Recommandé
Recommandé
Contenu connexe
Tendances
Tendances (20)
En vedette
Similaire à Variable costing a tool for management
Similaire à Variable costing a tool for management (20)
Dernier
Dernier (20)
Variable costing a tool for management
- 1. Variable Costing: A Tool for Management Chapter 7 Muhammad Sario, Sukkur IBA
- 2. Overview of Absorption and Variable Costing Absorption Costing Variable Costing Direct Materials Product Costs Direct Labor Product Costs Variable Manufacturing Overhead Fixed Manufacturing Overhead Period Costs Variable Selling and Administrative Expenses Period Costs Fixed Selling and Administrative Expenses Muhammad Sario, Sukkur IBA 7-2
- 3. Unit Cost Computations Harvey Company produces a single product with the following information available: Number of units produced annually Variable costs per unit: Direct materials, direct labor, and variable mfg. overhead Selling & administrative expenses $ $ Fixed costs per year: Manufacturing overhead Selling & administrative expenses $ 150,000 $ 100,000 Muhammad Sario, Sukkur IBA 25,000 10 3 7-3
- 4. Unit Cost Computations Unit product cost is determined as follows: Absorption Costing Direct materials, direct labor, and variable mfg. overhead Fixed mfg. overhead ($150,000 ÷ 25,000 units) Unit product cost Variable Costing $ 10 $ 10 $ 6 16 $ 10 Under absorption costing, all production costs, variable and fixed, are included when determining unit product cost. Under variable costing, only the variable production costs are included in product costs. Muhammad Sario, Sukkur IBA 7-4
- 5. Income Comparison of Absorption and Variable Costing Let’s assume the following additional information for Harvey Company. 20,000 units were sold during the year at a price of $30 each. There is no beginning inventory. Now, let’s compute net operating income using both absorption and variable costing. Muhammad Sario, Sukkur IBA 7-5
- 6. Absorption Costing Absorption Costing Sales (20,000 × $30) Less cost of goods sold: Beginning inventory $ Add COGM (25,000 × $16) 400,000 Goods available for sale 400,000 Ending inventory (5,000 × $16) 80,000 Gross margin Less selling & admin. exp. Variable (20,000 × $3) $ 60,000 Fixed 100,000 Net operating income $ 600,000 320,000 280,000 160,000 $ 120,000 Fixed manufacturing overhead deferred in inventory is 5,000 units × $6 = $30,000. Muhammad Sario, Sukkur IBA 7-6
- 7. Variable Costing Variable manufacturing Variable Costing costs only. Sales (20,000 × $30) Less variable expenses: Beginning inventory $ Add COGM (25,000 × $10) 250,000 Goods available for sale 250,000 Less ending inventory (5,000 × $10) 50,000 Variable cost of goods sold 200,000 Variable selling & administrative expenses (20,000 × $3) 60,000 Contribution margin Less fixed expenses: Manufacturing overhead $ 150,000 Selling & administrative expenses 100,000 Net operating income Muhammad Sario, Sukkur IBA $ 600,000 All fixed manufacturing overhead is expensed. 260,000 340,000 250,000 $ 90,000 7-7
- 8. Comparing the Two Methods Cost of Goods Sold Ending Inventory Period Expense Absorption costing Variable mfg. costs $ 200,000 Fixed mfg. costs 120,000 $ 320,000 $ 50,000 30,000 $ 80,000 $ Variable costing Variable mfg. costs $ 200,000 Fixed mfg. costs $ 200,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ Muhammad Sario, Sukkur IBA $ - 150,000 $ 150,000 Total $ 250,000 150,000 $ 400,000 $ 250,000 150,000 $ 400,000 7-8
- 9. Comparing the Two Methods We can reconcile the difference between absorption and variable income as follows: Variable costing net operating income $ 90,000 Add: Fixed mfg. overhead costs deferred in inventory (5,000 units × $6 per unit) 30,000 Absorption costing net operating income $ 120,000 Fixed mfg. overhead $150,000 = = $6 per unit Units produced 25,000 units Muhammad Sario, Sukkur IBA 7-9
- 10. Extended Comparisons of Income Data Harvey Company – Year Two Number of units produced Number of units sold Units in beginning inventory Unit sales price Variable costs per unit: Direct materials, direct labor variable mfg. overhead Selling & administrative expenses Fixed costs per year: Manufacturing overhead Selling & administrative expenses Muhammad Sario, Sukkur IBA 25,000 30,000 5,000 $ 30 $ 10 $ 3 $ 150,000 $ 100,000 7-10
