SlideShare une entreprise Scribd logo
1  sur  20
Télécharger pour lire hors ligne
2013/2014 Global Salary Study
compensation guide
f o r a n t i - f r a u d p r o f e ss i o n a l s
2 Compensation Guide for Anti-Fraud Professionals
Compensation
Guide for Anti-Fraud
Professionals
Table of Contents
INTRODUCTION
About This Report...............................................................4
Highlighted Trends..............................................................5
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Respondent Personal and Professional Profile
Age-Range of Participants...................................................6
Gender.................................................................................6
Education Information.........................................................7
CFEs vs. Non-CFEs..............................................................7
Years of Fraud-Related Experience......................................8
Level of Professional Responsibility....................................8
Respondent Compensation Profile
Median Total Compensation...............................................9
CFE vs. Non-CFE Compensation.........................................9
Compensation by Age and Gender...................................10
Compensation by Education Level....................................10
Compensation by Job Function........................................11
Fraud Examiner and Internal Auditor.................................11
Compensation by Primary Industry of Focus......................12
Compensation by Level of Responsibility.........................13
Compensation by Years of Fraud-Related Experience	�������13
Respondent Geographic Profile
Geographic Representation...............................................14
Regional Compensation Comparison................................15
Respondent Benefits Profile
Benefits Information..........................................................16
Retirement Plans...............................................................17
APPENDIX
Survey Methodology.........................................................18
About the ACFE.................................................................19
2013/2014 Global Salary Study 3
Letter from the President and CEO
As an anti-fraud professional, how does your level of compensation compare with that of your peers? Are you armed
with the information you need to ensure your career is moving in the right direction?
The statistics presented in this 2013/2014 Compensation Guide for Anti-Fraud Professionals represent an ongoing effort
to gather the data needed to help you answer these and other important questions. Collected and analyzed by an
independent research group, the results provide benchmarks specific to the anti-fraud profession regarding salary,
benefits and other compensation — weighed against factors such as
industry, job role, professional credentials, experience, geographic location
and other qualifiers.
It has been two years since the last Compensation Guide, and since that
time, the anti-fraud profession has continued to evolve. Fraud is clearly a
global problem, and fraud fighters are in demand by organizations world-
wide. In this latest study, international participation increased from 20
percent to nearly 27 percent. This is likely a reflection of the increasing
number of fraud fighters filling the global ranks of the anti-fraud profession.
Once again, the data shows that being recognized as an expert in the field
increasingly correlates to a significantly higher level of compensation.
The study finds that individuals with the Certified Fraud Examiner (CFE)
credential earn 25 percent more than their non-certified peers. This marks
an increase from the 22 percent premium reported just two years ago. An
equally eye-opening statistic: Of the individuals who identified their level
of responsibility as Executive (C-Level), nearly 80 percent have the CFE
credential.
I am pleased to introduce something new with this year’s Compensation
Guide: an online salary calculator that allows you to compare your com-
pensation to peers in industry, job function and level of responsibility. This
feature has been added as part of our effort to make it easy for you to
know where you stand in relation to your colleagues in the profession and
give you information you can use when negotiating with supervisors or
potential employers.
I hope you find the information in this Compensation Guide as interesting
and enlightening as I do. Most importantly, thank you to all who submitted
data for this study — this guide would not have been possible without you.
Sincerely,
James D. Ratley, CFE
President and CEO
As an anti-fraud professional, how
does your level of compensation
compare with that of your peers?
4 Compensation Guide for Anti-Fraud Professionals
The Association of Certified Fraud Examiners has com-
pleted the 2013/2014 Compensation Guide for Anti-Fraud
Professionals. The information contained in this report
represents complete, accurate and up-to-date compen-
sation data for the anti-fraud profession. The report is
broken down by personal, professional, compensation,
geographic and benefits profiles, and is designed to allow
individuals to easily compare their compensation levels
and benefits with their peers.
This guide is based on research conducted by profession-
al research firm Industry Insights, Inc. for the ACFE. The
compensation data has been aggregated in the following
categories by CFEs vs. non-CFEs so individuals can com-
pare their own data to the results of their peers. These
aggregations include:
❙❙ All Respondents (CFEs vs. non-CFEs)
❙❙ Job Function
❙❙ Primary Industry of Focus
❙❙ Highest Level of Education Completed
❙❙ Age and Gender
❙❙ Years of Fraud-Related Experience
❙❙ Level of Responsibility
❙❙ Geographic Region
As an individual compares his or her compensation
information to that of others in the anti-fraud profession,
it is important to remember that the statistics published
in this report should be regarded as guidelines rather
than absolute standards. Because organizations will differ
depending upon their location, size and other factors, any
two organizations may offer very different compensation
packages. For example, duration of employment and
nature of prior experience will obviously influence the
compensation offering for a particular individual. Thus, a
deviation between anyone’s compensation and a number
appearing on a table in this report is not necessarily good
or bad; it is merely an indication that additional scrutiny
may be warranted.
In addition to compensation data, the survey collected
information on benefits including insurance, professional
development/personal benefits and retirement plans.
We are proud to present the enclosed insights into the
compensation and benefits policies for the anti-fraud
professional.
Introduction
About This Report
Make sure to visit
ACFE.com/SalaryCenter
to access our salary
calculator and other
important information
about your individual
compensation.
2013/2014 Global Salary Study 5
❙❙ CFEs continue to earn a significant premium over
those without the credential. The results of this
year’s survey found that CFEs earn 25% more than
their non-certified counterparts.
❙❙ Overall, compensation levels across most
industries remained relatively unchanged since the
2010/2011 Compensation Guide. The overall median
compensation reported is representative of this
economic trend.
❙❙ Governance, Risk and Compliance, Loss
Prevention and Law Enforcement Officer were
among the top ranking job functions that showed
the highest median salary advantage for having the
CFE credential, with CFEs earning 30-50% more
than non-CFEs.
❙❙ In the U.S., almost every geographical region
reported that having the CFE credential increased
their earning potential. CFEs in the East North
Central U.S. region reported the highest salary
premiums, earning 35% more than non-CFEs.
❙❙ More than 26% of respondents are international.
International CFEs outside Canada and Europe
earned 34% more than non-CFEs.
❙❙ Of the respondents that indicated they are in an
executive-level position in their organizations,
nearly 78% are CFEs.
❙❙ The majority of respondents had more than five
years or more of fraud-related experience. Nearly
20% of the responding CFEs had more than 20 years
of fraud-related experience.
Highlighted Trends
The ACFE’s 2013/2014 Compensation Guide for Anti-Fraud
Professionals reveals that:
CFEs earn 25%
more than their
non-certified
counterparts.
6 Compensation Guide for Anti-Fraud Professionals
Executive Summary
Respondent Personal and Professional Profile
Age Range of Participants
The largest group of survey participants range between 35 and 50 years old, accounting for about 44% of both CFEs and
non-CFEs. There is a greater percentage of non-CFE participants (34.4%) between the ages of 18 and 35 than CFE partic-
ipants (26.9%) in the same age range; conversely, there is a greater percentage of CFE participants (30.1%) over the age
of 50 than non-CFE participants (21.2%) in the same age range.
Age Range of Participants
Gender
About two-thirds of the respondents were male, with a
median age of 42 and a median of 11 years of fraud-
related experience. Female respondents had a median
age of 42 and had a median 8 years of fraud-related
experience.
CFEs by Gender Female Male
Median Age 42 42
Median Years of Fraud-Related Experience 8 11
gender
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Over 50
35–50
18–35
Non-CFE
CFE
26.9% 43.0% 30.1%
34.4% 44.4% 21.2%
Male
65.3%
Female
34.7%
The largest group
of survey partici-
pants is between
the ages of 35 and
50 accounting
for about 44% of
both CFEs and
non-CFEs.
2013/2014 Global Salary Study 7
CFE vs. Non-CFE
Of the 5,486 survey participants, more than two out of
three were CFEs.
Education Information
The majority of participants have at least a four-year
college degree (92.6% of CFEs and 84.5% of non-CFEs).
About 48% also have a graduate or post-graduate degree
(48.3% of CFEs and 45.9% of non-CFEs). The responses
indicate that very few anti-fraud professionals enter the
field with less than a four-year degree or some form of
post high-school, technical or trade school.
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50%
Non-CFECFE
Graduate or post-
graduate degree
Four-year
college degree
Two-year
college degree
Post-high school,
technical or
trade school
Some college
High school
0.8%
1.4%
3.6%
8.0%
1.0%
2.0%
44.3%
48.3%
2.1%
4.0%
38.6%
45.9%
PERCENT OF RESPONDENTS
EDUCATIONLEVELOFRESPONDENTS
education information
cfe vs. non-cfe
CFE
72.7%
Non-CFE
27.3%
The majority of
participants have
at least a four-year
college degree.
8 Compensation Guide for Anti-Fraud Professionals
Fraud-Related Experience
The largest disparity between CFEs and non-CFEs emerges
at more than 20 years of experience: 19.1% of participating
CFEs have more than 20 years of experience, compared to
only 11.0% of non-CFE participants.
Level of Professional Responsibility
More than 60% of the respondents indicated their level
of professional responsibility was “Manager” or above. Of
the 6.8% of the respondents who indicated they are at an
executive level of responsibility, 77.7% are CFEs.
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30%
Other
Administrative
Support
Staff / Consultant
/ Analyst
Manager
Supervisor /
Senior Consultant
Director
Partner/Principal
Vice President
Executive (C-Level) 6.8%
3.8%
3.4%
11.3%
15.2%
23.0%
29.3%
0.7%
6.5%
PERCENT OF RESPONDENTS
PROFESSIONALLEVELOFRESPONSIBILITYOFRESPONDENTS
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80%
Non-CFECFE
Other
Staff / Consultant
/ Analyst
Manager
Supervisor /
Senior Consultant
Director
Partner/Principal
Vice President
Executive (C-Level) 77.7%
22.3%
72.2%
27.8%
76.4%
23.6%
79.7%
72.6%
20.3%
27.4%
26.3%
30.4%
32.8%
73.8%
67.2%
69.6%
PERCENT OF RESPONDENTS
PROFESSIONALLEVELOFRESPONSIBILITYOFCFES
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30%
Non-CFECFE
20+ years
10–19 years
5–9 years
3–4 years
0–2 years
13.9%
26.1%
11.6%
14.0%
27.7%
27.8%
19.1%
26.6%
22.4%
11.0%
PERCENT OF RESPONDENTS
FRAUD-RELATEDEXPERIENCEOFRESPONDENTS
level of professional responsibility
level of professional responsibility of executives
fraud-related experience
2013/2014 Global Salary Study 9
CFE vs. Non-CFE Compensation
The table below shows compensation ranges at the 25th percentile, median and 75th percentile.1
All Respondents
CFE Non-CFE
CFE
Premium
25th
percentile
Median
75th
percentile
25th
percentile
Median
75th
percentile
Based on
Median
Total Annual Compensation $68,000 $91,000 $125,000 $51,800 $73,000 $105,000 25%
Respondent Compensation Profile
Median Total Compensation
The survey data indicates that there is a significant earning advantage for CFEs over non-CFEs. Based on participant
responses, the median total compensation for a CFE is $91,000, compared to $73,000 for a non-CFE. This represents a
CFE premium of 25%.
1
See definitions of 25th percentile, median and 75th percentile on page 18.
median total compensation
$0 $20,000 $40,000 $60,000 $80,000 $100,000
Non-CFE
CFE $91,000
$73,000
MEDIAN TOTAL COMPENSATION
RESPONDENT
Make sure to visit ACFE.com/SalaryCenter to
access our salary calculator and other important
information about your individual compensation.
10 Compensation Guide for Anti-Fraud Professionals
Compensation Ranges by Age and Gender
As one might expect, an age range increase corresponds with a compensation range increase, based upon the survey. At
the higher end (age over 50), CFEs earn a median total compensation of $105,668, compared to $96,200 for non-CFEs.
This represents a CFE premium of almost 10%.
The difference in compensation levels based on gender is evident among both CFEs and non-CFEs. Among CFEs, the
median for males is more than 16% higher than females. For non-CFEs, the gap is less, as the median total compensa-
tion for males is nearly 15% higher than females. The median total compensation for female CFEs was more than 24%
higher than their non-CFE counterparts. For male CFEs, the gap is slightly larger, as the median total compensation for
male CFEs is 26% higher than their non-CFE counterparts.
By Age
CFE Non-CFE
CFE
Premium
25th
percentile
Median
75th
percentile
25th
percentile
Median
75th
percentile
Based on
Median
18–35 $59,500 $75,000 $92,768 $44,036 $58,000 $75,563 29%
35–50 $69,500 $95,000 $130,000 $55,000 $78,750 $110,000 21%
Over 50 $81,850 $105,668 $145,000 $69,247 $96,200 $134,850 10%
By Gender
Female $65,000 $83,500 $108,000 $51,434 $67,300 $90,750 24%
Male $70,000 $97,000 $135,000 $52,900 $77,175 $114,250 26%
Compensation Ranges by Education Level
As detailed on page 7, most survey respondents have at least a four-year university degree. Among these respondents,
CFEs earn an 18% premium over non-CFEs. For those CFEs with graduate degrees, the premium is even higher at 30%.
It is interesting to note that while a small group of participants have a two-year college degree, the CFE carries a signifi-
cant premium in this category (CFEs earn about 28% more than non-CFEs among these respondents).
Highest Level of
Education Completed
CFE Non-CFE
CFE
Premium
25th
percentile
Median
75th
percentile
25th
percentile
Median
75th
percentile
Based on
Median
Some college $60,000 $79,750 $100,300 $51,803 $67,000 $91,630 19%
Two-year university degree $68,400 $89,445 $112,250 $47,000 $70,000 $88,000 28%
Four-year university degree $68,000 $88,887 $120,000 $52,441 $75,250 $106,000 18%
Graduate or post-Graduate degree $69,000 $95,000 $133,000 $51,694 $72,970 $107,700 30%
2013/2014 Global Salary Study 11
Fraud Examiner
Median Total
Compensation
CFE Non-CFE
Level of responsibility
Supervisor / Senior Consultant $85,000 $73,863
Manager $89,000 $72,392
Staff / Consultant / Analyst $70,000 $60,875
Other $68,028 $57,000
Years of experience
1–2 years $67,100 $50,542
3–4 years $67,500 $52,195
5–9 years $77,667 $65,000
10–19 years $78,824 $71,500
20+ years $100,000 $82,000
Industry of primary area of focus or
concentration in 2012
Financial Institutions $72,750 $60,000
Government $82,999 $71,750
Health Care $78,000 $62,100
Insurance $80,650 $74,000
Law Enforcement $77,000 $61,000
Fraud Examiner and Internal Auditor
The two largest groups of survey participants based on primary job function are fraud examiners and internal auditors. The
following tables provide more detailed information for each of these groups based upon levels of responsibility, years of experi-
ence and primary industry or area of focus. The median total compensation in all categories is greater for CFEs than non-CFEs.
Internal Auditor
Median Total
Compensation
CFE Non-CFE
Level of responsibility
Director $128,000 $120,000
Supervisor / Senior
Consultant
$78,923 $79,800
Manager $100,000 $87,000
Staff / Consultant / Analyst $74,000 $64,200
Years of experience
1–2 years $75,000 $65,750
3–4 years $74,000 $71,600
5–9 years $87,200 $81,000
10–19 years $102,000 $90,000
