SlideShare une entreprise Scribd logo
1  sur  5
Télécharger pour lire hors ligne
.....................................................................
(Original Signature of Member)
114TH CONGRESS
2D SESSION
H. CON. RES. l
Expressing the sense of Congress that child safety is the first priority of
custody and visitation adjudications, and that state courts should improve
adjudications of custody where family violence is alleged.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
Mr. POE of Texas submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was
referred to the Committee on lllllllllllllll
CONCURRENT RESOLUTION
Expressing the sense of Congress that child safety is the
first priority of custody and visitation adjudications, and
that state courts should improve adjudications of custody
where family violence is alleged.
Whereas approximately 15 million children are exposed each
year to domestic violence and/or child abuse, which are
often linked;
Whereas child sexual abuse is significantly under-docu-
mented, and under-addressed in the legal system;
Whereas child abuse is a major public health issue in the
United States, with total lifetime estimated financial
costs associated with just one year of confirmed cases of
VerDate 0ct 09 2002 12:51 Sep 09, 2016 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6300 C:USERSHRBRAZ~1APPDATAROAMINGSOFTQUADXMETAL7.0GENCPOE_122.XM
September 9, 2016 (12:51 p.m.)
F:M14POEPOE_122.XML
f:VHLC090916090916.136.xml (638836|2)
2
child maltreatment (including physical abuse, sexual
abuse, psychological abuse and neglect) amounting to ap-
proximately $124 billion;
Whereas according to the Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention, federally launched, funded and tracked longi-
tudinal research into ‘‘adverse childhood experiences’’
(the ACEs study) has shown that ‘‘children who experi-
ence abuse and neglect are also at increased risk for ad-
verse health effects and certain chronic diseases as
adults, including heart disease, cancer, chronic lung dis-
ease, liver disease, obesity, high blood pressure, high cho-
lesterol, and high levels of C-reactive protein’’;
Whereas research confirms that allegations of domestic vio-
lence, child abuse, and child sexual abuse are often dis-
counted when raised in child custody litigation;
Whereas research shows that abusive parents are often grant-
ed custody or unprotected visitation by courts, placing
children at ongoing risk;
Whereas research confirms that a child’s risk of abuse in-
creases after a perpetrator of domestic violence separates
from a domestic partner, even if the perpetrator has not
previously abused the child;
Whereas researchers have documented 175 instances of chil-
dren killed in a 2-year period by parents involved in di-
vorce, separation, custody, visitation, or child support
proceedings, and hundreds more over a period of approxi-
mately seven years, often after access was provided by
custody courts over the objections of a protective parent;
Whereas scientifically unsound theories such as parental
alienation syndrome, enmeshment, and others are fre-
VerDate 0ct 09 2002 12:51 Sep 09, 2016 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6300 C:USERSHRBRAZ~1APPDATAROAMINGSOFTQUADXMETAL7.0GENCPOE_122.XM
September 9, 2016 (12:51 p.m.)
F:M14POEPOE_122.XML
f:VHLC090916090916.136.xml (638836|2)
3
quently applied to reject women’s and children’s reports
of abuse;
Whereas in cases involving allegations of family violence
courts should rely on the assistance of third party profes-
sionals only when they possess the proper experience or
expertise for assessing family violence and trauma, and
apply scientifically sound theories;
Whereas most states lack standards defining required exper-
tise and experience for court-affiliated or appointed fee-
paid professionals in custody litigation or the required
contents of custody-related expert reports;
Whereas custody litigation involving abuse allegations is
sometimes prohibitively expensive, resulting in parental
bankruptcy, as a result of court-mandated payments to
appointed fee-paid professionals, on top of attorneys’
fees; and
Whereas the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights
found that the United States is failing in its legal obliga-
tion to protect women and children from domestic vio-
lence: Now, therefore, be it
Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate1
concurring), That it is the sense of Congress that—2
(1) child safety is the first priority of custody3
and visitation adjudications, and courts should re-4
solve safety risks and claims of family violence first,5
as a fundamental consideration, before assessing6
other best interest factors;7
VerDate 0ct 09 2002 12:51 Sep 09, 2016 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 C:USERSHRBRAZ~1APPDATAROAMINGSOFTQUADXMETAL7.0GENCPOE_122.XM
September 9, 2016 (12:51 p.m.)
F:M14POEPOE_122.XML
f:VHLC090916090916.136.xml (638836|2)
4
(2) quasi-scientific evidence should be admitted1
by courts only when it meets admissibility standards2
for scientific evidence;3
(3) evidence from court-affiliated or appointed4
fee-paid professionals regarding adult or child abuse5
allegations in custody cases should be considered6
only when the professional possesses documented ex-7
pertise and experience in the relevant types of abuse,8
trauma, and the behaviors of victims and perpetra-9
tors;10
(4) States should define required standards of11
expertise and experience for appointed fee-paid pro-12
fessionals who provide evidence to the court on13
abuse, trauma and behaviors of victims and per-14
petrators, should specify requirements for the con-15
tents of such professional reports, and should re-16
quire courts to find that any appointed professionals17
meet those standards;18
(5) States should consider models under which19
court-appointed professionals are paid directly by20
the courts, with potential reimbursement by the par-21
ties after due consideration of the parties’ financial22
circumstances; and23
(6) Congress should schedule hearings on fam-24
ily courts’ practices with regard to the objective,25
VerDate 0ct 09 2002 12:51 Sep 09, 2016 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 C:USERSHRBRAZ~1APPDATAROAMINGSOFTQUADXMETAL7.0GENCPOE_122.XM
September 9, 2016 (12:51 p.m.)
F:M14POEPOE_122.XML
f:VHLC090916090916.136.xml (638836|2)
5
fair, and adjudication of children’s safety and civil1
rights.2
VerDate 0ct 09 2002 12:51 Sep 09, 2016 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 C:USERSHRBRAZ~1APPDATAROAMINGSOFTQUADXMETAL7.0GENCPOE_122.XM
September 9, 2016 (12:51 p.m.)
F:M14POEPOE_122.XML
f:VHLC090916090916.136.xml (638836|2)

