SlideShare une entreprise Scribd logo
1  sur  4
Télécharger pour lire hors ligne
Graphical Results by Question



                                Turning Graphical Results by Question

Session Name: New Session 11-7-2012 3-42 PM
Created: 11/12/2012 1:25 PM
                                                                                                                   12.8%                    5.1% 0%

1.) Which image best describes how you feel today…
(multiple choice)                                             Responses

Happy                                                        32     82.05%                                                                                              82%
Indifferent                                                   5     12.82%
Sad                                                           2      5.13%
Angry                                                         0         0%
Totals                                                       39      100%


                                                                                                                            Happy           Indifferent       Sad       Angry



                                                                                                                                                                      20.5%
                                                                                                                 41%


                                                                                                                                               10.3%
2.) How do you compare to MTO - which sector are you                                                                                                                                     15.4%
in? (multiple choice)                                         Responses
                                                                                                                                                                                        0%
Municipal                                                     8     20.51%                                              2.6%                                                    10.3%
Academic (University/College)                                 6     15.38%
School Board                                                  0         0%                                     Municipal                                  Academic (University/College)
Health Care                                                   4     10.26%
                                                                                                               School Board                               Health Care
Broader Public Sector                                         4     10.26%
Private Sector                                                1      2.56%                                     Broader Public Sector                      Private Sector
Federal/Provincial                                           16     41.03%
                                                                                                               Federal/Provincial
Totals                                                       39      100%




                                                                                                                                            36.8% 2.6%        0%        5.3% 2.6%
                                                                                                                        23.7%
3.) How many employees work for your organization?                                                                                                                                7.9%
(multiple choice)                                             Responses
                                                                                                                                                   18.4%
1 to 9                                                        0      2.63%
10 to 24                                                      2      5.26%
25 to 99                                                      1      2.63%
100 to 249                                                    3      7.89%
250 to 499                                                    7     18.42%
500 to 999                                                    9     23.68%                                     1 to 9            10 to 24              25 to 99            100 to 249
1000 to 2499                                                 14     36.84%
2500 +                                                        1      2.63%                                     250 to 499        500 to 999            1000 to 2499        2500 +
Totals                                                       38      100%



                                                                                                                    17.7%                   6.4%      8.1%

                                                                                                          1.6%                                                  32.3%
4.) Other than CPPC which Organization(s) do you belong                                                                                         21%
                                                                                                           6.4%
to? Pick as many as you would like! (multiple choice)         Responses
                                                                                                          4.8%
OPBA                                                          5      8.06%                                   0% 1.6%
OIPMAC                                                       20     32.26%
NIGP                                                         13     20.97%
                                                                                                   OPBA                               OIPMAC                            NIGP
OECM                                                          1      1.61%
CMC                                                           0         0%                         OECM                               CMC                               HSCN
HSCN                                                          3      4.84%                         Construction Association           ISM                               Other
Construction Association                                      4      6.45%
ISM                                                           1      1.61%                         None
Other                                                        11     17.74%
None                                                          4      6.45%
Totals                                                       62      100%



                                                                                                                        34.2%                                 23.7%
5.) How many competitive bids did your group issue in
2011? (multiple choice)                                       Responses
                                                                                                                    10.5%                                                29%
1 to 49                                                       9     23.68%
50 to 99                                                     11     28.95%
100 to 149                                                    1      2.63%
150 to 199                                                    4     10.53%
Greater than 200                                             13     34.21%
Totals                                                       38       100%                                                     2.6%



                                                                                                     1 to 49       50 to 99       100 to 149              150 to 199        Greater than 200




Confidential
Gerald Ford: grford@qcsolver.com                                                                                                                                                                  Page 1
                                                                                     14/11/2012                                                                            Arthur Skuja: ASkuja@merx.com
Graphical Results by Question




                                                                                                                               27%                      24.3%
                                                                                                0%
6.) On average how many vendor performance
evaluations do you do per year? (multiple choice)            Responses
                                                                                                                                                           37.8%
None                                                         9    24.32%
1 to 10                                                     14    37.84%                    10.8%
11 to 25                                                     4    10.81%
26 to 49                                                     0        0%
50+                                                         10    27.03%
Totals                                                      37     100%
                                                                                                                   None        1 to 10       11 to 25     26 to 49        50+




                                                                                                                                     8.2%                  17.3%
                                                                                                                17.3%
7.) Which tools or methods do you use? Pick as many as                                                                                                                           16.3%
you would like! (multiple choice)                            Responses                                               17.3%
                                                                                                                                         8.2%           15.3%

Checklists                                                  17    17.35%
Forms                                                       16    16.33%
Templates                                                   15    15.31%
User Guides & Manuals                                        8     8.16%
Progress meetings                                           17    17.35%                                   Checklists                            Forms
Performance documentation                                   17    17.35%
3rd Party verification                                       8     8.16%                                   Templates                             User Guides & Manuals
Totals                                                      98     100%                                    Progress meetings                     Performance documentation
                                                                                                           3rd Party verification




