SlideShare une entreprise Scribd logo
1  sur  33
Télécharger pour lire hors ligne
2018 Edelman
Trust Barometer
February 7th, 2018
Hong Kong
2
Methodology
2018 Edelman
Trust Barometer
Online Survey in 28 Markets
18 years of data
33,000+ respondents total
All fieldwork was conducted between
October 28 and November 20, 2017
APAC regional definition:
Australia, China, Hong Kong, India, Indonesia,
Japan, Malaysia, Singapore, S. Korea
General Online Population
7 years in 25+ markets
Ages 18+
1,150 respondents per market
All slides show general online
population data unless otherwise noted
Mass Population
All population not including informed public
Represents 85% of total global population
Informed Public
10 years in 20+ markets
Represents 15% of total global
population
500 respondents in U.S. and China;
200 in all other markets
Must meet 4 criteria:
Ages 25-64
College educated
In top 25% of household income per
age group in each market
Report significant media consumption
and engagement in business news
28-market global data margin of error: General population +/-
0.6% (N=32,200), informed public +/- 1.2% (N=6,200), mass
population +/- 0.6% (26,000+), half-sample global general online
population +/- 0.8 (N=16,100).
Market-specific data margin of error: General population +/- 2.9
(N=1,150), informed public +/- 6.9% (N = min 200, varies by
market), China and U.S. +/- 4.4% (N=500), mass population +/-
3.0 to 3.6 (N =min 740, varies by market).
Trust in Retrospect
3
Rising Influence
of NGOs
2001
Business Must
Partner with
Government to
Regain Trust
2009
Fall of the
Celebrity CEO
2002
Earned Media
More Credible
Than
Advertising
2003
U.S.
Companies in
Europe Suffer
Trust Discount
2004
Trust
Shifts from
“Authorities”
to Peers
2005
“A Person Like
Me” Emerges
as Credible
Spokesperson
2006
Business More
Trusted Than
Government
and Media
2007
Young
Influencers
Have More Trust
in Business
2008
Trust is Now an
Essential Line
of Business
2010
Rise of
Authority
Figures
2011
Fall of
Government
2012
Crisis of
Leadership
2013
Business
to Lead
the Debate
for Change
2014
Trust is
Essential to
Innovation
2015
Growing
Inequality
of Trust
2016
Trust in Crisis
2017
The Battle
for Truth
2018
Source: 2018 Edelman Trust Barometer.
The Trust Index is an average of a market’s trust in the institutions
of government, business, media and NGOs. General population,
28-market global total.
4
Average trust in institutions,
general population, 2017 vs. 2018
Trust Index
A World
of Distrust
Biggest changes in
47 Global
72 India
69 Indonesia
67 China
60 Singapore
60 UAE
53 The Netherlands
52 Mexico
52 U.S.
50 Colombia
49 Canada
48 Brazil
48 Italy
48 Malaysia
45 Argentina
44 Hong Kong
44 Spain
43 Turkey
42 Australia
42 S. Africa
41 Germany
40 France
40 U.K.
38 S. Korea
37 Sweden
36 Ireland
35 Japan
35 Poland
34 Russia
U.S. -9
China +7
S. Korea +6
UAE +6
Italy -5
Trust
(60-100)
Neutral
(50-59)
Distrust
(1-49)
Trust decline in the U.S. is
the steepest ever measured
48 Global
74 China
71 Indonesia
68 India
66 UAE
58 Singapore
54 Mexico
54 The Netherlands
53 Malaysia
49 Canada
47 Argentina
47 Colombia
47 Spain
46 Turkey
45 Hong Kong
44 Brazil
44 S. Korea
43 Italy
43 U.S.
41 Germany
41 Sweden
40 Australia
40 France
39 Poland
39 U.K.
38 Ireland
38 S. Africa
37 Japan
36 Russia
2017
General Population
2018
General Population
Global Trust Index remains at distruster level
20 of 28 Markets are distrusters, up 1 from 2017
59 Global
83 China
81 Indonesia
77 India
76 UAE
70 Singapore
67 The Netherlands
65 Malaysia
65 Mexico
62 Canada
60 Argentina
57 Italy
57 Turkey
56 France
56 Sweden
55 Australia
55 Spain
54 Germany
52 U.K.
51 Brazil
50 Colombia
50 S. Korea
49 Hong Kong
48 Ireland
48 Poland
47 Russia
46 Japan
45 S. Africa
45 U.S.
60 Global
80 India
79 China
78 Indonesia
77 UAE
71 Singapore
68 U.S.
62 Canada
62 The Netherlands
61 Italy
61 Mexico
57 Malaysia
57 Spain
56 France
56 U.K.
55 Colombia
54 Australia
54 Germany
53 Hong Kong
51 Argentina
51 Brazil
50 S. Korea
50 Turkey
49 Japan
49 S. Africa
47 Sweden
45 Russia
44 Ireland
43 Poland
Source: 2018 Edelman Trust Barometer.
The Trust Index is an average of a market’s trust in the institutions
of government, business, media and NGOs. Informed public, 28-
market global total.
5
Average trust in institutions,
informed public, 2017 vs. 2018
Trust Index
Informed Public
Declines to Neutral
2017
Informed Public
2018
Informed Public
Biggest changes in
U.S. -23
Argentina +9
Sweden +9
Malaysia +8
Turkey +7
U.S. Trust Index crashes
23 points
A 1-point decline in the Global Trust Index
Trust
(60-100)
Neutral
(50-59)
Distrust
(1-49)
58 58
47 4749 48
33
42
73 74
63 64
51 54
33
42
Source: 2018 Edelman Trust Barometer. TRU_INS. Below is a list of institutions. For each one, please indicate how much you trust that institution to do what is right using
a nine-point scale, where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal.” (Top 4 Box, Trust) Informed Public and General
Population, U.S. The Trust Index is an average of a location's trust in the institutions of government, business, media and NGOs. Informed Public and General Population,
U.S.
6
Trust Crash in U.S.
Business MediaNGOs Government
-9 -10 -14 -5
-22 -20 -30 -22
20182017
43TRUST
INDEX
45
TRUST
INDEX
9-point decrease
Fell from 8th to 18th place
General Population
23-point decrease
Fell from 6th to last place
Informed Public
Y-to-Y Change− +0
Percent trust in each institution, and change from 2017 to 2018
Source: 2018 Edelman Trust Barometer. TRU_INS. Below is a list of institutions. For each one, please indicate how much you trust that institution to do what is
right using a nine-point scale, where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal.” (Top 4 Box, Trust) S11. For
whom did you vote for in the last Presidential election? General population, U.S., among Trump (n=373) and Clinton (n=502) voters.
7
Percent trust in each institution, Trump vs. Clinton voters
U.S. Trust in Media Diverges Along Voting Lines
47
57
35
27
54
47
35
61
Business MediaNGOs Government
difference in
trust in the media
34pt
Trump
Voters
Clinton
Voters
22-point
decline since
the election
8
Government Most Broken
in the U.S.
Which institution is the
most broken?
Source: 2018 Edelman Trust Barometer. ATT_STE. Please indicate which institution – Government, Media, Business or NGO’s – is best described by each of the
following statements? General population, U.S. and China.
Government
38%
Business
59%
Government
NGOs
✓
✓
Government Path
to Better Future in China
Which institution is most likely
to lead to a better future?
68%
%
%
% %
%
%
29%
43
14
18
24 25 27 28
33 33 34 35 35 36 37
41 43 44 45 46 46 46 46
51
54
65
70
73
77
84
Global28
S.Africa
Brazil
Colombia
Poland
Italy
Mexico
France
U.S.
Spain
Australia
Ireland
U.K.
Japan
Argentina
Germany
Russia
S.Korea
Canada
HongKong
Malaysia
Sweden
Turkey
The
Netherlands
Singapore
India
Indonesia
UAE
China
Source: 2018 Edelman Trust Barometer. TRU_INS. [GOVERNMENT IN GENERAL] Below is a list of institutions. For each one, please indicate how much you trust that institution
to do what is right using a nine-point scale where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal.“ (Top 4 Box, Trust) General
Population, 28-market global total.
9
Trust in Government
Increases in 16 of 28 Markets
Percent trust in government, and change from 2017 to 2018
l llllllllllllllllllllllllllll+2 -1 -6 -8 +5 -4 +4 +8 -14 +9 -2 +3 0 0 +8 +5 0 +17 +3 +6 +9 +1 0 +3 -4 -5 +2 +2 +8
Distrusted in 21 Markets
TrustNeutralDistrust
Y-to-Y Change− +0
In Search
of Truth
43
30 31 32 32 32 33 33 34 35 35
39 40 42 42 43 43 43 44 45 47 48 49
52
55 56
61
68
71
Global28
Turkey
Australia
Japan
Sweden
U.K.
France
Ireland
Poland
Russia
S.Africa
Argentina
S.Korea
Germany
U.S.
Brazil
Colombia
HongKong
Spain
Italy
Malaysia
Mexico
Canada
Singapore
TheNetherlands
UAE
India
Indonesia
China
Source: 2018 Edelman Trust Barometer. TRU_INS. [MEDIA IN GENERAL] Below is a list of institutions. For each one, please indicate how much you trust
that institution to do what is right using a nine-point scale where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great
deal.“ (Top 4 Box, Trust) General population, 28-market global total.
11
Percent trust in media, and change from 2017 to 2018
Media Least Trusted Institution Globally
TrustNeutralDistrust
Distrusted in 22 of 28 of markets
l llllllllllllllllllllllllllll0 +5 -1 0 -1 0 0 +4 +3 +4 -4 -1 0 0 -5 -5 -2 +1 0 -3 +5 +1 +4 -2 +1 +12 -5 +1 +6
Y-to-Y Change− +0
Source: 2018 Edelman Trust Barometer. ATT_MED_AGR. Below is a list of statements. For each one, please rate how much you agree or disagree with that statement
using a nine-point scale where one means “strongly disagree” and nine means “strongly agree”. (Top 4 Box, Agree), question asked of half of the sample. General
population; 28-market global total.
12
Percent who worry about false
information or fake news
being used as a weapon
World Worried About
Fake News as a Weapon
worry about false
information or fake news
being used as a weapon,
globally
7 in 10
Nearly
61-65 66-70 71-75 76-80
Japan Australia
Hong Kong
Singapore
S. Africa
UAE
China
India
Malaysia
S. Korea
Indonesia
APACMEA
% Trust in
Platforms 51 40 33 33 47 43 35 40 36 53 54 42 68 54 46 53 49 37 47 48 51 73 62 71 62 64 58 68 55
Global28
Germany
Ireland
Sweden
TheNetherlands
Canada
Australia
France
U.K.
Italy
Singapore
U.S.
China
Argentina
S.Africa
Spain
HongKong
Japan
Russia
S.Korea
Poland
India
Colombia
Indonesia
UAE
Brazil
Malaysia
Mexico
Turkey
% Trust in
Journalism 59 61 53 52 66 61 52 57 53 67 66 53 77 62 54 61 55 41 51 52 54 74 62 71 62 63 57 65 42
 
