OCWC Global Conference 2013: Our Experience for operating regional consortium in Japan
•
0 j'aime•492 vues
This document summarizes the history and current state of the Japan Open Courseware Consortium (JOCW). It describes how JOCW was established in 2004 with top Japanese universities as founding members. JOCW started without external funding, relying on internal budgets. It has since expanded to include over 40 member institutions and provides over 2500 courses openly online in Japanese and English. Surveys show high public interest in accessing university lectures online. However, JOCW still faces challenges of low faculty engagement, traditional teaching styles, and intellectual property restrictions limiting further open content growth.
Recommandé
Recommandé
Contenu connexe
Similaire à OCWC Global Conference 2013: Our Experience for operating regional consortium in Japan
Similaire à OCWC Global Conference 2013: Our Experience for operating regional consortium in Japan (20)
Plus de The Open Education Consortium
Plus de The Open Education Consortium (20)
Dernier
Dernier (20)
OCWC Global Conference 2013: Our Experience for operating regional consortium in Japan
- 1. Yoshimi Fukuhara yoshimi@jocw.jp Secretary General, Japan OCW Consortium previous Board member, OpenCourseWare Consortium Professor, Meiji University 2013/05/09!OCWC Global 2013!
- 2. History of JOCW 2004! 2005! 2006! 2003.9 MIT OCW JOCW 9 OCW Consortium! established! JOCW officially 2002.9! MIT OCW! JOCW 2013/05/09!OCWC Global 2013!
- 3. Unique Characteristics at the beginning • Most of top ranked national universities and top two private universities were members • All of member universities were joined as whole university level under the organizational approval • JOCW started with no external grant, but internal budget from each member universities. 2013/05/09!OCWC Global 2013!
- 4. Members in JOCW 2013/05/09!OCWC Global 2013! 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 Affiliate members Associate members Institutional members
- 5. Courses from JOCW 2013/05/09!OCWC Global 2013! 96 257 563 806 1285 1523 1817 2572 57 95 151 172 215 275 394 489 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 English Japanese
- 6. Every University join as a whole university level participation Bold: Board members Members（by joinning year） year Organizations（Institution、Non-profit、Company） 2005 Osaka Univ., Kyoto Univ., Keio Univ., Tokyo Tech., Univ. of Tokyo, Waseda Univ., Kyushu Univ.,Nagoya Univ., Hokkaido Univ.,NIME 2006 Kansai Univ., Univ. of Tsukuba, Doshisya Univ., Kyoto-Seika Univ., Ritsumeikan Univ., APRU、AVCC、CCC-TIES、eLC 2007 Kagawa Nutrition Univ., Meiji Univ., United Nations Univ., Creative Commons Japan, Asahi Shinbun, NTT Resonant, TDU Press, Mediasite, MediaLink, Digital Knowledge 2008 ICU, Uchida Yoko, Castalia, Global Commons, NTT DoCoMo 2009 Open Univ. of Japan, Hosei Univ., Kwansei Univ., SoftBank BB, Celego Japan 2010 Sofia Univ., CMS Communications 2011 Uchida Spectrum, Kumamoto Univ. 2012 Bunka Gakuen, Net-Learning, Pro-seeds 2013/05/09!OCWC Global 2013!
- 7. Web site of JOCW 2013/05/09!OCWC Global 2013!
- 8. Transition of OER 2013/05/09!OCWC Global 2013! Stage1 Opening up of Course Contents Paradigm shift: Close to Open Many preliminary OCW Text based content Stage2 More Rich Media publishing Lecture Video iTunesU Stage3 Creating Learners Community Open Study Stage4 Giving Certificate(e.g. informal badge) Path to the Official Credit OER University P2P University Stage5 Open Online Courses: MOOCs coursera Udasity edX
- 9. Survey period：i. Jan. 22 - Jan.28, 2010 ii. Jan. 28 – Jan.30, 2009 Method： Internet research number of respondents：1200 detail：Teens: 200, Twenties:200 Thirties: 200, Forties: 200 Fifties: 200, Sixties: 200 Number of Questions：37 Opinion poll on opening up of University 2013/05/09!OCWC Global 2013!
- 10. Q: How do you think about this project? From inside 2006, 2007,2008 2009, 2010 35.9 57.8 5.1 1.3 29.2 63.9 6 1 Very good Good Not so good Not good 2013/05/09!OCWC Global 2013!
- 11. Q: Do you want to use if you can see lecture from various universities on the internet? 27.8 52.3 17.4 1.31 29.2 50.1 17.3 2.6 0.8 見たい どちらかといえば見た い どちらでもない どちらかといえば見た くない 見たくない From inside 2006, 2007,2008 2009, 2010 2013/05/09!OCWC Global 2013!
- 12. Q: What kind of information do you want for university lecture contents? 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 Syllabi Lecture notes Lecture video Others 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013/05/09!OCWC Global 2013!
- 13. Q: What’s purpose do you want to use? 0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0 70.0 80.0 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013/05/09!OCWC Global 2013!
- 14. Q: Do you know those universities have published their lecture contents? 0.4 25.1 74.5 0.6 21 78.5 I know all of them Part of them Nothing From inside 2006, 2007,2008 2009, 2010 2013/05/09!OCWC Global 2013!
- 15. Asian Collaboration on OCW • Asia Regional OpenCourseware and Open Education Conference • To share experiences and know-how • To exchange opinions on technological and social challenges • AROOC 2009 • Korea University, Seoul, South Korea • AROOC2010 • National Chao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan • AROOC2011 • Meiji University, Tokyo, Japan • AROOC2012 • Thai Cyber University, Bangkok, Thailand • AROOC2013( on coming October 28-29) • University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia 2013/05/09!OCWC Global 2013!
- 16. Current Issues • Financial weakness; no big grant comes from government or foundation • Low consciousness of faculty members; very few positive faculty members • Traditional teaching style • Very tight IPR low; big obstacle to increase courses, no fair use consensus 2013/05/09!OCWC Global 2013!
- 17. Conclusion and Challenges • Potential is huge • Big expectation for life-long learning society • More willingness for self-learning • Learning Environment have been well-improved • Accumulation of learning contents • Commoditization of learning devices/terminals • Learning community using social media • Current tendency of certification/credit 2013/05/09!OCWC Global 2013!