Contenu connexe

Tendances

Instructions For Parents Divorcing Without Benefit Of Legal Representation Pro
Instructions For Parents Divorcing Without Benefit Of Legal Representation ProInstructions For Parents Divorcing Without Benefit Of Legal Representation Pro
Instructions For Parents Divorcing Without Benefit Of Legal Representation Pro
legalcounsel
 
The Basics of Incapacity and Guardianship
The Basics of Incapacity and GuardianshipThe Basics of Incapacity and Guardianship
The Basics of Incapacity and Guardianship
wsunter
 
1 Initial Appearance Checklist
1 Initial Appearance Checklist1 Initial Appearance Checklist
1 Initial Appearance Checklist
Cayla Thomas
 
Off-Bench Commentaries of Federal Judges A Case Study
Off-Bench Commentaries of Federal Judges A Case StudyOff-Bench Commentaries of Federal Judges A Case Study
Off-Bench Commentaries of Federal Judges A Case Study
Philip Stevens
 
SAVE-VAWA-Restraining-Orders
SAVE-VAWA-Restraining-OrdersSAVE-VAWA-Restraining-Orders
SAVE-VAWA-Restraining-Orders
L. Gabriel Womack
 

Tendances (20)

Expungement Presentation – Gang Intervention Conference
Expungement Presentation – Gang Intervention ConferenceExpungement Presentation – Gang Intervention Conference
Expungement Presentation – Gang Intervention Conference
 
Selecting Your Jury For A Criminal Jury Trial in New York
Selecting Your Jury For A Criminal Jury Trial in New YorkSelecting Your Jury For A Criminal Jury Trial in New York
Selecting Your Jury For A Criminal Jury Trial in New York
 