20+ years $115,000 $98,874
Industry of primary area of focus or
concentration in 2012
Education $90,100 $80,777
Financial Institutions $84,750 $70,500
Government $85,000 $66,822
Health Care $92,000 $84,050
Insurance $84,834 $75,500
Manufacturing $104,250 $83,000
Services $90,713 $77,983
Compensation Ranges by Job Function
The following table illustrates the difference in compensation range among the survey participants based on their
primary job functions. In all of the job function categories, participants with the CFE earn a premium over their non-CFE
counterparts. This premium ranged from 9% (Controller) to 50% (Other Accounting/Finance), based on the median total
compensation for each job function.
Primary Job Function
CFE Non-CFE
CFE
Premium
25th
percentile
Median
75th
percentile
25th
percentile
Median
75th
percentile
Based on
Median
Fraud Examiner / Investigator $62,500 $81,375 $112,500 $50,000 $66,000 $83,000 23%
Internal Auditor $70,000 $90,200 $120,787 $57,000 $78,000 $108,000 16%
External Auditor $58,697 $76,378 $98,435 $49,375 $62,000 $78,955 23%
Forensic Accountant $83,750 $104,000 $150,000 $60,400 $85,000 $127,550 22%
CPA, CA or Equivalent $70,000 $95,000 $128,872 $57,875 $85,450 $128,521 11%
Controller $74,125 $97,500 $128,000 $57,862 $89,250 $120,000 9%
Other Accounting / Finance $60,000 $78,510 $98,671 $40,000 $52,500 $76,075 50%
Governance, Risk And Compliance $73,000 $99,400 $137,975 $51,140 $76,300 $108,000 30%
Corporate Management $102,250 $135,000 $184,875 $72,250 $110,000 $182,500 23%
Loss Prevention $75,375 $92,500 $120,250 $44,250 $61,519 $88,360 50%
Security Professional $82,000 $116,000 $150,000 $67,250 $102,000 $140,075 14%
Law Enforcement Officer $69,625 $99,000 $117,300 $54,000 $73,000 $89,113 36%
12 Compensation Guide for Anti-Fraud Professionals
Compensation Ranges by Primary Industry of Focus
Survey participants are segmented among 13 various industries (as well as an “other” category for industries not repre-
sented). Based on the median total income levels, CFEs in Manufacturing earn the most ($113,000), followed closely by
Law / Legal services ($111,250) and Management Consultants ($99,500). CFEs in Manufacturing also earned the highest
premium versus their non-CFE counterparts.
Primary Industry of Focus
CFE Non-CFE
CFE
Premium
25th
percentile
Median
75th
percentile
25th
percentile
Median
75th
percentile
Based on
Median
Education $67,800 $88,373 $110,328 $59,000 $85,000 $102,000 4%
Financial Institutions $63,000 $85,800 $127,954 $46,750 $65,995 $99,250 30%
Government $65,000 $83,935 $106,188 $54,508 $72,000 $96,100 17%
Health Care $68,000 $90,000 $123,250 $52,594 $68,493 $106,500 31%
Insurance $66,081 $85,000 $113,525 $56,000 $75,000 $100,000 13%
Law Enforcement $70,000 $96,000 $117,000 $54,000 $80,000 $105,000 20%
Law / Legal Services $83,037 $111,250 $158,750 $69,264 $93,000 $154,000 20%
Management Consultants $73,900 $99,500 $170,000 $60,000 $88,000 $150,000 13%
Manufacturing $83,006 $113,000 $152,712 $50,600 $71,600 $102,175 58%
Public / Chartered Accounting $62,375 $88,250 $129,750 $50,000 $63,700 $84,400 39%
Real Estate $59,750 $85,000 $116,375 $51,000 $72,000 $120,000 18%
Services $68,750 $92,000 $126,000 $56,375 $75,733 $100,250 21%
Non-Profit $63,435 $86,000 $124,500 $51,448 $70,000 $105,000 23%
Other $74,500 $98,000 $140,000 $52,825 $80,000 $120,000 23%
Make sure to visit ACFE.com/SalaryCenter to
access our salary calculator and other important
information about your individual compensation.
2013/2014 Global Salary Study 13
Compensation Ranges by Level of Responsibility
Among the two largest groups of participants according to level of responsibility — manager and staff/consultant/analyst
— the former earned a median salary of $95,650 for CFEs compared to $79,000 for non-CFEs, while the latter earned a
median salary of $71,900 for CFEs compared to $60,000 for non-CFEs.
Level of Responsibility
CFE Non-CFE
CFE
Premium
25th
percentile
Median
75th
percentile
25th
percentile
Median
75th
percentile
Based on
Median
Executive (C-Level) $100,000 $139,200 $200,000 $71,250 $124,000 $200,000 12%
Vice President $90,000 $133,000 $182,000 $77,000 $110,036 $180,000 21%
Partner / Principal $110,000 $155,500 $242,500 $88,000 $134,000 $225,000 16%
Director $95,000 $129,800 $168,500 $98,980 $120,000 $156,000 8%
Supervisor / Senior Consultant $66,000 $82,000 $105,619 $55,550 $76,983 $101,000 7%
Manager $74,000 $95,650 $120,000 $54,000 $79,000 $105,000 21%
Staff / Consultant / Analyst $58,000 $71,900 $90,000 $45,285 $60,000 $74,786 20%
Compensation Ranges by Fraud-Related Experience
Anti-fraud professionals with 10-19 years of fraud-related experience accounted for nearly 28% of all respondents,
making this the largest group based on experience level. For this category, the median total compensation for CFEs is
$100,000, compared with $80,000 for non-CFEs, representing a CFE pay premium of 25%.
Years of Fraud-Related Experience
CFE Non-CFE
CFE
Premium
25th
percentile
Median
75th
percentile
25th
percentile
Median
75th
percentile
Based on
Median
1–2 years $60,000 $73,000 $90,200 $48,500 $60,750 $88,250 20%
3–4 years $59,000 $74,250 $95,018 $44,068 $60,240 $84,500 23%
5–9 years $66,000 $88,638 $115,000 $51,335 $77,750 $107,719 14%
10–19 years $74,872 $100,000 $135,000 $60,000 $80,000 $120,000 25%
20+ years $89,373 $117,000 $155,000 $72,500 $104,000 $155,000 13%
CFEs with 10-19 years of fraud-related experience have a 25%
premium over non-CFEs with the same amount of experience.
14 Compensation Guide for Anti-Fraud Professionals
By Geographic Region
CFE Non-CFE
CFE
Premium
25th
percentile
Median
75th
percentile
25th
percentile
Median
75th
percentile
Based on
Median
U.S. $69,000 $90,000 $121,000 $55,000 $74,000 $105,000 22%
Canada $88,000 $102,000 $132,000 $69,650 $83,550 $112,650 22%
Europe $75,698 $115,500 $168,500 $60,000 $90,000 $122,000 28%
Other International $47,775 $81,750 $134,000 $35,294 $60,944 $93,500 34%
Respondent Geographic Profile
Geographic Representation
About 74% of the respondents indicated their primary office is located in the U.S. and the remaining 26% of respondents
are located outside the U.S.
U.S.
73.4%
Other International
58.9%
Europe
15.3%
International
26.6%
Canada
25.8%
overall geographic representation
by geographic region
U.S.
22.0%
Canada
22.0%
Europe
28.0%
Other International
34.0%
2013/2014 Global Salary Study 15
Regional Compensation Comparison
The table below shows the total cash compensation by U.S. regions for all respondents, broken down between CFEs
and non-CFEs. The largest concentration of study participants (both CFEs and non-CFEs) is in the South Atlantic, and the
lowest is in the New England area.
Every region reported a CFE compensation premium. The regions showing the highest premiums are the East North
Central Region at 35% followed by the South Atlantic and Mid-Atlantic at 28% and 25% respectively. Outside the U.S.
the compensation premium for CFEs is more than 33%.
Region CFE Non-CFE
New England
(ME, NH, VT, MA, RI, CT)
Total Median Compensation $87,000 $82,200
% of total CFE and Non-CFE Participants (All Regions) 4% 6%
% Breakdown of CFE vs. Non-CFE within the Region 72% 28%
Middle-Atlantic
(NY, NJ, PA)
Total Median Compensation $100,000 $80,000
% of total CFE and Non-CFE Participants (All Regions) 13% 16%
% Breakdown of CFE vs. Non-CFE within the Region 75% 25%
South Atlantic
(MD, WV, VA, DC, DE, NC, SC, GA, FL)
Total Median Compensation $90,160 $70,500
% of total CFE and Non-CFE Participants (All Regions) 24% 23%
% Breakdown of CFE vs. Non-CFE within the Region 79% 21%
East North Central
(WI, MI, IL, IN, OH)
Total Median Compensation $89,500 $66,144
% of total CFE and Non-CFE Participants (All Regions) 13% 11%
% Breakdown of CFE vs. Non-CFE within the Region 81% 19%
East South Central
(KY, TN, MS, AL)
Total Median Compensation $82,400 $66,000
% of total CFE and Non-CFE Participants (All Regions) 5% 4%
% Breakdown of CFE vs. Non-CFE within the Region 81% 19%
West North Central
(MN, ND, SD, NE, IA, MO, KS)
Total Median Compensation $80,775 $75,582
% of total CFE and Non-CFE Participants (All Regions) 6% 6%
% Breakdown of CFE vs. Non-CFE within the Region 77% 23%
West South Central
(AR, LA, OK, TX)
Total Median Compensation $89,000 $71,250
% of total CFE and Non-CFE Participants (All Regions) 13% 12%
% Breakdown of CFE vs. Non-CFE within the Region 80% 20%
Mountain
(ID, MT, WY, CO, NV, UT, NM, AZ)
Total Median Compensation $80,000 $67,500
% of total CFE and Non-CFE Participants (All Regions) 8% 9%
% Breakdown of CFE vs. Non-CFE within the Region 78% 22%
Pacific
(WA, OR, CA, AK, HI)
Total Median Compensation $98,245 $80,750
% of total CFE and Non-CFE Participants (All Regions) 13% 12%
% Breakdown of CFE vs. Non-CFE within the Region 80% 20%
Outside the U.S.
Total Median Compensation $100,000 $75,000
% of total CFE and Non-CFE Participants (All Non-U.S.) 59% 41%
16 Compensation Guide for Anti-Fraud Professionals
Respondent Benefits Profile
Benefits Information
The following table shows the benefits offered to participants in their current employment and how benefits are funded:
by the employee, employer or both. For major benefits, such as health insurance and dental insurance, the majority of
participants (both CFEs and non-CFEs) are enrolled in a joint contribution plan. For most benefits, there were only slight
differences between CFEs and non-CFEs in terms of funding. Statistically speaking, the largest differences were in edu-
cation funding and/or professional education (for CFEs, 39.5% fully paid by employer, compared to 34.1% for non-CFEs)
and professional society dues (for CFEs, 57.5% fully paid by employer, compared to 47% for non-CFEs).
Benefits Received (in current employment)
Paid Fully by
Employer
Paid Fully by
Employee
Joint
Contribution
Benefit Not
Provided
Health insurance (HMO, PPO, HSA)
CFE 20.1% 4.4% 67.8% 7.7%
Non-CFE 21.5% 5.4% 64.2% 9.0%
Dental insurance
CFE 15.1% 12.9% 56.9% 15.1%
Non-CFE 13.5% 12.0% 56.3% 18.1%
Disability insurance
CFE 31.9% 14.5% 36.5% 17.2%
Non-CFE 30.6% 13.5% 35.7% 20.2%
Professional liability insurance
CFE 32.4% 5.3% 7.6% 54.7%
Non-CFE 31.2% 7.1% 10.3% 51.4%
Education funding and/or professional education
CFE 42.9% 6.2% 31.8% 19.1%
Non-CFE 34.0% 7.9% 35.2% 22.9%
Professional society dues
CFE 60.3% 14.9% 8.1% 16.7%
Non-CFE 57.5% 14.2% 8.7% 19.6%
Child or elder care
CFE 2.7% 14.5% 9.6% 73.3%
Non-CFE 2.0% 15.7% 11.2% 71.2%
Employee assistance or wellness program
CFE 40.6% 5.6% 18.1% 35.7%
Non-CFE 39.5% 6.1% 18.8% 35.6%
Vehicle provided by employer
CFE 11.2% 4.8% 2.8% 81.2%
Non-CFE 10.1% 6.1% 3.4% 80.4%
Monthly auto allowance
CFE 8.2% 3.4% 2.0% 86.4%
Non-CFE 10.1% 5.3% 2.1% 82.6%
Mileage reimbursement
CFE 60.2% 4.6% 4.5% 30.8%
Non-CFE 58.8% 4.6% 4.3% 32.3%
Parking
CFE 43.5% 9.6% 5.0% 42.0%
Non-CFE 41.7% 10.6% 5.2% 42.5%
Cell phone
CFE 44.5% 7.1% 9.2% 39.3%
Non-CFE 40.9% 8.8% 9.6% 40.8%
2013/2014 Global Salary Study 17
Retirement Plans
As is the case with benefits, the survey results show that retirement plans are similar across the board between CFEs
and non-CFEs. The graph shows that defined contribution plans (i.e. 401(k), 403(b), Thrift Savings plans, etc.) are offered
to most participants (62.6% for CFEs and 47.9% for non-CFEs). Defined benefit (pension) plans are the next most com-
mon offering, as 40% of CFEs and 42.3% of non-CFEs receive pension plans.
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
Non-CFECFE
Other
retirement plans
Profit sharingDefined
contribution plan
Defined
benefit (pension)
retirement plan
No
retirement
plan offered
10.2%
40.0%
62.6%
8.2% 8.3%
17.3%
42.3%
47.9%
8.4% 7.9%
RETIREMENT PLANS OF RESPONDENTS
PERCENTOFRESPONDENTS
retirement plans
18 Compensation Guide for Anti-Fraud Professionals
Appendix
Survey Methodology
An email with a link to an online questionnaire was sent to approximately 60,000 ACFE members in late January 2013.
A total of 5,486 responses were received by the February deadline, representing a 9.1% response rate. Responses
received after the deadline and questionnaires with incomplete information were not included. Based on 5,486 presum-
ably random responses and 60,000 for the total population, this study has a +/- 1.3% margin of error (MOE) at a 95%
level of confidence. In other words, we can be 95% certain that for a question with 5,486 responses, the survey’s figure
would be within +/- 1.3% percentage points of the actual universe’s response. A margin of error of +/- 5% is typically
accepted as the “standard” in association research, so this study’s +/- 1.3% figure indicates a stronger than typical level
of statistical integrity.
Upon receipt, all questionnaires were assigned a confidential identification number, and any remaining identification
was removed from the survey form. All data were checked both manually and by a specially designed computer editing
procedure. Strict confidence of survey responses was maintained throughout the course of the project.
Definitions
Total annual compensation
The total annual compensation is comprised of such items as annual base pay (salary), commissions,
bonuses, profit sharing, etc.
Number of responses The number of responses in a particular grouping.
Average
The simple average of all responses for a particular item (e.g., it is the result of summing the values
and dividing by the total number of responses).
Median (or 50th percentile)
The center value of the total distribution of the data that was reported (e.g., it is the value at which
50% of the responses are above and 50% are below). This measure is less likely than an average to be
distorted by a few outlying responses.
25th percentile
The observation point below which 25% of the responses lie (e.g., 25% of the respondents earn less
than this amount and 75% earn more).
75th percentile
The observation point below which 75% of the responses lie (e.g., 75% of the respondents earn less
than this amount and 25% earn more).
Disclaimer
The statistical information contained in this report is believed to be representative of the individuals responding to the
survey. All reasonable efforts were taken by Industry Insights, Inc. to assure data comparability within the limitations of
reporting procedures. However, the data used in this report are not necessarily based on audited data, and the statistical
validity of any given number varies depending upon sample sizes and the amount of consistency among responses for
that particular figure. Industry Insights and ACFE, therefore, make no representations or warranties with respect to the
results of this study and shall not be liable to clients or anyone else for any information inaccuracies, or errors or omis-
sions in contents, regardless of the cause of such inaccuracy, error or omission. In no event shall Industry Insights and/or
ACFE be liable for any consequential damages.
2013/2014 Global Salary Study 19
About the ACFE
The ACFE is the world’s largest anti-fraud organization and the premier provider of
anti-fraud training and education. Together with more than 65,000 members, the ACFE
is reducing the incidence of fraud and white-collar crime worldwide and inspiring public
confidence in the integrity and objectivity within the profession.
Based in Austin, Texas, the ACFE was founded in 1988 by preeminent fraud expert and author, Dr. Joseph T. Wells, CFE,
CPA. Dr. Wells’ insight as an accountant-turned-FBI agent led to the formation of a common body of knowledge known
today as fraud examination.
Members of the ACFE include CPAs, auditors, lawyers, investigators, law enforcement officers, security professionals,
executives, managers and anyone whose job involves preventing, detecting or deterring fraud. The ACFE supports mem-
bers and the anti-fraud profession by providing conferences, seminars and other training events year-round, while also
offering self-study and online learning opportunities, manuals, software and other resources for fighting fraud.
Certified Fraud Examiners (CFEs)
The ACFE established and administers the Certified Fraud Examiner (CFE) credential.
Globally preferred by employers, the CFE credential denotes proven expertise in fraud
prevention, detection, deterrence and investigation. Members with the CFE credential
gain a professional advantage and quickly position themselves as leaders in the global
anti-fraud community.
For more information about the ACFE and Certified Fraud Examiners, visit ACFE.com.
CERTIFIED FRAUD
EXAMINER
The ACFE is the world’s
largest anti-fraud
organization and the
premier provider of
anti-fraud training
and education.
©2013 Association of Certified Fraud Examiners.
Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, ACFE, the ACFE logo, the ACFE
Seal, Certified Fraud Examiner and CFE are trademarks owned by the
Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc.
GLOBAL Headquarters • the gregor building
716 West Avenue • Austin, TX 78701-2727 • USA
Phone: (800) 245-3321 / +1 (512) 478-9000
info@ACFE.com • ACFE.com
Share this guide:

Contenu connexe

Tendances

Legal department survey 2012. europe, middle east & africa
Legal department survey 2012. europe, middle east & africaLegal department survey 2012. europe, middle east & africa
Legal department survey 2012. europe, middle east & africaLaurence Simons International
 
Aon - Employee Benefit Risks
Aon - Employee Benefit RisksAon - Employee Benefit Risks
Aon - Employee Benefit RisksAlonsoTello
 
2010 - 2011 Bermuda Salary Trends Report
2010 - 2011 Bermuda Salary Trends Report2010 - 2011 Bermuda Salary Trends Report
2010 - 2011 Bermuda Salary Trends Reportedharewood
 
2016 - IQPC - The key to raising awareness and comprehension
2016 - IQPC - The key to raising awareness and comprehension2016 - IQPC - The key to raising awareness and comprehension
2016 - IQPC - The key to raising awareness and comprehensionDr Darren O'Connell AGIA
 
The Real Talent Debate: Will Boomers Deplete the Workforce?
The Real Talent Debate:  Will Boomers Deplete the Workforce?The Real Talent Debate:  Will Boomers Deplete the Workforce?
The Real Talent Debate: Will Boomers Deplete the Workforce?FlexPaths
 
SHRM Survey Findings: 2013 Employer Perspectives on Disability Benefits--Exec...
SHRM Survey Findings: 2013 Employer Perspectives on Disability Benefits--Exec...SHRM Survey Findings: 2013 Employer Perspectives on Disability Benefits--Exec...
SHRM Survey Findings: 2013 Employer Perspectives on Disability Benefits--Exec...shrm
 
Route Fifty: 2016 Top Management Challenges for State & Local Government - Co...
Route Fifty: 2016 Top Management Challenges for State & Local Government - Co...Route Fifty: 2016 Top Management Challenges for State & Local Government - Co...
Route Fifty: 2016 Top Management Challenges for State & Local Government - Co...Gov BizCouncil
 
