The document introduces the Post-Sustainability Trilemma (PST) framework for understanding environmental politics. PST argues that the three policy goals of economic growth, public participation, and environmental protection cannot be achieved simultaneously. Only two goals can be attained at once. The three possible combinations are: 1) economic growth and participation through a techno-business as usual approach, 2) participation and environmental protection through post-growth approaches, and 3) economic growth and environmental protection through environmental authoritarianism. However, the document questions whether PST accurately describes being able to attain only two goals, as this is debatable. Considering the policy options in PST could lead to more radical conclusions around issues like degrowth, decentralization,
3. Personal Transportation
• Dense cities have a smaller per capita climate footprint
Environment Human Health Community
Chapter 6
⇧Urban areas
34%
⇧
6% Densification
• Insufficient density for effective or affordable public transit
4. Why Policy?
Tragedy of the Commons
Garret Harden, 1968 (American Ecologist)
Where a group of individuals, each acting as an individual,
share a common resource, an individual’s personal share of
profit is greater than the individual’s share of the loss. There
is incentive to consume all of the available resources.
Without regulation, cost or public transparency of
choices, there’s no incentive to hold back
Use or lose it mentality
Lack of Collective Thinking
Lec 06-01
How does this apply
to the personal
automobile?
5. Why Policy?
Tragedy of the Commons
Garret Harden, 1968 (American Ecologist)
Where a group of individuals, each acting as an individual,
share a common resource, an individual’s personal share of
profit is greater than the individual’s share of the loss. There
is incentive to consume all of the available resources.
Without regulation, cost or public transparency of
choices, there’s no incentive to hold back
Use or lose it mentality
Lack of Collective Thinking
Lec 06-01
How does this apply
to the personal
automobile?
+ Time Saved
+ Convenience
+ Comfort
- Congestion
- Air pollution
- Loss of Community
Individual Drives Car Everyone else shares the loss
8. Styles of Government Intervention
Early stage intervention
Framing, piloting and market
forming
Scaling, mainstreaming and
market building
Moving in mature markets and
policy ecosystems
Collaborator
Work with others to build
evidence and develop
ideas
Champion
Build a case for change and retain
alliances for action
Convening power
Draw together expertise from across
the system
Connecting networks
Encourage government, experts, and
citizens can co-create change
Co-producing
Co-deliver by steering different
actors from across the system to
deliver outcomes
Steward
Steer a sector through
influence and information
Agenda setting
Build awareness and confidence in
new opportunities by providing
thought leadership
Strategy and skills planning
Prepare for changing demands and
consequences of change
Educating and informing
Ensure regulation is sufficiently
available to them
Collaborating
Provide platforms for citizens to
protect vested rights and interests
Consumer
Buy goods and commission
services
Catalyst
Review, identify and prioritize key
opportunities with strategic value
Standard setting
Develop standards for data collection
and presentation
User centred commissioner
Understand citizen needs and
contract services that deliver best
impact
Leverage buying power
Utilize public procurement to
encourage investment, innovation,
and protect consumer rights
Provider
Design, provide and modify
public services
Innovator
Create test beds, sandboxes, and
trials in real world settings
Service redesign
Establish legitimacy for more human-
centred services, harnessing political
will for change
Service provider
Provide services directly or indirectly
through funding and target setting
Choice architect
behaviour so that the
default is both attractive and easy
Funder
Stimulate or lead
investment
Early adopter
Invest in the exploration of new
opportunities with strategic value
Fiscal incentives
Direct finance to stimulate new
thinking that can drive future
opportunities
Grants and subsidies
Encourage behaviour change
through grants or other incentives
Platform provision
Scale up proven ideas through
existing infrastructure and public
services
Regulator
Regulate a sector and
coordinate enforcement
Encourage voluntary codes
Self-regulation, without legislating,
allowing for greater flexibility
Governance
Ensure regulation supports the
conditions for change and delivers
the policy intent
Building a regulatory environment
Ensure regulation enables the
intended policy outcomes
Compliance
Support enforcement and harmonize
regulatory compliance environment
Legislator
Make laws and amend
legislation
Green papers
Publish proposals for discussion with
stakeholders and the public
White papers and draft bills
Publish proposals for consultation
and pre-legislative scrutiny
Primary and secondary law
Support a bill through parliament and
enact legislation
Amend rules
Statutory instruments: rules, orders,
created by delegated authorities
Adapted from UK Policy Lab
UK Policy Lab
Lec 06-01
Miller’s entire book reflects many different “levers” that
can be used by government and planners
9. Buy goods and commission
services
Review, identify and prioritize key
opportunities with strategic value
Develop standards for data coll
and presentation
