SlideShare une entreprise Scribd logo
1  sur  6
Télécharger pour lire hors ligne
International Journal of Research in Advent Technology, Vol.3, No.7, July 2015
E-ISSN: 2321-9637
46
Estimating Capacity and Level of Service of
PGIMER Roads, Chandigarh
Amanpreet Kaur1
, Dr. Tripta Goyal2
M.E. (Transportation Engineering) Student1
, Professor2
, Civil Engineering Deptt.12
, PEC University of
Technology, Chandigarh, India12
, E-mail:akaur1991@yahoo.com1
, goyaltripta@yahoo.com2
Abstract- In this paper a significant effort has been made to study the traffic flow characteristics of PGIMER
Chandigarh. It is considered as one of the best medical and research institution situated on the outer periphery of
the Chandigarh. It is facing lots of traffic problems nowadays. The city is now not able to control and satisfy the
vehicular needs owing to the increase in population which has grown manifolds. An effort has been made in
order to study the various problems occurring on the roads of PGIMER. The present study is about the
evaluation of traffic flow characteristics on the two main gates of PGIMER and the main roads adjoining to
them. Due to mixed nature of traffic it gets difficult to accommodate all the kinds of traffic on these roads.
Excessive delays occur with low running speeds and traffic congestion at various junctions and midblock
sections. The study includes the analysis of the traffic characteristics like volume, capacity, level of service. The
data was analyzed for peak hour of the traffic.
Index terms: Capacity, Level of Service
1. INTRODUCTION
Traffic on Indian roads consists of variety of vehicles.
These vehicles have widely different static and
dynamic characteristics. The traffic is also very
different from homogeneous traffic which primarily
consists of motorized traffic [6]. Chandigarh today
faces the problems that the carefully designed original
Plan was meant to avoid. Chandigarh’s road network
is under intense pressure today due to increase in
population, explosive growth in the number of private
vehicles which has increased the number of
personalised vehicles, partly due to the absence of an
efficient and reliable public transport system. There is
now a lot of intercity vehicular traffic from the
neighboring states which have strong daily interaction
with the city. With the increasing traffic growth, there
is congestion on the roads and increase in the number
of accidents [11].
1.1 Study area
This study aims at collecting and analyzing the
volume, speed on PGIMER roads. PGIMER is a top
ranking medical and research institution situated on
the outer periphery of Chandigarh in North-West
direction in Sector-11. It has educational, medical
research and training facilities for its students. It
attracts thousands of patients across the northern
region. These visitors use different types of vehicles
such as scooters, motor cycles, cars, jeeps, bicycles,
rickshaws, auto-rickshaws and pedestrians. The
institute has two main entries i.e. from Gate 1 and
Gate 2. It has V5 and V6 type of roads. One of its
main entries is connected to Madhya Marg opposite to
Punjab University Chandigarh. Its second entry
connects New OPD to Vidya Path. The main roads
carrying the maximum traffic are opposite to the
Nehru hospital and new OPD road [13].
Major challenges faced by the commuters are:
• Traffic on the main road of the institute is
one of the major challenges.
• PGIMER is handling more than four to five
times its capacity.
• Considering high ownership of four wheelers
and two wheelers by the city dwellers,
volume on the roads is increasing manifold.
• There is high pedestrian traffic in some
sections of PGIMER.
• The Level of Service of roads is deteriorating
and leading to delays and congestions adding
to misery of road users.
International Journal of Research in Advent Technology, Vol.3, No.7, July 2015
E-ISSN: 2321-9637
47
Fig. 1 Roadmap of PGIMER
1.2 Objective and methodology of the study
Objective and scope of study is:
• To study the traffic flow variations on the
selected roads of PGIMER to determine
hourly and daily variation of traffic.
• To study the traffic flow pattern on the
weekdays and weekends and determine
traffic composition.
• To evaluate the capacity, level of service
and traffic performance of the road.
• To give suggestions for improvement in
the traffic characteristics of PGIMER.
Study methodology has the following steps:
Pilot Survey: Pilot survey was conducted
in order to understand the road network
and the existing problems in that area.
Selection of critical points: This was done
based on the Pilot survey. The critical
points were decided based on the stretches
carrying the maximum traffic.
Data Collection: The Data was collected
for the volume studies, for the purpose of
designing or improving planning and
management.
Traffic Volume Study: The traffic volume
counts were done manually and by
videography technique at the selected
points.
Data Analysis: Data collected was then
analysed to determine the traffic
composition, daily and hourly traffic
variations on weekdays and weekends, to
determine capacity and Level of Service.
Conclusions and Recommendations: After
the analysis was done conclusions were
drawn and recommendations were made
for the same.
2. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
The data collection was done after carefully
studying the Study Area. After doing the pilot
survey particular roads were taken. It was made
sure that the roads under study were free from all
the obstructions like signals, stop signs and
excessive kerb parking etc. The study was
conducted on a clear weather when the pavement
was dry and no repair work was under operation at
that time [7] [8]. In the Study Area, the roads in
front of Nehru Hospital and OPD were taken for
the traffic surveys which include traffic Volume
Study, Capacity Study, Estimation of Level of
Service.
International Journal of Research in Advent Technology, Vol.3, No.7, July 2015
E-ISSN: 2321-9637
48
Traffic volume study was conducted on the
working days i.e. from Monday to Saturday on both
the gates (Gate 1 and Gate 2). Both Gate 1 and
Gate 2 have separate entrance and an exit. The
counting of vehicles going inside P.G.I. and
coming out of P.G.I. was done for both the gates
continuously for 10 hours from 07:30 am to 05:30
pm as from pilot survey it was observed that these
were the busiest hours during which the traffic was
high as compared to the other part of the day.
The physical characteristics of the two gates at
which volume study was done were measured with
the help of measuring tape. The width of entrance
and exit is 7 m at Gate 1 and width of entrance and
exit is 7 m.
2.1 Method used for volume count
Videography technique was used for calculating
volume count on both the gates. For this a Sony
Digital Handycam was mounted over a tripod stand
[9]. It was placed at a point where it could capture
the view without any obstruction. The video was
made continuously for the required number of
hours. Later the counts of vehicles going inside and
coming out of P.G.I. were made watching the
video. Thedata collected from video was compiled
in time interval of an hour, based on which the data
sheets were made for hourly and daily variation of
traffic volume and for weekly variation in the
traffic volume. Normally traffic increases, reaches
to the maximum value during peak hours and start
decreasing in off peak hours. Therefore, we can say
that traffic movements are depended on hourly and
daily variations.
Table 1 Hourly and daily traffic volume variation at
Gate 1
Table 2Hourly and daily traffic volume variation at
Gate 2
From the hourly variation plot for Gate 1 for 6 days
a week, it is observed that the maximum number of
vehicles going inside PGI was 1751 vehicles i.e.
1562 PCUs 0830 am-0930 am on Tuesday and the
maximum number of vehicles coming out of PGI
was 971 vehicles i.e. 585 PCUs 1130 am-1230 pm
on Tuesday. From the hourly variation plot for
Gate 2 for 6 days a week, it was observed that the
maximum traffic in number going inside PGI was
961 vehicles i.e. 893 PCUs 09:30 am-1030 am on
Saturday and the maximum traffic in number
coming out of PGI was 881 vehicles i.e. 803 PCUs
1230 pm-0130 pm on Friday.
Table 3 Hourly and daily traffic volume variation
of total traffic from Gate 1 and Gate 2
From the hourly variation plot for Gate 1 and Gate
2 combined for 6 days a week, it is observed that
the maximum number of vehicles going inside PGI
was 2520 vehicles 08:30 am-09:30 am on Tuesday
and the maximum number of vehicles coming out
of PGI was 1771 vehicles 11:30 am-1230 pm on
Monday.
COUNT HOUR
DIRECTION IN OUT IN OUT IN OUT IN OUT IN OUT
07:30 am- 08:30 am 1255 439 1435 575 1331 583 840 414 1081 417 598
08:30 am- 09:30 am 1270 516 1751 638 1335 609 1231 488 1267 484 1172
09:30 am- 10:30 am 1292 598 1237 603 1421 720 1442 540 1641 567 1441
10:30 am- 11:30 am 808 543 899 644 948 647 1154 729 1295 838 910
11:30 am- 12:30 pm 918 967 880 971 770 898 783 696 848 770 716
12:30 pm- 01:30 pm 783 770 740 845 616 728 637 733 663 761 609
01:30 pm- 02:30 pm 659 561 624 571 489 627 575 634 560 634 589
02:30 pm- 03:30 pm 516 644 506 756 537 664 465 783 485 856 435
03:30 pm- 04:30 pm 354 510 381 761 343 479 359 581 352 611 364
04:30 pm- 05:30 pm 250 420 311 695 259 424 287 493 286 477 277
TOTAL VOLUME 8105 5968 8764 7059 8049 6379 7773 6091 8478 6415 7111
