This study assessed 106 patients diagnosed with fibromyalgia for the presence of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and related disabilities. 24.5% of fibromyalgia patients met criteria for ADHD based on a standardized diagnostic interview. Patients with both ADHD and fibromyalgia had higher symptom severity, greater functional impairment especially in work/school, and higher rates of substance use disorders than fibromyalgia-only patients. The results suggest ADHD can increase the burden of fibromyalgia by adding specific disabilities in work and social activities, and is associated with increased use of opioid pain medications. Thorough evaluation of ADHD symptoms is recommended in fibromyalgia patients to identify those at risk of worse outcomes or medication misuse.
2. Adult Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder in Patients with Fibromyalgia Syndrome:
Assessment and Disabilities
Pallanti Stefanoa,b
Porta Francescoa,c
Salerno Luanaa
a
INS, Istituto di Neuroscienze, Florence (Italy)
b
Albert Einstein College of Medicine (New York), Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences
c
MedCare, Pistoia (Italy)
JournalPre-proof
3. Abstract
In the broader list of cognitive concerns, neuropsychological testing has shown that attentional
impairment may have a specific burden in Fibromyalgia Syndrome (FMS).
Preliminary observations have reported a subset of FMS patient screened for attention disorders
fulfilling the actual diagnosis of ADHD, a neurodevelopmental disorder characterized by
developmentally inadequate levels of inattention, hyperactivity and impulsivity that might persist in
adulthood. Yet, no study to date has systematically examined the history and the specific
contribution of ADHD to FMS in terms of clinical impact and related specific disabilities.
In this study, 106 individuals with a FMS diagnosis based on the 2010 criteria of the American
College of Rheumatology have been assessed for (a) the presence of ADHD; (b) the burden of
disability caused by ADHD versus FMS; (c) the presence of other psychiatric disorders. Results
indicated that ADHD was present in 24.5% of FMS individuals, it was associated with higher FMS
symptoms severity and a greater functional impairment, particularly in the work/school domain.
Moreover, patients with both FMS and ADHD had higher frequency of substance use disorders than
those with FMS only (38.5% versus 3.8%) and mainly opioids. Overall, results suggest that ADHD
can increase burden adding specific disability in work and social activities, and it is associated with
a trend for the excessive use of opioid painkillers. Detection of neurodevelopmental and actual
symptoms of ADHD is highly recommended especially in patient prone to increase the dose of anti-
pain medication.
Words count: 239
Keywords
FMS
ADHD
Burden of Disability
Opiate Misuse
JournalPre-proof
4. Adult Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder in Patients with Fibromyalgia Syndrome:
Assessment and Disabilities
Pallanti Stefanoa,b
Porta Francescoa,c
Salerno Luanaa
a
INS, Istituto di Neuroscienze, Florence (Italy)
b
Albert Einstein College of Medicine (New York), Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences
c
MedCare, Pistoia (Italy)
Corresponding author: Salerno Luana, salerno.luana@gmail.com
Highlights
• 24.5% of individuals with FMS also have ADHD
• Impairment due to ADHD brings increased total functional and even specific disability
• ADHD is associated with increased use of opiate and sedative drugs
Abstract
In the broader list of cognitive concerns, neuropsychological testing has shown that attentional
impairment may have a specific burden in Fibromyalgia Syndrome (FMS).
Preliminary observations have reported a subset of FMS patient screened for attention disorders
fulfilling the actual diagnosis of ADHD, a neurodevelopmental disorder characterized by
developmentally inadequate levels of inattention, hyperactivity and impulsivity that might persist in
adulthood. Yet, no study to date has systematically examined the history and the specific
contribution of ADHD to FMS in terms of clinical impact and related specific disabilities.
In this study, 106 individuals with a FMS diagnosis based on the 2010 criteria of the American
College of Rheumatology have been assessed for (a) the presence of ADHD; (b) the burden of
disability caused by ADHD versus FMS; (c) the presence of other psychiatric disorders. Results
indicated that ADHD was present in 24.5% of FMS individuals, it was associated with higher FMS
symptoms severity and a greater functional impairment, particularly in the work/school domain.
Moreover, patients with both FMS and ADHD had higher frequency of substance use disorders than
those with FMS only (38.5% versus 3.8%) and mainly opioids. Overall, results suggest that ADHD
can increase burden adding specific disability in work and social activities, and it is associated with
a trend for the excessive use of opioid painkillers. Detection of neurodevelopmental and actual
symptoms of ADHD is highly recommended especially in patient prone to increase the dose of anti-
pain medication.
Words count: 239
Keywords
FMS
ADHD
Burden of Disability
Opiate Misuse
JournalPre-proof
5. 1. Introduction
In the diagnostic process of the fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS) the detection of some cognitive
symptoms is part of the diagnostic assessment. However, despite a substantial proportion of patients
with FMS complains of a cognitive dysfunction such forgetfulness, inattention as well as declines in
cognitive function, working memory, and mental alertness-symptoms that have been termed
"fibrofog", those studies aiming to characterize the neuropsychological functioning of adults with
FMS reported some interesting but not conclusive results (Walteros et al 2011; Walitt et al 2011;
Park et al 2001; Grace et al 1999; Lee et al 2010; Landro et al 1997; Kim et al 2012; Walitt et 2008;
Suhr 2003; Miro et a 2011; Kratz et al 2019).
