The document provides guidance on establishing a Joint Quality Committee between acute care hospitals and skilled nursing facilities/long-term acute care hospitals to improve quality outcomes and care transitions, with steps including engaging leadership, establishing shared quality metrics and goals, collaboratively reviewing performance data, and ensuring open communication between organizations.
2. Speakers & Panel
Speakers Panel
• Michael Felver MD • Shelly Szarek-Skodny LNHA
• Seth Vilensky MBA • David Johnson, MBA
• Leslie Vajner RN MHA • Dan Blechschmid, LNHA
Disclosures
• All Speakers & Panel Members have no Financial Disclosures to Reveal/Present
• Cleveland Clinic and Kindred have no financial relationship.
• Both Cleveland Clinic & Kindred have developed these types of relationships with other
providers. This presentation highlights one example of an integrated care model.
2
3. Learning Objectives
• Review the healthcare reform and the impact on traditional
organization and level of care relationships
• Describe a model for partnering between the hospital and SNF focusing
on quality outcomes, transparency and successful transition of clinical
care.
• Provide the guide to create your own Joint Quality Committee.
• Share the “foundational” components that will generate meaningful
dialog between the partnering organizations.
3
4. Discussion Agenda
Driving Forces & Market Overview
Joint Quality Committee…Getting Started
Monitoring Quality and Performance Indicators
Collaborative Process Improvement
Return to Acute Care
Timeline & Accomplishments- Key Lessons Learned
Joint Quality Committees in Multiple Settings
5 Steps to Starting Your Own Joint Quality Committee
Panel Discussion
4
5. Tremendous Opportunities Exist to Better Manage
Patient Care for Patients Discharged to Post-Acute
Medicare Patients’ Use of Post-Acute Services Throughout an “Episode of Care” (1)
Higher Intensity of Service Lower
SHORT-TERM LONG-TERM SKILLED HOME
INPATIENT OUTPATIENT
ACUTE CARE ACUTE CARE NURSING HEALTH
REHAB REHAB
HOSPITALS HOSPITALS FACILITIES CARE
Patients’ first site of
discharge after acute 2% 10% 41% 9% 37%
care hospital stay
Patients’ use of site
during a 90 day episode 2% 11% 52% 21% 61%
35% of Medicare beneficiaries are discharged
from acute hospitals to post-acute care
(1)
Source: RTI, 2009: Examining Post Acute Care Relationships in an Integrated Hospital System
5
6. The Cleveland Clinic & Kindred Healthcare
in Northeast Ohio
Cleveland Clinic Foundation Kindred Hospital Fairhill and Co-Located Hospital-Based SNF
1,300 beds located at the Cleveland Located approximately one mile from the Cleveland
Clinic Main campus Clinic
Regarded as one of the top 4 hospitals 68 Bed LTACH with 6 Special Care Beds
in the United States 40 co-located Sub Acute SNF Beds
System comprised of its main campus Over 85% of Fairhill’s nearly 1,000 annual admissions
and eight regional hospitals in come from 5 nearby hospitals, with 65% from the
Northeast Ohio (4,400 total beds) Cleveland Clinic
Employs more than 2,700 salaried Kindred also has the Gateway Long-term Acute care
physicians and scientists Hospital, 3 Transitional Care Nursing Centers, and 2
Owns home health service line and IRF Assisted Living Facility in the Cleveland Market
Highest acuity hospital in the country
6
8. Driving Forces: SNF Concentration - CC + Regional Hospitals
Cleveland Clinic Sentn= 22,735 placements in 2010 in 2010
Patients providersSNFs
860 unique >800
100%
860 Facilities in Total
90%
150 Facilities make
Cumulative % of SNF Placement Volume
up 90%of activity
80%
80 Facilities make
70% up 80%of activity
60%
40 Facilities make
up 60%of activity
50%
40%
30%
20%
CCHS SNFs make up
~10% of activity
10%
0%
6
6
6
6
1
1
1
6
1
1
6
1
6
1
1
6
1
1
6
1
6
1
1
6
1
6
1
6
6
1
6
1
51
26
76
10
12
15
17
20
25
27
32
42
45
52
57
60
67
70
72
75
77
82
85
22
30
35
37
40
47
50
55
62
65
80
SNF Facilities
(1)
Source: Cleveland Clinic Health System internal data
8
9. Nursing Home Reimbursement Outlook for 2012
Medicaid:
The outlook for 2012 is extremely
bleak. According to Kaiser Survey, Combined Medicare/Medicaid Shortfall for 2012
42 states face budget deficits,
Payer 2012 Days in Margin/ Net margin/
collectively totaling 103 billion at Avg. million Shortfall % Shortfall
the start of 2012. rate s revenue in billions
Medicare $457.59 67.4 18.10% $5.58
Medicare: Medicaid $176.49 322.9 -14.00% ($7.96)
A combined shortfall for 2012 Net shortfall ($2.38)
taking into account Oct. 1, 2011
reduction in Part A to SNF’s of 3.87
billion or 11.1%.
