In this educational webinar, Dr. Timothy A. Hacker discusses strategies and experimental design of long-term, chronic cardiovascular research in rodents. Specifically, he reviews the use of implantable telemetry, imaging and complimentary technologies for cardiovascular research, highlighting when to adopt one technology versus another and the advantages and limitations of each. He shares best-practices related to data acquisition and analysis, data interpretation and how to prepare data in support of your research hypothesis. Additionally, he touches on fundamental topics relevant to all preclinical cardiovascular experimentation, such as standardization, animal care, the 3Rs and regulatory constraints.
Key topics covered during this webinar include…
- Why do some translational models correlate poorly with human disease?
- Why are chronic models important?
- Animal model and rodent strain choice
- How to choose the right tools based on your research objectives
- How to systematically approach data review and analysis and draw conclusions that support your research hypothesis
Experimental Considerations when Planning Chronic Models of Cardiovascular Disease in Rodents
1. Dr. Tim Hacker discusses experimental design, strategy,
technology, common challenges and best-practices
associated with planning long-term, chronic models
of cardiovascular disease in rodents.
Experimental Considerations
When Planning Chronic Models of
Cardiovascular Disease in Rodents
#LifeScienceWebinar #ISCxScintica
2. Timothy A. Hacker, PhD
Experimental Considerations
When Planning Chronic Models of
Cardiovascular Disease in Rodents
#LifeScienceWebinar #ISCxScintica
Cardiovascular Physiology
Core Facility
University of Wisconsin-Madison
3. InsideScientific is an online
educational environment
designed for life science
researchers.
Our goal is to aid in the sharing
and distribution of scientific
information regarding
innovative technologies,
protocols, research tools and
laboratory services
4. To access webinar content,
Q&A reports,
FAQ documents,
and information on lab
workshops,
subscribe to our mail list
5. Globally linking scientists with
precision tools for research
through expertise in science,
engineering and support.
Learn more at www.scintica.com
6. Experimental Considerations
When Planning Chronic Models of
Cardiovascular Disease in Rodents
Copyright 2018, Timothy A. Hacker and InsideScientific. All Rights Reserved
Timothy A. Hacker, PhD
email: th2@medicine.wisc.edu
Cardiovascular Physiology Core Facility
University of Wisconsin-Madison
7. Key topics covered during this webinar will include…
Why do certain translational models have a weak correlation with
the human disease? Are there intrinsic problems with the models, or are
scientists making fundamental errors?
Why are chronic models important? Why choose chronic vs. acute
in vivo procedures
Animal model and rodent strain choice
Technology Review: physiologic telemetry vs. imaging vs. non-invasive
techniques
How to systematically approach data review and analysis
8. Should mimic critical features of human disease…
1. Considerations
• Mimic the course of disease for the duration
• Mimic for a single discrete time point
• Molecular and genetic similarities
2. Limitations
• Lack of diversity
• Lack of co-morbidities
• Differences between species in cell and molecular make-up
What makes a good model?
9. • Leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the US
• Prevalence of associated risk factors such as diabetes, hypertension,
obesity, high cholesterol, inactivity and aging is increasing
Example model – Heart Failure (HF)
• Current treatments only slow the
progression of the syndrome…
(1) Beta blockers (2) Diuretics
• Thus, there is a great need to develop novel
preventative and reparative therapies
10. 1. Clinical Syndrome
• Dyspnea
• Fatigue
• Exercise intolerance
• Retention of fluid in the lungs and/or peripheral tissues
2. Fundamental Defect
• Impaired filling and/or ejection of blood from the heart
What is heart failure?
14. Structural Changes
• Ventricular dilation
• Normal or reduced wall thickness
(eccentric hypertrophy)
• Biventricular and biatrial enlargement
• AV valve regurgitation
• Increases in organ
and chamber weight
• Myocyte hypertrophy
Functional Changes
• Systolic/diastolic dysfunction
• Abnormalities of diastolic filling
• Increased diastolic and systolic wall stress
• Elevation of left and right sided filling pressures
• Activation of neurohormonal systems
• ECG
Heart Failure: Measurable Parameters
15. What Do You Need
To Measure?
1. Structure
• Echo
• MRI, CT, PET, Angiography
16. 1. Structure
• Echo
• MRI, CT, PET, Angiography
2. Function
• Pressure
• Pressure – Volume
• Doppler Flow Velocity
• mitral and aortic valve
• Ultrasound (2,3 and 4 D, strain)
• MRI, CT, Angiography
• ECG
• Ultrasonic Crystals
Mitral Inflow
Aortic
Outflow
ECG
Some Aortic Outflow Measurements:
• Heart rate
• Ejection time
• Peak/mean velocity
• Peak/mean acceleration
• Stroke distance
Some Mitral Inflow Measurements:
• E & A peak velocity
• E/A ratio
• Isovolumic contraction time
• Isovolumic relaxation time
What Do You Need
To Measure?
18. Measurements
Acute
Advantages
- Lower Cost
- Fast
- Some measures can only be
done acutely
Disadvantages
- Under anesthesia
- Some are terminal
Chronic
Advantages
- Awake
- Fewer Animals
- Normal Behavior
- Diurnal measures
- Continuous
- Less stress
Disadvantages
- Higher initial
cost for some
Snap shot vs. Movie!
19. 0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
acute Chronic- awake Chronic- asleep
Acute vs Chronic
WT TG male TG female TG treated
*
* *
*
#
#
# #
Acute studies
(under anesthesia) n = 7-8
(no significant difference between treatments)
Chronic-awake
(awake, freely moving mice n = 4)
Chronic-asleep
(sleeping mouse, no anesthesia n =4)
Columns with different superscripts
are different at p<0.01
Acute vs. Chronic Blood Pressure
21. 1. Disease model
2. Standardization = to make uniform
• Standardization of the model
• Standardization of staff
• Standardization of instrumentation
• Stratification
3. Calibration = checking against known standards
• Calibration of the model
• Calibration of staff
• Calibration of instrumentation
Fundamental considerations for successful experimental design/planning
22. 1. Disease model
2. Standardization = to make uniform
• Standardization of the model
• Standardization of staff
• Standardization of instrumentation
• Stratification
3. Calibration = checking against known standards
• Calibration of the model
• Calibration of staff
• Calibration of instrumentation
Fundamental considerations for successful experimental design/planning
4. Animals
• Strain (This is critical!)
– Transgenic colonies can drift over
time
– How many back crosses?
– What is your source of the animals?
• Sex
• Blinding/Randomization
• Proper controls
(negative and positive)
• Numbers (power calculations)
23. How long after implant should you wait before recording data?
When and how long should you record
– 24 hour recordings
– Batch recordings
– Time of day
– Post treatment
Common errors / pitfalls / limitations
– Cage changes
– Light/dark cycles
– Vibration/construction
– Temperature/humidity
– Other animals/proximately to males/females
AO pressure implants
0
50
100
150
2 3 5 7 8 9
Days Post Implant
AOpressure(mmHg)
Systolic BP
Heart Rate
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
2 3 5 7 8
Days Post Implant
Beats/min
Telemetry Data
24. How does it compare to…
• Literature
• Previous experiments
• Animals within the group
• Gold standard
• Histology/organ weight
Data Interpretation & Validation
25. • Functional measurements should include
any parameters that might alter function
HEART RATE
Time of day
Time post intervention
• How many animals did you start with?
How many are included in the analysis?
• Structural analysis should include
images and histology
Presenting data for review
26. No one model will be perfect!
Careful experimental design
Choose your models carefully
Use multiple animal models,
use co-morbidities, aged animals
Carotid Artery
27. Thank You
For additional information on the products and applications presented during
this webinar please visit www.scintica.com
Timothy A. Hacker, PhD
email: th2@medicine.wisc.edu
Cardiovascular Physiology Core Facility
University of Wisconsin-Madison