                                                                                                                        9.2%          8.2%       10.2%
                                                                                                                 1%                                               9.2%
8.) What triggers an evaluation? (multiple choice)           Responses

Periodic                                                    10    10.20%
Budget Threshold                                             9     9.18%                               19.4%                                                                    19.4%
Contract performance                                        19    19.39%
Project profile                                              6     6.12%
New vendor                                                                                                             11.2%                     6.1%          6.1%
                                                             6     6.12%
Project complexity                                          11    11.22%                             Periodic                     Budget Threshold               Contract performance
Client Dissatisfaction                                      19    19.39%
Repeat vendors                                               1     1.02%                             Project profile              New vendor                     Project complexity
Length of Engagement                                         9     9.18%                             Client Dissatisfaction       Repeat vendors                 Length of Engagement
Every Project                                                8     8.16%
Totals                                                      98     100%                              Every Project




9.) On a scale from 1 to 5, what is the average score you                                                                                3.1%      6.2%
                                                                                                                                                                       9.4%
give to your contractors when you do evaluations?
(multiple choice)                                            Responses                                          40.6%

Poor                                                         2     6.25%                                                                                               40.6%
Acceptable                                                   3     9.38%
Standard                                                    13    40.62%
Good                                                        13    40.62%
Excellent                                                    1     3.12%
Totals                                                      32     100%


                                                                                                             Poor        Acceptable         Standard      Good          Excellent




10.) What is important for an effective engagement?                                                                      18.1% 5.7%                      23%
                                                             Responses                                                                                          5.6%
(priority ranking)
                                                                                                                  12.2%
                                                                                                                                                                5.1%
Effective communication throughout engagement               200   22.96%
                                                                                                                         10.6%                           19.8%
Quality of resources                                         49    5.63%
Availability of resources to carry out contra...             44    5.05%                                         Effective communication throughout engagement
Quality of the final deliverables                           172   19.75%
Providing value added services                               92   10.56%                                         Quality of resources
Maintaining timelines/deadlines                             106   12.17%                                         Availability of resources to carry out contra...
Budget/cost control                                         158   18.14%
Having a vendor contact for dispute resolutio...             50    5.74%                                         Quality of the final deliverables
Totals                                                      871    100%                                          Providing value added services
                                                                                                                 Maintaining timelines/deadlines




Confidential
Gerald Ford: grford@qcsolver.com                                                                                                                                                               Page 2
                                                                                   14/11/2012                                                                           Arthur Skuja: ASkuja@merx.com
Graphical Results by Question




11.) What are your greatest challenges to having an
                                                                                                                    12.8%                             31.9%
effective VPM! (multiple choice)                            Responses
                                                                                                          21.3%
Not enough time                                             15   31.91%
End user input difficult to get                             12   25.53%                                     0%
Poor systems                                                 4    8.51%                                      8.5%
Not required                                                 0       0%                                                                       25.5%
Missing linkage between contract and performa...            10   21.28%                                     Not enough time
Comparative Consistency                                      6   12.77%
Totals                                                      47    100%                                      End user input difficult to get
                                                                                                            Poor systems
                                                                                                            Not required
                                                                                                            Missing linkage between contract and performa...
                                                                                                            Comparative Consistency


12.) Is the use of bonding a viable alternative to vendor
performance management? (multiple choice)                   Responses

Yes                                                          9      25%
No                                                          11   30.56%                                                                         25%
                                                                                                           44.4%
Depends                                                     16   44.44%
Totals                                                      36    100%
                                                                                                                                                      30.6%




                                                                                                                         Yes    No     Depends
13.) Do you share performance results with vendors?
(multiple choice)                                           Responses

Yes                                                         25   80.65%
No                                                           6   19.35%
Totals                                                      31    100%                                                19.4%


                                                                                                                                                      80.6%




                                                                                                                                Yes    No
14.) Do you tie VPM data to proposal evaluations and
vendor selection? (multiple choice)                         Responses

Proposals                                                    2    6.90%                                                                6.9%
Evaluations                                                  7   24.14%                                      41.4%                                       24.1%
Both                                                         8   27.59%
Neither                                                     12   41.38%
Totals                                                      29    100%                                                                        27.6%




                                                                                                            Proposals       Evaluations        Both     Neither




Confidential
Gerald Ford: grford@qcsolver.com                                                                                                                                                     Page 3
                                                                                  14/11/2012                                                                  Arthur Skuja: ASkuja@merx.com
Graphical Results by Question




15.) Do you tie vendor qualification to specific
procurements or a general work or product category?
(multiple choice)                                     Responses
                                                                                                                          10%
Specific                                              21     70%                                      20%
General                                                6     20%
Product Category                                       3     10%                                                                                        70%
Totals                                                30    100%