Fraud Risk Management - High Level Perspective for the Board of Directors
Fraud Risk Management - High Level Perspective for the Board of DirectorsFraud Risk Management - High Level Perspective for the Board of Directors
Fraud Risk Management - High Level Perspective for the Board of DirectorsZeeshan Shahid
 
Fraud investigations session 1 slides
Fraud investigations session 1 slidesFraud investigations session 1 slides
Fraud investigations session 1 slidesZeeshan Shahid
 
Role of Internal Audit in fraud prevention and detection
Role of Internal Audit in fraud prevention and detectionRole of Internal Audit in fraud prevention and detection
Role of Internal Audit in fraud prevention and detectionZeeshan Shahid
 
Fraud investigations session 2 slides
Fraud investigations session 2 slidesFraud investigations session 2 slides
Fraud investigations session 2 slidesZeeshan Shahid
 
SHRM Survey Findings: 2013 Employer Perspectives on Disability Benefits--Base...
SHRM Survey Findings: 2013 Employer Perspectives on Disability Benefits--Base...SHRM Survey Findings: 2013 Employer Perspectives on Disability Benefits--Base...
SHRM Survey Findings: 2013 Employer Perspectives on Disability Benefits--Base...shrm
 
Recruitment Automation Benefits
Recruitment Automation BenefitsRecruitment Automation Benefits
Recruitment Automation BenefitsValuehire
 
2016 - IQPC - Understanding and Assessing Corruption Risk
2016 - IQPC - Understanding and Assessing Corruption Risk2016 - IQPC - Understanding and Assessing Corruption Risk
2016 - IQPC - Understanding and Assessing Corruption RiskDr Darren O'Connell AGIA
 

Tendances (16)

Legal department survey 2012. europe, middle east & africa
Legal department survey 2012. europe, middle east & africaLegal department survey 2012. europe, middle east & africa
Legal department survey 2012. europe, middle east & africa
 
Aon - Employee Benefit Risks
Aon - Employee Benefit RisksAon - Employee Benefit Risks
Aon - Employee Benefit Risks
 
2010 - 2011 Bermuda Salary Trends Report
2010 - 2011 Bermuda Salary Trends Report2010 - 2011 Bermuda Salary Trends Report
2010 - 2011 Bermuda Salary Trends Report
 
2016 - IQPC - The key to raising awareness and comprehension
2016 - IQPC - The key to raising awareness and comprehension2016 - IQPC - The key to raising awareness and comprehension
2016 - IQPC - The key to raising awareness and comprehension
 
The Real Talent Debate: Will Boomers Deplete the Workforce?
The Real Talent Debate:  Will Boomers Deplete the Workforce?The Real Talent Debate:  Will Boomers Deplete the Workforce?
The Real Talent Debate: Will Boomers Deplete the Workforce?
 
SHRM Survey Findings: 2013 Employer Perspectives on Disability Benefits--Exec...
SHRM Survey Findings: 2013 Employer Perspectives on Disability Benefits--Exec...SHRM Survey Findings: 2013 Employer Perspectives on Disability Benefits--Exec...
SHRM Survey Findings: 2013 Employer Perspectives on Disability Benefits--Exec...
 
Route Fifty: 2016 Top Management Challenges for State & Local Government - Co...
Route Fifty: 2016 Top Management Challenges for State & Local Government - Co...Route Fifty: 2016 Top Management Challenges for State & Local Government - Co...
Route Fifty: 2016 Top Management Challenges for State & Local Government - Co...
 
The Business Case For 401k
The Business Case For 401kThe Business Case For 401k
The Business Case For 401k
 
Fraud Risk Management - High Level Perspective for the Board of Directors
Fraud Risk Management - High Level Perspective for the Board of DirectorsFraud Risk Management - High Level Perspective for the Board of Directors
Fraud Risk Management - High Level Perspective for the Board of Directors
 
Fraud investigations session 1 slides
Fraud investigations session 1 slidesFraud investigations session 1 slides
Fraud investigations session 1 slides
 
Role of Internal Audit in fraud prevention and detection
Role of Internal Audit in fraud prevention and detectionRole of Internal Audit in fraud prevention and detection
Role of Internal Audit in fraud prevention and detection
 
Fraud investigations session 2 slides
Fraud investigations session 2 slidesFraud investigations session 2 slides
Fraud investigations session 2 slides
 
SHRM Survey Findings: 2013 Employer Perspectives on Disability Benefits--Base...
SHRM Survey Findings: 2013 Employer Perspectives on Disability Benefits--Base...SHRM Survey Findings: 2013 Employer Perspectives on Disability Benefits--Base...
SHRM Survey Findings: 2013 Employer Perspectives on Disability Benefits--Base...
 
WMA Risk Survey 2016
WMA Risk Survey 2016WMA Risk Survey 2016
WMA Risk Survey 2016
 
Recruitment Automation Benefits
Recruitment Automation BenefitsRecruitment Automation Benefits
Recruitment Automation Benefits
 
2016 - IQPC - Understanding and Assessing Corruption Risk
2016 - IQPC - Understanding and Assessing Corruption Risk2016 - IQPC - Understanding and Assessing Corruption Risk
2016 - IQPC - Understanding and Assessing Corruption Risk
 

En vedette

SIICEX - Guia de mercado Colombia
SIICEX - Guia de mercado ColombiaSIICEX - Guia de mercado Colombia
SIICEX - Guia de mercado ColombiaHernani Larrea
 
5 2 q09 results presentation
5   2 q09 results presentation5   2 q09 results presentation
5 2 q09 results presentationCteep
 
15 Great Winter Coats for Kids
15 Great Winter Coats for Kids15 Great Winter Coats for Kids
15 Great Winter Coats for KidsMykidstime Ltd
 
ESDS_Corporate_Presentation
ESDS_Corporate_PresentationESDS_Corporate_Presentation
ESDS_Corporate_PresentationAnand Pagare
 
Missions pp presentation 11 29-2012
Missions pp presentation 11 29-2012Missions pp presentation 11 29-2012
Missions pp presentation 11 29-2012jrhittman
 
Bi za pr - KT - LMS 162
Bi za pr - KT - LMS 162Bi za pr - KT - LMS 162
Bi za pr - KT - LMS 162Stripovi Klub
 
ALSO Company Presentation 2015
ALSO Company Presentation 2015ALSO Company Presentation 2015
ALSO Company Presentation 2015Ari Rikkilä
 
Firstcall recommend KEC after net profit rises 83.09% y/y
Firstcall recommend KEC after net profit rises 83.09% y/yFirstcall recommend KEC after net profit rises 83.09% y/y
Firstcall recommend KEC after net profit rises 83.09% y/yIndiaNotes.com
 
Project Maps & List: Draft 2040 Regional Transportation Plan
 Project Maps & List: Draft 2040 Regional Transportation Plan Project Maps & List: Draft 2040 Regional Transportation Plan
Project Maps & List: Draft 2040 Regional Transportation PlanCHCRPA
 
ESDS_Corporate_Presentation
ESDS_Corporate_PresentationESDS_Corporate_Presentation
ESDS_Corporate_PresentationPravin Sonawane
 
Catedra 1rose maguire
Catedra 1rose maguireCatedra 1rose maguire
Catedra 1rose maguireuamericas
 
Cdc guideto writingforsocialmedia
Cdc guideto writingforsocialmediaCdc guideto writingforsocialmedia
Cdc guideto writingforsocialmediaPNMI
 
Deutsche EuroShop Interim Report Q1 2009
Deutsche EuroShop Interim Report Q1 2009Deutsche EuroShop Interim Report Q1 2009
Deutsche EuroShop Interim Report Q1 2009Deutsche EuroShop AG
 
Doc testo 330 0982 7963
Doc testo 330 0982 7963Doc testo 330 0982 7963
Doc testo 330 0982 7963Europages2
 

En vedette (20)

SIICEX - Guia de mercado Colombia
SIICEX - Guia de mercado ColombiaSIICEX - Guia de mercado Colombia
SIICEX - Guia de mercado Colombia
 
5 2 q09 results presentation
5   2 q09 results presentation5   2 q09 results presentation
5 2 q09 results presentation
 
15 Great Winter Coats for Kids
15 Great Winter Coats for Kids15 Great Winter Coats for Kids
15 Great Winter Coats for Kids
 
ESDS_Corporate_Presentation
ESDS_Corporate_PresentationESDS_Corporate_Presentation
ESDS_Corporate_Presentation
 
Missions pp presentation 11 29-2012
Missions pp presentation 11 29-2012Missions pp presentation 11 29-2012
Missions pp presentation 11 29-2012
 
Bi za pr - KT - LMS 162
Bi za pr - KT - LMS 162Bi za pr - KT - LMS 162
Bi za pr - KT - LMS 162
 
Rustlick Catalog
Rustlick CatalogRustlick Catalog
Rustlick Catalog
 
ALSO Company Presentation 2015
ALSO Company Presentation 2015ALSO Company Presentation 2015
ALSO Company Presentation 2015
 
Budgeting entitlements
Budgeting entitlementsBudgeting entitlements
Budgeting entitlements
 
Firstcall recommend KEC after net profit rises 83.09% y/y
Firstcall recommend KEC after net profit rises 83.09% y/yFirstcall recommend KEC after net profit rises 83.09% y/y
Firstcall recommend KEC after net profit rises 83.09% y/y
 
Project Maps & List: Draft 2040 Regional Transportation Plan
 Project Maps & List: Draft 2040 Regional Transportation Plan Project Maps & List: Draft 2040 Regional Transportation Plan
Project Maps & List: Draft 2040 Regional Transportation Plan
 
Proyek 3
Proyek 3Proyek 3
Proyek 3
 
Naxos-Neuheiten im Mai 2013
Naxos-Neuheiten im Mai 2013Naxos-Neuheiten im Mai 2013
Naxos-Neuheiten im Mai 2013
 
ESDS_Corporate_Presentation
ESDS_Corporate_PresentationESDS_Corporate_Presentation
ESDS_Corporate_Presentation
 
Catedra 1rose maguire
Catedra 1rose maguireCatedra 1rose maguire
Catedra 1rose maguire
 
Cdc guideto writingforsocialmedia
Cdc guideto writingforsocialmediaCdc guideto writingforsocialmedia
Cdc guideto writingforsocialmedia
 
Storm Sandy
Storm SandyStorm Sandy
Storm Sandy
 
Deutsche EuroShop Interim Report Q1 2009
Deutsche EuroShop Interim Report Q1 2009Deutsche EuroShop Interim Report Q1 2009
Deutsche EuroShop Interim Report Q1 2009
 
Doc testo 330 0982 7963
Doc testo 330 0982 7963Doc testo 330 0982 7963
Doc testo 330 0982 7963
 
Landsat calibration summary_rse
Landsat calibration summary_rseLandsat calibration summary_rse
Landsat calibration summary_rse
 

Similaire à 2013 ACFE Compensation Guide

BWD Salary Census 2014-2015
BWD Salary Census 2014-2015BWD Salary Census 2014-2015
BWD Salary Census 2014-2015Irene Padrón
 
Bwd salary census 2014 2015
Bwd salary census 2014 2015Bwd salary census 2014 2015
Bwd salary census 2014 2015Gareth Davies
 
Fei 2013 compensation survey
Fei 2013 compensation surveyFei 2013 compensation survey
Fei 2013 compensation surveyBill Velasco
 
Digital Salary and Industry Insights 6th Edition
Digital Salary and Industry Insights 6th EditionDigital Salary and Industry Insights 6th Edition
Digital Salary and Industry Insights 6th EditionAlex Straw
 
Workers' Compensation Survey 2016 - Results
Workers' Compensation Survey 2016 - ResultsWorkers' Compensation Survey 2016 - Results
Workers' Compensation Survey 2016 - ResultsJonathan Belek
 