Provider
Design, provide and modify
public services
Innovator
Create test beds, sandboxes, and
trials in real world settings
Service redesign
Establish legitimacy for more hu
centred services, harnessing po
will for change
Funder
Stimulate or lead
investment
Early adopter
Invest in the exploration of new
opportunities with strategic value
Fiscal incentives
Direct finance to stimulate n
thinking that can drive futur
opportunities
Regulator
Regulate a sector and
coordinate enforcement
Encourage voluntary codes
Self-regulation, without legislating,
allowing for greater flexibility
Governance
Ensure regulation supports
conditions for change and del
the policy intent
Legislator
Make laws and amend
Green papers
Publish proposals for discussion with
stakeholders and the public
White papers and draft bi
Publish proposals for consulta
and pre-legislative scrutin
10. available to them
ndard setting
dards for data collection
presentation
User centred commissioner
Understand citizen needs and
contract services that deliver best
impact
Leverage buying power
Utilize public procurement to
encourage investment, innovation,
and protect consumer rights
vice redesign
imacy for more human-
es, harnessing political
l for change
Service provider
Provide services directly or indirectly
through funding and target setting
Choice architect
behaviour so that the
default is both attractive and easy
al incentives
nce to stimulate new
hat can drive future
pportunities
Grants and subsidies
Encourage behaviour change
through grants or other incentives
Platform provision
Scale up proven ideas through
existing infrastructure and public
services
overnance
gulation supports the
r change and delivers
policy intent
Building a regulatory environment
Ensure regulation enables the
intended policy outcomes
Compliance
Support enforcement and harmonize
regulatory compliance environment
11. Congestion Tax
• Introduced in London in 2003
• Ecotax reinvested in transit
• Reduces traffic in the centre
• Some exemptions and
discounts are offered
• Increased transit services
15. Self-Driving Cars
Commuting becomes
productive time, robo-taxis
run errands, quick delivery
of goods
Significant
increase in
emissions
Unless they are
electric, plug into
green energy grid,
make transit easy
BNN Bloomberg
Encourage
urban sprawl
and more roads
18. An Imagined Plane of Ethical Reasoning Space
Beneficence
Nonmaleficence
Autonomy
Justice
The better a
decision, the more
space is filled
Harm
and
Benefit
axis
Stakeholder Impact axis
19. An Imagined Plane of Ethical Reasoning Space
Beneficence
Nonmaleficence
Autonomy
Justice
The better a
decision, the more
space is filled
Harm
and
Benefit
axis
Stakeholder Impact axis
Is there validity to the
human rights
complaint?
26. The post-sustainability trilemma
Umberto Mario Sconfienza
Cluster of Excellence “Normative Orders”, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
ABSTRACT
The paper introduces the Post-Sustainability Trilemma (PST) and argues that it
provides a novel description of current environmental politics which is alternative
to the one provided by the narrative of sustainability. According to PST, the three
policy goals of (i) economic growth, (ii) participation, and (iii) environmental
protection cannot be simultaneously attained. Only two of these could. The three
possible combinations of PST are then analysed: (i)–(ii) techno business-as-usual;
(ii)–(iii) post-growth approaches; (i)–(iii) environmental authoritarianism. Finally, the
paper questions whether and under what conditions PST stands. That at least two
policy goals could be obtained is a debatable, and debated, claim. In this sense, PST
might be considered an over-optimistic framework to organise environmental
politics. These considerations open up a space to argue that, given the set of policy
possibilities offered by PST, more radical conclusions – such as radical degrowth,
radical decentralisation or, even, uncivilisation – might follow.
ARTICLE HISTORY
Received 28 January 2019
Accepted 14 August 2019
KEYWORDS
Authoritarianism; degrowth;
democracy; environment;
geoengineering; trilemma
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY & PLANNING
2019, VOL. 21, NO. 6, 769–784
https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2019.1673156
27. The post-sustainability trilemma
Umberto Mario Sconfienza
Cluster of Excellence “Normative Orders”, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
ABSTRACT
The paper introduces the Post-Sustainability Trilemma (PST) and argues that it
provides a novel description of current environmental politics which is alternative
to the one provided by the narrative of sustainability. According to PST, the three
policy goals of (i) economic growth, (ii) participation, and (iii) environmental
protection cannot be simultaneously attained. Only two of these could. The three
possible combinations of PST are then analysed: (i)–(ii) techno business-as-usual;
(ii)–(iii) post-growth approaches; (i)–(iii) environmental authoritarianism. Finally, the
paper questions whether and under what conditions PST stands. That at least two
policy goals could be obtained is a debatable, and debated, claim. In this sense, PST
might be considered an over-optimistic framework to organise environmental
politics. These considerations open up a space to argue that, given the set of policy
possibilities offered by PST, more radical conclusions – such as radical degrowth,
radical decentralisation or, even, uncivilisation – might follow.
