Industrial Eco park

1. Industrial policy and Eco-industrial Park
in Korea
Prof. Hung Suck Park
Department of Chemical Engineering
Ulsan College
hspark@uc.ac.kr
EIP Information session
Krakatau Industrial Park, Indonesia
16 June 2022

2. Contents
1. Korean industrial policy and industrial park
2. Eco-industrial Park
3. Korea Eco-industrial Park Program
4. Institutional arrangement
5. International cooperation
6. Takeaways

3. Korean Industrial Policy and Industrial Park
: Economic growth engine of Korea

4. 1960s 1970s 1980s 1990s 2000s 2010s
Nature of
development
• Formation of
industrial
development
base
• Establishment
and development
of heavy
industries
• Modification of
industrial
structure
• Acceleration of
industrial
development
• Continual
industrial growth
and expansion
• Promotion and
expansion of new
industry
Policy basis • Government-led,
export-oriented
industrial
development
• Promotion of
light industries
• Establishment
and expansion of
infrastructure
• Government-led
growth of heavy
chemical
industries
• Rationalization
of heavy
chemical
industries
• Promotion of
exports in
technology-
intensive
industries
• Deregulation and
private industry-
led development
• Industrial
restructuring
under IMF
guidance
• Development of
knowledge-based
and futuristic
industries
• Transition to
innovative
economy
• Balanced
development
 Realization of
creative
economy
through
convergence
of science and
ICT
 Convergence,
new growth
engine
industry,
future industry
Key
industries
• Textile, electrical
products,
footwear
• Petrochemical,
steel,
shipbuilding,
automobile,
machinery
• Semiconductor,
electronics,
automobile
• Service-based
software industry,
semiconductors,
precision
chemistry,
automation
• Information and
communication
technology (ICT),
Video games,
biotechnology,
convergence
• Green technology,
High-tech
convergence,
High value
service, Creative
industry
Korean industrial development policy

5. 1960s 1970s 1980s 1990s 2000s 2010s
Petrochemicals
Textiles, Sewing
Steel, Machinery
Electronics
Materials & Parts Machines,
Transportation equip.
High-tech Industry Smart & advanced
structure of IP
 Progress of Industrial Parks in Korea
• Korea’s rapid economic growth has been driven by industry policy of establishing
industrial parks.
• Industrial parks were upgraded into industrial clusters, focusing more on R&D and
corporate supporting services in the 21st century.
• Gradual increase of designated IPs (As of the 2017)
Industrial Park Number
Area
(Million ㎡)
Company
Production
(Billion USD)
Export
(Billion USD)
National 44 788,.2 51,170 588.4 214.6
Regional 650 542.5 37,614 427.5 201.9
Urban 27 7.3 314 1.2 0.4
Agricultural 468 75.7 7,162 53.2 6.1
Total 1,189 1,413.7 87,360 1,070.3 423.0
4
Industrial Park Development in Korea

6.  Core infrastructure of the Korea Economy
• Impact of IPs in Korea(‘17) : 62% in Domestic Product, 73% in Export
Ulsan
National Industrial Complex General Industrial Complex Foreign Investment Zone Rural Industrial Complex
Seoul Namdong
Banwol Sihwa Gunsan
Gwangju Yeosu
Osong Bukpyeong
Gumi
Noksan Changwon
Representative
Industrial City in Korea
Contribution of Industrial Park in Korea Economy

7. -Area : 100,295 km2
-Pop. : 51,466,201
-GNP : $ 1460.49B
(As on 2016, KITA - Korea International Trade Association)
Food 17,08
Fuel 106,30
Chemicals 128,25
Intermediates 388,02
Machinery and
transport
equipment
1012,01
Micelanious 99,87
Import
($ 478.469 MM USD)
Export
($ 573.627 MM USD)
Food 84,498
Fuel 329,67
Chemicals 141,081
Intermediates 276,67
Machinery and
transport
equipment
487,79
Micelanious 127,16
Overview of Korean Economy (2017)

8. Emergencies
Water pollution
Nuisances:
noise, lighting/transport
Ozone-depleting and
greenhouse gases
Landscape disturbance
Exposure to
toxic chemicals
Spills
Marine pollution
Habitat degradation
Waste dumping
Groundwater contamination
Soil contamination
Air pollution
Source : Anthony Chiu (2006)
Industrial Environmental issues
Issue from Industrial Park

9. Eco-industrial Park
: Collective innovation by industrial symbiosis

10. Eco-Industrial Park
• A community of manufacturing and service business located on common
property.
• Members seek enhanced environmental, economic and social performance
through industrial symbiosis.
Resources
＆ Energy
RE
1 + RE
2+RE
3
EE
1 + EE
2+EE
3
Company 1
WE
1 + WI
1 = f(PE
1 + RI
1)
Company 2
WE
2 + WI
2 = f(PE
2 + RI
2)
Company 3
WE
3 + WI
3 = f(PE
3 + RI
3)
Wastes
WE
1 + WE
2 + WE
3
WE
1 WE
2
RE
2
RI
2 = WI
1
RI
1 = WI
3
RI
3 = WI
2
WE
3
RE
3
RE
1
Product
＆Service
PE
1 + PE
2+PE
3
PE
2
PE
2
PE
2
www.rti.org/pubs/case-study.pdf

