SlideShare une entreprise Scribd logo
1  sur  3
Krista Port




STATE OF MINNESOTA                                                                DISTRICT COURT

COUNTY OF HENNEPIN                                                 FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
                                                                            CASE TYPE: WRD

Carole Burns, trustee for the next of )
kin of Edmund Burns, decedent, and    )
Carol Burns, individually,            )
                                      )
                      Plaintiffs,     )
                                      )
vs.                                   )                            ANSWER AND CROSS CLAIM
                                      )
Harry’s Cement Mix, Inc., a Minnesota )
Corporation, and Clifford Marcus,     )
                                      )                            Court File No. 00-276
                      Defendants.     )

        Defendant Clifford Marcus, for his answer to the Complaint of the Plaintiffs herein, states

as follows:

                                                   I.

        He admits paragraphs I, II, III, V, and IX of Plaintiffs’ Complaint.

                                                  II.

        He denies paragraph IV of Plaintiffs’ Complaint.

                                                  III.

        He denies that he was negligent as alleged in paragraph VI of said Complaint.

                                                  IV.

        He is without sufficient information to form a belief as to the truth or falsity of Plaintiffs’

allegation as to Plaintiff Edmund Burns being injured as found in paragraph VI, and puts

Plaintiffs’ to their proof thereof.
V.

       He is without sufficient information to form a belief as to the truth or falsity of

paragraphs VII, VIII, IX, and X and puts Plaintiffs to their proof thereof; and further states that

in the event Plaintiffs suffered damages as alleged, such damages were the result of the

negligence of Plaintiff Edmund Burns.

                                                  VI.

       Except as admitted or otherwise qualified herein, Defendant Clifford Marcus denies each

and every allegation in said Complaint contained.

                                          CROSS CLAIM

       Defendant Clifford Marcus, for his cross claim against Harry’s Cement Mix Inc., states

and alleges as follows:

                                                   I.

       That at the time and place referred to in Plaintiffs’ Complaint, this answering Defendant

was in the course and scope of his employment with Defendant, Harry’s Cement Mix, Inc., and

as a result of his employment, he is entitled to indemnity and/or contribution for the payment of

any damages adjourned against him on behalf of Plaintiffs from Defendant, Harry’s Cement Mix

Inc.

       WHEREFORE, Defendant Clifford Marcus prays for judgment as follows:

   1. Dismissing the Complaint of the Plaintiffs against this answering defendant.




                                                   2
                                           D:ConFacconversion16825506answercrossclaim-130228021223-phpapp01.docx
2. In the event Plaintiffs are awarded judgment against this answering Defendant, he is
      entitled to judgment against Defendant, Harry’s Cement Mix, Inc., for indemnity and/or
      contribution thereof.

   3. For such other and further relief as to the Court may deem just and equitable.

                                                        STEPHENS, BOWEN & JANSEN


                                                        ____________________________________
                                                        Mavis M. Pattee
                                                        Attorney for Plaintiff
                                                        1601 Jefferson Street
                                                        Alexandria, MN 56308
                                                        Tele: (320) 762-4516
                                                        Atty. Reg. No. 77-7777

STATE OF MINNESOTA            )
                              ) SS
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN            )

        Clifford Marcus, being duly sworn, deposes and states that he is the defendant and the
cross claimant in the above entitled action, that he has read the foregoing answer and cross claim,
and that every statement contained therein is within his personal knowledge and is true and
correct.

                                                        ____________________________________
                                                        Clifford Marcus

       Subscribed and sworn to before me this 14th day of February 2012.


                                                        ____________________________________
                                                        Notary Public

       The party(ies) upon whose behalf this pleading is submitted, by and through the
undersigned, hereby acknowledge(s) that sanctions may be imposed for a violation of Minn. Stat.
Section 549.211.