Sources: MedPAC report to congress Medicare Payment Policy, AHCA Reimbursement and Research Department SNF PPS Model
based upon FY 2012 Medicare Rates and SNF claim data, A Report on Shortfall in Medicaid Funding for Nursing Home Care,
ELJAY, LLC December 2011.
9
10. Driving Forces
Value Based Purchasing Episode-based / Bundled payment
Readmission Penalties pilots
Look back period began October, Released on August 23, 2011
2011 Four Models to Propose
Initial focus on CHF, AMI, Eligible Awardees: Hospitals,
Pneumonia Physician Groups, Post-Acute
Targeted DRG reduced by Providers
adjustment factor based on Applicants have significant latitude
readmissions deemed “excessive” to propose:
or above the national average Length of Episode
Will allow for a 1%- 2% reduction in Clinical conditions targeted and
total Medicare Payments to services included
Hospitals– 2013 – 2017
Expected discount provided to
Projected $7.1B in reduced
Medicare
payments (2013 – 2019)
Quality metrics will be developed to
track results
10
11. Driving Forces:
The Affordable Care Act - Implementation Timeline
2012 2013 2014
• Hospital Value-Based • Improving Preventive Health • No Discrimination Due to Pre-Existing
Purchasing program (VBP). Coverage to expand the Conditions or Gender.
Financial incentives to number of Americans • Eliminating Annual Limits on
hospitals to improve the receiving preventive care. Insurance Coverage.
quality of care. • Expanded Authority to • Ensuring Coverage for Individuals
Bundle Payments; a national Participating in Clinical Trials.
• Encouraging Integrated pilot program to encourage
Health Systems. Incentives • Improving Quality and Lowering
hospitals, doctors, and other Costs: tax credits to make it easier for
for physicians to form providers to work together the middle class to afford insurance.
"Accountable Care to improve the coordination
and quality of patient care. • Establishing Health Insurance
Organizations”.
• Increasing Medicaid Exchanges to easily shop for more
• Reducing Paperwork and affordable private insurance.
Administrative Costs Payments for Primary Care
Doctors. • Small Business Tax Credit.
through Electronic Health • Increasing Access to Medicaid.
Records. • Additional Funding for the
Children's Health Insurance • Promoting Individual Responsibility;
• Understanding and Fighting Program individuals who can afford it will be
Health Disparities. required to obtain basic health
• Providing New, Voluntary insurance coverage
Options for Long-Term Care
Insurance.
Source: http://www.whitehouse.gov/healthreform/timeline
11
12. Why Are These Relationships So Important?
Complicated Healthcare Environment
Lack of Continuity between Care Site & Provider Office
Lack of Clinician Communication
CMS Payment Penalties for Re-Hospitalization
Pending Healthcare Reform – “What will really happen?”