Options after an Appeals Council Denial
Options after an Appeals Council DenialOptions after an Appeals Council Denial
Options after an Appeals Council Denial
 
Chapter 12
Chapter 12Chapter 12
Chapter 12
 
Instructions For Parents Divorcing Without Benefit Of Legal Representation Pro
Instructions For Parents Divorcing Without Benefit Of Legal Representation ProInstructions For Parents Divorcing Without Benefit Of Legal Representation Pro
Instructions For Parents Divorcing Without Benefit Of Legal Representation Pro
 
SWK 597 Week 6. criminal justice and sexual offenses
SWK 597 Week 6. criminal justice and sexual offensesSWK 597 Week 6. criminal justice and sexual offenses
SWK 597 Week 6. criminal justice and sexual offenses
 
Violation of a Protective Order Defense Lawyer Utah
Violation of a Protective Order Defense Lawyer UtahViolation of a Protective Order Defense Lawyer Utah
Violation of a Protective Order Defense Lawyer Utah
 
Chapter 11
Chapter 11Chapter 11
Chapter 11
 
The Basics of Incapacity and Guardianship
The Basics of Incapacity and GuardianshipThe Basics of Incapacity and Guardianship
The Basics of Incapacity and Guardianship
 
1 Initial Appearance Checklist
1 Initial Appearance Checklist1 Initial Appearance Checklist
1 Initial Appearance Checklist
 
PrisonReport040212
PrisonReport040212PrisonReport040212
PrisonReport040212
 
Off-Bench Commentaries of Federal Judges A Case Study
Off-Bench Commentaries of Federal Judges A Case StudyOff-Bench Commentaries of Federal Judges A Case Study
Off-Bench Commentaries of Federal Judges A Case Study
 
Chapter 15
Chapter 15Chapter 15
Chapter 15
 
Stages of a Car Crash Lawsuit
Stages of a Car Crash LawsuitStages of a Car Crash Lawsuit
Stages of a Car Crash Lawsuit
 
Domestic Violence In Asian Communities
Domestic Violence In Asian CommunitiesDomestic Violence In Asian Communities
Domestic Violence In Asian Communities
 
SAVE-VAWA-Restraining-Orders
SAVE-VAWA-Restraining-OrdersSAVE-VAWA-Restraining-Orders
SAVE-VAWA-Restraining-Orders
 
BOLE and Barratry
BOLE and BarratryBOLE and Barratry
BOLE and Barratry
 
American Bar Association standards for Guardians Ad Litem
American Bar Association standards for Guardians Ad LitemAmerican Bar Association standards for Guardians Ad Litem
American Bar Association standards for Guardians Ad Litem
 
Ethical Rules for Litigating in the Court of Public Opinion
Ethical Rules for Litigating in the Court of Public OpinionEthical Rules for Litigating in the Court of Public Opinion
Ethical Rules for Litigating in the Court of Public Opinion
 
Brit luchotlawyers article
Brit luchotlawyers articleBrit luchotlawyers article
Brit luchotlawyers article
 

En vedette (20)

Law of tort 05 09-16
Law of tort 05 09-16Law of tort 05 09-16
Law of tort 05 09-16
 
Dunia quintero f_cris[1]
Dunia quintero f_cris[1]Dunia quintero f_cris[1]
Dunia quintero f_cris[1]
 
97 2003.
97 2003.97 2003.
97 2003.
 
La musica
La musicaLa musica
La musica
 
El universo-holografico
El universo-holograficoEl universo-holografico
El universo-holografico
 
Practica5
Practica5Practica5
Practica5
 
Instalacion y configuracion del s.o.
Instalacion y configuracion del s.o.Instalacion y configuracion del s.o.
Instalacion y configuracion del s.o.
 