c cccccccccccccccccccccccccccc
Source: 2018 Edelman Trust Barometer. COM_MCL. When looking for general news and information, how much would you trust each type of source for general news and
information? Please use a nine-point scale where one means that you “do not trust it at all” and nine means that you “trust it a great deal.” (Top 4 Box, Trust), question
asked of half of the sample. General population, 28-market global total.
Journalism is an average of traditional media and online-only media. Platforms is an average of search engines and social media.
13
Gap in trust in journalism vs. platforms
Journalism More Trusted Than
Platforms in 21 Markets
Journalism More Trusted
Platforms
More Trusted
8
21 20 19 19 18 17 17 17 14 12 11 9 8 8 8 6 4 4 4 3 1 0 0 0
-1 -1 -3
-13
Gap
Average trust in search engines
and social media platforms
Average trust in traditional
and online-only media
Hong Kong
Source: 2018 Edelman Trust Barometer. TRU_INS. Below is a list of institutions. For each one, please indicate how much you trust that institution to do
what is right using a nine-point scale, where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal.” (Top 4 Box,
Trust) Informed Public and General Population, Hong Kong.
15
Percent trust in each institution, and change from 2017 to 2018, in Hong Kong
Distrust Convergence
20182017
Y-to-Y Change− +0
70
43
53
44
65
45 46
39
-5 -5+2 -7
Informed
Public
59
40 42
34
55
46
43
36
BusinessMediaNGOs Government
-4 +2+1+6
General
Population
NGOs Media BusinessGovernment
16
The Honeymoon Period
Joko Widodo
October ‘14
49%
65%
2014 2015
Moon Jae-in
May ‘17
Malcolm Turnbull
September ‘15
37%
45%
2015 2016 Emmanuel Macron
May ‘17
25%
33%
2017 2018
28%
45%
2017 2018
Sergio Mattarella
February ‘15
15%
26%
2015 2016
Narendra Modi
May ‘14
51%
68%
2014 2015
17
Government Most Broken
in Hong Kong
Which institution is the
most broken?
Source: 2018 Edelman Trust Barometer. ATT_STE. Please indicate which institution – Government, Media, Business or NGO’s – is best described by each of the
following statements? General population, 28-market global total and Hong Kong.
Business
NGOs
Government Government
Media Media
✓
Government Path to Better
Future
Which institution is most likely
to lead to a better future?
NGOs
Business23%
19%
30%
6% 8%
28%
18%
13%31%
42%
Hong KongGlobal
✓
Media
Source: 2018 Edelman Trust Barometer. TRU_INS. Below is a list of institutions. For each one, please indicate how much you trust that institution to do what is right using a nine-point scale, where one
means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal.” (Top 4 Box, Trust) Informed Public and General Population, Hong Kong.
19
Trust in Media
54
55 55
50
47
42
43
65
68
63
41
53 53
46
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
General
Informed
6 yr. Trend
Informed -19
General -11
Media Trend
Traditional Media on the Rise
Source: 2018 Edelman Trust Barometer. COM_MCL. When looking for general news and information, how much would you trust each type of source for general news and information? Please use a nine-
point scale where one means that you “do not trust it at all” and nine means that you “trust it a great deal.” (Top 4 Box, Trust). CRE_PPL. Below is a list of people. In general, when forming an opinion of a
company, if you heard information about a company from each person, how credible would the information be—extremely credible, very credible, somewhat credible, or not credible at all? (Top 2 Box,
Very/Extremely Credible). Both questions asked of half of the sample. General population, Hong Kong.
Journalism is an average of traditional media and online-only media.
Percent trust in each source for general news and information
20
Journalism
+755
59
41 41
36
63
55
47
43
34
Traditional Media Online Search Engines Online-Only Media Social Media Owned Media
-4+8 +2+6 -2
20182017
Y-to-Y Change− +0
Journalists a
credible source
+8
Source: 2018 Edelman Trust Barometer. News Engagement Scale, built from MED_SEG_OFT. How often do you engage in the following activities related to news and information? Indicate your
answer using the 7-point scale below. For details on how the News Engagement Scale was built, please refer to the Technical Appendix. ATT_MED_AGR. Below is a list of statements. For each
one, please rate how much you agree or disagree with that statement using a nine-point scale where one means “strongly disagree” and nine means “strongly agree”. (Top 4 Box, Agree), question
asked of half of the sample. General population, Hong Kong.
21
Fake news is leading to skepticism and confusion
But High Disengagement Reveals Concerns
58%
The average person
does not know how to
tell good journalism
from rumor or
falsehoods
64%
It is becoming harder
to tell if a piece of
news was produced
by a respected media
organization
67%
Worry about false
information or fake
news being used as a
weapon
40%
Are disengaged with
news – consume news
less than weekly
Disengaged Fake News Good vs. Bad Source
Source: 2018 Edelman Trust Barometer. ATT_MED_AGR. Below is a list of statements. For each one, please rate how much you agree or disagree with that statement using a nine-point
scale where one means “strongly disagree” and nine means “strongly agree”. (Top 4 Box, Agree), question asked of half of the sample. General population, Hong Kong.
22
News Organizations’ Priorities Under
the Spotlight
65%
are more concerned
with attracting a big
audience than reporting
Attracting
Large Audiences
62%
support an ideology vs.
informing the public
Politics
64%
sacrifice accuracy to be
the first to break a story
Breaking News
61%
feel advertisers have too
much influence on what
news the public gets to
see
Advertiser
Influence
Source: 2018 Edelman Trust Barometer. News Engagement Scale, built from MED_SEG_OFT. How often do you engage in the following activities related
to news and information? Indicate your answer using the 7-point scale below. General population, Hong Kong. For details on how the News Engagement
Scale was built, please refer to the Technical Appendix.
Source: Warc 2017 Media Consumption Overview: Hong Kong
23
Declining Trust In Media Does Not Equate To Declining Influence
25 25
31
29
Consumers Amplifiers
Global Hong Kong
Consume news
about weekly
or more
Consume news about
weekly or more AND
share or post content several
times a month or more
Hong Kong Media Consumption
Daily hours and minutes
2016 2017
Print press 0:37 0:42
Online press 0:47 0:58
Broadcast radio 0:43 0:47
Linear TV 1:38 1:49
Social media 1:39 2:01
Business
Source: Edelman Trust Barometer. TRU_INS. Below is a list of institutions. For each one, please indicate how much you trust that institution to do what is right using a nine-point scale, where one means
that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal.” (Top 4 Box, Trust). TRU_NAT. Now we would like to focus on global companies headquartered in specific countries.
Please indicate how much you trust global companies headquartered in the following countries to do what is right. Use the same 9-point scale where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and
nine means that you “trust them a great deal”. (Top 4 Box, Trust) Informed Public and General Population, Hong Kong.
25
Gap between general and informed is narrowing
Trust in Business
42
43
41
38
39
34
36
47
60
49
42
43
44
39
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
General
Informed
Company’s Headquarters Impacts
Trust in Hong Kong
15% 27%
Source: 2018 Edelman Trust Barometer. TRU_IND. Please indicate how much you trust businesses in each of the following industries to do what is
right. Again, please use the same 9-point scale where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal”.
(Top 4 Box, Trust), industries shown to half of the sample. General Population, Hong Kong.
26
Percent who trust each sector, and change from 2017 to 2018, in
Hong Kong
Trust Declines in 14 of 15 Sectors
47
47
51
51
56
59
59
60
61
63
68
71
72
72
75
Entertainment
Financial services
Automotive
Consumer packaged goods
Food and beverage
Energy
Telecommunications
Retail
Fashion
Manufacturing
Technology
Health care
Education
Transportation
Professional services
-10
-6
-6
-6
-8
TrustNeutralDistrust
Y-to-Y Change− +0
Industry 5 yr. Trend
Technology -11
Energy -9
Telecommunications -10
Food and beverage -14
Automotive -23
Consumer packaged goods -17
Entertainment -17
Financial services -15
-1
-2
+2
-1
-8
-8
-10
-14
-8
-10
Implications for Business
Source: 2018 Edelman Trust Barometer. CEO_AGR. Thinking about CEOs, how strongly do you agree or disagree with the following statements? (Top 4
Box, Agree), question asked of half of the sample. General population, Hong Kong.
28
Business Expected To Drive Change
67%
Agree that CEOs should
take the lead on change
rather than waiting for
government to impose it
50%
Believe companies who
only think about
themselves and their
profits are bound to fail
58 58
51 51
46
41 40 40 39
36 35
Apersonlike
yourself
Technicalexpert
Academic
expert
NGO
representative
Successful
entrepreneur
Employee
CEO
Journalist
Government
official/regulator
Boardof
directors
Financial
industryanalyst
Source: 2018 Edelman Trust Barometer. CRE_PPL. Below is a list of people. In general, when forming an opinion of a company, if you heard information
about a company from each person, how credible would the information be—extremely credible, very credible, somewhat credible, or not credible at all?
(Top 2 Box, Very/Extremely Credible), question asked of half of the sample. General population, Hong Kong.
29
Percent who rate each spokesperson as very/extremely credible,
and change from 2017 to 2018, in Hong Kong
Voices of Authority Regain Credibility
+2 +7 -1 +3 +6 -1 +13 +8 +10 +8 +9
− Y-to-Y Change+0
Opportunities for CEOs to Lead
Source: 2018 Edelman Trust Barometer. CEO_EXP. Below is a list of potential expectations that you might have for a company CEO. Thinking about CEOs in general, whether
they are global CEOs or a CEO who oversees a particular market, how would you characterize each using the following three-point scale? (Most important responsibility, code 3),
question asked of half of the sample. CEO_AGR. Thinking about CEOs, how strongly do you agree or disagree with the following statements? (Top 4 Box, Agree), question
asked of half of the sample. General population; Hong Kong
30
Percent who say each is one of the most
important expectations they have for a CEO in Hong Kong
46
49
51
52
58
64
65
65
74
Ensure gender equality in worker pay
Ensure company's workforce is inclusive/diverse
Set high ethical standards
Communicate regularly with employees
Be a leading voice in matters related to their industry
Ensure business decisions reflect the values of the company
Increase company's profits/stock price
Ensure company produces high quality products/services
Ensure company is trusted
Have no respect for
CEOs who remain
silent on important
issues
50%
31
People Define
“Media” As
Both Publishers
and Platforms:
Multichannel
Engagement
What did you assume was meant by
the phrase “media in general”?
Source: 2018 Edelman Trust Barometer. TRU_MED. In the above
question, what did you assume was meant by the phrase “media
in general”? General population, Hong Kong. Social is a net of
TRU_MEDr3 and r12, Influencers is r5, Search is r7, Brands is a
net of r10 and r11, Journalists is a net of r1 and r6, News Apps is
r8.
PLATFORMS
PUBLISHERS
29%64%
SearchSocial
60%
News
Apps
32%
Influencers
90%
Journalists
48%
Brands
32
Conclusions For Businesses
Increasing loss of
trust in business
Increasing expectation to
address social issues
Increasing confusion about what
information can be trusted
Companies must
build social impact
into their business
models
Redefine what you think of as media
and use it to own a clearer story
Use voices of authority and
take a stance on social issues
+
1
2
3
Thank You

