SlideShare une entreprise Scribd logo
1  sur  15
Télécharger pour lire hors ligne
BASIS OF STRUCTURAL DESIGN
(EN1990:2002)
Ultimate limit state verification
(EN1990,cl.6.4.1(1)P)
The following ultimate limit states shall be verified as relevant:
EQU: Loss of equilibrium of the structure, (considering for sliding, overturning or uplift)
STR: Internal failure or excessive deformation of the structure of structural member (Design of structural for
strength of members and frames),
GEO: Failure due to excessive deformation of the ground (Design of structural members such as footing,
piles, basement walls, etc.),
FAT: Fatigue failure of the structure or structural member.
Design working life
(CYS NA EN1990,Table 2.1)
Design working life
category
Indicative design
working life (years)
Examples
1 10 Temporary structures (1)
2 10 – 25 Replaceable structural parts, e.g. gantry girders,
bearings
3 15 – 30 Agricultural and similar structures
4 50 Building structures and other common structures
5 100 Monumental building structures, bridges, and other
civil engineering structures
(1) Structures or parts of structures that can be dismantled with a view to being re-used should
not be considered as temporary.
In the case of replaceable structural parts the design life for the structural determination of loads should be
the design life of the structure.
Design Working life
Ultimate Limit State (ULS)
Ultimate Limit State Concern
(EN1990,cl.3.3(1)P)
 Safety of people,
 Safety of the structure
 Protection of the contents
Design situations
(EN1990,cl.3.2(2)P)
Persistent design situation: Normal use condition
Transient design situation: Temporary condition, e.g. during execution or repair
Accidental design situation: Exceptional condition, e.g. fire, explosion, impact.
Seismic design situation: Structure subject to seismic events.
Ultimate Limit State (ULS)
COMBINATION OF ACTIONS FOR PERSISTENT/TRANSIENT DESIGN SITUATION
(EN1990,cl.6.4.3.2)
Persistent and transient design situation – EQU Equation 6.10 (Set A)
6.10 Ed=ΣγG Gk +γQ Qk1 + γQ ψ0,2 Qk2
Action
Favourable
γ
Unfavourable
γ
Permanent (dead,
earth), γG
0.9 1.1
Variable (imposed,
wind), γQ
0 1.5
Note: Single source is not applicable for EQU design situation. Different γ factors can be used in favourable and unfavourable
areas.
Persistent and transient design situation – STR/GEO Equation 6.10, 6.10a & 6.10b (Set B)
6.10
6.10a
6.10b
Ed=ΣγG Gk +γQ Qk1 + γQ ψ0,2 Qk2
Ed=ΣξγG Gk +γQ ψ0,1 Qk1 + γQ ψ0,2 Qk2
Ed=ΣγG Gk +γQ Qk1 + γQ ψ0,2 Qk2
Action
Favourable
γ
Unfavourable
γ
Permanent (dead,
earth), γG
1.0 1.35
Variable (imposed,
wind), γQ
0 1.5
Note: Single source is applicable for STR/GEO design situation.
Persistent and transient design situation – GEO Equation 6.10 (Set C)
6.10 Ed=ΣγG Gk +γQ Qk1 + γQ ψ0,2 Qk2
Action
Favourable
γ
Unfavourable
γ
Permanent (dead,
earth), γG
1.0 1.0
Variable (imposed,
wind), γQ
0 1.3
Note: Single source is applicable for STR/GEO design situation.
Important notes
(EN1990,cl.3.2(2)P)
 Approach 2 (CYS NA EN1990,Table.A1.2(B)) should be used for the
design of the structural members of substructure (i.e. footings, piles,
basement walls, etc.) (CYS NA EN1990,cl. 2.2.3.4).
 Actions that cannot exist simultaneously due to physical of functional
reasons should not be considered together in combination.
 The use of expression 6.10a and 6.10b lead to a more economic
design in most circumstances.