11. 21 Deionized water 2002
19
Sludge
1998
17 Waste water
1995
22
Water
2004
10 Surface water 1987
27 Condensate 2009
8 Steam 1982
6 Heat
1980/89
18 Drain water 1995
16 Gypsum 1993
14 Tech water
1991
15 Gas 1992
11 Colling
Water 1987
9 Steam 1982
25 Sea water 2007
The
Municipality
of
Kalundborg
DONG Energy
Asnaes
Power Station
RGS
90
Fertilizer
industry
Gyproc Recovery of
nickel
And vanadium
Cement
Industry
Pig
farms
Farms
The Symbiosis Institute
1996
Lake
Tiss
o
Inbicon
Fish
farm
Waste water
treatment
Purifica-tion
of water
Pyroneer
Re-use
basin
28
Straw 2009
1 Surface water
1961
3
Surface
Water
1973
7
Heat
1981
29
Bioethanol
30
Lignin
2010
31
C5/C6
sugars
2010
13 Sulphur 1990
Fertilizer 2001
Statoil
Refinery
Kara/Noveren
23 Waste gypsum
2
Gas 1972
20
Fly
Ash
1999
5
Fly
Ash
1979
12
Yeast slurry
1989
4
Biomass/NovoGro
1976
Surface water
Sea water
Waste gypsum
Steam/Heat
Purified water
Sludge
Gypsum
Water condensate
Yeast slurry/Biomass/NovoGro
Gas (Discontinued)
Deionized water
Fly ash
Drain water
Carbohydrate
Sulphur fertilizer
26 Steam
2009
33 Gasifier 2011
Kalundborg Industrial Symbiosis:
B-to-B IS Contract
Marian, 2015
Fann
s
Novozyme
s
Novo
Nordisk

12. Kalundborg Industrial Symbiosis:
B-to-B IS Contract
Robin Branson, 2016

13. 13

14. List of eco-criteria

15. 15
Success factors of Eco-innovation park

16. 16

17. Korean Eco-industrial Park Program
:Transform of IP to EIP through Industrial symbiosis

18. 2005. 11 :
2010. 06 :
2015. 01 :
Pilot : 5 industrial complexes
Diffusion : 46 industrial complexes with a Standard EIP model
(EIP design project for Bangladesh Chittagong Economy Processing Zone : ‘12)
Completion: national EIP networks
1st phase Pilot period
2005.11 ~ 2010.5
Pilot on 5 industrial complexes
2nd phase Diffusion period
2010.6 ~ 2014.12
Diffusion on
38 industrial complexes
3rd phase Completion period
2015.1 ~ 2019.12
Construction of
national EIP network
18
3 Phase-15 years Korean EIP Master Plan: (‘05~’19)
1st Phase
2nd Phase
3rd Phase

19. Roadmap for EIP development (Andreas Koenig, 2005)

20. Selecting the champion
of the project
Setting up the EIP team Data collection
Network Searching
Recruiting potential
partners
Business model
development
Feasibility investigation
Negotiation and contract
(MOU)
Maintenance and
continuous support to
synergy projects
Facilities and
Infrastructure design
and construction
Phase 1 : Establishment of Ulsan EIP center
Phase 2 : Symbiosis identification
Phase 3 : Symbiosis implementation
Top down network
searching by EIP team
Bottom up network
searching by diverse
synergy forums
Continuous IS Expansion
Strategy of Korea Eco-Industrial Park Initiative:
EIP Transition

21. Sustainable Eco-Polis Ulsan
Construction of Ulsan EIP
Ulsan/Mipo·Onsan EIP Center
Polluted City
Eco-polis Ulsan
• Environment Friendly City
• Clean Industrial Park
Stack Industry
Clean Industry
• Innovation of Industry
• Incubation of New Industry
Hollistic App.
Credibility
Feasible Objective
Develop new
symbiosis
Dissemination
EIP specialist
nurture
Education and
publicity
Clear Vision
Human Resource
Academia
Industry
Consensus Formation
Cooperative System
Tenants
Universities
Ulsan, Busan etc.
Community
NGOs
Ulsan City
Gu, Gun
Money
Material
Government
Industry
Process of Regional EIP Center Development(Ulsan’s case)

22. Organization
Mipo · Onsan EIP center
Executive Committee
Environment
Research Education/ Information
• EIP Network Survey
• Feasibility Study of
Industrial Symbiosis
• Project Evaluation and
Selection
• Integrated EMS
Development
• Environmental Output
Education
• LCA Education
• Report Education
• Education Program for
EIP Experts
• Publicity Education
• Information Sharing
• International Cooperation
Administration
Technology Development
Project
EMS Project
Steering
Committee
Advisory
Committee
Process of Regional EIP Center Development

23. Evaluation items Evaluation contents
Project goal and strategy
 Implementation strategy for EIP construction and expansion
 Specificity, feasibility, and clarity of IS business promotion goals
 Linkage and feasibility of project content and support measures
 Efficiency of planning and utilization plan of EIP establishment experts, efficiency of business promotion
system
Securing the foundation for project
implementation
 Whether to acquire core companies that can play a central role in EIP construction
 Whether to acquire a "catalyst company" in which a by-product exchange network can be linked
 Possibility to derive the necessary technology for inter-firm linkage and applicability of technology
 Contribution of the local government to the project, whether it supports the budget, and how to connect with
the community
Expected performance for project
implementation
 Current environmental and economic effects
 Environmental and economic expectations for participating companies
 Environmental and economic effects of participating companies in pursuit of EIP project
Selection Criteia for regional EIP Center 1 phase

24. R&DB IS Project Development Process
Identification → Feasibility study → IS business Implementation
Process
Project Financing Source
Central Gov.(70%) & Local Gov.(20% : matching), Private Co.(10% : participation fee)
Select based on
Feasibility Potential
Technology fee
(10~40% of government funding)
Budget for EIP projects
Research funding
(within 70% of necessary budget)
Assessment board
(project selection for funding)
Support for project
management
Top-down
proposal
Bottom-up
Project suggestion
Research funding
(10%)
Research funding
(20%)
Profit Sharing
Negotiation among Co’s
Commercial Design
Finding : I.S. Project
Select based on
Feasibility Potential
Regional EIP Centers
Project Co.
Local Gov.
Main Co
University/Research
institute/Company