                                                        ____________________________________
                                                        Mavis M. Pattee
                                                        Attorney for Defendant Clifford Marcus



                                                  3
                                          D:ConFacconversion16825506answercrossclaim-130228021223-phpapp01.docx

Contenu connexe

Tendances

Sample california demurrer to fraud complaint
Sample california demurrer to fraud complaintSample california demurrer to fraud complaint
Sample california demurrer to fraud complaintLegalDocsPro
 
Donatio Mortis Causa
Donatio Mortis CausaDonatio Mortis Causa
Donatio Mortis CausaSnj SNj
 
Sample motion for consolidation of cases in California
Sample motion for consolidation of cases in CaliforniaSample motion for consolidation of cases in California
Sample motion for consolidation of cases in CaliforniaLegalDocsPro
 
Brown Opposition To Plaintiff Motion To Amend Complaint
Brown Opposition To Plaintiff Motion To Amend ComplaintBrown Opposition To Plaintiff Motion To Amend Complaint
Brown Opposition To Plaintiff Motion To Amend ComplaintJRachelle
 
Answer & counterclaim for ms. geiger
Answer & counterclaim for ms. geigerAnswer & counterclaim for ms. geiger
Answer & counterclaim for ms. geigerChris Harden
 
Sample opposition to motion for new trial in United States District Court
Sample opposition to motion for new trial in United States District CourtSample opposition to motion for new trial in United States District Court
Sample opposition to motion for new trial in United States District CourtLegalDocsPro
 
Sample verified complaint for financial elder abuse in California
Sample verified complaint for financial elder abuse in CaliforniaSample verified complaint for financial elder abuse in California
Sample verified complaint for financial elder abuse in CaliforniaLegalDocsPro
 
This Is Reno’s second public records lawsuit against the City of Reno and Ren...
This Is Reno’s second public records lawsuit against the City of Reno and Ren...This Is Reno’s second public records lawsuit against the City of Reno and Ren...
This Is Reno’s second public records lawsuit against the City of Reno and Ren...This Is Reno
 
Sample California motion for attorney fees after judgment
Sample California motion for attorney fees after judgmentSample California motion for attorney fees after judgment
Sample California motion for attorney fees after judgmentLegalDocsPro
 
Sample stipulations and orders for california
Sample stipulations and orders for californiaSample stipulations and orders for california
Sample stipulations and orders for californiaLegalDocsPro
 
Sample motion to compel deposition subpoena in california
Sample motion to compel deposition subpoena in californiaSample motion to compel deposition subpoena in california
Sample motion to compel deposition subpoena in californiaLegalDocsPro
 
California Heggstad 850 Probate Petition Sacramento
California Heggstad 850 Probate Petition SacramentoCalifornia Heggstad 850 Probate Petition Sacramento
California Heggstad 850 Probate Petition SacramentoMark Hackard
 
Motion to change venue
Motion to change venueMotion to change venue
Motion to change venueLegal Remedy
 
Sample interoffice memorandum
Sample interoffice memorandumSample interoffice memorandum
Sample interoffice memorandumJohn Vaughn, CMI
 
Sample California motion for protective order regarding interrogatories
Sample California motion for protective order regarding interrogatories Sample California motion for protective order regarding interrogatories
Sample California motion for protective order regarding interrogatories LegalDocsPro
 
Sample motion to strike alter ego allegations in california
Sample motion to strike alter ego allegations in californiaSample motion to strike alter ego allegations in california
Sample motion to strike alter ego allegations in californiaLegalDocsPro
 
Sample motion for order compelling satisfaction of judgment in California
Sample motion for order compelling satisfaction of judgment in CaliforniaSample motion for order compelling satisfaction of judgment in California
Sample motion for order compelling satisfaction of judgment in CaliforniaLegalDocsPro
 
Motion for Preliminary Injunction
Motion for Preliminary InjunctionMotion for Preliminary Injunction
Motion for Preliminary Injunctionawc166
 
Secret trust
Secret trustSecret trust
Secret trustFAROUQ
 

Tendances (20)

Sample california demurrer to fraud complaint
Sample california demurrer to fraud complaintSample california demurrer to fraud complaint
Sample california demurrer to fraud complaint
 
Donatio Mortis Causa
Donatio Mortis CausaDonatio Mortis Causa
Donatio Mortis Causa
 
Sample motion for consolidation of cases in California
Sample motion for consolidation of cases in CaliforniaSample motion for consolidation of cases in California
Sample motion for consolidation of cases in California
 
Brown Opposition To Plaintiff Motion To Amend Complaint
Brown Opposition To Plaintiff Motion To Amend ComplaintBrown Opposition To Plaintiff Motion To Amend Complaint
Brown Opposition To Plaintiff Motion To Amend Complaint
 
Answer & counterclaim for ms. geiger
Answer & counterclaim for ms. geigerAnswer & counterclaim for ms. geiger
Answer & counterclaim for ms. geiger
 