Informe 1111
Informe 1111Informe 1111
Informe 1111
 
Brian Fitts-Resume (2)
Brian Fitts-Resume (2)Brian Fitts-Resume (2)
Brian Fitts-Resume (2)
 
Practica5
Practica5Practica5
Practica5
 
Heraldos del evangelio
Heraldos del evangelioHeraldos del evangelio
Heraldos del evangelio
 
Gato
GatoGato
Gato
 
Automatizacion leslie
Automatizacion leslieAutomatizacion leslie
Automatizacion leslie
 
LOS ANIMALES I
LOS ANIMALES ILOS ANIMALES I
LOS ANIMALES I
 
Laroboticaunavisionpedagogicaparaunaecnologiaactual 150713030642-lva1-app6891
Laroboticaunavisionpedagogicaparaunaecnologiaactual 150713030642-lva1-app6891Laroboticaunavisionpedagogicaparaunaecnologiaactual 150713030642-lva1-app6891
Laroboticaunavisionpedagogicaparaunaecnologiaactual 150713030642-lva1-app6891
 
Narcotráfico español ii
Narcotráfico   español iiNarcotráfico   español ii
Narcotráfico español ii
 
Մխիթար Սեբաստացի(2 մաս)
Մխիթար Սեբաստացի(2 մաս)Մխիթար Սեբաստացի(2 մաս)
Մխիթար Սեբաստացի(2 մաս)
 
Capitulo 7 bases de datos
Capitulo 7 bases de datosCapitulo 7 bases de datos
Capitulo 7 bases de datos
 
Fotografia
Fotografia Fotografia
Fotografia
 
Equipo 1
Equipo 1Equipo 1
Equipo 1
 

Similaire à H. Con. Res. 150 Introduced 9.9.2016

Navigating the Maze - The ALRC's/NSWLRC's Family Violence Inquiry
Navigating the Maze - The ALRC's/NSWLRC's Family Violence Inquiry  Navigating the Maze - The ALRC's/NSWLRC's Family Violence Inquiry
Navigating the Maze - The ALRC's/NSWLRC's Family Violence Inquiry
ALRC
 
Improving Burdens of Proof and Standards in D.C.'s Child Welfare Proceedings
Improving Burdens of Proof and Standards in D.C.'s Child Welfare ProceedingsImproving Burdens of Proof and Standards in D.C.'s Child Welfare Proceedings
Improving Burdens of Proof and Standards in D.C.'s Child Welfare Proceedings
Jera Oliver
 
Between the time that the police make an arrestand a case is event.docx
Between the time that the police make an arrestand a case is event.docxBetween the time that the police make an arrestand a case is event.docx
Between the time that the police make an arrestand a case is event.docx
jasoninnes20
 
Between the time that the police make an arrestand a case is event.docx
Between the time that the police make an arrestand a case is event.docxBetween the time that the police make an arrestand a case is event.docx
Between the time that the police make an arrestand a case is event.docx
richardnorman90310
 
Np v state_of_georgia_usa_statement_of_interest
Np v state_of_georgia_usa_statement_of_interestNp v state_of_georgia_usa_statement_of_interest
Np v state_of_georgia_usa_statement_of_interest
screaminc
 
Learning Unit 5: Prosecutor Response to D.V. -CRJ 461
Learning Unit 5: Prosecutor Response to D.V. -CRJ 461Learning Unit 5: Prosecutor Response to D.V. -CRJ 461
Learning Unit 5: Prosecutor Response to D.V. -CRJ 461
Bonnie Black
 
7 Juvenile Justice ProceduresChapter Learning Objectives.docx
7 Juvenile Justice ProceduresChapter Learning Objectives.docx7 Juvenile Justice ProceduresChapter Learning Objectives.docx
7 Juvenile Justice ProceduresChapter Learning Objectives.docx
sleeperharwell
 
Colorado V. Connelly479 U.S 157 (1986)Facts· Co.docx
Colorado V. Connelly479 U.S 157 (1986)Facts· Co.docxColorado V. Connelly479 U.S 157 (1986)Facts· Co.docx
Colorado V. Connelly479 U.S 157 (1986)Facts· Co.docx
mccormicknadine86
 