ARTICLE HISTORY
Received 28 January 2019
Accepted 14 August 2019
KEYWORDS
Authoritarianism; degrowth;
democracy; environment;
geoengineering; trilemma
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY & PLANNING
2019, VOL. 21, NO. 6, 769–784
https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2019.1673156
Offers a framework to help us understand our
approach to environmental decision-making
Offers a “wider architecture of
choices” for policy makers
PST is a heuristic
Doesn’t prioritize one
approach - not prescriptive
30. Three Pillars of Sustainable Development
e
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
p
r
o
t
e
c
t
i
o
n
e
c
o
n
o
m
i
c
g
r
o
w
t
h
p
a
r
t
i
c
i
p
a
t
o
r
y
g
o
v
e
r
n
a
n
c
e
31. Three Pillars of Sustainable Development
e
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
p
r
o
t
e
c
t
i
o
n
e
c
o
n
o
m
i
c
g
r
o
w
t
h
p
a
r
t
i
c
i
p
a
t
o
r
y
g
o
v
e
r
n
a
n
c
e
“Current environmental politics is best
understood not as an attempt to realize the
three policy goals of sustainable development
but, rather, by the impossibility of it”
32. Three Pillars of the Sustainable Development Narrative
e
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
p
r
o
t
e
c
t
i
o
n
e
c
o
n
o
m
i
c
g
r
o
w
t
h
p
a
r
t
i
c
i
p
a
t
o
r
y
g
o
v
e
r
n
a
n
c
e
What if we can only have two?
post-growth
environmental
authoritarianism
33. • political institutions only “provide the conditions for the
individuals to pursue what is valuable to them”
↳ governments “create the conditions for
markets to work freely and efficiently”
environmental care depends
on people’s “tastes”
“tastes” for environmental quality are
likely to emerge after other needs are
satisfied (and too late)
34. • political institutions only “provide the conditions for the
individuals to pursue what is valuable to them”
↳ governments “create the conditions for
markets to work freely and efficiently”
environmental care depends
on people’s “tastes”
“tastes” for environmental quality are
likely to emerge after other needs are
satisfied (and too late)
Short-term market or
political gain can outweigh
longterm concerns
Other factors (e.g.
poverty or greed) may
curtail action Small incremental changes
but not transformative
policies
35. “These are called Carbon Dioxide Removal (CDR)
technologies, of which bioenergy with carbon capture and
storage (BECCS) is currently the most popular. Technological
fixes represent the acknowledgement that our democratic
institutions, while they have proven to be too valuable to be
discarded just yet, might make our societies addicted to
carbon consumption too slow to react.”
Can economic and technological advancements
lead to environmental protection?
BECCS may have other environmental impacts
Relies on large technological leaps
36.
37. Reflecting solar radiation back to space
Uncertainties about impact might cause conflict
Functions at planetary level and needs
autocratic governance
38. environmental
authoritarianism
“The idea is that political participation might manifest itself in a set of choices
which, when aggregated at the social level, might impact negatively on the
environment. When it happens, participation needs to be curtailed.”
Legitimizes authoritarian
governments
Democratic societies can’t
impose limits effectively
Small group of decision
makers is more effective
Restricting participation: electing government,
political participation, free market economy
39. • Markets already require rules
provided by governments
• “Private actions” like eating meat
and driving, when aggregated,
impinge on global ecosystems
and human rights
Meeting targets may mean rolling black-outs,
factory shut-downs, limits on citizen activity
Miller’s suggests a comprehensive
legislative framework
environmental
authoritarianism
40. • Absolute decoupling between material consumption and GDP
cannot be realized
Critique of Environmental Authoritarianism
After accounting for easy efficiency improvements,
protection and growth might be incompatible.
• Restraining economic planning may undermine innovation and
result in efficiency If you’re still committed to economic growth!
