A STUDY ON THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN LEADERSHIP STYLES AND TEACHERS’ JOB SATISFACTION IN TEN SCHOOL IN PETALING PERDANA

1. CHAPTER 3
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
3.0 Introduction
This chapter will discuss on research design, sampling design, instrument, data
collection procedures and analysis of data for this study.
3.1 Research Design
This study will use quantitative method research and get finding through survey. The
purpose of this study is to investigate the Relationship Between Leadership Styles and
Teacher Job Satisfaction in Ten School in Ten School Petaling Perdana. The
questionnaire and semi-structure interview are used to investigate the Relationship
Between Leadership Styles and Teacher Job Satisfaction in Ten School in Petaling
Perdana.
3.2 Sampling Design
3.2.1 Population
The population is an interesting group for research, a group where
researchers wish to generalize the results of the study. In organizational
research, interest populations are usually groups of people like workers
in an organization. Therefore, the population of this study was the
teacher in Ten School in Petaling Perdana.
3.2.2 Sample
Data will be collected directly from the teacher in ten school in Petaling
Perdana. Samples from the population of this study are 100
respondents.
Ten School in Petaling Perdana will involve in this study are:
1) SK SEKSYEN ENAM
2) SK BANDAR ANGGERIK
3) SK SHAH ALAM

2. 4) SK SEKSYEN 7
5) SK SEKSYEN 9
6) SK SEKSYEN 17
7) SK SEKSYEN 18
8) SK SEKSYEN 19
9) SK SEKSYEN 20
10) SK SEKSYEN 24
3.3 Instrument
This study studies a set of questions from the questionnaire and interview.
3.3.1 Questionnaire
A set of questionnaire as shown in Table 3.1 will be given to teacher. It is
adapted from Leadership Style Questionnaire and Job Satisfaction Survey
(JSS) and minor adjustment were made. The aim of this questionnaire is to
identify the leadership style among the leader in the ten school in Petaling
Perdana and to evaluate the level of teachers’ job satisfaction at the ten school
in Petaling Perdana.
3.3.2 Interview
A semi-structure interview as shown in Table 3.2 will be conducted to determine
leadership style influence teachers’ job satisfaction in the ten school in Petaling
Perdana.

3. Description of the questionnaire is as following:
SECTION DESCRIPTION NUMBER OF ITEM
Section A:
Demographic
Information
This section carries the
general question on
demographic data of
the respondents.
3 Items: Question 1-3
Section B: Leadership
Style
This section carries the
questions leadership
style.
18 Items: Question 1-
18
Section C: Teachers’
Job Satisfaction
This section carries the
questions teachers’ job
satisfaction.
26 Items: Question 1-
26
Table 3.1 Description of Questionnaire
Description of the semi-structure is as following:
SECTION DESCRIPTION NUMBER OF ITEM
Teachers’ Perspective
on Leadership Style
This section carries the
question teachers’
Perspective on
Leadership Style
4 Items: Question 1-4
Table 3.2 Description of semi-structure Interview

4. 3.4 Data Collection
The respondent of this study are teachers from Ten School in Petaling Perdana.
Before the teacher take the survey, there will be a short briefing and explanation
on the procedures. The briefing is on what they should answer and how they
must answer the questionnaire. The questionnaire is distributed and collected
after the respondents completed answering the questionnaire.
The data collection is as following:
Figure 3.1 Summary of the Questionnaire Collection Procedures
3.5 Data Analysis
All data obtained from the questionnaire and semi-structure interview were
collected and analysed to provide answer to the question for the research. The
data from the questionnaires section B will be analysed by calculate the sum
from the question to identify the leadership style among the leader while the
data from the questionnaires section C are analysed and interpreted through
descriptive by using Statistical Package of Social Science (SPSS) version 22.
Design of Questionnaire
Sample Selection
Questionnaire Distribution
Questionnaire Collection
Survey Process
Assessment Process