25. Evaluation items points Evaluation contents Evaluation criteria
Project plan
5 Project purpose  Suitability for business purposes
5 Project goals  Realization of business goals
5 Securing strategy
 Possibility of resource circulation linkage
 EIP promotion system construction
 Establishment of communication system between local tenants
5
Compatibility
of contents
 Propriety of key projects
 Analysis of EIP status
 Compatibility of EIP construction contents
EIP construction
8
Realization of resource
circulation
 General status of target IP (Production, employment, number of companies)
 By-product discharge of target IP (waste, waste heat, wastewater etc.)
 Status of catalyst companies for IS
 Potential for resource recycling
8
Activation of company
participation
 Activities of cooperation with tenants
 Number of companies wishing to participate in EIP business
8
Promoting local Community
Cooperation
 Collaboration Challenge from Cooperation between local Community
 Supporting of cooperation between Industry, academy and institution
8 Securing ecological space
 Planning for the creation of the EIP ecological environment
 Demand for the creation of the ecological environment
8 Condition of EIP construction
 National industrial complex development scale
 Possibility of linking Hub-Sub IP
 Material and energy exchange between Hub-Sub industrial complex
Roles of local
government
10
Willing for promotion of EIP
business
 Activities to improve the local environment
10 Contents of support
 Matching fund
 Support performance for IP
10 Planning for support  Support for solving difficulties of tenant companies
Expectation 10 Performance of EIP project  Environment improvement, technology development and business linkage expectation
Selection Criteria for Regional EIP Center in Stage 2

26. Evaluation items points Evaluation contents Evaluation criteria
Project plan
5 Project purpose  Suitability for business purposes
5 Project goals  Realization of business goals
5 Securing strategy
 Possibility of resource circulation linkage
 EIP promotion system construction
 Establishment of communication system between local tenants
5
Compatibility
of contents
 Propriety of key projects
 Analysis of EIP status
 Compatibility of EIP construction contents
EIP construction
5
Realization of resource
circulation
 General status of target IP (Production, employment, number of companies)
 By-product discharge of target IP (waste, waste heat, wastewater etc.)
 Status of catalyst companies for IS
 Potential for resource recycling
5
Expansion of industrial
symbiosis network
 Plan for expansion of project target (IP, company)
10
Development of industrial
symbiosis
 Plan for promotion of local friendly business
 Plan for securing business models and applying technology
15
Promotion of Resource
Recycling
 Plan for finding RESCO business and nurturing company
 Developing industrial symbiosis map and deriving industrial by-product statistics
 Plan for building and utilizing technology packages
5 Global cooperation
 Plan for Participation of Global EIP Business
 Plan for promotion of industrial symbiosis tourism
Roles of local
government
10
Willing for promotion of EIP
business
 Activities to improve the local environment
10 supporting for feasibility study
 Matching fund
 Plan to utilize corporate information held by local governments
10
supporting for
commercialization
 Support for solving difficulties of tenant companies
Expectation 10 Performance of EIP project  Environment improvement, technology development and business linkage expectation
Selection Criteria for Regional EIP Center in Stage 3

27. Exploring and planning
of industrial symbiosis item 3
Evaluation of
industrial symbiosis items
Feasibility study, B/M
Development, Commercialization
Yes
Proposal
Exploring and planning
of industrial symbiosis item 2
Evaluation of
industrial symbiosis items
Feasibility study, B/M
Development, Commercialization
Yes
Proposal
27
Establishment of regional consortium and planning
Evaluation for establishment
of regional center
(and annual performance evaluation)
Establishment of regional center and
promotion of regional EIP business
Approval
No
Proposal
Exploring and planning
of industrial symbiosis item 1
Evaluation of
industrial symbiosis items
Feasibility study, B/M
Development, Commercialization
Yes
Proposal
No
Submit the year's performance
including the plan for the next year
Planning, nomination and implementation
procedure of EIP in Korea

28. Division Indicator Content Qualitative Quantitative
Project Planning
Appropriateness
(10 point)
 Suitability with EIP business goals
 Consistency of centre's goals and promotion business
○
Specificity
(5 point)
 Establish a project plan that reflects regional characteristic
 Specification of regional characteristic project promotion
○
Project promotion
Achievement of business goal
(5 point)
 Achievement of project goals
 Establish and operate efficient project promotion system
○
Promotion of industrial
symbiosis project
(20 point)
 Efforts to find industrial symbiosis items ○
 Number of industrial symbiosis items Absolute
 Average number of participating companies for IS item Absolute
Cooperation with tenant
(8 point)
 Degree of network appropriateness and activation ○
 Network activity Absolute
Securing matching fund
(5 point)
 Percentage of securing fund from local government Absolute
Project performance
Execution expenses
(5 point)
 Execution rate of project expense Absolute
Commercialization of IS
completion project
(18 point)
 Project team’s efforts for commercialization ○
 Number of commercialization Relative
Achievement performance of
industrial symbiosis research
project (17 point)
 Number of patent application and registration Relative
 CO2 Reduction, sales, employment Relative
Proliferation Publicity (7 point)
 Number of public relations (broadcast, paper, book, journal,
etc.)
Absolute
28
Criteria of EIP Centre Performance(Annual)

29. District
Heat Supply
High Pressure
Steam
Power Plant
(Organic Rankin Cycle)
Heat Pinch
(Energy Optimization)
Middle
Pressure
Steam
Low Pressure
Steam
Incineration
heat Supply
Renewable
Energy Supply
Municipal
Incinerator Plant
SRF Boiler
Urban Area
Combustible
Municipal
Waste
Combustible
Industrial Waste &
By-product Gas
Industrial Complex
Exhaust Heat Low Pressure
Heat
ASR (Automobile Shredder Residue), SRF (Solid
Refuse Fuel)
Electricity Supply
Waste Heat
Supply
Energy Optimization (including waste to energy)
Achievement
of EIP Project
TypeofIndustrialSymbiosis
29