Workers' compensation survey 2016
Workers' compensation survey 2016Workers' compensation survey 2016
Workers' compensation survey 2016Jonathan Belek
 
Navigating todays complex_business_risks
Navigating todays complex_business_risksNavigating todays complex_business_risks
Navigating todays complex_business_risksntpinto
 
2021benchmark survey-hires
2021benchmark survey-hires2021benchmark survey-hires
2021benchmark survey-hiresgguinle
 
Digital salary and industry insights report, 7th edition
Digital salary and industry insights report, 7th editionDigital salary and industry insights report, 7th edition
Digital salary and industry insights report, 7th editionAlex Straw
 
TACCT 521 Group Paper - SEND TO GROUP
TACCT 521 Group Paper - SEND TO GROUPTACCT 521 Group Paper - SEND TO GROUP
TACCT 521 Group Paper - SEND TO GROUPCaron Schmidt
 
Instructions for assignment reflect on your professional experA
Instructions for assignment reflect on your professional experAInstructions for assignment reflect on your professional experA
Instructions for assignment reflect on your professional experAssuser47f0be
 
ESIQ_2015_survey_final042415
ESIQ_2015_survey_final042415ESIQ_2015_survey_final042415
ESIQ_2015_survey_final042415Nick Fishman
 
Wp 2019 security_awareness_report
Wp 2019 security_awareness_reportWp 2019 security_awareness_report
Wp 2019 security_awareness_reportMohamedAlYemani1
 
2013 AESC Compensation Survey Summary Final
2013 AESC Compensation Survey Summary Final2013 AESC Compensation Survey Summary Final
2013 AESC Compensation Survey Summary FinalLukáš Havlín
 
Claymore Partners Memorial Day 2015 Executive Talent Survey Results
Claymore Partners Memorial Day 2015 Executive Talent Survey ResultsClaymore Partners Memorial Day 2015 Executive Talent Survey Results
Claymore Partners Memorial Day 2015 Executive Talent Survey Resultsslandberg
 
How to Increase Your Bottom-Line Using Matchmaking Algorithms
How to Increase Your Bottom-Line Using Matchmaking AlgorithmsHow to Increase Your Bottom-Line Using Matchmaking Algorithms
How to Increase Your Bottom-Line Using Matchmaking AlgorithmsMinal Joshi Jaeckli
 

Similaire à 2013 ACFE Compensation Guide (20)

Bwd salary census 2014 2015
Bwd salary census 2014 2015Bwd salary census 2014 2015
Bwd salary census 2014 2015
 
BWD Salary Census 2014-2015
BWD Salary Census 2014-2015BWD Salary Census 2014-2015
BWD Salary Census 2014-2015
 
BWD salary census 2014
BWD salary census 2014 BWD salary census 2014
BWD salary census 2014
 
Bwd salary census 2014 2015
Bwd salary census 2014 2015Bwd salary census 2014 2015
Bwd salary census 2014 2015
 
Bwd salary census 2014 2015
Bwd salary census 2014 2015Bwd salary census 2014 2015
Bwd salary census 2014 2015
 
Fei 2013 compensation survey
Fei 2013 compensation surveyFei 2013 compensation survey
Fei 2013 compensation survey
 
Digital Salary and Industry Insights 6th Edition
Digital Salary and Industry Insights 6th EditionDigital Salary and Industry Insights 6th Edition
Digital Salary and Industry Insights 6th Edition
 
Workers' Compensation Survey 2016 - Results
Workers' Compensation Survey 2016 - ResultsWorkers' Compensation Survey 2016 - Results
Workers' Compensation Survey 2016 - Results
 
Workers' compensation survey 2016
Workers' compensation survey 2016Workers' compensation survey 2016
Workers' compensation survey 2016
 
Navigating todays complex_business_risks
Navigating todays complex_business_risksNavigating todays complex_business_risks
Navigating todays complex_business_risks
 
2021benchmark survey-hires
2021benchmark survey-hires2021benchmark survey-hires
2021benchmark survey-hires
 
CIPR State of the Profession 2013/14
CIPR State of the Profession 2013/14CIPR State of the Profession 2013/14
CIPR State of the Profession 2013/14
 
Digital salary and industry insights report, 7th edition
Digital salary and industry insights report, 7th editionDigital salary and industry insights report, 7th edition
Digital salary and industry insights report, 7th edition
 
TACCT 521 Group Paper - SEND TO GROUP
TACCT 521 Group Paper - SEND TO GROUPTACCT 521 Group Paper - SEND TO GROUP
TACCT 521 Group Paper - SEND TO GROUP
 
Instructions for assignment reflect on your professional experA
Instructions for assignment reflect on your professional experAInstructions for assignment reflect on your professional experA
Instructions for assignment reflect on your professional experA
 
ESIQ_2015_survey_final042415
ESIQ_2015_survey_final042415ESIQ_2015_survey_final042415
ESIQ_2015_survey_final042415
 
Wp 2019 security_awareness_report
Wp 2019 security_awareness_reportWp 2019 security_awareness_report
Wp 2019 security_awareness_report
 
2013 AESC Compensation Survey Summary Final
2013 AESC Compensation Survey Summary Final2013 AESC Compensation Survey Summary Final
2013 AESC Compensation Survey Summary Final
 
Claymore Partners Memorial Day 2015 Executive Talent Survey Results
Claymore Partners Memorial Day 2015 Executive Talent Survey ResultsClaymore Partners Memorial Day 2015 Executive Talent Survey Results
Claymore Partners Memorial Day 2015 Executive Talent Survey Results
 
How to Increase Your Bottom-Line Using Matchmaking Algorithms
How to Increase Your Bottom-Line Using Matchmaking AlgorithmsHow to Increase Your Bottom-Line Using Matchmaking Algorithms
How to Increase Your Bottom-Line Using Matchmaking Algorithms
 

Dernier

Separation of Lanthanides/ Lanthanides and Actinides
Separation of Lanthanides/ Lanthanides and ActinidesSeparation of Lanthanides/ Lanthanides and Actinides
Separation of Lanthanides/ Lanthanides and ActinidesFatimaKhan178732
 
POINT- BIOCHEMISTRY SEM 2 ENZYMES UNIT 5.pptx
POINT- BIOCHEMISTRY SEM 2 ENZYMES UNIT 5.pptxPOINT- BIOCHEMISTRY SEM 2 ENZYMES UNIT 5.pptx
POINT- BIOCHEMISTRY SEM 2 ENZYMES UNIT 5.pptxSayali Powar
 
PSYCHIATRIC History collection FORMAT.pptx
PSYCHIATRIC   History collection FORMAT.pptxPSYCHIATRIC   History collection FORMAT.pptx
PSYCHIATRIC History collection FORMAT.pptxPoojaSen20
 
Paris 2024 Olympic Geographies - an activity
Paris 2024 Olympic Geographies - an activityParis 2024 Olympic Geographies - an activity
Paris 2024 Olympic Geographies - an activityGeoBlogs
 
_Math 4-Q4 Week 5.pptx Steps in Collecting Data
_Math 4-Q4 Week 5.pptx Steps in Collecting Data_Math 4-Q4 Week 5.pptx Steps in Collecting Data
_Math 4-Q4 Week 5.pptx Steps in Collecting DataJhengPantaleon
 
CARE OF CHILD IN INCUBATOR..........pptx
CARE OF CHILD IN INCUBATOR..........pptxCARE OF CHILD IN INCUBATOR..........pptx
CARE OF CHILD IN INCUBATOR..........pptxGaneshChakor2
 
The Most Excellent Way | 1 Corinthians 13
The Most Excellent Way | 1 Corinthians 13The Most Excellent Way | 1 Corinthians 13
The Most Excellent Way | 1 Corinthians 13Steve Thomason
 
Call Girls in Dwarka Mor Delhi Contact Us 9654467111
Call Girls in Dwarka Mor Delhi Contact Us 9654467111Call Girls in Dwarka Mor Delhi Contact Us 9654467111
Call Girls in Dwarka Mor Delhi Contact Us 9654467111Sapana Sha
 
microwave assisted reaction. General introduction
microwave assisted reaction. General introductionmicrowave assisted reaction. General introduction
microwave assisted reaction. General introductionMaksud Ahmed
 
Q4-W6-Restating Informational Text Grade 3
Q4-W6-Restating Informational Text Grade 3Q4-W6-Restating Informational Text Grade 3
Q4-W6-Restating Informational Text Grade 3JemimahLaneBuaron
 
mini mental status format.docx
mini    mental       status     format.docxmini    mental       status     format.docx
mini mental status format.docxPoojaSen20
 
SOCIAL AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT - LFTVD.pptx
SOCIAL AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT - LFTVD.pptxSOCIAL AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT - LFTVD.pptx
SOCIAL AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT - LFTVD.pptxiammrhaywood
 
Kisan Call Centre - To harness potential of ICT in Agriculture by answer farm...
Kisan Call Centre - To harness potential of ICT in Agriculture by answer farm...Kisan Call Centre - To harness potential of ICT in Agriculture by answer farm...
Kisan Call Centre - To harness potential of ICT in Agriculture by answer farm...Krashi Coaching
 
A Critique of the Proposed National Education Policy Reform
A Critique of the Proposed National Education Policy ReformA Critique of the Proposed National Education Policy Reform
A Critique of the Proposed National Education Policy ReformChameera Dedduwage
 
Presiding Officer Training module 2024 lok sabha elections
Presiding Officer Training module 2024 lok sabha electionsPresiding Officer Training module 2024 lok sabha elections
Presiding Officer Training module 2024 lok sabha electionsanshu789521
 
Software Engineering Methodologies (overview)
Software Engineering Methodologies (overview)Software Engineering Methodologies (overview)
Software Engineering Methodologies (overview)eniolaolutunde
 
Industrial Policy - 1948, 1956, 1973, 1977, 1980, 1991
Industrial Policy - 1948, 1956, 1973, 1977, 1980, 1991Industrial Policy - 1948, 1956, 1973, 1977, 1980, 1991
Industrial Policy - 1948, 1956, 1973, 1977, 1980, 1991RKavithamani
 
Employee wellbeing at the workplace.pptx
Employee wellbeing at the workplace.pptxEmployee wellbeing at the workplace.pptx
Employee wellbeing at the workplace.pptxNirmalaLoungPoorunde1
 

Dernier (20)

Separation of Lanthanides/ Lanthanides and Actinides
Separation of Lanthanides/ Lanthanides and ActinidesSeparation of Lanthanides/ Lanthanides and Actinides
Separation of Lanthanides/ Lanthanides and Actinides
 
POINT- BIOCHEMISTRY SEM 2 ENZYMES UNIT 5.pptx
POINT- BIOCHEMISTRY SEM 2 ENZYMES UNIT 5.pptxPOINT- BIOCHEMISTRY SEM 2 ENZYMES UNIT 5.pptx
POINT- BIOCHEMISTRY SEM 2 ENZYMES UNIT 5.pptx
 
PSYCHIATRIC History collection FORMAT.pptx
PSYCHIATRIC   History collection FORMAT.pptxPSYCHIATRIC   History collection FORMAT.pptx
PSYCHIATRIC History collection FORMAT.pptx
 
Paris 2024 Olympic Geographies - an activity
Paris 2024 Olympic Geographies - an activityParis 2024 Olympic Geographies - an activity
Paris 2024 Olympic Geographies - an activity
 
_Math 4-Q4 Week 5.pptx Steps in Collecting Data
_Math 4-Q4 Week 5.pptx Steps in Collecting Data_Math 4-Q4 Week 5.pptx Steps in Collecting Data
_Math 4-Q4 Week 5.pptx Steps in Collecting Data
 
CARE OF CHILD IN INCUBATOR..........pptx
CARE OF CHILD IN INCUBATOR..........pptxCARE OF CHILD IN INCUBATOR..........pptx
CARE OF CHILD IN INCUBATOR..........pptx
 
