Monitoring result for Wuyi Runhu Metal Product
Co., Ltd on site Wuyi Runhu Metal Product Co., Ltd
Monitoring
Monitored Party : Wuyi Runhu Metal Product Co., Ltd
amfori ID : 156-022309-000
Site : Wuyi Runhu Metal Product Co., Ltd
Site amfori ID : 156-022309-002
Address : No.10, Weier West Road, Tongqin Town, Wuyi County
: Jinhua
: Zhejiang Sheng
: China
Monitoring Activity : amfori Social Audit - Manufacturing
Monitoring Type : Full Monitoring
Submission Date : 20/06/2022
Expiration Date : 20/06/2023

This is an extract of the online monitoring result, generated on 22/06/2022, and is only valid as
an acknowledgement of the result. To see all the details, review the full monitoring result, which is
available here - The English version is the legally binding one.
amfori does not assume any liability with regard to the compliance of this extract, or any versions of this extract, with the Regulation (EU) 2016/679
(General Data Protection Regulation).
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, translated, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any
means electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, be lent, re-sold, hired out or otherwise circulated without the amfori consent.
© amfori, 2021
Overall rating
A B C D E None
Section rating
PA1: Social Management System C
PA 2: Workers Involvement and Protection A
PA 3: The Rights of Freedom of Association and Collective Bargaining A
PA 4: No Discrimination A
PA 5: Fair Remuneration B
PA 6: Decent Working Hours D
PA 7: Occupational Health and Safety A
PA 8: No Child Labour A
PA 9: Special Protection for Young Workers A
-
1
/

PA 10: No Precarious Employment A
PA 11: No Bonded Labour A
PA 12: Protection of the Environment A
PA 13: Ethical Business Behaviour A
-
2
/

General description
The auditee was located at No.10, Weier West Road, Tongqin Town, Wuyi County, Jinhua, Zhejiang, China / 中国浙江省⾦华
市武义县桐琴镇五⾦机械⼯业园区纬⼆西路10号. Total 3 buildings approx. 15700㎡ were within boundary owned by auditee.
One 7-storey building was used as office and dormitory. One 1-storey building was used as canteen. One 5-storey building
was used as production and warehouse. The auditee was specialised in water bottle, plastic mug manufacturing and the main
production processing including: metal processing, welding, polishing, paint spraying, silk-screen printing, plastic spraying,
assembling and packing. No finished products subcontractor was used and all employees were hired directly by auditee. The
peak or low season for production was not obvious. Good cooperation was conducted between auditor and auditee such as
auditor could take photos onsite and independent office was provided for workers interview. The onsite CAP was signed by the
auditee representative and auditor without opposed comment.
Remark:
1. The name of auditee in English showed in the foreign trade operator registration form was 'No.10, Weier West Road, Tongqin
Town, Wuyi County, Jinhua, Zhejiang'. The name of auditee in English in the business license should be 'No.10, Weier West
Road, Hardware&machinery Industrial Park, Tongqin Town, Wuyi County, Jinhua, Zhejiang'. They indicated same location
and as confirmed by auditee management that they preferred to using 'No.10, Weier West Road, Tongqin Town, Wuyi County,
Jinhua, Zhejiang' in the audit report.
2. No government waivers or collective bargaining agreements was maintained by this factory. No labor agency or contractor
was used by the factory, thus, no labor agency contract or contractor license was applicable. So these documents were not
uploaded to the platform.
3. Auditor's name: Michael Sun. APSCA registration number: CSCA 21701859. Auditing company: TUV Rheinland, APSCA
Number:11600007.
-
3
/

Site Details
Site : Wuyi Runhu Metal Product Co., Ltd
Site amfori ID : 156-022309-002
GICS Classification
Sector : Consumer Discretionary
Industry Group : Consumer Durables & Apparel
Industry : Household Durables
Sub Industry : Housewares & Specialties
amfori Process Classifications GS1 Classifications
N.A. N.A.
NACE Classification Water Stress Situation
N.A. N.A.
-
4
/

Metrics
Key Metrics
Total workforce 162 Workers
Legal minimum wage in local currency 1840 Monthly
Lowest wage paid for regular work at the site 2300 Monthly
Calculated living wage in local currency 2403 Monthly
Total sample 16 Workers
Other Metrics
Male workers 83 Workers
Female workers 79 Workers
Permanent workers - Male 83 Workers
Permanent workers - Female 79 Workers
Temporary workers - Male 0 Workers
Temporary workers - Female 0 Workers
Seasonal workers - Male 0 Workers
Seasonal workers - Female 0 Workers
Management - Male 3 Workers
Management - Female 2 Workers
Apprentices - Male 0 Workers
Apprentices - Female 0 Workers
Workers on probation - Male 0 Workers
Workers on probation - Female 0 Workers
Workers with night shift - Male 8 Workers
Workers with night shift - Female 17 Workers
Workers with disabilities - Male 0 Workers
Workers with disabilities - Female 0 Workers
Domestic migrant workers - Male 74 Workers
Domestic migrant workers - Female 72 Workers
Foreign migrant workers - Male 0 Workers
Foreign migrant workers - Female 0 Workers
Workers hired directly - Male 83 Workers
Workers hired directly - Female 79 Workers
Workers hired indirectly - Male 0 Workers
Workers hired indirectly - Female 0 Workers
Unionised workers - Male 0 Workers
Unionised workers - Female 0 Workers
Workers under CBA - Male 0 Workers
Workers under CBA - Female 0 Workers
Pregnant workers 0 Workers
Workers on parental leave - Male 0 Workers
Workers on parental leave - Female 0 Workers
Sample - Male 8 Workers
Sample - Female 8 Workers
-
5
/

