea
40 U.K.
39 France
39 Ireland
39 Russia
39 Turkey
38 Japan
36 Sweden
34 Poland
71 China
65 UAE
62 India
62 Indonesia
62 Singapore
56 Canada
55 Colombia
52 Netherlands
51 Argentina
51 Malaysia
50 Brazil
Trust Index:
Mass Population
Left Behind
Average trust in institutions,
Informed Public vs. General
Population vs. Mass Population
For the mass
population,
17 of 28 countries
are distrusters
The Trust Index is an average of a country’s trust in the
institutions of government, business, media and NGOs.
28-country global total.
General
Population
Mass
Population
50 Global 48 Global
49 Ireland
47 Turkey
46 Sweden
42 Poland
42 Russia
41 Japan
82 China
78 India
74 UAE
72 Mexico
72 Singapore
70 Indonesia
64 U.S.
63 Australia
63 Canada
62 Netherlands
61 Colombia
58 Brazil
58 Italy
58 Malaysia
57 U.K.
55 France
54 S. Africa
53 Argentina
53 Spain
52 Hong Kong
51 Germany
50 S. Korea
Informed
Public
60 Global For the mass
population, the
global index falls into
distruster territory
8
Trusters
Neutrals
Distrusters
50%
Global Increase in Business Trust
Source: 2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Q11-14. [TRACKING] [BUSINESS IN GENERAL] Below is a list of institutions. For each one, please indicate how much
you trust that institution to do what is right using a nine-point scale where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great
deal.“ (Top 4 Box, Trust) Informed Publics, 27-country global total.
9
Percent trust in business, Informed Public, 2015 vs. 2016
+12 +10 +11 +10 +15 +17 +13 +14 +16 +10 +13 -12
Increased or equal trust in 22 Countries
Informed
Public
57
84
72 70
73
64
60 61
53
48
52
47 45 43
46 48
41
38
45 45
42
36
84 85
67 66
49
63
87
84
80
75 75
70 68 68
65
60 60 59 59
55
52 51 51
47 46
43
37
81 80
73
67
62
46
Global
India
Mexico
China
Brazil
S.Africa
U.S.
Singapore
Italy
Australia
U.K.
Canada
France
Spain
Argentina
Poland
Turkey
Ireland
Germany
Russia
HongKong
S.Korea
Colombia
Indonesia
UAE
Malaysia
Netherlands
Sweden
2015 2016
+12 +10 +11 +10 +15 +17 +13 +19 +16 +10 +13
45
64
55
48
52
54
51
45
41 42
39
41 41
34
31 30
33
28
18
70
68
62
50
46 45
39
42
38
47
73
60
58
55 55 54 53
50 49
47
45
43 42
39 38
36
31
23
55
63 63
59
47
45 44
38 38
34
Global
China
Singapore
Mexico
Canada
Netherlands
Brazil
Argentina
Italy
Spain
US
SouthAfrica
SouthKorea
Australia
Ireland
Japan
UK
Sweden
Turkey
Colombia
India
Indonesia
UAE
HongKong
Malaysia
Germany
France
Russia
Poland
50%
Media Increases and Decreases Across APACMEA
Source: 2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Q11-14. [MEDIA IN GENERAL] Below is a list of institutions. For each one, please indicate how much you trust that
institution to do what is right using a nine-point scale where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal.“ (Top 4
Box, Trust) General Population, 27-country global total.
10
Percent trust in media, General Population, 2015 vs. 2016
General
Population
+5
Increased trust in 6 APACMEA countries
2015 2016
+9 +4 +2 +8 +8 -7 -5 -3 -3 -1
Decreased trust in 5 APACMEA countries
41
75
68
47
51
37
44
41
35 36
34
30
28
22
27
23
15 16
83
68
65
51
48
40
46
27
32
23
42
79
74
53 53
45 45
42
39 39
36 35
32 32
30
26 26
16
32
80
65
58
49
45
39 39
24
21
19
Global27
China
Singapore
Canada
Russia
Australia
HongKong
Turkey
US
Japan
UK
SouthKorea
Mexico
Ireland
Italy
Argentina
Spain
SouthAfrica
Colombia
UAE
India
Indonesia
Netherlands
Sweden
Germany
Malaysia
France
Brazil
Poland
50%
Trust in Government Remains Relatively High in Asia
Source: 2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Q11-14. [GOVERNMENT IN GENERAL] Below is a list of institutions. For each one, please indicate how much you trust
that institution to do what is right using a nine-point scale where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal.“
(Top 4 Box, Trust) General Population, 27-country global total.
11
Percent trust in government, General Population, 2015 vs. 2016
General
Population
Increased/equal government trust in 7 APACMEA countries
+6 0
2015 2016
+4 +8 +1 +4 +5 -3 -3 -7 -7
50% 51
63
54
62
57 58 57
59
52 53 54
52 52 52
55
49
46 47
37
46
40
31
25
57
65
60
64
30
55
74
71 70
62 62 61 61 60
58 58 58 57 57 56 55
50 50 49 49
45
34
26
63
57
64
59 57
27
Global
Mexico
China
Argentina
Brazil
Singapore
Canada
Malaysia
Spain
Italy
SouthAfrica
SouthKorea
U.S.
Australia
France
Turkey
UK
Poland
Ireland
Netherlands
Germany
Japan
Sweden
Colombia
HongKong
India
UAE
Indonesia
Russia
NGO Trust Remains High in APACMEA
Source: 2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Q11-14. [NGOs IN GENERAL] Below is a list of institutions. For each one, please indicate how much you trust that
institution to do what is right using a nine-point scale where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal.“ (Top 4
Box, Trust) General Population, 27-country global total.
12
Percent trust in NGOs, General Population, 2015 vs. 2016
General
Population
Increased or equal trust in NGOs in 8 of 11 APACMEA countries
+2+17 0
2015 2016
+4 +4 +6 +5 +3 -1 -1 -7
64
75 76
71
76
56
60
64
58
62
73
82
75
70
76
71 72 73
68
74
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
66
77
71
61
68
59 60 60
57
60
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Source: 2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Q11-14. Below is a list of institutions. For each one, please indicate how much you trust that institution to do what is right
using a nine-point scale, where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal.” (Top 4 Box, Trust) Informed Public
and General Population, Singapore.
13
Percent trust in the four institutions of government, business, media and NGOs, 2012 vs. 2016
65
70 70
59
69
61 62
60
55
60
NGO’s
Government
Media
Business
Post-Recession Highs
Informed
Public
General
Population
2 Trust
Inequality
The Inversion of Influence
15
83%
of Population
62
Trust Index
17%
of Population
72
Trust Index
Informed
Public
Mass
Population
Source: 2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Q11-14. Below is a list of institutions. For each one, please indicate how much you trust that institution to do what is right
using a nine-point scale, where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal.” (Top 4 Box, Trust) Informed Public
and Mass Population, Singapore
Authority
& Influence
Influence
Authority
Influence
The Inversion of
Influence
16
Influence
& Authority
Authority
Old Model
‣ Elites have access
to more/better
information
‣ Elites’ interests
interconnected with
those of mass
‣ Becoming an “elite”
open to all
New Reality
‣ Peer-to-peer influence
more powerful than top-
down
‣ Increasing distrust
among mass population
‣ Mass movements based
on dissatisfaction and
urgency
The Divide
‣ Democratization of
information and more
information
‣ High-profile revelations
of greed and
misbehavior
‣ Income inequality
53
58
56 56
60
44
47
46 46
48
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
A Significant Divide Across the Globe; Similar Trend in Singapore
Source: 2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Q11-14. Below is a list of institutions. For each one, please indicate how much you trust that institution to do what is right
using a nine-point scale, where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal.” (Top 4 Box, Trust) Informed Public
and Mass Population, 25-country global total.
GDP 5 = U.S., China, Japan, Germany, U.K.
17
Percent trust in the four institutions of
government, business, media and NGOs, 2012 to 2016 Informed
Public
Mass
Population
12pt
Gap
9pt
Gap
in trust inequality--
which jumps to a
5-point increase
among the GDP5
3-point increase
A Global Phenomenon
Source: 2016 Edelman Trust Barometer. The Trust Index is an average of a country’s trust in the institutions of government, business, media and NGOs,
28-country global total.
18
Trust Index, Informed Public vs. Mass Population,
15 countries with double-digit trust gaps in 2016
Country
Informed
Public
Mass
Population Gap
U.S. 64 45 19
U.K. 57 40 17
France 55 39 16
India 78 62 16
Australia 63 47 16
Mexico 72 57 15
Italy 58 47 11
China 82 71 11
Brazil 58 48 10
Ireland 49 39 10
Netherlands 62 52 10
Sweden 46 36 10
S. Africa 54 44 10
S. Korea 50 40 10
Singapore 72 62 10
Trust Index 2012 – 2016, percentage point change in the size of
the trust gap between Informed Public and Mass Population
An Accelerating Disparity
Source: 2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Q11-14. Below is a list of institutions. For each one, please indicate how much you trust that institution to do what is right
using a nine-point scale where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal.“ (Top 4 Box, Trust) Informed Public
and Mass Population, 25-country global total, 2012 vs 2016.
GDP 5 = U.S., China, Japan, Germany, U.K.
19
Increased Gap Decreased Gap
Gap has increased in 16 of 25 countries
Global25
GDP5
France
U.K.
U.S.
Spain
Mexico
Singapore
S.Korea
Malaysia
India
China
Brazil
Germany
Australia
Ireland
Russia
Poland
Canada
Japan
Indonesia
Italy
Argentina
UAE
HongKong
Netherlands
2012 Gap 9 7 4 7 11 1 8 6 6 4 13 8 7 6 14 8 2 7 8 3 10 13 6 13 10 14 15
2016 Gap 12 12 16 17 19 9 15 10 10 8 16 11 10 9 16 10 3 8 8 3 8 11 3 9 6 10 10
Sweden
3
5
12
10
8 8
7
4 4 4
3 3 3 3
2 2
1 1
0 0
-2 -2
-3
-4 -4 -4
-5
50%
18 of 28 countries have a double-digit trust gap
between high-income and low-income respondents
Trust Index:
A Link to Income Inequality
Source: 2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Q13. Below is a list of institutions. For each one, please indicate how much you trust that institution to do what is right using a nine-point scale, where one means that you
“do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal.” (Top 4 Box, Trust) General Population, 28-country global total, lower vs. upper quartile income in each country. [“CEOs are fairly paid
relative to the rest of the workforce”]
GDP 5 = U.S., China, Japan, Germany, U.K.
20
Average trust in institutions, respondents in top quartile of income vs.
respondents in bottom quartile of income in each country,
ranked by the size of the gap between them
60
57
71
64
78 78
68
49
52
62
67
49
45 46
50
53
40
74
79
46
65
68
59
38
44
80
55
62
58
71
46
42 40
35
52
56
48
30 33
45
50
32 31 32
37
40
27
62
69
36
56
59
51
30
37
73
48
55 52
66
Global
GDP5
U.S.
France
Brazil
India
Netherlands
Russia
U.K.
Italy
Singapore
Japan
HongKong
Turkey
Sweden
Spain
Poland
Colombia
Mexico
Ireland
SouthAfrica
UAE
Argentina
SouthKorea
Germany
Indonesia
Australia
Malaysia
Canada
China
19192022262931
Low-income
respondents