30. Economic benefit (Kw)
Steam supply
2008 2009 2010 2012 2013
Increase in supply after
the construction of more
plants
Expansion of incineration plant
(Capacity : 250 ton/day)
1.8
billion
3.0
billion
3.0
billion
5.9
billion
5.9
billion
15 t/h
15 t/h
30 t/h
60 t/h
60 t/h
Pressure : 16 ㎏f/㎠
Temp. : 203℃
Electricity
Condenser
Warm
Water
1,500 kwh
Steam
Warm
Water
Condensed Water
Recovery
Steam
45 ton/hr
Sung-am MWIF
11 ton/h
11 ton/h
23 ton/h
11 ton/h
34 ton/h
Sung-am MWIF
Steam
45 ton/hr
• Economic benefit: 7.1 million US$/yr (steam selling and B-C replacement)
• Environmental benefit: 55,500 ton CO2/yr, 176.8 ton air pollutants/yr
• Establishment of new factories (Employment for 140 people)
Scenario 1:
Implementation of
Top-Down IS Network
Sungam MWIF – Hyosung Company steam network (2008)
Sample Outcomes of EIP Project
30

31. • Economic benefit : 6.6 million US$/yr (Steam
selling and B-C replacement)
• Environmental benefit: Reduction of 63,643 ton
CO2/yr, 1,691.5 ton /yr air pollutants
CO2 generation CO2 reuse
BOILER
PROCES
S
Outside steam
CO2 generation
Cogeneration
Plant &
BOLIER PROCES
S
Outside sale
STEAM supply
Air emission
Implementation of
Top-Down IS Network
CO2 Supply
Steam
Supply
Carbon dioxide and steam network (2010)
Sample Outcomes of EIP Project
31

32. • Initial investment for the waste-heat recovery : 0.85 million US$ (Boiler complement
and piping new installation)
• Economic benefit : 2.32 million US$/yr (Steam selling and B-C replacement)
• Environmental benefit: Reduction of 14,810 ton CO2/yr, 20 ton SOx/yr, 3 ton NOx/yr
Existing
Equipment
Steam
generation
enhancement
by 50%
Waste heat boiler
(after improvement)
Steam generation
22ton/hr (Improved)
Vapor pressure (12kg/cm2g)
Bolier outlet temperature
(870 ℃ 220 ℃)
E company
(Drying equipment)
H Company E company
(Drying equipment)
Steam generation
8~12ton/hr
(Existing equipment)
Waste heat boiler
5~10 ton/hr 10~15 ton/hr 5~10 ton/hr
Steam supply line
Scenario 2:
Implementation of
Bottom-Up IS Network
Yoosung – Hankook Paper steam network (2007)
Sample Outcomes of EIP Project
32

33. • Economic benefit : 6.4 million US$/yr (Steam selling and B-C replacement)
• Environmental benefit: Reduction of 44468 ton CO2/yr, 314.1 ton /yr air pollutants
45 kg/cm2 (High
pressure)
30 ton/hr
5 kg/cm2 (Low
pressure)
20 ton/hr
19 kg/cm2 (Medium
pressure)
10 ton/hr
Scenario 3:
Implementation of
Hybrid IS Network
Sample Outcomes of EIP Project
Steam Network project (2009)
33

34. Achievement
of EIP Project
SuccessStoryof ResourceOptimization
34
Resource recovery company
Poongsan Co.
Collection of Zinc powder in
exhaust gas
0.8~1.0 ions/day
GB Metal Co.
Zinc dross
Collection of ash and scrap
1 to 1.5 ton/day
Resource Recycling Company
TNC Co.
• Collection of By-product zinc
powder in process
• Grinding coarse zinc powder
(>50 μm) using attrition mill
• production of high value zinc
flake powder
• Zink flake commercialization
User of recycled resource
KunsulChemicalindustrialCo..
Rust resistant paint products for
vessel and automobile
Sigma Samsung Co.
Rust resistant paint products for
vessel and automobile
Substituting import and even export by recycling high purity Zinc powder
Product (1~10um) By-product (30~70um) Zinc Flake (15~50um)

35. Achievement
of EIP Project
SuccessStoryof ResourceOptimization
35
Output
Sales of sodium hydrogen sulfide : 5.97 billion won/yr
Substitution effect of import with the product of sodium hydrogen sulfide.
Reuse 2,800 tons/year of hydrogen sulfide
Production of sodium hydrogen sulfide from hydrogen sulfide gas
Resource recovery company Resource Recycling Company
Encore Network Co.
Manufacture
NaSH Process
ISU Chemical Co.
SRU processing
TDM Processing
Korea Zinc Co.
LS-Nikko Copper Co.
Non-Ferrous smelting
Valuable metal recovery
and water treatment process
User of recycled resource
H2S gas NaHS