Attention Deficit /Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) is a neurodevelopmental disorder characterized
by inadequate levels of inattention, hyperactivity and impulsivity affecting the 2.8% of adult
population (Fayyad et al 2017), and there is growing evidence suggesting a high frequency of
symptoms of ADHD in people with FMS. Indeed, Reyero and colleagues (2011) found childhood
ADHD in 32.3% of women with FMS compared to the 2.52% of healthy controls, according to the
scores obtained at the WURS, whereas Derksen and colleagues (2015) found that 25% of their
patients with FMS fulfilled the DSM-5 Criteria for adult ADHD at the time of the (unspecified)
interview performed by a trained psychiatrist. More recently, Yilmaz & Tamam (2018) reported
that 29.5% of their female patients with FMS fulfilled the DSM criteria for the presence of ADHD
compared to 7.4% of controls, based on the scores obtained on rating scales, with significantly
different ratios in childhood and adolescent attention-hyperactivity disorder in these groups (33.3%
versus 11.1%, respectively). Overall, up to date evidence shows that both adult and childhood
ADHD are quite common in female fibromyalgia patients.
However, despite these undoubtedly interesting findings, it should be considered that in the studies
reported so far the diagnosis of ADHD has been made on the criteria but without a specific
diagnostic interview for adult ADHD that has been highly recommended (Pettersson et al 2016),
especially considering the overlapping symptomatology of the two condition. Moreover, there are
not studies that have examined if the presence of comorbid ADHD in FMS may eventually lead to
an additional burden of disability or not.
Hence, the question is still open: are attentional problems in FMS a true comorbidity with its own
related disabilities or can we consider them as just overlapping phenomena?
Therefore, in this study we aimed to examine if:
1. the co-occurrence of ADHD and FMS is a real comorbidity, using the “gold standard”
diagnostic interview for the retrospective and current assessment of ADHD symptoms in
adults,
2. it is possible to differentiate the burden of disability associated with each disorder,
3. the presence of ADHD is associated with a different pattern of psychiatric comorbidities.
2. Material and methods
2.1 Study design and participants
The study included 106 patients with FMS consecutively diagnosed by a reumatologist (FP) and a
specialist in psychiatry and neurophysiology (SP) at the Istituto di Neuroscienze (INS), Florence
JournalPre-proof
6. (Italy), between June 2017 and January 2020, and subsequently evaluated by other members of the
multidisciplinary team, i.e. an internist, a neurologist and a psychologist (LS).
For what concerns exclusion criteria, people whose education level was not sufficient to complete
the clinical interview and the rating scales included in this study were excluded, as well as those
with intellectual disability, schizophrenia, and other psychotic disorders. Subjects for whom a
collateral informant was not available to participate in the diagnostic interview were also excluded.
Based on these exclusion criteria, 8 patients have been excluded from the original sample of 114
subjects. Our local Human Ethics Committees approved the research protocol, the investigation was
performed in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki, and all patients gave
their written informed consent after the nature of the study and the procedures had been explained.
2.2 Diagnosis of fibromyalgia
The diagnosis of fibromyalgia was made on the basis of the 2010 criteria of the American College
of Rheumatology (ACR) (Wolfe et al 2010), which requires the administration of the Widespread
pain index (WPI) investigating the areas in which the patient had pain over the past weeks (score 0-
19) and the Symptom severity score (SS), which is divided into two parts. In the first one, fatigue,
waking unrefreshed and cognitive symptoms are evaluated on a severity scale ranging from 0 (no
problem) to 3 (severe). The second part requires physicians to evaluate the presence of a set of
symptoms that the patient experienced over the past week. The score of this part depends on the
number of experienced symptoms and must be added to the score of part 1 to determine the
symptom severity score. The only cognitive symptoms included in this second part are numbness,
thinking or memory problem.
According to these criteria, a patient meets diagnostic criteria for fibromyalgia if he/she presents:
1. widespread pain index (WPI) ≥7 and symptom severity (SS) scale score ≥5 or WPI 3-6 and
SS scale score ≥ 9;
2. symptoms that have been present at a similar level for at least three months, and
3. a pain that cannot be explained by another disorder.
In our sample, the presence of a somatic disease sufficiently explaining the symptoms has been
excluded (Fitzcharles et al 2013). For a clinical evaluation of the spectrum of FMS problems
affecting the last seven days, the Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire Revised version (FIQR,
Bennett et al 2009, Salaffi et al 2013), a self-administered questionnaire composed by 21 items (all
based on an 11-point numeric rating scale of 0–10) covering the three domains of function, overall
impact, and FMS symptoms has been used. The FIQR total score is the sum of the three domain
scores: the summed score for the 9-item function domain (range 0–90) is divided by three; the
summed score for the 2-item overall impact domain (range 0–20) remains as it is; and the summed
score for the 10-item symptom domain (range 0–100) is divided by two (Salaffi et al 2013). The
total maximum score is 100, with higher scores indicating greater disease impact.