Changing Environment Changing Strategy
• Health Reform, PPACA • Hospitals reducing SNF capacity
• Episode-based Bundled Payments • Emerging pilots of Post-Acute partnership
across the country in many structural
• Readmission Penalties
variations
• Continuing Care Hospital demonstration
• IT as “enabler”
• Public Quality Metrics
12
13. Discussion Agenda
Driving Forces & Market Overview
Joint Quality Committee…Getting Started
Monitoring Quality and Performance Indicators
Collaborative Process Improvement
Return to Acute Care
Timeline & Accomplishments- Key Lessons Learned
Joint Quality Committees in Multiple Settings
5 Steps to Starting Your Own Joint Quality Committee
Panel Discussion
13
14. You Can Develop These Relationships in Your Market
Disclaimer…
The Cleveland Clinic & Kindred are:
• Large Organizations
• With Corporate Resources and
• Focus on information technology infrastructure
These Relationships DON’T Need ANY of the Above!
What you do need:
• The willingness to take on this type of partnership
• A commitment to patient outcomes and care across the continuum
• Short term commitment (time, resources) for a long term benefit
14
15. Establishing a Joint Quality Committee
Leadership Physician Complementary Tracked & Robust
Engagement & Engagement & Clinical Transparent Communication
Commitment Alignment Capabilities Outcomes Protocols
Establish mutual Educate key Identify key needs of Establish shared IT Linkages
objectives physicians and hospital quality and Education of all key
Articulate Goals & obtain buy-in Focus on clinical operating measures
constituents on
Objectives in Invest in physicians outcome and quality Build dashboard collaborative
charter with leadership roles indicators Establish baseline Formation of Joint
Identify and Establish mutual Identify parallel performance Quality Committee with
empower key privileges and competencies to measures monthly meetings
leaders on both education on post- establish in post- Set targets Review dashboard of
sides acute setting (billing, acute partner
Track and trend clinical and operating
Initial focus on utilization, etc.) Implement post- data metrics
high impact Engage physicians in acute staff training
Celebrate Establish change of
outcomes (e.g., re- post-acute staff and competency
milestones condition
hospitalizations) training and validation protocols communication
Longer term goals establishing Avoid temptation to protocols
(eg, participate in communication
discuss referral Establish patient
CMS ACO demos) protocols
patterns and volume transitions protocols
Review Foster integration of that does not have a related to quality/safety
relationship/ physicians across quality component
affiliations Transparency is KEY
charter with your
legal counsel
Source: Advisory Board interviews and analysis.
15
16. Getting Started: Aligned and Clearly Articulated Goals
• Develop and enforce processes, procedures, and workflow that
contributes to high-quality and efficiency
• Provide a forum for sharing clinical quality data and improvement plans
• Address day-to-day issues including: admissions, nursing, therapy, IT,
physician relations, ancillary services, etc.
• Discuss medical staff privileges/faculty and training of physicians
(fellows and residents)
• Communicate other corporate-level initiatives and changes that may
impact the project
16
18. Getting Started: Meeting Structure
• Meeting Times & Locations
• Standing monthly meetings
• Ad-hoc meetings / conference calls can be called by chairs at any
time to solve immediate issues
Proposed Standing Agenda
• Facilitator, Agenda, Minutes
• Successes –milestones achieved, things
that went well
• Assigned Deliverables • Monthly Quality Scorecard Review
• Review list of key challenges
• Special Projects
• Action Items – team to identify specific
actions that need to happen and who is
responsible
18
19. Getting Started
Understand & Align Culture Troubleshooting
• Understand Current Clinical Candidly Discuss
Competency
Issues & Concerns ASAP!
