Lightning Talk - presented to the following stakeholders at various stages: Steering Committee, Library Services, Student Services, Head of Teaching Forum, Head of Academic Schools Forum...
3. Phrases you
will hear
throughout...
GRADUATE ATTRIBUTES
• the core abilities and values a higher education institute
community agrees all its graduates should develop
• abilities employers deem necessary for today’s
knowledge workers
EMPLOYABILITY
• the set of achievements, skills, understandings, and
personal attributes graduates possess upon completion
of a higher education qualification
FRAMEWORK
The conceptual structure we use to organise ideas, facts, and
theory for the research study
HUMAN CAPITAL 'What We Bring'
SOCIAL CAPITAL 'Who We Know'
INDIVIDUAL BEHAVIOURS 'How We Do'
ATTRIBUTES (including graduate attributes) – 'Who We Are'
5. Key deliverables
This T&L initiative aims to develop a shared vision of
employability at DkIT by:
Developing an Institute- wide Employability Statement
and Framework
Developing a model that programme teams can use to
‘employability-proof’ their programmes
Identifying a set of DkIT Graduate Attributes
Creating a DkIT Industry Employability Forum in
collaboration key industry partners
6.
7. Graduate Attributes
Who we are...
Who we are to relevant
audiences...
Who we become...
'An authentic set of
aspirations for all who
attend DkIT...'
What Do Our Employability
Champions Say?
8. Focus Group – Services & Subject Groups
Research &
Graduate
Studies
Lifelong
Learning
Centre
Library
Careers &
Employabilty
Student
Services
SU & Students
Employers CELT
Informatics &
Creative Arts
Business &
Humanities
Engineering
Health &
Science
Professionally
Accredited
Programmes
9. Focus Groups 1-3 • 8 Select 'Employability Champions'
• 12 Open EE Theme Questions
• Use literature review to identify Best Practice
EE Themes for Open Questions
• Use Institute and National Forum Documents
to identify EE and Graduate Attribute Themes
for Open Questions
• Use Graduate Survey Data to identify Themes
for Open Questionevelop a Cascading
Protocol for each theme to engage with Pilot
Participants, should Prototypical Themes
emerge indicative of Categories or Items
relevant to next stages...
• Use Microsoft Teams for One-2-One or
Groups of 2-3..
Method & Procedure
SAMPLE:
10+ 'Employability Champions' Group 1
8-10 School & Support Staff Group 2
Specific Sets of 4-6 people Group 3
[Health, Employers, Students], Ongoing
Materials [Email Correspondence,
Information Sheet, and Interviewer Protocol]
6 Themes and 1-5 Questions per Theme
Interviews Via Microsoft Teams
[Camera Off re Ethics Consultation]
Scoring Key PDF
10. Focus Group 1-3 • 8 Select 'Employability Champions'
• 12 Open EE Theme Questions
• Use literature review to identify Best Practice
EE Themes for Open Questions
• Use Institute and National Forum Documents
to identify EE and Graduate Attribute Themes
for Open Questions
• Use Graduate Survey Data to identify Themes
for Open Questionevelop a Cascading
Protocol for each theme to engage with Pilot
Participants, should Prototypical Themes
emerge indicative of Categories or Items
relevant to next stages...
• Use Microsoft Teams for One-2-One or
Groups of 2-3..
Method & Procedure
Transcribed and Segmented
Developed Scoring Key
Presently Coding
Protocol Booklet [Watch SG Teams]
Now in the Results Write-Up Stage
Preliminary Results Ready re Graduate
Attributes
ü Executive Summary – Focus Group
Research Report PDF underway (with
graphs and infographics)
12. Graduate Attributes –
Preliminary Questions
Attribute Cataloguing
• What graduate attributes are
mentioned and how many unique
mentions were found?
• How many mentions relate to
capstone graduate attributes?
• Are there any new capstone
graduate attributes emerging?
Emerging Values Frameworks
• Is there a Values piece emerging
from the residual graduate
attributes?
13.
14. (n = 347)
62 (18%)
25 (7%)
32 (9%)
30 (9%)
11 (3%)
22 (6%)
165 (47%)
*Rounding up will take
place when count ceases...
15. Emerging Mindsets
Consensus on Qualities
PAR
Mindset 1 – Positive Attitude
Mindset 2 – Adaptable
Mindset 3 – Resilient
Survey Results - All Stakeholder Groups Choose Top
1-3 Qualities for Mindset Questions (n = 280+)
16. Graduate Attributes – Starting Hypotheses
Wireframe CTCC or CTCC
Communicative
• Digital Fluency
• Technology-Enhanced
Learning
• Impactful Communicating
Technical
• Analytical Thinking
• Data Fluency
• Operationally Savvy
• Ethical in Technology
Confident
• Professional Confidence
• Adaptable/Flexible/Resilient
• Work Readiness
• Lifelong Learning
• Critical Thinking
Collaborative
• Teamworking
• Networking
• Solutions-Driven
• Innovative
18. Composite Capstone – The Competition Logic
PRACTICAL TECHNICAL
ENTERPRISING
NFQ Professions-Led Degree
Programmes (Table 1, SC Meeting 3
for Interchangeable Term Use)
e.g. TECHNOLOGY-DRIVEN
NFQ Professions-Led Certificate and
Degree Programmes (e.g.,
Engineering)
NFQ Certificate and Degree
Programmes (e.g., Hospitality)