The Fibromyalgia Assessment Status (FAS, Salaffi et al 2009) has been instead administered to
quantify the patient’s fatigue, sleep disturbances and pain. The pain is evaluated on the basis of the
16 non-articular sites included in the Self-Assessment Pain Scale (SAPS) (range 0 to 10) (Salaffi et
al 2009), and the FAS total score is calculated by summing the three subscores (non-articular pain,
fatigue and sleep) and dividing the result by three (range 0–10).
JournalPre-proof
7. 2.3 Diagnosis of ADHD
The assessment of ADHD in adults requires the investigation of the presence of core symptoms of
ADHD in both childhood and adulthood, and the assessment of how these symptoms interfere with
the subject’s functioning in more than one domain of daily life. In consideration of the complex
developmental presentation of ADHD, which can change its presentation during the lifetime, a
clinical interview such as the Diagnostic Interview for ADHD in Adults (DIVA) (Kooij 2010) has
been considered the “gold standard” for its detection (Pettersson et al 2016).
The DIVA 2.0 (Kooij 2010) has been developed on the basis of the criteria of the DSM-IV-TR, has
been validated by two studies (Petterson et al 2016; Ramos-Quiroga et al 2016), and recently
adapted to the new criteria for ADHD included in DSM-5 (APA, 2013; Kooij 2019b). According to
DSM-5, the number of symptoms required for a diagnosis of ADHD (from either the inattention
criteria or the hyperactivity/impulsivity criteria, or both) has been lowered from 6 to 5, and the age
of onset criteria requiring that symptoms should be present by age 7 years has been changed to
symptoms present by age 12 years. It includes both the childhood and adulthood DSM symptoms
list for ADHD, and provides examples of impairments that are commonly associated with the
symptoms in 5 areas of everyday life for each age group: work and education; relationships and
family life; social contacts; free time and hobby; self-confidence and self-image. The ADHD
diagnosis was made if the symptoms could not be better explained by the presence of another
psychiatric disorder. In our sample, the DIVA was completed with the patient in the presence of the
partner and/or a family member, to allow retrospective and collateral information to be ascertained
at the same time.
2.4 The diagnosis of disability associated with FMS or ADHD in patients with ADHD
In those patients who met the diagnostic criteria for adult ADHD, we investigated the functional
impairment associated with FMS and ADHD by using the Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS, Sheehan
et al., 1996), which allows the evaluation of disability in three domains, i.e. work/school, social
life/leisure activities and family life/home responsibilities. Each domain is scored from 0 (not at all)
to 10 (very severely), and by summarizing the scores obtained by each domains it is possible to
obtain the global SDS score, which ranges from 0 (unimpaired) to 30 (highly impaired) (Sheehan et
al., 1996).
2.5 The diagnosis of psychiatric comorbidities
The Clinician Version (CV) of Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5 (SCID-5-CV) has been
used to assess the presence of other psychiatric disorders. It has been released in 2014, consists of
10 modules covering 39 of the most common diagnoses of psychiatric conditions and permits to
screen for additional 16 diagnoses (First et al 2015). The SCID-5-CV assesses the presence of some
disorders (such as substance use disorders and obsessive-compulsive disorder) only as a current
diagnosis, while others as lifetime disorders (such as bipolar disorder and major depressive
disorder, among others). Since pain is the most prevalent symptom in fibromyalgia, treatments
directed toward pain relief includes analgesics, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and opioids
(Fitzcharles et al 2011). We considered the presence of an opioid use disorder in patients with FMS
when they reported “aberrant drug-related behaviors” according to the Portenoy’s list (1996), and if
the patient admitted to accessing opioids by aberrant means.
JournalPre-proof
8. 2.6 Statistical analysis
Data were analyzed using the program IBM SPSS Statistics 23. Sex and comorbid psychiatric
disorders have been presented as a percentage, whereas scores obtained at rating scales have been
presented as medians. Analyses used for comparing FMS subjects with or without ADHD included
Mann-Whitney U test for independent samples. For what concerns the analysis of differences in
Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) scores, an exact sign test has been used since the differences
between paired observations were neither normal nor symmetrical. To compare comorbidity
between groups the Fisher’s exact test was used. Statistical significance was set up at p<0.05, two-
tailed.
3. Results
Our sample of adults with FMS was composed by 11 males and 95 females. Age, sex, and years of
education of the whole group of adults with FMS and divided according to the presence or not of
ADHD have been reported in Table 1.
In this sample, 26 subjects with FMS had ADHD (24.5%) and they were all females. Regarding the
adult clinical presentation, 18 (69.2%) patients had combined ADHD, whereas 8 (30.8%) had
predominantly inattentive ADHD. For what concerns childhood ADHD, 16 (61.5%) had the
combined, and 10 (38.5%) had the predominantly inattentive presentation. In both cases, none had a
predominantly hyperactive-impulsive presentation of ADHD. There was a statistically significant
difference in age between patients with both ADHD and FMS compared to those with FMS only
(p<.0001), but not in years of education, ranging from 8 to 18 years. As shown in Table 2, subjects
with both ADHD and FMS had higher FIQR and FAS scores compared to those with FMS only
(p<.05).