- 11. Unit Cost Computations Absorption Costing Direct materials, direct labor, and variable mfg. overhead Fixed mfg. overhead ($150,000 ÷ 25,000 units) Unit product cost Variable Costing $ 10 $ 10 $ 6 16 $ 10 Since the variable costs per unit, total fixed costs, and the number of units produced remained unchanged, the unit cost computations also remain unchanged. Muhammad Sario, Sukkur IBA 7-11
- 12. Absorption Costing Unit product Sales (30,000 × $30) Less cost of goods sold: Beg. inventory (5,000 × $16) Add COGM (25,000 × $16) Goods available for sale Less ending inventory Gross margin Less selling & admin. exp. Variable (30,000 × $3) Fixed Net operating income Absorption Costing cost. $ 900,000 $ 80,000 400,000 480,000 - $ 90,000 100,000 480,000 420,000 190,000 $ 230,000 Fixed manufacturing overhead released from inventory is 5,000 units × $6 = $30,000. Muhammad Sario, Sukkur IBA 7-12
- 13. Variable Costing Variable manufacturing costs only. Variable Costing Sales (30,000 × $30) $ 900,000 Less variable expenses: Beg. inventory (5,000 × $10) $ 50,000 Add COGM (25,000 × $10) 250,000 All fixed Goods available for sale 300,000 manufacturing Less ending inventory overhead is Variable cost of goods sold 300,000 expensed. Variable selling & administrative expenses (30,000 × $3) 90,000 390,000 Contribution margin 510,000 Less fixed expenses: Manufacturing overhead $ 150,000 Selling & administrative expenses 100,000 250,000 Net operating income $ 260,000 Muhammad Sario, Sukkur IBA 7-13
- 14. Comparing the Two Methods We can reconcile the difference between absorption and variable income as follows: Variable costing net operating income $ 260,000 Deduct: Fixed manufacturing overhead costs released from inventory (5,000 units × $6 per unit) 30,000 Absorption costing net operating income $ 230,000 Fixed mfg. overhead $150,000 = = $6 per unit Units produced 25,000 units Muhammad Sario, Sukkur IBA 7-14
- 15. Comparing the Two Methods Costing Method Absorption Variable 1st Period $ 120,000 90,000 Muhammad Sario, Sukkur IBA 2nd Period $ 230,000 260,000 Total $ 350,000 350,000 7-15
- 16. Summary of Key Insights Relation between production and sales Units produced = Units sold Units produced > Units sold Units produced < Units sold Muhammad Sario, Sukkur IBA Effect on iniventories No change In inventories Inventories Increase Inventories decrease Relation between variable and absorption income Absorption = Variable Absorption > Variable Absorption < Variable 7-16
- 17. CVP Analysis, Decision Making and Absorption costing Absorption costing does not dovetail with CVP analysis, nor does it support decision making. It treats fixed manufacturing overhead as a variable cost. It assigns per unit fixed manufacturing overhead costs to production. Treating fixed manufacturing overhead as a Treating overhead as variable cost can: • Lead to faulty pricing decisions and faulty • Lead to faulty and faulty keep-or-drop decisions. decisions. Assigning per unit fixed manufacturing overhead per unit overhead costs to production can: to can: • Potentially produce positive net operating income even when the number of units sold is less than the breakeven point. Muhammad Sario, Sukkur IBA 7-17
- 18. External Reporting and Income Taxes To conform to To conform to GAAP requirements, GAAP requirements, absorption costing must be used for absorption costing must be used for external financial reports in the external financial reports in the Under the Tax Under the Tax United States. United States. Reform Act of 1986, Reform Act of 1986, absorption costing must be absorption costing must be used when filling out used when filling out Since top executives Since top executives income tax returns. income tax returns. are typically evaluated based on are typically evaluated based on earnings reported to shareholders earnings reported to shareholders in external reports, they may feel that in external reports, they may feel that decisions should be based on decisions should be based on absorption costing data. absorption costing data. Muhammad Sario, Sukkur IBA 7-18
- 19. Advantages of Variable Costing and the Contribution Approach Management finds it more useful. Advantages Impact of fixed costs on profits emphasized. Muhammad Sario, Sukkur IBA Consistent with CVP analysis. Net operating income is closer to net cash flow. Consistent with standard costs and flexible budgeting. Easier to estimate profitability of products and segments. Profit is not affected by changes in inventories. 7-19
