Ce diaporama a bien été signalé.
Le téléchargement de votre SlideShare est en cours. ×

UNCRC30+1 presentation (1).pptx

Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Prochain SlideShare
SABER fact sheet ECD
SABER fact sheet ECD
Chargement dans…3
×

Consultez-les par la suite

1 sur 10 Publicité

Plus De Contenu Connexe

Similaire à UNCRC30+1 presentation (1).pptx (20)

Plus récents (20)

Publicité

UNCRC30+1 presentation (1).pptx

  1. 1. Outline  Overview of the Child Rights Situation Report (Report Card)  Advocacy efforts of SC Georgia CO to influence the GoG to undertake commitments with respect to children’s rights (UNCRC30 celebration)  The commitments made by Georgia  Steps taken to fulfil the commitments  Challenges and lessons learned in the process
  2. 2. Child Rights Situation Report – Report Card 2019 • The 2019 report covers ten main themes, which were identified by the CCY as the most pressing issues in the child rights sector: 1/31/2023 3 Objective: Introducing a new monitoring and accountability mechanism with a purpose of assessing the annual progress achieved by state in child rights area. children with disabilities; violence against children; prevention and family support services; child poverty and deinstitutionalization; tendencies of institutionalized childcare; shortcomings in the implementation of the reintegration program; stillbirth and infant mortality; juvenile justice system; social work in the childcare systems and the policies and practices of its quality application at early and preschool education.
  3. 3. Child Rights Situation Report – Report Card 2019  The Importance of the Initiative for Save the Children and its Role in the Process:  Exemplary state of strategic partnership established between the members of the Coalition in fundraising and implementing projects  As a board member of the CCY, Save the Children was involved in creating a new tool.  Save the Children was actively supporting the project implementation team in the process of selecting the relevant areas to focus, gathering data and through providing external expertise to the final report.  The Result of the Work and Further Steps  The average grade assigned to the government of Georgia in the child rights area was 2.18 out of possible 5.  The areas such as child poverty and deinstitutionalization (overall score 1), prevention and family support services (overall score: 1.5) and institutionalized childcare system in Georgia (overall score 1.5) are the most overlooked fields in child rights protection field.  The advocacy strategy will be developed by the Coalition to address the challenges revealed by the Report Card 2019.  To raise public awareness on the issue, series of infographics with the findings of the Report were developed and shared.  The findings of the Report Card were also imbedded in the communication strategy developed under a new project that aims at inclusion of issue of child rights in the election agendas of the political parties. 1/31/2023 Improving Preschool Education in Georgia through Social Accountability Processes 4
  4. 4. Advocacy efforts of SC Georgia CO to influence the GoG to undertake commitments with respect to children’s rights (UNCRC30 celebration) 1/31/2023 5 Selecting the key stakeholder • The Human Rights Secretariat under the Prime Minister’s Office of Georgia • The Prime Minister of Georgia • The Ministers of Education and Healthcare • The heads of the relevant Parliamentary Committees Issuing Advocacy Letters • Alongside with the Human Rights Secretariat and the Prime Minister, letters were drafted for the Ministries of Healthcare, Education and the relevant Parliamentary Committees Meetings with the Stakeholders • Follow-up meetings with the stakeholders
  5. 5. Commitment 1: Introduction of a Referral Mechanism for children between 7 to 18 years of age and provision of relevant services to beneficiaries  The urgency of the matter and steps taken to improve the situation  Up until September 2020, the children above the age of 12 demonstrating antisocial behavior were referred to Samtredia (West Georgia) boarding school.  The Ombudsman’s reports revealed that the Facility didn’t offer adequate environment/conditions for rehabilitation and development. There was no effective referral system for juveniles that could ensure results-oriented complex approach to them, their resocialization and separating them from illicit activities.  Starting from September 2020 a new referral mechanism was introduced. The mechanism consists of two institutions:  Child Referral Centre responsible for identification, referral and resocialization of those juveniles who have not committed a crime yet but have difficult behaviour or are inclined to such a behaviour; in addition, the Centre is entrusted to continue to create referral mechanisms for children who committed a criminal action; such children will become beneficiaries of relevant programmes and services respectively.  Child referral facilities (the semi-closed family-type institutions under the Ministry of Healthcare) for children in between the ages of 10-18. Said facilities are still to be established. 1/31/2023 6
  6. 6. Commitment 2: Undertake measures to increase the access of children with disabilities to inclusive education  The urgency of the matter and steps taken to improve the situation;  Notwithstanding the steps taken by GoG in the area of IE system strengthening, the challenges remain: the schools are not equipped to cater to the needs of children with various types of disabilities; the parents and teachers often refuse to acknowledge the special educational needs of the children and do not refer them for professional evaluation; the amount of psychologists and special pedagogues at schools remains scarce; the process of transformation of special schools into resource hubs is hampered by COVID-19 and lack of funding.  From 2088 public schools of Georgia, more than 9249 Special Education Need (SEN) students have access to inclusive education in 1423 public schools;  1919 special teachers are employed in 1382 public schools to support SEN students at general education level;  All new public school buildings are accessible for children with different disabilities (896 schools have ramps)  In compliance to the recommendation of specialists (teachers, special teachers, multidisciplinary team members), SEN students are provided with individual assistants, psychologists, occupation therapists, speech therapists, mobility and orientation specialists, sign language specialist (lack of funding at schools)  Additional support service - 13 integrated classes are available in public schools for autistic children and hearing-impaired children, 1 integrated class is available in the clinic for children suffering from leukemia; 1/31/2023 Improving Preschool Education in Georgia through Social Accountability Processes 7
  7. 7. Commitment 3: Provision of access to mandatory education for all out-of-school children within the next 5 years  Urgency of the matter and the steps taken to improve the situation:  Lack of official data regarding the amount of out-of-school children and the reasons for leaving the schools;  High levels of poverty, which encourages families to engage children in child labor at the expense of their education;  Lack of monitoring mechanisms enabling schools to report incidents of drop-out.  Low quality of general education in Georgia (PISA data 2018), which leaves the children leaving the schools after the 9th grade, without the skills and knowledge necessary for successful transition to labor market;  As a commitment, it was decided to streamline the program “second chance in education – a transition program from day care center to public schools” for street children.  A research designed to assess the exact amount of out-of-school children and the grounds on which they dropped out from the education system is being conducted. The research will be finalized by the end of the year. 1/31/2023 Improving Preschool Education in Georgia through Social Accountability Processes 8
  8. 8. Challenges and Lessons learned  Challenges:  Absence of child-rights based budget allocations – lack of strategic and holistic vision regarding the challenges in child rights area; As a result, the budgetary allocations and existing programmes are fragmented, inefficient and often overlook the root causes of the problems;  As a result, the Government is often dependent on resources offered by CSOs – inefficiently allocated budget restricts them from incorporating the tools offered by organizations in their programmatic approaches.  Fragmented coordination among the Ministries and agencies entrusted with promoting the child rights;  Lack of strong watchdog organizations in child rights area – most of the activities undertaken by watchdog organizations are fragmented and concentrate on achieving short-term (albeit, often groundbreaking) achievements.  Lessons learned:  Vital importance of mechanisms assessing the performance of the government across all sectors of child rights field (holistic approach);  Need for introducing the Public Investment in Children approach to assess and advocate for more efficient spending;  The need of strong cooperation of SC with local watchdog organizations and Coalition  Progress achieved in areas with larger involvement of CSOs is several times higher than in other fields. 1/31/2023 Improving Preschool Education in Georgia through Social Accountability Processes 9

