James Tourle reviewed several nature photos and made minor edits to some using Photoshop. For the wasp photo, he increased vibrance and curves to make it more colorful. The berries photo was made black and white except for the red berries. He adjusted the color of one flower to purple. Two photos were left unedited as they looked good already. A questionnaire asks for feedback on the photos, including ratings for each, comments on good and bad photos, and general comments.

1. Questionnaire
By James Tourle

3. Wasp
For this picture I altered the vibrance and curves on
photoshop, in an attempt to make the wasp more colourful
and stand out more as it was quite dull in the original image.

4. Berries
For this picture I made the majority of it black and white but left
the berries red, because it was a skill I already knew how to do
and I wanted to use it.

5. Flower 1 (Unedited)
I didn't edit this photo at all because I felt it was one of my best
looking photos whilst I was reviewing them and wondering how
to make them better.

6. Flower 2
For this photo I adjust the colour of the flower itself to a purple colour
as the original yellow colour didn't appeal to me too much.

7. Flower 3 (Unedited)
I also decided not to edit this photo at all as it looked
quite nice to me and I didn't think it needed any editing.

8. Flower 4
For my final picture I did a tiny amount of editing (adjusting
the hue and vibrancy) that is not obvious when compared to
the original.

9. Questions
• What was your favourite photo?
• My favourite photo was:
• On a scale from 1 to 5 how would you rate each photo?
• Wasp = /5, Berries = /5, Flower 1 = /5, Flower 2 = /5, Flower
3 = /5, Flower 4 = /5
• Would you go to see this in a gallery?
• If it was in a gallery:
• What photos did you think were good/bad and in what
way?
• I think:
• Any general comments about the photos as a whole?