                                                                                                             Specific    General       Product Category


16.) And how do you feel now? (multiple choice)       Responses

Happy                                                 18   51.43%
Indifferent                                            6   17.14%                                                       14.3%
Sad                                                    6   17.14%                                   17.1%
                                                                                                                                                          51.4%
Angry                                                  5   14.29%
Totals                                                35    100%                                            17.1%




                                                                                                              Happy      Indifferent    Sad     Angry




Confidential
Gerald Ford: grford@qcsolver.com                                                                                                                                           Page 4
                                                                            14/11/2012                                                              Arthur Skuja: ASkuja@merx.com

Contenu connexe

Tendances

Delvinia Digital Diseases Presentation Smei
Delvinia Digital Diseases Presentation SmeiDelvinia Digital Diseases Presentation Smei
Delvinia Digital Diseases Presentation SmeiDelvinia
 
Jens Schulte-Bockum
Jens Schulte-BockumJens Schulte-Bockum
Jens Schulte-Bockumtheappeffect
 
Bestinver
BestinverBestinver
BestinverRankia
 
AD spending and new media Internet and Web measurement
AD spending and new mediaInternet and Web measurementAD spending and new mediaInternet and Web measurement
AD spending and new media Internet and Web measurementsergejsantos
 
It's Digital, but is it Personal?
It's Digital, but is it Personal?It's Digital, but is it Personal?
It's Digital, but is it Personal?dunnhumby
 
Michael Stoner - swissnexSF presentation
Michael Stoner - swissnexSF presentationMichael Stoner - swissnexSF presentation
Michael Stoner - swissnexSF presentationswissnex San Francisco
 
Raddon Chart of the Day January 24, 2013
Raddon Chart of the Day January 24, 2013Raddon Chart of the Day January 24, 2013
Raddon Chart of the Day January 24, 2013Raddon Financial Group
 
State Policies Expanding Dependent Coverage to Young Adults in Private Health...
State Policies Expanding Dependent Coverage to Young Adults in Private Health...State Policies Expanding Dependent Coverage to Young Adults in Private Health...
State Policies Expanding Dependent Coverage to Young Adults in Private Health...soder145
 
Datos del PREP que muestran una gráfica espejo entre AMLO y el PAN
Datos del PREP que muestran una gráfica espejo entre AMLO y el PANDatos del PREP que muestran una gráfica espejo entre AMLO y el PAN
Datos del PREP que muestran una gráfica espejo entre AMLO y el PANtoliro
 
Sisseton Study Circle Results
Sisseton Study Circle ResultsSisseton Study Circle Results
Sisseton Study Circle Resultsguesta69363
 
Hdfclife q4 final
Hdfclife q4 finalHdfclife q4 final
Hdfclife q4 finalvikram745
 
Pricing Success in an Inflationary Economy
Pricing Success in an Inflationary EconomyPricing Success in an Inflationary Economy
Pricing Success in an Inflationary EconomyG3 Communications
 
Edelman Social Entertainment Survey Results
Edelman Social Entertainment Survey ResultsEdelman Social Entertainment Survey Results
Edelman Social Entertainment Survey ResultsEdelman_UK
 
'Building for a Rapidly Evolving Mobile Future' Джефф Мориарти, вице-президен...
'Building for a Rapidly Evolving Mobile Future' Джефф Мориарти, вице-президен...'Building for a Rapidly Evolving Mobile Future' Джефф Мориарти, вице-президен...
'Building for a Rapidly Evolving Mobile Future' Джефф Мориарти, вице-президен...newreporter
 

Tendances (20)

Delvinia Digital Diseases Presentation Smei
Delvinia Digital Diseases Presentation SmeiDelvinia Digital Diseases Presentation Smei
Delvinia Digital Diseases Presentation Smei
 
Jens Schulte-Bockum
Jens Schulte-BockumJens Schulte-Bockum
Jens Schulte-Bockum
 
Bestinver
BestinverBestinver
Bestinver
 
AD spending and new media Internet and Web measurement
AD spending and new mediaInternet and Web measurementAD spending and new mediaInternet and Web measurement
AD spending and new media Internet and Web measurement
 
It's Digital, but is it Personal?
It's Digital, but is it Personal?It's Digital, but is it Personal?
It's Digital, but is it Personal?
 
Axp 2011 csbar_market
Axp 2011 csbar_marketAxp 2011 csbar_market
Axp 2011 csbar_market
 
Michael Stoner - swissnexSF presentation
Michael Stoner - swissnexSF presentationMichael Stoner - swissnexSF presentation
Michael Stoner - swissnexSF presentation
 
Ford ka case
Ford ka caseFord ka case
Ford ka case
 
Raddon Chart of the Day January 24, 2013
Raddon Chart of the Day January 24, 2013Raddon Chart of the Day January 24, 2013
Raddon Chart of the Day January 24, 2013
 
Convention southstudy2011
Convention southstudy2011Convention southstudy2011
Convention southstudy2011
 
State of Social Media: 2011
State of Social Media: 2011State of Social Media: 2011
State of Social Media: 2011
 
State Policies Expanding Dependent Coverage to Young Adults in Private Health...
State Policies Expanding Dependent Coverage to Young Adults in Private Health...State Policies Expanding Dependent Coverage to Young Adults in Private Health...
State Policies Expanding Dependent Coverage to Young Adults in Private Health...
 
