SlideShare une entreprise Scribd logo
1  sur  17
Télécharger pour lire hors ligne
Chapter Three- Examples 1
Example (1): For the footing shown in the
figure, find the ultimate bearing capacity,
using Terzaghi's Eq. Assume general shear
failure.
Solution
Terzaghi's Equation; from Table (3.1) ; qult = cNcsc + ̅Nq + 0.5γBNγsγ
To choose shape factors; = >> 10;
Hence, the footing can be considered as continuous (strip); sc = sγ = 1
Bearing capacity factors, using Table (3.2); for ϕ = 25ᵒ
Nc = 25.1 , Nq = 12.7 , Nγ = 9.7
̅ = 1 × 18.2 = 18.2 kN/m2
Hence; qult = 16 × 25.1 × 1 + 18.2 × 12.7 + 0.5 × 18.2 × 1 × 9.7 × 1 = 721.01 kN/m2
Example (2): A (1.2m) square footing is
shown in the figure. Determine the gross
and net allowable load that the footing can
carry for a safety factor of (3), assuming;
a- General shear failure of soil.
b- Local shear failure of soil.
(Note: use Terzaghi's Equation)
γ = 18.2 kN/m3
c = 16 kPa
ϕ = 25 ᵒ
1
m
B =1 m , L = 20 m
γ = 17.3 kN/m3
c = 9.6 kPa
ϕ = 20 ᵒ
0.9
m
1.2 m
P
Chapter Three- Examples 2
Solution
a- General shear failure;
Terzaghi's Equation; from Table (3.1), qult = cNcsc + ́ Nq + 0.5γBNγsγ
For square footing; shape factors are; sc = 1.3 , sγ = 0.8
Bearing capacity factors, using Table (3.2); for ϕ = 20ᵒ ; Nc = 17.7 , Nq = 7.4 , Nγ = 5.0
̅ = 0.9 × 17.3 = 15.57 kPa
Hence; qult = 9.6 × 17.7 × 1.3 + 15.57 × 7.4 + 0.5 × 17.3 × 1.2 × 5.0 × 0.8 = 377.63 kPa
qa = = = 125.88 kPa
Pa = qa . Af = 125.88 × (1.2)2
= 181.27 kN
(qa)net =
̅
= = 120.69 kPa
(Pa)net = (qa)net . Af = 120.69 × (1.2)2
= 173.79 kN
b- Local shear failure;
́ = c = × 9.6 = 6.4 kPa
tan ́ = tanϕ ; ́ = ( tanϕ) = ( × tan20) = 13.6ᵒ
Bearing capacity factors, using Fig. (3.3) where ́ = 13.6ᵒ
or using Fig. (3.4) where ϕ = 20ᵒ ;
In the two cases, ́ = 11.8 , ́ = 3.9 , ́ = 1.7
qult = 6.4 × 11.8 × 1.3 + 15.57 × 3.9 + 0.5 × 17.3 × 1.2 × 1.7 × 0.8 = 173.02 kPa
qa = = = 57.67 kPa
Pa = qa . Af = 57.67 × (1.2)2
= 83.05 kN
(qa)net =
̅
= = 52.48 kPa
(Pa)net = (qa)net . Af = 52.48 × (1.2)2
= 57.57 kN
Chapter Three- Examples 3
Example (3): A circular footing is shown
in the figure, determine the allowable load
that the footing can carry with safety
factor of (3), using Meyerhof's bearing
capacity equation.
Solution
Meyerhof's Equation for vertical load; from Table (3.1);
qult = cNcscdc + ̅Nqsqdq + 0.5γBNγsγdγ
since c = 0, hence; qult = ̅Nqsqdq + 0.5γBNγsγdγ
Since the footing is circular, no adjustment is required for ϕ
̅ = 0.61 × 18.08 + 0.61 × (21.07 - 9.8) = 17.9 kPa
Bearing capacity factors, using Table (3.4); for ϕ = 32ᵒ
Nq = 23.2
Nγ = 22.0
Shape and depth factors; from Table (3.3);
sq = sγ = 1 + 0.1Kp
Kp = tan2
(45 + ) = tan2
(45 + ) = 3.255
sq = sγ = 1 + 0.1 × 3.255 × = 1.325
dq = dγ = 1 + 0.1 √ = 1 + 0.1 √ × = 1.18
qult = 17.9 × 23.2 × 1.325 × 1.18 + 0.5 × (21.07-9.8) × 1.22 ×22.0 × 1.325 ×1.18
= 855.52 kPa
qa = = = 285.17 kPa
Pa = qa . Af = 285.17 × (1.22)2
= 333.36 kN
γst = 21.07 kN/m3
0.61
m
1.22 m
0.61
m
γ = 18.08 kN/m3
c = 0 kPa
ϕ = 32 ᵒ
W.T.
P
Chapter Three- Examples 4
Example (4) (H.W.): Find the
ultimate B.C. for the continuous
footing shown for different locations
of W.T. (Using Terzaghi equation)
Solution
qult = cNcsc + ̅Nq + 0.5γBNγsγ
For strip (continuous) footing; (Table 3.1)
Sc = Sγ = 1
position (a);
for the 3rd term ; γ = ́ = 0 . = 10.19 kN/m3
̅ = 2 × 10.19 = 20.38 kN/m2
qult = 0 + 20.38 × 36.5 + 0.5 × 10.19 × 1 × 36.0 × 1 = 927.29 kN/m2
position (b);
for the 3rd erm ; γ = ́ = 0 . = 10.19 kN/m3
̅ = 1 × 20 + 1 × 0 . = 30.19 kN/m2
qult = 0 + 30.19 × 36.5 + 0.5 × 10.19 × 1 × 36.0 × 1 = 1285.36 kN/m2
position (c);
for the 3rd erm ; γ = ́ = 0 . = 10.19 kN/m3
̅ = 2 × 20 = 40 kN/m2
qult = 0 + 40 × 36.5 + 0.5 × 10.19 × 1 × 36.0 × 1 = 1643.42 kN/m2
position (d);
for the 3rd erm; γ = γ
̅ = γ γ γ = 10.19 + = 15.1 kN/m3
̅ = 2 × 20 = 40 kN/m2
qult = 0 + 40 × 36.5 + 0.5 × 15.1 × 1 × 36.0 × 1 = 1731.8 kN/m2
γt = γsat = 20.0 kN/m3
1 m
Sand
ϕ = 34 ᵒ
Nq = 36.5
Nγ = 36.0
1.0
m
0.5
m
(b) W.T.
(c) W.T.
1.0
m
γw = 9.81 kN/m3
(d) W.T.
(a) W.T.
Chapter Three- Examples 5
Example (5) (H.W.): For the continuous
footing shown, use Meyerhof bearing
capacity equation to find the ultimate
B.C. and the width of footing (B), taking
(F = 2.5).
Solution
For  = 0
Nc = 5.14 , Nq = 1 , Nγ = 0
So; qult = c Nc sc dc + ̅ sq dq
Shape factors; Sc = 1 ( = 0)
Sq = 1 ( = 0)
depth factors; dc = 1 + 0.2 √ = 1 + 0.2 × 1 × = 1 +
dq = 1 ( = 0)
qult = 100 × 5.14 × 1 × (1 + ) + (1 × 18) × 1 ×1 = 514 (1 + ) + 18
(qult)net = qult ̅ = 514 (1 + ) + 18 18 = 514 (1 + )
(qa)net = = = 205.6 (1 + )
Q = (qa)net × B
600 = 205.6 (1 + ) × B
B = 2.72m
qult = 514 (1 + ) + 18 = 569.8 kN/m2
γsat = 18.0 kN/m3
1.0
m
B
0.5
m γsat = 20. 8 kN/m3
c = 100 kPa
ϕ = 0 ᵒ
W.T.
Q = 600 kN/m
Chapter Three- Examples 6
Example (6) (H.W.): A (0.75 m × 1.5 m )
rectangular footing is shown in the figure.
Determine the magnitude of the ultimate
load (Pult) applied eccentrically for bearing
failure in the supporting soil. Use the
general bearing capacity equation.
Solution
Hansen's Equation; from Table (3.1);
qult = cNcscdcicgcbc + ̅Nqsqdqiqgqbq + 0.5γ ́ Nγsγdγiγgγbγ
since c = 0, hence; qult = ̅Nqsqdqiqgqbq + 0.5γ ́ Nγsγdγiγgγbγ
iq = gq = bq = iγ = gγ = bγ = 1
Bearing capacity factors, using Table (3.4); for ϕ = 30ᵒ ; Nq = 18.4 , Nγ = 15.1
́ = L – 2ey= 1.5 – 2 × 0.12 = 1.26 m
́ = B – 2ex = 0.75 – 2 × 0.06 = 0.63 m
Shape and depth factors; from Table (3.5);
dq = 1 + 2 tan ϕ (1 – sin ϕ)2
= 1 + 2 tan30 (1 – sin 30)2
= 1.231
dγ = 1
sq = 1 +
́
́
tan ϕ = 1 + tan 30 = 1.289
sγ = 1 – 0.4
́
́
= 1 – 0.4 × = 0.8
̅ = 0.6 × 18.08 = 10.85 kPa
qult = 10.85 × 18.4 × 1.289 × 1.231 + 0.5 × 18.08 × 0.63 × 15.1 × 0.8 × 1 = 385.58 kPa
Pult = qult × Af = 385.58 × 0.63 × 1.26 = 306.07 kN
1.5
m
0.06 m
0.12
m
γ = 18.08 kN/m3
c = 0 kPa
ϕ = 30 ᵒ
0.75 m
×
0.6
m
Chapter Three- Examples 7
Example (7): for the rectangular
footing shown find the allowable
bearing capacity and the factor of
safety using Hansen's equation.
Use the following data;
P = 3000 kN , Mx = 600 kN.m ,
My = 1500 kN.m , c = 0 ,
tri = 30o
, γ = 16 kN/m3
,
γsat = 18.8 kN/m3
Solution
ex = = = 0
ey = = = 0.2 m
e = = 3.6 m
e = = 6 m
γ γ γ = = 8.99 m
̅ = = 12.5 kN/m3
̅ Df = 16 × 1.5 = 24 kN/m2
N-factors; for  = 30o
[from Table 3.4] ; Nq = 18.4 , Nγ = 15.1
Shape factors; From table (3.5)
tan = tan30 = 1.35
1.5
m
2.0
m
W.T.
P
2.0
m
2.0
m
2.5 m 3.5 m
x
y
Mx
My
Mx , My
Chapter Three- Examples 8
= = 0.76
depth factors; From table (3.5)
tan (1 sin)2
= 1 + 2 tan30 (1 – sin30)2
× = 1.11
dγ = 1
since B ˃ ; hence = = 0.936
other factors; iq = iγ = gq = gγ = bq = bγ = 1
qult = cNcscdc + ̅Nqsqdq + 0.5γ ́ Nγsγdγrγ
= 24 × 18.4 × 1.35 × 1.11 + 0.5 × 12.5 × 3.6 × 15.1 × 0.76 × 1 × 0.936 = 903.42 kN/m2
̅ = 903.42 24 = 879.42 kN/m2
= = 6.33