Sample opposition to motion for new trial in United States District Court
Sample opposition to motion for new trial in United States District CourtSample opposition to motion for new trial in United States District Court
Sample opposition to motion for new trial in United States District Court
 
Sample verified complaint for financial elder abuse in California
Sample verified complaint for financial elder abuse in CaliforniaSample verified complaint for financial elder abuse in California
Sample verified complaint for financial elder abuse in California
 
This Is Reno’s second public records lawsuit against the City of Reno and Ren...
This Is Reno’s second public records lawsuit against the City of Reno and Ren...This Is Reno’s second public records lawsuit against the City of Reno and Ren...
This Is Reno’s second public records lawsuit against the City of Reno and Ren...
 
Sample California motion for attorney fees after judgment
Sample California motion for attorney fees after judgmentSample California motion for attorney fees after judgment
Sample California motion for attorney fees after judgment
 
Sample stipulations and orders for california
Sample stipulations and orders for californiaSample stipulations and orders for california
Sample stipulations and orders for california
 
Sample motion to compel deposition subpoena in california
Sample motion to compel deposition subpoena in californiaSample motion to compel deposition subpoena in california
Sample motion to compel deposition subpoena in california
 
California Heggstad 850 Probate Petition Sacramento
California Heggstad 850 Probate Petition SacramentoCalifornia Heggstad 850 Probate Petition Sacramento
California Heggstad 850 Probate Petition Sacramento
 
Motion to change venue
Motion to change venueMotion to change venue
Motion to change venue
 
Sample interoffice memorandum
Sample interoffice memorandumSample interoffice memorandum
Sample interoffice memorandum
 
Sample California motion for protective order regarding interrogatories
Sample California motion for protective order regarding interrogatories Sample California motion for protective order regarding interrogatories
Sample California motion for protective order regarding interrogatories
 
Sample motion to strike alter ego allegations in california
Sample motion to strike alter ego allegations in californiaSample motion to strike alter ego allegations in california
Sample motion to strike alter ego allegations in california
 
Sample motion for order compelling satisfaction of judgment in California
Sample motion for order compelling satisfaction of judgment in CaliforniaSample motion for order compelling satisfaction of judgment in California
Sample motion for order compelling satisfaction of judgment in California
 
Expert witness disclosure
Expert witness disclosureExpert witness disclosure
Expert witness disclosure
 
Motion for Preliminary Injunction
Motion for Preliminary InjunctionMotion for Preliminary Injunction
Motion for Preliminary Injunction
 
Secret trust
Secret trustSecret trust
Secret trust
 

Similaire à Answer cross claim

Similaire à Answer cross claim (20)

Complaint project 3
Complaint project 3Complaint project 3
Complaint project 3
 
Granite Rose Motion to Dismiss
Granite Rose Motion to DismissGranite Rose Motion to Dismiss
Granite Rose Motion to Dismiss
 
Production test complaint
Production test complaintProduction test complaint
Production test complaint
 
Answer project 1
Answer project 1Answer project 1
Answer project 1
 
Doc. 119
Doc. 119Doc. 119
Doc. 119
 
Doc. 119
Doc. 119Doc. 119
Doc. 119
 
Summons project 3
Summons project 3Summons project 3
Summons project 3
 
Answer of complaint 400 cv-2016 and 401-cv-2016 and counterclaim final
Answer of complaint 400 cv-2016 and 401-cv-2016 and counterclaim finalAnswer of complaint 400 cv-2016 and 401-cv-2016 and counterclaim final
Answer of complaint 400 cv-2016 and 401-cv-2016 and counterclaim final
 
Stern motion for stay of mandate
Stern   motion for stay of mandateStern   motion for stay of mandate
Stern motion for stay of mandate
 
Doc 94
Doc 94Doc 94
Doc 94
 
Document 94
Document 94Document 94
Document 94
 
Doc 94
Doc 94Doc 94
Doc 94
 
Document 94
Document 94Document 94
Document 94
 
Document 94
Document 94Document 94
Document 94
 
Carrie Schultz-Loch Project 8-3
Carrie Schultz-Loch Project 8-3Carrie Schultz-Loch Project 8-3
Carrie Schultz-Loch Project 8-3
 
Exhibits to the Motion to Add 200 New Plaintiffs to Armando Montelongo RICO L...
Exhibits to the Motion to Add 200 New Plaintiffs to Armando Montelongo RICO L...Exhibits to the Motion to Add 200 New Plaintiffs to Armando Montelongo RICO L...
Exhibits to the Motion to Add 200 New Plaintiffs to Armando Montelongo RICO L...
 