Jh encouters presentation
Jh encouters presentationJh encouters presentation
Jh encouters presentation
 
Datos del PREP que muestran una gráfica espejo entre AMLO y el PAN
Datos del PREP que muestran una gráfica espejo entre AMLO y el PANDatos del PREP que muestran una gráfica espejo entre AMLO y el PAN
Datos del PREP que muestran una gráfica espejo entre AMLO y el PAN
 
Sisseton Study Circle Results
Sisseton Study Circle ResultsSisseton Study Circle Results
Sisseton Study Circle Results
 
Hdfclife q4 final
Hdfclife q4 finalHdfclife q4 final
Hdfclife q4 final
 
Pricing Success in an Inflationary Economy
Pricing Success in an Inflationary EconomyPricing Success in an Inflationary Economy
Pricing Success in an Inflationary Economy
 
Global Innovation, Secondary Education and Privatisation
Global Innovation, Secondary Education and PrivatisationGlobal Innovation, Secondary Education and Privatisation
Global Innovation, Secondary Education and Privatisation
 
Edelman Social Entertainment Survey Results
Edelman Social Entertainment Survey ResultsEdelman Social Entertainment Survey Results
Edelman Social Entertainment Survey Results
 
'Building for a Rapidly Evolving Mobile Future' Джефф Мориарти, вице-президен...
'Building for a Rapidly Evolving Mobile Future' Джефф Мориарти, вице-президен...'Building for a Rapidly Evolving Mobile Future' Джефф Мориарти, вице-президен...
'Building for a Rapidly Evolving Mobile Future' Джефф Мориарти, вице-президен...
 

Similaire à Vendor Performance Management survey results nov 7th

Food security in Martadi VDC of Bajura district, FWDR Nepal
Food security in Martadi VDC of Bajura district, FWDR NepalFood security in Martadi VDC of Bajura district, FWDR Nepal
Food security in Martadi VDC of Bajura district, FWDR Nepalbasudevupadhyay
 
Social Business Survey - Summary of Responses
Social Business Survey - Summary of ResponsesSocial Business Survey - Summary of Responses
Social Business Survey - Summary of ResponsesJessica Hibbard
 
Antonio Donini - Civ-mil and the future of Humanitarian Action
Antonio Donini - Civ-mil and the future of Humanitarian ActionAntonio Donini - Civ-mil and the future of Humanitarian Action
Antonio Donini - Civ-mil and the future of Humanitarian ActionAustralian Civil-Military Centre
 
The KPI's of job board Success
The KPI's of job board SuccessThe KPI's of job board Success
The KPI's of job board SuccessEcom Digital
 
Survey results
Survey resultsSurvey results
Survey resultsdegliwe
 
Mobilize your creativity - Eyal Rabinovich.docx
Mobilize your creativity - Eyal Rabinovich.docxMobilize your creativity - Eyal Rabinovich.docx
Mobilize your creativity - Eyal Rabinovich.docxDevGAMM Conference
 
Igtm pre event golf survey by sports marketing survey - part I
Igtm pre event golf survey by sports marketing survey - part IIgtm pre event golf survey by sports marketing survey - part I
Igtm pre event golf survey by sports marketing survey - part IMS-Co
 
Report Marketing Networking - 24.10.12
Report Marketing Networking - 24.10.12Report Marketing Networking - 24.10.12
Report Marketing Networking - 24.10.12KingBee Media
 
Survey summary 04232010
Survey summary 04232010Survey summary 04232010
Survey summary 04232010guest12ae0e
 
Building Community in the Digial Marketplace - What's a Y to Do?
Building Community in the Digial Marketplace - What's a Y to Do?Building Community in the Digial Marketplace - What's a Y to Do?
Building Community in the Digial Marketplace - What's a Y to Do?Steve Drake
 
MACE Compensation & Benefits Results - Iowa
MACE Compensation & Benefits Results - IowaMACE Compensation & Benefits Results - Iowa
MACE Compensation & Benefits Results - Iowaiowachamberexecs
 
Response summary [ skills perception survey ] - google docs
Response summary   [ skills perception survey ] - google docsResponse summary   [ skills perception survey ] - google docs
Response summary [ skills perception survey ] - google docsSiddharth Kothari
 
Middle School Success
Middle School SuccessMiddle School Success
Middle School SuccessChristin007
 
California higher ed where is comes from and where it goes
California higher ed where is comes from and where it goesCalifornia higher ed where is comes from and where it goes
California higher ed where is comes from and where it goesSally Hamilton
 
Social Media & Mapping Industry
Social Media & Mapping IndustrySocial Media & Mapping Industry
Social Media & Mapping IndustryMani Singh
 

Similaire à Vendor Performance Management survey results nov 7th (20)