The Most Excellent Way | 1 Corinthians 13
The Most Excellent Way | 1 Corinthians 13The Most Excellent Way | 1 Corinthians 13
The Most Excellent Way | 1 Corinthians 13
 
Call Girls in Dwarka Mor Delhi Contact Us 9654467111
Call Girls in Dwarka Mor Delhi Contact Us 9654467111Call Girls in Dwarka Mor Delhi Contact Us 9654467111
Call Girls in Dwarka Mor Delhi Contact Us 9654467111
 
microwave assisted reaction. General introduction
microwave assisted reaction. General introductionmicrowave assisted reaction. General introduction
microwave assisted reaction. General introduction
 
Q4-W6-Restating Informational Text Grade 3
Q4-W6-Restating Informational Text Grade 3Q4-W6-Restating Informational Text Grade 3
Q4-W6-Restating Informational Text Grade 3
 
Model Call Girl in Bikash Puri Delhi reach out to us at 🔝9953056974🔝
Model Call Girl in Bikash Puri  Delhi reach out to us at 🔝9953056974🔝Model Call Girl in Bikash Puri  Delhi reach out to us at 🔝9953056974🔝
Model Call Girl in Bikash Puri Delhi reach out to us at 🔝9953056974🔝
 
Código Creativo y Arte de Software | Unidad 1
Código Creativo y Arte de Software | Unidad 1Código Creativo y Arte de Software | Unidad 1
Código Creativo y Arte de Software | Unidad 1
 
mini mental status format.docx
mini    mental       status     format.docxmini    mental       status     format.docx
mini mental status format.docx
 
SOCIAL AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT - LFTVD.pptx
SOCIAL AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT - LFTVD.pptxSOCIAL AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT - LFTVD.pptx
SOCIAL AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT - LFTVD.pptx
 
Kisan Call Centre - To harness potential of ICT in Agriculture by answer farm...
Kisan Call Centre - To harness potential of ICT in Agriculture by answer farm...Kisan Call Centre - To harness potential of ICT in Agriculture by answer farm...
Kisan Call Centre - To harness potential of ICT in Agriculture by answer farm...
 
A Critique of the Proposed National Education Policy Reform
A Critique of the Proposed National Education Policy ReformA Critique of the Proposed National Education Policy Reform
A Critique of the Proposed National Education Policy Reform
 
Presiding Officer Training module 2024 lok sabha elections
Presiding Officer Training module 2024 lok sabha electionsPresiding Officer Training module 2024 lok sabha elections
Presiding Officer Training module 2024 lok sabha elections
 
Software Engineering Methodologies (overview)
Software Engineering Methodologies (overview)Software Engineering Methodologies (overview)
Software Engineering Methodologies (overview)
 
Industrial Policy - 1948, 1956, 1973, 1977, 1980, 1991
Industrial Policy - 1948, 1956, 1973, 1977, 1980, 1991Industrial Policy - 1948, 1956, 1973, 1977, 1980, 1991
Industrial Policy - 1948, 1956, 1973, 1977, 1980, 1991
 
Employee wellbeing at the workplace.pptx
Employee wellbeing at the workplace.pptxEmployee wellbeing at the workplace.pptx
Employee wellbeing at the workplace.pptx
 

