energy, earth, earth-rotation, moon-earth, gravity, climate-change, psychics, tsunami, nuclear, fukushima, nuclear-plant, meltdown, earthquake, nuclear-crisis, nuclear-danger, nuclear-reactor, orbit, power, alternative-energy, green-energy

1. What we wear and we know not the best
The political, social or scientific prevailing are not always the most efficient, or produce the
better results for humanity in reducing poverty, maintaining peace or improving the health of
mankind. Even the world's most prestigious universities are often funded by business interests.
Consider the case presented in the 2011 Oscar winning of best documentary, he analyzes the
actions of several members from Treasure and Federal Reserve, guilty of dubious decisions,
who were economists from Harvard University and the University of Chicago. His "advice"
such as deregulation of the banking system led to the financial collapse of 2008. The Economic
neo-liberal science, who currently recognizes as parents to Adam Smith, Von Hayek and Milton
Friedman in particular going through a crisis that will be difficult to recover. The recent book
“Shock Doctrine” by Naomi Klein shows that this type of thinking through history is introduced
and adopted in countries almost never in a democratic way, but take advantage of crisis
situations like political tension, wars or natural disasters. Such ideas are turned into dogmas and
defended tooth and nail by "influential intellectuals" embedded in government the same way as
with Marxist ideas in their heyday. Neither of these two systems has failed to solve economic
problems.
Quoting the author Jeffrey Grupp when talking about the poor application of the theory of
supply and demand in international markets when the prices are controlled as in the case of the
price of oil. Walter Graziano economist Adam Smith also questioned economist Adam Smith
when confronted with the game theory of John Nash the Nobel Prize or parts where players
tested did not choose the most favorable option for each one but the second best wich doesn’t
harm my interest and the others interests too much. Instead Smith's theory is based on
searching only my best interest. Thinking of great individuals through history, it is logical for
true human nature not to be always selfish but sometimes altruistic too, although the current
system makes us believe otherwise.
The same thing happens in other sciences and scientific disciplines. The case of medicine is
typical. Dr. Grishlane Lancout in her book Medical Mafia, states that the "medicine of the
disease ”dominates over " health Medicine ", in the first case normally the disease is always
seen as caused by an outside invader, an enemy of the body contrary to what she calls health
medicine where the disease is seen as a warning of the body that something is wrong, even as an
"ally." It is simply an imbalance that occurs in the cells of our body and mind when we treat
them badly. We follow the Western dualistic way of thinking, black and white, good-bad to
which we are accustomed as a result of wars, conflicts, ideological, religious, paradigms of
political parties, class struggles, etc.
According to Dr. Lacout this conflict occurs in the history of science to be regarded as
sacrosanct, the theory of Louis Pasteur, who identified the microorganisms as malignant
external agents. Pasteur is regarded as an icon and a respected scientist, while the theory of
Becalm, who proposed that microorganisms are internal and diseased body when an imbalance
occurs, fell into oblivion.
Now continue reviewing other scientific disciplines, the father of psychology is Sigmund Freud.
The psychoanalysis analyzes subconscious mind to find the root of the problem and fight it,
these conflicts are caused only by desires of the senses, this led him to break ties with the Swiss
psychologist Carl Jung who differed completely from this to consider religious and spiritual life
as a force for transforming the mind.
In political science Morgenthau realism, where the power is handled based on interests rather
than based on ethical considerations imposed on the idealism that seeks to benefit the