High-income
respondents
50%
55
46
19 21
28
48
41
45
42
47
44
57
46
50
46
63
52
49
58 55 55
51
69
62 64
73 73
79 81
87
47
37
15
20
24
31 31 33 33 34 34
36 36 37
39
45 46 47 49 49 49
57
64 64 65
69 70
74
81 83
Global
GDP5
Japan
France
Germany
U.K.
Australia
Italy
S.Korea
Netherlands
Sweden
Poland
HongKong
Canada
Russia
U.S.
Singapore
Turkey
Ireland
S.Africa
Spain
Malaysia
Mexico
Argentina
Brazil
China
UAE
Indonesia
Colombia
India
In 19 of 28 countries, less than half of Mass Population
think they will be better off in five years
Mass Population Less Optimistic
Source: 2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Q445. Thinking about the economic prospects for yourself and your family, how do you think you and your family will be doing
in five years' time? (Top 2 Box, ‘Much better off than today,’ and ‘Somewhat better off than today.’) Informed Public and Mass Population, 28-country global total.
GDP 5 = U.S., China, Japan, Germany, U.K. 21
Percent of the Informed Public vs. Mass Population who
believe they and their families will be better off in five years’ time Informed
Public
Mass
Population
17 10 12 13 10 21 10 13 18
3 Leadership in a
Divided World
Actions
Leadership in a Divided World:
50%
55%
60%
65%
70%
75%
80%
85%
90%
Financial Services Rebounds
Source: 2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Q45-429. Please indicate how much you trust businesses in each of the following industries to do what is right. Again, please use the same 9-point scale where one
means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal”. (Top 4 Box, Trust) General Population, Singapore.
*From 2012-2014, Pharma included as subsector(Q61f-65f).
**From 2012-2015, Pharma included as an industry sector (Q43-60). 2012-2014 data recalibrated as a sector.
Trust in each industry sector, 2012 - 2016
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Industry 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
5 yr.
Trend
Technology 81% 76% 82% 77% 76% 5
Telecommunications 76% 70% 77% 69% 71% 5
Energy 69% 67% 71% 69% 69% 0
Food & Beverage 77% 71% 75% 68% 68% 9
Consumer Packaged Goods 70% 67% 70% 67% 64% 6
Financial Service 64% 59% 66% 62% 64% 0
Automotive 68% 68% 76% 69% 63% 5
Pharmaceutical 76% 68% 72% 68% 62% 14
General
Population
24
Global
2016
74%
60%
58%
64%
61%
51%
60%
53%
66 66 66
64
62 62
60 59
56
54
47
45
42
33
31 30 29
Canada
Sweden
Switzerland
Germany
Australia
U.K.
Japan
Netherlands
U.S.
France
Italy
Spain
SouthKorea
China
Brazil
India
Mexico
Developed Markets More Trusted
Source: 2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Q26-Q422. Now we would like to focus on global companies headquartered in specific countries. Please indicate how
much you trust global companies headquartered in the following countries to do what is right. Use the same nine-point scale, where one means that you “do not
trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal.” (Top 4 Box, Trust) General Population, 25-country global total.
25
Trust in companies headquartered in each country, and percentage
point change, 2012 vs. 2016
+6 -2 +6 +8 -2+1+1n/a+1+4+5+3 +2 +2 +1 0 +3
4 Year
Trend
General
Population
76
68 69
76
70 70 67
75
62 60 60
74
63
68 66
71
NGOs Business Media Government
Business Most Trusted to Keep Pace
Source: 2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Q11-14. Below is a list of institutions. For each one, please indicate how much you trust that institution to do what is right using a nine-point scale, where one means that
you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal.” (Top 4 Box, Trust), Informed Public and General Population, 27-country global total. Q441-444 Below is a list of institutions. For
each one, please indicate how much you trust that institution to keep up with the changing times using a 9-point scale where one means that you “do not trust them at all to keep up with change” and nine means
that you “trust them a great deal to keep up with change”. (Top 4 Box, Trust) Informed Public and General Population, Singapore 26
Percent trust, and percent who trust each institution to keep up
with the changing times, 2016
Informed
Public
General
Population
Trust Trusted to
keep paceBusiness in the lead
Business Must Lead to Solve Problems
Source: 2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Q249. Please indicate how much you agree or disagree with the following statement? (Top 4 Box, Agree). General
Population, Singapore, question asked of half the sample.
.
81% agree
“A company can take
specific actions that both
increase profits and improve
the economic and social
conditions in the community
where it operates.”
up from 75% in 2015
General
Population
27
Access to education/training
Address income inequality
Access to healthcare
Protecting/improving the environment
Reducing poverty
Supporting human & civil rights
Modern infrastructure
E
E
P
H
Source: 2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Q561-573 Thinking about businesses in your country, how important is it that they play a role in solving each of the following societal issues?
Please use a nine-point scale where one means that it is “not at all important” and nine means that it is “extremely important”. (Top 4 Box, Importance) General Population, 28-country
global total, question asked of one quarter the sample.
Societal
Expectations
Vary
28
Most important issue for
business to address in
each country
Canada
Brazil
Germany
France
China
U.S.
Poland
Argentina
Sweden
Mexico
U.K.
Ireland
Netherlands
Turkey
Singapore
Hong Kong
Malaysia
Colombia
Japan
Australia
Russia
S. Korea
Italy
Spain
Indonesia
UAE
S. Africa
India
General
Population
R
I
I
E
E
R
H
E
E
E
E
E
P
P
E
H
P
E
H
H
H
E
E
E
E
E
P
I
H
E
I
Integrity 48% 24% 24%
Has Ethical Business Practices 50% 24% 26%
Takes Responsible Actions To Address An Issue Or A Crisis 47% 25% 22%
Has Transparent And Open Business Practices 46% 22% 24%
Engagement 46% 23% 23%
Treats Employees Well 45% 25% 20%
Listens To Customer Needs And Feedback 49% 25% 24%
Places Customers Ahead Of Profits 47% 22% 25%
Communicates Frequently And Honestly On The State Of Its Business 43% 22% 21%
Products 37% 24% 13%
Offers High Quality Products Or Services 48% 25% 23%
Is An Innovator Of New Products, Services Or Ideas 26% 22% 4%
Purpose 33% 20% 13%
Works To Protect And Improve The Environment 38% 22% 16%
Creates Programs That Positively Impact The Local Community 32% 19% 13%
Addresses Society's Needs In Its Everyday Business 34% 20% 14%
Partners With NGOs, Government And Third Parties To Address Societal Issues 27% 17% 10%
Operations 30% 22% 8%
Has Highly-Regarded And Widely Admired Top Leadership 33% 22% 11%
Ranks On A Global List Of Top Companies, Such As Best To Work For Or Most Admired 25% 22% 3%
Delivers Consistent Financial Returns To Investors 31% 22% 9%
Trust Building
Source: 2016 Edelman Trust
Barometer Q80-95 How important is
each of the following attributes to
building your TRUST in a company?
Use a 9-point scale where one means
that attribute is “not at all important to
building your trust” and nine means it
is “extremely important to building
your trust” in a company. (Top 2 Box,
Importance) Q114-129 Please rate
businesses in general on how well
you think they are performing on each
of the following attributes. Use a 9-
point scale where one means they are
"performing extremely poorly" and
nine means they are "performing
extremely well". (Top 2 Box,
Performance) Singapore.
Company Importance vs. Performance
%
Importance
%
Performance Gap
General
Population
30
Purpose Impacts Trust
Percent who cite each as a reason for why their trust in business has increased or decreased
Source: 2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Q328-329. For which of the following reasons, if any, has your trust in each institution listed below increased over the past year? Q330-331. For which
of the following reasons, if any, has your trust in each institution listed below decreased over the past year? General Population, Singapore.
Reasons Trust in
Business Has Increased
Reasons Trust in
Business Has Decreased
Produces
economic growth
Contributes to the
greater good
Helps me and my
family live a fulfilling life
Fails to contribute
to the greater good
Does not have good
leadership
Lacks economic growth
54%
43%
36%
45%
40%
38%
General
Population
31
Role of the CEO
Leadership in a Divided World:
58
55
50
47
43
46 46
39 38
58 57
54 53
50
48
43 43
39
Peers, Employees More Credible than Leaders
Source: 2016 Edelman. Trust Barometer Q130-587. Below is a list of people. In general, when forming an opinion of a company, if you heard information about a
company from each person, how credible would the information be—extremely credible, very credible, somewhat credible, or not credible at all? (Top 2 Box,
Very/Extremely Credible) General Population, Singapore, question asked of half the sample.
33
Percent who rate each spokesperson as extremely/very credible
2015 2016
+7+6
Technical
Expert
Academic
Expert
A person
like
yourself
Financial
Industry
Analyst
EmployeeCEO NGO
representative
Board of
Directors
Government
official/regul
ator
CEO credibility
increased the most
General
Population
CEO Focus Misplaced
Source: 2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Q451-461. Thinking about CEOs, how strongly do you agree or disagree with the following statements? (Top 4 Box, Agree/Bot 5 Box, Disagree)
General Population, Singapore. [‘CEOs do too much lobbying,’ ‘CEOs can be trust to create jobs,’ ‘Given that the average tenure of CEOs is just 4 years, CEOs aren’t in their role long enough
to make a positive impact,’ ‘CEOs are too focused on short-term financial results,’]
34
Percent who agree with each statement about CEOs
Too Much
Focus on short-term
financial results69%
Lobbying51%
Not Enough
Job creation51%
Positive
long-term impact64%
General
Population
Purpose and Profits Matter
Source: 2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Q496-506. How visible do you think a CEO should personally be in these different types of business situations? Please
use a 9-point scale where one means that it is “not visible at all” and nine means that it is “extremely visible”. (Top 4 Box, Visible) General Population, Singapore,
question asked of half the sample.
35
Percent who agree that CEOs should be personally visible in discussing…
78%
Societal
Issues
‣ Income inequality
‣ Public policy discussions
‣ Personal views on
societal issues
71%
Financial
Results
General
Population
Integrity 42 19 23