A. 3 Research Clusters are guided by the application of technology to health, engineering, and enterprise.
B. New technology uptake and associated technical skill training guides graduate development across the institute.
19. Nominal and Proportionate
Threshold Counts per Capstone
and Sub-Attributes
Our 'Who I am' Capstones
• Collaborative
• Technology-Driven or Technical
• Communicative
• Confident
Overlapping and Distinct Sub-
Attributes Options
• Technology-Driven [Add
Competitor Capstone
'Enterprising' and 'Practical' as
Sub-Attributes]
21. DkIT's Model of Graduate Employability
Human Capital
Skills
Competencies
Work Experience
Social Capital
University Ranking
Networks
Social Class
Career Mindset
Career Self-Management
Career Building Skills
Attributes
Graduate Attributes
Individual Traits
Perceived
Employability
Graduate Employability
Individual Employability
Career Outcomes
'Micro' Labour Market
DkIT Partnerships
Alumni
DkIT Supports
'Macro' Labour Market
Supply Factors
Demand Factors
Adapted from Clarke 2018: 1931
22. Forecasted
Embedding
Employability
Process
• A framework for embedding
employability at a programmatic
level.
• A web-based suite of resources to
help staff enhance employability
through assessment.
• A more expansive activities
database based on the
initial resources suite.
23. Best Practice Examples
• Industry-Partnered Assessment
• DELTA Awards
• Guest Speaker Reflective Practice Assignments
• Mandatory Placements with Industry Partners
• CA includes a LinkedIn profile, revisited regularly
• Students work on a project for employers
• Students research employers they'd like to work for
• A life-skills and well-being module
Click here for Proofing Tabulation.
24. Embedding Employability in the
Curriculum – Working Ideas
Employability in Curriculum
o 10*/dot/tick Employability Matrix
One-Stop Accessible Resource
o Best Practice Exemplars
o Toolkit Piece or Staff Workshops
Tutorials - Suite of Content
o Delivery: Careers Services
Module or Award...
26. SURVEY RESULT – GRADUATE ATTRIBUTE HEADLINE
GROUP PRACTICAL ENTERPRISING TECHNICAL TECHNOLOGY
DRIVEN
TOTAL OTHER
STUDENT 57 20 33 16 126 0
GRADUATE 38 22 15 22 97 3
STAFF 54 17 12 13 96 4
EMPLOYER 22 4 10 1 37 1
171 63 70 52 356 8
48% 18% 20% 14% 98% 2%
Survey Preference Vote
1st Place = Practical
2nd Place = Technical
3rd Place = Enterprising
4th Place = Technology-Driven
Focus Group Vote
Technical – Fourth Capstone
Survey Popular/Head Count Vote
52% = Aggregate of other 3 Capstones
27. Conclusion
What sort of Graduates?
• T & 3Cs
• Collaborative, Communicative,
Confident and Technology-Driven
What kind of Changemakers?
The 'implementers' rather than
'philosophers'
Our Graduates' Employability...
• A Local to Global Lens
Next Steps
• Our Employability Survey –
Institute Wide and to all Stakeholders
Conclusion
28. Conclusion
Funded by the National Forum
for the Enhancement of
Teaching & Learning in HE
Recording via Teams for
Stream
Notes de l'éditeur
Welcome! Thank you for the invitation to speak with you all today. This afternoon I will present the preliminary focus group findings from our Embedding Employability project, funded National Forum for the Enhancement of Teaching & Learning in Higher Education. We are very excited about the project and its prospects to improve our understanding of the student experience and enhance their prospects of employability, both in the now and for their future, especially in a pandemic-era labour market.
We will shortly record this presentation via Microsoft Teams and Stream, but today it will be just us and the team here for the Registrar's Office.
Before we move to the overview, there are some phrases you will hear throughout...
Just to give you an overview of what we will present to you today... First we will introduce you to the Embedding Employability project with our planned key deliverables. Next, we will turn to our Focus Group research presently engaging staff, employers, students and industry in a shared university-wide discussion of employability best practice.
We will briefly present a taster of our emerging research on a Graduate Attribute Framework for DkIT and talk you through an emerging DkIT-specific Employability Framework. Finally, we will open to the floor for discussion.
So, our key deliverables – Read from slide.
First we turn to our research project designed to create a DkIT bespoke Graduate Attribute Framework. Much like all universities, and in light of moving towards a TU status in the coming years, having a graduate attribute framework is important because it draws on a consensus to speak of our identity and the aspirations we have for our students and particularly our graduates upon leaving us to commence their working lives.
