SlideShare utilise les cookies pour améliorer les fonctionnalités et les performances, et également pour vous montrer des publicités pertinentes. Si vous continuez à naviguer sur ce site, vous acceptez l’utilisation de cookies. Consultez nos Conditions d’utilisation et notre Politique de confidentialité.
SlideShare utilise les cookies pour améliorer les fonctionnalités et les performances, et également pour vous montrer des publicités pertinentes. Si vous continuez à naviguer sur ce site, vous acceptez l’utilisation de cookies. Consultez notre Politique de confidentialité et nos Conditions d’utilisation pour en savoir plus.
Who are we? Geospatial Systems Architect at metaspatial. ● President of OSGeo ● OGC Architecture Board Member ● OpenStreetMap Advocate Founder of several companies and initiatives, provides consulting for SDI and travels a lot. Author: Arnulf Christl 2 / 42 2 / 15
The Mythology of INSPIREThe term "mythology" can refer either tothe study of myths (e.g., comparativemythology), or to a body or collection ofmyths... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mythology INSPIRE is of the second type 3
Technology vs. PoliticsThe mythology of INSPIRE grew with thefiction that a technical framework cansolve an: ● otherwise ● apparently ● unsolvable… political diversity. 4
The Reality of INSPIREThe result is that we now have● a highly complicated and● infamously rigid… technical framework which does notsolve the political problem. 5
… because technology never was a suitable tool to tackle politics. 6
Common MisconceptionsINSPIRE comes in two tastes● Implementing Rules (legally binding)● Technical Guidelines (recommendations that are not legally binding)Nota Bene:Data schemes are legally binding! 7
Conforming to INSPIRE?Technical Guidelines have conformanceclasses (software tests). ImplementingRules do not have conformance classes.This means that software can onlyconform to the non legally bindingaspects of INSPIRE?!? 8
Communication IssuesWhy does INSPIRE not work bottom-up(by being more open) or closer withexisting working groups andorganizations?● Because INSPIRE is not a person● INSPIRE is not a community● and top-down● … 9
The Structure of INSPIREINSPIRE was an inspiring idea …Now it is:● a legal construct● technical framework● top-down implementation● but not a communityINSPIRE has been designed bybureaucrats for bureaucracies toimprove bureaucratic processes. 10
How can INSPIRE Improve Communication?● INSPIRE members need to identify themselves as a community with common interests● INSPIRE members have to bring Change Request into existing standards processes● INSPIRE members have to recognize INSPIRE as a chance and not as a legal threat that is best avoided 11
Access to PSIWhat INSPIRE forgot to address:● INSPIRE does not address licensing● Access restriction is left to the data providers● Technological changes are much faster than legal processesSocial networks and participativegovernment evolve much quicker thanthe seemingly innovative INSPIRE idea 12
Know How● Lack of information dissemination (top-down funnel effect) results in an information pile-up● There is too little Know-How available at the implementing level● Lack of Know-How at the technical level of the data providers thwarts efforts of building working infrastructure 13
Authoritative Data!INSPIRE could become the source forauthoritative data. Questions toaddress:● How to document authoritative data?● How to make the know-how available required to get Things Done?● How to integrate INSPIRE with community projects?● How to make INSPIRE really useful to the citizen? 14
Thank you for your Attention! The annual Conference on Free and Open Source SoftwareWith friendly support by: for Geospatial Copyright: Arnulf Christl, metaspatial. Thishttp://www.metaspatial.net slide set is copyrighted to the commons 15/15