By neglecting ( ̅ ) ;
= = 6.5
Chapter Three- Examples 9
Example (8) (H.W.): A foundation (1.5 m ×
2.0m) is located at depth (Df = 1.0 m) in a clay
layer (cu1 = 120 kPa , γ = 16.8 kN/m3
). A softer
clay layer (cu2 = 48 kPa , γ = 16.2 kN/m3
) is
located at a depth (d = 0.75 m) measured from
the bottom of the foundation. Determine the
allowable load (Pa) the foundation can carry with
a factor of safety (F = 3).
Solution
̅
= 120 kN/m2
̅ = 16.8 × 1 = 16.8 kN/m2
0.4 , b = 0.75 , 1.0
From (Fig. 3.11), Nc = 3.6
́ = = 0.15
́ = = 0.267
= 628.9 kN/m2
209.6 kN/m2
Pa = qa × B × L = 209.6 × 1.5 × 2 = 628.9 kN
d
Chapter Three- Examples 11
Example (9): Check the adequacy of the
footing shown in the figure.
Use F = 3 and γw = 10 kN/m3
).
Solution
To find γt for soil layer I, and γsat for al soil layers I, II, and III;
γt)I = γ = = 17.25 kN/m3
γsat)I = γ = × 10 = 19.4 kN/m3
In the same manner, γsat)II = 18.7 kN/m3
,
and γsat)III = 19.5 kN/m3
Assume that the effective depth equals (B = 1.5 m);
Hence; HIII = 1.5 - 0.5 = 1 m
A - Using Hansen equation with average shear parameters;
From Table (3.1) ; qult = 5.14 su (1 + ́ + ́ - ́ - ́ - ́ ) + ̅
(qult)net = 5.14 su (1 + ́ + ́ - ́ - ́ - ́ )
́ = ́ = ́ = 1 ; su = cav
cav =
∑
∑
= = 73.33 kPa
III
II
I
Soil
Property
2..2
2..2
2..
GS
0.82
0.0
0.8
e
0..1
0..0
0.12
w
80
.0
10
c ( kPa)
0
0
.2
ϕᵒ
1.2 m × 2 m
0.8
m
0.4
m
W.T
.
P = 300 kN working load
0.5
m
Soil I
Soil II
Soil III
Chapter Three- Examples 11
From Table (3.5); ́ = 0.2 = 0.2 × = 0.15
́ = 0.4 = 0.4 × = 0.32
(qult)net = 5.14 × 73.33 (1 + 0.15 + 0.32) = 554.07 kPa
(qa)net = = 184.69 kPa
(Pa)net = (qa)net × Af = 4.6 × .5 × = 554.07 kN ˃ 300 kN o.k.
B - Using Reddy and Srinivasan's Approach;
qult = cu1. Nc (1 + ́ + ́ ) + ̅
(qult)net = cu1. Nc (1 + ́ + ́ )
= = 0.67 ; = = 1.33
Hence; from Figure (3.11), Nc = 6.5
Also, ́ = 0.15 , and ́ = 0.32
(qult)net = 60 × 6.5 (1 + 0.15 + 0.32) = 573.3 kPa
(qa)net = = 191.1 kPa
(Pa)net = 191.1 × 1.5 × 2 = 573.3 kN ˃ 300 kN o.k.
Chapter Three- Examples 12
Example (10): For the soil-footing geometry shown, find the allowable bearing capacity if
(F = 2) for sand and (F = 3) for clay. Use Hansen's equation
Solution
For the sand layer,
qult = ̅Nqsqdq + 0.5γBNγsγdγ (all other factors = 1.0)
For  = 34o
, from Table (3.4) ;
Nq = 29.4
Nγ = 28.7
Shape factors; From table (3.5)
tan = tan34 = 1.67
= = 0.60
depth factors; From table (3.5)
tan (1 sin)2
= 1 + 2 tan34 (1 – sin34)2
× = 1.20
dγ = 1
qult = (1.5 × 17.25) × 29.4 × 1.67 × 1.2 + 0.5 × 17.25 × 2.0 ×28.7 × 0.60 × 1.0
= 1821.54 kN/m2
For the clay layer,
= cu1. Nc (1 + ́ + ́ ) + ̅ (all other factors = 0)
́ = = 0.2
́ = = 0.3 D ˃ B [note: in rad]
= 622.19 kN/m2
Punching contribution (per meter length)
P = ̅
B × L = 2 m × 2 m
1.5
m
W.T
.
P
0.6
m
Sand
C = 0 ,  = 34o
γ = 17.25 kN/m3
clay
su = qu/2 = 75 kPa
su = undrained shear strength
qu = unconfined shear strength
Chapter Three- Examples 13
P = (1.5 × 17.25) × 0.6 + × 17.25 × (0.6)2
= 18.63 kN/m
= 1 sin34 = 0 .44
p = 2 (L + B) = 2 (2 + 2) = 8m
Af = 2 × 2 = 4 m2
= 633.25 kN/m2
< qult = 1821.54 kN/m2
The maximum footing pressure is controlled by the clay layer giving qult = 633.25 kN/m2
qa = = = 211.10 kN/m2
Example (11): The (S.P.T.) results from a soil boring located adjacent to a planned
foundation for a proposed workhouse are shown below. If spread footings for the project
are to be found (1.2 m) below surface ground, what foundation size should be provided to
support (1800 kN) column load. Assume that (25.4 mm) settlement is tolerable. Water
table is encountered at (7.5 m). Use Peck, Hansen, and Thornburn method.
S.P.T. depth
(m)
Blow count.
Nfield
0.3 9
1.2 10
2.4 15
3.6 22
4.8 19
6 29
7.5 33
10 27
γ = 17 kN/m3
1.2
m
B
1800 kN
W.T.
7.5
m
γ́ = 10 kN/m3
Chapter Three- Examples 14
Solution
Find pressure ( ́ ᵒ ) at each depth and correct Nfield values;
depth
(m)
Blow count.
Nfield
́ ᵒ
(kPa)
́ ᵒ
(MPa)
CN
(from Fig. 2.12)
́
(Nfield × CN)
0.3 9 ---- ---- ---- -----
1.2 10 1.2 × 17 = 20.4 0.0204 1.55 15
2.4 15 2.4 × 17 = 40.8 0.0408 1.28 19
3.6 22 3.6 × 17 = 61.2 0.0612 1.15 25
4.8 19 4.8 × 17 = 81.6 0.0816 1.05 20
6 29 6 × 17 = 102 0.1020 0.95 27
7.5 33 7.5 × 17 = 127.5 0.1275 0.90 30
10 27 7.5 × 17 + 2.5 × 10 = 152.5 0.1525 0.85 23
Assume that the effective depth equals to ( B )
Try B = 2.4 m ; and take values of ́ in the influence zone to find Nav ;
Nav = 20
= = 0.5
From Figure (3.15) ; (qa)net = 0.211 MPa = 211 kPa
(qa)net = ;
L = = = 3.55 m
So, we can use (2.5 m × 3.6 m)
Chapter Three- Examples 15
Example (12): For the rectangular footing
(B × 5m), the average value of SPT
number within the footing influence zone
is Nav. = 14. Find;
(a) The corrected value of N considering
the effect of overburden pressure only.
(b) The footing width (B) and the
allowable bearing capacity using
Meyerhof approach.
Solution
́ = 18.6 × 1.5 = 27.9 kN/m2
CN = 0.77 log
́
= 0.77 log = 1.43
Nc = CN . = 1.43 × 14 = 20
Pw = DL + LL = 3000 + 1500 = 4500 kN
B
( m )
qa
from Fig. (3.16)
(kPa)
=
(kPa)
2 330 450
3 300 300
So, take B = 3m
Sand
γ = 18.6 kN/m3
1.5
m
B
DL = 3000 kN
LL = 1500 kN
G.L.
.Nav = 14
Chapter Three- Examples 16
Example (13) (H.W.): For the
square footing shown, if the
average value of the cone
resistance within the rupture zone
is qc = 8.25 MPa, find the footing
dimensions and the allowable B.C.
using Meyerhof approach for the
following two cases;
( a ) when the W.T. (5m) depth
below G.L.
( b ) when the W.T. at G.L.
Solution
Pw = DL + LL = 1000 + 500 = 1500 kN
{
r
( ) r
}
case
B
( m )
qa = ( )
(kPa)
=
(kPa)
a
2.0 218.21 375
2.5 206.98 240
3.0 199.65 166.67
2.75 202.96 198.35
b 4 0.5 (190.7) = 95.34 93.75
So, for case ( a ); B = 2.75 m
and for case ( b ); B = 4.0 m
Medium sand
( qc )av. = 8.25 MPa
5.0
m
B
DL = 1000 kN
LL = 500 kN
G.L.
W.T. (a)
W.T. (b)
Chapter Three- Examples 17
Example (14): A (1.2m × 1.2m × 0.6m) footing is placed at (1.8m) depth in a soil having
γ = 7.3 kN/m3
, ϕ = 20ᵒ, and c = 19.2 kPa). Estimate the allowable uplift force
for (F = 2.5).
Solution
To find the type of foundation; shallow or deep;
= = 1.5
From Table (3.7), to find limiting embedment ration for ϕ = 20ᵒ;
= 2.5 > 1.5
So, the footing behaves as shallow footing.
To find the ultimate uplift force for shallow rectangular footing, the equation to be used is;
Tu = c.D B + L + γ.D2
(2sf .B + L – B) Ku.tanϕ + W
From Table (3.7), for ϕ = 20ᵒ; m = 0.05, and maximum Sf = 1.12
Sf = 1 + m. = 1 + 0.05 × 1.5 = 1.075 < 1.12
Ku = Kᵒ = (1 – sinϕ) √
For normally consolidated clay; OCR = 1;
Hence; Ku = Kᵒ = (1 – sin20) √ = 0.66
W = 1.2 × 1.2 × 0.6 × 24 + (1.8 – 0.6) × 1.2 × 1.2 × 17.3 = 50.63 kN
Tu = 2 × 19.2 × 1.8 (1.2 + 1.2) + 17.3 × (1.8)2
(2 × 1.075 × 1.2 + 1.2 – 1.2) 0.66 tan20
+ 50.63 = 251.3 kN
Tall = = = 100.5 kN

