Levine-Clark, Michael, “Humanities E-Book Usage on a Global Scale,” Charleston Conference, Charleston, S.C. November 7, 2014
1. Humanities eBook Usage on a
Global Scale
Charleston Conference
November 7, 2014
Michael Levine-Clark
Associate Dean for Scholarly Communication &
Collections Services
University of Denver
2. How do students and scholars in the
arts and humanities use ebooks?
https://www.flickr.com/photos/aigle_dore/
6365101775. "Books," Moyan Brenn
3. How are arts and humanities
ebooks used?
https://www.flickr.com/photos/aigle_dore/
6365101775. "Books," Moyan Brenn
4. Ithaka S+R US Faculty Survey 2012, April 8, 2013, p. 34.
5. 100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
Arts/Humanities Social Sciences Science
Do not want to use
ebooks, but
sometimes there is no
other choice.
I use ebooks but I
prefer print
Ebooks are
acceptable
I prefer ebooks
Deborah Lenares, "Ebooks: Their Use and Acceptance by Undergraduates and Faculty," ER&L 2013.
http://proposalspace.com/publishdocs/220/download.
6. 100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
Business
Student Preference/Acceptance by Discipline
Students were asked: You are in the library doing research for a paper.
You find a book of interest and want to read at least a chapter.
Eng Computing Math
Humanities
Life Sciences
Physical Sciences
preferred acceptable not acceptable
Social Sciences
Studio & Perform arts
Total
Business
Eng Computing Math
Humanities
Life Sciences
Physical Sciences
Social Sciences
Studio & Perform arts
Total
Library print book Library's ebook
Chart by Deborah Lenares
Debbi Dinkins, Anne Cerstvik Nolan, Kathleen Sacco, and Robert Walsh, “Why the Resistance? Trends and Results from a
Collaborative Survey on E-Book Usage Across Eight Academic Institutions,” Charleston Conference, November 6, 2014.
ccby Deborah Lenares 2014
7. Previous Presentations
• Two different data sets
– Four years worth of usage
– 2013 usage
• ebrary 2013 – didn’t include all of the unused
books
• Testing the methodology
http://www.slideshare.net/MichaelLevineClark/pre
sentations
8. Data Overview
All ebooks from EBL
• Usage for 2013
• Worldwide
• Three library types
– Academic
– Public
– Special
• A focus on arts & humanities
9. Usage Definitions
• Session
– Any time that a user interacts with an e-book
• Page View
– A count of the number of pages examined
• Download
– A download of the entire book
• Usage Time
– Minutes spent looking at the book
10. What can we learn by examining usage
on such a large scale?
• Are we collecting the right things?
• Are there general patterns by subject?
• Can we identify disciplinary preferences?
• What are the best ways to measure use?
• Can those patterns and preferences help
shape our collections and guide our services?
11. Academic Library eBooks
• 379,111 titles
– Available on average in
72 libraries
• 345,891 titles with
LCCN
– Available on average in
73 libraries
300,000
250,000
200,000
150,000
100,000
50,000
0
Academic Public Special
12. Number of Titles Available, by LC Class
80000
70000
60000
50000
40000
30000
20000
10000
0
H
Q
P
NO LCCN
R
T
B
D
L
K
G
J
E
S
N
M
F
U
Z
C
V
A
STEM
Arts & Humanities
Social Sciences Other
13. Title Availability: Arts & Humanities
30000
25000
20000
15000
10000
5000
0
Art (N) History (C,
D, E, F)
Languages
(P-PM)
Literature
(PN-PZ)
Music (M) Philosophy
(B-BJ)
Religion
(BL-BX)
14. Academic Library eBook Usage –
345,891 titles with LCCN
On average in 2013, at each library, each title:
– Was held by 73.3 libraries
– Had 0.38 sessions
– Had 10.77 page views
– Had 0.11 downloads
– Was viewed for 5.6 minutes
15. Academic Library eBook Usage –
108,082 Arts & Humanities Titles
On average in 2013, at each library, each title:
– Was held by 68.0 libraries (vs 73.3 for all)
– Had 0.30 sessions (0.38)
– Had 8.85 page views (10.77)
– Had 0.09 downloads (0.11)
– Was viewed for 4.87 minutes (5.57)
16. Average Number of Libraries with
Title Available by Discipline
68 81 69
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Arts & Humanities Social Sciences STEM
17. Title Availability: By LC Class
90.0
80.0
70.0
60.0
50.0
40.0
30.0
20.0
10.0
0.0
H L J G E M Q D Z T B N F C R K P A V S U
73.3
68.0
Average availability across all subjects Average availability across A&H
Average number of academic libraries with title available
18. Title Availability: Arts & Humanities
78.00
76.00
74.00
72.00
70.00
68.00
66.00
64.00
62.00
60.00
58.00
56.00
20. Sessions Compared to Availability
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Social Sciences STEM Arts & Humanities
Availability
Sessions
Sessions are multiplied X100 to fit scale.