36. Before EIP initiative
After EIP initiative
Waste
Energy Water
Sungam MWIF 2nd
Hyosung
(Yongyeon 1st factory)
Chemical
Dau Metal
Metal recovery
Sungam MWLF
Municipal waste landfill
Onsan WWTF
Wastewater
treatment
Samsung
Petrochemical
Petrochemical
Korea Alcohol
Industrial
Chemical
Teakwang Industry
(1st factory)
Petrochemical
Ajin Metal
Aluminum
manufacture
Dongnam fine
Metal
Hanjoo Metal
Aluminum
manufacture
Kumho
Petrochemcial
Petrochemical
LS-Nikko
Non-ferrous metals
Korea Zinc
Non-ferrous metals
Bumwoo
Waste incinerator
Hanhwa Chemical
Chemical
SKC
Chemical
Yongyeon WWTF
Wastewater
treatment
Ulsan Pacific
chemical
Chemical
Taeyoung
Petrochemical
Korea PTG
Chemical
KP Chemical
Chemical
Hansol EME
Chemical
Hanwha
Petrochemical
Petrochemcial
Corinox
Steel
Bomyung
Chemical
manufacturer
Yongsan Chemical
Chemical
Shinheung
Chemical
Taewon Mulsan
Nonmetal
Poongsan Metal
Nonferrous metals
GB Metal
Steel
Kunsul chemical
Chemical
TNC
Metal
Sigma Samsung
Petrochemical
Daehan Jedang
Chemical
Hyosung
(Yongyeon 3rd factory)
Chemical
Hyosung
(Yongyeon 2nd factory)
Chemical
Sungam MWIF 1st
Municipal waste
incinerator
Hankuk Paper
Paper mill
Yoosung
Waste incinerator
S-Oil
Petrochemical
Bangojin MWWTF
Sewage treatment
Encore network
Chemical
ISU chemical
Chemical
POSCO
Steel
Aekyung
Petrochemical
Petrochemical
Evonik Headwaters
Korea
Petrochemical
Hanju Utility
Utility supplier
Koentec
Waste incinerator
NCC
Waste incinerator
SK chemical
Chemical
Korea
Petrochemical
Petrochemical
SGR tech
Waste treatment
LG Chemical
Chemical
HW I&C
Chemical
Dongsin chemical
Chemical
Samnam
Petrochemical
petrochemical
SK Petrochemical
Petochemical
Samsin chemical
Chemical
KMT
Waste treatment
Shinwha
Chemical
chemical
Korea Stytrolution
Chemical
Hyosung
(Ulsan Factory)
Petrochemical
Hyundai Motor
Automobile
Hyundai Hysco
Steel
Hyundai Heavy
industry
Industrial waste incinerator
Busan Noksan
MWWTF
Sewage treatment
Environsoft
Chemical
manufacture
SK Energy
Petrochemical
Samhwa Paint
Chemical
Serim
Chemical
Shinheung
Enertec
Waste treatment
JoGang Paint
Chemical
Dongbu Hitec
Chemical
Samyangsa
Food manufacture
Hangil
Chemical
Jinyang Chemical
Chemical
(2007)
(2008)
(2009)
(2010)
(2011)
(2012)
(2013)
Lotte Chemical
Chemical
Eastman
Chemical
KumHo P&B
Chemical
NEO
Chemical
Dongyang
Chemical
Taesung
Environmental
Institute
Dong-A Hwasung
Chemical
(2014)
(2015)
Amorepacific
Chemical
Hanju salt
Chemical
Mtecot
Chemical
Farmhouse
Zeusoil
Petrochemical
(2016)
KD powertech
Electricity
Korea Power
Exchange

37. Urban & Agricultural
Area
Company Company
Municipal
Waste
Organic & Bio
Waste (2)
Public Facility
Technology Demand
Supply
Municipal Incineration
Heat (2) Combustible
Waste (2)
Wastewater
Inorganic
Waste (2)
Industrial Incineration
Heat (4)
ProcessHeat(18)
Excess Heat (13) Heat Pinch
SRF
Distillation & Purification
By-product (49)
Alternative Raw Material (24)
HighValue-addedNewProduct(14)
RenewalEnergy(13)
Separation & Production
SRF & Gasification
High Value-
added New
Product (2)
High Value-
added New
Product (2)
Power Generation
Hot Water (2)
Hot Water (1)
Heat Exchange
District Heat (3)
Electricity
Generation (1)
Symbiosis projects in Ulsan were classified by emission source & type,
demand type and applied technology.
Achievement
of EIP Project
SupportingIS ProjectsinUlsan
37

38. EIP Project Benefits in Ulsan
From Intermediate processing To
Research/
Negotiation
Period
(month)
R&D Fund
(million
US$)
Economic benefit Environmental benefit
Investment
(million
US$)
Profit
(million
US$/y)
CO2
reduction
(ton/y)
Air pollutant
reduction
(ton/y)
SK energy EnvironSoft Noksan MWWTF 07/02 0.04 0.13 1.99 - -
Yoosung Corp. - Hankuk Paper 07/04 0.04 0.85 1.00 12,491.0 88.2
SK Energy SGR Tech Oil Spill Restoration Company 24/ - 0.31 0.2 0.12 - -
Sung-am MWIF - Hyosung Yongyeon 2nd plant 04/21 0.01 5.0 7.10 60,476.0 427.1
Dau metal Sunkyuong Watech Teakwang industry(I) 12/- 0.06 0.1 3.69 - -
KP Chemical
Hansol EME
Korea PTG SKC 12/12 0.10 14.0 4.01 34,906.7 246.6
Hyundai Heavy Industry - Hyundai Motor, Hyundai Hysco 12/34 0.08 6.2 3.20 10,188.0 273.2
POSCO Ilsin Polytech LS-Nikko 12/ - 0.15 - 1.15 - -
Dongnam fine, Hanjoo metal Ajin Metal Dongnam fine, Hanjoo metal 12/ - 0.20 0.1 3.30 - 1,325.0
Korea Zinc - Hankuk Paper 12/06 0.12 21.0 6.60 63.642.8 1,692.0
Poongsan Sinheung Teawon Mulsan 12/ - 0.06 0.5 1.67 - -
Poongsan metal,
GB metal, TNC
TNC
Kunsul chemical industry, Sigma
Samsung
12/ - 0.19 2.0 5.43 315.7 -
Aekyung petrochemical Hanju Evonik Headwaters Korea 12/06 0.10 1.5 2.82 33,094.0 -
ISU chemical Encore networks Korea Zinc, LS-Nikko 14/03 0.23 0.6 5.97 - -
SK petrochemical
Sam Nam Petrochemical
Dong-shin chemical CNT, Hansol Chemical 12/- 0.15 0.8 1.19 - -
Bumwoo - Korea petrochemical 12/- 0.09 10.0 5.56 25,084.0 -
Korean styrolution,
Kumho petrochemical
KMT Sinwha chem, Youngwon tech 12/- 0.08 0.52 1.28 - -
Yongsan chemical Bomyung Corinox 14/- 0.04 - 0.40 - -
Hyosung Ulsan plant - Hyosung Ulsan plant 12/- 0.21 1.0 0.52 - -
S-Oil Su engineering Bangeojin sewage treatment plant 12/- 0.11 0.25 0.65 949.0 -
Taekwang petrochemical 1st plant SK energy Hyosung Ulsan plant 15/- 0.15 6.0 9.2 50,396.0 -
Seong-am MWIF #2
Hyosung Yongyeon 2nd Plant
Korea PTG
Hyosung Yongyeon 1st Plant
SKC
1/- 0.01 8.2 14.7 39,427.0 -
(Operating 34 Projects)