Exhibits highly ethical behaviors 41 16 25
Takes responsible actions to address an issue or crisis 46 25 21
Behaves in a way that is transparent and open 40 15 25
Engagement 39 16 23
Treats employees well 42 17 25
Listens to customer needs and feedback 39 17 22
Places customer ahead of profits 40 14 26
Communicates frequently and honestly on the state of their company 36 16 20
Products 31 23 8
Places a premium on offering high quality products or services 32 23 9
Is focused on driving innovation and introducing new products/services/ideas 31 24 7
Purpose 29 18 11
Is dedicated to protecting and improving the environment 29 14 15
Ensures that the company creates programs that positively impact the local community in which it
operates
31 20 11
Ensures that the company addresses society's needs in its everyday business 33 21 12
Ensures that the company partners with NGOs, government and third parties to address societal
issues
23 18 5
Operations 27 21 6
Attracts and retains a highly-regarded and widely admired top leadership team 31 23 8
Is ranked on a global list of top CEOs, such as "The Best Performing CEOs in The World" 19 21 -2
Manages the company in a way that delivers consistent financial returns 32 19 13
Leaders Seen As Underperforming
Source: 2016 Edelman Trust
Barometer. Q462-478 How important
is each of the following attributes to
building your trust in CEOs? (Top 2
Box, Important) Q479-495 Please rate
CEOs on how well you think they are
performing on each of the following
attributes. Use a 9-point scale where
one means they are “performing
extremely poorly” and nine means
they are “performing extremely well.”
CEO questions use the same scales
as the business questions. (Top 2
Box, Performance) General
Population, Singapore
.
Importance vs. performance of 16 trust-building leadership attributes
%
Importance
%
Performance Gap
General
Population
36
Desired Leadership Qualities
Characteristics that make a CEO trustworthy, percent who
selected each as one of the top five in each region
37
cannot name any CEOs*
60% of global
respondents
North America
Honest 59%
Ethical 48%
Competent 26%
Transparent 26%
Sincere 24%
Latin America
Ethical 47%
Honest 44%
Competent 36%
Visionary 34%
Innovative 33%
Europe
Honest 53%
Competent 43%
Experienced 28%
Ethical 27%
Transparent 27%
APAC
Honest 39%
Visionary 35%
Decisive 31%
Ethical 31%
Competent 26%
General
Population
Source: 2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Q515. Which of the following personal characteristics make a CEO trustworthy? Please select the five most important
characteristics that make a CEO trustworthy. General Population, 28-country global total, question asked of half the sample.
* Source: 2016 Edelman Trust Barometer CEO Supplement Q1. Thinking about company CEOs in general, how many CEOs could you name in full? General
Population, 10-country global total.
66%
76%79%
85%
Their education and
how it shaped them
Their personal
success story
The obstacles
they have overcome
Their personal values
Personal Values and History Matter
Source: 2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Q507-514. Thinking about how a CEO communicates with a variety of groups and individuals, how important are each of the following activities a CEO could engage in?
Please use a 9-point scale where one means that attribute is “not at all important to building your trust” and nine means it is “extremely important to building your trust”. [Media Engagement net = Q507 ‘Interviews
with the media,’ and ‘Q512 ‘Sharing their views on a blog or on social media.’ Direct Engagement net = Q508 ‘Communications with employees,’ and ‘Participation in industry conferences.’] Q516-524. For you to
trust a CEO, how important is it that you have information on each of the following aspects of the CEO’s personal life outside of their business? Please use a 9-point scale where one means that attribute is “not at
all important to building your trust” and nine means it is “extremely important to building your trust. (Top 4 Box, Important) General Population, Singapore, question asked of half the sample.
Percent who agree that each type of information
is important in building trust in a CEO
General
Population
38
Employee
Advocacy
Leadership in a Divided World:
32 33
21
32
27
42
32
34
27
33
47
3332
24
48
19 19
26
19
15
22
24
19
15
12
15
10
19 20
17
8 9 9 9 8
10
Employees are Essential Advocates
Source: 2016 Edelman Trust Q610 Who do you trust MOST to provide you with credible and honest information about a company's financial earnings and operational performance, and top leadership’s accomplishments? Q611 A company’s
business practices and handling of a crisis: Who do you trust MOST to provide you with credible and honest information about a company’s business practices, both positive and negative, and its handling of a crisis? Q612 Who do you trust MOST
to provide you with credible and honest information about a company’s employee programs, benefits and working conditions, and how a company serves its customers and prioritizes customer needs ahead of company profits? Q613 Who do you
trust MOST to provide you with credible and honest information about a company’s partnerships with NGOs and effort to address societal issues, including those to positively impact the local community? Q614 Who do you trust MOST to provide
you with credible and honest information about a company’s innovation efforts and new product development? Q615 Who do you trust MOST to provide you with credible and honest information about a company’s stand on issues related to the
industry in which it operates? General Population, Singapore, question asked of half the sample.
40
Most trusted spokesperson to communicate each topic
Innovation effortsFinancial earnings &
operational
performance
Business practices/
crisis handling
Treatment of
employees/customer
Partnerships/
Programs to address
societal issues
Views on
industry issues
General
Population
Company CEO
Senior executive
Employee
Activist consumer
Academic
Media spokesperson
Company NOT
engaged in
societal issues
Company
engaged in
societal issues
Employee Advocacy Increases
With Societal Issue Engagement
41
Percent who agree with each statement, comparing those who work at
companies/for CEOs involved in addressing broader societal issues vs.
those who do not
61
60
55
60
64
64
75
Motivated to perform
Stay working for the company
Recommend company as an employer
Confidence in the future of the company
Committed to achieving our strategy
Recommend products and services to
others
Do the best possible job for the customer
Impact of
Company
Engagement
17
25
25
28
32
25
20
92
89
89
88
87
85
81
General
Population
Source: 2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Q527-529. Does your company and your company’s CEO get involved in addressing broader societal issues beyond the
core business, through programs or relationships with other companies? Q530-536. Thinking about your current company, please indicate how much you agree
with each of the following statements using a 9-point scale where one means that you “strongly disagree” and nine means that you “strongly agree”. (Top 4 Box,
Agree) General Population, Singapore, question asked of half the sample.
Earned Engagement
Leadership in a Divided World:
Transformed Media Landscape
Source: 2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Q178-182. When looking for general news and information, how much would you trust each type of source for general
news and information? Please use a nine-point scale where one means that you “do not trust it at all” and nine means that you “trust it a great deal.” (Top 4 Box,
Trust) General Population and Millennials, Singapore, question asked of half the sample.
Trust in each source for general news and information
*From 2012-2015, we included Online Search Engines as a media type. In 2016, we changed to Search Engines.
**From 2012-2015, we included Hybrid as a media type. In 2016, we changed this over to Online-Only.
General
Population
63
55
45
64
45
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Industry 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Millenials Gap
Search engines* 67 62 62 63 64 69% 5
Traditional media 75 68 70 62 63 65% 2
Online-only media** 58 50 53 48 55 61% 6
Owned media 49 45 48 43 45 49% 4
Social media 55 45 46 47 45 47% 2
Influence and Frequency of Media Sources
Source: 2016 Edelman Trust Barometer - How often do you read, view, click on or engage with the following types of content, media or information sources? Online
search engines, such as Google… (Q285), Television news and information (Q287), Social networking sites, such as Facebook, LinkedIn, Instagram, Twitter,
etc.(Net of Q278 Social Networking, Q279 Blogs, Q289 Online message boards, forums or newsgroups), articles in printed newspapers (Q284), articles in printed
magazines(Q283), Blogs (Q279) (Several times a week+) General Population, Singapore, question asked of half the sample. 44
Percent who use each media source several times a week or more
General
Population
Top 2 most-used
sources of news and
information are peer-
influenced media
70
69
65
55
31
24
Social
Search
TV
Newspapers
Magazines
Blogs
65
55 53
43 42
45
48
41
31
25
77
64 64
59
55 53 52
48
37
33
My friends
and family
An academic
expert
Companies
that I use
A company
CEO
Elected
officials
Employees of
a company
A journalist A well-known
online
personality
Celebrities Companies
[brands] I
don’t use
Every Voice Matters
Source: 2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Q598-609. Thinking about the information you consume, how much do you trust the information from each of the following
authors or content creators? (Top 4 Box, Trust) General Population, Singapore, question asked of half the sample.
* Asked as “Brands I don’t use” in 2015. 45
Percent who trust information created by each author on social networking
sites, content sharing sites and online-only information sources, 2015 vs. 2016 2015 2016
+12
General
Population
+13+16
50%
Actions
Values and
Role
Employee
Advocacy
Earned
Engagement
Embracing the
New Reality of Influence to
Address Trust Inequality
‣ Create societal impact in addition to profits through
purposeful action
‣ Express your values through honest, ethical
engagement in which you share your story
‣ Ignite your most powerful advocate, your employees
‣ Engage cross channel to meet stakeholders, where
they are, about what most interests/concerns them
Influence
TRUST
46
Leadership
TRUST
Thank You