Food security in Martadi VDC of Bajura district, FWDR Nepal
Food security in Martadi VDC of Bajura district, FWDR NepalFood security in Martadi VDC of Bajura district, FWDR Nepal
Food security in Martadi VDC of Bajura district, FWDR Nepal
 
Keypad results
Keypad resultsKeypad results
Keypad results
 
Social Business Survey - Summary of Responses
Social Business Survey - Summary of ResponsesSocial Business Survey - Summary of Responses
Social Business Survey - Summary of Responses
 
Antonio Donini - Civ-mil and the future of Humanitarian Action
Antonio Donini - Civ-mil and the future of Humanitarian ActionAntonio Donini - Civ-mil and the future of Humanitarian Action
Antonio Donini - Civ-mil and the future of Humanitarian Action
 
The KPI's of job board Success
The KPI's of job board SuccessThe KPI's of job board Success
The KPI's of job board Success
 
Survey results
Survey resultsSurvey results
Survey results
 
Mobilize your creativity - Eyal Rabinovich.docx
Mobilize your creativity - Eyal Rabinovich.docxMobilize your creativity - Eyal Rabinovich.docx
Mobilize your creativity - Eyal Rabinovich.docx
 
社会化媒体赞助广告研究报告
社会化媒体赞助广告研究报告社会化媒体赞助广告研究报告
社会化媒体赞助广告研究报告
 
Igtm pre event golf survey by sports marketing survey - part I
Igtm pre event golf survey by sports marketing survey - part IIgtm pre event golf survey by sports marketing survey - part I
Igtm pre event golf survey by sports marketing survey - part I
 
Healthcare Marketing Survey 2012
Healthcare Marketing Survey 2012Healthcare Marketing Survey 2012
Healthcare Marketing Survey 2012
 
Report Marketing Networking - 24.10.12
Report Marketing Networking - 24.10.12Report Marketing Networking - 24.10.12
Report Marketing Networking - 24.10.12
 
Survey Summary
Survey Summary Survey Summary
Survey Summary
 
Survey summary 04232010
Survey summary 04232010Survey summary 04232010
Survey summary 04232010
 
Building Community in the Digial Marketplace - What's a Y to Do?
Building Community in the Digial Marketplace - What's a Y to Do?Building Community in the Digial Marketplace - What's a Y to Do?
Building Community in the Digial Marketplace - What's a Y to Do?
 
MACE Compensation & Benefits Results - Iowa
MACE Compensation & Benefits Results - IowaMACE Compensation & Benefits Results - Iowa
MACE Compensation & Benefits Results - Iowa
 
Response summary [ skills perception survey ] - google docs
Response summary   [ skills perception survey ] - google docsResponse summary   [ skills perception survey ] - google docs
Response summary [ skills perception survey ] - google docs
 
Middle School Success
Middle School SuccessMiddle School Success
Middle School Success
 
California higher ed where is comes from and where it goes
California higher ed where is comes from and where it goesCalifornia higher ed where is comes from and where it goes
California higher ed where is comes from and where it goes
 
Tv Industry Report 2012
Tv Industry Report 2012Tv Industry Report 2012
Tv Industry Report 2012
 
Social Media & Mapping Industry
Social Media & Mapping IndustrySocial Media & Mapping Industry
Social Media & Mapping Industry
 

Dernier

Contemporary Economic Issues Facing the Filipino Entrepreneur (1).pptx
Contemporary Economic Issues Facing the Filipino Entrepreneur (1).pptxContemporary Economic Issues Facing the Filipino Entrepreneur (1).pptx
Contemporary Economic Issues Facing the Filipino Entrepreneur (1).pptxMarkAnthonyAurellano
 
Marketplace and Quality Assurance Presentation - Vincent Chirchir
Marketplace and Quality Assurance Presentation - Vincent ChirchirMarketplace and Quality Assurance Presentation - Vincent Chirchir
Marketplace and Quality Assurance Presentation - Vincent Chirchirictsugar
 
Investment in The Coconut Industry by Nancy Cheruiyot
Investment in The Coconut Industry by Nancy CheruiyotInvestment in The Coconut Industry by Nancy Cheruiyot
Investment in The Coconut Industry by Nancy Cheruiyotictsugar
 
Ten Organizational Design Models to align structure and operations to busines...
Ten Organizational Design Models to align structure and operations to busines...Ten Organizational Design Models to align structure and operations to busines...
Ten Organizational Design Models to align structure and operations to busines...Seta Wicaksana
 
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Shivaji Enclave Delhi NCR
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Shivaji Enclave Delhi NCR8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Shivaji Enclave Delhi NCR
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Shivaji Enclave Delhi NCRashishs7044
 
Call Us 📲8800102216📞 Call Girls In DLF City Gurgaon
Call Us 📲8800102216📞 Call Girls In DLF City GurgaonCall Us 📲8800102216📞 Call Girls In DLF City Gurgaon
Call Us 📲8800102216📞 Call Girls In DLF City Gurgaoncallgirls2057
 