Summary table of partial, combination and reduction factors for the STR and GEO ultimate limit states for
buildings
Expression
Unfavourable Permanent action Unfavourable Variable actions
Self-weight Imposed floor loads Wind loads Snow loads
6.10
γG=1.35 γQ,1 =1.5 γQ,iψ0,i =1.5x05=0.75 γQ,iψ0,i =1.5x05=0.75
γG=1.35 γQ,iψ0,i =1.5x07=1.05 γQ,1 =1.5 γQ,iψ0,i =1.5x05=0.75
γG=1.35 γQ,iψ0,i =1.5x07=1.05 γQ,iψ0,i =1.5x05=0.75 γQ,i =1.5
Less favourable equations 6.10a & 6.10b
6.10a
γG=1.35 γQ,iψ0,i =1.5x07=1.05 γQ,iψ0,i =1.5x05=0.75 γQ,iψ0,i =1.5x05=0.75
γG=1.35 γQ,iψ0,i =1.5x07=1.05 γQ,iψ0,i =1.5x05=0.75 γQ,iψ0,i =1.5x05=0.75
γG=1.35 γQ,iψ0,i =1.5x07=1.05 γQ,iψ0,i =1.5x05=0.75 γQ,iψ0,i =1.5x05=0.75
6.10b
ξγG=0.85*1.35 γQ,1 =1.5 γQ,iψ0,i =1.5x05=0.75 γQ,iψ0,i =1.5x05=0.75
ξγG=0.85*1.35 γQ,iψ0,i =1.5x07=1.05 γQ,1 =1.5 γQ,iψ0,i =1.5x05=0.75
ξγG=0.85*1.35 γQ,iψ0,i =1.5x07=1.05 γQ,iψ0,i =1.5x05=0.75 γQ,i =1.5
Note: Shaded boxes indicate the ‘leading variable action’,
Combination (sensitivity) factor, ψ
(CYS NA EN1990:2002, Table A1.1)
Category Specific Use
ψο ψ1 ψ2
A Domestic and residential 0.7 0.5 0.3
B Office 0.7 0.5 0.3
C Areas for Congregation 0.7 0.7 0.6
D Shopping 0.7 0.7 0.6
E Storage 1.0 0.9 0.8
F Traffic < 30 kN vehicle 0.7 0.7 0.6
G Traffic < 160 kN vehicle 0.7 0.5 0.3
H Roofs 0.7 0 0
Snow, altitude < 1000 m 0.5 0.2 0
Wind 0.5 0.2 0
Serviceability Limit State (SLS)
COMBINATION OF ACTIONS FOR SERVICEABILITY LIMIT STATE
(EN1990,cl.6.5.3)
Characteristic combination
Equation 6.14b
Ed=Gk +Qk,1 + ψ0 Qk,2
Frequent combination
Equation 6.15b
Ed=Gk + ψ1Qk,1 + ψ2 Qk,2
Quasi-permanent combination
Equation 6.16b
Ed=Gk + ψ2Qk,1
Characteristic value of variable actions
For each variable action there are four representative values:
1.The characteristic value Qk (determine by insufficient data).
2.The combination value ψ0Qk (of an action is intended to take account of the
reduced probability of the simultaneous of two or more variable actions).
3. Frequent value ψ1Qk (exceeded only for a short period of time and is used
primary for the SLS and also the accidental ULS).
4. Quasi-permanent value ψ2Qk (exceeded for a considerable period of time or
considered as an average loading over time and used for the long-term affects
at the SLS and also accidental and seismic ULS).
INDICATIVE LIMITING VALUES FOR VERTICAL DEFLECTIONS
(Manual of EC0 &EC1, Table D.1)
Serviceability Limit States
Vertical deflections
Serviceability Requirement Characteristic Combination (Expression 6.14b
in EC0) wmax
Function and damage to non-
structural elements (e.g.
partition walls claddings etc)
–Brittle
-Non-brittle
Function and damage to
structural elements
≤L/500 to L/360
≤L/300 to L/200
≤L/300 to L/200
Serviceability Limit State (SLS) – Vertical and Horizontal deformations
INDICATIVE LIMITING VALUES FOR HORIZONTAL DEFLECTIONS
(Manual of EC0 &EC1, Table D.2)
Serviceability Limit States
Vertical deflections
Serviceability Requirement Characteristic Combination (Expression 6.14b
in EC0) wmax
Function and damage to non-
structural elements
–Single storey buildings top
of column
-Each storey in a multi-storey
building
-The structure as a whole for
a multi-storey building
u≤H/300
u≤H/500 to H/300
u≤H/500
Category of use
(EN1991-1-1:2002,Table 6.1)
Category Specific Use Example
A Area for domestic and
residential activities
Rooms in residential buildings and houses bedrooms and wards in
hospitals, bedrooms in hotels and hostels kitchens and toilets
B Office areas
C Areas where people may
congregate (with the
exception of areas
defined under category
A, B, and D1))
C1: Areas with tables, etc. e.g. areas in schools, cafés, restaurants,
dining
halls, reading rooms, receptions.
C2: Areas with fixed seats, e.g. areas in churches, theatres or
cinemas, conference rooms, lecture halls, assembly halls, waiting
rooms, railway waiting rooms.
C3: Areas without obstacles for moving
people, e.g. areas in museums, exhibition rooms, etc. and access
areas in public and administration buildings, hotels, hospitals,
railway station forecourts.
C4: Areas with possible physical activities, e.g. dance halls,
gymnastic rooms, stages.
C5: Areas susceptible to large crowds, e.g. in buildings for public
events like concert halls, sports halls including stands, terraces and
access areas and railway platforms.
D Shopping areas D1: Areas in general retail shops
D2:Areas in departments stores
Imposed loads
(EN 1991-1-1:2002, Table 6.2)
Category Of loaded areas qk
(kN/m2
)
Qk
(kN)
Category A
-Floors
-Stairs
-Balconies
Category B
Category C
-C1
-C2
-C3
-C4
-C5
Category D
-D1
-D2
1.5-2.0
2.0-4.0
2.5-4.0
2.0-3.0
2.0-3.0
3.0-4.0
3.0-5.0
4.5-5.0
5.0-7.5
4.0-5.0
4.0-5.0
2.0-3.0
2.0-4.0
2.0-3.0
1.5-4.5
3.0-4.0
2.5-7.0
4.0-7.0
3.5-7.0
3.5-4.5
3.5-7.0
3.5-7.0Imposed load on Roof
(CYS NA EN1991-1-1, Table 6.10)
Sub-category Actions
Imposed load,
qk
(kN/m2
)
Q (kN)
H
Roof (inaccessible except for
normal maintenance and repair)
0.4 1.0
STRUCTURAL LOADS
(EN1991:2002)
Imposed Loads
Permanent load
(EN 1991-1-1:2002, Table A.1-A.12)
Materials Density, γ
(kN/m3
)
Modulus of
Elasticity, E
kN/mm2
Reinforced Concrete
Steel
Glass
Water
Plastic PTFE
Softwood timber
Hardwood timber
Concrete blockwork
Asphalt
Roof tiles
Soil (Sand)
Soil (Clay)
Insulation board
Aluminium
Copper
Cement mortar
Νylon
Epoxy resin
Polystyrene
Carbon fibre
Fibre glass
Granite
25
78
25
10
21-22
5
7
18
22
20
16-18
20-22
3
27
87-89
19-23
11.5
16-20
10-13
20
15
26
17-31
210
74
-
0.3-0.6
10
12
-
-
5-30
-
-
-
69
96
20-31
2-3.5
20
3-3.3
415
10
40-70
Permanent Loads
Typical unit floor Typical loadings Typical unit floor Typical loadings
Steel floor kN/m2
Self weight of beam 0.25
Self weight of decking 0.10
Self weight of meshing 0.05
Ceiling and services 0.15
Total 0.55
Internal ConcreteFloor kN/m2
Partition (minimum) 1.00
Screed (5-70cm) 1.20-1.80
Raised floor 0.40
Concrete floor (15cm) 3.75
Celling and services 0.15
Total 6.50-7.10
External Concrete Floor kN/m2
Slabs / paving 0.95
Screed (50cm) 1.20
Asphalt waterproofing 0.45
Concrete floor (15cm) 3.75
Celling and services 0.15
Total 6.50
Metal deck roofing kN/m2
Live loading: snow/
wind uplift 0.6-1.0
Outer covering, insulation and
metal deck liner 0.30
Purlins-150 deep at 1.5m c/c 0.10
Services 0.10
Total 1.1-1.5
Timber Floor kN/m2
Partition 1.00
Timber boards/plywood 0.15
Timber joist 0.20
Celling and services 0.15
Total 1.50
Timber Flat Roof kN/m2
Asphalt waterproofing 0.45
Timber joist and insulation 0.20
Celling and services 0.15
Total 0.80
SNOW LOAD
(EN1991-1-3)
Snow load on roof for transient design situations
s=μiCeCtsk
(EN 1991-1-3Equ.5.1)
Snow load shape coefficients, μ
(EN1991-1-3, Table 5.2)
Angle of pitch of
roof, a
0ο
≤α≤30ο
30ο
≤α≤60ο
α≥60ο
μ1 0.8 0.8(60-α)/30 0
μ2 0.8+0.8 α/30 1.6 -
For monopitch roof use only μ1
For pitched roof use μ1andμ2
THERMAL COEFFICIENTS C
(ΕΝ1991-1-3¨2003, cl. 5.2(8))
Ct=1.0
Thermal transmission on the roof
<1W/m2
K
Exposure coefficient(ΕΝ1991-1-3, Table 5.1)
Topography Ce
Windswept 0.8
Normal 1.0
Sheltered 1.2
CHARACTERISTIC SNOW LOAD
ON GROUND,sk (kN/m2
)
(CYS NA ΕΝ1991-1-3, cl. NA 2.7)
sk = 0.289*(1+(A/452)2
)
A:is the attitude above sea level (m)
Snow load shape coefficients for cylinder roofs, μ
(EN1991-1-3, Eq. 5.4-5.5)
μ1 0.8 μs=0 a≤15o
μ2 μs+μw
μw=(b1+b2)/2h ≤ γh/sk Range must:0.8≤μw≤4
γ:is the weight density of snow may taken as 2kN/m3
Angle of pitch of roof, a β>60ο
β≤60
μ3 should be less than μ3≤2 0 0.2+10 h/b
Monopitch roof Pitch roof Cylinder roof
WIND LOAD
(EN1991-1-4)
Fundamental Basic wind velocity, vb,0
(CYS NA EN1991-1-4,Fig.1)
Directional factor
(CYSEN1991-1-4,NA 2.4)
cdir=1.0
(Conservative value for all direction)
Season factor
(CYS EN1991-1-4,NA 2.4)
cseason=1.0