Contenu connexe

Tendances

Tendances (20)

Edelman Trust Barometer - 2014 Australia Data
Edelman Trust Barometer - 2014 Australia DataEdelman Trust Barometer - 2014 Australia Data
Edelman Trust Barometer - 2014 Australia Data
 
2015 Edelman Trust Barometer India
2015 Edelman Trust Barometer India2015 Edelman Trust Barometer India
2015 Edelman Trust Barometer India
 
Edelman Trust Barometer 2007
Edelman Trust Barometer 2007Edelman Trust Barometer 2007
Edelman Trust Barometer 2007
 
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Hong Kong
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Hong Kong2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Hong Kong
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Hong Kong
 
Edelman Trust Barometer 2015 - Italy
Edelman Trust Barometer 2015 - ItalyEdelman Trust Barometer 2015 - Italy
Edelman Trust Barometer 2015 - Italy
 
2015 Edelman Trust Barometer Australia
2015 Edelman Trust Barometer Australia2015 Edelman Trust Barometer Australia
2015 Edelman Trust Barometer Australia
 
Edelman Trust Barometer 2016 - UK Results
Edelman Trust Barometer 2016 - UK ResultsEdelman Trust Barometer 2016 - UK Results
Edelman Trust Barometer 2016 - UK Results
 
Edelman Trust Barometer 2016 - UK Energy Sector Results
Edelman Trust Barometer 2016 - UK Energy Sector ResultsEdelman Trust Barometer 2016 - UK Energy Sector Results
Edelman Trust Barometer 2016 - UK Energy Sector Results
 
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer China - English
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer China - English2016 Edelman Trust Barometer China - English
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer China - English
 
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Hong Kong
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Hong Kong 2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Hong Kong
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Hong Kong
 
Trust in Asia Pacific, Middle East & Africa 2016
Trust in Asia Pacific, Middle East & Africa 2016Trust in Asia Pacific, Middle East & Africa 2016
Trust in Asia Pacific, Middle East & Africa 2016
 
Edelman Trust Barometer 2008
Edelman Trust Barometer 2008Edelman Trust Barometer 2008
Edelman Trust Barometer 2008
 
Edelman Trust Barometer 2015 - Food & Beverage - European Results
Edelman Trust Barometer 2015 - Food & Beverage - European ResultsEdelman Trust Barometer 2015 - Food & Beverage - European Results
Edelman Trust Barometer 2015 - Food & Beverage - European Results
 
2014 Edelman Trust Barometer: Financial Services Industry
2014 Edelman Trust Barometer: Financial Services Industry2014 Edelman Trust Barometer: Financial Services Industry
2014 Edelman Trust Barometer: Financial Services Industry
 
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Global Report
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Global Report2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Global Report
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Global Report
 
2014 Edelman Trust Barometer: Canadian Findings
2014 Edelman Trust Barometer: Canadian Findings2014 Edelman Trust Barometer: Canadian Findings
2014 Edelman Trust Barometer: Canadian Findings
 
2019 Edelman Trust Barometer
2019 Edelman Trust Barometer2019 Edelman Trust Barometer
2019 Edelman Trust Barometer
 
The Environics Communications 2016 CanTrust Index
The Environics Communications 2016 CanTrust IndexThe Environics Communications 2016 CanTrust Index
The Environics Communications 2016 CanTrust Index
 
2014 Edelman Trust Barometer: Global Energy Findings
2014 Edelman Trust Barometer: Global Energy Findings2014 Edelman Trust Barometer: Global Energy Findings
2014 Edelman Trust Barometer: Global Energy Findings
 
2015 Edelman Trust Barometer - Japan
2015 Edelman Trust Barometer - Japan2015 Edelman Trust Barometer - Japan
2015 Edelman Trust Barometer - Japan
 

En vedette

2014 Edelman Trust Barometer: Singapore Results
2014 Edelman Trust Barometer: Singapore Results2014 Edelman Trust Barometer: Singapore Results
2014 Edelman Trust Barometer: Singapore Results
David Brain
 
2012 Edelman Trust Barometer Hong Kong
2012 Edelman Trust Barometer Hong Kong2012 Edelman Trust Barometer Hong Kong
2012 Edelman Trust Barometer Hong Kong
David Brain
 
2012 Trust Barometer Hong Kong
2012 Trust Barometer Hong Kong2012 Trust Barometer Hong Kong
2012 Trust Barometer Hong Kong
Edelman
 
2013 Edelman Trust Barometer Singapore
2013 Edelman Trust Barometer Singapore2013 Edelman Trust Barometer Singapore
2013 Edelman Trust Barometer Singapore
Edelman APACMEA
 

En vedette (20)

2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Singapore
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Singapore2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Singapore
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Singapore
 
2017 Edelman TRUST BAROMETER™- Global Results
2017 Edelman TRUST BAROMETER™- Global Results2017 Edelman TRUST BAROMETER™- Global Results
2017 Edelman TRUST BAROMETER™- Global Results
 
2016 Earned Brand Japan
2016 Earned Brand Japan 2016 Earned Brand Japan
2016 Earned Brand Japan
 
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Indonesia
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Indonesia2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Indonesia
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Indonesia
 
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - India
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - India2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - India
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - India
 
2014 Edelman Trust Barometer: Singapore Results
2014 Edelman Trust Barometer: Singapore Results2014 Edelman Trust Barometer: Singapore Results
2014 Edelman Trust Barometer: Singapore Results
 
2012 Edelman Trust Barometer - Singapore Results
2012 Edelman Trust Barometer - Singapore Results2012 Edelman Trust Barometer - Singapore Results
2012 Edelman Trust Barometer - Singapore Results
 
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Korea
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Korea2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Korea
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Korea
 
2016 Edelman TRUST BAROMETER - Global Results
2016 Edelman TRUST BAROMETER - Global Results2016 Edelman TRUST BAROMETER - Global Results
2016 Edelman TRUST BAROMETER - Global Results
 
2012 Edelman Trust Barometer Hong Kong
2012 Edelman Trust Barometer Hong Kong2012 Edelman Trust Barometer Hong Kong
2012 Edelman Trust Barometer Hong Kong
 
2012 Trust Barometer Hong Kong
2012 Trust Barometer Hong Kong2012 Trust Barometer Hong Kong
2012 Trust Barometer Hong Kong
 
2013 Edelman Trust Barometer Singapore
2013 Edelman Trust Barometer Singapore2013 Edelman Trust Barometer Singapore
2013 Edelman Trust Barometer Singapore
 
2015 Earned Brand Australia
2015 Earned Brand Australia2015 Earned Brand Australia
2015 Earned Brand Australia
 
GA UXDI Project 2
GA UXDI Project 2GA UXDI Project 2
GA UXDI Project 2
 
2012 Edelman Trust Barometer Asia Pacific
2012 Edelman Trust Barometer Asia Pacific2012 Edelman Trust Barometer Asia Pacific
2012 Edelman Trust Barometer Asia Pacific
 
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Hong Kong
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Hong Kong2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Hong Kong
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Hong Kong
 
Trust in China and Europe 2016 (English)
Trust in China and Europe 2016 (English)Trust in China and Europe 2016 (English)
Trust in China and Europe 2016 (English)
 
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Hong Kong
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Hong Kong2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Hong Kong
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Hong Kong
 
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Japan
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Japan2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Japan
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Japan
 
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - China
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - China2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - China
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - China
 

Similaire à 2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Singapore

Barómatro de Confianza 2017 por Edelman- Trust barometer global report final
Barómatro de Confianza 2017 por Edelman- Trust barometer global report final Barómatro de Confianza 2017 por Edelman- Trust barometer global report final
Barómatro de Confianza 2017 por Edelman- Trust barometer global report final
Periodismo & Marketing Digital - Gemma Alcalá
 

Similaire à 2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Singapore (20)

Barómetro sobre CONFIANZA de Edelman 2016
Barómetro sobre CONFIANZA de Edelman 2016Barómetro sobre CONFIANZA de Edelman 2016
Barómetro sobre CONFIANZA de Edelman 2016
 
2016 trust barometer global master deck woolf institute
2016 trust barometer global master deck   woolf institute2016 trust barometer global master deck   woolf institute
2016 trust barometer global master deck woolf institute
 
Edelman Trust Barometer 2016 - Italian launch
Edelman Trust Barometer 2016 - Italian launchEdelman Trust Barometer 2016 - Italian launch
Edelman Trust Barometer 2016 - Italian launch
 
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - South Africa
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - South Africa2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - South Africa
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - South Africa
 
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer - Healthcare Sector Results
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer - Healthcare Sector Results2016 Edelman Trust Barometer - Healthcare Sector Results
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer - Healthcare Sector Results
 
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer - Financial Services Results
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer - Financial Services Results2016 Edelman Trust Barometer - Financial Services Results
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer - Financial Services Results
 
Edelman: Trust in Crisis
Edelman: Trust in CrisisEdelman: Trust in Crisis
Edelman: Trust in Crisis
 
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer - Food & Beverage Results
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer - Food & Beverage Results2016 Edelman Trust Barometer - Food & Beverage Results
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer - Food & Beverage Results
 
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer - Energy Results
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer - Energy Results2016 Edelman Trust Barometer - Energy Results
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer - Energy Results
 
Barómatro de Confianza 2017 por Edelman- Trust barometer global report final
Barómatro de Confianza 2017 por Edelman- Trust barometer global report final Barómatro de Confianza 2017 por Edelman- Trust barometer global report final
Barómatro de Confianza 2017 por Edelman- Trust barometer global report final
 
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer - Trust and the CEO
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer - Trust and the CEO2016 Edelman Trust Barometer - Trust and the CEO
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer - Trust and the CEO
 
2017 Edelman Ireland Trust Barometer
2017 Edelman Ireland Trust Barometer 2017 Edelman Ireland Trust Barometer
2017 Edelman Ireland Trust Barometer
 
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - South Africa
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - South Africa2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - South Africa
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - South Africa
 
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - South Africa Report
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - South Africa Report2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - South Africa Report
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - South Africa Report
 
Edelman Trust Barometer 2016: Ergebnisse Financial Services
Edelman Trust Barometer 2016: Ergebnisse Financial ServicesEdelman Trust Barometer 2016: Ergebnisse Financial Services
Edelman Trust Barometer 2016: Ergebnisse Financial Services
 
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Malaysia
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Malaysia2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Malaysia
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Malaysia
 
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Financial Services Results
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Financial Services Results2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Financial Services Results
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Financial Services Results
 
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - South Korea
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - South Korea2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - South Korea
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - South Korea
 
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Hong Kong Results
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Hong Kong Results2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Hong Kong Results
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Hong Kong Results
 
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - UAE
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - UAE2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - UAE
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - UAE
 

Plus de Edelman APACMEA

Plus de Edelman APACMEA (12)

2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - China
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - China2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - China
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - China
 
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Australia
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Australia2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Australia
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Australia
 
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Malaysia
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Malaysia2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Malaysia
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Malaysia
 
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - India
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - India2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - India
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - India
 
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Hong Kong
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Hong Kong2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Hong Kong
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Hong Kong
 
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Singapore
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Singapore2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Singapore
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Singapore
 
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Australia
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Australia2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Australia
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Australia
 