Inquiry into pediatric forensic pathology in ontario goudge inquiry
Inquiry into pediatric forensic pathology in ontario   goudge inquiryInquiry into pediatric forensic pathology in ontario   goudge inquiry
Inquiry into pediatric forensic pathology in ontario goudge inquiry
Alison Stevens
 
Inquiry Into Pediatric Forensic Pathology In Ontario Goudge Inquiry
Inquiry Into Pediatric Forensic Pathology In Ontario   Goudge InquiryInquiry Into Pediatric Forensic Pathology In Ontario   Goudge Inquiry
Inquiry Into Pediatric Forensic Pathology In Ontario Goudge Inquiry
alisonegypt
 
Chiefs Counsel Chiefs Counsel Should Police Officers Wh.docx
Chiefs Counsel Chiefs Counsel Should Police Officers Wh.docxChiefs Counsel Chiefs Counsel Should Police Officers Wh.docx
Chiefs Counsel Chiefs Counsel Should Police Officers Wh.docx
mccormicknadine86
 

Similaire à H. Con. Res. 150 Introduced 9.9.2016 (20)

Navigating the Maze - The ALRC's/NSWLRC's Family Violence Inquiry
Navigating the Maze - The ALRC's/NSWLRC's Family Violence Inquiry  Navigating the Maze - The ALRC's/NSWLRC's Family Violence Inquiry
Navigating the Maze - The ALRC's/NSWLRC's Family Violence Inquiry
 
Best Practices letter5
Best Practices letter5Best Practices letter5
Best Practices letter5
 
Improving Burdens of Proof and Standards in D.C.'s Child Welfare Proceedings
Improving Burdens of Proof and Standards in D.C.'s Child Welfare ProceedingsImproving Burdens of Proof and Standards in D.C.'s Child Welfare Proceedings
Improving Burdens of Proof and Standards in D.C.'s Child Welfare Proceedings
 
Between the time that the police make an arrestand a case is event.docx
Between the time that the police make an arrestand a case is event.docxBetween the time that the police make an arrestand a case is event.docx
Between the time that the police make an arrestand a case is event.docx
 
Between the time that the police make an arrestand a case is event.docx
Between the time that the police make an arrestand a case is event.docxBetween the time that the police make an arrestand a case is event.docx
Between the time that the police make an arrestand a case is event.docx
 
The Impact of Domestic Violence on Child Custody Cases.pptx
The Impact of Domestic Violence on Child Custody Cases.pptxThe Impact of Domestic Violence on Child Custody Cases.pptx
The Impact of Domestic Violence on Child Custody Cases.pptx
 
Fpr pd12 j
Fpr pd12 jFpr pd12 j
Fpr pd12 j
 
Np v state_of_georgia_usa_statement_of_interest
Np v state_of_georgia_usa_statement_of_interestNp v state_of_georgia_usa_statement_of_interest
Np v state_of_georgia_usa_statement_of_interest
 
Learning Unit 5: Prosecutor Response to D.V. -CRJ 461
Learning Unit 5: Prosecutor Response to D.V. -CRJ 461Learning Unit 5: Prosecutor Response to D.V. -CRJ 461
Learning Unit 5: Prosecutor Response to D.V. -CRJ 461
 
7 Juvenile Justice ProceduresChapter Learning Objectives.docx
7 Juvenile Justice ProceduresChapter Learning Objectives.docx7 Juvenile Justice ProceduresChapter Learning Objectives.docx
7 Juvenile Justice ProceduresChapter Learning Objectives.docx
 
Chapter 4 - Updated
Chapter 4 - UpdatedChapter 4 - Updated
Chapter 4 - Updated
 
Colorado V. Connelly479 U.S 157 (1986)Facts· Co.docx
Colorado V. Connelly479 U.S 157 (1986)Facts· Co.docxColorado V. Connelly479 U.S 157 (1986)Facts· Co.docx
Colorado V. Connelly479 U.S 157 (1986)Facts· Co.docx
 