39. EIP Project Benefits in Ulsan
From Intermediate processing To
Research/
Negotiation
Period
(month)
R&D Fund
(million
US$)
Economic benefit Environmental benefit
Investment
(million
US$)
Profit
(million
US$/y)
CO2
reduction
(ton/y)
Air pollutant
reduction
(ton/y)
Sinheung enertech Serim Samhwa paint 12/- 0.06 - 0.25 - -
LG chemical Ulsan Hangil Jinyang chemical 12/- 0.10 0.16 0.09 - -
Onsan sewage treatment facility - Hankook paper 12/- 0.04 1.20 0.90 4,757.0 -
Korea Zinc - GS ecometal, Hanwon fine chemical 12/- 0.04 1.68 1.67 14,572.0 -
SK chemical - Sk energy, Hyosung Ulsan 19/- 0.47 66.7 21.0 100,000.0 -
Poongsan - LS Nikko 26/- 0.21 - 0.24 - -
Kumho P&B Neo Kumho P&B 32/- 0.19 3.0 6.58 - -
SK energy, S-Oil Dongyang Donga hwasung 17/- 0.10 5.6 0.75 - -
Lotte Chemical - Eastman 12/- 0.04 2.86 2.43 37,327.0 -
Hanjoo Mtecot Local farmhouse 12/- 0.06 0.60 2.36 - -
Aekyung petrochemical Zeus KCC, Samsung SDI 18/- 0.17 5.0 3.39 - -
S-Oil KD powertech Korea power exchanger 7/- 0.03 80.0 9.08 53,499.0 -
Sung-am MWIF - Hyosung Yongyeon 2nd plant - - - 6.20 25,346.8 -
Korea Zinc - Hankuk Paper - - - 6.60 99,239.7 -
Total - 4.00 245.75 143.09 665,711.7 4,052.1
(Operating 34 Projects)

40. - Currency(￦1,000=$1)
* Including new factory investment
Projects
in operation
Researc
h funds
(million $)
Economic benefits
(million $)
Environmental benefits
Investment
Cost
reduction
revenue
Waste/By-
product
(ton/yr)
Water
(ton/yr)
Energy
(toe/yr)
CO2
reduction
(ton/yr)
Total 235 26.9 761.3 197.5 376.9 1,636,188 36,790,509 383,826 2,058,094
Regional
Center
Kyeonggi 22 2.9 125.0 14.2 17.4 86,216 88,7085 11,192 56,724
Ulsan 36 4.2 212.0 80.0 63.0 40,053 79,357 272,865 665,712
Busan 17 1.5 11.3 7.2 10.5 22,961 2,890 22,946 95,669
Chonbuk 25 2.2 36.1 6.0 32.6 150,236 - - 204,139
Chonnam 42 6.0 93.9 30.6 87.8 791,784 10,980 - 530,173
Kyeongbuk 40 4.6 210.4 47.0 85.8 436,016 36,571,514 55,053 351,834
Daegu 24 2.4 10.1 7.2 40.2 68,220 600 50 35,176
Choongbuk 19 1.9 44.9 5.1 25.6 40,007 36,860 20,521 73,462
Choongnam 6 0.9 15.0 0.1 11.1 636 - - 42,337
DaeJeon 1 0.1 0.6 0.2 1.5 322 - - -
Incheon 3 0.2 1.5 - 1.3 10 - 1,200 2,869
Summary of Korea EIP Initiative ( 2016)

41. Ulsan Municipality
Ulsan Industrial
Complexes
Ulsan Port
Power Plant
Water Treatment &
Biogas Plant
Landfill Site
Incineration
Plant for
Municipal waste
Sewage
Wastewater
Municipal waste
Industrial
waste
Landfill Gas
Electricity
Electricity
Municipal waste
Industrial
waste
Steam
Products
Imported
Resources
Steam
Steam
Energy
Energy
Food waste
Biogas
Incineration Plant for
Industrial waste
41
VISION of Ulsan Eco-industrial Development: Sustainable City

42. Institutional Arrangement
Continuous improvement

43. ACT ON THE PROMOTION OF THE CONVERSION INTO
ENVIRONMENT- FRIENDLY INDUSTRIAL STRUCTURE
[Enforcement Date 26. Jul, 2017.] [Act No.14839, 26. Jul, 2017., Amendment by
Other Act]
The term "ecological industrial complex" means an industrial complex designated
under Article 21 among industrial complexes defined in subparagraph 8 of Article 2
of the Industrial Sites and Development Act, in order to minimize the burden to
environment and to maximize the efficiency of resources by regenerating the
remnants, such as by-products, etc. generated in the course of manufacture of
products, and wastes into raw materials or energy;