• Dissatisfaction might lead to resentment and civil unrest
• Public engagement encourages the adoption of measures and
acts as a tool for the inclusion of marginalized groups
41. Is Green Growth Possible?
Jason Hickela
and Giorgos Kallisb
a
Anthropology, Goldsmiths, University of London, London, UK; <j.hickel@gold.ac.uk>
b
ICREA and ICTA-UAB, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
ABSTRACT
The notion of green growth has emerged as a dominant policy response to climate change and
ecological breakdown. Green growth theory asserts that continued economic expansion is
compatible with our planet’s ecology, as technological change and substitution will allow us to
absolutely decouple GDP growth from resource use and carbon emissions. This claim is now
assumed in national and international policy, including in the Sustainable Development Goals. But
empirical evidence on resource use and carbon emissions does not support green growth theory.
Examining relevant studies on historical trends and model-based projections, we find that: (1) there
is no empirical evidence that absolute decoupling from resource use can be achieved on a global
scale against a background of continued economic growth, and (2) absolute decoupling from carbon
emissions is highly unlikely to be achieved at a rate rapid enough to prevent global warming over
1.5°C or 2°C, even under optimistic policy conditions. We conclude that green growth is likely to be
a misguided objective, and that policymakers need to look toward alternative strategies.
42. Is Green Growth Possible?
Jason Hickela
and Giorgos Kallisb
a
Anthropology, Goldsmiths, University of London, London, UK; <j.hickel@gold.ac.uk>
b
ICREA and ICTA-UAB, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
ABSTRACT
The notion of green growth has emerged as a dominant policy response to climate change and
ecological breakdown. Green growth theory asserts that continued economic expansion is
compatible with our planet’s ecology, as technological change and substitution will allow us to
absolutely decouple GDP growth from resource use and carbon emissions. This claim is now
assumed in national and international policy, including in the Sustainable Development Goals. But
empirical evidence on resource use and carbon emissions does not support green growth theory.
Examining relevant studies on historical trends and model-based projections, we find that: (1) there
is no empirical evidence that absolute decoupling from resource use can be achieved on a global
scale against a background of continued economic growth, and (2) absolute decoupling from carbon
emissions is highly unlikely to be achieved at a rate rapid enough to prevent global warming over
1.5°C or 2°C, even under optimistic policy conditions. We conclude that green growth is likely to be
a misguided objective, and that policymakers need to look toward alternative strategies.
Emphasizes
environmental protection
Meet needs within means
Curbs material desires and explores
other means of “human flourishing”
47. The Problem with Continuous Growth
What is the problem
with this curve?
48. The Problem with Continuous Growth
What is the problem
with this curve?
It matches
resource use
49. The Problem with Continuous Growth
What is the problem
with this curve?
It matches
resource use
… and when
they run out
50. “Green growth requires absolute decoupling of GDP
from resource use and environmental impact. ... It is
not enough to simply ‘minimize’ environmental impact
– we must rapidly reduce it down to safe limits.”
The Conditions of Green Growth
H&K begin with “green growth” (which Sconfienza
will call “the narrative of sustainability”)
Resource Use Carbon Emissions
Week 07-02
51. “Green growth requires absolute decoupling of GDP
from resource use and environmental impact. ... It is
not enough to simply ‘minimize’ environmental impact
– we must rapidly reduce it down to safe limits.”
The Conditions of Green Growth
H&K begin with “green growth” (which Sconfienza
will call “the narrative of sustainability”)
Resource Use Carbon Emissions
Week 07-02
For the global economy to continue to
grow it MUST decouple growth from
resource use and emissions
52. services … but there is no historical evidence that switching to services will, in and of itself, reduce
the material throughput of the global economy.
Figure 2. (a) Global material footprint, 1970–2013; (b) Change in global material footprint compared to change
in global GDP (constant 2010 USD), 1990–2013. Source: Materialflows.net/World Bank.
A second argument is that technological innovation and government policy might drive
Week 07-02
53. services … but there is no historical evidence that switching to services will, in and of itself, reduce
the material throughput of the global economy.
Figure 2. (a) Global material footprint, 1970–2013; (b) Change in global material footprint compared to change
in global GDP (constant 2010 USD), 1990–2013. Source: Materialflows.net/World Bank.
A second argument is that technological innovation and government policy might drive
Week 07-02
… but that is not possible
54. “Sustainable degrowth can be defined from an
ecological–economic perspective as a socially
sustainable and equitable reduction (and eventually
stabilisation) of society's throughput. Throughput
refers to the materials and energy a society extracts,
processes, transports and distributes, to consume
and return back to the environment as waste.”
What is Degrowth?