DHS's Proposed Order
DHS's Proposed Order DHS's Proposed Order
DHS's Proposed Order
 
Inquiry into pediatric forensic pathology in ontario goudge inquiry
Inquiry into pediatric forensic pathology in ontario   goudge inquiryInquiry into pediatric forensic pathology in ontario   goudge inquiry
Inquiry into pediatric forensic pathology in ontario goudge inquiry
 
Inquiry Into Pediatric Forensic Pathology In Ontario Goudge Inquiry
Inquiry Into Pediatric Forensic Pathology In Ontario   Goudge InquiryInquiry Into Pediatric Forensic Pathology In Ontario   Goudge Inquiry
Inquiry Into Pediatric Forensic Pathology In Ontario Goudge Inquiry
 
Legal remedies for victims of Sexual Exploitation and Sexual Assault in Texas
Legal remedies for victims of Sexual Exploitation and Sexual Assault in TexasLegal remedies for victims of Sexual Exploitation and Sexual Assault in Texas
Legal remedies for victims of Sexual Exploitation and Sexual Assault in Texas
 
Atlanta Powerpoint.mlp.edit
Atlanta Powerpoint.mlp.editAtlanta Powerpoint.mlp.edit
Atlanta Powerpoint.mlp.edit
 
2Page_Summary_v2
2Page_Summary_v22Page_Summary_v2
2Page_Summary_v2
 
9th Circuit Appeal Court Flores Decision.
9th Circuit Appeal Court Flores Decision. 9th Circuit Appeal Court Flores Decision.
9th Circuit Appeal Court Flores Decision.
 
Chiefs Counsel Chiefs Counsel Should Police Officers Wh.docx
Chiefs Counsel Chiefs Counsel Should Police Officers Wh.docxChiefs Counsel Chiefs Counsel Should Police Officers Wh.docx
Chiefs Counsel Chiefs Counsel Should Police Officers Wh.docx
 