Contenu connexe

Tendances

Bearing capacity estimation rocks for foundation
Bearing capacity estimation rocks for foundationBearing capacity estimation rocks for foundation
Bearing capacity estimation rocks for foundation
FajruSied
 

Tendances (20)

Geotechnical Engineering-II [Lec #13: Elastic Settlements]
Geotechnical Engineering-II [Lec #13: Elastic Settlements]Geotechnical Engineering-II [Lec #13: Elastic Settlements]
Geotechnical Engineering-II [Lec #13: Elastic Settlements]
 
Bearing capacity estimation rocks for foundation
Bearing capacity estimation rocks for foundationBearing capacity estimation rocks for foundation
Bearing capacity estimation rocks for foundation
 
Analysis of portal frame by direct stiffness method
Analysis of  portal frame by direct stiffness methodAnalysis of  portal frame by direct stiffness method
Analysis of portal frame by direct stiffness method
 
Numerical Problem and solution on Bearing Capacity ( Terzaghi and Meyerhof T...
Numerical Problem and solution on Bearing Capacity  ( Terzaghi and Meyerhof T...Numerical Problem and solution on Bearing Capacity  ( Terzaghi and Meyerhof T...
Numerical Problem and solution on Bearing Capacity ( Terzaghi and Meyerhof T...
 
