TỔNG ÔN TẬP THI VÀO LỚP 10 MÔN TIẾNG ANH NĂM HỌC 2023 - 2024 CÓ ĐÁP ÁN (NGỮ Â...
Using Technology to Bring Together a Large Decentralized Campus for Student Success
1. Using Technology to Bring
Together a Large Decentralized
Campus for Student Success
July 28, 2015
Tina Balser, M.Ed.
Sr. Student Success Coordinator
University of Missouri-Columbia
3. Early Warning & Student Tracking System
• Student concerns can be manually flagged
when observed or through periodic
surveys.
• Recommendations can be communicated
to the student.
• Appropriate personnel are informed of
flags raised and cleared.
• Close the loop with faculty when progress
is made.
Slide 3
Educational Support Networking System
• Each student has personal My Success
Network of instructors and campus staff.
• Online scheduling for in-person
meetings – both individual and group
appointments.
• Appointment confirmation by email.
• Documentation of contact with students
through private and shared notes.
• Service catalog of available campus
support resources.
4. Change Management
What is Change Management?
• Focus on People, Communications, Influence Strategies
1. Create a Climate for Change
2. Engage and enable the whole organization
3. Implement and Sustain the Change
• “Changes are not entrenched until they are “how we do things
around here” and not “new” behaviors” (Kotter, 1996)
5. University of Missouri
• Large 4-year public research Institution
• Major land-grant institution
• Flagship campus UM System
• AAU Member
• 18 Schools and Colleges
• 307 Degrees and Certificate Programs
6. University of Missouri
• Fall 2014 Enrollment
• Total: 35,441
• In-state: 24,586 (69.4 %)
• Out-of-state: 10,855 (30.6 %)
• Undergraduate: 27,654 (78 %)
• First Time College (FTC): 6,515
• Moderately Selective
• ACT 25.9
• Retention (Fresh-Soph)-86.2%
• Graduation Rate (6 yr)- 69.4%
• Gender
• Female (52.0%)
• Ethnicity
• White (76.4%)
• African American (7.2)
• Hispanic (3.3)
• Asian (2.3)
• American Indian (0.2)
• Multiple Race (2.5)
• Non-Res Alien (6.8)
• International
• 2,393 Students (7.2%)
• 120 Countries
7. Background
• Commission for Student Success, 2011
• UM System Initiative
• Performance Funding
• Comprehensive Retention Initiative (CRI)
• MU Strategic Operating Plan
• Institutional Analytics
Creating a Climate for Change
11. • “MU Connect has enabled me to keep in-touch with my advisors, it’s kept
me on a path to graduation from MU. Once I found out how to access the
service, it has reduced the time it takes to schedule and verify my
appointments.” MU Student, Class of 2016
• MU Connect has streamlined the advising operations in our office. It has
created less traffic and chaos during pre-registration time. Students are
able to sign up for an appointment with ease and get reminders from the
system. It has also helped me to be more efficient to be able to spend more
time with my advisees rather than scheduling appointments on my own. –
MU Academic Advisor
• “As an educator, my main goal is to reach out to students to ensure that they
are keeping up with their progress. Using the early warning system is
helping me greatly achieve my objective.” MU faculty member
12. Stakeholders
•Vice Provost for Undergraduate Studies
•Deans, Student Affairs, Academic Affairs, DirectorsSponsor & Leadership
•Faculty Council, Advising Council, Admin Team, Early Alert Advisory Board
Advisory Areas
•Advising, Course Support, Academic Resource Support
Faculty & Staff
•Student Government
•Student AssociationsStudents
•Data & Analytics
Institutional Research
•ET@MO- Blackboard, SIS- PeopleSoft
Technology
Creating a Climate for Change
13. Strategy
• Starfish Connect
• Academic Advising Units and Student Serving Centers
• Homegrown systems
• Purchased other scheduling systems
• Relied heavily on support staff to make appointments
• Starfish Early Alert
• 1000 & 2000 Level Courses, High Enrollment, High DFW
• MU did not have an existing Academic Alert system already in place
• Some Departments had their own EA systems in place
Creating a Climate for Change
14. Implementation Approach
• Intentional, Clear, Simple, Transparent
• Appreciative Inquiry
• Live Demonstrations and Q&A
• Share background and benefits for students
• Technology Adoption Framework
• Appointed admins from each school/college/service
• Balance technology with the School/College/Service needs
“We are doing this with you, not to you.”
Dr. Jim Spain, Vice Provost for Undergraduate Studies
15. Connect Implementation Plan
Academic
• 9 Academic
Schools/Colleges
• Academic
Exploration
• Honors College
• Athletics
• Mizzou Online
• Student Success
Center
• International
Center
Financial
• Financial Aid
• Cashier’s Office
• Office of Financial
Success
Student Affairs
• Residential Life
• Disability Center
• Veteran’s Center
• Student Conduct
• New Student
Programs
• Student Life
• Social Justice
Units
High Impact
Practices
• Service Learning
• Study Abroad
• UG Research
Engaging the Whole Organization
16. Sharing Permissions
• Based on Relationship
• Based on Role Permissions
• Based on Feature Permissions
Academic
Advisors
Disability
Center
Financial
Aid
Residential
Life
Career
Center
• How you restrict access?