H. Con. Res. 150 Introduced 9.9.2016

  • 1. ..................................................................... (Original Signature of Member) 114TH CONGRESS 2D SESSION H. CON. RES. l Expressing the sense of Congress that child safety is the first priority of custody and visitation adjudications, and that state courts should improve adjudications of custody where family violence is alleged. IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES Mr. POE of Texas submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on lllllllllllllll CONCURRENT RESOLUTION Expressing the sense of Congress that child safety is the first priority of custody and visitation adjudications, and that state courts should improve adjudications of custody where family violence is alleged. Whereas approximately 15 million children are exposed each year to domestic violence and/or child abuse, which are often linked; Whereas child sexual abuse is significantly under-docu- mented, and under-addressed in the legal system; Whereas child abuse is a major public health issue in the United States, with total lifetime estimated financial costs associated with just one year of confirmed cases of VerDate 0ct 09 2002 12:51 Sep 09, 2016 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6300 C:USERSHRBRAZ~1APPDATAROAMINGSOFTQUADXMETAL7.0GENCPOE_122.XM September 9, 2016 (12:51 p.m.) F:M14POEPOE_122.XML f:VHLC090916090916.136.xml (638836|2)
  • 2. 2 child maltreatment (including physical abuse, sexual abuse, psychological abuse and neglect) amounting to ap- proximately $124 billion; Whereas according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, federally launched, funded and tracked longi- tudinal research into ‘‘adverse childhood experiences’’ (the ACEs study) has shown that ‘‘children who experi- ence abuse and neglect are also at increased risk for ad- verse health effects and certain chronic diseases as adults, including heart disease, cancer, chronic lung dis- ease, liver disease, obesity, high blood pressure, high cho- lesterol, and high levels of C-reactive protein’’; Whereas research confirms that allegations of domestic vio- lence, child abuse, and child sexual abuse are often dis- counted when raised in child custody litigation; Whereas research shows that abusive parents are often grant- ed custody or unprotected visitation by courts, placing children at ongoing risk; Whereas research confirms that a child’s risk of abuse in- creases after a perpetrator of domestic violence separates from a domestic partner, even if the perpetrator has not previously abused the child; Whereas researchers have documented 175 instances of chil- dren killed in a 2-year period by parents involved in di- vorce, separation, custody, visitation, or child support proceedings, and hundreds more over a period of approxi- mately seven years, often after access was provided by custody courts over the objections of a protective parent; Whereas scientifically unsound theories such as parental alienation syndrome, enmeshment, and others are fre- VerDate 0ct 09 2002 12:51 Sep 09, 2016 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6300 C:USERSHRBRAZ~1APPDATAROAMINGSOFTQUADXMETAL7.0GENCPOE_122.XM September 9, 2016 (12:51 p.m.) F:M14POEPOE_122.XML f:VHLC090916090916.136.xml (638836|2)
  • 3. 3 quently applied to reject women’s and children’s reports of abuse; Whereas in cases involving allegations of family violence courts should rely on the assistance of third party profes- sionals only when they possess the proper experience or expertise for assessing family violence and trauma, and apply scientifically sound theories; Whereas most states lack standards defining required exper- tise and experience for court-affiliated or appointed fee- paid professionals in custody litigation or the required contents of custody-related expert reports; Whereas custody litigation involving abuse allegations is sometimes prohibitively expensive, resulting in parental bankruptcy, as a result of court-mandated payments to appointed fee-paid professionals, on top of attorneys’ fees; and Whereas the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights found that the United States is failing in its legal obliga- tion to protect women and children from domestic vio- lence: Now, therefore, be it Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate1 concurring), That it is the sense of Congress that—2 (1) child safety is the first priority of custody3 and visitation adjudications, and courts should re-4 solve safety risks and claims of family violence first,5 as a fundamental consideration, before assessing6 other best interest factors;7 VerDate 0ct 09 2002 12:51 Sep 09, 2016 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 C:USERSHRBRAZ~1APPDATAROAMINGSOFTQUADXMETAL7.0GENCPOE_122.XM September 9, 2016 (12:51 p.m.) F:M14POEPOE_122.XML f:VHLC090916090916.136.xml (638836|2)
  • 4. 4 (2) quasi-scientific evidence should be admitted1 by courts only when it meets admissibility standards2 for scientific evidence;3 (3) evidence from court-affiliated or appointed4 fee-paid professionals regarding adult or child abuse5 allegations in custody cases should be considered6 only when the professional possesses documented ex-7 pertise and experience in the relevant types of abuse,8 trauma, and the behaviors of victims and perpetra-9 tors;10 (4) States should define required standards of11 expertise and experience for appointed fee-paid pro-12 fessionals who provide evidence to the court on13 abuse, trauma and behaviors of victims and per-14 petrators, should specify requirements for the con-15 tents of such professional reports, and should re-16 quire courts to find that any appointed professionals17 meet those standards;18 (5) States should consider models under which19 court-appointed professionals are paid directly by20 the courts, with potential reimbursement by the par-21 ties after due consideration of the parties’ financial22 circumstances; and23 (6) Congress should schedule hearings on fam-24 ily courts’ practices with regard to the objective,25 VerDate 0ct 09 2002 12:51 Sep 09, 2016 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 C:USERSHRBRAZ~1APPDATAROAMINGSOFTQUADXMETAL7.0GENCPOE_122.XM September 9, 2016 (12:51 p.m.) F:M14POEPOE_122.XML f:VHLC090916090916.136.xml (638836|2)
  • 5. 5 fair, and adjudication of children’s safety and civil1 rights.2 VerDate 0ct 09 2002 12:51 Sep 09, 2016 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 C:USERSHRBRAZ~1APPDATAROAMINGSOFTQUADXMETAL7.0GENCPOE_122.XM September 9, 2016 (12:51 p.m.) F:M14POEPOE_122.XML f:VHLC090916090916.136.xml (638836|2)