• Optimize patient transfers between
• Attendance and Participant
levels of care
Engagement
• Share of Drug Formularies & • Quality & Customer Service
Pharmacy contacts Performance
• Use of Referral Source for • Pertinent Data/Outcome Review
Continued Care (appointments & • Incomplete Data
urgent care)
• Need for Deeper Analysis
• Collaborate on Special Patient • All members need to avoid
Population defensiveness or excuses when issues
arise- focus on the patient &
outcomes
19
20. Discussion Agenda
Driving Forces & Market Overview
Joint Quality Committee…Getting Started
Monitoring Quality and Performance Indicators
Collaborative Process Improvement
Return to Acute Care
Timeline & Accomplishments- Key Lessons Learned
Joint Quality Committees in Multiple Settings
5 Steps to Starting Your Own Joint Quality Committee
Panel Discussion
20
22. Getting Started:
Jointly Established Quality Goals & Benchmarks
Nosocomial Pressure Wounds
Definitions in Acute Care Match
Definitions in Post Acute Care
Inclusion Process Completed for All
• Numerator:
• New nosocomial (developed after Day 3 of admission) Reported Data
• Stage II or higher Pressure wound(s). Pressure wounds with eschar will be considered Stage II or higher for these
purposes.
• Follow guidelines for identifying and documenting “unstageable” wounds such as Deep Tissue Injuries (DTI).
• Include applicable DTIs once the wound becomes stageable. If a Stage I advances to Stage II or higher, count as a
new pressure wound.
• Numerator EXCLUDES: Wounds that develop within the first 3 days after admission, skin tears, surgical wounds,
rashes, or any non-pressure related wounds.
•Denominator
• Every patient contributes every day of stay to the denominator.
Jointly Determined Quality
Exclusions Performance Target
No exclusion for hospice, pre-death condition, non-compliance, etc.
Rate of 3.0/1,000 patient days
22
23. Getting Started:
Jointly Established Quality Goals & Benchmarks
Partner Specific Data
• Breaking out data can be cumbersome!
• Must understand current information systems
• Have dedicated resource/time to parse information
Suggested Partner Specific Data
• Administrative
•Admission/Discharges
•Length of Stay
• Outcomes
•Discharge Disposition
•Return to Acute Care
23
24. Year Over Year Statistics
Cleveland Clinic Physician Group
Admissions for Kindred Facilities
# of Patient Admits
1,000 957
900
800
700 675 527 LTAC
600
262
500
400
300
383 SAU
200 413
100 63
63 47 Greens TCU
0
2009 2010 2011
24
25. Collaborative Process Improvement: Case Study
Kindred LTAC Patient Satisfaction
Would You Recommend Kindred
to a Friend or Family Member?
10.0
9.5
9.0
8.5
8.0
7.5
7.0
6.5
6.0
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Cleveland Clinic 2010 2011
Kindred Health Care
• High expectations & monitoring • Historical monitoring without large
of patient experience change in performance
• Feedback of Patient Experience • Use of Cleveland Clinic best practice
resulted in increased scrutiny due from Office of Patient Experience
to Kindred relationship
* Process Improvement Includes:
Collaborative process improvement initiatives
Use of Administrative Rounding Program; daily visit by leadership team
Implementation of Hourly Rounding, flexible visitation policy
Efforts to understand patient/family needs prior to Kindred Admission
Streamlined communication of issue or concern with swift resolution
25
27. Getting Started: Collaborative Process Improvement
Kindred Subacute Unit:
Return to Acute Care
40.0%
30.0%
20.0%
10.0%
0.0%
27
28. Return to Acute Care: Contributing Factors
Complex Discussion in the Post-Acute Care Setting
• Physician involvement and availability
• Diagnostic testing availability
• Nursing assessment skills
• Clinical competencies of staff
• Nurse / physician communication and understanding
• Advance Directives, Surrogate Decision making, End-of-Life planning
• Family expectations
• Transition issues – accurate transfer data and medical info, continuity
of care
28
29. Detailed Review of Each Return to Hospital Case
Length of Stay
Time of Discharge (day of week, time of day)
Attending physician
Physician ordering transfer
Findings and intervention at facility
Findings and interventions at acute care hospital*
Evaluate if re-admission is Appropriate, Potentially Avoidable,
Avoidable
Extenuating circumstances or other pressures impacting decision to
transfer
Availability/timeliness of services, clinical assessment/intervention,
psycho-social or family pressures, etc.
