1) The document discusses issues around privacy and data collection from smart devices and discusses a court case about the "Internet of Shit". 2) It notes that devices can betray users by collecting and sharing their data without consent in ways that users may not be aware of. 3) Finally, it calls for greater transparency from device manufacturers and authorities around what data is collected from devices, access to that data, and for authorities to support strong encryption rather than backdoors into systems and devices.

1. The Internet of Shit
Goes to Court
re:publica 2017
Millie Graham Wood | Frederike Kaltheuner
@milliegw | @fre8de8rike

10. The Internet of Shit goes to court
Part I

22. Your devices are betraying you
Part II

25. Informational asymmetry

32. Unequal access

36. Denver Police Department (2017)
training bulletin Cellebrite Universal Forensic Extraction Device

37. Transparency report, Google Nest

38. Accuracy & reliability

42. What we need to do
Part III

48. We need to know what the police are obtaining and other authorities when
they access our device
We need to have awareness of smart devices we don't know about
We need manufacturers to be honest about what can be collected, what is
being collected and where it's going.
If the police / border control are extracting data off our devices we need to
understand that.
We need authorities to back strong encryption and stop calling for back doors
if they are going to be keeping all this data.
We need to think about privacy by design and product liability

49. We need to understand the limitations, anad fallacies of electronic evidence.

50. Millie Graham Wood | Frederike Kaltheuner
@milliegw | @fre8de8rike