Risk Mapping for PTBC Operations

1. 2010; MEP TOUR OF DUTY
& RISKS OBSERVATION
PT. Berau Coal

2. Background
B k d
UU N 1/1970
No.1/1970
KEPMEN 555/1995
BeGeMS
Corporate Philosophy

3. Risk Mapping
pp g
Measure the Hazard
M h H d
Exposure at every activity.
Hazard Finding.
Immediately Action Taken.
Implementation
p
measurement the current
system.
Baseline Data.
B li D
Next Strategic Plan.

4. Risk Mapping
pp g
Establish the context
Com municate an consult
Identify risks
Monitor and review
nd
Analyse risks
M
Evaluate risks
Assess risks
Treat risks

5. Consequences
q
CAUSE EFFECT

6. Consequences
q
CAUSE EFFECT

7. Significant Trends
g
Major/Fatal
M j /F l
1
Year of 2008, Dec ‘09 – Jan ‘10,
Minor
10
1 0
Property Damaged
P t D d
30
2 [3] 2
285 21 600
Near Miss
2145 728
≈ 2000 ≈ ??? At Risk
20.000
Behavior &
At Risk
Conditions
Frank E. Bird ratio; 1982

8. Preventive Actions
At Risk Behavior Incident
Basic Causes & At Risk Injury Losses
Conditions Occurred

9. Gap Analysis
p y
Finding’s
Fi di ’ PTBC St d d
Standard
Inspection’s Yes; no CAR’s
Compliances How far ?
Understanding’s Only 50%
Risk Assessment ASDAM; too general
Awareness Mostly lack
MSDS Yes; b t
Y but no evidence
id
Implementations Very low

10. OBJECTIVES
“The effort to prevent any loss
and fatalities ”
fatalities.

11. Objectives
j
Commitments
Implementations
Engineering Control
Document Control
Measurement
Involvement

12. How to do it ?
Raising of Sense
Daily Commitment
Management Touch
Document Review
g
Sustainable Monitoring
Duty of Care

13. HAZARD CONTROL STANDARD
…was th b t practice
the best ti
approached to achieved our
pp
objective and target:
a “Prevention of Fatalities”

15. Thank you and Have a Safe W
f Work
Walk the Talk;
Trust the Worthy;
and Living Example.