Buy gmail accounts.pdf Buy Old Gmail Accounts
Buy gmail accounts.pdf Buy Old Gmail AccountsBuy gmail accounts.pdf Buy Old Gmail Accounts
Buy gmail accounts.pdf Buy Old Gmail AccountsBuy Verified Accounts
 
Traction part 2 - EOS Model JAX Bridges.
Traction part 2 - EOS Model JAX Bridges.Traction part 2 - EOS Model JAX Bridges.
Traction part 2 - EOS Model JAX Bridges.Anamaria Contreras
 
2024 Numerator Consumer Study of Cannabis Usage
2024 Numerator Consumer Study of Cannabis Usage2024 Numerator Consumer Study of Cannabis Usage
2024 Numerator Consumer Study of Cannabis UsageNeil Kimberley
 
India Consumer 2024 Redacted Sample Report
India Consumer 2024 Redacted Sample ReportIndia Consumer 2024 Redacted Sample Report
India Consumer 2024 Redacted Sample ReportMintel Group
 
Cybersecurity Awareness Training Presentation v2024.03
Cybersecurity Awareness Training Presentation v2024.03Cybersecurity Awareness Training Presentation v2024.03
Cybersecurity Awareness Training Presentation v2024.03DallasHaselhorst
 
Market Sizes Sample Report - 2024 Edition
Market Sizes Sample Report - 2024 EditionMarket Sizes Sample Report - 2024 Edition
Market Sizes Sample Report - 2024 EditionMintel Group
 
Innovation Conference 5th March 2024.pdf
Innovation Conference 5th March 2024.pdfInnovation Conference 5th March 2024.pdf
Innovation Conference 5th March 2024.pdfrichard876048
 
Case study on tata clothing brand zudio in detail
Case study on tata clothing brand zudio in detailCase study on tata clothing brand zudio in detail
Case study on tata clothing brand zudio in detailAriel592675
 
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Rohini Delhi NCR
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Rohini Delhi NCR8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Rohini Delhi NCR
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Rohini Delhi NCRashishs7044
 
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Tughlakabad Delhi NCR
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Tughlakabad Delhi NCR8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Tughlakabad Delhi NCR
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Tughlakabad Delhi NCRashishs7044
 
Organizational Structure Running A Successful Business
Organizational Structure Running A Successful BusinessOrganizational Structure Running A Successful Business
Organizational Structure Running A Successful BusinessSeta Wicaksana
 
Pitch Deck Teardown: Geodesic.Life's $500k Pre-seed deck
Pitch Deck Teardown: Geodesic.Life's $500k Pre-seed deckPitch Deck Teardown: Geodesic.Life's $500k Pre-seed deck
Pitch Deck Teardown: Geodesic.Life's $500k Pre-seed deckHajeJanKamps
 

Dernier (20)

Contemporary Economic Issues Facing the Filipino Entrepreneur (1).pptx
Contemporary Economic Issues Facing the Filipino Entrepreneur (1).pptxContemporary Economic Issues Facing the Filipino Entrepreneur (1).pptx
Contemporary Economic Issues Facing the Filipino Entrepreneur (1).pptx
 
Marketplace and Quality Assurance Presentation - Vincent Chirchir
Marketplace and Quality Assurance Presentation - Vincent ChirchirMarketplace and Quality Assurance Presentation - Vincent Chirchir
Marketplace and Quality Assurance Presentation - Vincent Chirchir
 
Investment in The Coconut Industry by Nancy Cheruiyot
Investment in The Coconut Industry by Nancy CheruiyotInvestment in The Coconut Industry by Nancy Cheruiyot
Investment in The Coconut Industry by Nancy Cheruiyot
 
Call Us ➥9319373153▻Call Girls In North Goa
Call Us ➥9319373153▻Call Girls In North GoaCall Us ➥9319373153▻Call Girls In North Goa
Call Us ➥9319373153▻Call Girls In North Goa
 
Ten Organizational Design Models to align structure and operations to busines...
Ten Organizational Design Models to align structure and operations to busines...Ten Organizational Design Models to align structure and operations to busines...
Ten Organizational Design Models to align structure and operations to busines...
 
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Shivaji Enclave Delhi NCR
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Shivaji Enclave Delhi NCR8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Shivaji Enclave Delhi NCR
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Shivaji Enclave Delhi NCR
 
Call Us 📲8800102216📞 Call Girls In DLF City Gurgaon
Call Us 📲8800102216📞 Call Girls In DLF City GurgaonCall Us 📲8800102216📞 Call Girls In DLF City Gurgaon
Call Us 📲8800102216📞 Call Girls In DLF City Gurgaon
 
Buy gmail accounts.pdf Buy Old Gmail Accounts
Buy gmail accounts.pdf Buy Old Gmail AccountsBuy gmail accounts.pdf Buy Old Gmail Accounts
Buy gmail accounts.pdf Buy Old Gmail Accounts
 
Traction part 2 - EOS Model JAX Bridges.
Traction part 2 - EOS Model JAX Bridges.Traction part 2 - EOS Model JAX Bridges.
Traction part 2 - EOS Model JAX Bridges.
 