2016 Earned Brand India
2016 Earned Brand India2016 Earned Brand India
2016 Earned Brand India
 
2016 Earned Brand China
2016 Earned Brand China2016 Earned Brand China
2016 Earned Brand China
 
2016 Earned Brand Australia
2016 Earned Brand Australia2016 Earned Brand Australia
2016 Earned Brand Australia
 
Trust in China and Europe 2016 (Chinese)
Trust in China and Europe 2016 (Chinese)Trust in China and Europe 2016 (Chinese)
Trust in China and Europe 2016 (Chinese)
 
Edelman China Public Affairs Update - March 2016
Edelman China Public Affairs Update - March 2016   Edelman China Public Affairs Update - March 2016
Edelman China Public Affairs Update - March 2016
 

Dernier

FULL ENJOY Call Girls In Majnu.Ka.Tilla Delhi Contact Us 8377877756
FULL ENJOY Call Girls In Majnu.Ka.Tilla Delhi Contact Us 8377877756FULL ENJOY Call Girls In Majnu.Ka.Tilla Delhi Contact Us 8377877756
FULL ENJOY Call Girls In Majnu.Ka.Tilla Delhi Contact Us 8377877756
dollysharma2066
 
4 TRIK CARA MENGGUGURKAN JANIN ATAU ABORSI KANDUNGAN
4 TRIK CARA MENGGUGURKAN JANIN ATAU ABORSI KANDUNGAN4 TRIK CARA MENGGUGURKAN JANIN ATAU ABORSI KANDUNGAN
4 TRIK CARA MENGGUGURKAN JANIN ATAU ABORSI KANDUNGAN
Cara Menggugurkan Kandungan 087776558899
 

Dernier (20)

What is Google Search Console and What is it provide?
What is Google Search Console and What is it provide?What is Google Search Console and What is it provide?
What is Google Search Console and What is it provide?
 
Unlocking the Mystery of the Voynich Manuscript
Unlocking the Mystery of the Voynich ManuscriptUnlocking the Mystery of the Voynich Manuscript
Unlocking the Mystery of the Voynich Manuscript
 
VIP Call Girls Dongri WhatsApp +91-9833363713, Full Night Service
VIP Call Girls Dongri WhatsApp +91-9833363713, Full Night ServiceVIP Call Girls Dongri WhatsApp +91-9833363713, Full Night Service
VIP Call Girls Dongri WhatsApp +91-9833363713, Full Night Service
 
The+State+of+Careers+In+Retention+Marketing-2.pdf
The+State+of+Careers+In+Retention+Marketing-2.pdfThe+State+of+Careers+In+Retention+Marketing-2.pdf
The+State+of+Careers+In+Retention+Marketing-2.pdf
 
The Science of Landing Page Messaging.pdf
The Science of Landing Page Messaging.pdfThe Science of Landing Page Messaging.pdf
The Science of Landing Page Messaging.pdf
 
10 Email Marketing Best Practices to Increase Engagements, CTR, And ROI
10 Email Marketing Best Practices to Increase Engagements, CTR, And ROI10 Email Marketing Best Practices to Increase Engagements, CTR, And ROI
10 Email Marketing Best Practices to Increase Engagements, CTR, And ROI
 
Elevate Your Advertising Game: Introducing Billion Broadcaster Lift Advertising
Elevate Your Advertising Game: Introducing Billion Broadcaster Lift AdvertisingElevate Your Advertising Game: Introducing Billion Broadcaster Lift Advertising
Elevate Your Advertising Game: Introducing Billion Broadcaster Lift Advertising
 
Digital-Marketing-Into-by-Zoraiz-Ahmad.pptx
Digital-Marketing-Into-by-Zoraiz-Ahmad.pptxDigital-Marketing-Into-by-Zoraiz-Ahmad.pptx
Digital-Marketing-Into-by-Zoraiz-Ahmad.pptx
 
Busty Desi⚡Call Girls in Sector 49 Noida Escorts >༒8448380779 Escort Service
Busty Desi⚡Call Girls in Sector 49 Noida Escorts >༒8448380779 Escort ServiceBusty Desi⚡Call Girls in Sector 49 Noida Escorts >༒8448380779 Escort Service
Busty Desi⚡Call Girls in Sector 49 Noida Escorts >༒8448380779 Escort Service
 
Instant Digital Issuance: An Overview With Critical First Touch Best Practices
Instant Digital Issuance: An Overview With Critical First Touch Best PracticesInstant Digital Issuance: An Overview With Critical First Touch Best Practices
Instant Digital Issuance: An Overview With Critical First Touch Best Practices
 
FULL ENJOY Call Girls In Majnu.Ka.Tilla Delhi Contact Us 8377877756
FULL ENJOY Call Girls In Majnu.Ka.Tilla Delhi Contact Us 8377877756FULL ENJOY Call Girls In Majnu.Ka.Tilla Delhi Contact Us 8377877756
FULL ENJOY Call Girls In Majnu.Ka.Tilla Delhi Contact Us 8377877756
 
Analysis of Sineing Website and how to fix
Analysis of Sineing Website and how to fixAnalysis of Sineing Website and how to fix
Analysis of Sineing Website and how to fix
 
4 TRIK CARA MENGGUGURKAN JANIN ATAU ABORSI KANDUNGAN
4 TRIK CARA MENGGUGURKAN JANIN ATAU ABORSI KANDUNGAN4 TRIK CARA MENGGUGURKAN JANIN ATAU ABORSI KANDUNGAN
4 TRIK CARA MENGGUGURKAN JANIN ATAU ABORSI KANDUNGAN
 
Press Release Distribution Evolving with Digital Trends.pdf
Press Release Distribution Evolving with Digital Trends.pdfPress Release Distribution Evolving with Digital Trends.pdf
Press Release Distribution Evolving with Digital Trends.pdf
 
Welcome to DataMetricks Consulting (1).pptx
Welcome to DataMetricks Consulting (1).pptxWelcome to DataMetricks Consulting (1).pptx
Welcome to DataMetricks Consulting (1).pptx
 
Unveiling the Legacy of the Rosetta stone A Key to Ancient Knowledge.pptx
Unveiling the Legacy of the Rosetta stone A Key to Ancient Knowledge.pptxUnveiling the Legacy of the Rosetta stone A Key to Ancient Knowledge.pptx
Unveiling the Legacy of the Rosetta stone A Key to Ancient Knowledge.pptx
 
How consumers use technology and the impacts on their lives
How consumers use technology and the impacts on their livesHow consumers use technology and the impacts on their lives
How consumers use technology and the impacts on their lives
 
Social Media Marketing Portfolio - Maharsh Benday
Social Media Marketing Portfolio - Maharsh BendaySocial Media Marketing Portfolio - Maharsh Benday
Social Media Marketing Portfolio - Maharsh Benday
 
Martal Group - B2B Lead Gen Agency - Onboarding Overview
Martal Group - B2B Lead Gen Agency - Onboarding OverviewMartal Group - B2B Lead Gen Agency - Onboarding Overview
Martal Group - B2B Lead Gen Agency - Onboarding Overview
 
Social media, ppt. Features, characteristics
Social media, ppt. Features, characteristicsSocial media, ppt. Features, characteristics
Social media, ppt. Features, characteristics
 