5. REFERENCES
Aliakbari, M., & Darabi, R. (2013). On The Relationship between Efficacy of Classroom
Management , Transformational Leadership Style , and Teachers ’ Personality.
Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 93(2008), 1716–1721.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.105
Amanchukwu, R. N., Stanley, G. J., & Ololube, N. P. (2015). A Review of Leadership
Theories, Principles and Styles and Their Relevance to Educational
Management. Management, 5(1), 6–14.
https://doi.org/10.5923/j.mm.20150501.02
Clark, C. C. (2009). Creative nursing leadership & management. Creative Nursing
Leadership & Management, 1–52. Retrieved from
http://www.jblearning.com/samples/0763749761/49761_pt01_clark.pdf
Ebru, O. (2010). The relationship between the leadership styles of the school
administrators and the organizational citizenship behaviours of teachers, 9, 1188–
1193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.305
Forces, M., & Naz, S. (2017). Factors Affecting Teachers Job Satisfaction, XII(2), 44–
59.
Hussin, S., Ai-hwa, D. Q., & Sau-cheong, L. (2008). Policy into Practice : The
Challenge for Special Education in Malaysia, 1–4.
Machumu, H. J., & Kaitila, M. M. (2014). Influence of Leadership styles on Teachers ’
job satisfaction : A case of selected Primary Schools in Songea and Morogoro
Districts , Tanzania, 6(April), 53–61. https://doi.org/10.5897/IJEAPS12.036
Martin, S. T. (2009). Relationship Between the Leadership Styles of Principals and
School Culture.
Mohamad, M., & Jais, J. (2016). Emotional Intelligence and Job Performance : A Study
Among Malaysian Teachers. Procedia Economics and Finance, 35(October

6. 2015), 674–682. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(16)00083-6
Nanjundeswaras, T. S., & Swamy, D. R. (2014). Leadership styles, 7(2), 57–63.
Nyenyembe, F. W., Maslowski, R., Nimrod, B. S., & Peter, L. (2016). Leadership Styles
and Teachers ’ Job Satisfaction in Tanzanian Public Secondary Schools, 4(5),
980–988. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2016.040507
Nyiha, G. M. (2015). INFLUENCE OF PRINCIPALS LEADERSHIP STYLES ON
TEACHERS JOB SATISFACTION IN PUBLIC SECONDARY SCHOOLS IN
KIAMBU SUB-COUNTY, KIAMBU COUNTY, KENYA.
Raj, A., Arokiasamy, A., Ghani, A., Abdullah, K., Zohir, M., Shaari, A., & Ismail, A.
(2016). Transformational Leadership Of School Principals And Organizational
Health Of Primary School Teachers In Malaysia. Procedia - Social and Behavioral
Sciences, 229, 151–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.07.124
Shafie, B., Baghersalimi, S., & Barghi, V. (2013). THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN
LEADERSHIP STYLE AND ( Case Study of Real Estate Registration
Organization of Tehran Province ), 2(5), 21–29.
Silas O.Falokun. (2016). Requirements for the Degree Doctorate of Education Grand
Canyon University Phoenix , ArizonaEducational Leadership Style and Teacher
Job Satisfaction Submitted by Silas O . Falokun A Dissertation Presented in
Partial Fulfillment of the.
Smith, T. M. (1999). A STUDY OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE
PRINCIPAL’S LEADERSHIP STYLE AND TEACHER MOTIVATION: THE
TEACHERS’ PERSPECTIVE.
Song, S., & Mustafa, M. (2015). Factors Impacting on Teachers ’ Job Satisfaction
related to Science Teaching : A Mixed Methods Study, 26(3), 358–375.
Wahab, S., Rahmat, A., Yusof, M. S., & Mohamed, B. (2016). Organization
Performance and Leadership Style: Issues in Education Service. Procedia -
Social and Behavioral Sciences, 224(August 2015), 593–598.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.447

7. Zakeer Ahmed Khan, Allah Nawaz, & Irfanullah Khan. (2016). Leadership Theories
and Styles : A Literature Review Leadership. Journal of Resources Development
and Management, 16(January), 1–7.
Zembat, R., Koçyi, S., Tu, M. N., & Do, H. (2010). The relationship between the
effectiveness of preschools and leadership styles of school managers, 2, 2269–
2276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.321