Findings
PA1: Social Management System
It was noted that the factory had written management procedures to implement amfori BSCI Code of Conduct, such as protect
environment, HS management, etc.. However, not all of the policies were implemented effectively. Such as how to supervise
and control workers' monthly overtime(exceeded 36 hours in 3 sampled months for sampled workers: July 2021, Dec. 2021 and
Apr. 2022) and insurance was not covered all applicable workers. Interviewees claimed that social insurance and overtime was
voluntary to choose.
评估中发现⼯⼚建⽴了确保amfori BSCI⾏为守则有效实施的管理程序，⽐如保护环境、健康安全等。然⽽，不是所有的政策
都被有效的实施。 ⽐如：如何监控员⼯的⽉加班（抽样员⼯抽样3个⽉加班时间超过了36个⼩时:2021年07⽉，2021年12⽉和
2022年04⽉）和社会保险没有覆盖所有适⽤⼈员。被访谈员⼯表⽰社保加班是⾃愿选择的。
It was noted that the factory had established cost accounting and capacity planning procedure. However, it was not
implemented effectively which led to the monthly overtime hours exceeded legal requirement(exceeded 36 hours in 3 sampled
months for sampled workers: July 2021, Dec. 2021 and Apr. 2022).
评估中发现⼯⼚有建⽴成本核算和产量计划程序。但是没有有效实施以致于⽉加班时间超过法规 要求（抽样员⼯抽样3个⽉加
班时间超过了36个⼩时:2021年07⽉，2021年12⽉和2022年04⽉）。
PA 2: Workers Involvement and Protection
It was noted that the factory did not conduct the regular survey on the written procedure for the grievance mechanism. Remark:
The suggestion box and worker representative was available in the factory. Based on records review, no grievance was reported
since May 2021.
评估中发现⼯⼚没有针对书⾯申诉机制程序进⾏定期评审。备注：⼯⼚有意⻅箱以及员⼯代表。通过记录查阅，从2021年05
⽉份以来⽆申诉发⽣。
PA 5: Fair Remuneration
It was noted that total 162 employees included 24 workers(not required for social insurance as per law requirement) retired back
to work, 138 employees should buy social insurance. The social insurance receipt from May 2021 to Apr. 2022 were provided
for review, the social insurance receipt of Apr. 2022 showed that the factory did not provide social insurance(endowment
insurance, medical insurance, unemployment insurance, maternity insurance) for 127 out of 138 employees who should buy
social insurance, did not provide work-related injury insurance 81 out of 138 workers. The factory management claimed that
most workers had bought local agricultural insurance. Most interviewed workers claimed that they had bought local agricultural
insurance. (Law and Regulation: Social Insurance Law of the People's Republic of China, Article 10, 23, 33, 44 and 53. Remark:
The factory had not recorded the number of workers participated in local agricultural insurance.
评估中发现共162名员⼯中包括24名退休返聘⼈员（根据法规要求不需要缴纳社保），138名员⼯应该购买社会保险。2021年
05⽉⾄2022年04⽉社保缴费记录提供查阅， 2022年04⽉社保记录显⽰⼯⼚没有给138名应该缴纳社会保险的员⼯中的127名
员⼯缴纳社会保险（养⽼、医疗、失业和⽣育保险），没有给81名员⼯购买⼯伤保险。管理层表⽰⼤多数员⼯购买了当地农
村保险。⼤多数被访谈员⼯表⽰购买了当地农村保险。（参考法律法规《中华⼈⺠共和国社会保险法》第⼗条、⼆⼗三条、三
⼗三条、四⼗四条、五⼗三条） 。备注：⼯⼚没有统计购买农保的⼈数。
PA 6: Decent Working Hours
It was noted that the attendance records from May 2021 to Jun. 10, 2022 were provided for review, 16 sampled workers'
monthly OT hours had exceeded 36 hours 3 sampled months. Maximum monthly overtime were 94 hours in July 2021.
(Laws and Regulations: China Labor Law, Article 41) (1) Through reviewing the attendance records in July 2021, 16 selected
employees' monthly overtime hours were within 40 to 94 hours; (2) Through reviewing the attendance records in Dec. 2021,
16 selected employees' monthly overtime hours were within 78 to 86 hours; (3) Through reviewing the attendance records
in Apr. 2022, 16 selected employees' monthly overtime hours were within 80 to 81.5 hours; Remark: Maximum monthly
overtime arranged for sampled workers from Jun. 01, 2022 to Jun. 10, 2022 were 12 hours. The factory had established
written procedure regarding working time management. However, it was not implemented effectively. As claimed by factory
management that the attendance system had no alert when overtime hours exceeded the limitation.
评估中发现⼯⼚2021年05⽉⾄2022年06⽉10⽇的考勤记录提供查阅，16名抽样员⼯⽉加班时间在抽样3个⽉超过了36个⼩
时，最多⽉加班在2021年07⽉份达到了94个⼩时。（参考法律法规：《中华⼈⺠共和国劳动法》第41条）。 (1)通过查阅
2021年07⽉16名抽样员⼯考勤显⽰⽉加班在40⾄94⼩时之间； (2)通过查阅2021年12⽉16名抽样员⼯考勤显⽰⽉加班在78⾄
86⼩时之间； (3)通过查阅2022年04⽉16名抽样员⼯考勤显⽰⽉加班在80⾄81.5⼩时之间； 备注：抽样⼯⼈中从2022年6⽉1
⽇⾄2022年6⽉10⽇最多的⽉加班为12⼩时。已经建⽴了书⾯的⼯作时间管理程序, 然⽽没有有效的实施，管理层表⽰当加班
时间超出限制时考勤系统没有警⽰功能。
-
6
/