2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Singapore

  • 1. Singapore Presentation | January 28 2016 Edelman Trust Barometer
  • 2. Informed Public ‣ 8 years in 20+ markets ‣ Represents 15% of total global population ‣ 500 respondents in U.S. and China; 200 in all other countries Must meet 4 criteria: ‣ Ages 25-64 ‣ College educated ‣ In top 25% of household income per age group in each country ‣ Report significant media consumption and engagement in business news General Online Population ‣ 5 years in 25+ markets ‣ Ages 18+ ‣ 1,150 respondents per country Methodology 28-country global data margin of error: General Population +/-0.6% (N=32,200), Informed Public +/- 1.2% (N=6,200), Mass Population +/- 0.6% (26,000). Country- specific data margin of error: General Population +/- 2.9 ( N=1,150), Informed Public +/- 6.9% (N = min 200, varies by country), China and U.S. +/- 4.4% (N=500), Mass Population +/- 3.0 to 3.6 (N =min 740, varies by country), half sample Global General Online Population +/- 0.8 (N=16,100). ‣ 16 years of data ‣ 33,000+ respondents total ‣ All fieldwork was conducted between October 13th and November 16th, 2015 Online Survey in 28 Countries Mass Population ‣ All population not including Informed Public ‣ Represents 85% of total global population 2
  • 3. Trust in Retrospect 3 Rising Influence of NGOs 2001 Business Must Partner with Government to Regain Trust 2009 Fall of the Celebrity CEO 2002 Earned Media More Credible Than Advertising 2003 U.S. Companies in Europe Suffer Trust Discount 2004 Trust Shifts from “Authorities” to Peers 2005 “A Person Like Me” Emerges as Credible Spokesperson 2006 Business More Trusted Than Government and Media 2007 Young Influencers Have More Trust in Business 2008 Trust is Now an Essential Line of Business 2010 Rise of Authority Figures 2011 Fall of Government 2012 Crisis of Leadership 2013 Business to Lead the Debate for Change 2014 Trust is Essential to Innovation 2015 Growing Inequality of Trust 2016
  • 4. 71 60 41 40 35 30 51 38 17 24 30 19 Trust Matters Source: 2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Q371-589. Thinking back over the past 12 months, have you taken any of the following actions in relation to companies that you trust? Please answer yes or no to each action. General Population, Singapore, question asked of half the sample. Q377-380. Still thinking about the past 12 months, have you taken any of the following actions in relation to companies that you do not trust? Please answer yes or no to each action. General Population, Singapore, question asked of half the sample. 4 Percent who engage in each behavior based on trust Behaviors for Distrusted Companies Behaviors for Trusted Companies Refused to buy products/services Criticized companies Shared negative opinions Disagreed with others Paid more than wanted Sold shares Chose to buy products/services Recommended them to a friend/colleague Shared positive opinions Online Defended company Paid more Bought shares most trusted content creators:#1 Friends and Family most trusted media source:#1 Search Engines General Population
  • 5. 1 State of Trust
  • 6. 55 Global 60 Global 82 China 78 India 74 UAE 72 Mexico 72 Singapore 70 Indonesia 64 U.S. 63 Australia 63 Canada 62 Netherlands 61 Colombia 84 UAE 79 India 78 Indonesia 75 China 65 Singapore 64 Netherlands 49 Ireland 47 Turkey 46 Sweden 42 Poland 42 Russia 41 Japan 48 Italy 48 S. Africa 47 Hong Kong 47 S. Korea 46 U.K. 45 Argentina 45 Poland 45 Russia 45 Spain 45 Sweden 40 Turkey 37 Ireland 37 Japan 58 Brazil 58 Italy 58 Malaysia 57 U.K. 55 France 54 S. Africa 53 Argentina 53 Spain 52 Hong Kong 51 Germany 50 S. Korea 59 Brazil 59 Mexico 56 Malaysia 53 Canada 52 Australia 52 France 52 U.S. 50 Germany Trust Index: Informed Public Drives Rebound Average trust in institutions, Informed Public, 2015 vs. 2016 2015 2016 Informed Public trust up 5 points Trusters from 22% in 2015 to 39% in 2016 Distrusters from 48% in 2015 to 21% in 2016 Trusters Neutrals Distrusters 6 The Trust Index is an average of a country’s trust in the institutions of government, business, media and NGOs. 27-country global total.
  • 7. 49 Ireland 47 Turkey 46 Sweden 42 Poland 42 Russia 41 Japan 49 Australia 49 Italy 49 U.S. 47 Hong Kong 46 Spain 45 S. Africa 42 Germany 42 S. Korea 42 U.K. 41 France 41 Ireland 41 Turkey 39 Russia 38 Japan 37 Sweden 35 Poland 73 China 66 UAE 65 India 64 Singapore 62 Indonesia 60 Mexico 82 China 78 India 74 UAE 72 Mexico 72 Singapore 70 Indonesia 64 U.S. 63 Australia 63 Canada 62 Netherlands 61 Colombia 56 Canada 55 Colombia 52 Netherlands 51 Argentina 51 Malaysia 50 Brazil58 Brazil 58 Italy 58 Malaysia 57 U.K. 55 France 54 S. Africa 53 Argentina 53 Spain 52 Hong Kong 51 Germany 50 S. Korea Trust Index: General Population Lags Average trust in institutions, Informed Public vs. General Population, 2016 Nearly 6 in 10 countries are distrusters among the General Population The Trust Index is an average of a country’s trust in the institutions of government, business, media and NGOs. 28-country global total. Informed Public General Population 60 Global 50 Global 7 Trusters Neutrals Distrusters
  • 8. 49 Australia 49 Italy 49 U.S. 47 Hong Kong 46 Spain 45 S. Africa 42 Germany 42 S. Korea 42 U.K. 41 France 41 Ireland 41 Turkey 39 Russia 38 Japan 37 Sweden 35 Poland 73 China 66 UAE 65 India 64 Singapore 62 Indonesia 60 Mexico 57 Mexico 55 Canada 55 Colombia 52 Netherlands 50 Argentina 50 Malaysia 48 Brazil 47 Australia 47 Italy 46 Hong Kong 45 U.S. 44 S. Africa 44 Spain 42 Germany 40 S. Korea 40 U.K. 39 France 39 Ireland 39 Russia 39 Turkey 38 Japan 36 Sweden 34 Poland 71 China 65 UAE 62 India 62 Indonesia 62 Singapore 56 Canada 55 Colombia 52 Netherlands 51 Argentina 51 Malaysia 50 Brazil Trust Index: Mass Population Left Behind Average trust in institutions, Informed Public vs. General Population vs. Mass Population For the mass population, 17 of 28 countries are distrusters The Trust Index is an average of a country’s trust in the institutions of government, business, media and NGOs. 28-country global total. General Population Mass Population 50 Global 48 Global 49 Ireland 47 Turkey 46 Sweden 42 Poland 42 Russia 41 Japan 82 China 78 India 74 UAE 72 Mexico 72 Singapore 70 Indonesia 64 U.S. 63 Australia 63 Canada 62 Netherlands 61 Colombia 58 Brazil 58 Italy 58 Malaysia 57 U.K. 55 France 54 S. Africa 53 Argentina 53 Spain 52 Hong Kong 51 Germany 50 S. Korea Informed Public 60 Global For the mass population, the global index falls into distruster territory 8 Trusters Neutrals Distrusters
  • 9. 50% Global Increase in Business Trust Source: 2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Q11-14. [TRACKING] [BUSINESS IN GENERAL] Below is a list of institutions. For each one, please indicate how much you trust that institution to do what is right using a nine-point scale where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal.“ (Top 4 Box, Trust) Informed Publics, 27-country global total. 9 Percent trust in business, Informed Public, 2015 vs. 2016 +12 +10 +11 +10 +15 +17 +13 +14 +16 +10 +13 -12 Increased or equal trust in 22 Countries Informed Public 57 84 72 70 73 64 60 61 53 48 52 47 45 43 46 48 41 38 45 45 42 36 84 85 67 66 49 63 87 84 80 75 75 70 68 68 65 60 60 59 59 55 52 51 51 47 46 43 37 81 80 73 67 62 46 Global India Mexico China Brazil S.Africa U.S. Singapore Italy Australia U.K. Canada France Spain Argentina Poland Turkey Ireland Germany Russia HongKong S.Korea Colombia Indonesia UAE Malaysia Netherlands Sweden 2015 2016 +12 +10 +11 +10 +15 +17 +13 +19 +16 +10 +13
  • 10. 45 64 55 48 52 54 51 45 41 42 39 41 41 34 31 30 33 28 18 70 68 62 50 46 45 39 42 38 47 73 60 58 55 55 54 53 50 49 47 45 43 42 39 38 36 31 23 55 63 63 59 47 45 44 38 38 34 Global China Singapore Mexico Canada Netherlands Brazil Argentina Italy Spain US SouthAfrica SouthKorea Australia Ireland Japan UK Sweden Turkey Colombia India Indonesia UAE HongKong Malaysia Germany France Russia Poland 50% Media Increases and Decreases Across APACMEA Source: 2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Q11-14. [MEDIA IN GENERAL] Below is a list of institutions. For each one, please indicate how much you trust that institution to do what is right using a nine-point scale where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal.“ (Top 4 Box, Trust) General Population, 27-country global total. 10 Percent trust in media, General Population, 2015 vs. 2016 General Population +5 Increased trust in 6 APACMEA countries 2015 2016 +9 +4 +2 +8 +8 -7 -5 -3 -3 -1 Decreased trust in 5 APACMEA countries
  • 11. 41 75 68 47 51 37 44 41 35 36 34 30 28 22 27 23 15 16 83 68 65 51 48 40 46 27 32 23 42 79 74 53 53 45 45 42 39 39 36 35 32 32 30 26 26 16 32 80 65 58 49 45 39 39 24 21 19 Global27 China Singapore Canada Russia Australia HongKong Turkey US Japan UK SouthKorea Mexico Ireland Italy Argentina Spain SouthAfrica Colombia UAE India Indonesia Netherlands Sweden Germany Malaysia France Brazil Poland 50% Trust in Government Remains Relatively High in Asia Source: 2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Q11-14. [GOVERNMENT IN GENERAL] Below is a list of institutions. For each one, please indicate how much you trust that institution to do what is right using a nine-point scale where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal.“ (Top 4 Box, Trust) General Population, 27-country global total. 11 Percent trust in government, General Population, 2015 vs. 2016 General Population Increased/equal government trust in 7 APACMEA countries +6 0 2015 2016 +4 +8 +1 +4 +5 -3 -3 -7 -7
  • 12. 50% 51 63 54 62 57 58 57 59 52 53 54 52 52 52 55 49 46 47 37 46 40 31 25 57 65 60 64 30 55 74 71 70 62 62 61 61 60 58 58 58 57 57 56 55 50 50 49 49 45 34 26 63 57 64 59 57 27 Global Mexico China Argentina Brazil Singapore Canada Malaysia Spain Italy SouthAfrica SouthKorea U.S. Australia France Turkey UK Poland Ireland Netherlands Germany Japan Sweden Colombia HongKong India UAE Indonesia Russia NGO Trust Remains High in APACMEA Source: 2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Q11-14. [NGOs IN GENERAL] Below is a list of institutions. For each one, please indicate how much you trust that institution to do what is right using a nine-point scale where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal.“ (Top 4 Box, Trust) General Population, 27-country global total. 12 Percent trust in NGOs, General Population, 2015 vs. 2016 General Population Increased or equal trust in NGOs in 8 of 11 APACMEA countries +2+17 0 2015 2016 +4 +4 +6 +5 +3 -1 -1 -7
  • 13. 64 75 76 71 76 56 60 64 58 62 73 82 75 70 76 71 72 73 68 74 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 66 77 71 61 68 59 60 60 57 60 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Source: 2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Q11-14. Below is a list of institutions. For each one, please indicate how much you trust that institution to do what is right using a nine-point scale, where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal.” (Top 4 Box, Trust) Informed Public and General Population, Singapore. 13 Percent trust in the four institutions of government, business, media and NGOs, 2012 vs. 2016 65 70 70 59 69 61 62 60 55 60 NGO’s Government Media Business Post-Recession Highs Informed Public General Population
  • 15. The Inversion of Influence 15 83% of Population 62 Trust Index 17% of Population 72 Trust Index Informed Public Mass Population Source: 2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Q11-14. Below is a list of institutions. For each one, please indicate how much you trust that institution to do what is right using a nine-point scale, where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal.” (Top 4 Box, Trust) Informed Public and Mass Population, Singapore Authority & Influence Influence Authority
  • 16. Influence The Inversion of Influence 16 Influence & Authority Authority Old Model ‣ Elites have access to more/better information ‣ Elites’ interests interconnected with those of mass ‣ Becoming an “elite” open to all New Reality ‣ Peer-to-peer influence more powerful than top- down ‣ Increasing distrust among mass population ‣ Mass movements based on dissatisfaction and urgency The Divide ‣ Democratization of information and more information ‣ High-profile revelations of greed and misbehavior ‣ Income inequality