Contenu connexe

Tendances

2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Global Report
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Global Report2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Global Report
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Global ReportJesper Andersen
 
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Australia
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Australia2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Australia
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - AustraliaEdelman APACMEA
 
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Malaysia Report
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Malaysia Report2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Malaysia Report
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Malaysia ReportEdelman
 
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer: Attitudes Toward Energy in a Polarized World
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer: Attitudes Toward Energy in a Polarized World 2018 Edelman Trust Barometer: Attitudes Toward Energy in a Polarized World
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer: Attitudes Toward Energy in a Polarized World Edelman
 
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Trust and the U.S. Presidential Election
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Trust and the U.S. Presidential Election2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Trust and the U.S. Presidential Election
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Trust and the U.S. Presidential ElectionEdelman
 
Edelman Trust Barometer 2016 - UK Energy Sector Results
Edelman Trust Barometer 2016 - UK Energy Sector ResultsEdelman Trust Barometer 2016 - UK Energy Sector Results
Edelman Trust Barometer 2016 - UK Energy Sector ResultsEdelman_UK
 
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer - Trust and the CEO
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer - Trust and the CEO2016 Edelman Trust Barometer - Trust and the CEO
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer - Trust and the CEOEdelman
 
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Korea
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Korea2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Korea
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer KoreaEdelman APACMEA
 
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Japan
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Japan2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Japan
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - JapanEdelman Japan
 
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - India
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - India2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - India
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - IndiaEdelman APACMEA
 
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Singapore
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Singapore2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Singapore
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - SingaporeEdelman APACMEA
 
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Japan
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Japan2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Japan
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - JapanEdelman Japan
 
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Malaysia
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Malaysia2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Malaysia
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - MalaysiaEdelman APACMEA
 
Edelman Trust Barometer 2007
Edelman Trust Barometer 2007Edelman Trust Barometer 2007
Edelman Trust Barometer 2007edelman.milan
 
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer Special Report: Family Business
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer Special Report: Family Business2017 Edelman Trust Barometer Special Report: Family Business
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer Special Report: Family BusinessEdelman
 
Energy - Edelman Trust Barometer 2014, UK Data
Energy - Edelman Trust Barometer 2014, UK DataEnergy - Edelman Trust Barometer 2014, UK Data
Energy - Edelman Trust Barometer 2014, UK DataEdelman_UK
 
2011 Australian Edelman Trust Barometer
2011 Australian Edelman Trust Barometer2011 Australian Edelman Trust Barometer
2011 Australian Edelman Trust BarometerMatthew Gain
 
2017 Edelman Ireland Trust Barometer
2017 Edelman Ireland Trust Barometer 2017 Edelman Ireland Trust Barometer
2017 Edelman Ireland Trust Barometer Edelman
 
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - South Africa
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - South Africa2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - South Africa
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - South AfricaEdelman APACMEA
 

Tendances (20)

2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Global Report
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Global Report2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Global Report
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Global Report
 
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Australia
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Australia2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Australia
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Australia
 
Edelman Trust Barometer 2018
Edelman Trust Barometer 2018Edelman Trust Barometer 2018
Edelman Trust Barometer 2018
 