Giorgios Kallis, “In Defence of Degrowth” (2011)
“Sustainable degrowth” is one of two
possibilities (according to Kallis); the
other is “cataclysmic degrowth”
Week 07-02
55. services … but there is no historical evidence that switching to services will, in and of itself, reduce
the material throughput of the global economy.
Figure 2. (a) Global material footprint, 1970–2013; (b) Change in global material footprint compared to change
in global GDP (constant 2010 USD), 1990–2013. Source: Materialflows.net/World Bank.
A second argument is that technological innovation and government policy might drive
2040
Desired
How then, do we do sustainable degrowth?
56. services … but there is no historical evidence that switching to services will, in and of itself, reduce
the material throughput of the global economy.
Figure 2. (a) Global material footprint, 1970–2013; (b) Change in global material footprint compared to change
in global GDP (constant 2010 USD), 1990–2013. Source: Materialflows.net/World Bank.
A second argument is that technological innovation and government policy might drive
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
…
b
u
t
t
h
e
r
e
i
s
n
o
h
i
s
t
o
r
i
c
a
l
e
v
i
d
e
n
c
e
t
h
a
t
s
w
i
t
c
h
i
n
g
t
o
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
w
i
l
l
,
i
n
a
n
d
o
f
i
t
s
e
l
f
t
h
e
m
a
t
e
r
i
a
l
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
p
u
t
o
f
t
h
e
g
l
o
b
a
l
e
c
o
n
o
m
y
.
F
i
g
u
r
e
2
.
(
a
)
G
l
o
b
a
l
m
a
t
e
r
i
a
l
f
o
o
t
p
r
i
n
t
,
1
9
7
0
–
2
0
1
3
;
(
b
)
C
h
a
n
g
e
i
n
g
l
o
b
a
l
m
a
t
e
r
i
a
l
f
o
o
t
p
r
i
n
t
c
o
m
p
a
r
e
d
t
i
n
g
l
o
b
a
l
G
D
P
(
c
o
n
s
t
a
n
t
2
0
1
0
U
S
D
)
,
1
9
9
0
–
2
0
1
3
.
S
o
u
r
c
e
:
M
a
t
e
r
i
a
l
f
l
o
w
s
.
n
e
t
/
W
o
r
l
d
B
a
n
k
.
A
s
e
c
o
n
d
a
r
g
u
m
e
n
t
i
s
t
h
a
t
t
e
c
h
n
o
l
o
g
i
c
a
l
i
n
n
o
v
a
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
g
o
v
e
r
n
m
e
n
t
p
o
l
i
c
y
m
i
g
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
…
b
u
t
t
h
e
r
e
i
s
n
o
h
i
s
t
o
r
i
c
a
l
e
v
i
d
e
n
c
e
t
h
a
t
s
w
i
t
c
h
i
n
g
t
o
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
w
i
l
l
,
i
n
a
n
d
o
t
h
e
m
a
t
e
r
i
a
l
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
p
u
t
o
f
t
h
e
g
l
o
b
a
l
e
c
o
n
o
m
y
.
F
i
g
u
r
e
2
.
(
a
)
G
l
o
b
a
l
m
a
t
e
r
i
a
l
f
o
o
t
p
r
i
n
t
,
1
9
7
0
–
2
0
1
3
;
(
b
)
C
h
a
n
g
e
i
n
g
l
o
b
a
l
m
a
t
e
r
i
a
l
f
o
o
t
p
r
i
n
t
c
o
m
i
n
g
l
o
b
a
l
G
D
P
(
c
o
n
s
t
a
n
t
2
0
1
0
U
S
D
)
,
1
9
9
0
–
2
0
1
3
.
S
o
u
r
c
e
:
M
a
t
e
r
i
a
l
f
l
o
w
s
.
n
e
t
/
W
o
r
l
d
B
a
n
k
.
A
s
e
c
o
n
d
a
r
g
u
m
e
n
t
i
s
t
h
a
t
t
e
c
h
n
o
l
o
g
i
c
a
l
i
n
n
o
v
a
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
g
o
v
e
r
n
m
e
n
t
p
o
l
i
c
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
…
b
u
t
t
h
e
r
e
i
s
n
o
h
i
s
t
o
r
i
c
a
l
e
v
i
d
e
n
c
e
t
h
a
t
s
w
i
t
c
h
i
n
g
t
o
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
w
i
l
l
,
i
n
a
t
h
e
m
a
t
e
r
i
a
l
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
p
u
t
o
f
t
h
e
g
l
o
b
a
l
e
c
o
n
o
m
y
.