177282932 huyssen-vs-gutierez
177282932 huyssen-vs-gutierez177282932 huyssen-vs-gutierez
177282932 huyssen-vs-gutierez
 
WritingSample
WritingSampleWritingSample
WritingSample
 
Doc.126
Doc.126Doc.126
Doc.126
 
RK Associates, Raanan Katz Were Alleged In Unlawful Ejectment In Miami
RK Associates, Raanan Katz Were Alleged In Unlawful Ejectment In MiamiRK Associates, Raanan Katz Were Alleged In Unlawful Ejectment In Miami
RK Associates, Raanan Katz Were Alleged In Unlawful Ejectment In Miami
 

Answer cross claim

  • 1. Krista Port STATE OF MINNESOTA DISTRICT COURT COUNTY OF HENNEPIN FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT CASE TYPE: WRD Carole Burns, trustee for the next of ) kin of Edmund Burns, decedent, and ) Carol Burns, individually, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) vs. ) ANSWER AND CROSS CLAIM ) Harry’s Cement Mix, Inc., a Minnesota ) Corporation, and Clifford Marcus, ) ) Court File No. 00-276 Defendants. ) Defendant Clifford Marcus, for his answer to the Complaint of the Plaintiffs herein, states as follows: I. He admits paragraphs I, II, III, V, and IX of Plaintiffs’ Complaint. II. He denies paragraph IV of Plaintiffs’ Complaint. III. He denies that he was negligent as alleged in paragraph VI of said Complaint. IV. He is without sufficient information to form a belief as to the truth or falsity of Plaintiffs’ allegation as to Plaintiff Edmund Burns being injured as found in paragraph VI, and puts Plaintiffs’ to their proof thereof.
  • 2. V. He is without sufficient information to form a belief as to the truth or falsity of paragraphs VII, VIII, IX, and X and puts Plaintiffs to their proof thereof; and further states that in the event Plaintiffs suffered damages as alleged, such damages were the result of the negligence of Plaintiff Edmund Burns. VI. Except as admitted or otherwise qualified herein, Defendant Clifford Marcus denies each and every allegation in said Complaint contained. CROSS CLAIM Defendant Clifford Marcus, for his cross claim against Harry’s Cement Mix Inc., states and alleges as follows: I. That at the time and place referred to in Plaintiffs’ Complaint, this answering Defendant was in the course and scope of his employment with Defendant, Harry’s Cement Mix, Inc., and as a result of his employment, he is entitled to indemnity and/or contribution for the payment of any damages adjourned against him on behalf of Plaintiffs from Defendant, Harry’s Cement Mix Inc. WHEREFORE, Defendant Clifford Marcus prays for judgment as follows: 1. Dismissing the Complaint of the Plaintiffs against this answering defendant. 2 D:ConFacconversion16825506answercrossclaim-130228021223-phpapp01.docx
  • 3. 2. In the event Plaintiffs are awarded judgment against this answering Defendant, he is entitled to judgment against Defendant, Harry’s Cement Mix, Inc., for indemnity and/or contribution thereof. 3. For such other and further relief as to the Court may deem just and equitable. STEPHENS, BOWEN & JANSEN ____________________________________ Mavis M. Pattee Attorney for Plaintiff 1601 Jefferson Street Alexandria, MN 56308 Tele: (320) 762-4516 Atty. Reg. No. 77-7777 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) SS COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) Clifford Marcus, being duly sworn, deposes and states that he is the defendant and the cross claimant in the above entitled action, that he has read the foregoing answer and cross claim, and that every statement contained therein is within his personal knowledge and is true and correct. ____________________________________ Clifford Marcus Subscribed and sworn to before me this 14th day of February 2012. ____________________________________ Notary Public The party(ies) upon whose behalf this pleading is submitted, by and through the undersigned, hereby acknowledge(s) that sanctions may be imposed for a violation of Minn. Stat. Section 549.211. ____________________________________ Mavis M. Pattee Attorney for Defendant Clifford Marcus 3 D:ConFacconversion16825506answercrossclaim-130228021223-phpapp01.docx