Graduate attributes from a DkIT student perspective communicates who we are, who we are to relevant audiences, and who we become. A graduate attribute framework is useful not only because it provides a marketing apparatus to gain the attention of employers and prospective students, but a promise to our students regarding the authentic set of aspirations possible for all who attend DkIT, to help them survive and thrive in the real world.
What's more, our Strategic Plan demands attention to the drawing up of this framework to unify, improve and guide our employability practices to remain competitive. 94% of our graduates achieve employment in their first year upon graduation and we want to maintain this momentum.
We designed a piece of research to set about uncovering what graduate attributes best fit this promise and realisation for DkIT. And who better to ask than our 'Employability Champions', those hard working staff and industry partners who promote DkIT workplace skills and employability at every opportunity.
We choose a focus group model for our research. Due to Covid restrictions we were confined to interviews using Microsoft Teams, but you can see from this slide that this did not stop us reaching every corner of the institute, to give voice to every set of student services and subject groups, from lecturer to Heads of Schools and Directors of Services...
Refer to each diagram on slide.
For your interest, and to assure you of the validity and reliability of our research, have briefly outlined the method on the next two slides.
Refer to the bullet points on slide, and ask them should they wish they can see the scoring key to find out what categories and themes we were looking to measure and collate.
Refer to slide bullet points under Method and Procedure.
And, we have a Focus Group Collection Booklet, a Graduate Attribute Framework document and Executive Summary underway while we complete the remainder of focus groups.
So, what did we find? We found that our DkIT Graduate Attribute Framework looks very similar to other models presently popular in the UK, namely the Changemakers Model. This model values the dynamic and modern nature of the world that our graduates and their skills find themselves in the minute they graduate. We will show you how this is so in a few slides, but for now let's take a look at the research questions we asked.
Refer to slide only. Then say and now to some slides showing our preliminary findings.
This slide represents the % of Capstone Mentions per Focus Group Total (that is the 25 people who have participated so far), and Focus Group 1 (the group of Employability Champions excluding the subject group lecturers, professions clusters, employers and student voice which are underway.
You can see that 6 competing capstones emerged when counting unique mentions per participant. In the blue and green we have all 25 thus far. Working clockwise from noon you can see that Collaborative, Communicate and Confident graduate attributes are mentioned near on or above 80%.
However, Technical, Enterprising and Practical are mentioned between 40-60% of the time. Moreover, you can see that the same pattern occurs for Focus Group 1 re our Employability Champions.
None of these three really constitute a fourth graduate attribute capstone in and of themselves, and we are looking for four capstones and five sub-attributes each. So, just bear that in mind as we move to the next slide.
And here we have a volume analysis. So, of the 347 graduate attributes thus far mentioned we see the following percentages of the Total Number of Graduate Attribute Mentions.
Working clockwise from noon once again, you can see that … Now say the count and each coolour. Again we have competition between Enterprising, Technical and Practical emergent. So, even the volume analysis shows a similar result to our previous roundtable unique-mention per person result. We're 2/3 of the way through, so this is encouraging.
Note that almost half of the mentions referred to Personal Attributes in the navy colour. We looking at a values, or mindset analysis of this data as it does not fit the other categories clearly. You can ask more questions about this later.
Next we shall take a look at how these findings impacted our initial model.
This slide shows the BEFORE model, which was drafted from a literature review, graduate surveys such as ISSE, GOS and AHECS, and the experiential intuitions of our Steering Committee.
Name the Capstones...
And now we have the revised model, and we see that TECHNICAL is giving us problems. Remember it has similar results to ENTERPRISING and in a fine-grained analysis that we completed it both competes with and is used interchangeably with PRACTICAL. Therefore we came up with a synthetic capstone; a composite of all 3 under the title TECHNOLOGY-DRIVEN! You can tell us about that in the discussion in a slide or two.
And, now we come to that Changemakers Model. Originating in Hull University and worked out here in the visual by researchers at Northampton University...
Much like theirs our Confidence capstone and its sub-attributes it matches their Self-Direction capstone.
Much like their Collaboration capstone, our Collaborative capstone and sub-attributes appear.
Much like their Change capstone and sub-attributes, our Communicative capstone and sub-attributes are similar.
Now, where we differ is in that fourth capstone... Where they denote ethical and integrity values, we have a fourth substantial capstone TECHNOLOGY-DRIVED. In a sense we are the Do-ers whereas, they are the Philosophers. And rightly so, we are an Institute of Technology after all.
So, how does all of this promote and relate to our employability?
Three P's inspired by Holmes, L. 2013. “Competing Perspectives on Graduate Employability: Possession, Position or Process?” Studies in Higher Education 38 (4): 538–554. 'Personality' is my best guess at a fourth –JH.
Just to conclude – Talk through slide.
So, where does all of that lead us in our search to maximise our employability as an institute?
What sort of Graduates are we nurturing? Are their attributes in line with what employers want – Absolutely, the overlap with AHECS is almost point on point, and our research with the broadest and most open design has evidence-based that we are doing and will continue to do better at making this synergy between graduate and employer ever stronger.
Thank you for your attention today. I will now open to the floor to take your questions....