44. CHAPTER IV ESTABLISHMENT OF RESOURCE-
CIRCULATING INDUSTRIAL STRUCTURE
Article 20 (Facilitating Conversion into Resource-Circulating Industrial Structure)
(1) The Minister of Trade, Industry and Energy shall formulate and implement policies to facilitate the
conversion into the resource-circulating industrial structure. <Amended by Act No. 11690, Mar. 23,
2013>
(2) The Minister of Trade, Industry and Energy may perform the following projects to facilitate the
conversion into the resource-circulating industrial structure: <Amended by Act No. 11690, Mar. 23,
2013>
1. Surveys and analysis of overall status of demand for, and supply of, natural resources and renewable
resources;
2. Research and development and standardization to add higher value to natural resources and renewable
resources;
3. Establishing a system to facilitate exchanges of natural resources, renewable resources and energy
among enterprises and evaluating economic feasibility;
4. Invigorating ecological industrial complexes and fostering the remanufacturing industry and the
product servitization industry;
5. Other projects prescribed by Ordinance of the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy to facilitate
conversion into the resource-circulating industrial structure.
(3) Where any institution, organization, enterprise, etc. referred to in Article 6 (2) performs any project
provided for in paragraph (2), the Minister of Trade, Industry and Energy may contribute funds or grant
subsidies necessary therefor, or provide other necessary support. <Amended by Act No. 11690, Mar. 23,
2013>
[This Article Newly Inserted by Act No. 10717, May 24, 2011]

45. Article 21 (Designation, etc. of Ecological Industrial Complexes)
(1) The Minister of Trade, Industry and Energy shall designate ecological industrial complexes through consultation with the
Minister of Environment and the authority to designate industrial complexes provided for in Article 8-2 (1) of the Industrial
Sites and Development Act (hereafter referred to as “authority to designate industrial complexes” in this Article). <Amended by
Act No. 11690, Mar. 23, 2013>
(2) The Minister of Trade, Industry and Energy may perform the following projects with respect to ecological industrial
complexes. In such cases, the Government may contribute funds necessary for performing the relevant projects or provide other
necessary support: <Amended by Act No. 11690, Mar. 23, 2013>
1. Developing and propagating technologies for joint use of resources and energy among enterprises within an ecological
industrial complex;
2. Building up a comprehensive management system of resources and energy within an ecological industrial complex;
3. Training and educating experts in construction of ecological industrial complexes;
4. Cooperation with local communities to construct ecological industrial complexes;
5. Other projects prescribed by Presidential Decree to construct ecological industrial complexes.
(3) The Minister of Trade, Industry and Energy may designate an exclusive organization prescribed by Presidential Decree to
take charge of affairs concerning operation, etc. of ecological industrial complexes. <Amended by Act No. 11690, Mar. 23,
2013>
(4) If necessary for efficiently constructing an ecological industrial complex, the Minister of Trade, Industry and Energy may
request the relevant authority to designate industrial complexes to review an industrial complex development plan to ensure that
major business to be located in the industrial complex, the land utilization plan, and the major infrastructure plan can maximize
efficiency in the use of resources and energy by enterprises located therein when establishing the industrial complex
development plan under Article 6, 7, or 7-2 of the Industrial Sites and Development Act. <Amended by Act No. 11690, Mar. 23,
2013>
(5) Matters necessary for performing projects, methods and procedures for providing support under paragraph (2) and other
matters shall be prescribed by Ordinance of the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy in consultation with the Minister of
Environment. <Amended by Act No. 11690, Mar. 23, 2013>
[This Article Wholly Amended by Act No. 9013, Mar. 28, 2008]
[Moved from Former Article 4-2 <by Act No. 10717, May 24, 2011>]

46. Privatization of EID center
• Ulsan Eco Industrial Development (EID) Centre was established in 2018 to carry out
its role as a sustainable regional base in Ulsan through project promotion for self-
reliance.
• Ulsan EID Centre consists of researchers who participated in the Ulsan EIP project
(2006~2016).
• Ulsan EID Centre has a group of experts involved in EIP related to chemical engineering,
material engineering, mechanical engineering, environmental engineering, resource management,
and energyoptimizationetc.
[ Ulsan EID Centre ]
Board of Directors
MOTIE, Korea
Ulsan Metropolitan
City
Chairman
Executive Director
Secretariat
IS Business
Development Team
IS Technology
Development Team
Expert Group
(Chemical, Material, Mechanical, Environmental, Resource Management, Energy Optimization)

47. Privatization of EID center
• Ulsan EID Centre focuses on finding projects related to supporting
sustainable development of industrial parks by improving infrastructure
efficiency.
• Ulsan EID Centre will secures sustainability by sharing profits generated
through commercialization.
• Ulsan EID Centre is currently carrying out projects in various fields for self-
reliance.
UlsanMetropolitanCity MOTIE
Ulsan Eco Industrial Development Centre
Participatingcompany
fund fund R&D
Targetcompany
Project identification through
Top-down or Bottom-up
approach
Exploring new
networks
Supply chain identification
Review of design and license
Analysis of Accounting
balance
Feasibility study
Company targeted for
commercialization
Securing participating
companies in SPC
Commercialization
Benefit share
Information
Promotion of GHG reduction and recycling project for self-reliance of EID Centre
Revenue
secured
SCP & EPC Joining
Energy bridge project between
industrial complex and community
Industrial renewable energy supply
project based on industrial waste
Sewage effluent reuse project for
sustainability of industrial complex
SPC
(Special purpose company)
Industrial energy supply project base
on incineration heat
Demonstration project of GHG reduction and resource recycling
in industrial park