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Malaysia Report
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Malaysia Report2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Malaysia Report
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Malaysia Report
 
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer: Attitudes Toward Energy in a Polarized World
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer: Attitudes Toward Energy in a Polarized World 2018 Edelman Trust Barometer: Attitudes Toward Energy in a Polarized World
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer: Attitudes Toward Energy in a Polarized World
 
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Trust and the U.S. Presidential Election
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Trust and the U.S. Presidential Election2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Trust and the U.S. Presidential Election
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Trust and the U.S. Presidential Election
 
Edelman Trust Barometer 2016 - UK Energy Sector Results
Edelman Trust Barometer 2016 - UK Energy Sector ResultsEdelman Trust Barometer 2016 - UK Energy Sector Results
Edelman Trust Barometer 2016 - UK Energy Sector Results
 
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer - Trust and the CEO
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer - Trust and the CEO2016 Edelman Trust Barometer - Trust and the CEO
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer - Trust and the CEO
 
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Korea
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Korea2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Korea
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Korea
 
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Japan
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Japan2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Japan
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Japan
 
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - India
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - India2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - India
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - India
 
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Singapore
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Singapore2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Singapore
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Singapore
 
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Japan
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Japan2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Japan
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Japan
 
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Malaysia
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Malaysia2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Malaysia
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Malaysia
 
Edelman Trust Barometer 2007
Edelman Trust Barometer 2007Edelman Trust Barometer 2007
Edelman Trust Barometer 2007
 
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer Special Report: Family Business
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer Special Report: Family Business2017 Edelman Trust Barometer Special Report: Family Business
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer Special Report: Family Business
 
Energy - Edelman Trust Barometer 2014, UK Data
Energy - Edelman Trust Barometer 2014, UK DataEnergy - Edelman Trust Barometer 2014, UK Data
Energy - Edelman Trust Barometer 2014, UK Data
 
2011 Australian Edelman Trust Barometer
2011 Australian Edelman Trust Barometer2011 Australian Edelman Trust Barometer
2011 Australian Edelman Trust Barometer
 
2017 Edelman Ireland Trust Barometer
2017 Edelman Ireland Trust Barometer 2017 Edelman Ireland Trust Barometer
2017 Edelman Ireland Trust Barometer
 
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - South Africa
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - South Africa2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - South Africa
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - South Africa
 

Similaire à 2018 Edelman Trust Barometer: Trust in Crisis

2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - UAE
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - UAE2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - UAE
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - UAEEdelman
 
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Australia Results
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Australia Results2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Australia Results
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Australia ResultsEdelman
 
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - South Africa Report
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - South Africa Report2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - South Africa Report
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - South Africa ReportEdelman
 
2018 Edelman Israel Trust Supplement
2018 Edelman Israel Trust Supplement2018 Edelman Israel Trust Supplement
2018 Edelman Israel Trust SupplementTal Shoham
 
2017 Edelman TRUST BAROMETER™- Global Results
2017 Edelman TRUST BAROMETER™- Global Results2017 Edelman TRUST BAROMETER™- Global Results
2017 Edelman TRUST BAROMETER™- Global ResultsEdelman
 
Edelman: Trust in Crisis
Edelman: Trust in CrisisEdelman: Trust in Crisis
Edelman: Trust in CrisisBrandwatch
 
Edelman Ireland 2018 Trust Barometer
Edelman Ireland 2018 Trust BarometerEdelman Ireland 2018 Trust Barometer
Edelman Ireland 2018 Trust BarometerEdelman
 
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Indonesia
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Indonesia2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Indonesia
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - IndonesiaEdelman APACMEA
 
2019 Edelman Trust Barometer
2019 Edelman Trust Barometer2019 Edelman Trust Barometer
2019 Edelman Trust BarometerDaniel Roth
 
2019 EDELMAN TRUST BAROMETER
2019 EDELMAN TRUST BAROMETER2019 EDELMAN TRUST BAROMETER
2019 EDELMAN TRUST BAROMETERZohar Urian
 
2019 edelman trust_barometer_global_report
2019 edelman trust_barometer_global_report2019 edelman trust_barometer_global_report
2019 edelman trust_barometer_global_reportJames Barclay
 
2019 Edelman Trust-Barometer Global Report
2019 Edelman Trust-Barometer Global Report2019 Edelman Trust-Barometer Global Report
2019 Edelman Trust-Barometer Global Report42medien
 
2016 trust barometer global master deck woolf institute
2016 trust barometer global master deck   woolf institute2016 trust barometer global master deck   woolf institute
2016 trust barometer global master deck woolf instituteChristina Fuhr, Ph.D.
 
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Singapore
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Singapore2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Singapore
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer SingaporeEdelman APACMEA
 
2016 Edelman TRUST BAROMETER - Global Results
2016 Edelman TRUST BAROMETER - Global Results2016 Edelman TRUST BAROMETER - Global Results
2016 Edelman TRUST BAROMETER - Global ResultsEdelman
 
Barómetro sobre CONFIANZA de Edelman 2016
Barómetro sobre CONFIANZA de Edelman 2016Barómetro sobre CONFIANZA de Edelman 2016
Barómetro sobre CONFIANZA de Edelman 2016Soymimarca
 
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Financial Services Results
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Financial Services Results2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Financial Services Results
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Financial Services ResultsEdelman
 
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Korea
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Korea2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Korea
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - KoreaEdelman APACMEA
 
Edelman Trust Barometer 2016 - UK Results
Edelman Trust Barometer 2016 - UK ResultsEdelman Trust Barometer 2016 - UK Results
Edelman Trust Barometer 2016 - UK ResultsEdelman_UK
 

Similaire à 2018 Edelman Trust Barometer: Trust in Crisis (20)

2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - UAE
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - UAE2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - UAE
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - UAE
 
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Australia Results
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Australia Results2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Australia Results
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Australia Results
 
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - South Africa Report
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - South Africa Report2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - South Africa Report
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - South Africa Report
 
2018 Edelman Israel Trust Supplement
2018 Edelman Israel Trust Supplement2018 Edelman Israel Trust Supplement
2018 Edelman Israel Trust Supplement
 
Barómatro de Confianza 2017 por Edelman- Trust barometer global report final
Barómatro de Confianza 2017 por Edelman- Trust barometer global report final Barómatro de Confianza 2017 por Edelman- Trust barometer global report final
Barómatro de Confianza 2017 por Edelman- Trust barometer global report final
 
2017 Edelman TRUST BAROMETER™- Global Results
2017 Edelman TRUST BAROMETER™- Global Results2017 Edelman TRUST BAROMETER™- Global Results
2017 Edelman TRUST BAROMETER™- Global Results
 
Edelman: Trust in Crisis
Edelman: Trust in CrisisEdelman: Trust in Crisis
Edelman: Trust in Crisis
 
Edelman Ireland 2018 Trust Barometer
Edelman Ireland 2018 Trust BarometerEdelman Ireland 2018 Trust Barometer
Edelman Ireland 2018 Trust Barometer
 
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Indonesia
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Indonesia2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Indonesia
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Indonesia
 
2019 Edelman Trust Barometer
2019 Edelman Trust Barometer2019 Edelman Trust Barometer
2019 Edelman Trust Barometer
 
2019 EDELMAN TRUST BAROMETER
2019 EDELMAN TRUST BAROMETER2019 EDELMAN TRUST BAROMETER
2019 EDELMAN TRUST BAROMETER
 
2019 edelman trust_barometer_global_report
2019 edelman trust_barometer_global_report2019 edelman trust_barometer_global_report
2019 edelman trust_barometer_global_report
 
2019 Edelman Trust-Barometer Global Report
2019 Edelman Trust-Barometer Global Report2019 Edelman Trust-Barometer Global Report
2019 Edelman Trust-Barometer Global Report
 
2016 trust barometer global master deck woolf institute
2016 trust barometer global master deck   woolf institute2016 trust barometer global master deck   woolf institute
2016 trust barometer global master deck woolf institute
 
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Singapore
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Singapore2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Singapore
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Singapore
 
2016 Edelman TRUST BAROMETER - Global Results
2016 Edelman TRUST BAROMETER - Global Results2016 Edelman TRUST BAROMETER - Global Results
2016 Edelman TRUST BAROMETER - Global Results
 
Barómetro sobre CONFIANZA de Edelman 2016
Barómetro sobre CONFIANZA de Edelman 2016Barómetro sobre CONFIANZA de Edelman 2016
Barómetro sobre CONFIANZA de Edelman 2016
 