- 20. Impact of Lean Production When companies use Lean Production . . . Production tends to equal sales . . . So, the difference between variable and absorption income tends to disappear. Muhammad Sario, Sukkur IBA 7-20
- 21. End of Chapter 7 Muhammad Sario, Sukkur IBA 7-21
Notes de l'éditeur
- Chapter 7: Variable Costing: A Tool for Management. Two general approaches are used for valuing inventories and cost of goods sold. One approach, called absorption costing, is generally used for external reporting purposes. The other approach, called variable costing, is preferred by some managers for internal decision making and must be used when an income statement is prepared in the contribution format. This chapter shows how these two methods differ from each other.
- Absorption costing (also called the full cost method) treats all costs of production as product costs, regardless of whether they are variable or fixed. Since no distinction is made between variable and fixed costs, absorption costing is not well suited for CVP computations. Under absorption costing, the cost of a unit of product consists of direct materials, direct labor, and both variable and fixed overhead. Variable and fixed selling and administrative expenses are treated as period costs and are deducted from revenue as incurred. Variable costing (also called direct costing or marginal costing) treats only those costs of production that vary with output as product costs. This approach dovetails with the contribution approach income statement and supports CVP analysis because of its emphasis on separating variable and fixed costs. The cost of a unit of product consists of direct materials, direct labor, and variable overhead. Fixed manufacturing overhead, and both variable and fixed selling and administrative expenses are treated as period costs and deducted from revenue as incurred. Think about the impact of each method on inventory values, and then answer the following question.
- Harvey Company produces 25,000 units of a single product. Variable manufacturing costs total $10 per unit. Variable selling and administrative expenses are $3 per unit. Fixed manufacturing overhead for the year is $150,000 and fixed selling and administrative expenses for the year are $100,000.
- The unit product costs under absorption and variable costing would be $16 and $10, respectively. Under absorption costing, all production costs, variable and fixed, are included when determining unit product cost. Under variable costing, only the variable production costs are included in product costs.
- We need some additional information to allow us to prepare income statements for Harvey Company: 20,000 units were sold during the year. The selling price per unit is $30. There is no beginning inventory. Now let’s prepare income statements for Harvey Company. We will start with an absorption income statement.
- Part I. Harvey sold only 20,000 of the 25,000 units produced, leaving 5,000 units in ending inventory. At a sales price of $30 per unit, sales revenue for the 20,000 units sold is $600,000. At a unit product cost of $16, cost of goods sold for the 20,000 units sold is $320,000. Subtracting cost of goods sold from sales, we find the gross margin of $280,000. After subtracting selling and administrative expenses from the gross margin, we see that net operating income is $120,000. Part II. Fixed manufacturing overhead deferred in inventory, as a result of the 5,000 unsold units at $6 of fixed overhead per unit, is $30,000.
- Now let’s examine a variable cost income statement. Notice that this is a contribution format statement. First, we subtract all variable expenses from sales to get contribution margin. At a product cost of $10 per unit, the variable cost of goods sold for 20,000 units is $200,000. The next variable expense is the variable selling and administrative expense. After computing contribution margin, we subtract fixed expenses to get the $90,000 net operating income. Note that all $150,000 of fixed manufacturing overhead is expensed in the current period.