Basic wind velocity
(EN1991-1-4, Eq. 4.1)
vb=cdir.cseasonvb,0
BASIC WIND VELOCITY
STRUCTURAL FACTOR
(EN1991-1-4, cl.6.0)
cscd =1.0
Builiding with less than
h≤15m
Natural frequency
f≤5Hz
Walls≤100m high Chimney with circular
cross-sectional area and,
h≤60m
h≤6.5·diameter
h
Determination of cscd
Determine of structural factor cscd
Size factor
(EN1991-1-4,Eq.6.2)
It is on the safe side to use
B2
=1 kp=3
Calculation of R2
can be found in Annex B of
EN1991-1-4:2005
Can be found
Dynamic factor
(EN1991-1-4,Eq.6.3)
It is on the safe side to use
B2
=1 kp=3
Calculation of R2
can be found in Annex B of
EN1991-1-4:2005
Consider Ignore
Upwind Slope≤3o
NOYES
TERRAIN OROGRAPHY,
(EN1991-1-4, cl.4.3.3)
Detail calculation of terrain orography
factor can be found in Annex A of
EN1991-1-4:2005
PEAK VELOCITY PRESSURE
Roughness factor, cr(z)
(EN1991-1-4,Eq.4.3-4.5)
cr(z)=kr . ln(z/z0) for zmin≤z≤zmax
cr(z)=cr . (zmin) for z≤zmin
z0: is the roughness length
Maximum height, zmax
(EN1991-1-4, cl. 4.3.2)
zmax=200m
Orography factor co(z)
co(z)=1
Terrain factor,
(EN1991-1-4,cl.4.4)
kr=0.19(z0/z0,II)0.07
Mean wind velocity, vm(z)
(EN1991-1-4 cl.4.3.1 )
vm(z)=cr(z).co(z).vb
Wind turbulence, Iv(z)
(EN1991-1-4,Eq.4.7)
Iv(z)=σv/vm(z)=kl/co(z)ln(z/z0) for
zmin≤z≤zmax
Iv(z)=Iv(zmin) for z≤zmin
Turbulence factor: kl=1.0
(NA CYS EN1991-1-4, cl. NA 2.10)
Note: for co(z)=1 Iv(z) is not important
Peak velocity pressure, qpeak(z)
(EN1991-1-4 Eq.4.8 )
qpeak(z)=[1+7 Iv(z)]0.5ρ vm
2
(z)=ce(z)·0.5·ρ·vb
2
Air density:ρ=1.25kg/m3
Terrain category and terrain parameters (EN1991-1-4, Tab.:4.1)
Terrain
category
Description z0 (m) zmin(m)
0
Sea, costal area exposed to the open
sea.
SEA 0.003 1
I
Lakes or area with negligible
vegetation and without obstacles.
COUNTRY
0.01 1
II
Area with low vegetation such as
grass and isolated obstacles trees,
buildings) with separations of at least
20 obstacle height.
0.05 2
III
Area with regular cover of vegetation
or buildings or woth isolatd obstacles
with seperations of maximum 20
obstacle height (such as villages,
suburban terrain, permanent forest). TOWN
0.3 5
IV*
Area in which at least 15% of the
surface is covered with building and
their average height exceeds 15m.
1.0 10
*
For buildings in terrain category IV, displacement height hdis should be consider and information can be found in Aneex A.5 of EN1991-1-4:2005
Values of external pressure coefficient for vertical walls of rectangular plan buildings
(EN1991-1-4, Tab.:4.1)
ZONE A B C D E
h/d cpe,10 cpe,1 cpe,10 cpe,1 cpe,10 cpe,1 cpe,10 cpe,1 cpe,10 cpe,1
5 -1.2 -1.4 -0.8 -1.1 -0.5 +0.8 +1.0 -0.7
1 -1.2 -1.4 -0.8 -1.1 -0.5 +0.8 +1.0 -0.5
≤0.25 -1.2 -1.4 -0.8 -1.1 -0.5 +0.7 +1.0 -0.3
Note: Values for cpe,1 are intended for the design of small elements and fixings with an element of 1m2
or
less such as cladding elements and roofing elements. Values for cpe,10 may be used for the design of the
overall load bearing structure of buildings. The external pressure coeffiecient cpe,1 and cpe,10 is using for
loadaded area of 1m2
and 10m2
respectively.
Reference height ze, depending on h and b, and corresponding velocity pressure profile
(EN1991-1-4, Fig. 7.4)
Key for vertical walls – Flat Roof
(EN1991-1-4, Fig.7.5)
Key for vertical walls –Mono&dual pitch
Roof
(EN1991-1-4, Fig.7.5)
Pressure on surface &Wind force (EN1991-1-4, Eq. 5.1&5.5)
we=qp(ze).(cpe +cpi) & Fw=cscd·Σwe·Aref
EXTERNAL WIND PRESSURE/FORCE ON WALLS
EXTERNAL WIND PRESSURE/FORCE ON FLAT ROOF
Recommended values of external pressure coefficients for flat roofs
(EN1991-1-4,Tab. 7.2)
Roof type
Zone
F G H I
cpe,10 cpe,1 cpe,10 cpe,1 cpe,10 cpe,1 cpe,10 cpe,1
Sharp eaves -1.8 -2.5 -1.2 -2.0 -.07 -1.2 +0.2
With
Parapets
hp/h=0.025 -1.6 -2.2 -1.1 -1.8 -0.7 -1.2 -0.2
hp/h=0.05 -1.4 -2.0 -0.9 -1.6 -0.7 -1.2 +0.2
hp/h=0.10 -1.2 -1.8 -0.8 -1.4 -0.7 -1.2 -0.2
Curved
Eaves
r/h=0.05 -1.0 -1.5 -1.2 -1.8 -0.4 +0.2
r/h=0.10 -0.7 -1.2 -0.8 -1.4 -0.3 -0.2
r/h=0.20 -0.5 -0.8 -0.5 -0.8 -0.3 +0.2
Mansard
Eaves
a=30o
-1.0 -1.5 -1.0 -1.5 -0.3 -0.2
a=45o
-1.2 -1.8 -1.3 -1.9 -0.4 +0.2
a=60o
-1.3 -1.9 -1.3 -1.9 -0.5 -0.2
Note: Values for cpe,1 are intended for the design of small elements and fixings with an element of 1m2
or
less such as cladding elements and roofing elements. Values for cpe,10 may be used for the design of the
overall load bearing structure of buildings. The external pressure coeffiecient cpe,1 and cpe,10 is using for
loadaded area of 1m2
and 10m2
respectively.
Pressure on surface &Wind force (EN1991-1-4, Eq. 5.1&5.5)
we=qp(ze).(cpe +cpi) & Fw=cscd·Σwe·Aref
Recommended values of external pressure coefficients for monopitch roofs
(EN1991-1-4,Tab. 7.3a)
Pitch
Angle
a
Zone for wind direction θ=0o
Zone for wind direction θ=180o
F G H F G H
cpe,10 cpe,1 cpe,10 cpe,10 cpe,1 cpe,10 cpe,10 cpe,1 cpe,10 cpe,1 cpe,10 cpe,1
5o
-1.7 -2.5 -1.2 -2.0 -0.6 -1.2 -2.3
-2.5 -1.3 -2.0 -0.8 -1.2
+0.0 +0.0 +0.0
15o
-0.9 -2.0 -0.8 -1.5 -0.3
-2.5 -2.8 -1.3 -2.0 -0/9 -1.2
+0.2 +0.2 +0.2
30o
-0.5 -1.5 -0.5 -1.5 -0.2
-1.1 -2.3 -0.8 -1.5 -0.8
+0.7 +0.7 +0.4
45o
-0.0 -0.0 -0.0
-0.6 -1.3 -0.5 -0.7
+0.7 +0.7 +0.6
60o
+0.7 +0.7 +0.7 -0.5 -1.0 -0.5 -0.5
75o
+0.8 +0.8 +0.8 -0.5 -1.0 -0.5 -0.5
Recommended values of external pressure coefficients for monopitch roofs
(EN1991-1-4,Tab. 7.3b)
Pitch
Angle
a
Zone for wind direction θ=90o
Fup Flow G H I
cpe,10 cpe,1 cpe,10 cpe,10 cpe,1 cpe,10 cpe,10 cpe,1 cpe,10 cpe,1
5o
-2.1 -2.6 -2.1 -2.4 -1.8 -2.0 -0.6 -1.2 -0.5
15o
-2.4 -2.9 -1.6 -2.4 -1.9 -2.5 -0.8 -1.2 -0.7 -1.2
30o
-2.1 -2.9 -1.3 -2.0 -1.5 -2.0 -1.0 -1.3 -0.8 -1.2
45o
-1.5 -2.4 -1.3 -2.0 -1.4 -2.0 -1.0 -1.3 -0.9 -1.2
60o
-1.2 -2.0 -1.2 -2.0 -1.2 -2.0 -1.0 -1.3 -0.7 -1.2
75o
-1.2 -2.0 -1.2 -2.0 -1.2 -2.0 -1.0 -1.3 -0.5
Note: Values for cpe,1 are intended for the design of small elements and fixings with an element of 1m2
or less such
as cladding elements and roofing elements. Values for cpe,10 may be used for the design of the overall load bearing
structure of buildings. The external pressure coeffiecient cpe,1 and cpe,10 is using for loadaded area of 1m2
and 10m2
respectively.
EXTERNAL WIND PRESSURE/FORCE ON MONOPITCH ROOF
Pressure on surface &Wind force (EN1991-1-4, Eq. 5.1&5.5)
we=qp(ze).(cpe +cpi) & Fw=cscd·Σwe·Aref
Recommended values of external pressure coefficients for duopitch roofs
(EN1991-1-4,Tab. 7.4a)
Pitch
Angle
a
Zone for wind direction θ=0o
F G H I J
cpe,10 cpe,1 cpe,10 cpe,10 cpe,1 cpe,10 cpe,10 cpe,1 cpe,10 cpe,1
-45o
-0.6 -0.6 -0.8 -0.7 -1.0 -1.5
-30o
-1.1 -2.0 -0.8 -1.5 -0.8 -0.6 -0.8 -1.4
-15 o
-2.5 -2.8 -1.3 -2.0 -0.8 -1.2 -0.5 -0.7 -1.2
-5 o
-2.3 -2.5 -1.2 -2.0 -0.8 -1.2
+0.2 +0.2
-0.6 -0.6
5 o -1.7 -2.5 -1.2 -2.0 -0.6 -1.2
-0.6
+0.2
+0.0 +0.0 +0.0 -0.6
15 o -0.9 -2.0 -0.8 -1.5 -0.3 -0.4 -1.0 -1.5
+0.2 +0.2 +0.2 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0
30 o -0.5 -1.5 -0.5 -1.5 -0.2 -0.4 -0.5
+0.7 +0.7 +0.4 +0.0 +0.0
45 o -0.0 -0.0 -0.0 -0.2 -0.3
+0.7 +0.7 +0.6 +0.0 +0.0
60 o
+0.7 +0.7 +0.7 -0.2 -0.3
75 o
+0.8 +0.8 +0.8 -0.2 -0.3
Recommended values of external pressure coefficients for duopitch roofs
(EN1991-1-4,Tab. 7.4b)
Pitch
Angle a
Zone for wind direction θ=90o
F G H I
cpe,10 cpe,1 cpe,10 cpe,10 cpe,1 cpe,10 cpe,10 cpe,1
-45o
-1.4 -2.0 -1.2 -2.0 -1.0 -1.3 -0.9 -1.2
-30o
-1.5 -2.1 -1.2 -2.0 -1.0 -1.3 -0.9 -1.2
-15o
-1.9 -2.5 -1.2 -2.0 -0.8 -1.2 -0.8 -1.2
-5o
-1.8 -2.5 -1.2 -2.0 -0.7 -1.2 -0.6 -1.2
5o
-1.6 -2.2 -1.2 -2.0 -0.7 -1.2 -0.6
15o
-1.3 -2.0 -1.2 -2.0 -0.6 -1.2 -0.5
30o
-1.1 -1.5 -1.4 -2.0 -0.8 -1.2 -0.5
45o
-1.1 -1.5 -1.4 -2.0 -0.9 -1.2 -0.5
60o
-1.1 -1.5 -1.4 -2.0 -0.8 -1.2 -0.5
75o
-1.1 -1.5 -1.4 -2.0 -0.8 -1.2 -0.5
EXTERNAL WIND PRESSURE/FORCE ON DUOPITCH ROOF
Pressure on surface &Wind force (EN1991-1-4, Eq. 5.1&5.5)
we=qp(ze).(cpe +cpi) & Fw=cscd·Σwe·Aref