Table 1. Demographic characteristics of the sample
CHARACTERISTIC FMS (n=106)
FMS only
(n=80)
FMS +ADHD
(n=26)
p
Age, mean (SD), years 41.70 (±8.18) 39,76 (±7.09) 47.65 (±8.56) p<.0001
Sex, No. (%)
Male 11 (10.4%) 11 (13.8%) -
Female 95 (89.6%) 69 (86.3%) 26 (100%)
Education (years) 11.83 (±2.52) 11.59 (±2.41) 12.58 (±2.74) p =.117
JournalPre-proof
9. Figure 1. ADHD clinical presentation in childhood and adulthood
Table 2. Differences in Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire Revised version (FIQR) and
Fibromyalgia Assessment Status (FAS) scores between groups
Rating Scales FMS (N=106) FMS only
(n=80)
FMS+ADHD
(n=26)
p*
FIQR Median Median Median
Function sub-total 15.3 15.3 18.0 p=.008
Overall impact sub-total 10.0 10,0 10.5 p=.027
Symptoms sub-total 25.0 24.0 27.75 p<.0001
Total score 50,0 49,1 56.10 p<.0001
FAS
Total score 5.7 5.6 6.5 p<.0001
FIQR= Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire Revised
FAS= Fibromyalgia Assessment Status
*statistically significant based on Mann-Whitney U Test
In those subjects who met criteria for adult ADHD, we investigated the distinct effect of ADHD and
FMS on perceived disability, as measured by the SDS. As not all data were normally nor
symmetrically distributed, we used an exact sign test. There was a statistically median increase in
disability ADHD-related in SDS work/school and total scores compared to FSM. Specifically, of
the 26 patients with both ADHD and FMS 25 had “positive differences”, meaning that they had
greater disability in the work/school domain associated with ADHD. Indeed, medians at SDS
work/school domain were 7 for disability FMS-related versus 10 for disability ADHD-related
(p<.0001). Similarly, 19 patients out of 26 reported greater total disability, as measured by SDS
total score, associated with ADHD. Indeed, median FMS-related SDS total score was 22 versus 24
of that ADHD-related (p=.001). For what concerns functional disability associated with FMS, 18
patients reported greater functional impairment in social life because of FMS. Indeed, median FMS-
related SDS Social life domain score was 7.50 whereas median ADHD-related SDS Social life
score was 6 (p=.011). Conversely, there was not a statistically significant difference between the
two groups for what concerns impairment in family life, as median FMS-related SDS Family life
score was 8.50 whereas ADHD-related was 8 (p=.064).
JournalPre-proof
10. Table 3 shows the different pattern of lifetime comorbid disorders characterizing our sample of
patients. According to Fisher’s Exact Test results, patients with FMS had a statistically significant
higher rate of Anxiety disorders compared to those with both FSM and ADHD, whereas individuals
with both FMS and ADHD have shown a statistically significant higher frequency of substance use
disorders than those with FMS only. Specifically, only patients with ADHD presented current
cannabis use and opioid use disorders, and a frequency two-fold higher of sedative, hypnotic or
anxiolytic use disorder. The difference between the two groups regarding the proportion of opioid
use and sedative, hypnotic or anxiolytic use disorders was statistically significant (p>.05). In those
subjects with both ADHD and FMS who also had SUDs, the abused prescription drugs were
tramadol (n=1), oxycodone/naloxone combination (n=2), and clonazepam (n=6).
