4. United Kingdom
Last Budgeted IT Purchase – Study of 500
European ITDMs in 2015
When was this last budgeted IT purchase (i.e., one that required some degree
of research and comparative information) made?
4
0%
15%
30%
45%
60%
Less than 3 months ago 3-6 months ago 6-9 months ago 9-12 months ago More than 12 months
ago
• 500+ completes
• 55% IT Manager+
• 50% Multiple Departmental purchase
• 45% renewal/upgrade
• 50% new purchase
7. United Kingdom
Buyer short listing doesn’t come from one
asset download
How many pieces of content (e.g. videos, white papers, case studies, etc.) did
you download/view that was produced by the vendor you selected for your
last IT purchase?
7
0%
15%
30%
45%
60%
1 2 - 3 4 - 6 7 - 10 More than 10
8. 8
Specific assets are more relevant to IT buyers
at specific times during the buying process
10. United Kingdom
Identify in all areas of the purchase cycle or
you’ll miss out on short lists
Did you download/view content that was created by technology vendors or
third-party experts/analysts (e.g., Gartner, TechTarget's Editorial Team)?
10
0%
15%
30%
45%
60%
75%
Technology vendors only Independent third-party
experts/analysts only
I download/viewed content that was
created by both
The overwhelming majority said 2 to 4 people were engaged in the last purchase – the most people who download from a company in your campaign the more qualified you are to go after a project at that company.
vendors are downloading a minimum of 2 to 6 pieces of content from the vendor they select for their purchase. You’re not going to build re-engagement with only one content asset.
Let’s take this practice and evaluate type of content consumed. The majority of IT buyers view both vendors and 3rd party authored content. I can tell you that “3rd party” in this instance is defined as “not vendor exclusive content” but rather a neutral view point. The point is that a content mix that you’re presenting to the audience can’t be all about you but about the issue. This is very important as if you don’t identify yourself before the short list, you won’t be part of the short list.
Relevancy, in the past example, is the key characteristic for buyers when evaluating content.
Slide 12
To help you understand where our strategy and research come together, we’ve designed this cheat sheet to help you think through how to essentially create a conversation from content… what the content should do, what format it should be in, who should communicate it, whether or not to gate it, how long to make it, and where to distribute it.
The first thing worth pointing out is this idea of lifecycle. In marketing most of us are so attuned to thinking “buy cycle” that we often depriortize the publication of content to satisfy the customer we already have in favor of the customer we’re trying to get… that or we leave it up to the technical folks
Focusing on lifecycle publishing can do 2 things for you 1- it can help improve overall customer service and satisfaction and 2- identify where and when existing customers may be cross sell/upsell candidates (or even more importantly, looking to bail)
Now each of those stages supports several different types of content, which we parse out based on goal and ultimately, as you’ll see later, a more prescriptive mapping to formats, channels, gating and POVs
So across our 5 stages, we see content meeting about 9 goals.
These goals cover content that builds awareness, presents and pushes a perspective, drives adoption, lays out the specs, equips advocates, drives urgency, troubleshoots and sunsets
Believe it or not, breaking the goals out this granularly actually saves us time and resources when we get into production