Geotechnical Engineering-II [Lec #19: General Bearing Capacity Equation]
Geotechnical Engineering-II [Lec #19: General Bearing Capacity Equation]Geotechnical Engineering-II [Lec #19: General Bearing Capacity Equation]
Geotechnical Engineering-II [Lec #19: General Bearing Capacity Equation]
 
Geotechnical Engineering-I [Lec #19: Consolidation-III]
Geotechnical Engineering-I [Lec #19: Consolidation-III]Geotechnical Engineering-I [Lec #19: Consolidation-III]
Geotechnical Engineering-I [Lec #19: Consolidation-III]
 
Geotechnical Engineering-I [Lec #17: Consolidation]
Geotechnical Engineering-I [Lec #17: Consolidation]Geotechnical Engineering-I [Lec #17: Consolidation]
Geotechnical Engineering-I [Lec #17: Consolidation]
 
Lecture 3 foundation settlement
Lecture 3 foundation settlementLecture 3 foundation settlement
Lecture 3 foundation settlement
 
Unit 1 sheet pile-converted
Unit 1   sheet pile-convertedUnit 1   sheet pile-converted
Unit 1 sheet pile-converted
 
Numerical problem on bearing capacity is code terzaghi water table (usefulsea...
Numerical problem on bearing capacity is code terzaghi water table (usefulsea...Numerical problem on bearing capacity is code terzaghi water table (usefulsea...
Numerical problem on bearing capacity is code terzaghi water table (usefulsea...
 
Pile settlement-ps
Pile settlement-psPile settlement-ps
Pile settlement-ps
 
Settlement of shallow foundation
Settlement of shallow foundationSettlement of shallow foundation
Settlement of shallow foundation
 
Principles of soil dynamics 3rd edition das solutions manual
Principles of soil dynamics 3rd edition das solutions manualPrinciples of soil dynamics 3rd edition das solutions manual
Principles of soil dynamics 3rd edition das solutions manual
 
Pile foundation -Types, Advantages & Load Carrying Capacity
Pile foundation -Types, Advantages & Load Carrying CapacityPile foundation -Types, Advantages & Load Carrying Capacity
Pile foundation -Types, Advantages & Load Carrying Capacity
 
Bearing Capacity of Shallow Foundation
Bearing Capacity of Shallow FoundationBearing Capacity of Shallow Foundation
Bearing Capacity of Shallow Foundation
 
Response Spectrum
Response SpectrumResponse Spectrum
Response Spectrum
 
Consolidaton
ConsolidatonConsolidaton
Consolidaton
 
Bearing capacity_of_soil
 Bearing capacity_of_soil Bearing capacity_of_soil
Bearing capacity_of_soil
 
기초공학 - 11-2 Pile Foundations.pdf
기초공학 - 11-2 Pile Foundations.pdf기초공학 - 11-2 Pile Foundations.pdf
기초공학 - 11-2 Pile Foundations.pdf
 
Pvd Soil Consolidation Design
Pvd Soil Consolidation DesignPvd Soil Consolidation Design
Pvd Soil Consolidation Design
 

Similaire à Ch.3-Examples 3.pdf

Shallow and Deep Founation Design Calucations
Shallow and Deep Founation Design CalucationsShallow and Deep Founation Design Calucations
Shallow and Deep Founation Design Calucations
Tyler Edgington
 
(Neamen)solution manual for semiconductor physics and devices 3ed
(Neamen)solution manual for semiconductor physics and devices 3ed(Neamen)solution manual for semiconductor physics and devices 3ed
(Neamen)solution manual for semiconductor physics and devices 3ed
Kadu Brito
 
Linear circuit analysis - solution manuel (R. A. DeCarlo and P. Lin) (z-lib.o...
Linear circuit analysis - solution manuel (R. A. DeCarlo and P. Lin) (z-lib.o...Linear circuit analysis - solution manuel (R. A. DeCarlo and P. Lin) (z-lib.o...
Linear circuit analysis - solution manuel (R. A. DeCarlo and P. Lin) (z-lib.o...
Ansal Valappil
 
Diseno y-calculo-de-puentes
Diseno y-calculo-de-puentesDiseno y-calculo-de-puentes
Diseno y-calculo-de-puentes
carlos
 

Similaire à Ch.3-Examples 3.pdf (20)

Mecánica de Fluidos_Merle C. Potter, David C. Wiggert_3ed Solucionario
Mecánica de Fluidos_Merle C. Potter, David C. Wiggert_3ed SolucionarioMecánica de Fluidos_Merle C. Potter, David C. Wiggert_3ed Solucionario
Mecánica de Fluidos_Merle C. Potter, David C. Wiggert_3ed Solucionario
 
Solucionario_Felder.pdf
Solucionario_Felder.pdfSolucionario_Felder.pdf
Solucionario_Felder.pdf
 
problemas resueltos
problemas resueltosproblemas resueltos
problemas resueltos
 
Problems on bearing capacity of soil
Problems on bearing capacity of soilProblems on bearing capacity of soil
Problems on bearing capacity of soil
 
Foundationeng deep-foundations_ps
Foundationeng deep-foundations_psFoundationeng deep-foundations_ps
Foundationeng deep-foundations_ps
 
Shallow and Deep Founation Design Calucations
Shallow and Deep Founation Design CalucationsShallow and Deep Founation Design Calucations
Shallow and Deep Founation Design Calucations
 
(Neamen)solution manual for semiconductor physics and devices 3ed
(Neamen)solution manual for semiconductor physics and devices 3ed(Neamen)solution manual for semiconductor physics and devices 3ed
(Neamen)solution manual for semiconductor physics and devices 3ed
 
Sm chap01
Sm chap01Sm chap01
Sm chap01
 
Capítulo 11 (5th edition)rewrweerww
Capítulo 11 (5th edition)rewrweerwwCapítulo 11 (5th edition)rewrweerww
Capítulo 11 (5th edition)rewrweerww
 
Fc025 w5 seminar_solutions_2
Fc025 w5 seminar_solutions_2Fc025 w5 seminar_solutions_2
Fc025 w5 seminar_solutions_2
 
Roof Truss Design (By Hamza Waheed UET Lahore )
Roof Truss Design (By Hamza Waheed UET Lahore )Roof Truss Design (By Hamza Waheed UET Lahore )
Roof Truss Design (By Hamza Waheed UET Lahore )
 
Linear circuit analysis - solution manuel (R. A. DeCarlo and P. Lin) (z-lib.o...
Linear circuit analysis - solution manuel (R. A. DeCarlo and P. Lin) (z-lib.o...Linear circuit analysis - solution manuel (R. A. DeCarlo and P. Lin) (z-lib.o...
Linear circuit analysis - solution manuel (R. A. DeCarlo and P. Lin) (z-lib.o...
 