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Financial Services Results
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Financial Services Results2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Financial Services Results
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Financial Services Results
 
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Korea
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Korea2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Korea
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Korea
 
Edelman Trust Barometer 2016 - UK Results
Edelman Trust Barometer 2016 - UK ResultsEdelman Trust Barometer 2016 - UK Results
Edelman Trust Barometer 2016 - UK Results
 

Plus de Edelman APACMEA

2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Japan
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Japan2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Japan
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - JapanEdelman APACMEA
 
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Hong Kong
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Hong Kong2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Hong Kong
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Hong KongEdelman APACMEA
 
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - China
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - China2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - China
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - ChinaEdelman APACMEA
 
2016 Earned Brand Japan
2016 Earned Brand Japan 2016 Earned Brand Japan
2016 Earned Brand Japan Edelman APACMEA
 
2016 Earned Brand Australia
2016 Earned Brand Australia2016 Earned Brand Australia
2016 Earned Brand AustraliaEdelman APACMEA
 
Trust in China and Europe 2016 (English)
Trust in China and Europe 2016 (English)Trust in China and Europe 2016 (English)
Trust in China and Europe 2016 (English)Edelman APACMEA
 
Trust in China and Europe 2016 (Chinese)
Trust in China and Europe 2016 (Chinese)Trust in China and Europe 2016 (Chinese)
Trust in China and Europe 2016 (Chinese)Edelman APACMEA
 
Edelman China Public Affairs Update - March 2016
Edelman China Public Affairs Update - March 2016   Edelman China Public Affairs Update - March 2016
Edelman China Public Affairs Update - March 2016 Edelman APACMEA
 
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Hong Kong
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Hong Kong2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Hong Kong
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Hong KongEdelman APACMEA
 
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Malaysia
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Malaysia2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Malaysia
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer MalaysiaEdelman APACMEA
 
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer India
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer India2016 Edelman Trust Barometer India
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer IndiaEdelman APACMEA
 
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer China - English
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer China - English2016 Edelman Trust Barometer China - English
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer China - EnglishEdelman APACMEA
 
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer China - Chinese
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer China - Chinese2016 Edelman Trust Barometer China - Chinese
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer China - ChineseEdelman APACMEA
 

Plus de Edelman APACMEA (15)

2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Japan
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Japan2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Japan
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Japan
 
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Hong Kong
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Hong Kong2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Hong Kong
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Hong Kong
 
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - China
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - China2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - China
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - China
 
2016 Earned Brand Japan
2016 Earned Brand Japan 2016 Earned Brand Japan
2016 Earned Brand Japan
 
2016 Earned Brand India
2016 Earned Brand India2016 Earned Brand India
2016 Earned Brand India
 
2016 Earned Brand China
2016 Earned Brand China2016 Earned Brand China
2016 Earned Brand China
 
2016 Earned Brand Australia
2016 Earned Brand Australia2016 Earned Brand Australia
2016 Earned Brand Australia
 
Trust in China and Europe 2016 (English)
Trust in China and Europe 2016 (English)Trust in China and Europe 2016 (English)
Trust in China and Europe 2016 (English)
 
Trust in China and Europe 2016 (Chinese)
Trust in China and Europe 2016 (Chinese)Trust in China and Europe 2016 (Chinese)
Trust in China and Europe 2016 (Chinese)
 
Edelman China Public Affairs Update - March 2016
Edelman China Public Affairs Update - March 2016   Edelman China Public Affairs Update - March 2016
Edelman China Public Affairs Update - March 2016
 
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Hong Kong
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Hong Kong2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Hong Kong
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Hong Kong
 
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Malaysia
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Malaysia2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Malaysia
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Malaysia
 
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer India
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer India2016 Edelman Trust Barometer India
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer India
 
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer China - English
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer China - English2016 Edelman Trust Barometer China - English
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer China - English
 
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer China - Chinese
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer China - Chinese2016 Edelman Trust Barometer China - Chinese
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer China - Chinese
 

Dernier

BLOOM_April2024. Balmer Lawrie Online Monthly Bulletin
BLOOM_April2024. Balmer Lawrie Online Monthly BulletinBLOOM_April2024. Balmer Lawrie Online Monthly Bulletin
BLOOM_April2024. Balmer Lawrie Online Monthly BulletinBalmerLawrie
 
Call Us ➥9654467111▻Call Girls In Delhi NCR
Call Us ➥9654467111▻Call Girls In Delhi NCRCall Us ➥9654467111▻Call Girls In Delhi NCR
Call Us ➥9654467111▻Call Girls In Delhi NCRSapana Sha
 
Beyond Resumes_ How Volunteering Shapes Career Trajectories by Kent Kubie
Beyond Resumes_ How Volunteering Shapes Career Trajectories by Kent KubieBeyond Resumes_ How Volunteering Shapes Career Trajectories by Kent Kubie
Beyond Resumes_ How Volunteering Shapes Career Trajectories by Kent KubieKent Kubie
 
How To Utilize Calculated Properties in your HubSpot Setup
How To Utilize Calculated Properties in your HubSpot SetupHow To Utilize Calculated Properties in your HubSpot Setup
How To Utilize Calculated Properties in your HubSpot Setupssuser4571da
 
The Skin Games 2024 25 - Sponsorship Deck
The Skin Games 2024 25 - Sponsorship DeckThe Skin Games 2024 25 - Sponsorship Deck
The Skin Games 2024 25 - Sponsorship DeckToluwanimi Balogun
 
Brand experience Dream Center Peoria Presentation.pdf
Brand experience Dream Center Peoria Presentation.pdfBrand experience Dream Center Peoria Presentation.pdf
Brand experience Dream Center Peoria Presentation.pdftbatkhuu1
 
TOP DUBAI AGENCY OFFERS EXPERT DIGITAL MARKETING SERVICES.pdf
TOP DUBAI AGENCY OFFERS EXPERT DIGITAL MARKETING SERVICES.pdfTOP DUBAI AGENCY OFFERS EXPERT DIGITAL MARKETING SERVICES.pdf
TOP DUBAI AGENCY OFFERS EXPERT DIGITAL MARKETING SERVICES.pdfasiyahanif9977
 
Uncover Insightful User Journey Secrets Using GA4 Reports
Uncover Insightful User Journey Secrets Using GA4 ReportsUncover Insightful User Journey Secrets Using GA4 Reports
Uncover Insightful User Journey Secrets Using GA4 ReportsVWO
 
GreenSEO April 2024: Join the Green Web Revolution
GreenSEO April 2024: Join the Green Web RevolutionGreenSEO April 2024: Join the Green Web Revolution
GreenSEO April 2024: Join the Green Web RevolutionWilliam Barnes
 
Forecast of Content Marketing through AI
Forecast of Content Marketing through AIForecast of Content Marketing through AI
Forecast of Content Marketing through AIRinky
 
April 2024 - VBOUT Partners Meeting Group
April 2024 - VBOUT Partners Meeting GroupApril 2024 - VBOUT Partners Meeting Group
April 2024 - VBOUT Partners Meeting GroupVbout.com
 

Dernier (20)

BLOOM_April2024. Balmer Lawrie Online Monthly Bulletin
BLOOM_April2024. Balmer Lawrie Online Monthly BulletinBLOOM_April2024. Balmer Lawrie Online Monthly Bulletin
BLOOM_April2024. Balmer Lawrie Online Monthly Bulletin
 
Creator Influencer Strategy Master Class - Corinne Rose Guirgis
Creator Influencer Strategy Master Class - Corinne Rose GuirgisCreator Influencer Strategy Master Class - Corinne Rose Guirgis
Creator Influencer Strategy Master Class - Corinne Rose Guirgis
 
Call Us ➥9654467111▻Call Girls In Delhi NCR
Call Us ➥9654467111▻Call Girls In Delhi NCRCall Us ➥9654467111▻Call Girls In Delhi NCR
Call Us ➥9654467111▻Call Girls In Delhi NCR
 
How to Create a Social Media Plan Like a Pro - Jordan Scheltgen
How to Create a Social Media Plan Like a Pro - Jordan ScheltgenHow to Create a Social Media Plan Like a Pro - Jordan Scheltgen
How to Create a Social Media Plan Like a Pro - Jordan Scheltgen
 
Generative AI Master Class - Generative AI, Unleash Creative Opportunity - Pe...
Generative AI Master Class - Generative AI, Unleash Creative Opportunity - Pe...Generative AI Master Class - Generative AI, Unleash Creative Opportunity - Pe...
Generative AI Master Class - Generative AI, Unleash Creative Opportunity - Pe...
 