21. Sessions Compared to Availability:
Arts & Humanities
80.00
70.00
60.00
50.00
40.00
30.00
20.00
10.00
0.00
Availability
Sessions
(x100)
Sessions are multiplied X100
to fit scale.
23. The Disciplines
Humanities
B (Philosophy, Religion)
excluding BF (Psychology)
C, D, E, F (History)
M (Music)
N (Fine Arts)
P (Language & Literature)
Social Sciences
BF (Psychology)
H (Social Sciences)
J (Political Science)
K (Law)
L (Education)
U, V (Military, Naval Sciences)
STEM
Q (Science)
R (Medicine)
S (Agriculture)
T (Technology)
24. Percentage of Titles Used
90.00%
80.00%
70.00%
60.00%
50.00%
40.00%
30.00%
20.00%
% of Titles with a Session % of Titles with a View % of Titles Downloaded
32. Disciplinary Summary
• Social sciences outperform humanities and STEM in
two categories
– Percentage of books used
– Average amount of use
• STEM outperforms the others in actions per session
• Readers in the humanities spend more time in the
book per session
. . . but within the humanities . . .
33. Arts & Humanities Summary
• Art (N), Languages (P-PM), and Philosophy (B-BJ)
are used at a higher percentage and
average rate than other A&H subjects, and
generally than Social Sciences.
• On a percentage basis, History (C-F) and
Music(M) are used at about the same rate as
books overall, but the average usage is much
lower.
• Religion (BL-BX) and Literature (PN-PZ) show
poor use by all measures
34. Arts & Humanities Actions Per Session
• Views per session
Art, History, Music
Languages, Literature, Philosophy, Religion
• Downloads per session
Art, Languages, (Religion)
History, Literature, Music, (Philosophy)
• Time per session
History, Languages, Music, (Religion)
Art, Philosophy, (Literature)
36. Performance Relative to Predicted Use
0.25
0.2
0.15
0.1
0.05
0
H: 20.60% of titles available,
21.46% of titles with a session
L N J T H M R D E Z B G S V A C Q P K U F
% of Titles Available % of Titles with a Session
percentage difference
37. Performance Relative to Predicted Use
9.00%
8.00%
7.00%
6.00%
5.00%
4.00%
3.00%
2.00%
1.00%
0.00%
% of Titles Available
% of Titles with a Session
38. Performance Relative to Predicted Use
30.00%
25.00%
20.00%
15.00%
10.00%
5.00%
0.00%
L A R H G N J C Z M B D P T K S Q E F U V
% of Titles Available % of Sessions
H: 20.60% of titles available
26.49% of sessions
39. Performance Relative to Predicted Use
9.00%
8.00%
7.00%
6.00%
5.00%
4.00%
3.00%
2.00%
1.00%
0.00%
% of Titles Available
% of Sessions
40. CAN WE LEARN ANYTHING BY LOOKING
AT THE MOST HIGHLY USED TITLES?