2024 Numerator Consumer Study of Cannabis Usage
2024 Numerator Consumer Study of Cannabis Usage2024 Numerator Consumer Study of Cannabis Usage
2024 Numerator Consumer Study of Cannabis Usage
 
India Consumer 2024 Redacted Sample Report
India Consumer 2024 Redacted Sample ReportIndia Consumer 2024 Redacted Sample Report
India Consumer 2024 Redacted Sample Report
 
Cybersecurity Awareness Training Presentation v2024.03
Cybersecurity Awareness Training Presentation v2024.03Cybersecurity Awareness Training Presentation v2024.03
Cybersecurity Awareness Training Presentation v2024.03
 
Japan IT Week 2024 Brochure by 47Billion (English)
Japan IT Week 2024 Brochure by 47Billion (English)Japan IT Week 2024 Brochure by 47Billion (English)
Japan IT Week 2024 Brochure by 47Billion (English)
 
Market Sizes Sample Report - 2024 Edition
Market Sizes Sample Report - 2024 EditionMarket Sizes Sample Report - 2024 Edition
Market Sizes Sample Report - 2024 Edition
 
Innovation Conference 5th March 2024.pdf
Innovation Conference 5th March 2024.pdfInnovation Conference 5th March 2024.pdf
Innovation Conference 5th March 2024.pdf
 
Case study on tata clothing brand zudio in detail
Case study on tata clothing brand zudio in detailCase study on tata clothing brand zudio in detail
Case study on tata clothing brand zudio in detail
 
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Rohini Delhi NCR
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Rohini Delhi NCR8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Rohini Delhi NCR
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Rohini Delhi NCR
 
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Tughlakabad Delhi NCR
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Tughlakabad Delhi NCR8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Tughlakabad Delhi NCR
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Tughlakabad Delhi NCR
 
Organizational Structure Running A Successful Business
Organizational Structure Running A Successful BusinessOrganizational Structure Running A Successful Business
Organizational Structure Running A Successful Business
 
Pitch Deck Teardown: Geodesic.Life's $500k Pre-seed deck
Pitch Deck Teardown: Geodesic.Life's $500k Pre-seed deckPitch Deck Teardown: Geodesic.Life's $500k Pre-seed deck
Pitch Deck Teardown: Geodesic.Life's $500k Pre-seed deck
 