Contenu connexe

Tendances

i s code 1893:2002
i s code 1893:2002i s code 1893:2002
i s code 1893:2002Ram1239
 
Response Spectrum Modal Analysis of Buildings using Spreadsheets
Response Spectrum Modal Analysis of Buildings using SpreadsheetsResponse Spectrum Modal Analysis of Buildings using Spreadsheets
Response Spectrum Modal Analysis of Buildings using SpreadsheetsIJMER
 
The design of earth-retaining structures - Lecture 2
The design of earth-retaining structures - Lecture 2The design of earth-retaining structures - Lecture 2
The design of earth-retaining structures - Lecture 2Chris Bridges
 
Ap's IS-1893.1.2002
Ap's IS-1893.1.2002Ap's IS-1893.1.2002
Ap's IS-1893.1.2002Ayaz Pirkhan
 
Elastic and Dynamic analysis of a multistorey frame
Elastic and Dynamic analysis of a multistorey frameElastic and Dynamic analysis of a multistorey frame
Elastic and Dynamic analysis of a multistorey frameNayan Kumar Dutta
 
Linear Dynamic Analysis and Seismic Evaluation of RC Building
Linear Dynamic Analysis and Seismic Evaluation of RC BuildingLinear Dynamic Analysis and Seismic Evaluation of RC Building
Linear Dynamic Analysis and Seismic Evaluation of RC BuildingQudsia Wahab, EIT
 
Design of earth-retaining structures - Lecture 5
Design of earth-retaining structures - Lecture 5Design of earth-retaining structures - Lecture 5
Design of earth-retaining structures - Lecture 5Chris Bridges
 
IRJET - A Study on Behaviour of RCC Structures for Near and Far Field Earthqu...
IRJET - A Study on Behaviour of RCC Structures for Near and Far Field Earthqu...IRJET - A Study on Behaviour of RCC Structures for Near and Far Field Earthqu...
IRJET - A Study on Behaviour of RCC Structures for Near and Far Field Earthqu...IRJET Journal
 
Seismic Design of Buried Structures in PH and NZ
Seismic Design of Buried Structures in PH and NZSeismic Design of Buried Structures in PH and NZ
Seismic Design of Buried Structures in PH and NZLawrence Galvez
 
Comparative Parametric Study of Seismic Behaviour of RC Framed Building With ...
Comparative Parametric Study of Seismic Behaviour of RC Framed Building With ...Comparative Parametric Study of Seismic Behaviour of RC Framed Building With ...
Comparative Parametric Study of Seismic Behaviour of RC Framed Building With ...IRJET Journal
 

Tendances (19)

i s code 1893:2002
i s code 1893:2002i s code 1893:2002
i s code 1893:2002
 
Response Spectrum Modal Analysis of Buildings using Spreadsheets
Response Spectrum Modal Analysis of Buildings using SpreadsheetsResponse Spectrum Modal Analysis of Buildings using Spreadsheets
Response Spectrum Modal Analysis of Buildings using Spreadsheets
 
Earth retaining 2
Earth retaining 2Earth retaining 2
Earth retaining 2
 
The design of earth-retaining structures - Lecture 2
The design of earth-retaining structures - Lecture 2The design of earth-retaining structures - Lecture 2
The design of earth-retaining structures - Lecture 2
 
Ap's IS-1893.1.2002
Ap's IS-1893.1.2002Ap's IS-1893.1.2002
Ap's IS-1893.1.2002
 
Q01222110120
Q01222110120Q01222110120
Q01222110120
 
Pecker salencon
Pecker salenconPecker salencon
Pecker salencon
 
Elastic and Dynamic analysis of a multistorey frame
Elastic and Dynamic analysis of a multistorey frameElastic and Dynamic analysis of a multistorey frame
Elastic and Dynamic analysis of a multistorey frame
 
Dynamics Project
Dynamics ProjectDynamics Project
Dynamics Project
 
Mars Exploration Rover Opportunity Simulations of Traverses on Matijevic Hill...
Mars Exploration Rover Opportunity Simulations of Traverses on Matijevic Hill...Mars Exploration Rover Opportunity Simulations of Traverses on Matijevic Hill...
Mars Exploration Rover Opportunity Simulations of Traverses on Matijevic Hill...
 
Linear Dynamic Analysis and Seismic Evaluation of RC Building
Linear Dynamic Analysis and Seismic Evaluation of RC BuildingLinear Dynamic Analysis and Seismic Evaluation of RC Building
Linear Dynamic Analysis and Seismic Evaluation of RC Building
 
stress-and-strain
stress-and-strainstress-and-strain
stress-and-strain
 
D012211830
D012211830D012211830
D012211830
 
Design of earth-retaining structures - Lecture 5
Design of earth-retaining structures - Lecture 5Design of earth-retaining structures - Lecture 5
Design of earth-retaining structures - Lecture 5
 
IRJET - A Study on Behaviour of RCC Structures for Near and Far Field Earthqu...
IRJET - A Study on Behaviour of RCC Structures for Near and Far Field Earthqu...IRJET - A Study on Behaviour of RCC Structures for Near and Far Field Earthqu...
IRJET - A Study on Behaviour of RCC Structures for Near and Far Field Earthqu...
 
FRSP_SAndreev_REL
FRSP_SAndreev_RELFRSP_SAndreev_REL
FRSP_SAndreev_REL
 
Seismic Design of Buried Structures in PH and NZ
Seismic Design of Buried Structures in PH and NZSeismic Design of Buried Structures in PH and NZ
Seismic Design of Buried Structures in PH and NZ
 
K012256874
K012256874K012256874
K012256874
 
Comparative Parametric Study of Seismic Behaviour of RC Framed Building With ...
Comparative Parametric Study of Seismic Behaviour of RC Framed Building With ...Comparative Parametric Study of Seismic Behaviour of RC Framed Building With ...
Comparative Parametric Study of Seismic Behaviour of RC Framed Building With ...
 

Similaire à Loadings snow-wind-130320152424-phpapp01 (1)

Effect of Orientation on Response Spectrum Analysis of Plan Irregular Building
Effect of Orientation on Response Spectrum Analysis of Plan Irregular BuildingEffect of Orientation on Response Spectrum Analysis of Plan Irregular Building
Effect of Orientation on Response Spectrum Analysis of Plan Irregular BuildingIRJET Journal
 
Explanatory Examples on Ductile Detailing of RC Buildings.pdf
Explanatory Examples on Ductile Detailing of RC Buildings.pdfExplanatory Examples on Ductile Detailing of RC Buildings.pdf
Explanatory Examples on Ductile Detailing of RC Buildings.pdfNagaManikantaTatikon
 
IRJET- Collapse Analysis of Irregular Flat Slab Structure at different Seismi...
IRJET- Collapse Analysis of Irregular Flat Slab Structure at different Seismi...IRJET- Collapse Analysis of Irregular Flat Slab Structure at different Seismi...
IRJET- Collapse Analysis of Irregular Flat Slab Structure at different Seismi...IRJET Journal
 
ANALYSIS & DESIGN OF G+3 STORIED REINFORCED CONCRETE BUILDING
ANALYSIS & DESIGN OF G+3 STORIED REINFORCED CONCRETE BUILDING ANALYSIS & DESIGN OF G+3 STORIED REINFORCED CONCRETE BUILDING
ANALYSIS & DESIGN OF G+3 STORIED REINFORCED CONCRETE BUILDING Abhilash Chandra Dey
 
IRJET- Progressive Collapse of RCC Structure Due to Earthquake and Wind Load
IRJET-  Progressive Collapse of RCC Structure Due to Earthquake and Wind LoadIRJET-  Progressive Collapse of RCC Structure Due to Earthquake and Wind Load
IRJET- Progressive Collapse of RCC Structure Due to Earthquake and Wind LoadIRJET Journal
 
PRE - Technical improvements in EN 1990 - Andrew Bond - 2018.pdf
PRE - Technical improvements in EN 1990 - Andrew Bond - 2018.pdfPRE - Technical improvements in EN 1990 - Andrew Bond - 2018.pdf
PRE - Technical improvements in EN 1990 - Andrew Bond - 2018.pdfnebojsadj6411
 