Ch.4-Examples 2.pdf
Ch.4-Examples 2.pdfCh.4-Examples 2.pdf
Ch.4-Examples 2.pdf
 
H c verma part 1 solution
H c verma part 1 solutionH c verma part 1 solution
H c verma part 1 solution
 
Solutions Manual for Foundations Of MEMS 2nd Edition by Chang Liu
Solutions Manual for Foundations Of MEMS 2nd Edition by Chang LiuSolutions Manual for Foundations Of MEMS 2nd Edition by Chang Liu
Solutions Manual for Foundations Of MEMS 2nd Edition by Chang Liu
 
Hyperon and charmed baryon masses and axial charges from Lattice QCD
Hyperon and charmed baryon masses and axial charges from Lattice QCDHyperon and charmed baryon masses and axial charges from Lattice QCD
Hyperon and charmed baryon masses and axial charges from Lattice QCD
 
Geotech Notes -1 ( Important problem solve)
Geotech Notes -1 ( Important problem solve)Geotech Notes -1 ( Important problem solve)
Geotech Notes -1 ( Important problem solve)
 
Examples on effective stress
Examples on effective stressExamples on effective stress
Examples on effective stress
 
Diseno y-calculo-de-puentes
Diseno y-calculo-de-puentesDiseno y-calculo-de-puentes
Diseno y-calculo-de-puentes
 
66.-Merle C. Potter, David C. Wiggert, Bassem H. Ramadan - Mechanics of Fluid...
66.-Merle C. Potter, David C. Wiggert, Bassem H. Ramadan - Mechanics of Fluid...66.-Merle C. Potter, David C. Wiggert, Bassem H. Ramadan - Mechanics of Fluid...
66.-Merle C. Potter, David C. Wiggert, Bassem H. Ramadan - Mechanics of Fluid...
 

Dernier

VIP Call Girls Ankleshwar 7001035870 Whatsapp Number, 24/07 Booking
VIP Call Girls Ankleshwar 7001035870 Whatsapp Number, 24/07 BookingVIP Call Girls Ankleshwar 7001035870 Whatsapp Number, 24/07 Booking
VIP Call Girls Ankleshwar 7001035870 Whatsapp Number, 24/07 Booking
dharasingh5698
 
Call Girls In Bangalore ☎ 7737669865 🥵 Book Your One night Stand
Call Girls In Bangalore ☎ 7737669865 🥵 Book Your One night StandCall Girls In Bangalore ☎ 7737669865 🥵 Book Your One night Stand
Call Girls In Bangalore ☎ 7737669865 🥵 Book Your One night Stand
amitlee9823
 
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
ssuser89054b
 

Dernier (20)

Double Revolving field theory-how the rotor develops torque
Double Revolving field theory-how the rotor develops torqueDouble Revolving field theory-how the rotor develops torque
Double Revolving field theory-how the rotor develops torque
 
Top Rated Pune Call Girls Budhwar Peth ⟟ 6297143586 ⟟ Call Me For Genuine Se...
Top Rated  Pune Call Girls Budhwar Peth ⟟ 6297143586 ⟟ Call Me For Genuine Se...Top Rated  Pune Call Girls Budhwar Peth ⟟ 6297143586 ⟟ Call Me For Genuine Se...
Top Rated Pune Call Girls Budhwar Peth ⟟ 6297143586 ⟟ Call Me For Genuine Se...
 
Navigating Complexity: The Role of Trusted Partners and VIAS3D in Dassault Sy...
Navigating Complexity: The Role of Trusted Partners and VIAS3D in Dassault Sy...Navigating Complexity: The Role of Trusted Partners and VIAS3D in Dassault Sy...
Navigating Complexity: The Role of Trusted Partners and VIAS3D in Dassault Sy...
 
Thermal Engineering -unit - III & IV.ppt
Thermal Engineering -unit - III & IV.pptThermal Engineering -unit - III & IV.ppt
Thermal Engineering -unit - III & IV.ppt
 
VIP Call Girls Ankleshwar 7001035870 Whatsapp Number, 24/07 Booking
VIP Call Girls Ankleshwar 7001035870 Whatsapp Number, 24/07 BookingVIP Call Girls Ankleshwar 7001035870 Whatsapp Number, 24/07 Booking
VIP Call Girls Ankleshwar 7001035870 Whatsapp Number, 24/07 Booking
 
Unit 1 - Soil Classification and Compaction.pdf
Unit 1 - Soil Classification and Compaction.pdfUnit 1 - Soil Classification and Compaction.pdf
Unit 1 - Soil Classification and Compaction.pdf
 
Thermal Engineering-R & A / C - unit - V
Thermal Engineering-R & A / C - unit - VThermal Engineering-R & A / C - unit - V
Thermal Engineering-R & A / C - unit - V
 
Call Girls In Bangalore ☎ 7737669865 🥵 Book Your One night Stand
Call Girls In Bangalore ☎ 7737669865 🥵 Book Your One night StandCall Girls In Bangalore ☎ 7737669865 🥵 Book Your One night Stand
Call Girls In Bangalore ☎ 7737669865 🥵 Book Your One night Stand
 
Double rodded leveling 1 pdf activity 01
Double rodded leveling 1 pdf activity 01Double rodded leveling 1 pdf activity 01
Double rodded leveling 1 pdf activity 01
 
(INDIRA) Call Girl Meerut Call Now 8617697112 Meerut Escorts 24x7
(INDIRA) Call Girl Meerut Call Now 8617697112 Meerut Escorts 24x7(INDIRA) Call Girl Meerut Call Now 8617697112 Meerut Escorts 24x7
(INDIRA) Call Girl Meerut Call Now 8617697112 Meerut Escorts 24x7
 
Generative AI or GenAI technology based PPT
Generative AI or GenAI technology based PPTGenerative AI or GenAI technology based PPT
Generative AI or GenAI technology based PPT
 
(INDIRA) Call Girl Bhosari Call Now 8617697112 Bhosari Escorts 24x7
(INDIRA) Call Girl Bhosari Call Now 8617697112 Bhosari Escorts 24x7(INDIRA) Call Girl Bhosari Call Now 8617697112 Bhosari Escorts 24x7
(INDIRA) Call Girl Bhosari Call Now 8617697112 Bhosari Escorts 24x7
 
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
 
KubeKraft presentation @CloudNativeHooghly
KubeKraft presentation @CloudNativeHooghlyKubeKraft presentation @CloudNativeHooghly
KubeKraft presentation @CloudNativeHooghly
 
University management System project report..pdf
University management System project report..pdfUniversity management System project report..pdf
University management System project report..pdf
 
NFPA 5000 2024 standard .
NFPA 5000 2024 standard                                  .NFPA 5000 2024 standard                                  .
NFPA 5000 2024 standard .
 