PA 7: Occupational Health and Safety
(1) It was noted that the factory did not conduct the occupational hazards factors testing, such as chemical in paint spraying,
dust in welding area and noise in metal processing area. The factory management claimed that they did not conduct it as
consideration of cost control. Reference law: Provisions on the Administration of Workplace Occupational Health Article 20. (2) It
was noted that the factory did not provide the pre-job and post-service occupational diseases examination for workers exposed
to occupational hazards position. (e.g. welding workers exposed to dust, paint spraying worker exposed to chemical and metal
processing worker exposed to noise etc.) . The on-job occupational diseases examination was provided. Reference law: Law of
the People‘s Republic of China on Prevention and Control of Occupational Diseases, Article 35.
(1)评估中发现⼯⼚没有委托进⾏职业危害因素检测。例如喷漆区域的化学品、焊接区域的粉尘和⾦加⼯区域的噪⾳检测。管
理层表⽰没有做是出于成本控制考虑。参考法律法规：《⼯作场所职业卫⽣管理规定》第20条 (2)评估中发现⼯⼚未给接触职
业病危害⼯种的⼈员的岗前和离岗体检。（如：接触粉尘的焊接⼯⼈、接触化学品喷漆区域的⼯⼈和接触噪⾳的⾦加⼯⼯⼈
等），已经提供了在岗的职业健康体检。参考法律法规：《中华⼈⺠共和国职业病防治法》第35条
It was noted that the factory did not provide any injury insurance for 105 out of 162 employees(162 employees including 24
workers retired back to work). Work-related injury management procedure was established and no related case happened
before according written records. (Laws and Regulations: Occupation Disease Prevention Law of P.R.C, Article 7)
评估中发现⼯⼚没有给162名中的105名（162名员⼯包括24名退休返聘⼈员）员⼯缴纳任何⼯伤保险。⼯⼚已经针对⼯伤管
理建⽴了书⾯的程序，根据书⾯记录显⽰未发⽣过⼯伤事故。参考法律法规：《中华⼈⺠共和国职业病防治法》第7条
It was noted that the one moulding worker was not wearing safety shoes during operation which were provided by the factory.
(Laws and Regulations: Work Safety Law of the People's Republic of China, Article 45)
评估中发现⼀名模具⼯⼈作业时没有穿⼯⼚提供的安全鞋。（参考法律法规：《中华⼈⺠共和国安全⽣产法》第45条）
It was noted that the chemicals in the chemical warehouse were not provided with secondary container, such as diluent.
Reference law: Regulation for Safety of Hazardous Chemical, Article 20
评估中发现化学品仓库的化学品没有⼆次容器，例如稀释剂。参考法规：《危险化学品安全管理条例》 第⼆⼗条
It was noted that the factory did not retain food samples in the canteen. Approx. 120 workers had meal in the canteen.
Reference Law: catering and mass meal delivery hygiene requirement article 35
评估中发现⼯⼚没按要求把⻝堂的⻝品进⾏留样。⼤约有120名⼯⼈在⻝堂就餐。相关法律法规：《餐饮业和集体⽤餐配送单
位卫⽣规范》 第三⼗五条
PA 12: Protection of the Environment
(1) It was noted that the factory did not monitor waste gas generated from plastic injection, welding and paint spraying area
regularly. Reference law: Measures for the Administration of Environmental Surveillance , Article 21 (2) It was noted that
the factory didn't monitor its boundary noise level to comply with the requirement of law. Reference law:Law of the People's
Republic of China on Prevention and Control of Pollution From Environmental Noise , Article 23
(1) 评估中发现⼯⼚未定期监测注塑、焊接和喷漆区域产⽣的废⽓排放。参考法律法规：《环境监测管理办法》第21条 (2) 评
估中发现⼯⼚没有监测其⼚界噪⾳状况以确保其排放符合其法规的要求。参考法律法规：《中华⼈⺠共和国环境噪声污染防治
法》 第23条
-
7
/