Beyond Resumes_ How Volunteering Shapes Career Trajectories by Kent Kubie
Beyond Resumes_ How Volunteering Shapes Career Trajectories by Kent KubieBeyond Resumes_ How Volunteering Shapes Career Trajectories by Kent Kubie
Beyond Resumes_ How Volunteering Shapes Career Trajectories by Kent Kubie
 
The Future of Brands on LinkedIn - Alison Kaltman
The Future of Brands on LinkedIn - Alison KaltmanThe Future of Brands on LinkedIn - Alison Kaltman
The Future of Brands on LinkedIn - Alison Kaltman
 
How To Utilize Calculated Properties in your HubSpot Setup
How To Utilize Calculated Properties in your HubSpot SetupHow To Utilize Calculated Properties in your HubSpot Setup
How To Utilize Calculated Properties in your HubSpot Setup
 
Brand Strategy Master Class - Juntae DeLane
Brand Strategy Master Class - Juntae DeLaneBrand Strategy Master Class - Juntae DeLane
Brand Strategy Master Class - Juntae DeLane
 
The Skin Games 2024 25 - Sponsorship Deck
The Skin Games 2024 25 - Sponsorship DeckThe Skin Games 2024 25 - Sponsorship Deck
The Skin Games 2024 25 - Sponsorship Deck
 
No Cookies No Problem - Steve Krull, Be Found Online
No Cookies No Problem - Steve Krull, Be Found OnlineNo Cookies No Problem - Steve Krull, Be Found Online
No Cookies No Problem - Steve Krull, Be Found Online
 
Brand experience Dream Center Peoria Presentation.pdf
Brand experience Dream Center Peoria Presentation.pdfBrand experience Dream Center Peoria Presentation.pdf
Brand experience Dream Center Peoria Presentation.pdf
 
The Fandom Dividend - Catalyzing Brand Growth through Cultural Engagement - M...
The Fandom Dividend - Catalyzing Brand Growth through Cultural Engagement - M...The Fandom Dividend - Catalyzing Brand Growth through Cultural Engagement - M...
The Fandom Dividend - Catalyzing Brand Growth through Cultural Engagement - M...
 
TOP DUBAI AGENCY OFFERS EXPERT DIGITAL MARKETING SERVICES.pdf
TOP DUBAI AGENCY OFFERS EXPERT DIGITAL MARKETING SERVICES.pdfTOP DUBAI AGENCY OFFERS EXPERT DIGITAL MARKETING SERVICES.pdf
TOP DUBAI AGENCY OFFERS EXPERT DIGITAL MARKETING SERVICES.pdf
 
Uncover Insightful User Journey Secrets Using GA4 Reports
Uncover Insightful User Journey Secrets Using GA4 ReportsUncover Insightful User Journey Secrets Using GA4 Reports
Uncover Insightful User Journey Secrets Using GA4 Reports
 
GreenSEO April 2024: Join the Green Web Revolution
GreenSEO April 2024: Join the Green Web RevolutionGreenSEO April 2024: Join the Green Web Revolution
GreenSEO April 2024: Join the Green Web Revolution
 
Forecast of Content Marketing through AI
Forecast of Content Marketing through AIForecast of Content Marketing through AI
Forecast of Content Marketing through AI
 
April 2024 - VBOUT Partners Meeting Group
April 2024 - VBOUT Partners Meeting GroupApril 2024 - VBOUT Partners Meeting Group
April 2024 - VBOUT Partners Meeting Group
 
SEO Master Class - Steve Wiideman, Wiideman Consulting Group
SEO Master Class - Steve Wiideman, Wiideman Consulting GroupSEO Master Class - Steve Wiideman, Wiideman Consulting Group
SEO Master Class - Steve Wiideman, Wiideman Consulting Group
 
Turn Digital Reputation Threats into Offense Tactics - Daniel Lemin
Turn Digital Reputation Threats into Offense Tactics - Daniel LeminTurn Digital Reputation Threats into Offense Tactics - Daniel Lemin
Turn Digital Reputation Threats into Offense Tactics - Daniel Lemin
 