Seismic Performance of Circular And Rectangular Column by Cyclic And Monotoni...
Seismic Performance of Circular And Rectangular Column by Cyclic And Monotoni...Seismic Performance of Circular And Rectangular Column by Cyclic And Monotoni...
Seismic Performance of Circular And Rectangular Column by Cyclic And Monotoni...IRJET Journal
 
COMPARISON OF ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF REGULAR AND IRREGULAR CONFIGURATION OF M...
COMPARISON OF ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF REGULAR AND IRREGULAR CONFIGURATION OF M...COMPARISON OF ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF REGULAR AND IRREGULAR CONFIGURATION OF M...
COMPARISON OF ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF REGULAR AND IRREGULAR CONFIGURATION OF M...IRJET Journal
 
Reinforced concrete Course assignments, 2019
Reinforced concrete Course assignments, 2019Reinforced concrete Course assignments, 2019
Reinforced concrete Course assignments, 2019JanneHanka
 
SEISMIC CODES OF PAKISTAN.pptx
SEISMIC CODES OF PAKISTAN.pptxSEISMIC CODES OF PAKISTAN.pptx
SEISMIC CODES OF PAKISTAN.pptxHafizaKhan11
 
INTRODUCTION TO STRUCUTRAL DESIGN RCC PRESENTATION
INTRODUCTION TO STRUCUTRAL DESIGN RCC PRESENTATIONINTRODUCTION TO STRUCUTRAL DESIGN RCC PRESENTATION
INTRODUCTION TO STRUCUTRAL DESIGN RCC PRESENTATIONjay sinha
 
IRJET- Seismic Response of Flat Slab Buildings with Shear Wall
IRJET-  	  Seismic Response of Flat Slab Buildings with Shear WallIRJET-  	  Seismic Response of Flat Slab Buildings with Shear Wall
IRJET- Seismic Response of Flat Slab Buildings with Shear WallIRJET Journal
 
IRJET- Securing an IoT Based Home using Digital Image Processing and an Andro...
IRJET- Securing an IoT Based Home using Digital Image Processing and an Andro...IRJET- Securing an IoT Based Home using Digital Image Processing and an Andro...
IRJET- Securing an IoT Based Home using Digital Image Processing and an Andro...IRJET Journal
 
IRJET- Effect of Bracing Pattern on the L Shape of RCC Tall Building due to W...
IRJET- Effect of Bracing Pattern on the L Shape of RCC Tall Building due to W...IRJET- Effect of Bracing Pattern on the L Shape of RCC Tall Building due to W...
IRJET- Effect of Bracing Pattern on the L Shape of RCC Tall Building due to W...IRJET Journal
 
An analysis of multi-storey building with floating and non-floating column un...
An analysis of multi-storey building with floating and non-floating column un...An analysis of multi-storey building with floating and non-floating column un...
An analysis of multi-storey building with floating and non-floating column un...IRJET Journal
 
DYNAMIC ANALYSIS AND GEOMETRY DESIGN OF FLOATING OFFSHORE WIND TURBINE (FOWTS)
DYNAMIC ANALYSIS AND GEOMETRY DESIGN OF FLOATING OFFSHORE WIND TURBINE (FOWTS)DYNAMIC ANALYSIS AND GEOMETRY DESIGN OF FLOATING OFFSHORE WIND TURBINE (FOWTS)
DYNAMIC ANALYSIS AND GEOMETRY DESIGN OF FLOATING OFFSHORE WIND TURBINE (FOWTS)IRJET Journal
 

Similaire à Loadings snow-wind-130320152424-phpapp01 (1) (20)

Effect of Orientation on Response Spectrum Analysis of Plan Irregular Building
Effect of Orientation on Response Spectrum Analysis of Plan Irregular BuildingEffect of Orientation on Response Spectrum Analysis of Plan Irregular Building
Effect of Orientation on Response Spectrum Analysis of Plan Irregular Building
 
Explanatory Examples on Ductile Detailing of RC Buildings.pdf
Explanatory Examples on Ductile Detailing of RC Buildings.pdfExplanatory Examples on Ductile Detailing of RC Buildings.pdf
Explanatory Examples on Ductile Detailing of RC Buildings.pdf
 
EQ06.pdf
EQ06.pdfEQ06.pdf
EQ06.pdf
 
IRJET- Collapse Analysis of Irregular Flat Slab Structure at different Seismi...
IRJET- Collapse Analysis of Irregular Flat Slab Structure at different Seismi...IRJET- Collapse Analysis of Irregular Flat Slab Structure at different Seismi...
IRJET- Collapse Analysis of Irregular Flat Slab Structure at different Seismi...
 
Vortrag NH905
Vortrag NH905Vortrag NH905
Vortrag NH905
 
ANALYSIS & DESIGN OF G+3 STORIED REINFORCED CONCRETE BUILDING
ANALYSIS & DESIGN OF G+3 STORIED REINFORCED CONCRETE BUILDING ANALYSIS & DESIGN OF G+3 STORIED REINFORCED CONCRETE BUILDING
ANALYSIS & DESIGN OF G+3 STORIED REINFORCED CONCRETE BUILDING
 
IRJET- Progressive Collapse of RCC Structure Due to Earthquake and Wind Load
IRJET-  Progressive Collapse of RCC Structure Due to Earthquake and Wind LoadIRJET-  Progressive Collapse of RCC Structure Due to Earthquake and Wind Load
IRJET- Progressive Collapse of RCC Structure Due to Earthquake and Wind Load
 
Loadings snow - wind
Loadings   snow - windLoadings   snow - wind
Loadings snow - wind
 
PRE - Technical improvements in EN 1990 - Andrew Bond - 2018.pdf
PRE - Technical improvements in EN 1990 - Andrew Bond - 2018.pdfPRE - Technical improvements in EN 1990 - Andrew Bond - 2018.pdf
PRE - Technical improvements in EN 1990 - Andrew Bond - 2018.pdf
 
Seismic Performance of Circular And Rectangular Column by Cyclic And Monotoni...
Seismic Performance of Circular And Rectangular Column by Cyclic And Monotoni...Seismic Performance of Circular And Rectangular Column by Cyclic And Monotoni...
Seismic Performance of Circular And Rectangular Column by Cyclic And Monotoni...
 
COMPARISON OF ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF REGULAR AND IRREGULAR CONFIGURATION OF M...
COMPARISON OF ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF REGULAR AND IRREGULAR CONFIGURATION OF M...COMPARISON OF ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF REGULAR AND IRREGULAR CONFIGURATION OF M...
COMPARISON OF ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF REGULAR AND IRREGULAR CONFIGURATION OF M...
 
Reinforced concrete Course assignments, 2019
Reinforced concrete Course assignments, 2019Reinforced concrete Course assignments, 2019
Reinforced concrete Course assignments, 2019
 
SEISMIC CODES OF PAKISTAN.pptx
SEISMIC CODES OF PAKISTAN.pptxSEISMIC CODES OF PAKISTAN.pptx
SEISMIC CODES OF PAKISTAN.pptx
 
INTRODUCTION TO STRUCUTRAL DESIGN RCC PRESENTATION
INTRODUCTION TO STRUCUTRAL DESIGN RCC PRESENTATIONINTRODUCTION TO STRUCUTRAL DESIGN RCC PRESENTATION
INTRODUCTION TO STRUCUTRAL DESIGN RCC PRESENTATION
 
IRJET- Seismic Response of Flat Slab Buildings with Shear Wall
IRJET-  	  Seismic Response of Flat Slab Buildings with Shear WallIRJET-  	  Seismic Response of Flat Slab Buildings with Shear Wall
IRJET- Seismic Response of Flat Slab Buildings with Shear Wall
 
IRJET- Securing an IoT Based Home using Digital Image Processing and an Andro...
IRJET- Securing an IoT Based Home using Digital Image Processing and an Andro...IRJET- Securing an IoT Based Home using Digital Image Processing and an Andro...
IRJET- Securing an IoT Based Home using Digital Image Processing and an Andro...
 
IRJET- Effect of Bracing Pattern on the L Shape of RCC Tall Building due to W...
IRJET- Effect of Bracing Pattern on the L Shape of RCC Tall Building due to W...IRJET- Effect of Bracing Pattern on the L Shape of RCC Tall Building due to W...
IRJET- Effect of Bracing Pattern on the L Shape of RCC Tall Building due to W...
 
Struds 2010(aug)
Struds 2010(aug)Struds 2010(aug)
Struds 2010(aug)
 
An analysis of multi-storey building with floating and non-floating column un...
An analysis of multi-storey building with floating and non-floating column un...An analysis of multi-storey building with floating and non-floating column un...
An analysis of multi-storey building with floating and non-floating column un...
 