Notes de l'éditeur

  • Donor: World Bank
    The Global Partnership for Social Accountability (GPSA) is a global multi-stakeholder coalition of donors and development actors. It provides
    strategic and sustained funding and knowledge support to civil society organizations (CSOs) working together with governments to solve critical governance and development problems.

    The World Bank established the Global Partnership for Social Accountability (GPSA) in 2012 and since then it provides strategic and sustained support to civil society organizations (CSOs) and governments for social accountability initiatives aimed at strengthening transparency and accountability.

    Goal: Support government of Georgia in fulfilling obligations stated by the new law on Preschool Education and Care
    The preschool education reform carried out in 2005 was aimed at decentralizing a system that was previously centrally governed. As a result, since 2006, as per the Georgian Organic Law on Local Self-Government, establishment of preschool settings, approval of their statute/s, deciding on their modus operandi and funding (varying from municipality to municipality) represents an exclusive competence of the local government. In 2016 Georgian parliament adopted the law Preschool Education and Care. Before that there was no comprehensive legislative framework regulating the field. The new law clearly describes the responsibilities of all governmental bodies in regard to preschool education system.

    The Project will support state of Georgia to ensure compliance with following municipal obligations stated by the new law: (a) provision of preschool education and care services in accordance with state preschools service standards; (b) ensuring parent participation; (c) development of operational monitoring, evaluation and reporting system for the preschool education and care service in compliance with standards that leads to state authorization of services; (d) establishing effective relations with parents and community; (e) studying municipal needs to plan local resources and prepare a budget adequately. Project approach is designed in line with above listed municipal obligations to guarantee law enforcement via viable monitoring (benchmarking) system focused on social accountability mechanism.


    Project Development Objective: Improve pre-school education monitoring systems in Georgian municipalities through collaborative, social accountability-oriented benchmarking activities

    Project Development Objective (PDO) is to improve pre-school education monitoring systems in Georgian municipalities through collaborative, social accountability-oriented benchmarking activities. Our strategic approach is to create a systematic, ground-level evaluation mechanisms for the preschool system in which the participation of a wide range of stakeholders, especially of service recipients, generates voice and accumulates valuable information to influence changes in the decision-making process with a particular focus on quality service delivery as well as better resource allocation.

×