29
30. Data Management & Analysis
Deeper Understanding of Performance
• Volume of patients
• Length of Stay
• Indicator of acuity
Physician • Discharge Disposition
Performance • Patients to lower level of care
• Return to Acute Care
• Mortality
• Medical Records compliance
Monthly • Highlight areas of pride & areas where process
improvement initiatives are required
Scorecards
• Monitor consistency of performance over time
Control Charts • Track impact of process improvement initiatives
30
31. Discussion Agenda
Driving Forces & Market Overview
Joint Quality Committee…Getting Started
Monitoring Quality and Performance Indicators
Collaborative Process Improvement
Return to Acute Care
Timeline & Accomplishments- Key Lessons Learned
Joint Quality Committees in Multiple Settings
5 Steps to Starting Your Own Joint Quality Committee
Panel Discussion
31
32. Kindred - Cleveland Clinic Relationship
Timeline & Accomplishments
2009 2010 2011
• Monthly Joint Quality Committee • Collaborative process • Initiation of the Cleveland Clinic –
Information • Full-time Dedicated project
management
improvement initiatives
resulting in better
Kindred “Futures” Committee
• Interface for physician notes from
Sharing • Information technology
infrastructure in place
performance
EPIC to ProTouch goes live which
insures truly integrated care
• Relationship expands to “The Greens”
• Developed methodology to • 675 patients cared for under free-standing Transitional Care Center
Care determine examine and act this model of care.
on avoidable return to • Kindred Fairhill SAU & The Greens
Transitions acute care admit first patients to the “Heart Care
to Home” program
• Cleveland Clinic physician • Kindred Fairhill begins as an • Dr. Michael Felver Medical Dir. of
Physician coverage for both LTAC &
SubAcute level of care
academic site for Cleveland
Clinic residents & medical
Transitional Care Unit
• Caregiver group expands 100% to
Engagement • Cleveland Clinic physician
offices at Kindred Fairhill LTAC
students
include more internists, specialists &
mid-level providers
• Review of quality indicators, • Patient outcomes managed • Continued improvement in quality and
Quality & definitions and calculations by the Cleveland Clinic performance indicators
physician group reviewed • Collaborative, inter-organizational
Outcomes separately process improvement
Kindred Fairhill + Kindred’s The Greens
32
33. Key Lessons Learned
“Focus Locally, Succeed Locally”
Merge culture through candid conversations and operational/clinical subgroups
Information Information Technology projects require aligned priorities
Sharing Enhanced information sharing requires understanding/comfort of compliance and
legal
Understand current clinical competency and manage gaps
Care Utilize experts to enhance knowledge and skill for highly acute/specialty patient
populations
Transitions Access to patient historic information is a key enabler for smooth transitions of care,
though more exchange of information is needed to improve patient outcomes
Dedicated and engaged physician leadership is cornerstone to relationship success
Physician Physician engagement and communication strengthened with use of EPIC/physicians
on-site
Engagement
Lack of key specialists directly impacts readmission rates
Quality & outcome measures, including definitions, must be measured consistently
Quality & Strong working relationships & the ability to communicate candidly can overcome
barriers and speed issue resolution
Outcomes
Focus on key quality outcomes can help contribute to success
Italicized font depicts areas of continued focus
33
34. Highlighted Benefits
Increased rigor around quality data collection and reporting
Relationship may open up opportunities for your staff:
Participate in hospital training
Hospital sponsored community outreach events, task forces, or
process improvement committees
Facility name recognition among hospital staff without added
marketing expense
Immediate feedback on complaints that otherwise facility would be
unaware
Insight into strategic plans, initiatives and programs of the
hospital/referral source; ability to better facilitate collaborative growth
34
35. Discussion Agenda
Driving Forces & Market Overview
Joint Quality Committee…Getting Started
Monitoring Quality and Performance Indicators
Collaborative Process Improvement