DYNAMIC ANALYSIS AND GEOMETRY DESIGN OF FLOATING OFFSHORE WIND TURBINE (FOWTS)
DYNAMIC ANALYSIS AND GEOMETRY DESIGN OF FLOATING OFFSHORE WIND TURBINE (FOWTS)DYNAMIC ANALYSIS AND GEOMETRY DESIGN OF FLOATING OFFSHORE WIND TURBINE (FOWTS)
DYNAMIC ANALYSIS AND GEOMETRY DESIGN OF FLOATING OFFSHORE WIND TURBINE (FOWTS)
 

Loadings snow-wind-130320152424-phpapp01 (1)

  • 1. BASIS OF STRUCTURAL DESIGN (EN1990:2002) Ultimate limit state verification (EN1990,cl.6.4.1(1)P) The following ultimate limit states shall be verified as relevant: EQU: Loss of equilibrium of the structure, (considering for sliding, overturning or uplift) STR: Internal failure or excessive deformation of the structure of structural member (Design of structural for strength of members and frames), GEO: Failure due to excessive deformation of the ground (Design of structural members such as footing, piles, basement walls, etc.), FAT: Fatigue failure of the structure or structural member. Design working life (CYS NA EN1990,Table 2.1) Design working life category Indicative design working life (years) Examples 1 10 Temporary structures (1) 2 10 – 25 Replaceable structural parts, e.g. gantry girders, bearings 3 15 – 30 Agricultural and similar structures 4 50 Building structures and other common structures 5 100 Monumental building structures, bridges, and other civil engineering structures (1) Structures or parts of structures that can be dismantled with a view to being re-used should not be considered as temporary. In the case of replaceable structural parts the design life for the structural determination of loads should be the design life of the structure. Design Working life Ultimate Limit State (ULS) Ultimate Limit State Concern (EN1990,cl.3.3(1)P)  Safety of people,  Safety of the structure  Protection of the contents Design situations (EN1990,cl.3.2(2)P) Persistent design situation: Normal use condition Transient design situation: Temporary condition, e.g. during execution or repair Accidental design situation: Exceptional condition, e.g. fire, explosion, impact. Seismic design situation: Structure subject to seismic events.
  • 2. Ultimate Limit State (ULS) COMBINATION OF ACTIONS FOR PERSISTENT/TRANSIENT DESIGN SITUATION (EN1990,cl.6.4.3.2) Persistent and transient design situation – EQU Equation 6.10 (Set A) 6.10 Ed=ΣγG Gk +γQ Qk1 + γQ ψ0,2 Qk2 Action Favourable γ Unfavourable γ Permanent (dead, earth), γG 0.9 1.1 Variable (imposed, wind), γQ 0 1.5 Note: Single source is not applicable for EQU design situation. Different γ factors can be used in favourable and unfavourable areas. Persistent and transient design situation – STR/GEO Equation 6.10, 6.10a & 6.10b (Set B) 6.10 6.10a 6.10b Ed=ΣγG Gk +γQ Qk1 + γQ ψ0,2 Qk2 Ed=ΣξγG Gk +γQ ψ0,1 Qk1 + γQ ψ0,2 Qk2 Ed=ΣγG Gk +γQ Qk1 + γQ ψ0,2 Qk2 Action Favourable γ Unfavourable γ Permanent (dead, earth), γG 1.0 1.35 Variable (imposed, wind), γQ 0 1.5 Note: Single source is applicable for STR/GEO design situation. Persistent and transient design situation – GEO Equation 6.10 (Set C) 6.10 Ed=ΣγG Gk +γQ Qk1 + γQ ψ0,2 Qk2 Action Favourable γ Unfavourable γ Permanent (dead, earth), γG 1.0 1.0 Variable (imposed, wind), γQ 0 1.3 Note: Single source is applicable for STR/GEO design situation. Important notes (EN1990,cl.3.2(2)P)  Approach 2 (CYS NA EN1990,Table.A1.2(B)) should be used for the design of the structural members of substructure (i.e. footings, piles, basement walls, etc.) (CYS NA EN1990,cl. 2.2.3.4).  Actions that cannot exist simultaneously due to physical of functional reasons should not be considered together in combination.  The use of expression 6.10a and 6.10b lead to a more economic design in most circumstances. 
  • 3. Summary table of partial, combination and reduction factors for the STR and GEO ultimate limit states for buildings Expression Unfavourable Permanent action Unfavourable Variable actions Self-weight Imposed floor loads Wind loads Snow loads 6.10 γG=1.35 γQ,1 =1.5 γQ,iψ0,i =1.5x05=0.75 γQ,iψ0,i =1.5x05=0.75 γG=1.35 γQ,iψ0,i =1.5x07=1.05 γQ,1 =1.5 γQ,iψ0,i =1.5x05=0.75 γG=1.35 γQ,iψ0,i =1.5x07=1.05 γQ,iψ0,i =1.5x05=0.75 γQ,i =1.5 Less favourable equations 6.10a & 6.10b 6.10a γG=1.35 γQ,iψ0,i =1.5x07=1.05 γQ,iψ0,i =1.5x05=0.75 γQ,iψ0,i =1.5x05=0.75 γG=1.35 γQ,iψ0,i =1.5x07=1.05 γQ,iψ0,i =1.5x05=0.75 γQ,iψ0,i =1.5x05=0.75 γG=1.35 γQ,iψ0,i =1.5x07=1.05 γQ,iψ0,i =1.5x05=0.75 γQ,iψ0,i =1.5x05=0.75 6.10b ξγG=0.85*1.35 γQ,1 =1.5 γQ,iψ0,i =1.5x05=0.75 γQ,iψ0,i =1.5x05=0.75 ξγG=0.85*1.35 γQ,iψ0,i =1.5x07=1.05 γQ,1 =1.5 γQ,iψ0,i =1.5x05=0.75 ξγG=0.85*1.35 γQ,iψ0,i =1.5x07=1.05 γQ,iψ0,i =1.5x05=0.75 γQ,i =1.5 Note: Shaded boxes indicate the ‘leading variable action’, Combination (sensitivity) factor, ψ (CYS NA EN1990:2002, Table A1.1) Category Specific Use ψο ψ1 ψ2 A Domestic and residential 0.7 0.5 0.3 B Office 0.7 0.5 0.3 C Areas for Congregation 0.7 0.7 0.6 D Shopping 0.7 0.7 0.6 E Storage 1.0 0.9 0.8 F Traffic < 30 kN vehicle 0.7 0.7 0.6 G Traffic < 160 kN vehicle 0.7 0.5 0.3 H Roofs 0.7 0 0 Snow, altitude < 1000 m 0.5 0.2 0 Wind 0.5 0.2 0
  • 4. Serviceability Limit State (SLS) COMBINATION OF ACTIONS FOR SERVICEABILITY LIMIT STATE (EN1990,cl.6.5.3) Characteristic combination Equation 6.14b Ed=Gk +Qk,1 + ψ0 Qk,2 Frequent combination Equation 6.15b Ed=Gk + ψ1Qk,1 + ψ2 Qk,2 Quasi-permanent combination Equation 6.16b Ed=Gk + ψ2Qk,1 Characteristic value of variable actions For each variable action there are four representative values: 1.The characteristic value Qk (determine by insufficient data). 2.The combination value ψ0Qk (of an action is intended to take account of the reduced probability of the simultaneous of two or more variable actions). 3. Frequent value ψ1Qk (exceeded only for a short period of time and is used primary for the SLS and also the accidental ULS). 4. Quasi-permanent value ψ2Qk (exceeded for a considerable period of time or considered as an average loading over time and used for the long-term affects at the SLS and also accidental and seismic ULS). INDICATIVE LIMITING VALUES FOR VERTICAL DEFLECTIONS (Manual of EC0 &EC1, Table D.1) Serviceability Limit States Vertical deflections Serviceability Requirement Characteristic Combination (Expression 6.14b in EC0) wmax Function and damage to non- structural elements (e.g. partition walls claddings etc) –Brittle -Non-brittle Function and damage to structural elements ≤L/500 to L/360 ≤L/300 to L/200 ≤L/300 to L/200 Serviceability Limit State (SLS) – Vertical and Horizontal deformations