41. Availability Overall Compared to
Presence in Top 10,000
50.00%
45.00%
40.00%
35.00%
30.00%
25.00%
20.00%
15.00%
10.00%
5.00%
0.00%
Social Sciences STEM Arts &
Humanities
Percentage of Titles
Available
% of Titles with a Session
in Top 10,000
42. Availability Overall Compared to
Presence in Top 100,000
50.00%
45.00%
40.00%
35.00%
30.00%
25.00%
20.00%
15.00%
10.00%
5.00%
0.00%
Social Sciences STEM Arts &
Humanities
Percentage of Titles
Available
% of Titles with a Session
in Top 100,000
43. Availability Overall Compared to
Presence in Top 10,000 (A&H)
9.00%
8.00%
7.00%
6.00%
5.00%
4.00%
3.00%
2.00%
1.00%
0.00%
Percentage of Titles
Available
% of Titles with a Session in
the top 10,000
44. Availability Overall Compared to
Presence in Top 100,000 (A&H)
9.00%
8.00%
7.00%
6.00%
5.00%
4.00%
3.00%
2.00%
1.00%
0.00%
Percentage of Titles
Available
% of Titles with a Session in
the top 100,000
46. Breadth vs Depth
PERCENTAGE OF TITLES USED
AVERAGE AMOUNT OF USE
47. EBL Sessions – Avg and %
Narrow (low %) but
Deep (more usage of
each title)
Broad (high %) and
Deep (more usage of
each title)
Narrow (low %) and
Shallow (low usage of
each title)
Broad (high % and
Shallow (low usage of
each title)
48. EBL Sessions – Avg and % (A&H)
Narrow (low %) but
Deep (more usage of
each title)
Broad (high %) and
Deep (more usage of
each title)
Narrow (low %) and
Shallow (low usage of
each title)
Broad (high % and
Shallow (low usage of
each title)
49. EBL Page Views – Avg and %
Narrow (low %) but
Deep (more usage of
each title)
Broad (high %) and
Deep (more usage of
each title)
Narrow (low %) and
Shallow (low usage of
each title)
Broad (high % and
Shallow (low usage of
each title)
50. EBL Page Views – Avg and % (A&H)
Narrow (low %) but
Deep (more usage of
each title)
Broad (high %) and
Deep (more usage of
each title)
Narrow (low %) and
Shallow (low usage of
each title)
Broad (high % and
Shallow (low usage of
each title)
51. EBL Downloaded – Avg and %
Narrow (low %) but
Deep (more usage of
each title)
Broad (high %) and
Deep (more usage of
each title)
Narrow (low %) and
Shallow (low usage of
each title)
Broad (high % and
Shallow (low usage of
each title)
52. EBL Downloaded – Avg and %
Narrow (low %) but
Deep (more usage of
each title)
Broad (high %) and
Deep (more usage of
each title)
Narrow (low %) and
Shallow (low usage of
each title)
Broad (high % and
Shallow (low usage of
each title)
56. Page Views Per Session
30.00
25.00
20.00
15.00
10.00
5.00
0.00
20.59
F N V M T E R Q G A D C H S P J K B Z U L
57. Page Views Per Session: A&H
24.00
23.00
22.00
21.00
20.00
19.00
18.00
17.00
20.59
Art Music History Literature Languages Philosophy Religion
58. Minutes Per Session (Time in the Book)
16.00
14.00
12.00
10.00
8.00
6.00
4.00
2.00
0.00
10.03
F E D J M C V G A K U R H P Q B T N S L Z
59. Minutes Per Session: A&H
14.00
12.00
10.00
8.00
6.00
4.00
2.00
0.00
10.03
History Music Languages Religion Literature Philosophy Art
60. Summary: Level of Immersion
• Users spend the most time in music (M) and
history books (C, D, E, F)
• Users examine a lot of pages in art books (N)
but spend a relatively small amount of time
(a lot like technology (T))
62. There are many ways to measure use
• Difference from predicted use
• Depth vs breadth
– Books used a lot vs a lot of books used
• Type of use (session, view, download)
• Amount of use per session
63.
64. Page Views Per Session: A&H
24.00
23.00
22.00
21.00
20.00
19.00
18.00
17.00
20.59
Art Music History Literature Languages Philosophy Religion
65. Minutes Per Session: A&H
14.00
12.00
10.00
8.00
6.00
4.00
2.00
0.00
10.03
History Music Languages Religion Literature Philosophy Art
66. How do we use these observations
to build better collections and
better serve our users?
67. Thank You
Michael Levine-Clark
Associate Dean for Scholarly Communication and
Collections Services
University of Denver Libraries
michael.levine-clark@du.edu
http://www.slideshare.net/MichaelLevineClark
Notes de l'éditeur
Ebrary titles viewed. X axis is percentage of titles used at least once. Y axis is average level of use of those titles.
Ebrary titles viewed. X axis is percentage of titles used at least once. Y axis is average level of use of those titles.
Ebrary titles viewed. X axis is percentage of titles used at least once. Y axis is average level of use of those titles.
Ebrary titles viewed. X axis is percentage of titles used at least once. Y axis is average level of use of those titles.
Ebrary titles viewed. X axis is percentage of titles used at least once. Y axis is average level of use of those titles.
Ebrary titles viewed. X axis is percentage of titles used at least once. Y axis is average level of use of those titles.