• How do people gain access?
• I’m not sure if I am comfortable with
sharing information in the system if
everyone can see everything.
17. Academic Advising
Appointment Mechanisms Advising Reasons
• Add/Drop Course
• Withdraw from Course
• Withdraw from Term/University
• Change Major
• Graduation Plan
• General Advising
• Probation/Dismissal Questions
• Career Exploration
• Study Abroad
• Personal/Financial/Illness
• My Success Network
• One-to-One Relationship from
PeopleSoft
• Academic Advisor
• Student Facing Kiosk
• Advisor Waiting Room
• Office Hour Blocks- Term Based
• Scheduling Deadlines
23. Connect Highlights
Fall 2014
• 38,098 appointments (including walk-
ins) were scheduled
• 20,431 undergraduate students (75%
of UG students) had at least one
appointment
• 227 Faculty and Staff members had at
least one appointment
Spring 2015
• 42,859 appointments (including walk-
ins) were scheduled
• 20,735 undergraduate students (81%
of UG students) had at least one
appointment
• 70% of Scheduled Appointments were
student initiated
• 255 Faculty and Staff members had at
least one appointment
24. Early Alert Implementation
Spring 2014
•Small Pilot
•Math Course Pilot
•Exhausted
Features
Fall 2014
•Large Pilot
•Targeted 20 Large
Lecture Courses
•Progress Surveys 4
& 8 Week
Spring 2015
•All Arts and Science
Courses
•Replaced
Homegrown
System
•1000 Level & 2000
Level Courses
Summer 2015
•Targeted Progress
Surveys
•Trial Admission
Program
•Athletics
Fall 2015
•Targeted Courses
•High Enrollment
•DFW
•1000 & 2000
•General Education
Courses
•Intervention Plan
Development
Engaging the Whole Organization
25. Early Alert
Flags
• Manual Flags
• Attendance Concern
• Missing Assignment
• Poor Class Performance
• Low Exam Score
• In Danger of Being Dropped
• In Danger of Failing
• Experimental
• Student Flagged 6 Times
• Attribute Based
• Cashier’s Flag- Stop Registration
• Financial Aid- FA SAP Not Met
• Self Paced- No Progress @ 6 months
Kudos
• Outstanding Academic Performance
• Keep Up the Good Work
• Showing Improvement
• Tutoring Referral
• Writing Center
Referrals
26. MU Early Alert- Action Hierarchy
Flag Level Description Flag Type
Informational
• Notification about a student concern
• Does not necessarily rise to the level of calling
for specific action
• Provides important and accurate information
about a students progress
• Faculty/other data providers understand that not
all informational flags will be addressed/cleared
Attendance Concern
Not Accessing Online Class
Missing Assignment
Action
• Identifies student in need of intervention
• Action may be initiated
• Flag will only be cleared when student responds
to outreach
Low Exam Score
Poor Class Performance
Urgent
• Calls for immediate intervention
• Carries an expectation of outreach
• Flag will only be cleared when student responds
to outreach
In Danger of Failing
In Danger of Being Dropped
Student Flagged 6 Times
27. Intervention Steps
• Outreach Email to Students
• Email provided contact suggestions and invited student to schedule
• Students were contacted by academic advisor
Urgent Flags
480 Flags
369 Unique Students
Student Interventions
42 Unique Student Meetings
28. Spring 2015 Outcomes
Urgent Flag & Intervention
• 65% of students earned a C or
better or Withdrew from the
course.
• 26% of students earned a
passing grade of a C or better
Urgent Flag and No Intervention
• 53% of students earned a C or
better or Withdrew from the
course.
• 15% of students earned a
passing grade of a C or better
30. Successes & Challenges
Successes
• Leadership Support
• Starfish Coordinator
• Admin Team
• Train the Trainor Approach
• Early Alert Advisory Board
Challenges
• Resources
• Time
• Faculty Buy-In
• Balance administrative functions
• Troubleshooting Support
Implement and Sustain the Change
31. Next Steps
• Expand Early Alert
• Develop Additional Referrals & Templates
• Strengthen Intervention Strategies
• Student Life Implementation
• Advanced User Trainings-Technology to Practice
• Integrations with Degree Audit and EAB
Implement and Sustain the Change
32. What Did We Learn?
• Assess Readiness (Readiness Framework)
• Engage Leadership & Stakeholders
• Clear Consistent Messaging
• Share Implementation Goals
• Keep it Simple
• Leverage Resources
• Network with Institutions
• Celebrate Small Wins and Share Success