2018 Edelman Trust Barometer: Trust in Crisis

  • 2. 2 Methodology 2018 Edelman Trust Barometer Online Survey in 28 Markets 18 years of data 33,000+ respondents total All fieldwork was conducted between October 28 and November 20, 2017 APAC regional definition: Australia, China, Hong Kong, India, Indonesia, Japan, Malaysia, Singapore, S. Korea General Online Population 7 years in 25+ markets Ages 18+ 1,150 respondents per market All slides show general online population data unless otherwise noted Mass Population All population not including informed public Represents 85% of total global population Informed Public 10 years in 20+ markets Represents 15% of total global population 500 respondents in U.S. and China; 200 in all other markets Must meet 4 criteria: Ages 25-64 College educated In top 25% of household income per age group in each market Report significant media consumption and engagement in business news 28-market global data margin of error: General population +/- 0.6% (N=32,200), informed public +/- 1.2% (N=6,200), mass population +/- 0.6% (26,000+), half-sample global general online population +/- 0.8 (N=16,100). Market-specific data margin of error: General population +/- 2.9 (N=1,150), informed public +/- 6.9% (N = min 200, varies by market), China and U.S. +/- 4.4% (N=500), mass population +/- 3.0 to 3.6 (N =min 740, varies by market).
  • 3. Trust in Retrospect 3 Rising Influence of NGOs 2001 Business Must Partner with Government to Regain Trust 2009 Fall of the Celebrity CEO 2002 Earned Media More Credible Than Advertising 2003 U.S. Companies in Europe Suffer Trust Discount 2004 Trust Shifts from “Authorities” to Peers 2005 “A Person Like Me” Emerges as Credible Spokesperson 2006 Business More Trusted Than Government and Media 2007 Young Influencers Have More Trust in Business 2008 Trust is Now an Essential Line of Business 2010 Rise of Authority Figures 2011 Fall of Government 2012 Crisis of Leadership 2013 Business to Lead the Debate for Change 2014 Trust is Essential to Innovation 2015 Growing Inequality of Trust 2016 Trust in Crisis 2017 The Battle for Truth 2018
  • 4. Source: 2018 Edelman Trust Barometer. The Trust Index is an average of a market’s trust in the institutions of government, business, media and NGOs. General population, 28-market global total. 4 Average trust in institutions, general population, 2017 vs. 2018 Trust Index A World of Distrust Biggest changes in 47 Global 72 India 69 Indonesia 67 China 60 Singapore 60 UAE 53 The Netherlands 52 Mexico 52 U.S. 50 Colombia 49 Canada 48 Brazil 48 Italy 48 Malaysia 45 Argentina 44 Hong Kong 44 Spain 43 Turkey 42 Australia 42 S. Africa 41 Germany 40 France 40 U.K. 38 S. Korea 37 Sweden 36 Ireland 35 Japan 35 Poland 34 Russia U.S. -9 China +7 S. Korea +6 UAE +6 Italy -5 Trust (60-100) Neutral (50-59) Distrust (1-49) Trust decline in the U.S. is the steepest ever measured 48 Global 74 China 71 Indonesia 68 India 66 UAE 58 Singapore 54 Mexico 54 The Netherlands 53 Malaysia 49 Canada 47 Argentina 47 Colombia 47 Spain 46 Turkey 45 Hong Kong 44 Brazil 44 S. Korea 43 Italy 43 U.S. 41 Germany 41 Sweden 40 Australia 40 France 39 Poland 39 U.K. 38 Ireland 38 S. Africa 37 Japan 36 Russia 2017 General Population 2018 General Population Global Trust Index remains at distruster level 20 of 28 Markets are distrusters, up 1 from 2017
  • 5. 59 Global 83 China 81 Indonesia 77 India 76 UAE 70 Singapore 67 The Netherlands 65 Malaysia 65 Mexico 62 Canada 60 Argentina 57 Italy 57 Turkey 56 France 56 Sweden 55 Australia 55 Spain 54 Germany 52 U.K. 51 Brazil 50 Colombia 50 S. Korea 49 Hong Kong 48 Ireland 48 Poland 47 Russia 46 Japan 45 S. Africa 45 U.S. 60 Global 80 India 79 China 78 Indonesia 77 UAE 71 Singapore 68 U.S. 62 Canada 62 The Netherlands 61 Italy 61 Mexico 57 Malaysia 57 Spain 56 France 56 U.K. 55 Colombia 54 Australia 54 Germany 53 Hong Kong 51 Argentina 51 Brazil 50 S. Korea 50 Turkey 49 Japan 49 S. Africa 47 Sweden 45 Russia 44 Ireland 43 Poland Source: 2018 Edelman Trust Barometer. The Trust Index is an average of a market’s trust in the institutions of government, business, media and NGOs. Informed public, 28- market global total. 5 Average trust in institutions, informed public, 2017 vs. 2018 Trust Index Informed Public Declines to Neutral 2017 Informed Public 2018 Informed Public Biggest changes in U.S. -23 Argentina +9 Sweden +9 Malaysia +8 Turkey +7 U.S. Trust Index crashes 23 points A 1-point decline in the Global Trust Index Trust (60-100) Neutral (50-59) Distrust (1-49)
  • 6. 58 58 47 4749 48 33 42 73 74 63 64 51 54 33 42 Source: 2018 Edelman Trust Barometer. TRU_INS. Below is a list of institutions. For each one, please indicate how much you trust that institution to do what is right using a nine-point scale, where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal.” (Top 4 Box, Trust) Informed Public and General Population, U.S. The Trust Index is an average of a location's trust in the institutions of government, business, media and NGOs. Informed Public and General Population, U.S. 6 Trust Crash in U.S. Business MediaNGOs Government -9 -10 -14 -5 -22 -20 -30 -22 20182017 43TRUST INDEX 45 TRUST INDEX 9-point decrease Fell from 8th to 18th place General Population 23-point decrease Fell from 6th to last place Informed Public Y-to-Y Change− +0 Percent trust in each institution, and change from 2017 to 2018
  • 7. Source: 2018 Edelman Trust Barometer. TRU_INS. Below is a list of institutions. For each one, please indicate how much you trust that institution to do what is right using a nine-point scale, where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal.” (Top 4 Box, Trust) S11. For whom did you vote for in the last Presidential election? General population, U.S., among Trump (n=373) and Clinton (n=502) voters. 7 Percent trust in each institution, Trump vs. Clinton voters U.S. Trust in Media Diverges Along Voting Lines 47 57 35 27 54 47 35 61 Business MediaNGOs Government difference in trust in the media 34pt Trump Voters Clinton Voters 22-point decline since the election
  • 8. 8 Government Most Broken in the U.S. Which institution is the most broken? Source: 2018 Edelman Trust Barometer. ATT_STE. Please indicate which institution – Government, Media, Business or NGO’s – is best described by each of the following statements? General population, U.S. and China. Government 38% Business 59% Government NGOs ✓ ✓ Government Path to Better Future in China Which institution is most likely to lead to a better future? 68% % % % % % % 29%
  • 9. 43 14 18 24 25 27 28 33 33 34 35 35 36 37 41 43 44 45 46 46 46 46 51 54 65 70 73 77 84 Global28 S.Africa Brazil Colombia Poland Italy Mexico France U.S. Spain Australia Ireland U.K. Japan Argentina Germany Russia S.Korea Canada HongKong Malaysia Sweden Turkey The Netherlands Singapore India Indonesia UAE China Source: 2018 Edelman Trust Barometer. TRU_INS. [GOVERNMENT IN GENERAL] Below is a list of institutions. For each one, please indicate how much you trust that institution to do what is right using a nine-point scale where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal.“ (Top 4 Box, Trust) General Population, 28-market global total. 9 Trust in Government Increases in 16 of 28 Markets Percent trust in government, and change from 2017 to 2018 l llllllllllllllllllllllllllll+2 -1 -6 -8 +5 -4 +4 +8 -14 +9 -2 +3 0 0 +8 +5 0 +17 +3 +6 +9 +1 0 +3 -4 -5 +2 +2 +8 Distrusted in 21 Markets TrustNeutralDistrust Y-to-Y Change− +0
  • 11. 43 30 31 32 32 32 33 33 34 35 35 39 40 42 42 43 43 43 44 45 47 48 49 52 55 56 61 68 71 Global28 Turkey Australia Japan Sweden U.K. France Ireland Poland Russia S.Africa Argentina S.Korea Germany U.S. Brazil Colombia HongKong Spain Italy Malaysia Mexico Canada Singapore TheNetherlands UAE India Indonesia China Source: 2018 Edelman Trust Barometer. TRU_INS. [MEDIA IN GENERAL] Below is a list of institutions. For each one, please indicate how much you trust that institution to do what is right using a nine-point scale where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal.“ (Top 4 Box, Trust) General population, 28-market global total. 11 Percent trust in media, and change from 2017 to 2018 Media Least Trusted Institution Globally TrustNeutralDistrust Distrusted in 22 of 28 of markets l llllllllllllllllllllllllllll0 +5 -1 0 -1 0 0 +4 +3 +4 -4 -1 0 0 -5 -5 -2 +1 0 -3 +5 +1 +4 -2 +1 +12 -5 +1 +6 Y-to-Y Change− +0
  • 12. Source: 2018 Edelman Trust Barometer. ATT_MED_AGR. Below is a list of statements. For each one, please rate how much you agree or disagree with that statement using a nine-point scale where one means “strongly disagree” and nine means “strongly agree”. (Top 4 Box, Agree), question asked of half of the sample. General population; 28-market global total. 12 Percent who worry about false information or fake news being used as a weapon World Worried About Fake News as a Weapon worry about false information or fake news being used as a weapon, globally 7 in 10 Nearly 61-65 66-70 71-75 76-80 Japan Australia Hong Kong Singapore S. Africa UAE China India Malaysia S. Korea Indonesia APACMEA
  • 13. % Trust in Platforms 51 40 33 33 47 43 35 40 36 53 54 42 68 54 46 53 49 37 47 48 51 73 62 71 62 64 58 68 55 Global28 Germany Ireland Sweden TheNetherlands Canada Australia France U.K. Italy Singapore U.S. China Argentina S.Africa Spain HongKong Japan Russia S.Korea Poland India Colombia Indonesia UAE Brazil Malaysia Mexico Turkey % Trust in Journalism 59 61 53 52 66 61 52 57 53 67 66 53 77 62 54 61 55 41 51 52 54 74 62 71 62 63 57 65 42   c cccccccccccccccccccccccccccc Source: 2018 Edelman Trust Barometer. COM_MCL. When looking for general news and information, how much would you trust each type of source for general news and information? Please use a nine-point scale where one means that you “do not trust it at all” and nine means that you “trust it a great deal.” (Top 4 Box, Trust), question asked of half of the sample. General population, 28-market global total. Journalism is an average of traditional media and online-only media. Platforms is an average of search engines and social media. 13 Gap in trust in journalism vs. platforms Journalism More Trusted Than Platforms in 21 Markets Journalism More Trusted Platforms More Trusted 8 21 20 19 19 18 17 17 17 14 12 11 9 8 8 8 6 4 4 4 3 1 0 0 0 -1 -1 -3 -13 Gap Average trust in search engines and social media platforms Average trust in traditional and online-only media