F
i
g
u
r
e
2
.
(
a
)
G
l
o
b
a
l
m
a
t
e
r
i
a
l
f
o
o
t
p
r
i
n
t
,
1
9
7
0
–
2
0
1
3
;
(
b
)
C
h
a
n
g
e
i
n
g
l
o
b
a
l
m
a
t
e
r
i
a
l
f
o
o
t
p
r
i
n
t
i
n
g
l
o
b
a
l
G
D
P
(
c
o
n
s
t
a
n
t
2
0
1
0
U
S
D
)
,
1
9
9
0
–
2
0
1
3
.
S
o
u
r
c
e
:
M
a
t
e
r
i
a
l
f
l
o
w
s
.
n
e
t
/
W
o
r
l
d
B
A
s
e
c
o
n
d
a
r
g
u
m
e
n
t
i
s
t
h
a
t
t
e
c
h
n
o
l
o
g
i
c
a
l
i
n
n
o
v
a
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
g
o
v
e
r
n
m
e
n
t
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
…
b
u
t
t
h
e
r
e
i
s
n
o
h
i
s
t
o
r
i
c
a
l
e
v
i
d
e
n
c
e
t
h
a
t
s
w
i
t
c
h
i
n
g
t
o
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
w
i
l
l
,
t
h
e
m
a
t
e
r
i
a
l
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
p
u
t
o
f
t
h
e
g
l
o
b
a
l
e
c
o
n
o
m
y
.
F
i
g
u
r
e
2
.
(
a
)
G
l
o
b
a
l
m
a
t
e
r
i
a
l
f
o
o
t
p
r
i
n
t
,
1
9
7
0
–
2
0
1
3
;
(
b
)
C
h
a
n
g
e
i
n
g
l
o
b
a
l
m
a
t
e
r
i
a
l
f
o
o
i
n
g
l
o
b
a
l
G
D
P
(
c
o
n
s
t
a
n
t
2
0
1
0
U
S
D
)
,
1
9
9
0
–
2
0
1
3
.
S
o
u
r
c
e
:
M
a
t
e
r
i
a
l
f
l
o
w
s
.
n
e
t
/
W
o
A
s
e
c
o
n
d
a
r
g
u
m
e
n
t
i
s
t
h
a
t
t
e
c
h
n
o
l
o
g
i
c
a
l
i
n
n
o
v
a
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
g
o
v
e
r
n
m
e
2040
We need a rapid reduction in
Fossil Fuels use
Desired
How then, do we do sustainable degrowth?
… and overall consumption,
especially in WEIRD countries
59. Cut Advertising
End planned
obsolescence
Shift from ownership
to usership
End food waste
1
2
3
4
capitalism should encourage rational
efficiency, but it doesn’t because long-
lasting devices impede profits
Ads work, so we should cut ads.
Paris has banned ads near schools
e.g. usership of cars encourages
companies to take responsibility
50% of food ends as waste. We could cut
agriculture in half if we stopped waste
Jason Hickel’s “Pathways to a Post-Capitalist World”*
60. Scale down ecologically
destructive industries
Account for
human cost
Reduce inequality
Decommodify public goods
6
7
8
Jason Hickel’s “Pathways to a Post-Capitalist World”*
5
61. Scale down ecologically
destructive industries
Account for
human cost
Reduce inequality
Decommodify public goods
6
7
8
Tax beef—it uses 60% of farm land
Cut business class travel
shorten work week — if US cut week to same as
W.Europe, it would reduce energy consumption by 20%
reduced unemployment, increased quality of life, and reduced environmental pressures
Maximum wage. Cap CEO wage to
worker wage at 10:1 ratio. Tax wealth
Free education, Universal Basic Income, Universal Basic Services
Jason Hickel’s “Pathways to a Post-Capitalist World”*
5
66. The Biological Cycle
1. Keep things in service
as long as possible
2. Capture all possible
resource
3. Return biological into
the environment
67. Three Major Obstacles to the Circularity of the Biological Cycle
Failure of facilities to do consistent capture to
separate the biological from non-
Mixing of biological with non-biological
1
2
e.g. Poly-cotton blended fabric
Lack of regulation that forces producers to
take responsibility for avoiding waste
3
68. The Biological Cycle
1. Keep things in service
as long as possible
2. Capture all possible
resource
3. Return biological into
the environment
70. The Technical
Cycle
Recycling is the last resort
Refurbish often saves
80% of materials
DfX — design for maintenance,
design for repair
Sharing vs.
Ownership