  • 5. INDICATIVE LIMITING VALUES FOR HORIZONTAL DEFLECTIONS (Manual of EC0 &EC1, Table D.2) Serviceability Limit States Vertical deflections Serviceability Requirement Characteristic Combination (Expression 6.14b in EC0) wmax Function and damage to non- structural elements –Single storey buildings top of column -Each storey in a multi-storey building -The structure as a whole for a multi-storey building u≤H/300 u≤H/500 to H/300 u≤H/500
  • 6. Category of use (EN1991-1-1:2002,Table 6.1) Category Specific Use Example A Area for domestic and residential activities Rooms in residential buildings and houses bedrooms and wards in hospitals, bedrooms in hotels and hostels kitchens and toilets B Office areas C Areas where people may congregate (with the exception of areas defined under category A, B, and D1)) C1: Areas with tables, etc. e.g. areas in schools, cafés, restaurants, dining halls, reading rooms, receptions. C2: Areas with fixed seats, e.g. areas in churches, theatres or cinemas, conference rooms, lecture halls, assembly halls, waiting rooms, railway waiting rooms. C3: Areas without obstacles for moving people, e.g. areas in museums, exhibition rooms, etc. and access areas in public and administration buildings, hotels, hospitals, railway station forecourts. C4: Areas with possible physical activities, e.g. dance halls, gymnastic rooms, stages. C5: Areas susceptible to large crowds, e.g. in buildings for public events like concert halls, sports halls including stands, terraces and access areas and railway platforms. D Shopping areas D1: Areas in general retail shops D2:Areas in departments stores Imposed loads (EN 1991-1-1:2002, Table 6.2) Category Of loaded areas qk (kN/m2 ) Qk (kN) Category A -Floors -Stairs -Balconies Category B Category C -C1 -C2 -C3 -C4 -C5 Category D -D1 -D2 1.5-2.0 2.0-4.0 2.5-4.0 2.0-3.0 2.0-3.0 3.0-4.0 3.0-5.0 4.5-5.0 5.0-7.5 4.0-5.0 4.0-5.0 2.0-3.0 2.0-4.0 2.0-3.0 1.5-4.5 3.0-4.0 2.5-7.0 4.0-7.0 3.5-7.0 3.5-4.5 3.5-7.0 3.5-7.0Imposed load on Roof (CYS NA EN1991-1-1, Table 6.10) Sub-category Actions Imposed load, qk (kN/m2 ) Q (kN) H Roof (inaccessible except for normal maintenance and repair) 0.4 1.0 STRUCTURAL LOADS (EN1991:2002) Imposed Loads
  • 7. Permanent load (EN 1991-1-1:2002, Table A.1-A.12) Materials Density, γ (kN/m3 ) Modulus of Elasticity, E kN/mm2 Reinforced Concrete Steel Glass Water Plastic PTFE Softwood timber Hardwood timber Concrete blockwork Asphalt Roof tiles Soil (Sand) Soil (Clay) Insulation board Aluminium Copper Cement mortar Νylon Epoxy resin Polystyrene Carbon fibre Fibre glass Granite 25 78 25 10 21-22 5 7 18 22 20 16-18 20-22 3 27 87-89 19-23 11.5 16-20 10-13 20 15 26 17-31 210 74 - 0.3-0.6 10 12 - - 5-30 - - - 69 96 20-31 2-3.5 20 3-3.3 415 10 40-70 Permanent Loads Typical unit floor Typical loadings Typical unit floor Typical loadings Steel floor kN/m2 Self weight of beam 0.25 Self weight of decking 0.10 Self weight of meshing 0.05 Ceiling and services 0.15 Total 0.55 Internal ConcreteFloor kN/m2 Partition (minimum) 1.00 Screed (5-70cm) 1.20-1.80 Raised floor 0.40 Concrete floor (15cm) 3.75 Celling and services 0.15 Total 6.50-7.10 External Concrete Floor kN/m2 Slabs / paving 0.95 Screed (50cm) 1.20 Asphalt waterproofing 0.45 Concrete floor (15cm) 3.75 Celling and services 0.15 Total 6.50 Metal deck roofing kN/m2 Live loading: snow/ wind uplift 0.6-1.0 Outer covering, insulation and metal deck liner 0.30 Purlins-150 deep at 1.5m c/c 0.10 Services 0.10 Total 1.1-1.5 Timber Floor kN/m2 Partition 1.00 Timber boards/plywood 0.15 Timber joist 0.20 Celling and services 0.15 Total 1.50 Timber Flat Roof kN/m2 Asphalt waterproofing 0.45 Timber joist and insulation 0.20 Celling and services 0.15 Total 0.80
  • 8. SNOW LOAD (EN1991-1-3) Snow load on roof for transient design situations s=μiCeCtsk (EN 1991-1-3Equ.5.1) Snow load shape coefficients, μ (EN1991-1-3, Table 5.2) Angle of pitch of roof, a 0ο ≤α≤30ο 30ο ≤α≤60ο α≥60ο μ1 0.8 0.8(60-α)/30 0 μ2 0.8+0.8 α/30 1.6 - For monopitch roof use only μ1 For pitched roof use μ1andμ2 THERMAL COEFFICIENTS C (ΕΝ1991-1-3¨2003, cl. 5.2(8)) Ct=1.0 Thermal transmission on the roof <1W/m2 K Exposure coefficient(ΕΝ1991-1-3, Table 5.1) Topography Ce Windswept 0.8 Normal 1.0 Sheltered 1.2 CHARACTERISTIC SNOW LOAD ON GROUND,sk (kN/m2 ) (CYS NA ΕΝ1991-1-3, cl. NA 2.7) sk = 0.289*(1+(A/452)2 ) A:is the attitude above sea level (m) Snow load shape coefficients for cylinder roofs, μ (EN1991-1-3, Eq. 5.4-5.5) μ1 0.8 μs=0 a≤15o μ2 μs+μw μw=(b1+b2)/2h ≤ γh/sk Range must:0.8≤μw≤4 γ:is the weight density of snow may taken as 2kN/m3 Angle of pitch of roof, a β>60ο β≤60 μ3 should be less than μ3≤2 0 0.2+10 h/b Monopitch roof Pitch roof Cylinder roof
  • 9. WIND LOAD (EN1991-1-4) Fundamental Basic wind velocity, vb,0 (CYS NA EN1991-1-4,Fig.1) Directional factor (CYSEN1991-1-4,NA 2.4) cdir=1.0 (Conservative value for all direction) Season factor (CYS EN1991-1-4,NA 2.4) cseason=1.0 Basic wind velocity (EN1991-1-4, Eq. 4.1) vb=cdir.cseasonvb,0 BASIC WIND VELOCITY
  • 10. STRUCTURAL FACTOR (EN1991-1-4, cl.6.0) cscd =1.0 Builiding with less than h≤15m Natural frequency f≤5Hz Walls≤100m high Chimney with circular cross-sectional area and, h≤60m h≤6.5·diameter h Determination of cscd Determine of structural factor cscd Size factor (EN1991-1-4,Eq.6.2) It is on the safe side to use B2 =1 kp=3 Calculation of R2 can be found in Annex B of EN1991-1-4:2005 Can be found Dynamic factor (EN1991-1-4,Eq.6.3) It is on the safe side to use B2 =1 kp=3 Calculation of R2 can be found in Annex B of EN1991-1-4:2005 Consider Ignore Upwind Slope≤3o NOYES TERRAIN OROGRAPHY, (EN1991-1-4, cl.4.3.3) Detail calculation of terrain orography factor can be found in Annex A of EN1991-1-4:2005
  • 11. PEAK VELOCITY PRESSURE Roughness factor, cr(z) (EN1991-1-4,Eq.4.3-4.5) cr(z)=kr . ln(z/z0) for zmin≤z≤zmax cr(z)=cr . (zmin) for z≤zmin z0: is the roughness length Maximum height, zmax (EN1991-1-4, cl. 4.3.2) zmax=200m Orography factor co(z) co(z)=1 Terrain factor, (EN1991-1-4,cl.4.4) kr=0.19(z0/z0,II)0.07 Mean wind velocity, vm(z) (EN1991-1-4 cl.4.3.1 ) vm(z)=cr(z).co(z).vb Wind turbulence, Iv(z) (EN1991-1-4,Eq.4.7) Iv(z)=σv/vm(z)=kl/co(z)ln(z/z0) for zmin≤z≤zmax Iv(z)=Iv(zmin) for z≤zmin Turbulence factor: kl=1.0 (NA CYS EN1991-1-4, cl. NA 2.10) Note: for co(z)=1 Iv(z) is not important Peak velocity pressure, qpeak(z) (EN1991-1-4 Eq.4.8 ) qpeak(z)=[1+7 Iv(z)]0.5ρ vm 2 (z)=ce(z)·0.5·ρ·vb 2 Air density:ρ=1.25kg/m3 Terrain category and terrain parameters (EN1991-1-4, Tab.:4.1) Terrain category Description z0 (m) zmin(m) 0 Sea, costal area exposed to the open sea. SEA 0.003 1 I Lakes or area with negligible vegetation and without obstacles. COUNTRY 0.01 1 II Area with low vegetation such as grass and isolated obstacles trees, buildings) with separations of at least 20 obstacle height. 0.05 2 III Area with regular cover of vegetation or buildings or woth isolatd obstacles with seperations of maximum 20 obstacle height (such as villages, suburban terrain, permanent forest). TOWN 0.3 5 IV* Area in which at least 15% of the surface is covered with building and their average height exceeds 15m. 1.0 10 * For buildings in terrain category IV, displacement height hdis should be consider and information can be found in Aneex A.5 of EN1991-1-4:2005
  • 12. Values of external pressure coefficient for vertical walls of rectangular plan buildings (EN1991-1-4, Tab.:4.1) ZONE A B C D E h/d cpe,10 cpe,1 cpe,10 cpe,1 cpe,10 cpe,1 cpe,10 cpe,1 cpe,10 cpe,1 5 -1.2 -1.4 -0.8 -1.1 -0.5 +0.8 +1.0 -0.7 1 -1.2 -1.4 -0.8 -1.1 -0.5 +0.8 +1.0 -0.5 ≤0.25 -1.2 -1.4 -0.8 -1.1 -0.5 +0.7 +1.0 -0.3 Note: Values for cpe,1 are intended for the design of small elements and fixings with an element of 1m2 or less such as cladding elements and roofing elements. Values for cpe,10 may be used for the design of the overall load bearing structure of buildings. The external pressure coeffiecient cpe,1 and cpe,10 is using for loadaded area of 1m2 and 10m2 respectively. Reference height ze, depending on h and b, and corresponding velocity pressure profile (EN1991-1-4, Fig. 7.4) Key for vertical walls – Flat Roof (EN1991-1-4, Fig.7.5) Key for vertical walls –Mono&dual pitch Roof (EN1991-1-4, Fig.7.5) Pressure on surface &Wind force (EN1991-1-4, Eq. 5.1&5.5) we=qp(ze).(cpe +cpi) & Fw=cscd·Σwe·Aref EXTERNAL WIND PRESSURE/FORCE ON WALLS
  • 13. EXTERNAL WIND PRESSURE/FORCE ON FLAT ROOF Recommended values of external pressure coefficients for flat roofs (EN1991-1-4,Tab. 7.2) Roof type Zone F G H I cpe,10 cpe,1 cpe,10 cpe,1 cpe,10 cpe,1 cpe,10 cpe,1 Sharp eaves -1.8 -2.5 -1.2 -2.0 -.07 -1.2 +0.2 With Parapets hp/h=0.025 -1.6 -2.2 -1.1 -1.8 -0.7 -1.2 -0.2 hp/h=0.05 -1.4 -2.0 -0.9 -1.6 -0.7 -1.2 +0.2 hp/h=0.10 -1.2 -1.8 -0.8 -1.4 -0.7 -1.2 -0.2 Curved Eaves r/h=0.05 -1.0 -1.5 -1.2 -1.8 -0.4 +0.2 r/h=0.10 -0.7 -1.2 -0.8 -1.4 -0.3 -0.2 r/h=0.20 -0.5 -0.8 -0.5 -0.8 -0.3 +0.2 Mansard Eaves a=30o -1.0 -1.5 -1.0 -1.5 -0.3 -0.2 a=45o -1.2 -1.8 -1.3 -1.9 -0.4 +0.2 a=60o -1.3 -1.9 -1.3 -1.9 -0.5 -0.2 Note: Values for cpe,1 are intended for the design of small elements and fixings with an element of 1m2 or less such as cladding elements and roofing elements. Values for cpe,10 may be used for the design of the overall load bearing structure of buildings. The external pressure coeffiecient cpe,1 and cpe,10 is using for loadaded area of 1m2 and 10m2 respectively. Pressure on surface &Wind force (EN1991-1-4, Eq. 5.1&5.5) we=qp(ze).(cpe +cpi) & Fw=cscd·Σwe·Aref
  • 14. Recommended values of external pressure coefficients for monopitch roofs (EN1991-1-4,Tab. 7.3a) Pitch Angle a Zone for wind direction θ=0o Zone for wind direction θ=180o F G H F G H cpe,10 cpe,1 cpe,10 cpe,10 cpe,1 cpe,10 cpe,10 cpe,1 cpe,10 cpe,1 cpe,10 cpe,1 5o -1.7 -2.5 -1.2 -2.0 -0.6 -1.2 -2.3 -2.5 -1.3 -2.0 -0.8 -1.2 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 15o -0.9 -2.0 -0.8 -1.5 -0.3 -2.5 -2.8 -1.3 -2.0 -0/9 -1.2 +0.2 +0.2 +0.2 30o -0.5 -1.5 -0.5 -1.5 -0.2 -1.1 -2.3 -0.8 -1.5 -0.8 +0.7 +0.7 +0.4 45o -0.0 -0.0 -0.0 -0.6 -1.3 -0.5 -0.7 +0.7 +0.7 +0.6 60o +0.7 +0.7 +0.7 -0.5 -1.0 -0.5 -0.5 75o +0.8 +0.8 +0.8 -0.5 -1.0 -0.5 -0.5 Recommended values of external pressure coefficients for monopitch roofs (EN1991-1-4,Tab. 7.3b) Pitch Angle a Zone for wind direction θ=90o Fup Flow G H I cpe,10 cpe,1 cpe,10 cpe,10 cpe,1 cpe,10 cpe,10 cpe,1 cpe,10 cpe,1 5o -2.1 -2.6 -2.1 -2.4 -1.8 -2.0 -0.6 -1.2 -0.5 15o -2.4 -2.9 -1.6 -2.4 -1.9 -2.5 -0.8 -1.2 -0.7 -1.2 30o -2.1 -2.9 -1.3 -2.0 -1.5 -2.0 -1.0 -1.3 -0.8 -1.2 45o -1.5 -2.4 -1.3 -2.0 -1.4 -2.0 -1.0 -1.3 -0.9 -1.2 60o -1.2 -2.0 -1.2 -2.0 -1.2 -2.0 -1.0 -1.3 -0.7 -1.2 75o -1.2 -2.0 -1.2 -2.0 -1.2 -2.0 -1.0 -1.3 -0.5 Note: Values for cpe,1 are intended for the design of small elements and fixings with an element of 1m2 or less such as cladding elements and roofing elements. Values for cpe,10 may be used for the design of the overall load bearing structure of buildings. The external pressure coeffiecient cpe,1 and cpe,10 is using for loadaded area of 1m2 and 10m2 respectively. EXTERNAL WIND PRESSURE/FORCE ON MONOPITCH ROOF Pressure on surface &Wind force (EN1991-1-4, Eq. 5.1&5.5) we=qp(ze).(cpe +cpi) & Fw=cscd·Σwe·Aref
  • 15. Recommended values of external pressure coefficients for duopitch roofs (EN1991-1-4,Tab. 7.4a) Pitch Angle a Zone for wind direction θ=0o F G H I J cpe,10 cpe,1 cpe,10 cpe,10 cpe,1 cpe,10 cpe,10 cpe,1 cpe,10 cpe,1 -45o -0.6 -0.6 -0.8 -0.7 -1.0 -1.5 -30o -1.1 -2.0 -0.8 -1.5 -0.8 -0.6 -0.8 -1.4 -15 o -2.5 -2.8 -1.3 -2.0 -0.8 -1.2 -0.5 -0.7 -1.2 -5 o -2.3 -2.5 -1.2 -2.0 -0.8 -1.2 +0.2 +0.2 -0.6 -0.6 5 o -1.7 -2.5 -1.2 -2.0 -0.6 -1.2 -0.6 +0.2 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 -0.6 15 o -0.9 -2.0 -0.8 -1.5 -0.3 -0.4 -1.0 -1.5 +0.2 +0.2 +0.2 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 30 o -0.5 -1.5 -0.5 -1.5 -0.2 -0.4 -0.5 +0.7 +0.7 +0.4 +0.0 +0.0 45 o -0.0 -0.0 -0.0 -0.2 -0.3 +0.7 +0.7 +0.6 +0.0 +0.0 60 o +0.7 +0.7 +0.7 -0.2 -0.3 75 o +0.8 +0.8 +0.8 -0.2 -0.3 Recommended values of external pressure coefficients for duopitch roofs (EN1991-1-4,Tab. 7.4b) Pitch Angle a Zone for wind direction θ=90o F G H I cpe,10 cpe,1 cpe,10 cpe,10 cpe,1 cpe,10 cpe,10 cpe,1 -45o -1.4 -2.0 -1.2 -2.0 -1.0 -1.3 -0.9 -1.2 -30o -1.5 -2.1 -1.2 -2.0 -1.0 -1.3 -0.9 -1.2 -15o -1.9 -2.5 -1.2 -2.0 -0.8 -1.2 -0.8 -1.2 -5o -1.8 -2.5 -1.2 -2.0 -0.7 -1.2 -0.6 -1.2 5o -1.6 -2.2 -1.2 -2.0 -0.7 -1.2 -0.6 15o -1.3 -2.0 -1.2 -2.0 -0.6 -1.2 -0.5 30o -1.1 -1.5 -1.4 -2.0 -0.8 -1.2 -0.5 45o -1.1 -1.5 -1.4 -2.0 -0.9 -1.2 -0.5 60o -1.1 -1.5 -1.4 -2.0 -0.8 -1.2 -0.5 75o -1.1 -1.5 -1.4 -2.0 -0.8 -1.2 -0.5 EXTERNAL WIND PRESSURE/FORCE ON DUOPITCH ROOF Pressure on surface &Wind force (EN1991-1-4, Eq. 5.1&5.5) we=qp(ze).(cpe +cpi) & Fw=cscd·Σwe·Aref