2. sovereignty of countries and the great masses of humanity. The political parties participating in
the game of alternating in power thanks to the dogma of left and right paradigm to stay there
without producing substantive changes favoring the common good, being the clearest example
the USA Democratic and Republican parties.
Now, in the world of finances, using the current banking system whose base is the money
without backing or real value, the banker is allowed to lend this “money” creating a perpetual
debt within system that favors all kinds of speculative and inflation practices without really
producing anything or service anyone and causing great damage to the economy. Privatizing
profits and socializing the losses is the unjust norm. Clearly not the best system. The banks
should instead be developing engines for moving unused capital where no one exists and can be
invested.
In the field of communications, the news and entertainment corporations have to make sure that
the content does not oppose the consumption habits, they service the client, the advertiser, they
need to “fit” their vision of the way “normal” humans behave and think.. The art of quality or
complaint is rarely presented in media. The news is presented without any real objectivity,
journalism becoming a propaganda to serve the interests of media owners who normally are
infiltrating politics. This we see as like half of all media turns systematically against
government, they can do nothing right, ever (that’s easy in because the kind of corruption in
Latin-American countries. The opposite is true too, they become "cheerleaders" of it or
constantly creating “little disputes" to give the appearance of opposition. The first is true in
countries like Venezuela, in the official media and the second is true in countries like the Unites
States. Objectivity and real proposal are relegated to alternative media.
The most beneficial and efficient inventions and their inventors have also received this insane
treatment. In the field of electricity is famous "Battle of AC / DC" like the famous rock group,
between Edison and Tesla where even if the best option because it was the least expensive,
subsequent investigations to transmit wireless electricity Tesla failed followed by the employer
JP Morgan who withdrew funding, realizing it wasn’t possible to collect money from the users.
Tesla himself said in life that the world was not ready for such advances.
The electric car was the best option was sold in the market for vehicles in the year 1915 but was
recalled by the Ford Company to prefer fossil fuels and because the car had some problems that
had been solved today. Thereafter inventors from small workshops have received the Tesla
treatment, researching and refining the prototypes and final product. There have been some
timid attempts to introduce in the market but is always seen as a novelty and is not true will of
the big companies taking the plunge manufacturers, the exception being the company " Tesla
Motors Roadster and Toyota produces now an amazing electric vehicle but its price is too high
to become a vehicle for mass use. China is the country that leads the world in the use of electric
vehicles especially two-wheelers scooters a surprising number of 65.000 around the streets of
Chinese cities." pag.196 power hungry, Robert Bryce, 2010, public affairs, persseus book
group, new York
We are accustomed to thinking this way Western dualistic opposites, enemies, instead of
competing human humans living in harmony. We are worried about my ego, my profits, my
truth, my dogmas etc.
As professionals we are also taught to think certain way, basing our identity in the profession
we’re in. We think about my Career , my Titles, my Professional reputation, my group of
intellectuals, we're terrified of isolation, of losing our jobs or put in ridicule.
For these reasons, as we have seen is hard to go more to spread Pasteur than Becalm, John Nash
more than Adam Smith, Jung more than Freud, Edison more than Tesla, etc. The most
profitable industries, just by logic hold politically and domain of world public opinion and
academia. The oil industry, big Pharma along with the processed food industry need to

3. influence universities, major media and by extent public opinion. Even the eco industry that has
already achieved a position of considerable power to change ideas dogmatic or start using
energy options such as electric cars, or new energy research as georotacional, but they pursued
his own “alternative energy” agenda which has already obtained large subsides from rich
countries governments.
International agencies stand by solutions or trends that almost always favor the same interests in
power and political influence of that establishment. From the diplomatic point of view these
bodies supposedly deal to preserve peace and resolve the great problems of humanity, but their
actions reveal, under closer inspection, a comprehensive policy in favor of the economic
interests that wield political power. They are even instrument of these powers that sometimes
contributes to improving the image of their cause and they do some humanitarian work but
without major profound changes. According to Professor Jeffrey Grupp
But there are two powers that have not been considered; the power of people when they
demand the best choice and the power of truth. There are small battles to be won even step by
step. Gandhi triumph over military power, there have been peaceful revolutions in the Middle
East, people use more and more natural medicine, organic foods. The so-called "banker to the
poor" had an unexpected success. The mass media have been losing audience, which turns to
alternative media in search of objectivity. And in the political field, sogventry and practical
pragmatism is gaining more ground against the policy based on ideology or cheap politics.