  • 17. 53 58 56 56 60 44 47 46 46 48 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 A Significant Divide Across the Globe; Similar Trend in Singapore Source: 2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Q11-14. Below is a list of institutions. For each one, please indicate how much you trust that institution to do what is right using a nine-point scale, where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal.” (Top 4 Box, Trust) Informed Public and Mass Population, 25-country global total. GDP 5 = U.S., China, Japan, Germany, U.K. 17 Percent trust in the four institutions of government, business, media and NGOs, 2012 to 2016 Informed Public Mass Population 12pt Gap 9pt Gap in trust inequality-- which jumps to a 5-point increase among the GDP5 3-point increase
  • 18. A Global Phenomenon Source: 2016 Edelman Trust Barometer. The Trust Index is an average of a country’s trust in the institutions of government, business, media and NGOs, 28-country global total. 18 Trust Index, Informed Public vs. Mass Population, 15 countries with double-digit trust gaps in 2016 Country Informed Public Mass Population Gap U.S. 64 45 19 U.K. 57 40 17 France 55 39 16 India 78 62 16 Australia 63 47 16 Mexico 72 57 15 Italy 58 47 11 China 82 71 11 Brazil 58 48 10 Ireland 49 39 10 Netherlands 62 52 10 Sweden 46 36 10 S. Africa 54 44 10 S. Korea 50 40 10 Singapore 72 62 10
  • 19. Trust Index 2012 – 2016, percentage point change in the size of the trust gap between Informed Public and Mass Population An Accelerating Disparity Source: 2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Q11-14. Below is a list of institutions. For each one, please indicate how much you trust that institution to do what is right using a nine-point scale where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal.“ (Top 4 Box, Trust) Informed Public and Mass Population, 25-country global total, 2012 vs 2016. GDP 5 = U.S., China, Japan, Germany, U.K. 19 Increased Gap Decreased Gap Gap has increased in 16 of 25 countries Global25 GDP5 France U.K. U.S. Spain Mexico Singapore S.Korea Malaysia India China Brazil Germany Australia Ireland Russia Poland Canada Japan Indonesia Italy Argentina UAE HongKong Netherlands 2012 Gap 9 7 4 7 11 1 8 6 6 4 13 8 7 6 14 8 2 7 8 3 10 13 6 13 10 14 15 2016 Gap 12 12 16 17 19 9 15 10 10 8 16 11 10 9 16 10 3 8 8 3 8 11 3 9 6 10 10 Sweden 3 5 12 10 8 8 7 4 4 4 3 3 3 3 2 2 1 1 0 0 -2 -2 -3 -4 -4 -4 -5
  • 20. 50% 18 of 28 countries have a double-digit trust gap between high-income and low-income respondents Trust Index: A Link to Income Inequality Source: 2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Q13. Below is a list of institutions. For each one, please indicate how much you trust that institution to do what is right using a nine-point scale, where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal.” (Top 4 Box, Trust) General Population, 28-country global total, lower vs. upper quartile income in each country. [“CEOs are fairly paid relative to the rest of the workforce”] GDP 5 = U.S., China, Japan, Germany, U.K. 20 Average trust in institutions, respondents in top quartile of income vs. respondents in bottom quartile of income in each country, ranked by the size of the gap between them 60 57 71 64 78 78 68 49 52 62 67 49 45 46 50 53 40 74 79 46 65 68 59 38 44 80 55 62 58 71 46 42 40 35 52 56 48 30 33 45 50 32 31 32 37 40 27 62 69 36 56 59 51 30 37 73 48 55 52 66 Global GDP5 U.S. France Brazil India Netherlands Russia U.K. Italy Singapore Japan HongKong Turkey Sweden Spain Poland Colombia Mexico Ireland SouthAfrica UAE Argentina SouthKorea Germany Indonesia Australia Malaysia Canada China 19192022262931 Low-income respondents High-income respondents
  • 21. 50% 55 46 19 21 28 48 41 45 42 47 44 57 46 50 46 63 52 49 58 55 55 51 69 62 64 73 73 79 81 87 47 37 15 20 24 31 31 33 33 34 34 36 36 37 39 45 46 47 49 49 49 57 64 64 65 69 70 74 81 83 Global GDP5 Japan France Germany U.K. Australia Italy S.Korea Netherlands Sweden Poland HongKong Canada Russia U.S. Singapore Turkey Ireland S.Africa Spain Malaysia Mexico Argentina Brazil China UAE Indonesia Colombia India In 19 of 28 countries, less than half of Mass Population think they will be better off in five years Mass Population Less Optimistic Source: 2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Q445. Thinking about the economic prospects for yourself and your family, how do you think you and your family will be doing in five years' time? (Top 2 Box, ‘Much better off than today,’ and ‘Somewhat better off than today.’) Informed Public and Mass Population, 28-country global total. GDP 5 = U.S., China, Japan, Germany, U.K. 21 Percent of the Informed Public vs. Mass Population who believe they and their families will be better off in five years’ time Informed Public Mass Population 17 10 12 13 10 21 10 13 18
  • 22. 3 Leadership in a Divided World
  • 23. Actions Leadership in a Divided World:
  • 24. 50% 55% 60% 65% 70% 75% 80% 85% 90% Financial Services Rebounds Source: 2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Q45-429. Please indicate how much you trust businesses in each of the following industries to do what is right. Again, please use the same 9-point scale where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal”. (Top 4 Box, Trust) General Population, Singapore. *From 2012-2014, Pharma included as subsector(Q61f-65f). **From 2012-2015, Pharma included as an industry sector (Q43-60). 2012-2014 data recalibrated as a sector. Trust in each industry sector, 2012 - 2016 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Industry 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 5 yr. Trend Technology 81% 76% 82% 77% 76% 5 Telecommunications 76% 70% 77% 69% 71% 5 Energy 69% 67% 71% 69% 69% 0 Food & Beverage 77% 71% 75% 68% 68% 9 Consumer Packaged Goods 70% 67% 70% 67% 64% 6 Financial Service 64% 59% 66% 62% 64% 0 Automotive 68% 68% 76% 69% 63% 5 Pharmaceutical 76% 68% 72% 68% 62% 14 General Population 24 Global 2016 74% 60% 58% 64% 61% 51% 60% 53%
  • 25. 66 66 66 64 62 62 60 59 56 54 47 45 42 33 31 30 29 Canada Sweden Switzerland Germany Australia U.K. Japan Netherlands U.S. France Italy Spain SouthKorea China Brazil India Mexico Developed Markets More Trusted Source: 2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Q26-Q422. Now we would like to focus on global companies headquartered in specific countries. Please indicate how much you trust global companies headquartered in the following countries to do what is right. Use the same nine-point scale, where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal.” (Top 4 Box, Trust) General Population, 25-country global total. 25 Trust in companies headquartered in each country, and percentage point change, 2012 vs. 2016 +6 -2 +6 +8 -2+1+1n/a+1+4+5+3 +2 +2 +1 0 +3 4 Year Trend General Population
  • 26. 76 68 69 76 70 70 67 75 62 60 60 74 63 68 66 71 NGOs Business Media Government Business Most Trusted to Keep Pace Source: 2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Q11-14. Below is a list of institutions. For each one, please indicate how much you trust that institution to do what is right using a nine-point scale, where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal.” (Top 4 Box, Trust), Informed Public and General Population, 27-country global total. Q441-444 Below is a list of institutions. For each one, please indicate how much you trust that institution to keep up with the changing times using a 9-point scale where one means that you “do not trust them at all to keep up with change” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal to keep up with change”. (Top 4 Box, Trust) Informed Public and General Population, Singapore 26 Percent trust, and percent who trust each institution to keep up with the changing times, 2016 Informed Public General Population Trust Trusted to keep paceBusiness in the lead
  • 27. Business Must Lead to Solve Problems Source: 2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Q249. Please indicate how much you agree or disagree with the following statement? (Top 4 Box, Agree). General Population, Singapore, question asked of half the sample. . 81% agree “A company can take specific actions that both increase profits and improve the economic and social conditions in the community where it operates.” up from 75% in 2015 General Population 27
  • 28. Access to education/training Address income inequality Access to healthcare Protecting/improving the environment Reducing poverty Supporting human & civil rights Modern infrastructure E E P H Source: 2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Q561-573 Thinking about businesses in your country, how important is it that they play a role in solving each of the following societal issues? Please use a nine-point scale where one means that it is “not at all important” and nine means that it is “extremely important”. (Top 4 Box, Importance) General Population, 28-country global total, question asked of one quarter the sample. Societal Expectations Vary 28 Most important issue for business to address in each country Canada Brazil Germany France China U.S. Poland Argentina Sweden Mexico U.K. Ireland Netherlands Turkey Singapore Hong Kong Malaysia Colombia Japan Australia Russia S. Korea Italy Spain Indonesia UAE S. Africa India General Population R I I E E R H E E E E E P P E H P E H H H E E E E E P I H E I
  • 29. Integrity 48% 24% 24% Has Ethical Business Practices 50% 24% 26% Takes Responsible Actions To Address An Issue Or A Crisis 47% 25% 22% Has Transparent And Open Business Practices 46% 22% 24% Engagement 46% 23% 23% Treats Employees Well 45% 25% 20% Listens To Customer Needs And Feedback 49% 25% 24% Places Customers Ahead Of Profits 47% 22% 25% Communicates Frequently And Honestly On The State Of Its Business 43% 22% 21% Products 37% 24% 13% Offers High Quality Products Or Services 48% 25% 23% Is An Innovator Of New Products, Services Or Ideas 26% 22% 4% Purpose 33% 20% 13% Works To Protect And Improve The Environment 38% 22% 16% Creates Programs That Positively Impact The Local Community 32% 19% 13% Addresses Society's Needs In Its Everyday Business 34% 20% 14% Partners With NGOs, Government And Third Parties To Address Societal Issues 27% 17% 10% Operations 30% 22% 8% Has Highly-Regarded And Widely Admired Top Leadership 33% 22% 11% Ranks On A Global List Of Top Companies, Such As Best To Work For Or Most Admired 25% 22% 3% Delivers Consistent Financial Returns To Investors 31% 22% 9% Trust Building Source: 2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Q80-95 How important is each of the following attributes to building your TRUST in a company? Use a 9-point scale where one means that attribute is “not at all important to building your trust” and nine means it is “extremely important to building your trust” in a company. (Top 2 Box, Importance) Q114-129 Please rate businesses in general on how well you think they are performing on each of the following attributes. Use a 9- point scale where one means they are "performing extremely poorly" and nine means they are "performing extremely well". (Top 2 Box, Performance) Singapore. Company Importance vs. Performance % Importance % Performance Gap General Population 30
  • 30. Purpose Impacts Trust Percent who cite each as a reason for why their trust in business has increased or decreased Source: 2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Q328-329. For which of the following reasons, if any, has your trust in each institution listed below increased over the past year? Q330-331. For which of the following reasons, if any, has your trust in each institution listed below decreased over the past year? General Population, Singapore. Reasons Trust in Business Has Increased Reasons Trust in Business Has Decreased Produces economic growth Contributes to the greater good Helps me and my family live a fulfilling life Fails to contribute to the greater good Does not have good leadership Lacks economic growth 54% 43% 36% 45% 40% 38% General Population 31
  • 31. Role of the CEO Leadership in a Divided World:
  • 32. 58 55 50 47 43 46 46 39 38 58 57 54 53 50 48 43 43 39 Peers, Employees More Credible than Leaders Source: 2016 Edelman. Trust Barometer Q130-587. Below is a list of people. In general, when forming an opinion of a company, if you heard information about a company from each person, how credible would the information be—extremely credible, very credible, somewhat credible, or not credible at all? (Top 2 Box, Very/Extremely Credible) General Population, Singapore, question asked of half the sample. 33 Percent who rate each spokesperson as extremely/very credible 2015 2016 +7+6 Technical Expert Academic Expert A person like yourself Financial Industry Analyst EmployeeCEO NGO representative Board of Directors Government official/regul ator CEO credibility increased the most General Population
  • 33. CEO Focus Misplaced Source: 2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Q451-461. Thinking about CEOs, how strongly do you agree or disagree with the following statements? (Top 4 Box, Agree/Bot 5 Box, Disagree) General Population, Singapore. [‘CEOs do too much lobbying,’ ‘CEOs can be trust to create jobs,’ ‘Given that the average tenure of CEOs is just 4 years, CEOs aren’t in their role long enough to make a positive impact,’ ‘CEOs are too focused on short-term financial results,’] 34 Percent who agree with each statement about CEOs Too Much Focus on short-term financial results69% Lobbying51% Not Enough Job creation51% Positive long-term impact64% General Population
  • 34. Purpose and Profits Matter Source: 2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Q496-506. How visible do you think a CEO should personally be in these different types of business situations? Please use a 9-point scale where one means that it is “not visible at all” and nine means that it is “extremely visible”. (Top 4 Box, Visible) General Population, Singapore, question asked of half the sample. 35 Percent who agree that CEOs should be personally visible in discussing… 78% Societal Issues ‣ Income inequality ‣ Public policy discussions ‣ Personal views on societal issues 71% Financial Results General Population
  • 35. Integrity 42 19 23 Exhibits highly ethical behaviors 41 16 25 Takes responsible actions to address an issue or crisis 46 25 21 Behaves in a way that is transparent and open 40 15 25 Engagement 39 16 23 Treats employees well 42 17 25 Listens to customer needs and feedback 39 17 22 Places customer ahead of profits 40 14 26 Communicates frequently and honestly on the state of their company 36 16 20 Products 31 23 8 Places a premium on offering high quality products or services 32 23 9 Is focused on driving innovation and introducing new products/services/ideas 31 24 7 Purpose 29 18 11 Is dedicated to protecting and improving the environment 29 14 15 Ensures that the company creates programs that positively impact the local community in which it operates 31 20 11 Ensures that the company addresses society's needs in its everyday business 33 21 12 Ensures that the company partners with NGOs, government and third parties to address societal issues 23 18 5 Operations 27 21 6 Attracts and retains a highly-regarded and widely admired top leadership team 31 23 8 Is ranked on a global list of top CEOs, such as "The Best Performing CEOs in The World" 19 21 -2 Manages the company in a way that delivers consistent financial returns 32 19 13 Leaders Seen As Underperforming Source: 2016 Edelman Trust Barometer. Q462-478 How important is each of the following attributes to building your trust in CEOs? (Top 2 Box, Important) Q479-495 Please rate CEOs on how well you think they are performing on each of the following attributes. Use a 9-point scale where one means they are “performing extremely poorly” and nine means they are “performing extremely well.” CEO questions use the same scales as the business questions. (Top 2 Box, Performance) General Population, Singapore . Importance vs. performance of 16 trust-building leadership attributes % Importance % Performance Gap General Population 36
  • 36. Desired Leadership Qualities Characteristics that make a CEO trustworthy, percent who selected each as one of the top five in each region 37 cannot name any CEOs* 60% of global respondents North America Honest 59% Ethical 48% Competent 26% Transparent 26% Sincere 24% Latin America Ethical 47% Honest 44% Competent 36% Visionary 34% Innovative 33% Europe Honest 53% Competent 43% Experienced 28% Ethical 27% Transparent 27% APAC Honest 39% Visionary 35% Decisive 31% Ethical 31% Competent 26% General Population Source: 2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Q515. Which of the following personal characteristics make a CEO trustworthy? Please select the five most important characteristics that make a CEO trustworthy. General Population, 28-country global total, question asked of half the sample. * Source: 2016 Edelman Trust Barometer CEO Supplement Q1. Thinking about company CEOs in general, how many CEOs could you name in full? General Population, 10-country global total.
  • 37. 66% 76%79% 85% Their education and how it shaped them Their personal success story The obstacles they have overcome Their personal values Personal Values and History Matter Source: 2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Q507-514. Thinking about how a CEO communicates with a variety of groups and individuals, how important are each of the following activities a CEO could engage in? Please use a 9-point scale where one means that attribute is “not at all important to building your trust” and nine means it is “extremely important to building your trust”. [Media Engagement net = Q507 ‘Interviews with the media,’ and ‘Q512 ‘Sharing their views on a blog or on social media.’ Direct Engagement net = Q508 ‘Communications with employees,’ and ‘Participation in industry conferences.’] Q516-524. For you to trust a CEO, how important is it that you have information on each of the following aspects of the CEO’s personal life outside of their business? Please use a 9-point scale where one means that attribute is “not at all important to building your trust” and nine means it is “extremely important to building your trust. (Top 4 Box, Important) General Population, Singapore, question asked of half the sample. Percent who agree that each type of information is important in building trust in a CEO General Population 38
  • 39. 32 33 21 32 27 42 32 34 27 33 47 3332 24 48 19 19 26 19 15 22 24 19 15 12 15 10 19 20 17 8 9 9 9 8 10 Employees are Essential Advocates Source: 2016 Edelman Trust Q610 Who do you trust MOST to provide you with credible and honest information about a company's financial earnings and operational performance, and top leadership’s accomplishments? Q611 A company’s business practices and handling of a crisis: Who do you trust MOST to provide you with credible and honest information about a company’s business practices, both positive and negative, and its handling of a crisis? Q612 Who do you trust MOST to provide you with credible and honest information about a company’s employee programs, benefits and working conditions, and how a company serves its customers and prioritizes customer needs ahead of company profits? Q613 Who do you trust MOST to provide you with credible and honest information about a company’s partnerships with NGOs and effort to address societal issues, including those to positively impact the local community? Q614 Who do you trust MOST to provide you with credible and honest information about a company’s innovation efforts and new product development? Q615 Who do you trust MOST to provide you with credible and honest information about a company’s stand on issues related to the industry in which it operates? General Population, Singapore, question asked of half the sample. 40 Most trusted spokesperson to communicate each topic Innovation effortsFinancial earnings & operational performance Business practices/ crisis handling Treatment of employees/customer Partnerships/ Programs to address societal issues Views on industry issues General Population Company CEO Senior executive Employee Activist consumer Academic Media spokesperson
  • 40. Company NOT engaged in societal issues Company engaged in societal issues Employee Advocacy Increases With Societal Issue Engagement 41 Percent who agree with each statement, comparing those who work at companies/for CEOs involved in addressing broader societal issues vs. those who do not 61 60 55 60 64 64 75 Motivated to perform Stay working for the company Recommend company as an employer Confidence in the future of the company Committed to achieving our strategy Recommend products and services to others Do the best possible job for the customer Impact of Company Engagement 17 25 25 28 32 25 20 92 89 89 88 87 85 81 General Population Source: 2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Q527-529. Does your company and your company’s CEO get involved in addressing broader societal issues beyond the core business, through programs or relationships with other companies? Q530-536. Thinking about your current company, please indicate how much you agree with each of the following statements using a 9-point scale where one means that you “strongly disagree” and nine means that you “strongly agree”. (Top 4 Box, Agree) General Population, Singapore, question asked of half the sample.
  • 42. Transformed Media Landscape Source: 2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Q178-182. When looking for general news and information, how much would you trust each type of source for general news and information? Please use a nine-point scale where one means that you “do not trust it at all” and nine means that you “trust it a great deal.” (Top 4 Box, Trust) General Population and Millennials, Singapore, question asked of half the sample. Trust in each source for general news and information *From 2012-2015, we included Online Search Engines as a media type. In 2016, we changed to Search Engines. **From 2012-2015, we included Hybrid as a media type. In 2016, we changed this over to Online-Only. General Population 63 55 45 64 45 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Industry 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Millenials Gap Search engines* 67 62 62 63 64 69% 5 Traditional media 75 68 70 62 63 65% 2 Online-only media** 58 50 53 48 55 61% 6 Owned media 49 45 48 43 45 49% 4 Social media 55 45 46 47 45 47% 2
  • 43. Influence and Frequency of Media Sources Source: 2016 Edelman Trust Barometer - How often do you read, view, click on or engage with the following types of content, media or information sources? Online search engines, such as Google… (Q285), Television news and information (Q287), Social networking sites, such as Facebook, LinkedIn, Instagram, Twitter, etc.(Net of Q278 Social Networking, Q279 Blogs, Q289 Online message boards, forums or newsgroups), articles in printed newspapers (Q284), articles in printed magazines(Q283), Blogs (Q279) (Several times a week+) General Population, Singapore, question asked of half the sample. 44 Percent who use each media source several times a week or more General Population Top 2 most-used sources of news and information are peer- influenced media 70 69 65 55 31 24 Social Search TV Newspapers Magazines Blogs
  • 44. 65 55 53 43 42 45 48 41 31 25 77 64 64 59 55 53 52 48 37 33 My friends and family An academic expert Companies that I use A company CEO Elected officials Employees of a company A journalist A well-known online personality Celebrities Companies [brands] I don’t use Every Voice Matters Source: 2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Q598-609. Thinking about the information you consume, how much do you trust the information from each of the following authors or content creators? (Top 4 Box, Trust) General Population, Singapore, question asked of half the sample. * Asked as “Brands I don’t use” in 2015. 45 Percent who trust information created by each author on social networking sites, content sharing sites and online-only information sources, 2015 vs. 2016 2015 2016 +12 General Population +13+16 50%
  • 45. Actions Values and Role Employee Advocacy Earned Engagement Embracing the New Reality of Influence to Address Trust Inequality ‣ Create societal impact in addition to profits through purposeful action ‣ Express your values through honest, ethical engagement in which you share your story ‣ Ignite your most powerful advocate, your employees ‣ Engage cross channel to meet stakeholders, where they are, about what most interests/concerns them Influence TRUST 46 Leadership TRUST