Table 3. The frequency of psychiatric diagnoses according to SCID-5-CV
Primary psychiatric comorbid
disorders
FMS (n=106) FMS only
(n=80)
FMS +ADHD
(n=26)
p-values*
Major Depressive Disorder 16 (15.1%) 13 (16.3%) 3 (11.5%) p=.076
Anxiety Disorders 33 (31.1%) 30 (37.5%) 3 (11.5%) p=.015
Bipolar Disorder 7 (6.6%) 6 (7.5%) 1 (3.8%) p=1.00
Substance Use Disorders 13 (12.3%) 3 (3.8%) 10 (38.5%) p=.000
- Cannabis Use - 1 (3.8%) p=.245
- Opioid Use - 3 (11.5%) p=.013
- Sedative, Hypnotic, or Anxiolytic
Use
- 3 (3.8%) 6 (23.1%) p=.006
Sleep Disorders 27 (25.5%) 21 (26.3%) 6 (23.1%) p=1.00
Eating Disorders 3 (2.8%) 2 (2.5%) 1 (3.8%) p=1.00
Obsess Compuls Disorders 5 (4.7%) 5 (6.3%) - p=.331
Gambling Disorder 2 (1.9%) - 2 (7.7%) p=0.58
SCID-5-CV: Clinician Version (CV) of Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5
*Fisher’s Exact Test, p<.05, two-sided
4. Discussion
Adult ADHD has been found in 24.5% of our sample of adults with FMS, a frequency that is more
than 8 times greater than that of adult ADHD reported by epidemiological studies (Fayyad et al
2017). Such a frequency appeared in line with data reported by Derksen et al (2015), but lower
than that by Yilmaz & Tamam (2018). We found a greater rate of combined presentation of ADHD
in both childhood and adulthood, unlike from findings from Reyero et al. (2011), who found higher
scores for the WURS items pertaining to attention deficit compared to those of hyperactivity-
impulsivity in their clinical sample of women with ADHD. However, the WURS is a self-
evaluation instrument, while this study is the first assessing the presence of ADHD in FMS patients
using a validated DSM-criteria based clinical interview for the retrospective and current assessment
of ADHD, administered in presence of collateral informants. Undoubtedly, this finding has great
clinical implications, as cognitive difficulties, restlessness, and fatigue are symptoms characterizing
both people with FMS and ADHD. Research showed that 70% of those with FMS complain a
JournalPre-proof
11. cognitive dysfunction named “fibro-fog”, which includes concentration problems, memory
difficulties and confusion (Kratz et al 2019). Therefore, FMS and ADHD are two apparently distant
disorders having cognitive fog in common. However, even though those with FMS showed worse
performance on standardized neuropsychological testing in comparison with controls, in the
domains of attention, working memory and processing speed the between-groups differences
resulted minor than a standard deviation (Kratz et al. 2019). On the other side, despite the well-
known presence of some cognitive deficits in people with ADHD, neuropsychological testing has
not proved useful in discriminating people with ADHD from those with other disorders (Kooij et al
2019a; Wasserman & Wasserman 2012). Indeed, approximately 11% of people affected do not have
a measurable cognitive deficit (Geffen & Forster 2018). For all these reasons, only a specific full
diagnostic interview can help clinicians to detect ADHD in people with FMS with an adequate
accuracy.
ADHD exerts a negative impact on several areas of functioning during the lifetime, and evidence
shows that people affected are characterized by lower educational and occupational outcomes than
those without the disorder (for a review see Kuriyan et al. 2013). Despite the amounting evidence of
the co-presence of these two conditions, to date there was no study exploring the different impact
on daily activities of ADHD and FMS in people with both disorders. According to our data, ADHD
adversely affects daily activities/functioning with a greater intensity than FMS. This is particularly
true for what concerns work/school activities, while FMS showed to exert a greater negative impact
on social life compared to ADHD.
For what concerns psychiatric comorbidities, it is noteworthy that, in our sample, while anxiety
disorders were significantly more frequent among subjects with FMS only, those with ADHD were
characterized by a higher frequency of substance use disorders, particularly sedative, hypnotic, or
anxiolytic use disorder and opioid use disorder than those without ADHD. This was not
unexpected, since the evidence from literature shows that adults with ADHD are twice as likely to
suffer from a substance dependence than those without the disorder (Martinez-Raga et al. 2013)
especially when not adequately treated (Zulauf et al. 2014). This finding may be of great value in
the pharmacological management of the patient with FMS because ADHD may constitute a specific
vulnerability factor for the excessive use of prescribed opioids and sedative medication.
The dopaminergic system has a central role in the modulation of pain perception and in analgesia
(Wood 2008; Reyero et al 2011), but it is also the target of most pharmacological agents for the
treatment of ADHD. Evidence up to date indicates lower D2-receptor binding and presynaptic
dopamine activity in people suffering from chronic pain (Taylor et al 2016), a disruption in
dopaminergic neurotransmission in people with FMS (Wood et al 2007a,b), and a positive effect of
drugs that enhance dopamine neurotransmission (Graven-Nielsen et al 2000; Holman & Myers
2005). This is line with previous research comparing 12 patients with FMS with 12 subjects
suffering from pain due to other causes that found that patients with FMS who had higher past and
present ADHD symptoms score experienced pain relief after taking ADHD medication (Krause et
al 1998). Similar results have been reported by Young and Redmond (2007), and more recently by
Katz and colleagues (2013), who found that a 30-day treatment of methylphenidate 10-60 mg daily
improved concentration, mood, and energy in 48 patients with FMS. The existence of a
dopaminergic dysfunction in FMS has received further support in the effectiveness of the dopamine
JournalPre-proof
12. D2/D3 agonist pramipexole, in improving pain and other symptoms in people with FMS in a trial
lasting 14-weeks (Holman et al 2004).
The findings of this study have to be seen in light of some limitations. ADHD is a
neurodevelopmental disorder with a childhood onset, and although 26 patients have met criteria for
both childhood and adult ADHD according to the DIVA, none of them had received a formal
diagnosis during the childhood. It may be the case that they may have received adequate external
support from teacher and parents, or had supportive internal resources, such as a high IQ, in line
with what it has been reported by the literature (Faraone & Biederman 2016; Franke et al 2018).