Design For Accessibility: Getting it right from the start
Design For Accessibility: Getting it right from the startDesign For Accessibility: Getting it right from the start
Design For Accessibility: Getting it right from the start
 
Call Girls Walvekar Nagar Call Me 7737669865 Budget Friendly No Advance Booking
Call Girls Walvekar Nagar Call Me 7737669865 Budget Friendly No Advance BookingCall Girls Walvekar Nagar Call Me 7737669865 Budget Friendly No Advance Booking
Call Girls Walvekar Nagar Call Me 7737669865 Budget Friendly No Advance Booking
 
UNIT - IV - Air Compressors and its Performance
UNIT - IV - Air Compressors and its PerformanceUNIT - IV - Air Compressors and its Performance
UNIT - IV - Air Compressors and its Performance
 
Work-Permit-Receiver-in-Saudi-Aramco.pptx
Work-Permit-Receiver-in-Saudi-Aramco.pptxWork-Permit-Receiver-in-Saudi-Aramco.pptx
Work-Permit-Receiver-in-Saudi-Aramco.pptx
 

Ch.3-Examples 3.pdf

  • 1. Chapter Three- Examples 1 Example (1): For the footing shown in the figure, find the ultimate bearing capacity, using Terzaghi's Eq. Assume general shear failure. Solution Terzaghi's Equation; from Table (3.1) ; qult = cNcsc + ̅Nq + 0.5γBNγsγ To choose shape factors; = >> 10; Hence, the footing can be considered as continuous (strip); sc = sγ = 1 Bearing capacity factors, using Table (3.2); for ϕ = 25ᵒ Nc = 25.1 , Nq = 12.7 , Nγ = 9.7 ̅ = 1 × 18.2 = 18.2 kN/m2 Hence; qult = 16 × 25.1 × 1 + 18.2 × 12.7 + 0.5 × 18.2 × 1 × 9.7 × 1 = 721.01 kN/m2 Example (2): A (1.2m) square footing is shown in the figure. Determine the gross and net allowable load that the footing can carry for a safety factor of (3), assuming; a- General shear failure of soil. b- Local shear failure of soil. (Note: use Terzaghi's Equation) γ = 18.2 kN/m3 c = 16 kPa ϕ = 25 ᵒ 1 m B =1 m , L = 20 m γ = 17.3 kN/m3 c = 9.6 kPa ϕ = 20 ᵒ 0.9 m 1.2 m P
  • 2. Chapter Three- Examples 2 Solution a- General shear failure; Terzaghi's Equation; from Table (3.1), qult = cNcsc + ́ Nq + 0.5γBNγsγ For square footing; shape factors are; sc = 1.3 , sγ = 0.8 Bearing capacity factors, using Table (3.2); for ϕ = 20ᵒ ; Nc = 17.7 , Nq = 7.4 , Nγ = 5.0 ̅ = 0.9 × 17.3 = 15.57 kPa Hence; qult = 9.6 × 17.7 × 1.3 + 15.57 × 7.4 + 0.5 × 17.3 × 1.2 × 5.0 × 0.8 = 377.63 kPa qa = = = 125.88 kPa Pa = qa . Af = 125.88 × (1.2)2 = 181.27 kN (qa)net = ̅ = = 120.69 kPa (Pa)net = (qa)net . Af = 120.69 × (1.2)2 = 173.79 kN b- Local shear failure; ́ = c = × 9.6 = 6.4 kPa tan ́ = tanϕ ; ́ = ( tanϕ) = ( × tan20) = 13.6ᵒ Bearing capacity factors, using Fig. (3.3) where ́ = 13.6ᵒ or using Fig. (3.4) where ϕ = 20ᵒ ; In the two cases, ́ = 11.8 , ́ = 3.9 , ́ = 1.7 qult = 6.4 × 11.8 × 1.3 + 15.57 × 3.9 + 0.5 × 17.3 × 1.2 × 1.7 × 0.8 = 173.02 kPa qa = = = 57.67 kPa Pa = qa . Af = 57.67 × (1.2)2 = 83.05 kN (qa)net = ̅ = = 52.48 kPa (Pa)net = (qa)net . Af = 52.48 × (1.2)2 = 57.57 kN
  • 3. Chapter Three- Examples 3 Example (3): A circular footing is shown in the figure, determine the allowable load that the footing can carry with safety factor of (3), using Meyerhof's bearing capacity equation. Solution Meyerhof's Equation for vertical load; from Table (3.1); qult = cNcscdc + ̅Nqsqdq + 0.5γBNγsγdγ since c = 0, hence; qult = ̅Nqsqdq + 0.5γBNγsγdγ Since the footing is circular, no adjustment is required for ϕ ̅ = 0.61 × 18.08 + 0.61 × (21.07 - 9.8) = 17.9 kPa Bearing capacity factors, using Table (3.4); for ϕ = 32ᵒ Nq = 23.2 Nγ = 22.0 Shape and depth factors; from Table (3.3); sq = sγ = 1 + 0.1Kp Kp = tan2 (45 + ) = tan2 (45 + ) = 3.255 sq = sγ = 1 + 0.1 × 3.255 × = 1.325 dq = dγ = 1 + 0.1 √ = 1 + 0.1 √ × = 1.18 qult = 17.9 × 23.2 × 1.325 × 1.18 + 0.5 × (21.07-9.8) × 1.22 ×22.0 × 1.325 ×1.18 = 855.52 kPa qa = = = 285.17 kPa Pa = qa . Af = 285.17 × (1.22)2 = 333.36 kN γst = 21.07 kN/m3 0.61 m 1.22 m 0.61 m γ = 18.08 kN/m3 c = 0 kPa ϕ = 32 ᵒ W.T. P
  • 4. Chapter Three- Examples 4 Example (4) (H.W.): Find the ultimate B.C. for the continuous footing shown for different locations of W.T. (Using Terzaghi equation) Solution qult = cNcsc + ̅Nq + 0.5γBNγsγ For strip (continuous) footing; (Table 3.1) Sc = Sγ = 1 position (a); for the 3rd term ; γ = ́ = 0 . = 10.19 kN/m3 ̅ = 2 × 10.19 = 20.38 kN/m2 qult = 0 + 20.38 × 36.5 + 0.5 × 10.19 × 1 × 36.0 × 1 = 927.29 kN/m2 position (b); for the 3rd erm ; γ = ́ = 0 . = 10.19 kN/m3 ̅ = 1 × 20 + 1 × 0 . = 30.19 kN/m2 qult = 0 + 30.19 × 36.5 + 0.5 × 10.19 × 1 × 36.0 × 1 = 1285.36 kN/m2 position (c); for the 3rd erm ; γ = ́ = 0 . = 10.19 kN/m3 ̅ = 2 × 20 = 40 kN/m2 qult = 0 + 40 × 36.5 + 0.5 × 10.19 × 1 × 36.0 × 1 = 1643.42 kN/m2 position (d); for the 3rd erm; γ = γ ̅ = γ γ γ = 10.19 + = 15.1 kN/m3 ̅ = 2 × 20 = 40 kN/m2 qult = 0 + 40 × 36.5 + 0.5 × 15.1 × 1 × 36.0 × 1 = 1731.8 kN/m2 γt = γsat = 20.0 kN/m3 1 m Sand ϕ = 34 ᵒ Nq = 36.5 Nγ = 36.0 1.0 m 0.5 m (b) W.T. (c) W.T. 1.0 m γw = 9.81 kN/m3 (d) W.T. (a) W.T.
