1. What is Strategy?
The Michael Porter Perspective
Michael McDermott
www.strategycapstone.ning.com
2. Who is Michael Porter?
• He is a Harvard Business School Professor
• He is regarded as “the” guru on business
strategy
• Profile of Michael Porter
McDermottm1@nku.edu
2
3. What is Strategy?
• Strategy is competitive position
• And competitive position demands
determining the company’s choice of generic
strategy
• It is essential that you understand this basic
but vital concept of generic strategy
McDermottm1@nku.edu
3
4. Establishing Competitive Advantage
• A company can outperform rivals only if it can
establish a difference that it can preserve
• It must therefore:
1. Deliver greater value to customers; or
2. Create comparable value at lower prices; or
3. Do both
McDermottm1@nku.edu
4
5. Some Key Questions in Strategy
Development
Who/what are we?
The focus here is on choice of Generic Strategy
–
Where do we want to be?
The focus here is on choice of Generic Strategy
–
Why do we want to go there?
The focus here is upon strategy drivers
–
•
•
•
•
PEST Analysis
Competitor Analysis
Market Analysis
Internal Analysis
How will we get there?
–
The focus here is upon choice of Grand Strategy
McDermottm1@nku.edu
5
6. 1. Who/what are we?
This is our competitive position –
some would argue that this is the
essence of our strategy
McDermottm1@nku.edu
6
11. Determining Strategic Position
• Choose a different set of activities
• Perform similar activities differently
Activities • Or perform different activities
Value
• Deliver a unique mix of value
McDermottm1@nku.edu
11
12. Nature of Strategic Positioning
• Means performing different activities from
rivals or performing similar activities in
different ways
• Competitive advantage requires developing a
distinct strategic position
McDermottm1@nku.edu
12
13. Choice of Generic Strategy
Internal
Considerations
External
Considerations
• Do we compete on low cost
or differentiation?
• What is our target market?
• What industry do we
compete in?
McDermottm1@nku.edu
13
17. Choice of Generic Strategy:
Abercrombie and Fitch
Internal
Considerations
External
Considerations
• Differentiation?
• Agreed?
• Is it the clothes market?
• Or designer clothes for
mature adolescents and
young adults?
McDermottm1@nku.edu
17
18. Choice of Generic Strategy:
Abercrombie and Fitch
The Clothes Market
The Designer Young Adult
Market
• Then A&F competes
through focused
differentiation
• Then A&F competes
through differentiation
McDermottm1@nku.edu
18
19. According to Porter, Strategy
involves trade-offs.
The essence of strategy is
choosing what not to do.
21. Strategy is the creation of a
unique and valuable position,
involving a different set of
activities.
22. “Commonly the threats to strategy are
seen to emanate from outside a
company because of changes in
technology or the behavior of
competitors. Although external changes
can be the problem, the greater threat
to strategy often comes from within”.
Michael Porter
23. Porter’s Focus is Competition
• Porter’s perspective is all about establishing a
competitive position that is different from
rivals
• Either being the cost leader
• Or offering differentiation
McDermottm1@nku.edu
23
24. Defining Our Present Competitive
Position
This is represented in our
Mission Statement
McDermottm1@nku.edu
24
25. 2. Where do we want to be?
This is future-oriented and is
addressed in our Vision
McDermottm1@nku.edu
25
26. 2. Where do we want to be?
1. Do we wish to
change our
Strategy or our
competitive
position?
• Or simply apply
similar more
widely?
McDermottm1@nku.edu
26
27. Changes in Competitive Position:
Walmart in the USA
Status
• Today you think of Walmart
and you may think low cost
• A few years ago, you would
certainly think low cost
Evaluation
• Walmart’s sales in the USA
were declining recently and
this was allegedly due to
the company’s weaker
commitment to low costs
• This company may wants us
in the future to think ‘green’
and ‘healthy’
McDermottm1@nku.edu
27
28. Changes in US Competitive Position:
Toyota
1960s
• Focused Low cost
1980s
• Low cost
1990s
• Differentiation (introduce Lexus offers focused differentiation)
2000
• Differentiation
McDermottm1@nku.edu
28
29. Changes in Competitive Position:
Singapore Airlines
1960s-1970s
• Differentiation based on Asian service – Singapore girl
• Low crew/passenger ratio due to low labor costs
1980s
• Differentiation based on above
• Plus most modern fleet of aircraft
1990s
• Differentiation based on all of above
• Plus best in-flight entertainment, cuisine etc
McDermottm1@nku.edu
29
30. Changes in Competitive Position:
Hyundai, Samsung, LG
1960s-1970s
1980s-90s
2000s
•Low cost
•Transition
•Differentiation
McDermottm1@nku.edu
30
31. Changes in Competitive Position:
Haier (Chinese producer of white goods)
2000s
2010s
• Low Cost
• Transition to differentiation
• Has it worked (as per Samsung, LG,
2020s Acer, HTC)?
McDermottm1@nku.edu
31
32. 3. Why do we want to go there?
1. Change(s) taking place in the external
environment?
–
–
–
The macro-environment
The competitive environment
The market
2. The internal environment – i.e. Companyrelated considerations
3. Or combination of 1 and 2 above.
McDermottm1@nku.edu
32
33. 4. How will we get there?
• Organic growth
– the company growing through its own development on
new products/services;
– Market Consolidation
– Market Development
– Diversification
• External growth
–
–
–
–
Mergers and Acquisitions (Married) – very costly
Joint Ventures (Engaged) – less costly
Alliances (Dating) – no ownership stake, just partners
Licensing (social acquaintance) – low risk, payments
based upon market success
McDermottm1@nku.edu
33
34. 5. What are our main options in terms
of Grand Strategy Choice
McDermottm1@nku.edu
34
35. Choice of Grand Strategy and Ansoff’s Matrix
McDermottm1@nku.edu
35