48. International EIP Cooperation
:Scale-up and mainstreaming

49. 49
7th ISIE Confrence and 10th ISRS in Ulsan, Korea

50. 4
5
2 3 1
6
7
Net1 : 1. Universal jeans (2.47t) → 2. Section seven apparels (1.5t)
Net2 : 1. Universal jeans (2.47t) → 3. Merim (2.0t * 3)
Net3 : 4. Pacific jeans (2.47t) → 5. Univogue garments_unit2 (3.0t)
Net4 : 6. Karnaphuli sportswear (1.5t) → 6. Regency garments_unit3 (1.0t)
Net1
Net2
Net3
Net4
10
11
12
9
8
13
14
Net5
Net6
Net5 : 8. United power generation & distribution (37t) → Crown mills (8,9t), Qualitex (5t*2), Al-hamidi(8t)
Net6 : 8. United power generation & distribution (37t) → Premier towel (8t*2), Siam’s superior (2.5t)
Supplier
Supplier and Receptor
Receptor
Application of
Korean EIP Model
to Low-Carbon
Green CEPZs
Project (IFC, 2012)

51. Transferring Korean Experience to Low Carbon CEPZ
Current energy
consumption of EPZ:
2011
Company to
Company Steam IS
Reduced Energy
Consumption of the
CEPZ: 2015
Additional energy
demand in CEPZ till
2015
Power plant to
Company Steam
IS
Note that the figures are not to scale
~112,044 TOE
~2,865 TOE
~160,055 TOE
~ 65, 201 TOE
17,190 TOE
15.3%
14,325 TOE
►Increase in energy demand is due to the operation of new units. It has been considered only from the
projected electrical energy demand of UPGD (50 MW capacity needed by 2015).
►The Energy IS opportunity includes the steam generation by waste heat recovery from the power
plant and the captive generation companies in CEPZ.

52. An international framework for Eco-Industrial Parks
Joint cooperation
201
3
2019
2015 2017 2018
Time-line of collaboration
Key point: Eco-industrial park model must be a business model based on local context

53. A Practitioner’s Handbook for eco-industrial parks
Structure of the Handbook Key steps for each section
Section
1
Developing a national approach for eco-
industrial parks
• Describes and highlights ways in which the
government and other relevant stakeholders can
support industrial park developers and operators
through institutional, financial and technical support.
Step 1
Engage stakeholders and secure
commitment
Step 2
Diagnostics (technical analysis,
policy and regulatory analysis, and
analysis of financial needs)
Step 3 Develop a national EIP roadmap
Step 4 Launch, monitor and evaluate
Section
2
Implementing the EIP Framework in
industrial parks
• Describes key steps involved in implementing the
International EIP framework at the park level
Step 1 Develop stakeholder commitment
Step 2
Establish an EIP management
team
Step 3 Performance audits
Step 4 Reporting and marketing
(Etienne Kechichian, 2018)

54. Accelerating Eco-Industrial Parks for Inclusive and Sustainable Industrialization
To begin joint projects with IO for EIPs in developing countries
Lessons from the above studies as well as Korean case would be shared for Columbia and Indonesia
Myanma
r
2020, 29 Industries in Yangon
(Proposals for applying Korean EIP models)
Diagnosis
Energy consumption
Waste generation
Analysis
Resource efficiency
Regulation & Finance
Master Plan
Roadmap
Application of EIP model
Promotion
Target countries
Investors
54
4/26/2023
Turkey
2018, EIP Cooperation MOU
(Request for Korean experts)
Malaysia
2017, PIIP and POIC
(Proposals for applying Korean EIP models)
China
2017, EIP Cooperation MOU
(Proposals for applying Korean EIP models)
Bangladesh
2013, Chittagong Industrial Park
(Received, Performance Award from World Bank)
Vietnam
2015, Hoa Khanh Industrial Park
(Request for Korean experts EIP models)
Ethiopia
2020, 2 Industries in Hawassa
(Proposals for applying Korean EIP models)

55. 55
International Center on Eco-industrial Development and EIPs

56. UNIDO International Center for Eco Industrial Development(ICEIPD) will be established
to contribute to eco-industrial park transition and development in emerging and
developing countires with the support of UNIDO. Main project include eco industrial
park transiton/development based on RECP, IS in EIPs and US in Cities to enhance
industrial competitiveness, environmental quality, job creation and sustainable regional
development.
Project Funding &
Policy Supporting
Project Funding &
AdministrativeSupporting
Project Funding
Governance Of Support and Cooperation
IS Project Exploring
& Tech. Supporting
Education &
R&D Involvement
Research &
Information Exchange
Sustainable Business
Management &
Global Cooperation
Project Management
Exploring & Supporting R&DB
about IS Project
Project Development
Development & Distribution of
BM for Developing countries
Education of
Green Industry
KOREA MOTIE
CHINA MIIT
56
UNIDO International Center for
Eco-industrial Park Development Program

57. IMPLEMENTATION STRUCTURE
University of Ulsan
(Host institution)
Project Steering Committee
University of Ulsan, City of Ulsan, ITPO Seoul, UNIDO, and other stakeholders (e.g.
Government/private sector)
International
Consultants
National
Consultants
ITPO
Project Office:
- RECP / EIP Programme Director
- Executive Assistant
- Support Staff
UNIDO
Project Manager
Green Industry and Resource Efficiency Industrial Network(GIREIN)
57
Operational Structure of
UNIDO International Center

58. Takeaways
• EIP needs to be customized to the national, regional contexts
• EIP is an investment, business competitiveness, and
employment strategy
• EIP initiative is recommended to be designed to the minimum
government engagement and maximum private participation
• EIP activities need to be continued till the industrial park’s
operation
• International cooperation need to be accelerated to scale up
and mainstream Eco-industrial development

59. Thank you
For more information on Korean EIP
Contact:
Hung Suck Park
Department of Chemical Engineering
Ulsan College
hspark@ulsan.ac.kr
+81-10-85565611