- Under absorption costing, $120,000 of fixed manufacturing overhead is included in cost of goods sold and $30,000 is deferred in ending inventory as an asset on the balance sheet. Under variable costing, the entire $150,000 of fixed manufacturing overhead is treated as a period expense. The variable costing ending inventory is $30,000 less than absorption costing, thus explaining the difference in net operating income between the two methods.
- The difference in net operating income between the two methods ($30,000) can also be reconciled by multiplying the number of units in ending inventory (5,000 units) by the fixed manufacturing overhead per unit ($6) that is deferred in ending inventory under absorption costing.
- In the second year, Harvey Company sells 30,000 units. The selling price per unit, variable costs per unit, total fixed costs, and number of units produced remain unchanged. Five thousand units are in beginning inventory, left from last year.
- Since the variable costs per unit, total fixed costs, and the number of units produced remained unchanged, the unit cost computations also remain unchanged.
- Part I. Of the 30,000 units sold in the second year, 25,000 units were produced in the second year and 5,000 units came from beginning inventory. The $30,000 of fixed manufacturing overhead deferred into inventory in the first year is released from inventory this year as part of the $16 unit product cost. Selling and administrative expenses are deducted from gross margin to obtain the net operating income of $230,000. Part II. Fixed manufacturing overhead is released from inventory as a result of the 5,000 units sold in the second year that were produced in the first year. The amount released is $30,000 (5,000 units at $6 of fixed overhead per unit).
- Now, let’s examine a variable cost income statement for the second year. Again, notice that this is a contribution format statement. At a product cost of $10 per unit, the variable cost of goods sold for 30,000 units is $300,000. After computing contribution margin, we subtract fixed expenses to get the $260,000 net operating income. Note that all $150,000 of fixed manufacturing overhead is expensed in the current period.
- The difference in net operating income between the two methods ($30,000) can be reconciled by multiplying the number of units in beginning inventory (5,000 units) by the fixed manufacturing overhead per unit ($6) that is released from beginning inventory under absorption costing.
- Across the two-year time frame, both methods reported the same total net operating income ($350,000). This is because over an extended period of time sales cannot exceed production, nor can production much exceed sales. The shorter the time period, the more the net operating income figures will tend to differ.
- On your screen is a summary of what we have observed from the Harvey Company’s two years: When units produced equal units sold, the two methods report the same net operating income. When units produced are greater units sold, as in year 1 for Harvey, absorption income is greater than variable costing income. When units produced are less than units sold, as in year 2 for Harvey, absorption costing income is less than variable costing income.
- Absorption costing does not dovetail with CVP analysis, nor does it support decision making. It treats fixed manufacturing overhead as a variable cost. This can lead to faulty pricing decisions and faulty keep-or-drop decisions. It also assigns per unit fixed manufacturing overhead costs to production. This can potentially produce positive net operating income even when the number of units sold is less than the breakeven point.
- Practically speaking, absorption costing is required for external reports in the United States. Under the Tax Reform Act of 1986, a form of absorption costing must be used when filling out income tax forms. Since top executives are typically evaluated based on earnings reported to shareholders in external reports, they may feel that decisions should be based on absorption costing data.
- The advantages of variable costing and the contribution approach include: The data required for CVP analysis can be taken directly from a contribution format income statement. Profits move in the same direction as sales, assuming other things remain the same. Managers often assume that unit product costs are variable costs. Under variable costing, this assumption is true. Fixed costs appear explicitly on a contribution format income statement; thus, the impact of fixed costs on profits is emphasized. Variable costing data make it easier to estimate the profitability of products, customers, and other business segments. Variable costing ties in with cost control methods, such as standard costs and flexible budgeting. Variable costing net operating income is closer to net cash flow than absorption costing net operating income.
- When companies use Lean Production, the goal is to eliminate finished goods inventories and reduce work in process inventory to almost nothing. This causes absorption costing net operating income to essentially move in the same direction as sales. Therefore, the difference between absorption costing and variable costing income tends to disappear.
- End of chapter 7.