Indeed, we have not found a statistically significant difference in years of education between
patients with FMS only and those who received the “extra” diagnosis of ADHD. However, further
studies could deepen this aspect, for example by administering an IQ test.
The second issue requiring further exploration is that ADHD is known for being more prevalent in
males but in our study all ADHD cases were female. This may be due to the fact the fibromyalgia is
much more common in females than in males, and males were underrepresented in our study.
Future research could address these limitations by using larger samples of population, in which
there is a greater presence of males and gathering more information on the possible presence of
supports in developmental age, able to mask the presence of the disorder and prevent its
recognition.
Finally, the SCID-5-CV did not identify any patient suffering from current alcohol use disorder.
Although some of them reported some episodes of alcohol consumption mainly in social situations
or during meals, the number of criteria required for the current diagnosis was not met, but they
could have met them if the diagnostic clinical interview had investigated the lifetime presence of
the disorder. This limitation might be addressed in future studies, by using diagnostic interviews
investigating all the psychiatric disorders for both current and lifetime presentation.
Despite these limitations, our findings support the existence of a true comorbidity between FMS
and ADHD, the presence of a more severe FMS symptomatology in those patients who also have
ADHD, and a higher frequency of opioids and sedative, hypnotic, or anxiolytic use disorders that
has substantial clinical implications for both prevention and monitoring. Therefore, these two
conditions should be addressed as appropriate, considering the preliminary evidence suggesting a
positive effect of ADHD medications on pain and fatigue associated with FMS.
References
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders
(5th ed.). Arlington, VA: Author.
Bennett, R.M., Friend, R., Jones, K.D., Ward, R., Han, B.K., Ross, R.L., 2009. The Revised
Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQR): validation and psychometric properties. Arthritis Res
Ther. 11: R120
Derksen, M.T., Vreeling, M.J., Tchetverikov, I., 2015. High frequency of adult attention deficit
hyperactivity disorder among fibromyalgia patients in the Netherlands: should a systematic
collaboration between rheumatologists and psychiatrists be sought? Clin Exp Rheumatol. 33(1
Suppl 88): S141.
JournalPre-proof
13. Faraone, S.V., Biederman, J., 2016. Can attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder onset occur in
adulthood? JAMA Psychiat. 73(7):655–6. [PubMed: 27191055].
Fayyad, J., Sampson, N.A., Hwang, I., Adamowski, T., Aguilar-Gaxiola, S., Al-Hamzawi, A.,
Andrade, L.H., Borges, G., de Girolamo, G., Florescu, S., Gureje, O., Haro, J.M., Hu, C., Karam,
E.G., Lee, S., Navarro-Mateu, F., O'Neill, S., Pennell, B.E., Piazza, M., Posada-Villa, J., Ten Have,
M., Torres, Y., Xavier, M., Zaslavsky, A.M., Kessler, R.C., 2017. WHO World Mental Health
Survey Collaborators. The descriptive epidemiology of DSM-IV Adult ADHD in the World Health
Organization World Mental Health Surveys. Atten Defic Hyperact Disord. 9(1):47-65.
First, M.B., Williams, J.B., Karg, R.S., Spitzer, R.L., 2015. Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-
5 Disorders, Clinician Version (SCID-5-CV) Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Association.
Fitzcharles, M. A., Ste-Marie, P. A., Gamsa, A., Ware, M. A., & Shir, Y. (2011). Opioid use,
misuse, and abuse in patients labeled as fibromyalgia. American Journal of Medicine, 124(10),
955–960. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2011.05.031
Fitzcharles, M.A., Shir, Y., Ablin, J.N., et al., 2013. Classification and clinical diagnosis of
fibromyalgia syndrome: recommendations of recent evidence based interdisciplinary guidelines.
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2013:528952.
Franke, B., Michelini, G., Asherson, P., Banaschewski, T., Bilbow, A., 2018. Live fast, die young?
A review on the developmental trajectories of ADHD across the lifespan. Eur
Neuropsychopharmacol. 28(10):1059–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroneuro.2018.08.001.
Geffen, J., Forster, K., 2018. Treatment of adult ADHD: a clinical perspective. Ther Adv
Psychopharmacol. 8(1):25–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/2045125317734977.
Grace, G.M., Nielson, W.R., Hopkins, M., Berg, M.A., 1999. Concentration and memory deficits in
patients with fibromyalgia syndrome. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 21(4):477-87.
Graven-Nielsen, T., Aspegren, K.S., Henriksson, K.G., Bengtsson, M., Sorensen, J., Johnson, A.,
Gerdle, B., Arendt-Nielsen, L., 2000. Ketamine reduces muscle pain, temporal summation, and
referred pain in fibromyalgia patients. Pain. 85:483–491. [PubMed: 10781923]
Holman, A.J., Neiman, R.A., Ettlinger, R.E., 2004. Preliminary efficacy of the dopamine agonist,
pramipexole, for fibromyalgia: The first, open label, multicenter experience. J Musculoskelet Pain.
12(1):69–74.