Return to Acute Care
Timeline & Accomplishments- Key Lessons Learned
Joint Quality Committees in Multiple Settings
5 Steps to Starting Your Own Joint Quality Committee
Panel Discussion
35
36. Joint Quality Committees in Multiple Settings
Variations on a Theme
• Post Acute LTACH - Post Acute SNF
• Post Acute (SNF/LTACH) - Home Care
• Payors - Facilities
• Physician Practices - Facilities
36
37. Variations on a Theme: Expanding the Relationship
Kindred The Greens & Expanding the Relationship
Hillcrest Hospital with Specialty Services
• Top referring hospital within 2 miles • International Services
• 32% of patients admitted to Green’s
from Hillcrest
• Home Care- enhanced post
• Initiating JQC in 2012
acute linkages
• Specialty Programs: Orthopedic,
Cardiac and Pulmonary patients
• Physician Overlap: Pulmonologist and • Research Initiatives
Orthopedic surgeon from Hillcrest
round on patients. • Clinical Programs
• Hillcrest’s Lab, Infusion Therapy and
Emergency Services support care at the
Greens
37
38. Discussion Agenda
Driving Forces & Market Overview
Joint Quality Committee…Getting Started
Monitoring Quality and Performance Indicators
Collaborative Process Improvement
Return to Acute Care
Timeline & Accomplishments- Key Lessons Learned
Joint Quality Committees in Multiple Settings
5 Steps to Starting Your Own Joint Quality Committee
Panel Discussion
38
39. 5 Steps to Starting Your Own Joint Quality Committee
1. Make Phone Calls: Physician to Physician Relationship will Facilitate
the Start Up
2. Focus on QUALITY
3. Commit to monitoring partner specific data
4. Initial Meetings MUST be VALUABLE
• Monthly (to develop the relationship)
• Use participants time wisely
• Delver on ALL promises/To-Do items
5. Address Concerns, Issues and Cultural Differences ASAP!
• Be Open, Candid & Transparent
39
40. Talking Points for First Meeting
Highlight the Benefit of Partnering
Reduced length of stay
Ability to monitor shared patients outcomes
Venue to impact hand-off and other quality indicators
Commit resources to relationship development
Jointly identified indicators to measure and monitor
Ability to report statistics specific to Partner Organization
Transparency, Transparency, Transparency
Collaborative Process Improvement
One point of contact for questions, ideas and issue resolution
• Specialty Programs
Highlight • Location & Highlights of Physical Plant
Your • Physician credentialing overlap
• 5-Star Rating & Survey Results
Facility • Leadership & Staff Consistency
40
41. Discussion Agenda
Driving Forces & Market Overview
Joint Quality Committee…Getting Started
Monitoring Quality and Performance Indicators
Collaborative Process Improvement
Return to Acute Care
Timeline & Accomplishments- Key Lessons Learned
Joint Quality Committees in Multiple Settings
5 Steps to Starting Your Own Joint Quality Committee
Panel Discussion
41
This is a complicated system with communication breakdown. CMS is recognizing the inefficiencies and ineffective care offered on Medicare patients with chronic conditions that “ping-pong” in/out of the hospital and ERs. Thus the opportunity is to come together and create local market communication channels and processes that solve the problems of “silo” care. Although we do not fully understand how healthcare reform will impact us as physicians and clinicians, one thing is for certain: To be included in future demonstrations and ACOs , we need to demonstrate we have contributed to the solutions. Many of these solutions will focus on providing better chronic care in lower acuity care sites.
Felver…only 6% of this groups volume is outside of the Main campus (CC regional facilities) Subacute LOS variance…. 2010 ALOS - 23.2------Referral volume - 548 2011 ALOS – 25.1-----Referral volume - 561
MedPAC and CMS will be measuring post-acute facilities on their ability to reduce unnecessary re-admissions. Although many factors can contribute to these re-hospitalizations, we ask for you to notify our Dir of Nsg Services or Exec Director (Note: say Executive Director” and do not use acronym) if you see any of these barriers we can improve upon. We are looking for your expertise to help us.
Relationship spans almost 2 years. 955 patients cared for under this model through May 2011
Relationship spans almost 2 years. 955 patients cared for under this model through May 2011