TOTAL PCU 7237 5380 7836 6354 7234 5766 6984 5503 7603 5832 6342
MONDAY TUESDAY WEDNESDAY THURSDAY FRIDAY
COUNTHOUR
DIRECTION IN OUT IN OUT IN OUT IN OUT IN OUT IN OUT
07:30 am- 08:30 am 949 454 831 401 901 440 642 372 732 387 602 376
08:30 am- 09:30 am 773 402 769 385 782 396 775 411 711 394 885 448
09:30 am- 10:30 am 572 533 594 524 594 532 776 480 652 531 961 437
10:30 am- 11:30 am 639 713 670 657 665 700 586 632 589 675 624 591
11:30 am- 12:30 pm 559 804 614 789 597 802 440 656 442 747 466 568
12:30 pm- 01:30 pm 486 803 591 824 549 828 471 747 469 881 500 621
01:30 pm- 02:30 pm 485 750 492 741 499 756 487 716 466 793 542 675
02:30 pm- 03:30 pm 434 712 473 703 464 717 395 698 389 702 425 734
03:30 pm- 04:30 pm 309 581 358 547 343 574 354 636 361 621 368 688
04:30 pm- 05:30 pm 204 521 266 459 246 509 246 489 244 477 263 522
TOTAL VOLUME 5410 6273 5658 6030 5640 6254 5172 5837 5055 6208 5636 5660
TOTAL PCU 4898 5611 5041 5424 5062 5594 4668 5235 4562 5587 5119 5080
SATURDAYMONDAY TUESDAY WEDNESDAY THURSDAY FRIDAY
COUNTHOUR
DIRECTION IN OUT IN OUT IN OUT IN OUT IN OUT IN OUT
07:30 am- 08:30am 2204 893 2317 976 2232 1023 1482 786 1813 804 1200 773
08:30 am- 09:30am 2043 918 2520 1023 2117 1005 2006 899 1978 878 2057 936
09:30 am- 10:30am 1864 1131 1831 1127 2015 1252 2218 1020 2293 1098 2402 935
10:30 am- 11:30am 1447 1256 1569 1301 1613 1347 1740 1361 1884 1513 1534 1224
11:30 am- 12:30pm 1477 1771 1494 1760 1367 1700 1223 1352 1290 1517 1182 1195
12:30 pm- 01:30pm 1269 1573 1331 1669 1165 1556 1108 1480 1132 1642 1109 1323
01:30 pm- 02:30pm 1144 1311 1116 1312 988 1383 1062 1350 1026 1427 1131 1329
02:30 pm- 03:30pm 950 1356 979 1459 1001 1381 860 1481 874 1558 860 1462
03:30 pm- 04:30pm 663 1091 739 1308 686 1053 713 1217 713 1232 732 1245
04:30 pm- 05:30pm 454 941 577 1154 505 933 533 982 530 954 540 1032
TOTAL VOLUME 13515 12241 14422 13089 13689 12633 12945 11928 13533 12623 12747 11454
MONDAY TUESDAY WEDNESDAY THURSDAY FRIDAY SATURDAY
International Journal of Research in Advent Technology, Vol.3, No.7, July 2015
E-ISSN: 2321-9637
49
The composition of traffic going inside and coming
out of PGI from both the gates follows almost the
same trend on all days. It mainly consists of 50
percent of 4 Wheelers or Cars, 44 percent of 2-
Wheelers and 6 percent of 3- Wheelers for traffic
going inside and for traffic coming out the
composition of traffic as observed was 50percent of
4 Wheelers or Cars, 44 percent of 2- Wheelers and
6 percent of 3- Wheelers. It can be seen from the
above analysis that the composition of traffic
follows the same trend for traffic going inside and
coming outside of PGI. Traffic flow pattern follows
almost the same trend on all the days also [12].
3. CAPACITY AND LEVEL OF
SERVICE COMPUTATION
Capacity was calculated for the two roads adjoining
Gate 1 (opposite to Nehru Hospital) and Gate 2
(New OPD), as these are the major roads of P.G.I.
carrying maximum traffic volume. The physical
features of the roads are: Road opposite to Nehru
Hospital (Gate 1) has width of 10 m and New
OPD road (Gate 2) has width of 9.5 m.
Using the results from volume analysis, peak hour
flow can be determined for both the gates for
traffic going inside and coming out [1].
Table 4 Peak Hour PCUs at Gate 1 and Gate 2
We can calculate Level of Service during peak in
morning and evening hours from V/C ratio.
Capacity can be calculated from the reference
tables for design service volume [3].
The level of service for road opposite to Nehru
hospital during the peak hours approaches E as
the V/C ratio is greater than 1 which is highly
unacceptable. The LOS- E for the peak hour can
be determined according to the V/C ratio [4] [5].
Moreover, the low speed is mandatory in this area
as it is the main road connecting all the main
hospitals. There are no restrictions for loading and
unloading of the passengers which lead to lower
level of service. Hence, very unstable flow with
intolerable delays and lower running speeds on this
road [2].
Similarly, the level of service for New OPD road
during the peak hour approaches D with V/C ratio
approaching 0.8. Hence, the road has a very
unstable flow with tolerable delays and lower
running speeds. This road connects the residential
area and the New OPD, solower speed is
mandatory. As there are no waiting restrictions on
the roadway in both the directions, this leads to
lower level ofservice. And the loading and
unloading of the passengers is also allowed on
these roads. Hence this road provides very unstable
flow [10].
Table 5 Computation of V/C ratio
LOCATION PERIOD TOTAL
VEHICLE
TOTAL
PCU’S
GATE NO. 1
PEAK
HOUR
FOR
TRAFFIC
COMING
IN
1751 1562
PEAK
HOUR FOR
TRAFFIC
GOING
OUT
971 869
GATE NO. 2
PEAK
HOUR
FOR
TRAFFIC
COMING
IN
961 893
PEAK
HOUR FOR
TRAFFIC
GOING
OUT
881 803
International Journal of Research in Advent Technology, Vol.3, No.7, July 2015
E-ISSN: 2321-9637
50
4. CONCLUSIONS
The following main conclusions have been
drawn from the study:
i. From the present study the maximum of
8764 vehicles i.e. 7836 PCUs going inside
P.G.I. and 7059 vehicles i.e. 6354 PCUs
coming out of P.G.I. on Tuesday and a
minimum of 7111 vehicles i.e. 6342 PCUs
going inside P.G.I. on Saturday and a
minimum of 5794 vehicles i.e. 5212 PCUs
coming out of P.G.I on Saturday only.
ii. From the hourly variation plot for Gate 1
for 6 days (Monday to Saturday) a week,
the maximum number of vehicles going
inside PGI was 1751 vehicles 08:30 am-
09:30 am on Tuesday and the maximum
number of vehicles coming out of PGI was 971
vehicles 11:30 am-12:30 pm on Tuesday.
iii. The maximum PCUs going inside was 1562
PCUs 08:30 am-09:30 am on Tuesday and the
maximum PCUs coming out was 869 PCUs
11:30 am-12:30 pm on Monday and Tuesday
from Gate 1.
iv. From the hourly variation plot for Gate 2 for 6
days (Monday to Saturday) a week, the
maximum traffic in number going inside PGI
was 961 vehicles i.e. 893 PCUs 09:30 am-
10:30 am on Saturday and the maximum traffic
in number coming out of PGI was 881 vehicles
i.e. 803 PCUs 12:30 pm-01:30 pm on Friday.
v. The maximum PCUs going inside was 893
PCUs 08:30 am-10:30 am on Saturday and the
maximum PCUs coming out was757 PCUs
12:30 pm-01:30 pm on Tuesday at Gate 2.
vi. The composition of traffic going inside
consists of 52percent of 4 Wheelers or Cars, 42
percent of 2- Wheelers and 6percent of 3-
Wheelers and for traffic coming out the
composition of traffic was 49percent of 4
Wheelers or Cars, 46percent of 2- Wheelers
and 5 percent of 3- Wheelers. Traffic flow
pattern follows almost the same trend on all
the working days.
vii. The variation of total traffic on Gate 1 and
Gate 2 indicated a maximum of 14422 vehicles
going inside P.G.I. on Tuesday and 13089
vehicles coming out of P.G.I. on Tuesday and
a minimum of 12747 vehicles going inside
P.G.I. on Saturday and a minimum of 11454
vehicles coming out of P.G.I on Saturday.
viii. From the hourly variation plot for Gate 1 and
Gate 2 combined for 6 days a week, it was
observed that the maximum traffic in number
going inside PGI was 2520 vehicles 08:30 am-
09:30 am on Tuesday and the maximum traffic
in number coming out of PGI was 1771
vehicles 11:30 am-12:30 pm on Monday.
ix. The level of service was computed using v/c
ratio for Gate no. 1 and Gate no. 2 during the
peak and it was found to be LOS- E and D
respectively. This zone has very unstable flow
with intolerable delays and lower running
speeds on this road.
REFERENCES
[1] Chandra S., 2004, Capacity estimation
procedure for two-lane roads under mixed
traffic conditions, Journal of Indian Road
Congress, Vol. 65-1, pp. 139-171.
[2] Hossain, M. and Iqbal, G.A.,1999, Vehicular
Headway Distribution and Free Speed
Characteristics of Two-lane Two-way
Highway of Bangladesh,Institution of
Engineers (India) Vol. 80, pp. 77-80.
[3]HCM, 2010, Highway Capacity Manual.
[4] IRC:64,1990, The Indian Road Congress,
Guidelines for capacity of roads in rural areas.
[5] IRC:106, 1990, The Indian Road Congress,
Guidelines for capacity of roads in rural areas.
[6] Jalihal S.A., 2005, Traffic characteristics of
India, Proceedings of the Eastern Asia Society
for Transportation Studies, Vol. 5, pp. 1009 –
102.
[7] Kadyali L.R., 2010, Traffic Engineering and
Transportation Planning, Khanna Publishers.
[8] Kadyali L.R. and Lal N.B., 2012, Principles
and Practices of Highway Engineering,
Khanna Publishers.
LOCA
TION
PERIO
D
Vol
ume
(PC
U/hr
)
(V)
Wid
th of
road
(m)
No
. of
lan
es
DES
IGN
SER
VIC
E
VOL
UM
E
(C)
V/
C
RA
TI
O
LEV
EL
OF
SER
VICE
GATE
NO. 1
PEAK
HOUR
FLOW
(PCU)
243
1
10 3 2200 1.1 E
GATE
NO. 2
PEAK
HOUR
FLOW
(PCU)
169
6
9.5 3 2100 0.8 D
International Journal of Research in Advent Technology, Vol.3, No.7, July 2015
E-ISSN: 2321-9637
51
[9] Khanna S.K., and Justo C.E.G., 1976,
Highway engineering, New Chand & Bros,
Roorkee
[10]Kadiyali, L.R. et al, 1991, Speed-Flow
Characteristics on Indian Highways, Indian
Roads Congress Journal, Vol. 52-2, New
Delhi, pp. 233-262.
[11]Panda Haribandhu & Pundir RS, 2002.
Problems and possible solutions for better
traffic management: A case study of Vadodara-
Ahmedabad section of national highway eight,
Research paper, Institute of Rural
Management, August.
[12]Sahoo, P.K., Rao, S.K. and Kumar, V.M.,
1996, A Study of Traffic Flow Characteristics
on Two Stretches of National Highway No. 5,
Indian Highways, Vol. 24-4, Indian Roads
Congress, New Delhi, pp. 11-17.
[13]www.pgimer.edu.in

Contenu connexe

En vedette

Paper id 37201525
Paper id 37201525Paper id 37201525
Paper id 37201525IJRAT
 
Paper id 26201474
Paper id 26201474Paper id 26201474
Paper id 26201474IJRAT
 
Paper id 2620141
Paper id 2620141Paper id 2620141
Paper id 2620141IJRAT
 
北投社大造景計畫
北投社大造景計畫北投社大造景計畫
北投社大造景計畫平台 青
 
Paper id 42201623
Paper id 42201623Paper id 42201623
Paper id 42201623IJRAT
 
Paper id 36201535
Paper id 36201535Paper id 36201535
Paper id 36201535IJRAT
 
Paper id 212014137
Paper id 212014137Paper id 212014137
Paper id 212014137IJRAT
 
Paper id 36201517
Paper id 36201517Paper id 36201517
Paper id 36201517IJRAT
 
Paper id 35201541
Paper id 35201541Paper id 35201541
Paper id 35201541IJRAT
 
Paper id 29201416
Paper id 29201416Paper id 29201416
Paper id 29201416IJRAT
 
Paper id 25201464
Paper id 25201464Paper id 25201464
Paper id 25201464IJRAT
 
Paper id 36201519
Paper id 36201519Paper id 36201519
Paper id 36201519IJRAT
 
Paper id 27201451
Paper id 27201451Paper id 27201451
Paper id 27201451IJRAT
 
Diseño instruccional para la producción de cursos en línea y el e learning
Diseño instruccional para la producción de cursos en línea y el e learningDiseño instruccional para la producción de cursos en línea y el e learning
Diseño instruccional para la producción de cursos en línea y el e learningMontserg93
 
Symptoms of a Bad Crank Shaft Position Sensor
Symptoms of a Bad Crank Shaft Position SensorSymptoms of a Bad Crank Shaft Position Sensor
Symptoms of a Bad Crank Shaft Position SensorStephens H Robertson
 
Ashok Leyland Fundamental Report by swastika Investmart
Ashok Leyland Fundamental Report by swastika InvestmartAshok Leyland Fundamental Report by swastika Investmart
Ashok Leyland Fundamental Report by swastika InvestmartSwastika Investmart
 
Daily technical outlook_for_24th_july_2015
Daily technical outlook_for_24th_july_2015Daily technical outlook_for_24th_july_2015
Daily technical outlook_for_24th_july_2015Swastika Investmart
 

En vedette (19)

Paper id 37201525
Paper id 37201525Paper id 37201525
Paper id 37201525
 
Santanu Bose
Santanu BoseSantanu Bose
Santanu Bose
 
Paper id 26201474
Paper id 26201474Paper id 26201474
Paper id 26201474
 
Paper id 2620141
Paper id 2620141Paper id 2620141
Paper id 2620141
 
北投社大造景計畫
北投社大造景計畫北投社大造景計畫
北投社大造景計畫
 
Paper id 42201623
Paper id 42201623Paper id 42201623
Paper id 42201623
 
Paper id 36201535
Paper id 36201535Paper id 36201535
Paper id 36201535
 
Paper id 212014137
Paper id 212014137Paper id 212014137
Paper id 212014137
 
Paper id 36201517
Paper id 36201517Paper id 36201517
Paper id 36201517
 
Paper id 35201541
Paper id 35201541Paper id 35201541
Paper id 35201541
 
weathering
weatheringweathering
weathering
 
Paper id 29201416
Paper id 29201416Paper id 29201416
Paper id 29201416
 
Paper id 25201464
Paper id 25201464Paper id 25201464
Paper id 25201464
 
Paper id 36201519
Paper id 36201519Paper id 36201519
Paper id 36201519
 
Paper id 27201451
Paper id 27201451Paper id 27201451
Paper id 27201451
 
Diseño instruccional para la producción de cursos en línea y el e learning
Diseño instruccional para la producción de cursos en línea y el e learningDiseño instruccional para la producción de cursos en línea y el e learning
Diseño instruccional para la producción de cursos en línea y el e learning
 
Symptoms of a Bad Crank Shaft Position Sensor
Symptoms of a Bad Crank Shaft Position SensorSymptoms of a Bad Crank Shaft Position Sensor
Symptoms of a Bad Crank Shaft Position Sensor
 
Ashok Leyland Fundamental Report by swastika Investmart
Ashok Leyland Fundamental Report by swastika InvestmartAshok Leyland Fundamental Report by swastika Investmart
Ashok Leyland Fundamental Report by swastika Investmart
 
Daily technical outlook_for_24th_july_2015
Daily technical outlook_for_24th_july_2015Daily technical outlook_for_24th_july_2015
Daily technical outlook_for_24th_july_2015
 

Similaire à Paper id 37201529

IRJET- Traffic Management Studies in Avadi
IRJET- Traffic Management Studies in AvadiIRJET- Traffic Management Studies in Avadi
IRJET- Traffic Management Studies in AvadiIRJET Journal
 
Analysis of Traffic Congestion Characteristics for M.G. Road, AGRA
Analysis of Traffic Congestion Characteristics for M.G. Road, AGRAAnalysis of Traffic Congestion Characteristics for M.G. Road, AGRA
Analysis of Traffic Congestion Characteristics for M.G. Road, AGRAIRJET Journal
 
IRJET- Study of Design Traffic Signal
IRJET- Study of Design Traffic SignalIRJET- Study of Design Traffic Signal
IRJET- Study of Design Traffic SignalIRJET Journal
 
Traffic growth rate estimation using transport
Traffic growth rate estimation using transportTraffic growth rate estimation using transport
Traffic growth rate estimation using transporteSAT Publishing House
 
TRAFFIC VOLUME STUDY AT SECTOR 18 NOIDA SECTION AND FUTURE FORECASTING USING ...
TRAFFIC VOLUME STUDY AT SECTOR 18 NOIDA SECTION AND FUTURE FORECASTING USING ...TRAFFIC VOLUME STUDY AT SECTOR 18 NOIDA SECTION AND FUTURE FORECASTING USING ...
TRAFFIC VOLUME STUDY AT SECTOR 18 NOIDA SECTION AND FUTURE FORECASTING USING ...Sukrati Pandit
 
IRJET- Traffic Study on Mid-Block Section & Intersection
IRJET-  	  Traffic Study on Mid-Block Section & IntersectionIRJET-  	  Traffic Study on Mid-Block Section & Intersection
IRJET- Traffic Study on Mid-Block Section & IntersectionIRJET Journal
 
Fuel assessment and design of public transportation model by using movement b...
Fuel assessment and design of public transportation model by using movement b...Fuel assessment and design of public transportation model by using movement b...
Fuel assessment and design of public transportation model by using movement b...IRJET Journal
 
Road Safety Auditing of Koratty Intersection
Road Safety Auditing of Koratty IntersectionRoad Safety Auditing of Koratty Intersection
Road Safety Auditing of Koratty IntersectionIRJET Journal
 
Traffic Signal Control Using Programmable Logic Controller (PLC)
Traffic Signal Control Using Programmable Logic Controller (PLC)Traffic Signal Control Using Programmable Logic Controller (PLC)
Traffic Signal Control Using Programmable Logic Controller (PLC)IJSRED
 
IRJET- Feasibility Check and Analysis of a Flyover Over a Railway Cross
IRJET-  	  Feasibility Check and Analysis of a Flyover Over a Railway CrossIRJET-  	  Feasibility Check and Analysis of a Flyover Over a Railway Cross
IRJET- Feasibility Check and Analysis of a Flyover Over a Railway CrossIRJET Journal
 
Evaluation of Traffic Characteristics: a Case Study on NH-12, Near Barkatulla...
Evaluation of Traffic Characteristics: a Case Study on NH-12, Near Barkatulla...Evaluation of Traffic Characteristics: a Case Study on NH-12, Near Barkatulla...
Evaluation of Traffic Characteristics: a Case Study on NH-12, Near Barkatulla...IRJET Journal
 
IRJET- Capacity Utilisation of Koothattukulam-North Palakkuzha Stretch in Ke...
IRJET- Capacity Utilisation  of Koothattukulam-North Palakkuzha Stretch in Ke...IRJET- Capacity Utilisation  of Koothattukulam-North Palakkuzha Stretch in Ke...
IRJET- Capacity Utilisation of Koothattukulam-North Palakkuzha Stretch in Ke...IRJET Journal
 
PROPOSED KAJANG URBAN TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT SYSTEM PRESENTATION
PROPOSED KAJANG URBAN TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT SYSTEM PRESENTATIONPROPOSED KAJANG URBAN TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT SYSTEM PRESENTATION
PROPOSED KAJANG URBAN TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT SYSTEM PRESENTATIONWael Alawsey
 
IRJET- Identification and Analysis of Black Spots along the Selected Road...
IRJET-  	  Identification and Analysis of Black Spots along the Selected Road...IRJET-  	  Identification and Analysis of Black Spots along the Selected Road...
IRJET- Identification and Analysis of Black Spots along the Selected Road...IRJET Journal
 
Study the Effects of Traffic Situation on Driver’s Mood and Root Choice Decis...
Study the Effects of Traffic Situation on Driver’s Mood and Root Choice Decis...Study the Effects of Traffic Situation on Driver’s Mood and Root Choice Decis...
Study the Effects of Traffic Situation on Driver’s Mood and Root Choice Decis...ijtsrd
 
IRJET- Analysis of Passenger Flow Parameters of Rail Transportation in Kerala
IRJET- Analysis of Passenger Flow Parameters of Rail Transportation in KeralaIRJET- Analysis of Passenger Flow Parameters of Rail Transportation in Kerala
IRJET- Analysis of Passenger Flow Parameters of Rail Transportation in KeralaIRJET Journal
 

Similaire à Paper id 37201529 (20)

IRJET- Traffic Management Studies in Avadi
IRJET- Traffic Management Studies in AvadiIRJET- Traffic Management Studies in Avadi
IRJET- Traffic Management Studies in Avadi
 
Analysis of Traffic Congestion Characteristics for M.G. Road, AGRA
Analysis of Traffic Congestion Characteristics for M.G. Road, AGRAAnalysis of Traffic Congestion Characteristics for M.G. Road, AGRA
Analysis of Traffic Congestion Characteristics for M.G. Road, AGRA
 
A2114065115
A2114065115A2114065115
A2114065115
 
IRJET- Study of Design Traffic Signal
IRJET- Study of Design Traffic SignalIRJET- Study of Design Traffic Signal
IRJET- Study of Design Traffic Signal
 
Traffic growth rate estimation using transport
Traffic growth rate estimation using transportTraffic growth rate estimation using transport
Traffic growth rate estimation using transport
 
TRAFFIC VOLUME STUDY AT SECTOR 18 NOIDA SECTION AND FUTURE FORECASTING USING ...
TRAFFIC VOLUME STUDY AT SECTOR 18 NOIDA SECTION AND FUTURE FORECASTING USING ...TRAFFIC VOLUME STUDY AT SECTOR 18 NOIDA SECTION AND FUTURE FORECASTING USING ...
TRAFFIC VOLUME STUDY AT SECTOR 18 NOIDA SECTION AND FUTURE FORECASTING USING ...
 
IRJET- Traffic Study on Mid-Block Section & Intersection
IRJET-  	  Traffic Study on Mid-Block Section & IntersectionIRJET-  	  Traffic Study on Mid-Block Section & Intersection
IRJET- Traffic Study on Mid-Block Section & Intersection
 
Fuel assessment and design of public transportation model by using movement b...
Fuel assessment and design of public transportation model by using movement b...Fuel assessment and design of public transportation model by using movement b...
Fuel assessment and design of public transportation model by using movement b...
 
Road Safety Auditing of Koratty Intersection
Road Safety Auditing of Koratty IntersectionRoad Safety Auditing of Koratty Intersection
Road Safety Auditing of Koratty Intersection
 
Traffic Signal Control Using Programmable Logic Controller (PLC)
Traffic Signal Control Using Programmable Logic Controller (PLC)Traffic Signal Control Using Programmable Logic Controller (PLC)
Traffic Signal Control Using Programmable Logic Controller (PLC)
 
IRJET- Feasibility Check and Analysis of a Flyover Over a Railway Cross
IRJET-  	  Feasibility Check and Analysis of a Flyover Over a Railway CrossIRJET-  	  Feasibility Check and Analysis of a Flyover Over a Railway Cross
IRJET- Feasibility Check and Analysis of a Flyover Over a Railway Cross
 
traffic safety ppt
traffic safety ppttraffic safety ppt
traffic safety ppt
 
Evaluation of Traffic Characteristics: a Case Study on NH-12, Near Barkatulla...
Evaluation of Traffic Characteristics: a Case Study on NH-12, Near Barkatulla...Evaluation of Traffic Characteristics: a Case Study on NH-12, Near Barkatulla...
Evaluation of Traffic Characteristics: a Case Study on NH-12, Near Barkatulla...
 
IRJET- Capacity Utilisation of Koothattukulam-North Palakkuzha Stretch in Ke...
IRJET- Capacity Utilisation  of Koothattukulam-North Palakkuzha Stretch in Ke...IRJET- Capacity Utilisation  of Koothattukulam-North Palakkuzha Stretch in Ke...
IRJET- Capacity Utilisation of Koothattukulam-North Palakkuzha Stretch in Ke...
 
ITS presentation final
ITS presentation final ITS presentation final
ITS presentation final
 
PROPOSED KAJANG URBAN TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT SYSTEM PRESENTATION
PROPOSED KAJANG URBAN TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT SYSTEM PRESENTATIONPROPOSED KAJANG URBAN TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT SYSTEM PRESENTATION
PROPOSED KAJANG URBAN TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT SYSTEM PRESENTATION
 
PROPOSED KAJANG URBAN TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT SYSTEM.
PROPOSED KAJANG URBAN TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT SYSTEM.PROPOSED KAJANG URBAN TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT SYSTEM.
PROPOSED KAJANG URBAN TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT SYSTEM.
 
IRJET- Identification and Analysis of Black Spots along the Selected Road...
IRJET-  	  Identification and Analysis of Black Spots along the Selected Road...IRJET-  	  Identification and Analysis of Black Spots along the Selected Road...
IRJET- Identification and Analysis of Black Spots along the Selected Road...
 
Study the Effects of Traffic Situation on Driver’s Mood and Root Choice Decis...
Study the Effects of Traffic Situation on Driver’s Mood and Root Choice Decis...Study the Effects of Traffic Situation on Driver’s Mood and Root Choice Decis...
Study the Effects of Traffic Situation on Driver’s Mood and Root Choice Decis...
 
IRJET- Analysis of Passenger Flow Parameters of Rail Transportation in Kerala
IRJET- Analysis of Passenger Flow Parameters of Rail Transportation in KeralaIRJET- Analysis of Passenger Flow Parameters of Rail Transportation in Kerala
IRJET- Analysis of Passenger Flow Parameters of Rail Transportation in Kerala
 

Plus de IJRAT

96202108
9620210896202108
96202108IJRAT
 
97202107
9720210797202107
97202107IJRAT
 
93202101
9320210193202101
93202101IJRAT
 
92202102
9220210292202102
92202102IJRAT
 
91202104
9120210491202104
91202104IJRAT
 
87202003
8720200387202003
87202003IJRAT
 
87202001
8720200187202001
87202001IJRAT
 
86202013
8620201386202013
86202013IJRAT
 
86202008
8620200886202008
86202008IJRAT
 
86202005
8620200586202005
86202005IJRAT
 
86202004
8620200486202004
86202004IJRAT
 
85202026
8520202685202026
85202026IJRAT
 
711201940
711201940711201940
711201940IJRAT
 
711201939
711201939711201939
711201939IJRAT
 
711201935
711201935711201935
711201935IJRAT
 
711201927
711201927711201927
711201927IJRAT
 
711201905
711201905711201905
711201905IJRAT
 
710201947
710201947710201947
710201947IJRAT
 
712201907
712201907712201907
712201907IJRAT
 
712201903
712201903712201903
712201903IJRAT
 

Plus de IJRAT (20)

96202108
9620210896202108
96202108
 
97202107
9720210797202107
97202107
 
93202101
9320210193202101
93202101
 
92202102
9220210292202102
92202102
 
91202104
9120210491202104
91202104
 
87202003
8720200387202003
87202003
 
87202001
8720200187202001
87202001
 
86202013
8620201386202013
86202013
 
86202008
8620200886202008
86202008
 
86202005
8620200586202005
86202005
 
86202004
8620200486202004
86202004
 
85202026
8520202685202026
85202026
 
711201940
711201940711201940
711201940
 
711201939
711201939711201939
711201939
 
711201935
711201935711201935
711201935
 
711201927
711201927711201927
711201927
 
711201905
711201905711201905
711201905
 
710201947
710201947710201947
710201947
 
712201907
712201907712201907
712201907
 
712201903
712201903712201903
712201903
 

Paper id 37201529

  • 1. International Journal of Research in Advent Technology, Vol.3, No.7, July 2015 E-ISSN: 2321-9637 46 Estimating Capacity and Level of Service of PGIMER Roads, Chandigarh Amanpreet Kaur1 , Dr. Tripta Goyal2 M.E. (Transportation Engineering) Student1 , Professor2 , Civil Engineering Deptt.12 , PEC University of Technology, Chandigarh, India12 , E-mail:akaur1991@yahoo.com1 , goyaltripta@yahoo.com2 Abstract- In this paper a significant effort has been made to study the traffic flow characteristics of PGIMER Chandigarh. It is considered as one of the best medical and research institution situated on the outer periphery of the Chandigarh. It is facing lots of traffic problems nowadays. The city is now not able to control and satisfy the vehicular needs owing to the increase in population which has grown manifolds. An effort has been made in order to study the various problems occurring on the roads of PGIMER. The present study is about the evaluation of traffic flow characteristics on the two main gates of PGIMER and the main roads adjoining to them. Due to mixed nature of traffic it gets difficult to accommodate all the kinds of traffic on these roads. Excessive delays occur with low running speeds and traffic congestion at various junctions and midblock sections. The study includes the analysis of the traffic characteristics like volume, capacity, level of service. The data was analyzed for peak hour of the traffic. Index terms: Capacity, Level of Service 1. INTRODUCTION Traffic on Indian roads consists of variety of vehicles. These vehicles have widely different static and dynamic characteristics. The traffic is also very different from homogeneous traffic which primarily consists of motorized traffic [6]. Chandigarh today faces the problems that the carefully designed original Plan was meant to avoid. Chandigarh’s road network is under intense pressure today due to increase in population, explosive growth in the number of private vehicles which has increased the number of personalised vehicles, partly due to the absence of an efficient and reliable public transport system. There is now a lot of intercity vehicular traffic from the neighboring states which have strong daily interaction with the city. With the increasing traffic growth, there is congestion on the roads and increase in the number of accidents [11]. 1.1 Study area This study aims at collecting and analyzing the volume, speed on PGIMER roads. PGIMER is a top ranking medical and research institution situated on the outer periphery of Chandigarh in North-West direction in Sector-11. It has educational, medical research and training facilities for its students. It attracts thousands of patients across the northern region. These visitors use different types of vehicles such as scooters, motor cycles, cars, jeeps, bicycles, rickshaws, auto-rickshaws and pedestrians. The institute has two main entries i.e. from Gate 1 and Gate 2. It has V5 and V6 type of roads. One of its main entries is connected to Madhya Marg opposite to Punjab University Chandigarh. Its second entry connects New OPD to Vidya Path. The main roads carrying the maximum traffic are opposite to the Nehru hospital and new OPD road [13]. Major challenges faced by the commuters are: • Traffic on the main road of the institute is one of the major challenges. • PGIMER is handling more than four to five times its capacity. • Considering high ownership of four wheelers and two wheelers by the city dwellers, volume on the roads is increasing manifold. • There is high pedestrian traffic in some sections of PGIMER. • The Level of Service of roads is deteriorating and leading to delays and congestions adding to misery of road users.
  • 2. International Journal of Research in Advent Technology, Vol.3, No.7, July 2015 E-ISSN: 2321-9637 47 Fig. 1 Roadmap of PGIMER 1.2 Objective and methodology of the study Objective and scope of study is: • To study the traffic flow variations on the selected roads of PGIMER to determine hourly and daily variation of traffic. • To study the traffic flow pattern on the weekdays and weekends and determine traffic composition. • To evaluate the capacity, level of service and traffic performance of the road. • To give suggestions for improvement in the traffic characteristics of PGIMER. Study methodology has the following steps: Pilot Survey: Pilot survey was conducted in order to understand the road network and the existing problems in that area. Selection of critical points: This was done based on the Pilot survey. The critical points were decided based on the stretches carrying the maximum traffic. Data Collection: The Data was collected for the volume studies, for the purpose of designing or improving planning and management. Traffic Volume Study: The traffic volume counts were done manually and by videography technique at the selected points. Data Analysis: Data collected was then analysed to determine the traffic composition, daily and hourly traffic variations on weekdays and weekends, to determine capacity and Level of Service. Conclusions and Recommendations: After the analysis was done conclusions were drawn and recommendations were made for the same. 2. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS The data collection was done after carefully studying the Study Area. After doing the pilot survey particular roads were taken. It was made sure that the roads under study were free from all the obstructions like signals, stop signs and excessive kerb parking etc. The study was conducted on a clear weather when the pavement was dry and no repair work was under operation at that time [7] [8]. In the Study Area, the roads in front of Nehru Hospital and OPD were taken for the traffic surveys which include traffic Volume Study, Capacity Study, Estimation of Level of Service.
  • 3. International Journal of Research in Advent Technology, Vol.3, No.7, July 2015 E-ISSN: 2321-9637 48 Traffic volume study was conducted on the working days i.e. from Monday to Saturday on both the gates (Gate 1 and Gate 2). Both Gate 1 and Gate 2 have separate entrance and an exit. The counting of vehicles going inside P.G.I. and coming out of P.G.I. was done for both the gates continuously for 10 hours from 07:30 am to 05:30 pm as from pilot survey it was observed that these were the busiest hours during which the traffic was high as compared to the other part of the day. The physical characteristics of the two gates at which volume study was done were measured with the help of measuring tape. The width of entrance and exit is 7 m at Gate 1 and width of entrance and exit is 7 m. 2.1 Method used for volume count Videography technique was used for calculating volume count on both the gates. For this a Sony Digital Handycam was mounted over a tripod stand [9]. It was placed at a point where it could capture the view without any obstruction. The video was made continuously for the required number of hours. Later the counts of vehicles going inside and coming out of P.G.I. were made watching the video. Thedata collected from video was compiled in time interval of an hour, based on which the data sheets were made for hourly and daily variation of traffic volume and for weekly variation in the traffic volume. Normally traffic increases, reaches to the maximum value during peak hours and start decreasing in off peak hours. Therefore, we can say that traffic movements are depended on hourly and daily variations. Table 1 Hourly and daily traffic volume variation at Gate 1 Table 2Hourly and daily traffic volume variation at Gate 2 From the hourly variation plot for Gate 1 for 6 days a week, it is observed that the maximum number of vehicles going inside PGI was 1751 vehicles i.e. 1562 PCUs 0830 am-0930 am on Tuesday and the maximum number of vehicles coming out of PGI was 971 vehicles i.e. 585 PCUs 1130 am-1230 pm on Tuesday. From the hourly variation plot for Gate 2 for 6 days a week, it was observed that the maximum traffic in number going inside PGI was 961 vehicles i.e. 893 PCUs 09:30 am-1030 am on Saturday and the maximum traffic in number coming out of PGI was 881 vehicles i.e. 803 PCUs 1230 pm-0130 pm on Friday. Table 3 Hourly and daily traffic volume variation of total traffic from Gate 1 and Gate 2 From the hourly variation plot for Gate 1 and Gate 2 combined for 6 days a week, it is observed that the maximum number of vehicles going inside PGI was 2520 vehicles 08:30 am-09:30 am on Tuesday and the maximum number of vehicles coming out of PGI was 1771 vehicles 11:30 am-1230 pm on Monday. COUNT HOUR DIRECTION IN OUT IN OUT IN OUT IN OUT IN OUT 07:30 am- 08:30 am 1255 439 1435 575 1331 583 840 414 1081 417 598 08:30 am- 09:30 am 1270 516 1751 638 1335 609 1231 488 1267 484 1172 09:30 am- 10:30 am 1292 598 1237 603 1421 720 1442 540 1641 567 1441 10:30 am- 11:30 am 808 543 899 644 948 647 1154 729 1295 838 910 11:30 am- 12:30 pm 918 967 880 971 770 898 783 696 848 770 716 12:30 pm- 01:30 pm 783 770 740 845 616 728 637 733 663 761 609 01:30 pm- 02:30 pm 659 561 624 571 489 627 575 634 560 634 589 02:30 pm- 03:30 pm 516 644 506 756 537 664 465 783 485 856 435 03:30 pm- 04:30 pm 354 510 381 761 343 479 359 581 352 611 364 04:30 pm- 05:30 pm 250 420 311 695 259 424 287 493 286 477 277 TOTAL VOLUME 8105 5968 8764 7059 8049 6379 7773 6091 8478 6415 7111 TOTAL PCU 7237 5380 7836 6354 7234 5766 6984 5503 7603 5832 6342 MONDAY TUESDAY WEDNESDAY THURSDAY FRIDAY COUNTHOUR DIRECTION IN OUT IN OUT IN OUT IN OUT IN OUT IN OUT 07:30 am- 08:30 am 949 454 831 401 901 440 642 372 732 387 602 376 08:30 am- 09:30 am 773 402 769 385 782 396 775 411 711 394 885 448 09:30 am- 10:30 am 572 533 594 524 594 532 776 480 652 531 961 437 10:30 am- 11:30 am 639 713 670 657 665 700 586 632 589 675 624 591 11:30 am- 12:30 pm 559 804 614 789 597 802 440 656 442 747 466 568 12:30 pm- 01:30 pm 486 803 591 824 549 828 471 747 469 881 500 621 01:30 pm- 02:30 pm 485 750 492 741 499 756 487 716 466 793 542 675 02:30 pm- 03:30 pm 434 712 473 703 464 717 395 698 389 702 425 734 03:30 pm- 04:30 pm 309 581 358 547 343 574 354 636 361 621 368 688 04:30 pm- 05:30 pm 204 521 266 459 246 509 246 489 244 477 263 522 TOTAL VOLUME 5410 6273 5658 6030 5640 6254 5172 5837 5055 6208 5636 5660 TOTAL PCU 4898 5611 5041 5424 5062 5594 4668 5235 4562 5587 5119 5080 SATURDAYMONDAY TUESDAY WEDNESDAY THURSDAY FRIDAY COUNTHOUR DIRECTION IN OUT IN OUT IN OUT IN OUT IN OUT IN OUT 07:30 am- 08:30am 2204 893 2317 976 2232 1023 1482 786 1813 804 1200 773 08:30 am- 09:30am 2043 918 2520 1023 2117 1005 2006 899 1978 878 2057 936 09:30 am- 10:30am 1864 1131 1831 1127 2015 1252 2218 1020 2293 1098 2402 935 10:30 am- 11:30am 1447 1256 1569 1301 1613 1347 1740 1361 1884 1513 1534 1224 11:30 am- 12:30pm 1477 1771 1494 1760 1367 1700 1223 1352 1290 1517 1182 1195 12:30 pm- 01:30pm 1269 1573 1331 1669 1165 1556 1108 1480 1132 1642 1109 1323 01:30 pm- 02:30pm 1144 1311 1116 1312 988 1383 1062 1350 1026 1427 1131 1329 02:30 pm- 03:30pm 950 1356 979 1459 1001 1381 860 1481 874 1558 860 1462 03:30 pm- 04:30pm 663 1091 739 1308 686 1053 713 1217 713 1232 732 1245 04:30 pm- 05:30pm 454 941 577 1154 505 933 533 982 530 954 540 1032 TOTAL VOLUME 13515 12241 14422 13089 13689 12633 12945 11928 13533 12623 12747 11454 MONDAY TUESDAY WEDNESDAY THURSDAY FRIDAY SATURDAY
  • 4. International Journal of Research in Advent Technology, Vol.3, No.7, July 2015 E-ISSN: 2321-9637 49 The composition of traffic going inside and coming out of PGI from both the gates follows almost the same trend on all days. It mainly consists of 50 percent of 4 Wheelers or Cars, 44 percent of 2- Wheelers and 6 percent of 3- Wheelers for traffic going inside and for traffic coming out the composition of traffic as observed was 50percent of 4 Wheelers or Cars, 44 percent of 2- Wheelers and 6 percent of 3- Wheelers. It can be seen from the above analysis that the composition of traffic follows the same trend for traffic going inside and coming outside of PGI. Traffic flow pattern follows almost the same trend on all the days also [12]. 3. CAPACITY AND LEVEL OF SERVICE COMPUTATION Capacity was calculated for the two roads adjoining Gate 1 (opposite to Nehru Hospital) and Gate 2 (New OPD), as these are the major roads of P.G.I. carrying maximum traffic volume. The physical features of the roads are: Road opposite to Nehru Hospital (Gate 1) has width of 10 m and New OPD road (Gate 2) has width of 9.5 m. Using the results from volume analysis, peak hour flow can be determined for both the gates for traffic going inside and coming out [1]. Table 4 Peak Hour PCUs at Gate 1 and Gate 2 We can calculate Level of Service during peak in morning and evening hours from V/C ratio. Capacity can be calculated from the reference tables for design service volume [3]. The level of service for road opposite to Nehru hospital during the peak hours approaches E as the V/C ratio is greater than 1 which is highly unacceptable. The LOS- E for the peak hour can be determined according to the V/C ratio [4] [5]. Moreover, the low speed is mandatory in this area as it is the main road connecting all the main hospitals. There are no restrictions for loading and unloading of the passengers which lead to lower level of service. Hence, very unstable flow with intolerable delays and lower running speeds on this road [2]. Similarly, the level of service for New OPD road during the peak hour approaches D with V/C ratio approaching 0.8. Hence, the road has a very unstable flow with tolerable delays and lower running speeds. This road connects the residential area and the New OPD, solower speed is mandatory. As there are no waiting restrictions on the roadway in both the directions, this leads to lower level ofservice. And the loading and unloading of the passengers is also allowed on these roads. Hence this road provides very unstable flow [10]. Table 5 Computation of V/C ratio LOCATION PERIOD TOTAL VEHICLE TOTAL PCU’S GATE NO. 1 PEAK HOUR FOR TRAFFIC COMING IN 1751 1562 PEAK HOUR FOR TRAFFIC GOING OUT 971 869 GATE NO. 2 PEAK HOUR FOR TRAFFIC COMING IN 961 893 PEAK HOUR FOR TRAFFIC GOING OUT 881 803
  • 5. International Journal of Research in Advent Technology, Vol.3, No.7, July 2015 E-ISSN: 2321-9637 50 4. CONCLUSIONS The following main conclusions have been drawn from the study: i. From the present study the maximum of 8764 vehicles i.e. 7836 PCUs going inside P.G.I. and 7059 vehicles i.e. 6354 PCUs coming out of P.G.I. on Tuesday and a minimum of 7111 vehicles i.e. 6342 PCUs going inside P.G.I. on Saturday and a minimum of 5794 vehicles i.e. 5212 PCUs coming out of P.G.I on Saturday only. ii. From the hourly variation plot for Gate 1 for 6 days (Monday to Saturday) a week, the maximum number of vehicles going inside PGI was 1751 vehicles 08:30 am- 09:30 am on Tuesday and the maximum number of vehicles coming out of PGI was 971 vehicles 11:30 am-12:30 pm on Tuesday. iii. The maximum PCUs going inside was 1562 PCUs 08:30 am-09:30 am on Tuesday and the maximum PCUs coming out was 869 PCUs 11:30 am-12:30 pm on Monday and Tuesday from Gate 1. iv. From the hourly variation plot for Gate 2 for 6 days (Monday to Saturday) a week, the maximum traffic in number going inside PGI was 961 vehicles i.e. 893 PCUs 09:30 am- 10:30 am on Saturday and the maximum traffic in number coming out of PGI was 881 vehicles i.e. 803 PCUs 12:30 pm-01:30 pm on Friday. v. The maximum PCUs going inside was 893 PCUs 08:30 am-10:30 am on Saturday and the maximum PCUs coming out was757 PCUs 12:30 pm-01:30 pm on Tuesday at Gate 2. vi. The composition of traffic going inside consists of 52percent of 4 Wheelers or Cars, 42 percent of 2- Wheelers and 6percent of 3- Wheelers and for traffic coming out the composition of traffic was 49percent of 4 Wheelers or Cars, 46percent of 2- Wheelers and 5 percent of 3- Wheelers. Traffic flow pattern follows almost the same trend on all the working days. vii. The variation of total traffic on Gate 1 and Gate 2 indicated a maximum of 14422 vehicles going inside P.G.I. on Tuesday and 13089 vehicles coming out of P.G.I. on Tuesday and a minimum of 12747 vehicles going inside P.G.I. on Saturday and a minimum of 11454 vehicles coming out of P.G.I on Saturday. viii. From the hourly variation plot for Gate 1 and Gate 2 combined for 6 days a week, it was observed that the maximum traffic in number going inside PGI was 2520 vehicles 08:30 am- 09:30 am on Tuesday and the maximum traffic in number coming out of PGI was 1771 vehicles 11:30 am-12:30 pm on Monday. ix. The level of service was computed using v/c ratio for Gate no. 1 and Gate no. 2 during the peak and it was found to be LOS- E and D respectively. This zone has very unstable flow with intolerable delays and lower running speeds on this road. REFERENCES [1] Chandra S., 2004, Capacity estimation procedure for two-lane roads under mixed traffic conditions, Journal of Indian Road Congress, Vol. 65-1, pp. 139-171. [2] Hossain, M. and Iqbal, G.A.,1999, Vehicular Headway Distribution and Free Speed Characteristics of Two-lane Two-way Highway of Bangladesh,Institution of Engineers (India) Vol. 80, pp. 77-80. [3]HCM, 2010, Highway Capacity Manual. [4] IRC:64,1990, The Indian Road Congress, Guidelines for capacity of roads in rural areas. [5] IRC:106, 1990, The Indian Road Congress, Guidelines for capacity of roads in rural areas. [6] Jalihal S.A., 2005, Traffic characteristics of India, Proceedings of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, Vol. 5, pp. 1009 – 102. [7] Kadyali L.R., 2010, Traffic Engineering and Transportation Planning, Khanna Publishers. [8] Kadyali L.R. and Lal N.B., 2012, Principles and Practices of Highway Engineering, Khanna Publishers. LOCA TION PERIO D Vol ume (PC U/hr ) (V) Wid th of road (m) No . of lan es DES IGN SER VIC E VOL UM E (C) V/ C RA TI O LEV EL OF SER VICE GATE NO. 1 PEAK HOUR FLOW (PCU) 243 1 10 3 2200 1.1 E GATE NO. 2 PEAK HOUR FLOW (PCU) 169 6 9.5 3 2100 0.8 D
  • 6. International Journal of Research in Advent Technology, Vol.3, No.7, July 2015 E-ISSN: 2321-9637 51 [9] Khanna S.K., and Justo C.E.G., 1976, Highway engineering, New Chand & Bros, Roorkee [10]Kadiyali, L.R. et al, 1991, Speed-Flow Characteristics on Indian Highways, Indian Roads Congress Journal, Vol. 52-2, New Delhi, pp. 233-262. [11]Panda Haribandhu & Pundir RS, 2002. Problems and possible solutions for better traffic management: A case study of Vadodara- Ahmedabad section of national highway eight, Research paper, Institute of Rural Management, August. [12]Sahoo, P.K., Rao, S.K. and Kumar, V.M., 1996, A Study of Traffic Flow Characteristics on Two Stretches of National Highway No. 5, Indian Highways, Vol. 24-4, Indian Roads Congress, New Delhi, pp. 11-17. [13]www.pgimer.edu.in