2013 ACFE Compensation Guide

  • 1. 2013/2014 Global Salary Study compensation guide f o r a n t i - f r a u d p r o f e ss i o n a l s
  • 2. 2 Compensation Guide for Anti-Fraud Professionals Compensation Guide for Anti-Fraud Professionals Table of Contents INTRODUCTION About This Report...............................................................4 Highlighted Trends..............................................................5 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Respondent Personal and Professional Profile Age-Range of Participants...................................................6 Gender.................................................................................6 Education Information.........................................................7 CFEs vs. Non-CFEs..............................................................7 Years of Fraud-Related Experience......................................8 Level of Professional Responsibility....................................8 Respondent Compensation Profile Median Total Compensation...............................................9 CFE vs. Non-CFE Compensation.........................................9 Compensation by Age and Gender...................................10 Compensation by Education Level....................................10 Compensation by Job Function........................................11 Fraud Examiner and Internal Auditor.................................11 Compensation by Primary Industry of Focus......................12 Compensation by Level of Responsibility.........................13 Compensation by Years of Fraud-Related Experience �������13 Respondent Geographic Profile Geographic Representation...............................................14 Regional Compensation Comparison................................15 Respondent Benefits Profile Benefits Information..........................................................16 Retirement Plans...............................................................17 APPENDIX Survey Methodology.........................................................18 About the ACFE.................................................................19
  • 3. 2013/2014 Global Salary Study 3 Letter from the President and CEO As an anti-fraud professional, how does your level of compensation compare with that of your peers? Are you armed with the information you need to ensure your career is moving in the right direction? The statistics presented in this 2013/2014 Compensation Guide for Anti-Fraud Professionals represent an ongoing effort to gather the data needed to help you answer these and other important questions. Collected and analyzed by an independent research group, the results provide benchmarks specific to the anti-fraud profession regarding salary, benefits and other compensation — weighed against factors such as industry, job role, professional credentials, experience, geographic location and other qualifiers. It has been two years since the last Compensation Guide, and since that time, the anti-fraud profession has continued to evolve. Fraud is clearly a global problem, and fraud fighters are in demand by organizations world- wide. In this latest study, international participation increased from 20 percent to nearly 27 percent. This is likely a reflection of the increasing number of fraud fighters filling the global ranks of the anti-fraud profession. Once again, the data shows that being recognized as an expert in the field increasingly correlates to a significantly higher level of compensation. The study finds that individuals with the Certified Fraud Examiner (CFE) credential earn 25 percent more than their non-certified peers. This marks an increase from the 22 percent premium reported just two years ago. An equally eye-opening statistic: Of the individuals who identified their level of responsibility as Executive (C-Level), nearly 80 percent have the CFE credential. I am pleased to introduce something new with this year’s Compensation Guide: an online salary calculator that allows you to compare your com- pensation to peers in industry, job function and level of responsibility. This feature has been added as part of our effort to make it easy for you to know where you stand in relation to your colleagues in the profession and give you information you can use when negotiating with supervisors or potential employers. I hope you find the information in this Compensation Guide as interesting and enlightening as I do. Most importantly, thank you to all who submitted data for this study — this guide would not have been possible without you. Sincerely, James D. Ratley, CFE President and CEO As an anti-fraud professional, how does your level of compensation compare with that of your peers?
  • 4. 4 Compensation Guide for Anti-Fraud Professionals The Association of Certified Fraud Examiners has com- pleted the 2013/2014 Compensation Guide for Anti-Fraud Professionals. The information contained in this report represents complete, accurate and up-to-date compen- sation data for the anti-fraud profession. The report is broken down by personal, professional, compensation, geographic and benefits profiles, and is designed to allow individuals to easily compare their compensation levels and benefits with their peers. This guide is based on research conducted by profession- al research firm Industry Insights, Inc. for the ACFE. The compensation data has been aggregated in the following categories by CFEs vs. non-CFEs so individuals can com- pare their own data to the results of their peers. These aggregations include: ❙❙ All Respondents (CFEs vs. non-CFEs) ❙❙ Job Function ❙❙ Primary Industry of Focus ❙❙ Highest Level of Education Completed ❙❙ Age and Gender ❙❙ Years of Fraud-Related Experience ❙❙ Level of Responsibility ❙❙ Geographic Region As an individual compares his or her compensation information to that of others in the anti-fraud profession, it is important to remember that the statistics published in this report should be regarded as guidelines rather than absolute standards. Because organizations will differ depending upon their location, size and other factors, any two organizations may offer very different compensation packages. For example, duration of employment and nature of prior experience will obviously influence the compensation offering for a particular individual. Thus, a deviation between anyone’s compensation and a number appearing on a table in this report is not necessarily good or bad; it is merely an indication that additional scrutiny may be warranted. In addition to compensation data, the survey collected information on benefits including insurance, professional development/personal benefits and retirement plans. We are proud to present the enclosed insights into the compensation and benefits policies for the anti-fraud professional. Introduction About This Report Make sure to visit ACFE.com/SalaryCenter to access our salary calculator and other important information about your individual compensation.
  • 5. 2013/2014 Global Salary Study 5 ❙❙ CFEs continue to earn a significant premium over those without the credential. The results of this year’s survey found that CFEs earn 25% more than their non-certified counterparts. ❙❙ Overall, compensation levels across most industries remained relatively unchanged since the 2010/2011 Compensation Guide. The overall median compensation reported is representative of this economic trend. ❙❙ Governance, Risk and Compliance, Loss Prevention and Law Enforcement Officer were among the top ranking job functions that showed the highest median salary advantage for having the CFE credential, with CFEs earning 30-50% more than non-CFEs. ❙❙ In the U.S., almost every geographical region reported that having the CFE credential increased their earning potential. CFEs in the East North Central U.S. region reported the highest salary premiums, earning 35% more than non-CFEs. ❙❙ More than 26% of respondents are international. International CFEs outside Canada and Europe earned 34% more than non-CFEs. ❙❙ Of the respondents that indicated they are in an executive-level position in their organizations, nearly 78% are CFEs. ❙❙ The majority of respondents had more than five years or more of fraud-related experience. Nearly 20% of the responding CFEs had more than 20 years of fraud-related experience. Highlighted Trends The ACFE’s 2013/2014 Compensation Guide for Anti-Fraud Professionals reveals that: CFEs earn 25% more than their non-certified counterparts.
  • 6. 6 Compensation Guide for Anti-Fraud Professionals Executive Summary Respondent Personal and Professional Profile Age Range of Participants The largest group of survey participants range between 35 and 50 years old, accounting for about 44% of both CFEs and non-CFEs. There is a greater percentage of non-CFE participants (34.4%) between the ages of 18 and 35 than CFE partic- ipants (26.9%) in the same age range; conversely, there is a greater percentage of CFE participants (30.1%) over the age of 50 than non-CFE participants (21.2%) in the same age range. Age Range of Participants Gender About two-thirds of the respondents were male, with a median age of 42 and a median of 11 years of fraud- related experience. Female respondents had a median age of 42 and had a median 8 years of fraud-related experience. CFEs by Gender Female Male Median Age 42 42 Median Years of Fraud-Related Experience 8 11 gender 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Over 50 35–50 18–35 Non-CFE CFE 26.9% 43.0% 30.1% 34.4% 44.4% 21.2% Male 65.3% Female 34.7% The largest group of survey partici- pants is between the ages of 35 and 50 accounting for about 44% of both CFEs and non-CFEs.
  • 7. 2013/2014 Global Salary Study 7 CFE vs. Non-CFE Of the 5,486 survey participants, more than two out of three were CFEs. Education Information The majority of participants have at least a four-year college degree (92.6% of CFEs and 84.5% of non-CFEs). About 48% also have a graduate or post-graduate degree (48.3% of CFEs and 45.9% of non-CFEs). The responses indicate that very few anti-fraud professionals enter the field with less than a four-year degree or some form of post high-school, technical or trade school. 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Non-CFECFE Graduate or post- graduate degree Four-year college degree Two-year college degree Post-high school, technical or trade school Some college High school 0.8% 1.4% 3.6% 8.0% 1.0% 2.0% 44.3% 48.3% 2.1% 4.0% 38.6% 45.9% PERCENT OF RESPONDENTS EDUCATIONLEVELOFRESPONDENTS education information cfe vs. non-cfe CFE 72.7% Non-CFE 27.3% The majority of participants have at least a four-year college degree.
  • 8. 8 Compensation Guide for Anti-Fraud Professionals Fraud-Related Experience The largest disparity between CFEs and non-CFEs emerges at more than 20 years of experience: 19.1% of participating CFEs have more than 20 years of experience, compared to only 11.0% of non-CFE participants. Level of Professional Responsibility More than 60% of the respondents indicated their level of professional responsibility was “Manager” or above. Of the 6.8% of the respondents who indicated they are at an executive level of responsibility, 77.7% are CFEs. 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% Other Administrative Support Staff / Consultant / Analyst Manager Supervisor / Senior Consultant Director Partner/Principal Vice President Executive (C-Level) 6.8% 3.8% 3.4% 11.3% 15.2% 23.0% 29.3% 0.7% 6.5% PERCENT OF RESPONDENTS PROFESSIONALLEVELOFRESPONSIBILITYOFRESPONDENTS 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% Non-CFECFE Other Staff / Consultant / Analyst Manager Supervisor / Senior Consultant Director Partner/Principal Vice President Executive (C-Level) 77.7% 22.3% 72.2% 27.8% 76.4% 23.6% 79.7% 72.6% 20.3% 27.4% 26.3% 30.4% 32.8% 73.8% 67.2% 69.6% PERCENT OF RESPONDENTS PROFESSIONALLEVELOFRESPONSIBILITYOFCFES 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% Non-CFECFE 20+ years 10–19 years 5–9 years 3–4 years 0–2 years 13.9% 26.1% 11.6% 14.0% 27.7% 27.8% 19.1% 26.6% 22.4% 11.0% PERCENT OF RESPONDENTS FRAUD-RELATEDEXPERIENCEOFRESPONDENTS level of professional responsibility level of professional responsibility of executives fraud-related experience
  • 9. 2013/2014 Global Salary Study 9 CFE vs. Non-CFE Compensation The table below shows compensation ranges at the 25th percentile, median and 75th percentile.1 All Respondents CFE Non-CFE CFE Premium 25th percentile Median 75th percentile 25th percentile Median 75th percentile Based on Median Total Annual Compensation $68,000 $91,000 $125,000 $51,800 $73,000 $105,000 25% Respondent Compensation Profile Median Total Compensation The survey data indicates that there is a significant earning advantage for CFEs over non-CFEs. Based on participant responses, the median total compensation for a CFE is $91,000, compared to $73,000 for a non-CFE. This represents a CFE premium of 25%. 1 See definitions of 25th percentile, median and 75th percentile on page 18. median total compensation $0 $20,000 $40,000 $60,000 $80,000 $100,000 Non-CFE CFE $91,000 $73,000 MEDIAN TOTAL COMPENSATION RESPONDENT Make sure to visit ACFE.com/SalaryCenter to access our salary calculator and other important information about your individual compensation.
  • 10. 10 Compensation Guide for Anti-Fraud Professionals Compensation Ranges by Age and Gender As one might expect, an age range increase corresponds with a compensation range increase, based upon the survey. At the higher end (age over 50), CFEs earn a median total compensation of $105,668, compared to $96,200 for non-CFEs. This represents a CFE premium of almost 10%. The difference in compensation levels based on gender is evident among both CFEs and non-CFEs. Among CFEs, the median for males is more than 16% higher than females. For non-CFEs, the gap is less, as the median total compensa- tion for males is nearly 15% higher than females. The median total compensation for female CFEs was more than 24% higher than their non-CFE counterparts. For male CFEs, the gap is slightly larger, as the median total compensation for male CFEs is 26% higher than their non-CFE counterparts. By Age CFE Non-CFE CFE Premium 25th percentile Median 75th percentile 25th percentile Median 75th percentile Based on Median 18–35 $59,500 $75,000 $92,768 $44,036 $58,000 $75,563 29% 35–50 $69,500 $95,000 $130,000 $55,000 $78,750 $110,000 21% Over 50 $81,850 $105,668 $145,000 $69,247 $96,200 $134,850 10% By Gender Female $65,000 $83,500 $108,000 $51,434 $67,300 $90,750 24% Male $70,000 $97,000 $135,000 $52,900 $77,175 $114,250 26% Compensation Ranges by Education Level As detailed on page 7, most survey respondents have at least a four-year university degree. Among these respondents, CFEs earn an 18% premium over non-CFEs. For those CFEs with graduate degrees, the premium is even higher at 30%. It is interesting to note that while a small group of participants have a two-year college degree, the CFE carries a signifi- cant premium in this category (CFEs earn about 28% more than non-CFEs among these respondents). Highest Level of Education Completed CFE Non-CFE CFE Premium 25th percentile Median 75th percentile 25th percentile Median 75th percentile Based on Median Some college $60,000 $79,750 $100,300 $51,803 $67,000 $91,630 19% Two-year university degree $68,400 $89,445 $112,250 $47,000 $70,000 $88,000 28% Four-year university degree $68,000 $88,887 $120,000 $52,441 $75,250 $106,000 18% Graduate or post-Graduate degree $69,000 $95,000 $133,000 $51,694 $72,970 $107,700 30%