  • 5. Chapter Three- Examples 5 Example (5) (H.W.): For the continuous footing shown, use Meyerhof bearing capacity equation to find the ultimate B.C. and the width of footing (B), taking (F = 2.5). Solution For  = 0 Nc = 5.14 , Nq = 1 , Nγ = 0 So; qult = c Nc sc dc + ̅ sq dq Shape factors; Sc = 1 ( = 0) Sq = 1 ( = 0) depth factors; dc = 1 + 0.2 √ = 1 + 0.2 × 1 × = 1 + dq = 1 ( = 0) qult = 100 × 5.14 × 1 × (1 + ) + (1 × 18) × 1 ×1 = 514 (1 + ) + 18 (qult)net = qult ̅ = 514 (1 + ) + 18 18 = 514 (1 + ) (qa)net = = = 205.6 (1 + ) Q = (qa)net × B 600 = 205.6 (1 + ) × B B = 2.72m qult = 514 (1 + ) + 18 = 569.8 kN/m2 γsat = 18.0 kN/m3 1.0 m B 0.5 m γsat = 20. 8 kN/m3 c = 100 kPa ϕ = 0 ᵒ W.T. Q = 600 kN/m
  • 6. Chapter Three- Examples 6 Example (6) (H.W.): A (0.75 m × 1.5 m ) rectangular footing is shown in the figure. Determine the magnitude of the ultimate load (Pult) applied eccentrically for bearing failure in the supporting soil. Use the general bearing capacity equation. Solution Hansen's Equation; from Table (3.1); qult = cNcscdcicgcbc + ̅Nqsqdqiqgqbq + 0.5γ ́ Nγsγdγiγgγbγ since c = 0, hence; qult = ̅Nqsqdqiqgqbq + 0.5γ ́ Nγsγdγiγgγbγ iq = gq = bq = iγ = gγ = bγ = 1 Bearing capacity factors, using Table (3.4); for ϕ = 30ᵒ ; Nq = 18.4 , Nγ = 15.1 ́ = L – 2ey= 1.5 – 2 × 0.12 = 1.26 m ́ = B – 2ex = 0.75 – 2 × 0.06 = 0.63 m Shape and depth factors; from Table (3.5); dq = 1 + 2 tan ϕ (1 – sin ϕ)2 = 1 + 2 tan30 (1 – sin 30)2 = 1.231 dγ = 1 sq = 1 + ́ ́ tan ϕ = 1 + tan 30 = 1.289 sγ = 1 – 0.4 ́ ́ = 1 – 0.4 × = 0.8 ̅ = 0.6 × 18.08 = 10.85 kPa qult = 10.85 × 18.4 × 1.289 × 1.231 + 0.5 × 18.08 × 0.63 × 15.1 × 0.8 × 1 = 385.58 kPa Pult = qult × Af = 385.58 × 0.63 × 1.26 = 306.07 kN 1.5 m 0.06 m 0.12 m γ = 18.08 kN/m3 c = 0 kPa ϕ = 30 ᵒ 0.75 m × 0.6 m
  • 7. Chapter Three- Examples 7 Example (7): for the rectangular footing shown find the allowable bearing capacity and the factor of safety using Hansen's equation. Use the following data; P = 3000 kN , Mx = 600 kN.m , My = 1500 kN.m , c = 0 , tri = 30o , γ = 16 kN/m3 , γsat = 18.8 kN/m3 Solution ex = = = 0 ey = = = 0.2 m e = = 3.6 m e = = 6 m γ γ γ = = 8.99 m ̅ = = 12.5 kN/m3 ̅ Df = 16 × 1.5 = 24 kN/m2 N-factors; for  = 30o [from Table 3.4] ; Nq = 18.4 , Nγ = 15.1 Shape factors; From table (3.5) tan = tan30 = 1.35 1.5 m 2.0 m W.T. P 2.0 m 2.0 m 2.5 m 3.5 m x y Mx My Mx , My
  • 8. Chapter Three- Examples 8 = = 0.76 depth factors; From table (3.5) tan (1 sin)2 = 1 + 2 tan30 (1 – sin30)2 × = 1.11 dγ = 1 since B ˃ ; hence = = 0.936 other factors; iq = iγ = gq = gγ = bq = bγ = 1 qult = cNcscdc + ̅Nqsqdq + 0.5γ ́ Nγsγdγrγ = 24 × 18.4 × 1.35 × 1.11 + 0.5 × 12.5 × 3.6 × 15.1 × 0.76 × 1 × 0.936 = 903.42 kN/m2 ̅ = 903.42 24 = 879.42 kN/m2 = = 6.33 By neglecting ( ̅ ) ; = = 6.5
  • 9. Chapter Three- Examples 9 Example (8) (H.W.): A foundation (1.5 m × 2.0m) is located at depth (Df = 1.0 m) in a clay layer (cu1 = 120 kPa , γ = 16.8 kN/m3 ). A softer clay layer (cu2 = 48 kPa , γ = 16.2 kN/m3 ) is located at a depth (d = 0.75 m) measured from the bottom of the foundation. Determine the allowable load (Pa) the foundation can carry with a factor of safety (F = 3). Solution ̅ = 120 kN/m2 ̅ = 16.8 × 1 = 16.8 kN/m2 0.4 , b = 0.75 , 1.0 From (Fig. 3.11), Nc = 3.6 ́ = = 0.15 ́ = = 0.267 = 628.9 kN/m2 209.6 kN/m2 Pa = qa × B × L = 209.6 × 1.5 × 2 = 628.9 kN d
  • 10. Chapter Three- Examples 11 Example (9): Check the adequacy of the footing shown in the figure. Use F = 3 and γw = 10 kN/m3 ). Solution To find γt for soil layer I, and γsat for al soil layers I, II, and III; γt)I = γ = = 17.25 kN/m3 γsat)I = γ = × 10 = 19.4 kN/m3 In the same manner, γsat)II = 18.7 kN/m3 , and γsat)III = 19.5 kN/m3 Assume that the effective depth equals (B = 1.5 m); Hence; HIII = 1.5 - 0.5 = 1 m A - Using Hansen equation with average shear parameters; From Table (3.1) ; qult = 5.14 su (1 + ́ + ́ - ́ - ́ - ́ ) + ̅ (qult)net = 5.14 su (1 + ́ + ́ - ́ - ́ - ́ ) ́ = ́ = ́ = 1 ; su = cav cav = ∑ ∑ = = 73.33 kPa III II I Soil Property 2..2 2..2 2.. GS 0.82 0.0 0.8 e 0..1 0..0 0.12 w 80 .0 10 c ( kPa) 0 0 .2 ϕᵒ 1.2 m × 2 m 0.8 m 0.4 m W.T . P = 300 kN working load 0.5 m Soil I Soil II Soil III
  • 11. Chapter Three- Examples 11 From Table (3.5); ́ = 0.2 = 0.2 × = 0.15 ́ = 0.4 = 0.4 × = 0.32 (qult)net = 5.14 × 73.33 (1 + 0.15 + 0.32) = 554.07 kPa (qa)net = = 184.69 kPa (Pa)net = (qa)net × Af = 4.6 × .5 × = 554.07 kN ˃ 300 kN o.k. B - Using Reddy and Srinivasan's Approach; qult = cu1. Nc (1 + ́ + ́ ) + ̅ (qult)net = cu1. Nc (1 + ́ + ́ ) = = 0.67 ; = = 1.33 Hence; from Figure (3.11), Nc = 6.5 Also, ́ = 0.15 , and ́ = 0.32 (qult)net = 60 × 6.5 (1 + 0.15 + 0.32) = 573.3 kPa (qa)net = = 191.1 kPa (Pa)net = 191.1 × 1.5 × 2 = 573.3 kN ˃ 300 kN o.k.