  • 15. Source: 2018 Edelman Trust Barometer. TRU_INS. Below is a list of institutions. For each one, please indicate how much you trust that institution to do what is right using a nine-point scale, where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal.” (Top 4 Box, Trust) Informed Public and General Population, Hong Kong. 15 Percent trust in each institution, and change from 2017 to 2018, in Hong Kong Distrust Convergence 20182017 Y-to-Y Change− +0 70 43 53 44 65 45 46 39 -5 -5+2 -7 Informed Public 59 40 42 34 55 46 43 36 BusinessMediaNGOs Government -4 +2+1+6 General Population NGOs Media BusinessGovernment
  • 16. 16 The Honeymoon Period Joko Widodo October ‘14 49% 65% 2014 2015 Moon Jae-in May ‘17 Malcolm Turnbull September ‘15 37% 45% 2015 2016 Emmanuel Macron May ‘17 25% 33% 2017 2018 28% 45% 2017 2018 Sergio Mattarella February ‘15 15% 26% 2015 2016 Narendra Modi May ‘14 51% 68% 2014 2015
  • 17. 17 Government Most Broken in Hong Kong Which institution is the most broken? Source: 2018 Edelman Trust Barometer. ATT_STE. Please indicate which institution – Government, Media, Business or NGO’s – is best described by each of the following statements? General population, 28-market global total and Hong Kong. Business NGOs Government Government Media Media ✓ Government Path to Better Future Which institution is most likely to lead to a better future? NGOs Business23% 19% 30% 6% 8% 28% 18% 13%31% 42% Hong KongGlobal ✓
  • 18. Media
  • 19. Source: 2018 Edelman Trust Barometer. TRU_INS. Below is a list of institutions. For each one, please indicate how much you trust that institution to do what is right using a nine-point scale, where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal.” (Top 4 Box, Trust) Informed Public and General Population, Hong Kong. 19 Trust in Media 54 55 55 50 47 42 43 65 68 63 41 53 53 46 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 General Informed 6 yr. Trend Informed -19 General -11 Media Trend
  • 20. Traditional Media on the Rise Source: 2018 Edelman Trust Barometer. COM_MCL. When looking for general news and information, how much would you trust each type of source for general news and information? Please use a nine- point scale where one means that you “do not trust it at all” and nine means that you “trust it a great deal.” (Top 4 Box, Trust). CRE_PPL. Below is a list of people. In general, when forming an opinion of a company, if you heard information about a company from each person, how credible would the information be—extremely credible, very credible, somewhat credible, or not credible at all? (Top 2 Box, Very/Extremely Credible). Both questions asked of half of the sample. General population, Hong Kong. Journalism is an average of traditional media and online-only media. Percent trust in each source for general news and information 20 Journalism +755 59 41 41 36 63 55 47 43 34 Traditional Media Online Search Engines Online-Only Media Social Media Owned Media -4+8 +2+6 -2 20182017 Y-to-Y Change− +0 Journalists a credible source +8
  • 21. Source: 2018 Edelman Trust Barometer. News Engagement Scale, built from MED_SEG_OFT. How often do you engage in the following activities related to news and information? Indicate your answer using the 7-point scale below. For details on how the News Engagement Scale was built, please refer to the Technical Appendix. ATT_MED_AGR. Below is a list of statements. For each one, please rate how much you agree or disagree with that statement using a nine-point scale where one means “strongly disagree” and nine means “strongly agree”. (Top 4 Box, Agree), question asked of half of the sample. General population, Hong Kong. 21 Fake news is leading to skepticism and confusion But High Disengagement Reveals Concerns 58% The average person does not know how to tell good journalism from rumor or falsehoods 64% It is becoming harder to tell if a piece of news was produced by a respected media organization 67% Worry about false information or fake news being used as a weapon 40% Are disengaged with news – consume news less than weekly Disengaged Fake News Good vs. Bad Source
  • 22. Source: 2018 Edelman Trust Barometer. ATT_MED_AGR. Below is a list of statements. For each one, please rate how much you agree or disagree with that statement using a nine-point scale where one means “strongly disagree” and nine means “strongly agree”. (Top 4 Box, Agree), question asked of half of the sample. General population, Hong Kong. 22 News Organizations’ Priorities Under the Spotlight 65% are more concerned with attracting a big audience than reporting Attracting Large Audiences 62% support an ideology vs. informing the public Politics 64% sacrifice accuracy to be the first to break a story Breaking News 61% feel advertisers have too much influence on what news the public gets to see Advertiser Influence
  • 23. Source: 2018 Edelman Trust Barometer. News Engagement Scale, built from MED_SEG_OFT. How often do you engage in the following activities related to news and information? Indicate your answer using the 7-point scale below. General population, Hong Kong. For details on how the News Engagement Scale was built, please refer to the Technical Appendix. Source: Warc 2017 Media Consumption Overview: Hong Kong 23 Declining Trust In Media Does Not Equate To Declining Influence 25 25 31 29 Consumers Amplifiers Global Hong Kong Consume news about weekly or more Consume news about weekly or more AND share or post content several times a month or more Hong Kong Media Consumption Daily hours and minutes 2016 2017 Print press 0:37 0:42 Online press 0:47 0:58 Broadcast radio 0:43 0:47 Linear TV 1:38 1:49 Social media 1:39 2:01
  • 25. Source: Edelman Trust Barometer. TRU_INS. Below is a list of institutions. For each one, please indicate how much you trust that institution to do what is right using a nine-point scale, where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal.” (Top 4 Box, Trust). TRU_NAT. Now we would like to focus on global companies headquartered in specific countries. Please indicate how much you trust global companies headquartered in the following countries to do what is right. Use the same 9-point scale where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal”. (Top 4 Box, Trust) Informed Public and General Population, Hong Kong. 25 Gap between general and informed is narrowing Trust in Business 42 43 41 38 39 34 36 47 60 49 42 43 44 39 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 General Informed Company’s Headquarters Impacts Trust in Hong Kong 15% 27%
  • 26. Source: 2018 Edelman Trust Barometer. TRU_IND. Please indicate how much you trust businesses in each of the following industries to do what is right. Again, please use the same 9-point scale where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal”. (Top 4 Box, Trust), industries shown to half of the sample. General Population, Hong Kong. 26 Percent who trust each sector, and change from 2017 to 2018, in Hong Kong Trust Declines in 14 of 15 Sectors 47 47 51 51 56 59 59 60 61 63 68 71 72 72 75 Entertainment Financial services Automotive Consumer packaged goods Food and beverage Energy Telecommunications Retail Fashion Manufacturing Technology Health care Education Transportation Professional services -10 -6 -6 -6 -8 TrustNeutralDistrust Y-to-Y Change− +0 Industry 5 yr. Trend Technology -11 Energy -9 Telecommunications -10 Food and beverage -14 Automotive -23 Consumer packaged goods -17 Entertainment -17 Financial services -15 -1 -2 +2 -1 -8 -8 -10 -14 -8 -10
  • 28. Source: 2018 Edelman Trust Barometer. CEO_AGR. Thinking about CEOs, how strongly do you agree or disagree with the following statements? (Top 4 Box, Agree), question asked of half of the sample. General population, Hong Kong. 28 Business Expected To Drive Change 67% Agree that CEOs should take the lead on change rather than waiting for government to impose it 50% Believe companies who only think about themselves and their profits are bound to fail
  • 29. 58 58 51 51 46 41 40 40 39 36 35 Apersonlike yourself Technicalexpert Academic expert NGO representative Successful entrepreneur Employee CEO Journalist Government official/regulator Boardof directors Financial industryanalyst Source: 2018 Edelman Trust Barometer. CRE_PPL. Below is a list of people. In general, when forming an opinion of a company, if you heard information about a company from each person, how credible would the information be—extremely credible, very credible, somewhat credible, or not credible at all? (Top 2 Box, Very/Extremely Credible), question asked of half of the sample. General population, Hong Kong. 29 Percent who rate each spokesperson as very/extremely credible, and change from 2017 to 2018, in Hong Kong Voices of Authority Regain Credibility +2 +7 -1 +3 +6 -1 +13 +8 +10 +8 +9 − Y-to-Y Change+0
  • 30. Opportunities for CEOs to Lead Source: 2018 Edelman Trust Barometer. CEO_EXP. Below is a list of potential expectations that you might have for a company CEO. Thinking about CEOs in general, whether they are global CEOs or a CEO who oversees a particular market, how would you characterize each using the following three-point scale? (Most important responsibility, code 3), question asked of half of the sample. CEO_AGR. Thinking about CEOs, how strongly do you agree or disagree with the following statements? (Top 4 Box, Agree), question asked of half of the sample. General population; Hong Kong 30 Percent who say each is one of the most important expectations they have for a CEO in Hong Kong 46 49 51 52 58 64 65 65 74 Ensure gender equality in worker pay Ensure company's workforce is inclusive/diverse Set high ethical standards Communicate regularly with employees Be a leading voice in matters related to their industry Ensure business decisions reflect the values of the company Increase company's profits/stock price Ensure company produces high quality products/services Ensure company is trusted Have no respect for CEOs who remain silent on important issues 50%
  • 31. 31 People Define “Media” As Both Publishers and Platforms: Multichannel Engagement What did you assume was meant by the phrase “media in general”? Source: 2018 Edelman Trust Barometer. TRU_MED. In the above question, what did you assume was meant by the phrase “media in general”? General population, Hong Kong. Social is a net of TRU_MEDr3 and r12, Influencers is r5, Search is r7, Brands is a net of r10 and r11, Journalists is a net of r1 and r6, News Apps is r8. PLATFORMS PUBLISHERS 29%64% SearchSocial 60% News Apps 32% Influencers 90% Journalists 48% Brands
  • 32. 32 Conclusions For Businesses Increasing loss of trust in business Increasing expectation to address social issues Increasing confusion about what information can be trusted Companies must build social impact into their business models Redefine what you think of as media and use it to own a clearer story Use voices of authority and take a stance on social issues + 1 2 3