  • 11. 2013/2014 Global Salary Study 11 Fraud Examiner Median Total Compensation CFE Non-CFE Level of responsibility Supervisor / Senior Consultant $85,000 $73,863 Manager $89,000 $72,392 Staff / Consultant / Analyst $70,000 $60,875 Other $68,028 $57,000 Years of experience 1–2 years $67,100 $50,542 3–4 years $67,500 $52,195 5–9 years $77,667 $65,000 10–19 years $78,824 $71,500 20+ years $100,000 $82,000 Industry of primary area of focus or concentration in 2012 Financial Institutions $72,750 $60,000 Government $82,999 $71,750 Health Care $78,000 $62,100 Insurance $80,650 $74,000 Law Enforcement $77,000 $61,000 Fraud Examiner and Internal Auditor The two largest groups of survey participants based on primary job function are fraud examiners and internal auditors. The following tables provide more detailed information for each of these groups based upon levels of responsibility, years of experi- ence and primary industry or area of focus. The median total compensation in all categories is greater for CFEs than non-CFEs. Internal Auditor Median Total Compensation CFE Non-CFE Level of responsibility Director $128,000 $120,000 Supervisor / Senior Consultant $78,923 $79,800 Manager $100,000 $87,000 Staff / Consultant / Analyst $74,000 $64,200 Years of experience 1–2 years $75,000 $65,750 3–4 years $74,000 $71,600 5–9 years $87,200 $81,000 10–19 years $102,000 $90,000 20+ years $115,000 $98,874 Industry of primary area of focus or concentration in 2012 Education $90,100 $80,777 Financial Institutions $84,750 $70,500 Government $85,000 $66,822 Health Care $92,000 $84,050 Insurance $84,834 $75,500 Manufacturing $104,250 $83,000 Services $90,713 $77,983 Compensation Ranges by Job Function The following table illustrates the difference in compensation range among the survey participants based on their primary job functions. In all of the job function categories, participants with the CFE earn a premium over their non-CFE counterparts. This premium ranged from 9% (Controller) to 50% (Other Accounting/Finance), based on the median total compensation for each job function. Primary Job Function CFE Non-CFE CFE Premium 25th percentile Median 75th percentile 25th percentile Median 75th percentile Based on Median Fraud Examiner / Investigator $62,500 $81,375 $112,500 $50,000 $66,000 $83,000 23% Internal Auditor $70,000 $90,200 $120,787 $57,000 $78,000 $108,000 16% External Auditor $58,697 $76,378 $98,435 $49,375 $62,000 $78,955 23% Forensic Accountant $83,750 $104,000 $150,000 $60,400 $85,000 $127,550 22% CPA, CA or Equivalent $70,000 $95,000 $128,872 $57,875 $85,450 $128,521 11% Controller $74,125 $97,500 $128,000 $57,862 $89,250 $120,000 9% Other Accounting / Finance $60,000 $78,510 $98,671 $40,000 $52,500 $76,075 50% Governance, Risk And Compliance $73,000 $99,400 $137,975 $51,140 $76,300 $108,000 30% Corporate Management $102,250 $135,000 $184,875 $72,250 $110,000 $182,500 23% Loss Prevention $75,375 $92,500 $120,250 $44,250 $61,519 $88,360 50% Security Professional $82,000 $116,000 $150,000 $67,250 $102,000 $140,075 14% Law Enforcement Officer $69,625 $99,000 $117,300 $54,000 $73,000 $89,113 36%
  • 12. 12 Compensation Guide for Anti-Fraud Professionals Compensation Ranges by Primary Industry of Focus Survey participants are segmented among 13 various industries (as well as an “other” category for industries not repre- sented). Based on the median total income levels, CFEs in Manufacturing earn the most ($113,000), followed closely by Law / Legal services ($111,250) and Management Consultants ($99,500). CFEs in Manufacturing also earned the highest premium versus their non-CFE counterparts. Primary Industry of Focus CFE Non-CFE CFE Premium 25th percentile Median 75th percentile 25th percentile Median 75th percentile Based on Median Education $67,800 $88,373 $110,328 $59,000 $85,000 $102,000 4% Financial Institutions $63,000 $85,800 $127,954 $46,750 $65,995 $99,250 30% Government $65,000 $83,935 $106,188 $54,508 $72,000 $96,100 17% Health Care $68,000 $90,000 $123,250 $52,594 $68,493 $106,500 31% Insurance $66,081 $85,000 $113,525 $56,000 $75,000 $100,000 13% Law Enforcement $70,000 $96,000 $117,000 $54,000 $80,000 $105,000 20% Law / Legal Services $83,037 $111,250 $158,750 $69,264 $93,000 $154,000 20% Management Consultants $73,900 $99,500 $170,000 $60,000 $88,000 $150,000 13% Manufacturing $83,006 $113,000 $152,712 $50,600 $71,600 $102,175 58% Public / Chartered Accounting $62,375 $88,250 $129,750 $50,000 $63,700 $84,400 39% Real Estate $59,750 $85,000 $116,375 $51,000 $72,000 $120,000 18% Services $68,750 $92,000 $126,000 $56,375 $75,733 $100,250 21% Non-Profit $63,435 $86,000 $124,500 $51,448 $70,000 $105,000 23% Other $74,500 $98,000 $140,000 $52,825 $80,000 $120,000 23% Make sure to visit ACFE.com/SalaryCenter to access our salary calculator and other important information about your individual compensation.
  • 13. 2013/2014 Global Salary Study 13 Compensation Ranges by Level of Responsibility Among the two largest groups of participants according to level of responsibility — manager and staff/consultant/analyst — the former earned a median salary of $95,650 for CFEs compared to $79,000 for non-CFEs, while the latter earned a median salary of $71,900 for CFEs compared to $60,000 for non-CFEs. Level of Responsibility CFE Non-CFE CFE Premium 25th percentile Median 75th percentile 25th percentile Median 75th percentile Based on Median Executive (C-Level) $100,000 $139,200 $200,000 $71,250 $124,000 $200,000 12% Vice President $90,000 $133,000 $182,000 $77,000 $110,036 $180,000 21% Partner / Principal $110,000 $155,500 $242,500 $88,000 $134,000 $225,000 16% Director $95,000 $129,800 $168,500 $98,980 $120,000 $156,000 8% Supervisor / Senior Consultant $66,000 $82,000 $105,619 $55,550 $76,983 $101,000 7% Manager $74,000 $95,650 $120,000 $54,000 $79,000 $105,000 21% Staff / Consultant / Analyst $58,000 $71,900 $90,000 $45,285 $60,000 $74,786 20% Compensation Ranges by Fraud-Related Experience Anti-fraud professionals with 10-19 years of fraud-related experience accounted for nearly 28% of all respondents, making this the largest group based on experience level. For this category, the median total compensation for CFEs is $100,000, compared with $80,000 for non-CFEs, representing a CFE pay premium of 25%. Years of Fraud-Related Experience CFE Non-CFE CFE Premium 25th percentile Median 75th percentile 25th percentile Median 75th percentile Based on Median 1–2 years $60,000 $73,000 $90,200 $48,500 $60,750 $88,250 20% 3–4 years $59,000 $74,250 $95,018 $44,068 $60,240 $84,500 23% 5–9 years $66,000 $88,638 $115,000 $51,335 $77,750 $107,719 14% 10–19 years $74,872 $100,000 $135,000 $60,000 $80,000 $120,000 25% 20+ years $89,373 $117,000 $155,000 $72,500 $104,000 $155,000 13% CFEs with 10-19 years of fraud-related experience have a 25% premium over non-CFEs with the same amount of experience.
  • 14. 14 Compensation Guide for Anti-Fraud Professionals By Geographic Region CFE Non-CFE CFE Premium 25th percentile Median 75th percentile 25th percentile Median 75th percentile Based on Median U.S. $69,000 $90,000 $121,000 $55,000 $74,000 $105,000 22% Canada $88,000 $102,000 $132,000 $69,650 $83,550 $112,650 22% Europe $75,698 $115,500 $168,500 $60,000 $90,000 $122,000 28% Other International $47,775 $81,750 $134,000 $35,294 $60,944 $93,500 34% Respondent Geographic Profile Geographic Representation About 74% of the respondents indicated their primary office is located in the U.S. and the remaining 26% of respondents are located outside the U.S. U.S. 73.4% Other International 58.9% Europe 15.3% International 26.6% Canada 25.8% overall geographic representation by geographic region U.S. 22.0% Canada 22.0% Europe 28.0% Other International 34.0%
  • 15. 2013/2014 Global Salary Study 15 Regional Compensation Comparison The table below shows the total cash compensation by U.S. regions for all respondents, broken down between CFEs and non-CFEs. The largest concentration of study participants (both CFEs and non-CFEs) is in the South Atlantic, and the lowest is in the New England area. Every region reported a CFE compensation premium. The regions showing the highest premiums are the East North Central Region at 35% followed by the South Atlantic and Mid-Atlantic at 28% and 25% respectively. Outside the U.S. the compensation premium for CFEs is more than 33%. Region CFE Non-CFE New England (ME, NH, VT, MA, RI, CT) Total Median Compensation $87,000 $82,200 % of total CFE and Non-CFE Participants (All Regions) 4% 6% % Breakdown of CFE vs. Non-CFE within the Region 72% 28% Middle-Atlantic (NY, NJ, PA) Total Median Compensation $100,000 $80,000 % of total CFE and Non-CFE Participants (All Regions) 13% 16% % Breakdown of CFE vs. Non-CFE within the Region 75% 25% South Atlantic (MD, WV, VA, DC, DE, NC, SC, GA, FL) Total Median Compensation $90,160 $70,500 % of total CFE and Non-CFE Participants (All Regions) 24% 23% % Breakdown of CFE vs. Non-CFE within the Region 79% 21% East North Central (WI, MI, IL, IN, OH) Total Median Compensation $89,500 $66,144 % of total CFE and Non-CFE Participants (All Regions) 13% 11% % Breakdown of CFE vs. Non-CFE within the Region 81% 19% East South Central (KY, TN, MS, AL) Total Median Compensation $82,400 $66,000 % of total CFE and Non-CFE Participants (All Regions) 5% 4% % Breakdown of CFE vs. Non-CFE within the Region 81% 19% West North Central (MN, ND, SD, NE, IA, MO, KS) Total Median Compensation $80,775 $75,582 % of total CFE and Non-CFE Participants (All Regions) 6% 6% % Breakdown of CFE vs. Non-CFE within the Region 77% 23% West South Central (AR, LA, OK, TX) Total Median Compensation $89,000 $71,250 % of total CFE and Non-CFE Participants (All Regions) 13% 12% % Breakdown of CFE vs. Non-CFE within the Region 80% 20% Mountain (ID, MT, WY, CO, NV, UT, NM, AZ) Total Median Compensation $80,000 $67,500 % of total CFE and Non-CFE Participants (All Regions) 8% 9% % Breakdown of CFE vs. Non-CFE within the Region 78% 22% Pacific (WA, OR, CA, AK, HI) Total Median Compensation $98,245 $80,750 % of total CFE and Non-CFE Participants (All Regions) 13% 12% % Breakdown of CFE vs. Non-CFE within the Region 80% 20% Outside the U.S. Total Median Compensation $100,000 $75,000 % of total CFE and Non-CFE Participants (All Non-U.S.) 59% 41%
  • 16. 16 Compensation Guide for Anti-Fraud Professionals Respondent Benefits Profile Benefits Information The following table shows the benefits offered to participants in their current employment and how benefits are funded: by the employee, employer or both. For major benefits, such as health insurance and dental insurance, the majority of participants (both CFEs and non-CFEs) are enrolled in a joint contribution plan. For most benefits, there were only slight differences between CFEs and non-CFEs in terms of funding. Statistically speaking, the largest differences were in edu- cation funding and/or professional education (for CFEs, 39.5% fully paid by employer, compared to 34.1% for non-CFEs) and professional society dues (for CFEs, 57.5% fully paid by employer, compared to 47% for non-CFEs). Benefits Received (in current employment) Paid Fully by Employer Paid Fully by Employee Joint Contribution Benefit Not Provided Health insurance (HMO, PPO, HSA) CFE 20.1% 4.4% 67.8% 7.7% Non-CFE 21.5% 5.4% 64.2% 9.0% Dental insurance CFE 15.1% 12.9% 56.9% 15.1% Non-CFE 13.5% 12.0% 56.3% 18.1% Disability insurance CFE 31.9% 14.5% 36.5% 17.2% Non-CFE 30.6% 13.5% 35.7% 20.2% Professional liability insurance CFE 32.4% 5.3% 7.6% 54.7% Non-CFE 31.2% 7.1% 10.3% 51.4% Education funding and/or professional education CFE 42.9% 6.2% 31.8% 19.1% Non-CFE 34.0% 7.9% 35.2% 22.9% Professional society dues CFE 60.3% 14.9% 8.1% 16.7% Non-CFE 57.5% 14.2% 8.7% 19.6% Child or elder care CFE 2.7% 14.5% 9.6% 73.3% Non-CFE 2.0% 15.7% 11.2% 71.2% Employee assistance or wellness program CFE 40.6% 5.6% 18.1% 35.7% Non-CFE 39.5% 6.1% 18.8% 35.6% Vehicle provided by employer CFE 11.2% 4.8% 2.8% 81.2% Non-CFE 10.1% 6.1% 3.4% 80.4% Monthly auto allowance CFE 8.2% 3.4% 2.0% 86.4% Non-CFE 10.1% 5.3% 2.1% 82.6% Mileage reimbursement CFE 60.2% 4.6% 4.5% 30.8% Non-CFE 58.8% 4.6% 4.3% 32.3% Parking CFE 43.5% 9.6% 5.0% 42.0% Non-CFE 41.7% 10.6% 5.2% 42.5% Cell phone CFE 44.5% 7.1% 9.2% 39.3% Non-CFE 40.9% 8.8% 9.6% 40.8%
  • 17. 2013/2014 Global Salary Study 17 Retirement Plans As is the case with benefits, the survey results show that retirement plans are similar across the board between CFEs and non-CFEs. The graph shows that defined contribution plans (i.e. 401(k), 403(b), Thrift Savings plans, etc.) are offered to most participants (62.6% for CFEs and 47.9% for non-CFEs). Defined benefit (pension) plans are the next most com- mon offering, as 40% of CFEs and 42.3% of non-CFEs receive pension plans. 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% Non-CFECFE Other retirement plans Profit sharingDefined contribution plan Defined benefit (pension) retirement plan No retirement plan offered 10.2% 40.0% 62.6% 8.2% 8.3% 17.3% 42.3% 47.9% 8.4% 7.9% RETIREMENT PLANS OF RESPONDENTS PERCENTOFRESPONDENTS retirement plans
  • 18. 18 Compensation Guide for Anti-Fraud Professionals Appendix Survey Methodology An email with a link to an online questionnaire was sent to approximately 60,000 ACFE members in late January 2013. A total of 5,486 responses were received by the February deadline, representing a 9.1% response rate. Responses received after the deadline and questionnaires with incomplete information were not included. Based on 5,486 presum- ably random responses and 60,000 for the total population, this study has a +/- 1.3% margin of error (MOE) at a 95% level of confidence. In other words, we can be 95% certain that for a question with 5,486 responses, the survey’s figure would be within +/- 1.3% percentage points of the actual universe’s response. A margin of error of +/- 5% is typically accepted as the “standard” in association research, so this study’s +/- 1.3% figure indicates a stronger than typical level of statistical integrity. Upon receipt, all questionnaires were assigned a confidential identification number, and any remaining identification was removed from the survey form. All data were checked both manually and by a specially designed computer editing procedure. Strict confidence of survey responses was maintained throughout the course of the project. Definitions Total annual compensation The total annual compensation is comprised of such items as annual base pay (salary), commissions, bonuses, profit sharing, etc. Number of responses The number of responses in a particular grouping. Average The simple average of all responses for a particular item (e.g., it is the result of summing the values and dividing by the total number of responses). Median (or 50th percentile) The center value of the total distribution of the data that was reported (e.g., it is the value at which 50% of the responses are above and 50% are below). This measure is less likely than an average to be distorted by a few outlying responses. 25th percentile The observation point below which 25% of the responses lie (e.g., 25% of the respondents earn less than this amount and 75% earn more). 75th percentile The observation point below which 75% of the responses lie (e.g., 75% of the respondents earn less than this amount and 25% earn more). Disclaimer The statistical information contained in this report is believed to be representative of the individuals responding to the survey. All reasonable efforts were taken by Industry Insights, Inc. to assure data comparability within the limitations of reporting procedures. However, the data used in this report are not necessarily based on audited data, and the statistical validity of any given number varies depending upon sample sizes and the amount of consistency among responses for that particular figure. Industry Insights and ACFE, therefore, make no representations or warranties with respect to the results of this study and shall not be liable to clients or anyone else for any information inaccuracies, or errors or omis- sions in contents, regardless of the cause of such inaccuracy, error or omission. In no event shall Industry Insights and/or ACFE be liable for any consequential damages.
  • 19. 2013/2014 Global Salary Study 19 About the ACFE The ACFE is the world’s largest anti-fraud organization and the premier provider of anti-fraud training and education. Together with more than 65,000 members, the ACFE is reducing the incidence of fraud and white-collar crime worldwide and inspiring public confidence in the integrity and objectivity within the profession. Based in Austin, Texas, the ACFE was founded in 1988 by preeminent fraud expert and author, Dr. Joseph T. Wells, CFE, CPA. Dr. Wells’ insight as an accountant-turned-FBI agent led to the formation of a common body of knowledge known today as fraud examination. Members of the ACFE include CPAs, auditors, lawyers, investigators, law enforcement officers, security professionals, executives, managers and anyone whose job involves preventing, detecting or deterring fraud. The ACFE supports mem- bers and the anti-fraud profession by providing conferences, seminars and other training events year-round, while also offering self-study and online learning opportunities, manuals, software and other resources for fighting fraud. Certified Fraud Examiners (CFEs) The ACFE established and administers the Certified Fraud Examiner (CFE) credential. Globally preferred by employers, the CFE credential denotes proven expertise in fraud prevention, detection, deterrence and investigation. Members with the CFE credential gain a professional advantage and quickly position themselves as leaders in the global anti-fraud community. For more information about the ACFE and Certified Fraud Examiners, visit ACFE.com. CERTIFIED FRAUD EXAMINER The ACFE is the world’s largest anti-fraud organization and the premier provider of anti-fraud training and education.
  • 20. ©2013 Association of Certified Fraud Examiners. Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, ACFE, the ACFE logo, the ACFE Seal, Certified Fraud Examiner and CFE are trademarks owned by the Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc. GLOBAL Headquarters • the gregor building 716 West Avenue • Austin, TX 78701-2727 • USA Phone: (800) 245-3321 / +1 (512) 478-9000 info@ACFE.com • ACFE.com Share this guide: