2. Outline of Today’s Presenters
• Bob Flocke – Mayor, City of Wimberley
• Andy Sansom – Executive Director, Texas State University’s River Systems
Institute
• David Baker – Executive Director, Wimberley Valley Watershed Association
• John Ashworth – Hydrogeologist, formerly with TWDB
• Doug Wierman – Hydrogeologist, formerly with HTGCD
• Rene Barker – Hydrogeologist, Edwards Aquifer Research & Data Center
• Eric Eskelund – Mayor, City of Woodcreek
• David K. Langford – Kendall County Landowner, retired CEO of the Texas
Wildlife Association and Hill Country Alliance (HCA) Advisory Board
• Malcolm Harris – Cypress Creek Landowner, Vice President, Wimberley
Valley Watershed Association
• Steve Klepfer –Executive Director, Friends of Blue Hole, Wimberley
Business owner and Former Mayor of Wimberley
6. WVWA Board of Directors
Jack Hollon, President
Malcolm Harris, Vice President
Pokey Rehmet, Treasurer
Melinda Gumbert, Secretary
Dorothy Knight
Jeff Vasgaard
DuAnne Redus
7. Wimberley Valley Watershed Association
MISSION
• Engage the community in land and water stewardship at
the Jacob’s Well Natural Area through education, research
and personal experience to sustain the health of our
watersheds and aquifers.
• Advocate for clean, clear flowing streams
and the equitable allocation of water for current and
future needs of the Wimberley Valley.
8. A 30 ft. average drawn-down of the Trinity
Aquifer in GMA-9 would lead to a major
degradation of economic, ecological and quality
of life conditions for the Wimberley Valley.
2008 2011
9.
10. A Desired Future Condition is…
“the
desired, quantified
condition of
groundwater
resources…” (such
as water
levels, water
quality, spring
flows, or volumes)
11. Background to DFC Process
Groundwater
Laws/Regulations Availability
(i.e. HB 1763) Modeling
Modeled
Policy + Science = Available
Groundwater
Existing water use New
Public Input Groundwater
(permitted + exempt)
Desired Future Permits
Condition (DFC)
12. Public Support for Prudent
Groundwater Management
• “The most prevalent stakeholder comment received by GMA9 was
the desire and need to manage the aquifers in such a way as to
"protect spring flow and base flow to creeks and rivers." This
sentiment was supported by a diverse group of stakeholders
including: landowners, state and local government
representatives, environmental organizations, recreational
interests, local businesses, and wildlife organizations.
[http://www.blancocountygroundwater.org/gma9/Background%20Information%20o
n%20Edwards%20DFC%20Appeal.pdf]
• The second concern most often heard was, in summary, "do not rush
into setting a DFC, give due consideration to all aspects of the aquifer
system, and do what is best to provide for sustainable water for those
who rely on groundwater from GMA 9.”
[http://www.hillcountryalliance.org/HCA/DecidingFutureCondition]
13. Local Conditions
In 2006, drinking wells went dry across the Hill Country in
the Trinity Aquifer, and 2006 wasn't a particularly dry
year (R. Slade 2006). 2006 streamflow was the lowest
recorded in the history of gauges in
this region – but remember this
wasn't a particularly dry
period based on long term data.
In 2009, 42 drinking-water wells
were reported going dry
14.
15. Summary of Petition to TWDB
• Aquifer mining is inherently unsustainable
and goes against groundwater districts’ stated
management goals
• Aquifer mining is already occurring with
current pumping
• The adopted DFC will have
economic, property rights, and public health
impacts for well owners, local economies and
recreational users
• The adopted DFC will have environmental
impacts on springs and baseflows
16. Summary of Petition to TWDB
• The GAM model can only show regional
trends and is unable to accurately predict
local impacts on individual springs and wells
• No systematic process exists for monitoring
and applying a regional and multi-year
average DFC that combines three very
different aquifer systems into one average
drawdown value
• Exempt users have been and will continue to
be impacted by additional permitted pumping
allowed by the adopted DFC
17. Economic Impacts
• Reduced stream flow could cause a significant drop in
property values for properties along Cypress Creek
– Up to 45% reduction in value
– Resulting in a loss to landowners of between $8.25 and
$14.9 million
– Corresponding losses in property tax revenues (RSI 2010)
• Public and private investment in riverine parks and
nature preserves would be jeopardized by reduced
flows.
– Public investment in riverine preserves, Jacob’s Well
Natural Area, and Blue Hole Regional Park is over $13
million.
• Revenues from river recreation are multiplied by over
200% as spending in local economies (Cordell et al. 1990)
– River recreation in western Hays county dependent on
baseflows to springs and creeks
18. Going Forward
• We as a community need to find ways to accommodate
growth without losing our springs and rivers.
• WVWA recommends that local
stakeholders, TWDB, GMA9, and the HTGCD lead a
collaborative process to:
– Define a management area for Jacob’s Well and Cypress Creek
– Bring together affected parties to adopt a DFC for that area that
addresses
• Economic and environmental importance of springs and rivers
• Local impacts to existing well owners
• Desired future conditions during drought periods
– Develop the strategies needed for alternative water supply
(rainwater, conservation,Lower Trinity,surface water, etc.) so the
new DFC will be achievable
– Ensure that GCDs have the necessary tools to manage the
aquifer
20. Regional Perspective
• Managing groundwater levels to maintain
spring and base flows
• Current DFC
combines 3 very
different aquifer
systems into a
single average
decline
21. Douglas A. Wierman, P.G.
Hydrogeologist, formerly with Hays Trinity
Groundwater Conservation District
22. Presentation Topics
• Discussion of regional declines in water levels in the
Hill County Trinity Aquifer
• Discussion of local Hays County water level
declines/aquifer mining and impacts on sustainable
aquifer development
• Quantification of impact of declining water levels on
flow from Jacob’s Well
• Exempt wells and their impact on sustainable aquifer
development
23. Current Use and Modeled Available
Groundwater for Scenario 6 – 30’ of Drawdown
• 2008 Baseline – ~5800 AFY
• 2010 MAG - ~9100 AFY
• MAG represents > 50% increase in pumpage
Data Sources:
GAM Task 10-031: Supplement to GAM Task 10-005
Draft GMA Run 10-050 MAG
25. Water Level Trend Data Sources
• Texas Water Development Board, Report 379
Changes in Water Levels in Texas, 1995 to 2005
• BSEACD, Report #2010-0501 Spring 2009
Potentiometric Map of the Middle Trinity
Aquifer in Groundwater Management Area
9, Central Texas
• HTGCD Water Level Monitoring Data
http://haysgroundwater.com/monitored-
wells-data
26. Texas Water Development Board
Report 379
Changes in Water Levels in Texas,
1995 to 2005
by
Radu Boghici, P.G.
July 2011
28. SPRING 2009 POTENTIOMETRIC MAP OF THE MIDDLE
TRINITY AQUIFER IN GROUNDWATER MANAGEMENT
AREA 9, CENTRAL TEXAS
Brian B. Hunt, P.G., and Brian A. Smith, Ph.D., P.G.,
Barton Springs/Edwards Aquifer Conservation District
A COLLABORATIVE REPORT WITH:
Ronald G. Fieseler, P.G. Blanco-Pedernales Groundwater Conservation District
Doug Wierman, P.G., and Wesley Schumacher Hays-Trinity Groundwater
Conservation District
Micah Voulgaris Cow Creek Groundwater Conservation District
George Wissmann Trinity Glen Rose Groundwater Conservation District
Gene Williams Headwaters Groundwater Conservation District
David Jeffery, P.G. Bandera County River Authority & Groundwater District
Paul Tybor, P.G. Hill Country Underground Water Conservation District
David Caldwell Medina County Groundwater Conservation District
29.
30.
31. Water Level Monitoring Data
Hays Trinity Groundwater Conservation
District Water Level Monitoring Program
32. Water Levels -Mt Blady Well Middle Trinity
30º 00' 58'' North Depth 400 feet
98º 07' 01'' West
January 1999 - December 2009
Elevation 939 feet
880
best fit trendline
decline ~1.3 feet/yr
860
Water Elevation (msl)
840
820
800
780
Water Level Data Source: http://haysgroundwater.com/wellgraph?idWell=1299
33. Water Level Data Source: http://haysgroundwater.com/wellgraph?idWell=1289
37. Graham Well Trend Projected Five Years
934
933
Feet Above MSL
932
931
930 Trend Line
929
928 9/2016
927
926
10/2005
10/2006
11/2007
11/2008
12/2009
12/2010
Date
38. Summary of Water Level Trends at
Current (~5800 AFY) Conditions
• Current Aquifer Depletion or Aquifer Mining
– TWDB – generally declining levels
– BSEACD/GMA 9 – ~1-4 feet/yr declines
– HTGCD – ~1.3-3.5 feet/year declines
• The DFC for HTGCD predicts an average of 19 ft of drawdown
in 50 years for the HTGCD
• However at these rates, a decline of 19 ft will be achieved in
5.5 – 19 years under current pumping rates and climatic
conditions
• To achieve the DFC by 2060, current pumping would have to
be significantly decreased and alternative sources developed
39. Summary of Jacob’s Well
• Due to the unique hydrogeologic setting of, 2-3 feet
of drawdown in the vicinty of Jacob’s Well and
Cypress Creek causes flow to cease under current
pumping conditions
• Increasing pumpage will likely turning Jacob’s Well
into an intermittent spring
40. Exempt Wells
• HTGCD enabling legislation exempts from
regulation all domestic use wells using less
than 25,000 gpd
• MAG allows for increase of exempt wells from
1484 AFY in 2010 to 4108 AFY in 2060, or a
280% increase
• Without any new permitted wells, pumping
will increase from 5800 AFY to 8400 AFY and
cause further mining of the aquifer
41. Summary
• The DFC for the HTGCD portion of GMA 9 will
have the following impacts:
– Current pumping will reduce water levels to the
2060 MAG level in less than 20 years, and likely
closer to 10 years
– Water level declines of less than 3 feet cause
Jacob’s well/Cypress Creek to stop flowing
– Projected current water level trends indicate
Jacob’s Well will become an intermittent spring
– MAG is unachievable due to exempt well growth
without a reduction in total pumping
42. Rene A. Barker, P.G.
Hydrogeologist, Edwards Aquifer
Research & Data Center
43. PRESENTATION TOPICS
– Regional & Average Annual Versus Local & Short Term
– Model’s “Scale of Application”
– Effects of 30-DFC on Surface Water & Edwards Aquifer
44.
45.
46.
47.
48.
49.
50.
51.
52.
53.
54.
55.
56.
57.
58.
59.
60.
61. From TWDB Report 377 (Jones et al., 2011)
①“This model is most accurate in assessing regional-scale groundwater
issues, such as predicting aquifer-wide water level changes and trends in
the groundwater budget … on an annual timescale.
②Accuracy and applicability of the model decrease when moving from
addressing regional- to local-scale issues because of limitations of the
information used in model construction and the model cell size that
determines spatial resolution of the model.
③Consequently, this model is not likely to accurately predict water level
declines associated with a single well or spring because (1) these water
level declines depend on site specific hydrologic properties not included in
detail in regional-scale models and (2) the cell size used in the model is
too large to resolve changes in water levels that occur over relatively
short distances.”
71. Summary of Petition to TWDB
• Aquifer mining is inherently unsustainable
and goes against groundwater districts’ stated
management goals
• Aquifer mining is already occurring with
current pumping
• The adopted DFC will have
economic, property rights, and public health
impacts for well owners, local economies and
recreational users
• The adopted DFC will have environmental
impacts on springs and baseflows
72. Summary of Petition to TWDB
• The GAM model can only show regional
trends and is unable to accurately predict
local impacts on individual springs and wells
• No systematic process exists for monitoring
and applying a regional and multi-year
average DFC that combines three very
different aquifer systems into one average
drawdown value
• Exempt users have been and will continue to
be impacted by additional permitted pumping
allowed by the adopted DFC
73. In summary, a 30 ft. average drawn-down of the
Trinity Aquifer in GMA-9 would lead to a major
degradation of economic, ecological and quality
of life conditions for the Wimberley Valley.
Photo courtesy of Hill Country Alliance
Photo courtesy of David Baker
74. Summary & Conclusions
• We must find a way to accommodate growth while maintaining
baseflows to springs and rivers.
• Recommend we begin a collaborative process that will
– Define a special management area for Jacob’s Well and Cypress Creek
– Bring together affected parties to adopt a DFC for this area that
addresses economic and environmental importance of springs and
rivers
• Create a DFC that specifically addresses:
– Local impacts to existing well owners
– Drought conditions
– Springs and baseflows
• Develop the strategies needed for alternative water supply
(rainwater, conservation, Lower Trinity, surface water, etc.) so the
new DFC will be achievable
• Ensure GCD’s have the necessary tools to manage the aquifer
75. We do not inherit the earth from our ancestors,
we borrow it from our children.
~Native American Proverb
Notes de l'éditeur
The DFC process is the first time in groundwater planning in Texas that stakeholders have been asked across an entire aquifer system what they want the future of their aquifer to look like.A lot more goes into both the Policy and Science boxes than what is shown here, it is a very complex process.To summarize:Regional planning meetings (9 total) have taken place of groundwater districts, with research and discussion to answer what scenarios are Achievable, Acceptable, Desirable, and ReasonableTWDB, primarily through the use of groundwater models, helps regions determine maximum amount of water which can be pumped and still achieve a DFC -- this volume of water is known as the Modeled Available Groundwater, or MAG. With public input, individual local GCDs then develop management policies to permit groundwater withdrawal up to the MAG.
30 ft average overall, but this map shows how the drawdowns in certain areas will be much higher (Rene will elaborate)91% of platted lots are 10 acres or less90% of lots in western Hays County are still undeveloped
AQUIFER MINING IS INHERENTLY UNSUSTAINABLE “Drawdown” is not the issue. The problem is long-term water level DECLINE—indicative of permanent dewatering of the Trinity Aquifer. One of the earliest threats to sustainable yield is groundwater mining, as indicated by long-term water-level decline. A continuation of unabated extraction of groundwater from Trinity Aquifer storage will eventually deplete the aquifer to the extent it is incapable of supplying water in any reasonable economical or physical sense. i.e. there will be no recovering groundwater levels from a permanent decline.AQUIFER MINING IS OCCURRING UNDER CURRENT PUMPING Aquifer level declines of up to 150 feet have been recorded in western Hays and Blanco Counties from 1975 to 2009. Rates of decline are estimated between 1 and 3.5 feet per year. At these rates, an average 19 ft of drawdown (projected in 50 years with >50% increase in pumping) will actually be achieved in 5.5 – 19 years under current pumping rates and climatic conditions.The effects of historical and current rates of pumping have already tapped the threshold of what most scientific literature considers aquifer dewatering or groundwater mining—in other words: unsustainable development. TWDB’s GAM results indicate that the 30-foot DFC will only exacerbate existing problems. In addition to the expense of having to deepen wells and pump water from deeper depths, such problems include the likelihood of wells, springs, and baseflow drying up—conditions observed during recent (post-1987) droughts that were caused by events far less severe than several droughts known to have occurred before 1960.IMPACTS ON WELL OWNERS/PROPERTY RIGHTS HOLDERS The GAM model underestimates the actual, site-specific drawdown that results from the pumping of individual wells within the actual aquifer. Therefore, in heavily pumped areas, it is likely that individual wells and springs will pump dry or cease flowing under conditions far less severe than those simulated for the same area. For this reason, it is highly likely that the adopted regional DFC will negatively affect the reliability of private wells with locally impacted groundwater levels. The fact that it is impossible for anyone or any agency to predict with any degree of assurance the actual number, location, and longevity of these dried up wells and springs makes the 30-foot DFC inconsistent with sound water-resource management, given the sheer number of environmental and economic concerns and unknowns it creates.Dry drinking wells and groundwater declines are a public health and safety threat The drying up of springs and rivers also jeopardizes the substantial public and private investment in riverine property parks and nature preserves such as Blue Hole Regional Park and Jacob’s Well Natural Area. A dry creek would reduce property values by 25%-45%.
COARSE RESOLUTION OF MODEL/IT IS INAPPROPRIATE TO USE A REGIONAL AVERAGE GOAL TO DICTATE LOCAL POLICYthe TWDB modelers characterize the GAM model’s use as limited to a “regional scale of application.” In other words, the simulated conditions used to formulate the 30-foot DFC are not necessarily consistent with desired local and short-term conditions. Although the Hill Country GAM is calibrated to reproduce observed historical conditions, this fact alone does not insure that the model is verified—in other words: capable of projecting future water level, springflow and water-budget conditions within an appropriate degree of expectation.It appears unwise and inconsistent within the concept of sustainable groundwater development to use such large-scale model output to justify pumping increases that are simulated to cause an additional 30 feet of regionalized, average-annual rates of water-level decline.We need to determine how the effects of groundwater development can be most effectively monitored, analyzed, and controlled to maximize the efficiency of future water production
AQUIFER MINING IS INHERENTLY UNSUSTAINABLE “Drawdown” is not the issue. The problem is long-term water level DECLINE—indicative of permanent dewatering of the Trinity Aquifer. One of the earliest threats to sustainable yield is groundwater mining, as indicated by long-term water-level decline. A continuation of unabated extraction of groundwater from Trinity Aquifer storage will eventually deplete the aquifer to the extent it is incapable of supplying water in any reasonable economical or physical sense. i.e. there will be no recovering groundwater levels from a permanent decline.AQUIFER MINING IS OCCURRING UNDER CURRENT PUMPING Aquifer level declines of up to 150 feet have been recorded in western Hays and Blanco Counties from 1975 to 2009. Rates of decline are estimated between 1 and 3.5 feet per year. At these rates, an average 19 ft of drawdown (projected in 50 years with >50% increase in pumping) will actually be achieved in 5.5 – 19 years under current pumping rates and climatic conditions.The effects of historical and current rates of pumping have already tapped the threshold of what most scientific literature considers aquifer dewatering or groundwater mining—in other words: unsustainable development. TWDB’s GAM results indicate that the 30-foot DFC will only exacerbate existing problems. In addition to the expense of having to deepen wells and pump water from deeper depths, such problems include the likelihood of wells, springs, and baseflow drying up—conditions observed during recent (post-1987) droughts that were caused by events far less severe than several droughts known to have occurred before 1960.IMPACTS ON WELL OWNERS/PROPERTY RIGHTS HOLDERS The GAM model underestimates the actual, site-specific drawdown that results from the pumping of individual wells within the actual aquifer. Therefore, in heavily pumped areas, it is likely that individual wells and springs will pump dry or cease flowing under conditions far less severe than those simulated for the same area. For this reason, it is highly likely that the adopted regional DFC will negatively affect the reliability of private wells with locally impacted groundwater levels. The fact that it is impossible for anyone or any agency to predict with any degree of assurance the actual number, location, and longevity of these dried up wells and springs makes the 30-foot DFC inconsistent with sound water-resource management, given the sheer number of environmental and economic concerns and unknowns it creates.Dry drinking wells and groundwater declines are a public health and safety threat The drying up of springs and rivers also jeopardizes the substantial public and private investment in riverine property parks and nature preserves such as Blue Hole Regional Park and Jacob’s Well Natural Area. A dry creek would reduce property values by 25%-45%.
COARSE RESOLUTION OF MODEL/IT IS INAPPROPRIATE TO USE A REGIONAL AVERAGE GOAL TO DICTATE LOCAL POLICYthe TWDB modelers characterize the GAM model’s use as limited to a “regional scale of application.” In other words, the simulated conditions used to formulate the 30-foot DFC are not necessarily consistent with desired local and short-term conditions. Although the Hill Country GAM is calibrated to reproduce observed historical conditions, this fact alone does not insure that the model is verified—in other words: capable of projecting future water level, springflow and water-budget conditions within an appropriate degree of expectation.It appears unwise and inconsistent within the concept of sustainable groundwater development to use such large-scale model output to justify pumping increases that are simulated to cause an additional 30 feet of regionalized, average-annual rates of water-level decline.We need to determine how the effects of groundwater development can be most effectively monitored, analyzed, and controlled to maximize the efficiency of future water production