Vendor Performance Management survey results nov 7th

  • 1. Graphical Results by Question Turning Graphical Results by Question Session Name: New Session 11-7-2012 3-42 PM Created: 11/12/2012 1:25 PM 12.8% 5.1% 0% 1.) Which image best describes how you feel today… (multiple choice) Responses Happy 32 82.05% 82% Indifferent 5 12.82% Sad 2 5.13% Angry 0 0% Totals 39 100% Happy Indifferent Sad Angry 20.5% 41% 10.3% 2.) How do you compare to MTO - which sector are you 15.4% in? (multiple choice) Responses 0% Municipal 8 20.51% 2.6% 10.3% Academic (University/College) 6 15.38% School Board 0 0% Municipal Academic (University/College) Health Care 4 10.26% School Board Health Care Broader Public Sector 4 10.26% Private Sector 1 2.56% Broader Public Sector Private Sector Federal/Provincial 16 41.03% Federal/Provincial Totals 39 100% 36.8% 2.6% 0% 5.3% 2.6% 23.7% 3.) How many employees work for your organization? 7.9% (multiple choice) Responses 18.4% 1 to 9 0 2.63% 10 to 24 2 5.26% 25 to 99 1 2.63% 100 to 249 3 7.89% 250 to 499 7 18.42% 500 to 999 9 23.68% 1 to 9 10 to 24 25 to 99 100 to 249 1000 to 2499 14 36.84% 2500 + 1 2.63% 250 to 499 500 to 999 1000 to 2499 2500 + Totals 38 100% 17.7% 6.4% 8.1% 1.6% 32.3% 4.) Other than CPPC which Organization(s) do you belong 21% 6.4% to? Pick as many as you would like! (multiple choice) Responses 4.8% OPBA 5 8.06% 0% 1.6% OIPMAC 20 32.26% NIGP 13 20.97% OPBA OIPMAC NIGP OECM 1 1.61% CMC 0 0% OECM CMC HSCN HSCN 3 4.84% Construction Association ISM Other Construction Association 4 6.45% ISM 1 1.61% None Other 11 17.74% None 4 6.45% Totals 62 100% 34.2% 23.7% 5.) How many competitive bids did your group issue in 2011? (multiple choice) Responses 10.5% 29% 1 to 49 9 23.68% 50 to 99 11 28.95% 100 to 149 1 2.63% 150 to 199 4 10.53% Greater than 200 13 34.21% Totals 38 100% 2.6% 1 to 49 50 to 99 100 to 149 150 to 199 Greater than 200 Confidential Gerald Ford: grford@qcsolver.com Page 1 14/11/2012 Arthur Skuja: ASkuja@merx.com
  • 2. Graphical Results by Question 27% 24.3% 0% 6.) On average how many vendor performance evaluations do you do per year? (multiple choice) Responses 37.8% None 9 24.32% 1 to 10 14 37.84% 10.8% 11 to 25 4 10.81% 26 to 49 0 0% 50+ 10 27.03% Totals 37 100% None 1 to 10 11 to 25 26 to 49 50+ 8.2% 17.3% 17.3% 7.) Which tools or methods do you use? Pick as many as 16.3% you would like! (multiple choice) Responses 17.3% 8.2% 15.3% Checklists 17 17.35% Forms 16 16.33% Templates 15 15.31% User Guides & Manuals 8 8.16% Progress meetings 17 17.35% Checklists Forms Performance documentation 17 17.35% 3rd Party verification 8 8.16% Templates User Guides & Manuals Totals 98 100% Progress meetings Performance documentation 3rd Party verification 9.2% 8.2% 10.2% 1% 9.2% 8.) What triggers an evaluation? (multiple choice) Responses Periodic 10 10.20% Budget Threshold 9 9.18% 19.4% 19.4% Contract performance 19 19.39% Project profile 6 6.12% New vendor 11.2% 6.1% 6.1% 6 6.12% Project complexity 11 11.22% Periodic Budget Threshold Contract performance Client Dissatisfaction 19 19.39% Repeat vendors 1 1.02% Project profile New vendor Project complexity Length of Engagement 9 9.18% Client Dissatisfaction Repeat vendors Length of Engagement Every Project 8 8.16% Totals 98 100% Every Project 9.) On a scale from 1 to 5, what is the average score you 3.1% 6.2% 9.4% give to your contractors when you do evaluations? (multiple choice) Responses 40.6% Poor 2 6.25% 40.6% Acceptable 3 9.38% Standard 13 40.62% Good 13 40.62% Excellent 1 3.12% Totals 32 100% Poor Acceptable Standard Good Excellent 10.) What is important for an effective engagement? 18.1% 5.7% 23% Responses 5.6% (priority ranking) 12.2% 5.1% Effective communication throughout engagement 200 22.96% 10.6% 19.8% Quality of resources 49 5.63% Availability of resources to carry out contra... 44 5.05% Effective communication throughout engagement Quality of the final deliverables 172 19.75% Providing value added services 92 10.56% Quality of resources Maintaining timelines/deadlines 106 12.17% Availability of resources to carry out contra... Budget/cost control 158 18.14% Having a vendor contact for dispute resolutio... 50 5.74% Quality of the final deliverables Totals 871 100% Providing value added services Maintaining timelines/deadlines Confidential Gerald Ford: grford@qcsolver.com Page 2 14/11/2012 Arthur Skuja: ASkuja@merx.com
  • 3. Graphical Results by Question 11.) What are your greatest challenges to having an 12.8% 31.9% effective VPM! (multiple choice) Responses 21.3% Not enough time 15 31.91% End user input difficult to get 12 25.53% 0% Poor systems 4 8.51% 8.5% Not required 0 0% 25.5% Missing linkage between contract and performa... 10 21.28% Not enough time Comparative Consistency 6 12.77% Totals 47 100% End user input difficult to get Poor systems Not required Missing linkage between contract and performa... Comparative Consistency 12.) Is the use of bonding a viable alternative to vendor performance management? (multiple choice) Responses Yes 9 25% No 11 30.56% 25% 44.4% Depends 16 44.44% Totals 36 100% 30.6% Yes No Depends 13.) Do you share performance results with vendors? (multiple choice) Responses Yes 25 80.65% No 6 19.35% Totals 31 100% 19.4% 80.6% Yes No 14.) Do you tie VPM data to proposal evaluations and vendor selection? (multiple choice) Responses Proposals 2 6.90% 6.9% Evaluations 7 24.14% 41.4% 24.1% Both 8 27.59% Neither 12 41.38% Totals 29 100% 27.6% Proposals Evaluations Both Neither Confidential Gerald Ford: grford@qcsolver.com Page 3 14/11/2012 Arthur Skuja: ASkuja@merx.com
  • 4. Graphical Results by Question 15.) Do you tie vendor qualification to specific procurements or a general work or product category? (multiple choice) Responses 10% Specific 21 70% 20% General 6 20% Product Category 3 10% 70% Totals 30 100% Specific General Product Category 16.) And how do you feel now? (multiple choice) Responses Happy 18 51.43% Indifferent 6 17.14% 14.3% Sad 6 17.14% 17.1% 51.4% Angry 5 14.29% Totals 35 100% 17.1% Happy Indifferent Sad Angry Confidential Gerald Ford: grford@qcsolver.com Page 4 14/11/2012 Arthur Skuja: ASkuja@merx.com