Holman, A.J., Myers, R.R., 2005. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of
pramipexole, a dopamine agonist, in patients with fibromyalgia receiving concomitant medication.
Arthritis Rheum. 52(8):2495–505.
Instanes, J.T., Klungsøyr, K., Halmøy, A., Fasmer, O.B., Haavik, J., 2018. Adult ADHD and
Comorbid Somatic Disease: A Systematic Literature Review. J Atten Disord. 22(3):203-228. doi:
10.1177/1087054716669589. Epub 2016 Sep 1.
Jahan, F., Nanji, K., Qidwai, W., Qasim, R., 2012. Fibromyalgia syndrome: an overview of
pathophysiology, diagnosis and management. Oman Med J. 27(3):192–195.
doi:10.5001/omj.2012.44
Katz, R.S., Bond, H., Leavitt, F., 2013. Methylphenidate improves concentration, energy and mood
in fibromyalgia. Arthritis Rheum. 65(S10):S470
Kim, S.H., Kim, S.K., Nam, E.J., Han, S.W., Lee, S.J., 2012. Spatial versus verbal memory
impairments in patients with fibromyalgia. Rheumatol Int. 32(5):1135-42.
JournalPre-proof
14. Kooij, J.J.S., 2010. Diagnostic Interview for ADHD in Adults 2.0 (DIVA 2.0). Adult ADHD.
Diagnostic assessment and treatment. Amsterdam: Pearson Assessment and Information BV.
Kooij, J.J.S., Bijlenga, D., Salerno, L., Jaeschke, R., Bitter, I., Balázs, J., 2019a. Updated European
consensus statement on diagnosis and treatment of adult ADHD. Eur Psychiatry. 56:14–34.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eur psy.2018.11.001.
Kooij JJS, Francken MH, Bron TI. Diagnostic interview for ADHD in adults. March 2019b.
Available at www.divacenter.eu
Kratz, A. L., Whibley, D., Kim, S., Sliwinski, M., Clauw, D., & Williams, D. A.,2019. Fibrofog in
daily life: An examination of ambulatory subjective and objective cognitive function in
fibromyalgia. Arthritis Care & Research, 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.24089
Krause, K.-H., Krause, J., Magyarosy, I., Ernst, E., & Pongratz, D. (1998). Fibromyalgia syndrome
and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: Is there a comorbidity and are there consequences for
the therapy of fibromyalgia syndrome? Journal of Musculoskeletal Pain, 6, 111-116.
Kuriyan, A.B., Pelham, W.E. Jr, Molina, B.S., et al. 2013. Young adult educational and vocational
outcomes of children diagnosed with ADHD. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 41(1):27–41.
doi:10.1007/s10802-012-9658-z
Landro, N.I., Stiles, T.C., Sletvold, H., 1997. Memory functioning in patients with primary
fibromyalgia and major depression and healthy controls. J Psychosom Res. 42(3):297-306.
Lee, D.M., Pendleton, N., Tajar, A., O'Neill, T.W., O'Connor, D.B., Bartfai, G., et al. 2010. Chronic
widespread pain is associated with slower cognitive processing speed in middle-aged and older
European men. Pain. 151(1):30-6.
Martinez-raga, J., Szerman, N., Knecht, C., de Alvaro, R., 2013. Attention deficit hyperactivity
disorder and dual disorders. Educational needs for an underdiagnosed condition. 25(3), 231–243.
https://doi.org/10.1515/ijamh-2013-0057
Miro, E., Lupianez, J., Hita, E., Martinez, M.P., Sanchez, A.I., Buela-Casal, G., 2011. Attentional
deficits in fibromyalgia and its relationships with pain, emotional distress and sleep dysfunction
complaints. Psychol Health. 26(6):765-80.
Park, D.C., Glass, J.M., Minear, M., Crofford, L.J., 2001. Cognitive function in fibromyalgia
patients. Arthritis Rheum. 44(9):2125-33.
Pettersson, R., Söderström, S., & Nilsson, K. W. (2016). Diagnosing ADHD in Adults : An
Examination of the Discriminative Validity of Neuropsychological Tests and Diagnostic
Assessment Instruments. J Atten Disord. 2015 Dec 17 https://doi.org/10.1177/1087054715618788
Portenoy, R.K., 1996. Opioid therapy for chronic nonmalignant pain: a review of the critical issues.
J Pain Symptom Manage.11(4):203-217.
Ramos-Quiroga, J.A., Nasillo, V., Richarte, V., Corrales, M., Palma, F., Ibáñez, P., Michelsen, M.,
Van de Glind, G., Casas, M., Kooij, J.J., 2016. Criteria and concurrent validity of DIVA 2.0: a
semi-structured diagnostic interview for adult ADHD. Journal of Attention Disorders, pii:
1087054716646451
Reyero, F., Ponce, G., Rodriguez-Jimenez, R., Fernandez-Dapica, P., Taboada, D., Martin, V.,
Navio, M., Jimenez-Arriero, M. A., Hoenicka, J., & Palomo, T. (2011). High frequency of
childhood ADHD history in women with fibromyalgia. European Psychiatry, 26(8), 482–483.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpsy.2010.03.012
JournalPre-proof
15. Roy, M., de Zwaan, M., Tuin, I., Philipsen, A., Brähler, E., Müller, A., 2018. Association Between
Restless Legs Syndrome and Adult ADHD in a German Community-Based Sample. J Atten Disord.