  • 12. Chapter Three- Examples 12 Example (10): For the soil-footing geometry shown, find the allowable bearing capacity if (F = 2) for sand and (F = 3) for clay. Use Hansen's equation Solution For the sand layer, qult = ̅Nqsqdq + 0.5γBNγsγdγ (all other factors = 1.0) For  = 34o , from Table (3.4) ; Nq = 29.4 Nγ = 28.7 Shape factors; From table (3.5) tan = tan34 = 1.67 = = 0.60 depth factors; From table (3.5) tan (1 sin)2 = 1 + 2 tan34 (1 – sin34)2 × = 1.20 dγ = 1 qult = (1.5 × 17.25) × 29.4 × 1.67 × 1.2 + 0.5 × 17.25 × 2.0 ×28.7 × 0.60 × 1.0 = 1821.54 kN/m2 For the clay layer, = cu1. Nc (1 + ́ + ́ ) + ̅ (all other factors = 0) ́ = = 0.2 ́ = = 0.3 D ˃ B [note: in rad] = 622.19 kN/m2 Punching contribution (per meter length) P = ̅ B × L = 2 m × 2 m 1.5 m W.T . P 0.6 m Sand C = 0 ,  = 34o γ = 17.25 kN/m3 clay su = qu/2 = 75 kPa su = undrained shear strength qu = unconfined shear strength
  • 13. Chapter Three- Examples 13 P = (1.5 × 17.25) × 0.6 + × 17.25 × (0.6)2 = 18.63 kN/m = 1 sin34 = 0 .44 p = 2 (L + B) = 2 (2 + 2) = 8m Af = 2 × 2 = 4 m2 = 633.25 kN/m2 < qult = 1821.54 kN/m2 The maximum footing pressure is controlled by the clay layer giving qult = 633.25 kN/m2 qa = = = 211.10 kN/m2 Example (11): The (S.P.T.) results from a soil boring located adjacent to a planned foundation for a proposed workhouse are shown below. If spread footings for the project are to be found (1.2 m) below surface ground, what foundation size should be provided to support (1800 kN) column load. Assume that (25.4 mm) settlement is tolerable. Water table is encountered at (7.5 m). Use Peck, Hansen, and Thornburn method. S.P.T. depth (m) Blow count. Nfield 0.3 9 1.2 10 2.4 15 3.6 22 4.8 19 6 29 7.5 33 10 27 γ = 17 kN/m3 1.2 m B 1800 kN W.T. 7.5 m γ́ = 10 kN/m3
  • 14. Chapter Three- Examples 14 Solution Find pressure ( ́ ᵒ ) at each depth and correct Nfield values; depth (m) Blow count. Nfield ́ ᵒ (kPa) ́ ᵒ (MPa) CN (from Fig. 2.12) ́ (Nfield × CN) 0.3 9 ---- ---- ---- ----- 1.2 10 1.2 × 17 = 20.4 0.0204 1.55 15 2.4 15 2.4 × 17 = 40.8 0.0408 1.28 19 3.6 22 3.6 × 17 = 61.2 0.0612 1.15 25 4.8 19 4.8 × 17 = 81.6 0.0816 1.05 20 6 29 6 × 17 = 102 0.1020 0.95 27 7.5 33 7.5 × 17 = 127.5 0.1275 0.90 30 10 27 7.5 × 17 + 2.5 × 10 = 152.5 0.1525 0.85 23 Assume that the effective depth equals to ( B ) Try B = 2.4 m ; and take values of ́ in the influence zone to find Nav ; Nav = 20 = = 0.5 From Figure (3.15) ; (qa)net = 0.211 MPa = 211 kPa (qa)net = ; L = = = 3.55 m So, we can use (2.5 m × 3.6 m)
  • 15. Chapter Three- Examples 15 Example (12): For the rectangular footing (B × 5m), the average value of SPT number within the footing influence zone is Nav. = 14. Find; (a) The corrected value of N considering the effect of overburden pressure only. (b) The footing width (B) and the allowable bearing capacity using Meyerhof approach. Solution ́ = 18.6 × 1.5 = 27.9 kN/m2 CN = 0.77 log ́ = 0.77 log = 1.43 Nc = CN . = 1.43 × 14 = 20 Pw = DL + LL = 3000 + 1500 = 4500 kN B ( m ) qa from Fig. (3.16) (kPa) = (kPa) 2 330 450 3 300 300 So, take B = 3m Sand γ = 18.6 kN/m3 1.5 m B DL = 3000 kN LL = 1500 kN G.L. .Nav = 14
  • 16. Chapter Three- Examples 16 Example (13) (H.W.): For the square footing shown, if the average value of the cone resistance within the rupture zone is qc = 8.25 MPa, find the footing dimensions and the allowable B.C. using Meyerhof approach for the following two cases; ( a ) when the W.T. (5m) depth below G.L. ( b ) when the W.T. at G.L. Solution Pw = DL + LL = 1000 + 500 = 1500 kN { r ( ) r } case B ( m ) qa = ( ) (kPa) = (kPa) a 2.0 218.21 375 2.5 206.98 240 3.0 199.65 166.67 2.75 202.96 198.35 b 4 0.5 (190.7) = 95.34 93.75 So, for case ( a ); B = 2.75 m and for case ( b ); B = 4.0 m Medium sand ( qc )av. = 8.25 MPa 5.0 m B DL = 1000 kN LL = 500 kN G.L. W.T. (a) W.T. (b)
  • 17. Chapter Three- Examples 17 Example (14): A (1.2m × 1.2m × 0.6m) footing is placed at (1.8m) depth in a soil having γ = 7.3 kN/m3 , ϕ = 20ᵒ, and c = 19.2 kPa). Estimate the allowable uplift force for (F = 2.5). Solution To find the type of foundation; shallow or deep; = = 1.5 From Table (3.7), to find limiting embedment ration for ϕ = 20ᵒ; = 2.5 > 1.5 So, the footing behaves as shallow footing. To find the ultimate uplift force for shallow rectangular footing, the equation to be used is; Tu = c.D B + L + γ.D2 (2sf .B + L – B) Ku.tanϕ + W From Table (3.7), for ϕ = 20ᵒ; m = 0.05, and maximum Sf = 1.12 Sf = 1 + m. = 1 + 0.05 × 1.5 = 1.075 < 1.12 Ku = Kᵒ = (1 – sinϕ) √ For normally consolidated clay; OCR = 1; Hence; Ku = Kᵒ = (1 – sin20) √ = 0.66 W = 1.2 × 1.2 × 0.6 × 24 + (1.8 – 0.6) × 1.2 × 1.2 × 17.3 = 50.63 kN Tu = 2 × 19.2 × 1.8 (1.2 + 1.2) + 17.3 × (1.8)2 (2 × 1.075 × 1.2 + 1.2 – 1.2) 0.66 tan20 + 50.63 = 251.3 kN Tall = = = 100.5 kN