22(3):300-308. doi: 10.1177/1087054714561291. Epub 2015 Jan 2.
Salaffi, F., Sarzi-Puttini, P., Girolimetti, R., Gasparini, S., Atzeni, F., Grassi, W., 2009.
Development and validation of the self-administered Fibromyalgia Assessment Status: a disease-
specific composite measure for evaluating treatment effect. Arthritis Res Ther.11(4):R125.
doi:10.1186/ar2792
Salaffi, F., Franchignoni, F., Giordano, A., Ciapetti, A., Sarzi-Puttini, P., & Ottonello, M. (2013).
Psychometric characteristics of the italian version of the revised fibromyalgia impact questionnaire
using classical test theory and rasch analysis. Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology,
31(SUPPL.79), 41–49.
Sheehan, D.V., Harnett‐Sheehan, K., Raj, B.A., 1996. The measurement of disability. Int Clin
Psychopharmacol. 11(Suppl 3): 89–95.
Suhr, J.A., 2003. Neuropsychological impairment in fibromyalgia - Relation to depression, fatigue,
and pain. Journal of Psychosomatic Research. 55(4):321-9.
Taylor, A.M.W., Becker, S., Schweinhardt, P., et al., 2016. Mesolimbic dopamine signalling in
acute and chronic pain: Implications for motivation, analgesia, and addiction. Pain. 157(6):1194–8.
Verbunt, J.A., Pernot, D.H. & Smeets, R.J., 2008. Disability and quality of life in patients with
fibromyalgia. Health Qual Life Outcomes 6, 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-6-8
Walitt, B., Roebuck-Spencer, T., Bleiberg, J., Foster, G., Weinstein, A., 2008. Automated
neuropsychiatric measurements of information processing in fibromyalgia. Rheumatol Int.
28(6):561-6.
Walitt, B., Fitzcharles, M.A., Hassett, A.L., Katz, R.S., Hauser, W., Wolfe, F.,2011. The
longitudinal outcome of fibromyalgia: a study of 1555 patients. J Rheumatol. 38(10):2238-46.
Walteros, C., Sánchez-Navarro, J. P., Muñoz, M. A., Martínez-Selva, J. M., Chialvo, D., &.
Montoya, P., 2011. Altered associative learning and emotional decision making in fibromyalgia. J
Psychosom Res.;70(3):294-301.
Wasserman, T., Wasserman, L.D., 2012. The sensitivity and specificity of neuropsychological tests
in the diagnosis of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Appl Neuropsychol Child. 1(2):90–9.
https://do i.org/10.1080/21622965.2012.702025.
Wolfe, F., Clauw, D.J., Fitzcharles, M.A., et al. 2010. The American College of Rheumatology
preliminary diagnostic criteria for fibromyalgia and measurement of symptom severity. Arthritis
Care Res. 62(5):600–610.
Wood, P.B., Schweinhardt, P., Jaeger, E., et al., 2007a. Fibromyalgia patients show an abnormal
dopamine response to pain. Eur J Neurosci. 25(12):3576–82.
Wood, P.B., Patterson, J.C., Sunderland, J.J., et al., 2007b. Reduced presynaptic dopamine activity
in fibromyalgia syndrome demonstrated with positron emission tomography: A pilot study. J Pain
8(1):51–8.
Wood, P.B., 2008. Role of central dopamine in pain and analgesia. Expert Rev Neurother. 8:781–
97.
Yılmaz, E., & Tamam, L. (2018). Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder and impulsivity in female
patients with fibromyalgia. Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, 14, 1883–1889.
https://doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S159312
JournalPre-proof
16. Young, J.L., Redmond, J.C., 2007. Fibromyalgia, chronic fatigue, and adult attention deficit
hyperactivity disorder in the adult: a case study. Psychopharmacol Bull. 40(1): 118-126
Yunus, M. B., 2008. Central Sensitivity Syndromes: A New Paradigm and Group Nosology for
Fibromyalgia and Overlapping Conditions, and the Related Issue of Disease versus Illness. Semin
Arthritis Rheum. 37, 339–352.
Zulauf, C. A., Sprich, S. E., Safren, S. A., & Wilens, T. E. (2014). The complicated relationship
between attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder and substance use disorders topical collection on
child and adolescent disorders. Current Psychiatry Reports, 16(3). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-
013-0436-6
JournalPre-proof
17. Conflict of Interest
All authors have participated in (a) conception and design, analysis and interpretation of
the data; (b) drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content;
and (c) approval of the final version.
This manuscript has not been submitted to, nor is under review at, another journal or
other publishing venue.
The authors have no affiliation with any organization with a direct or indirect financial
interest in the subject matter discussed in the manuscript.
JournalPre-proof